Upload
hoangdiep
View
232
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
OVERVIEW
What software architecture is and why it is interesting
Who are the stakeholders
What software qualities does software architecture concern
UML diagrams expressing aspects of software architecture
Architectural styles or software architectural design patterns
SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE
A Software Architecture defines:
• the components of the software system
• how the components use each other’s functionality and data
• how control is managed between the components
The highest level of design – large-scale structure of solution
SOFTWARE QUALITIES
What are the various software qualities (= non-functional requirements) that software architecture is concerned with?
Which software qualities are of interest to which stakeholders?
Which software qualities are conflicting?
COMPONENT DIAGRAMS
Component – a set of related operations that share a common purpose
Interface – the set of operations available to other sub-systems
Required interface
Provided interface
Plugging
PACKAGE DIAGRAMS
Useful for expressing the dependencies between major elements of a system.
PackagesHierarchy
Dependency
DEPLOYMENT DIAGRAMS
Express the physical deployment of software artefacts to hardware nodes – static view of run-time configuration
Use when application spans several machines.
Nodes correspond to
• devices (e.g., servers, mobile devices)
• specific execution environments (application servers, rule engines, operating system, virtual machines, database engines, web browser).
Nodes connected by communication paths (middleware, protocol)
GUIDELINES
1. Identify the scope of the model – single application, group of applications?
2. Consider fundamental technical constraints – existing systems, robustness, who/how users connect, middleware, hardware, software, ...
3. Identify distribution architecture – Fat client, thin client, 3-tier?
4. Identify nodes and their connections – What kinds of nodes do you have? How connected?
5. Distribute software to nodes – indicate also critical information for whoever implements or deploys system
CONFLICTING QUALITIES
Which software qualities are conflicting?
Why?
How can these conflicts be resolved?
ARCHITECTURAL STYLES
Object-oriented
Client server ; object broker; peer to peer
Pipe and filter
Event based – publish/subscriber
Layered – Three-tier, Four-tier
Repositories: blackboard, Model/View/Controller (MVC)
Process control
The diagrams that follow capture only high level of abstraction — still need to place components.
MODEL-VIEW-CONTROLLER
Properties
• One central model, many views (viewers)
• Each view has an associated controller
• The controller handles updates from the user of the view
• Changes to the model are propagated to all the views
University of Toronto Department of Computer Science
© 2004-5 Steve Easterbrook. This presentation is available free for non-commercial use with attribution under a creative commons license. 16
Variant: Model-View-Controller
controller
controller
view
mod
el
view propagate propagate
update update
accessaccess
Properties One central model, many views (viewers)
Each view has an associated controller
The controller handles updates from the user of the view
Changes to the model are propagated to all the views
MODEL-VIEW-CONTROLLER (MVC)
• Model contains domain knowledge
• Views only display data
• Controllers only manage interaction sequences
Model does not depend on views or controllers
Subscribe/notify mechanism
EXAMPLE MODEL-VIEW-CONTROLLERUniversity of Toronto Department of Computer Science
© 2004-5 Steve Easterbrook. This presentation is available free for non-commercial use with attribution under a creative commons license. 17
Model View Controller Example
MVC INTERACTIONUniversity of Toronto Department of Computer Science
© 2004-5 Steve Easterbrook. This presentation is available free for non-commercial use with attribution under a creative commons license. 18
MVC Component Interaction
OBJECT-ORIENTED ARCHITECTURES
• Example
• Abstract data types (modules)
• Interesting properties
• data hiding (internal data representations are not visible to clients)
• can decompose problems into sets of interacting agents
• can be multi-threaded or single thread
• Disadvantages
• objects must know the identity of objects they wish to interact with
University of Toronto Department of Computer Science
© 2004-5 Steve Easterbrook. This presentation is available free for non-commercial use with attribution under a creative commons license. 6
Object Oriented Architectures
Examples: abstract data types
Interesting properties data hiding (internal data representations are not visible to clients)
can decompose problems into sets of interacting agents
can be multi-threaded or single thread
Disadvantages objects must know the identity of objects they wish to interact with
obje
ct
obje
ct
obje
ct
obje
ct
obje
ct
methodinvocation
methodinvocation
methodinvocation method
invocation
Source: Adapted from Shaw & Garlan 1996, p22-3.
