Upload
rosaline-yroz
View
48
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Advanced Scaling Techniques for the Modeling of Materials Processing. Patricio F. Mendez Colorado School of Mines. Goals. For people less familiar with scaling will show how scaling is especially helpful for materials processes For people familiar with scaling - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
CWJCR
Advanced Scaling Techniques for the Modeling of Materials Processing
Patricio F. MendezColorado School of Mines
2CWJCR
Goals
• For people less familiar with scaling– will show how scaling is especially helpful for materials
processes
• For people familiar with scaling– will show a new relationship that permits to automate part
of the scaling process
• The reasoning applies to almost all materials processes
• For clarity, I’ll use a particular welding problem as an example, but the approach is valid beyond welding
3CWJCR
Materials Processes are “Multiphysics” and Coupled
• Welding example: free surface depression of weld pool. Can induce defects and lower productivity
4CWJCR
Materials Processes are “Multiphysics” and Coupled
• Multiphysics in the weld pool (12)
weld pool
substrate
solidified metal
arc
electrode
5CWJCR
Materials Processes are “Multiphysics” and Coupled
• Multiphysics in the weld pool– Inertial forces
weld pool
substrate
solidified metal
arc
electrode
6CWJCR
Materials Processes are “Multiphysics” and Coupled
• Multiphysics in the weld pool– Inertial forces– Viscous forces
weld pool
substrate
solidified metal
arc
electrode
7CWJCR
Materials Processes are “Multiphysics” and Coupled
• Multiphysics in the weld pool– Inertial forces– Viscous forces– Hydrostatic
weld pool
substrate
solidified metal
arc
electrode
gh
8CWJCR
Materials Processes are “Multiphysics” and Coupled
• Multiphysics in the weld pool– Inertial forces– Viscous forces– Hydrostatic– Buoyancy
weld pool
substrate
solidified metal
arc
electrode
ghT
9CWJCR
Materials Processes are “Multiphysics” and Coupled
• Multiphysics in the weld pool– Inertial forces– Viscous forces– Hydrostatic– Buoyancy– Conduction
weld pool
substrate
solidified metal
arc
electrode
10CWJCR
Materials Processes are “Multiphysics” and Coupled
• Multiphysics in the weld pool– Inertial forces– Viscous forces– Hydrostatic– Buoyancy– Conduction– Convection
weld pool
substrate
solidified metal
arc
electrode
11CWJCR
Materials Processes are “Multiphysics” and Coupled
• Multiphysics in the weld pool– Inertial forces– Viscous forces– Hydrostatic– Buoyancy– Conduction– Convection– Electromagnetic
weld pool
substrate
solidified metal
arc
electrode
J
BB
J×B
12CWJCR
Materials Processes are “Multiphysics” and Coupled
• Multiphysics in the weld pool– Inertial forces– Viscous forces– Hydrostatic– Buoyancy– Conduction– Convection– Electromagnetic– Free surface
weld pool
substrate
solidified metal
arc
electrode
13CWJCR
Materials Processes are “Multiphysics” and Coupled
• Multiphysics in the weld pool– Inertial forces– Viscous forces– Hydrostatic– Buoyancy– Conduction– Convection– Electromagnetic– Free surface– Gas shear
weld pool
substrate
solidified metal
arc
electrode
14CWJCR
Materials Processes are “Multiphysics” and Coupled
• Multiphysics in the weld pool– Inertial forces– Viscous forces– Hydrostatic– Buoyancy– Conduction– Convection– Electromagnetic– Free surface– Gas shear– Arc pressure
weld pool
substrate
solidified metal
arc
electrode
15CWJCR
Materials Processes are “Multiphysics” and Coupled
• Multiphysics in the weld pool– Inertial forces– Viscous forces– Hydrostatic– Buoyancy– Conduction– Convection– Electromagnetic– Free surface– Gas shear– Arc pressure– Marangoni
weld pool
substrate
solidified metal
arc
electrode
16CWJCR
Materials Processes are “Multiphysics” and Coupled
• Multiphysics in the weld pool (12)– Inertial forces– Viscous forces– Hydrostatic– Buoyancy– Conduction– Convection– Electromagnetic– Free surface– Gas shear– Arc pressure– Marangoni– Capillary weld pool
