40
P: 2005 University of Missouri Ken Macro – California Polytechnic State University Management, empowerment, and quality initiatives: Positive Transformation of the Inplant through Lean Principles and Sustainability.

ACUP: 2005 University of Missouri Ken Macro – California Polytechnic State University Management, empowerment, and quality initiatives: Positive Transformation

  • View
    213

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

Management, empowerment, and quality initiatives:  Positive Transformation of the Inplant through Lean Principles and Sustainability.

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

“New opinions are always suspect, and usually opposed, without any other reason but because they are not already common.” John Locke

“If you want to succeed you should strike out on new paths, rather that travel worn paths of accepted success.” John D. Rockefeller

A Paradigmatic Shift…a time for change!

“You must predict the death of your own market inOrder to save the market.” Frank Romano

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

Growth Opportunities1. Growing Print Niches (direct market printing)2. Digital/Toner-based Printing3. Ancillary Services (>10yrs will become 20-25% of

budget)4. ExportsThreats1. USPS Rates (how is this going to affect your

operations?)2. Global Competition-Print Imports3. Paper Prices

Davis, Ronnie. (2005). Over the horizon: An environmental scan for 2005 and 2006. GATFWorld (17/1). Sewickley,PA: Graphic Arts Technical Foundation

2005 PIA/GATF Technology Forecast

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

IMPLICATIONS FOR STRATEGIES and OPERATIONS

1. Manufacturing Efficiency (profit leaders 3% more efficient)

2. Support Efficiency (profit leaders 12% more efficient)

3. Be a Learning Organization4. Focus on Ancillary Services (7% of total print

revenues)

Davis, Ronnie. (2005). Over the horizon: An environmental scan for 2005 and 2006. GATFWorld (17/1). Sewickley,PA: Graphic Arts Technical Foundation

2005 PIA/GATF Technology Forecast

PRINT PLANTS CONTINUE TO DECLINE

- 1994 53,000 print plants- 2005 less than 45,000 (decline of 15%)- Predicts that 1,300 plants will close in 2005-2006

“The reduction in number of plants does not mean that industry

overcapacity is falling. In fact, the surviving plants are more

productive making for more overcapacity” (Davis, 2005)

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

“The focus is not only developing new skills; it is also on how to

learn new skills, knowledge, and capability—learning how to

learn.”Darren Dolcemascolo (2004)

Dolcemascolo, D. (2004). Lean and the learning organization. Retrieved February 2, 2005 from http://www.emsstrategies.com

Be a Learning Organization

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

-A philosophy-A series of applications-An opportunity for unified engagement-A system of productivity techniques-A system of quality improvement concepts-A way in which to define value from a customer’s perspective-An application that creates culture, engages everyone and encourages continual change and improvement.

What is Lean?

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

“If you had to leave my house this second and immediately begin the task of getting four new tiresPut on your car, filling the gas tank to the top, cleaning the windshield, and then drinking seven ounces of water, how long do guess it would take?”

“Which car in the Indianapolis 500 race wins?

What is Lean?

Answer: “it is not the fastest car that wins. It is usually is the car that spends the least amount ofTime in the pits. And what happens in the pits? That’s where they replace all four tires, fill the gas tank, clean the windshield and give the driver seven ounces of water to drink all in less than nine seconds.”

Feingold, J. (2005). Getting lean. Fort Wayne, IN: WCM Associates.

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

Many of the ideas embodied in Lean are derived from the concepts proposed by Frederic Taylor, Frank and Lillian Gilbreth, Henry Ford, William Deming, and others.