VARIANT: CLIENT-SERVERUniversity of Toronto Department of Computer Science
© 2004-5 Steve Easterbrook. This presentation is available free for non-commercial use with attribution under a creative commons license. 7
Variant 1: Client Server
Interesting properties Is a special case of the previous pattern object oriented architecture
Clients do not need to know about one another
Disadvantages Client objects must know the identity of the server
client
client
client
methodinvocation
methodinvocation
methodinvocation
Serve
r
• Interesting properties
• Clients do not need to know about one another
• Breaks the system into manageable components
• Independent flow of control
• Server generally responsible for persistence and consistency of data
• Disadvantages
• Client objects must know the identity of the server
CLIENT-SERVER
Client/Server communication via remote procedure call or common object broker (e.g. CORBA, Java RMI, or HTTP)
Distributed systems. e.g,. web services, system with central DBMS
Variants
– thick clients have their own services
– thin ones get everything from servers
VARIANT: OBJECT BROKER
• Interesting Properties
• Adds a broker between the clients and servers
• Clients no longer need to know which server they are using
• Can have many brokers, many servers.
• Disadvantages
• Broker can become a bottleneck
• Degraded performance
University of Toronto Department of Computer Science
© 2004-5 Steve Easterbrook. This presentation is available free for non-commercial use with attribution under a creative commons license. 8
Variant 2: Object Brokers
serve
r
serve
r
broke
r
clientclie
nt
client
Interesting properties Adds a broker between the clients and servers
Clients no longer need to know which server they are using
Can have many brokers, many servers.
Disadvantages Broker can become a bottleneck
Degraded performance
BROKER ARCHITECTURE EXAMPLEUniversity of Toronto Department of Computer Science
© 2004-5 Steve Easterbrook. This presentation is available free for non-commercial use with attribution under a creative commons license. 9
Broker Architecture Example
VARIANT: PEER-TO-PEER
Server/Tracker/Directory
Peer
Peer
Peer
PeerPeer
• Interesting Properties
• Find peers via server or broadcast.
• Interact subsequently with peers.
• Reduces bottleneck. Robust to peer failure.
• Disadvantages
• Server can become a bottleneck
• Peers have only incomplete picture – synchronisation is (virtually) impossible
PIPE AND FILTER
• Examples
• Unix command shell
• compiler chain: lexical analysis → parsing → semantic analysis → code generation
• signal processing
• Interesting properties:
• filters don't need to know anything about what they are connected to
• filters can be implemented in parallel
• behaviour of the system is the composition of behaviour of the filters
• specialised analysis such as throughput and deadlock analysis is possible
University of Toronto Department of Computer Science
© 2004-5 Steve Easterbrook. This presentation is available free for non-commercial use with attribution under a creative commons license. 5
Pipe-and-filter
Examples: UNIX shell commands
Compilers: Lexical Analysis -> parsing -> semantic analysis -> code generation
Signal Processing
Interesting properties: filters don’t need to know anything about what they are connected to
filters can be implemented in parallel
behaviour of the system is the composition of behaviour of the filters specialized analysis such as throughput and deadlock analysis is possible
filter
filterfilter
filter
filter
filter
pipe
pipe
pipe
pipe
pipe
pipe
pipe pipe
pipe
Source: Adapted from Shaw & Garlan 1996, p21-2. See also van Vliet, 1999 Pp266-7 and p279
grep gustav < foo.txt | sort | cut –f2-3
EVENT-BASED (IMPLICIT INVOCATION)
• Examples
• debugging systems (listen for particular breakpoints)
• database management systems (for data integrity checking)
• graphical user interfaces
• Interesting properties
• announcers of events don’t need to know who will handle the event
• supports re-use, and evolution of systems (add new agents easily)
• Disadvantages
• Components have no control over ordering of computations
University of Toronto Department of Computer Science
© 2004-5 Steve Easterbrook. This presentation is available free for non-commercial use with attribution under a creative commons license. 10
Event based (implicit invocation)
Examples debugging systems (listen for particular breakpoints)
database management systems (for data integrity checking)
graphical user interfaces
Interesting properties announcers of events don’t need to know who will handle the event
Supports re-use, and evolution of systems (add new agents easily)
Disadvantages Components have no control over ordering of computations
broadcastmedium
agent
agent
agent
agent
announceevent
announceevent
listen forevent
listen foreventbroadcast
medium
Source: Adapted from Shaw & Garlan 1996, p23-4. See also van Vliet, 1999 Pp264-5 and p278
LAYERED SYSTEMS
• Examples
• Operating Systems
• communication protocols
• Interesting properties
• Support increasing levels of abstraction during design
• Support enhancement (add functionality) and re-use
• can define standard layer interfaces
• Disadvantages
• May not be able to identify (clean) layers
University of Toronto Department of Computer Science
© 2004-5 Steve Easterbrook. This presentation is available free for non-commercial use with attribution under a creative commons license. 11
kernal
Layered Systems
Examples Operating Systems
communication protocols
Interesting properties Support increasing levels of abstraction during design
Support enhancement (add functionality) and re-use
can define standard layer interfaces
Disadvantages May not be able to identify (clean) layers
kernal
utilities
application layer
users
Source: Adapted from Shaw & Garlan 1996, p25. See also van Vliet, 1999, p281.