substrate
solidified metal
arc
electrode
17CWJCR
Materials Processes are “Multiphysics” and Coupled
Hydrostatic
Buoyancy
Electromagnetic
Free surface
Capillary
Gas shear
Arc pressure
Marangoni
Inertial forcesViscous forces
ConductionConvection
18CWJCR
Materials Processes are “Multiphysics” and Coupled
Hydrostatic
Buoyancy
Electromagnetic
Free surface
Capillary
Gas shear
Arc pressure
Marangoni
Inertial forcesViscous forces
ConductionConvection
19CWJCR
Materials Processes are “Multiphysics” and Coupled
Hydrostatic
Buoyancy
Electromagnetic
Free surface
Capillary
Gas shear
Arc pressure
Marangoni
Inertial forcesViscous forces
ConductionConvection
20CWJCR
Materials Processes are “Multiphysics” and Coupled
Hydrostatic
Buoyancy
Electromagnetic
Free surface
Capillary
Gas shear
Arc pressure
Marangoni
Inertial forcesViscous forces
ConductionConvection
21CWJCR
Materials Processes are “Multiphysics” and Coupled
Hydrostatic
Buoyancy
Electromagnetic
Free surface
Capillary
Gas shear
Arc pressure
Marangoni
Inertial forcesViscous forces
ConductionConvection
22CWJCR
Materials Processes are “Multiphysics” and Coupled
Hydrostatic
Buoyancy
Electromagnetic
Free surface
Capillary
Gas shear
Arc pressure
Marangoni
Inertial forcesViscous forces
ConductionConvection
23CWJCR
Materials Processes are “Multiphysics” and Coupled
Hydrostatic
Buoyancy
Electromagnetic
Free surface
Capillary
Gas shear
Arc pressure
Marangoni
Inertial forcesViscous forces
ConductionConvection
24CWJCR
Disagreement about dominant mechanism
• Experiments cannot show under the surface• Numerical simulations have convergence
problems with a very deformed free surface
Proposed explanations for very deformed weld pool• Ishizaki (1980): gas shear, experimental• Oreper (1983): Marangoni, numerical• Lin (1985): vortex, analytical• Choo (1991): Arc pressure, gas shear, numerical• Rokhlin (1993): electromagnetic, hydrodynamic,
experimental• Weiss (1996): arc pressure, numerical
25CWJCR
Scaling of a high current weld pool• Goals:
– Identify dominant phenomena:• gas shear? Marangoni? electromagnetic? arc pressure?
– Relate results to process parameters• materials properties, welding velocity, weld current
– Estimate characteristic values:• velocity, thickness, temperature
thickness
velocity
27CWJCR
Scaling of a high current weld pool• Boundary Conditions:
at free surface at solid-melt interface
far from weld
free surface
solid-melt interfacefar from weld
28CWJCR
Scaling of a high current weld pool• Variables and Parameters
– independent variables (2)
– dependent variables (9)
– parameters (18)
from other models, experiments
with so many parameters Dimensional Analysis is not effective
29CWJCR
Classical Scaling Approach
1. Scale variables and differential expressions
2. Assume a set of dominant driving forces
3. Normalize equations
4. Solve for the unknown terms
5. Verify self-consistency
6. If not self-consistent, return to 3.
Roughly, this is the approach suggested by Dantzig and Tucker, Bejan, Kline, Denn, Deen, Sides, Chen, Astarita, and more
33CWJCR
Classical Scaling Approachgoverning equation
scaled variables
OM(1)normalized equation
output inputinput
36CWJCR
Classical Scaling Approach
output inputinput
two possible balances
B1 B2
balance B1 generates one algebraic equation:
37CWJCR
Classical Scaling Approach
output inputinput
two possible balances
B1 B2
balance B1 generates one algebraic equation:
balance B2 generates a different equation:
38CWJCR
Classical Scaling Approach
output inputinput
two possible balances
B1 B2
balance B1 generates one algebraic equation:
balance B2 generates a different equation:
self-consistency: choose the balance that makes the neglected term less than 1
39CWJCR
Classical Scaling Approachtwo possible balances
balance B1 generates one algebraic equation:
balance B2 generates a different equation:
self-consistency: choose the balance that makes the neglected term less than 1
TWO BIG PROBLEMS FOR MATERIALS PROCESSES!