Emerged from Japan (Post WWII):- Kiichiro Toyoda- Taiichi Ohno (Why-Why) and Shigeo Shingo

(JIT)- Incorporated Ford production practices of

Ishikawa, Deming, and Juran into Toyota Production System (1949-1975)

Brought to North America through Ohno and Shingo’s books

History of Lean

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

Lean is a systematic approach to enhancing value of a product or service while reducing and eliminating waste both in the manufacturing and non-manufacturing components of a company

Lean Defined

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

1. The workplace is safe, orderly, and immaculately clean

2. Products are build just in time, and only to customer demand

3. Six sigma quality is built into the product and process99.9996% perfection – 3.4 ppm failed (parts per million)

4. Empowered work teams make key decisions on the shop floor and in supporting functions

5. Visual management techniques are used to spread critical information throughout the factory

6. There is a relentless pursuit of perfection

The Philosophical Core of Lean

Henderson, B.A., Larco, J.L. (2003). Lean Transformation. Richmond, VA: The Oaklea Press

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

Lean Principles1. Kaizen (continuous improvement)2. 6S3. Muda (identification and elimination of

waste)4. Visual Management5. Value Stream Mapping6. VOC (voice of the customer)7. Takt time (beat)8. Data Collection9. Pull System10.TPM (total productive maintenance)11.Work Cell Optimization (single piece flow)12.SMED (single minute exchange of dies)13.Kanbans

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

Lean PrinciplesIn a truly lean system, everyone—

subcontractors, first-tier suppliers,systems integrators or assemblers,

distributors, customers, employeescan see everything so it’s easy to discover

ways to create value. Also there is instant and positive feedback for

employees making improvements, a key feature of lean work and

a powerful element tocontinuous improvement. Darren

Dolcemascolo (2004)

Dolcemascolo, D. (2004). Lean overview. Retrieved February 2, 2005 from http://www.emsstrategies.com

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

Kaizen (Continuous Improvement)A management philosophy

emphasizing employee participation, In which every process is continuously

evaluated andRe-valuated for the elimination of

waste.

How to hold a Kaizen event:1. Select a subject for the event2. Select and assemble the team3. Affirm management’s commitment4. Preset the road map5. Train the team6. Perform the “present state” analysis7. The “next step” proposal should be generated8. The team presents its action plan to management9. Assign the action items10. Track activities and results using visual management boards11. Implement the changes12. Measure the improvement and report results13. Say “Thank You.”

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

Kaizen (Continuous Improvement)

ANALYZE

Characterize currentAnd future states

Develop Action Plan

DevelopRecommendations

PrioritizeOpportunities

Develop Approach

PLAN

VERIFY ACT

Recognize futureopportunities

Analyze and validate

Implement Solutions

Test and verify solutions

Create and refine solutionsCharter the TeamAnd Mission

Develop Knowledgepool

The KaizenLoop

Daily, K.W. (2005). Lean manufacturing handbook. DW Publishing Co.

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

1. 6S (formerly 5S)A system designed to organize and

standardize a workplace- Sort (Seiri)- Set in Order (Seiton)- Shine (Seison)- Standardize (Seiketsu)- Sustain (Shitsuke)- Safety (Anzen)

Safe Clean Organized Work Environment

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

6SA methodology for organizing, cleaning,

developing, andsustaining a productive work

environment.

Sort – Get rid of clutterSet in Order – Organize the work area “a place for

everything and everything in its place.”Shine – Clean, neat, and orderly (encourage pride in

ownership)Standardize – Establish written standards for order and

cleanlinessSustain – Maintain standards through training,

empowerment, commitment and disciplineSafety – Continuously make aware and enforce a safe

working environment.

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

- Improved morale- Improved quality and profitability- Space- Safety- Reduced motion waste: any movement of people or

machines without adding value to the product.- Structure for sustaining order

- Eliminate the “erosion of improvements”- Not about housekeeping – it is about “zero housekeeping”

Benefits of 6S

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

The Philosophy: The identification and elimination of waste for the value stream is the central theme of LEAN.

Successful implementation requires that the entire workforce be trained in identifying and eliminating waste from their work.Waste exists at all levels in the organization. Effectiveness is the collective integration of man, method, material, and machine.