LAYERS AND PARTITIONS
• Layering
• Hierarchical decomposition → tree of sub-systems
• “Horizontal division”
• Open vs closed layers
• Partitioning
• “Vertical division”: Each set handles a function
• Extreme form of decoupling: Semi-independent
EXAMPLE: 3-LAYER DATA ACCESSUniversity of Toronto Department of Computer Science
© 2004-5 Steve Easterbrook. This presentation is available free for non-commercial use with attribution under a creative commons license. 12
Variant: 3-layer data accessPresentation layer
Application Logic layer
Storage layerJava
AW
T
Appl’n
Views
Contol
obje
cts
Busine
sslogic
Que
ryEngine
File
Mgm
nt
DBM
S
OPEN VS CLOSED ARCHITECTURE
closed architecture• each layer only uses services of the layer
immediately below;• minimises dependencies between layers and
reduces the impact of a change.open architecture• a layer can use services from any lower layer.• More compact code, as the services of lower
layers can be accessed directly• Breaks the encapsulation of layers, so
increase dependencies between layers
University of Toronto Department of Computer Science
© 2004-5 Steve Easterbrook. This presentation is available free for non-commercial use with attribution under a creative commons license. 13
Open vs. Closed Layered Architecture
closed architecture each layer only uses services of the layer
immediately below;
Minimizes dependencies between layers andreduces the impact of a change.
open architecture a layer can use services from any lower
layer.
More compact code, as the services of lowerlayers can be accessed directly
Breaks the encapsulation of layers, soincrease dependencies between layers
Layer N
Layer N-1
Layer 2
Layer 1
Layer N
Layer N-1
Layer 2
Layer 1
HOW MANY LAYERS?2 layers:
application layerdatabase layere.g., simple client-server model
3 layers (three tier):separate out the business logic
helps make both user interface and database layers modifiable
4 layers (four tier):separate applications from the domain entities that they use
boundary classes in presentation layercontrol classes in application layerentity classes in domain layer
partitioned 4 layers:identify separated applications
University of Toronto Department of Computer Science
© 2004-5 Steve Easterbrook. This presentation is available free for non-commercial use with attribution under a creative commons license. 14
How many layers?
2-layers: application layer
database layer
e.g. simple client-server model
3-layers: separate out the business logic
helps to make both user interface anddatabase layers modifiable
4-layers: Separates applications from the
domain entities that they use:boundary classes in presentation layer
control classes in application layerentity classes in domain layer
Partitioned 4-layers identify separate applications
Application (client)
Database (server)
Presentation layer (user interface)
Business Logic
Database
Presentation layer (user interface)
Applications
Domain Entities
Database
UI1 UI2 UI3 UI4
App1 App2 App3 App4
Domain Entities
Database
REPOSITORIES• Examples
• databases
• blackboard expert systems
• programming environments
• Interesting properties
• can choose where the locus of control is (agents, blackboard, both)
• reduce the need to duplicate complex data
• Disadvantages
• blackboard becomes a bottleneck
University of Toronto Department of Computer Science
© 2004-5 Steve Easterbrook. This presentation is available free for non-commercial use with attribution under a creative commons license. 15
Repositories
Examples databases
blackboard expert systems
programming environments
Interesting properties can choose where the locus of control is (agents, blackboard, both)
reduce the need to duplicate complex data
Disadvantages blackboard becomes a bottleneck
blackboard(shareddata)
agent
agent
agent
agent
agent
agent
Source: Adapted from Shaw & Garlan 1996, p26-7. See also van Vliet, 1999, p280
REPOSITORY
• Sub-systems access and modify a single data structure
• Complex, changing data
• Concurrency & data consistency
• Control by sub-systems or by repository (blackboard)
• Disadvantage: Possibly performance bottlenecks and reduced modifiability
• E.g. databases, IDE’s, tuple spaces
PROCESS CONTROL
• Examples
• aircraft/spacecraft flight control systems
• controllers for industrial production lines, power stations, etc.
• chemical engineering
• Interesting properties
• separates control policy from the controlled process
• handles real-time, reactive computations
• Disadvantages
• difficult to specify the timing characteristics and response to disturbances
University of Toronto Department of Computer Science
© 2004-5 Steve Easterbrook. This presentation is available free for non-commercial use with attribution under a creative commons license. 19
Process Control
Examples aircraft/spacecraft flight control systems
controllers for industrial production lines, power stations, etc.
chemical engineering
Interesting properties separates control policy from the controlled process
handles real-time, reactive computations
Disadvantages Difficult to specify the timing characteristics and response to disturbances
processcontroller
input variables
controlledvariables
controlparameters
manipulatedvariables
sensors
actuators
Source: Adapted from Shaw & Garlan 1996, p27-31.