40CWJCR
Classical Scaling Approachtwo possible balances
balance B1 generates one algebraic equation:
balance B2 generates a different equation:
self-consistency: choose the balance that makes the neglected term less than 1
TWO BIG PROBLEMS FOR MATERIALS PROCESSES!
?
??
?
?
1 equation2 unknowns
1 equation3 unknowns
1. Each balance equation involves more than one unknown
41CWJCR
Classical Scaling Approach
1. Each balance equation involves more than one unknown
2. A system of equations involves many thousands of possible balances
two possible balances
balance B1 generates one algebraic equation:
balance B2 generates a different equation:
self-consistency: choose the balance that makes the neglected term less than 1
TWO BIG PROBLEMS FOR MATERIALS PROCESSES!
42CWJCR
Scaled equations (9)
all coefficients are power lawsall terms in parenthesis expected to be OM(1)
44CWJCR
Iterative process
• Simple scaling approach involves 334098 possible combinations
• There are 116 self-consistent solutions– there is no unicity of solution– we cannot stop at first self-consistent solution– self-consistent solutions are grouped into 55
classes (1- 6 solutions per class)
45CWJCR
Automating iterative process
• Power-law coefficients can be transformed into linear expressions using logarithms
• Several power law equations can then be transformed into a linear system of equations
• Normalizing an equation consists of subtracting rows
47CWJCR
9 equations
6 BCs
one row for each term of the equation
18 parameters 9 unknown charact. values
50CWJCR
Calculation of a Balance1. select 9 equations2. select dom. input3. select dom. output4. build submatrix of
selected normalized outputs
18 parameters 9 unknown charact. values
[No]P’ [No]S 9x9
53CWJCR
Calculation of a Balance
18 parameters 9 unknown charact. values
[No]P’ [No]S 9x9
incompatible
power law estimation
54CWJCR
Calculation of a Balance
incompatible
power law estimation
9 unknowns 18 parametersMatrix [S]
56CWJCR
Self consistency
• can be checked using matrix approach
• checking the 334098 combinations took 72 seconds using Matlab on a Pentium M 1.4 GHz
secondary terms submatrices of normalizedsecondary terms
58CWJCR force dominant
force drivinggroups essdimensionl provide termsSecondary
Scaling results
1.00
0.34
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.03
0.03
0.03
7.E
-05
3.E
-04
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
arc
pres
sure
/ vi
scou
s
elec
trom
agne
tic
/ vis
cous
hydr
osta
tic
/ vis
cous
capi
llar
y / v
isco
us
Mar
ango
ni /
gas
shea
r
buoy
ancy
/ vi
scou
s
gas
shea
r / v
isco
us
conv
ecti
on /
cond
ucti
on
iner
tial
/ vi
scou
s
diff
.=/d
iff.
plasma shear causes crater
59CWJCR
Summary
• Materials processes are “Multiphysics” and “Multicoupled”
• Scaling helps understand the dominant forces in materials processes
• Several thousand iterations are necessary for scaling
• The “Matrix of Coefficients” and associate matrix relationships help automate scaling
61CWJCR
Approaches to the high current weld pool problem
• Experimental
Ishizaki, 1962,1980. Hammer blow, water droplets. Savage 1978, blank shot
Shimada, 1982
Force Balance:
Lin and Eagar, 1985
Savage, 1979
Adonyi, 1992
… and many more
very depressed weld pool become a “film”
62CWJCR
Approaches to the high current weld pool problem
• Numerical
Kumar A, Zhang W, DebRoy T, JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D, 2005
Lee, Welding Journal, 1997
Chen, 1998
Kim, Welding Journal, 1992
Tsai, Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids, 1989Zacharia, Welding Journal, 1988
Most numerical models based on recirculating flows
Wei and Giedt, Welding Journal 1985
63CWJCR
Approaches to the high current weld pool problem
• Scaling: Focused on recirculating flowsOreper & Szekely, J. Fluid Mech.
1984, TWR 1986
DebRoy & David
Rev. Modern Phys
1995
Rivas & Ostrach,
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
1992
Chakraborty & Dutta
STWJ, 1992
No velocity BL
No thermal BL
Velocity BL
No thermal BL
Velocity BL
Thermal BL
T, R, D come from numerical calculations, experiments
T comes from scaling, R, D from numerical calculations, experiments