1. Over-production2. Wait time3. Transportation4. Processing5. Inventory6. Motion7. Defects

“Muda” and the 7 Wastes

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

1. Over-production

2. Wait time

3. Transportation

4. Processing

The Seven WastesProducing more than is needed, faster than needed or before it is needed (JIT Theory)Idle time that occurs when codependent events are not fully synchronizedAny material movement that does not directly support immediate production

Redundant effort which adds no value to a product or service (transparent to customer or which customer would be unwilling to pay for)

Automation in the wrong placesCost Accounting PracticesLength of communicationLengthy set-up timesLow up-times, Poor planningInconsistent work methodsLack of proper equipment or materialsLong set-up timesPoor equipment maintenanceProduction bottle-necksImproper facility layoutLarge lot processingLarge lot purchasingPoor production planningPoor work place organization

Decision making at inappropriate levelsInefficient policies and proceduresLack of customer input concerning requirement

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

5. Inventory

6. Motion

7. Defects

The Seven WastesAny supply in excess of process requirements necessary to produce goods or services in a JIT manner

Any movement of people which does not contribute added value to the product or serviceRepair or rework of a product or service to fulfill customer requirements as well as scrap waste resulting from make-ready.

Inaccurate forecastingIncapable processIncapable suppliersLong changeover timesPoor inventory trackingUnbalanced production processes

Ineffective equipmentLack of visual controls (VMB, Kanbans)Poor process documentationPoor workplace organization

Excessive variationHigh inventory levelsInadequate tools or equipmentIncapable processesInsufficient trainingPoor layouts unnecessary handling

Daily, K.W. (2005). Lean manufacturing handbook. DW Publishing Co.

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

“Lean thinking therefore must start with a conscious attempt to precisely define value in terms of specific products with specific capabilities offered at specific prices through a dialogue with specific customers. The way to do this is to ignore existing assets and technologies and to rethink firms on a product-line basis with strong, dedicated product teams. This also requires redefining the role for a firm’s technical experts and rethinking just where in the world to create value.” James Womack

Value

Womack, J. & Jones, D. (2003). Lean thinking. New York, NY: Free Press.

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

Value Stream Mapping

1. Visually documents a process

2. Provides fact-based process description as basis for understanding current problems

3. Enables teams to quickly see improvements within the process and begin defining critical Xs (underlying causes)

4. Helps team see how a process should work once they eliminate waste

5. Helps communicate inside and outside the organization

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

Visual Management

“Visual management is critical to achieving truly empowered

employees. Empowerment is not possible without information,

and the best way to insure that information is available is

through simple visual management techniques”

(Henderson & Larco, 2003).

The strategy of providing visual information on daily activities available for everyone in the workplace.-Shadow boards-Visual display boards (safety, 6S rating, Quality, training, SOPs, On-time delivery, etc)-Cell production status board (set-up times, TPM, etc)-Red tag, yellow tag identification

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

Visual Management Board – 6S

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

QUAD’s “Island of Excellence”

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

Activity Board

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

Visual Management

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

Pull“In the next few years, printing firms can

learn to quickly print up smalllots of books and distribution warehouses can

learn to replenishbookstore shelves frequently. Eventually new

‘right sized’ book printing technologies may come along and make it

possible to simply print out the books the customer wants at the moment the

customer asks for them, either in a bookstore or, even better, in the

customer’s office or home. And some customers may not want a physical

copy of their ‘book’ at all, Instead, they will request the electronic

transfer of the text from the ‘publisher’ to their own computer, printing

out an old-fashioned paper version only if they happen to need it. The

appropriate solution will found once the members of the publishing value

stream embrace the fourth principle of lean thinking: pull.

(Womack & Jones, 2003, p.25, para. 2).

Womack, J. & Jones, D. (2003). Lean thinking. New York, NY: Free Press.

