Advanced ACT Workshop Counselling College 100410

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Autor: Steven Hayes

Citation preview

  • Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Advanced WorkshopJulian McNally

  • Program OutlineReview Of ACT ModelGetting Stuck Into Getting Stuck7 Frequent Problems And How To RespondSweet Spot And Client DescendingMatrix For Case FormulationDeveloping Mastery In ACT

  • HexaflexACT Model of Effective LivingValues, Purpose & MeaningDefusionCommitted ActionsContact with the Present MomentAcceptance & WillingnessTranscendent Sense of Self/ Self As ContextPsychologicalFlexibility

  • InFlexaHexACT Model of PsychopathologyLack of Values Clarity or ContactFusionInaction or Disorganised ActivityDominance of Conceptualised Past or Feared FutureExperiential AvoidanceAttachment to Storied or Conceptualised Self

  • HexaflexACT Model of Effective LivingValues, Purpose & MeaningDefusionCommitted ActionsContact with the Present MomentAcceptance & WillingnessTranscendent Sense of Self/ Self As ContextMindfulness & Acceptance Processes

    Behaviour Change Processes

  • Your turn!Decide who will be client firstBrief your partner on presenting problem, but not whats tricky about this clientCounsellor: Notice yourself getting stuck. Observe thoughts and feelingsClient: observe and resist urge to be agreeable or make it easy for counsellorIf counsellor is not getting stuck, brief client on what the actual client does thats tricky and try again. Switch.Pair up - one is A the other is B

  • Getting Stuck Into Getting StuckMy experience is not authoritative because it is infallible. It is the basis of authority because it can always be checked in new primary ways. In this way its frequent error or fallibility is always open to correction. Carl Rogers, On Becoming a Person

  • Bennet and CariNotice your reactions and make peace with themProvide an ACT-consistent responseWhere is the client on the Hexaflex?Where are you on the Hexaflex?

  • 7 Frequent ProblemsWhat do I do if I get stuck?Do I need to cover all 6 processes?What if they say it didnt work?What if they dont know/cant say what their values are or dont have any?What do I do with clients who are sceptical/concrete/psychotic?What if they (or I!) dont get Self-As-Context?What do I do with clients who are fused with their beliefs or a sick or victim role?

  • What do I do if I get stuck?

    General principles:Slow down!Be willing and acceptingHold your formulation and treatment trajectory lightlyStick closely to principles and loosely to techniquesListen to clients experience before yoursListen to experience before models and ideasInvite a change in action rather than in understanding or feeling

  • Do I need to cover all 6 processes?No!

  • What if they say it didnt work? Is there a control agenda in place?Try another part of the modelTry a different technique from the same part

  • What if they dont know/cant say what their values are or dont have any?How do they know they dont know?When was the earliest (last) time they remember having values?Make the therapy about discovering/creating values?Check for semantic problemsDetect values in the present

  • What do I do with clients who are sceptical/concrete/psychotic? Trust your experience, not my words or your thoughtsWorkability of scepticismSideline beliefs and being right for a whileYou dont have to do mindfulness just pay attentionPsychosis ACT is not an EST other treatmentsMetaphor-imperviousness? Present-moment defusion and willingness with Self-As-Context

  • What if they (or I!) dont get Self-As-Context?Lets practise!

  • Indicators Of Increased Capacity For Self-As-ContextDetecting and defusing from rules and storiesIncreased perspective taking and noticingNoticing own processes of fusion and unwillingnessNaming or joking about own scripts and storiesAble to dispassionately examine value-contradictory behaviours and thoughtsRecognising current choices and history as separate phenomenaRelating to multiple conceptualisations of self as determined by context and values-in-the-moment

  • What if they are fused with their beliefs or a sick or victim role? Try Self-As-ContextBe curious and empathicAppeal to workability

  • Template for Experiential ExercisesRecognise your mind will interfere, so slow down and acceptContact with present moment sounds and touchLocate the moment of choice or stucknessImmerse in the moment (file cabinet or movie screen)Open eyes and express itHold the moment silently and appreciate

  • The Grid - Kevin PolkEven Simpler Model of ACT ProcessesSwSValued LivingSensory ExperienceMental Experience

  • I think that...

    Im having the thought that...I notice Im having the thought that...This is unbearableI notice those thoughts are there again

  • Recontextualising the ProblemThe Life Im left with

    For Sweet Spot & Client Descending, add a template for How to develop these kinds of exercisesCan use GUIDE FOR AN INITIAL ACT SESSION If this helps you get startedRogers quote: Nothing to do with getting stuck.

    Value of getting stuck: Committed action is not about not falling down on the climb up the mountain, its about continually getting up again

    The expertise literature (more to come about that in the afternoon) says you learn by exposing your mistakes to correction

    Bike-riding metaphor. How do you keep your balance when youre riding a bike? Trick question you dont!Notice your own cognitive and emotional response to what the client says. Take a moment to accept and make peace with these feelings and to observe these thoughtsProvide a response that acknowledges the client's position and provides a bridge to one of the Hexaflex pointsWhat ACT process is going on with the client (that warrants your attention)?What ACT process is going on with you?Demonstrate with a volunteer if there is time or offer to come back to this.Respect the context in which you are working and the clients treatment goals. To some extent the latter are negotiable anyway who doesnt want a richer, more vital and meaningful life? Clients are only stuck in how theyre trying to achieve that (get fixed first and the EA agenda). From the research lit on ACT it seems as though the approach is robust enough that leaving bits of the Hexaflex out doesnt prevent good outcomes.Invite participants to give examples. Who has had clients say this? What did they say? What were your therapeutic goals?

    CONTROL AGENDA: You or the client are trying to change or avoid an experience/feeling?ANOTHER PART: Sometimes what your formulation is off and they will respond to a different part of the model better. The main thing is to keep things flowing, not get stuckDIFFERENT TECHNIQUE: Some people just dont respond to certain exercises. Or maybe the exercise doesnt suit you.

    IF YOU SAY IT DIDNT WORK: What was your agenda? And why arent you just moving on?How do they know they dont know? Where do they go to determine the answer to this problem? Check that its not into their feelings or comparisons with others/idealised self/ rules etc.

    Semantic problems? E.g. they think of values as something given by society, parents, scripture, or other rule source. i.e. theyre not the author and chooser of them.

    Detect values in the present: What purpose do they have in being in therapy here with you today? There is so much else you could be doing, why this? What matters? Who will be positively affected if they change?

    ALL of this with an invitational attitude.

    Workability of scepticism: What is it costing you? How is life working when you follow the rules of a sceptic?

    Psychosis: What ACT does have to offer increasing clients capacity to tolerate the distress occasioned by the symptoms

    Emphasise small steps and relational shifts: to the symptoms and small steps = behavioral change

    Metaphor problems? Perspective-taking challenges from ABI/ developmental difficulties/ psychosis but present moment is always there, so what can client practise willingness in the presence of?

    Don't get Self-As-Context

    "I'm not that" exercise - whole group"Observer Self" exercise - demo with s.o. who doesn't get it"Who are you?" exercise pairsIf time, Conversational demo - "Who is noticing that? Who is saying that? Who answered that question?"The ability to see rules and stories about one's life as just verbal formulations, not as determinative of one's choices

    Increased ability to take or notice the perspective of others

    Increased ability to notice the appearance of old rules or the process of being 'hooked' by one's own thoughts

    *Naming and joking about scripts and stories

    Able to examine patterns of thinking and behaviour that have been contrary to one's values

    Recognising that while one's history may bring difficulties, it doesnt define one or one's choices and that valued choices are always possible

    Relating flexibly to multiple conceptualisations of self depending on context and on values being lived

    Curious and empathic: Help me understand. Can we just dwell in the space of this conflict or choice without rushing to either conclusion? Demonstrate if a volunteer and there is time.

    Workability: How is it going with the belief and getting a life that you love? "Gee, that all sounds reasonable, and yet there's this difficulty you keep encountering...

    And if theres time do Demonstrate with a volunteer if there is time or offer to come back to this from Slide 10 How do you get stuck and what do you do?

    Promise that after lunch youll get to experience staying with being stuck.

    Recognise your mind will interfere, so slow down and accept

    Contact with present moment sounds and touch

    Locate the moment of choice or stuckness

    Immerse in the moment (file cabinet or movie screen)

    Open eyes and express it. SLOW RIGHT DOWN YOU FIRST AND THEN THE CLIENT

    Hold the moment silently and appreciate TRAIN THE CLIENT TO DEFUSE DURING THIS

    Healthy living = Acceptance of and response to sensory experience, with actions guided by values.Pathology = Fusion and overinvolvement with Mental Experience and actions directed into struggling with suffering

    If time - do this:Simply draw The Grid for your client and explain that to the right are behaviors or actions toward values, important things like health, relationships, etc. To the left are behaviors away from unwanted mental experiences like anxiety and depression. Explain that all humans do both kinds of behaviors. Above the left line write the following:I ________ for ___________. I ________ for _________. action suffering action valueHave the person fill in the action blanks with the same action, but the suffering and value blanks are filled with an unwanted mental experience (suffering) and value. For example, one might sleep for depression or sleep for health. One might walk for anxiety or walk for health. One might talk for anger or one might talk for friendship. Once the person has filled in the blanks ask, "Is there a difference between doing that action to move away from suffering and doing that action to move toward a value?" Most people will immediately notice the difference between moving toward and moving away. If not, keep training until the difference is noticed.3 Step defusion of troublesome thoughts1. I think that this suffering is unbearable2. You could say though, that im having the thought that this suffering is unbearable.3. You could also NOTICE that you are there having the thought.4. It looks like the thought appears out of nowhere. Just like when you open your eyes, there is the world.5. As soon as that unbearable thought appears, so does everything else associated with it. [RFs]6. But there is a mind there having the thoughts. In a sense you contain them, so you are not them...7. ...and can observe your mind having them. [Then go on to choose value-consistent actions in their presence.]