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

Total Productive MaintenanceA systematic approach to eliminate

downtime of equipmentFive Pillars of TPM1. Autonomous maintenance – to clean2. Maintenance mindset and training – to detect3. Planned maintenance system – to correct4. Overall equipment effectiveness – to perfect5. Early equipment management system – to protect

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

Total Productive MaintenanceProgram requires operators to be

responsible for cleaningand inspecting, lubricating, performing

precision checks,and other light maintenance tasks.

Benefits:1. Increases overall equipment effectiveness using improvement activities2. Establishes autonomous maintenance engaging equipment operators3. Established a planned maintenance system4. Requires training to improve operation and maintenance skills5. Institutes a system for preventive maintenance6. Eliminates breakdown losses

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

“Lean organizations create a culture of continuous improvement, and

within that culture, they employ tools of lean to eliminate waste. Not

surprisingly, it begins with the customer (not the plant manager or

industrial engineer). The customer is the definer of value.”

Darren Dolcemascolo (2004)

Implementing a Lean Culture

Dolcemascolo, D. (2004).Implementing lean. Retrieved February 2, 2005 from http://www.emsstrategies.com

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

Plant Wide Communications

Implementing a Lean Initiative

Plant-wide meetings with

To local management at

Least monthly. Visual

communication of plant

vision, goals, and

performance has started.

Plant-wide andDepartmental

meetings As often as

daily. Two way

communication.

Goals and performance

are understood and

known by everyone.

Plant-wide meetings

with to localmanagement

at leastMonthly. Allcommunication

is onewayEmployee

EmpowermentEmployees are

expectedto “manage”

their workarea. Everyone

isencouraged toparticipate, but

middlemanagers andsupervisors and

roadblocks.

Employeesuggestions

systemstarted.

Work force feels like

owners. Integrated self

managed work teams.

Improvements implemented

withoutdirect

management

involvement.

None, generally an

adversarial relationship,

characterized by

blaming and finger

pointing. No one on the

shop floor is expected

to use anything other

than “arms & legs” in

the performance of the

job.

Traditional Facility

Facility in Transition

Profit Leaders

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

Quality

Implementing a Lean Initiative

QA department enforcer

of quality program

Supplier certification

program in place.

Everyone has “time”

stopping capability.

Error proofing prevents

defects from occurring,

Employees treat all

downstream operations

like customers. Quality

measurements only

meaningful in ppm.

Quality less important

than costs or schedules.

Emphasis is ondetection of

errors.Everyone

thinks quality

is the responsibility of

the QC Department

Shop Floor Management

Supervisors feel threatened as responsibility

and accountability

is pushed down to the

people on the

shop floor. Cop management

mentality is

replaced with trust and

respect.

Supervisors converted to

trainers, coaches, and

facilitators. Machine

operators give plant

tours to customers

Supervisors used as

cops in direct labor

reporting system. Idle

machines viewed as a

problem. Scrap, rework

and downtime are

considered a cost of

doing business.

Traditional Facility

Facility in Transition

Profit Leaders

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

Training

Implementing a Lean Initiative

Some training available

to management.

Continuous and on-going

training in place and

available to everyone.

Training requirements

established for everyone.

No formal training

except as required by

law.

Time required 3-8 years withcommitted

management

Continuous improvement

techniques (Kaizen) must

be in place to hold

position. Benchmarks

change daily.

5-10 years with

committed management

Traditional Facility

Facility in Transition

Profit Leaders

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

Tool Kit Comparison

Source: LEARNING and PRODUCTIVITY Pty. Ltd.

Major CPITools 6σ Kaizen Lean Description

Cp/Cpk 4 Process capability assessmentDOE 4 Design of experimentsSPC 4 Process control based on statistics and data analysisFMEA 4 Risk assessment toolRegression 4 Correlate effect one variable has on anotherProcess Map 4 4 4 Map process steps to communicate and identify opportunities5 whys /2 hows 4 4 4 Determination methods for root cause discoveryPareto 4 4 4 Column chart ranking items highest to lowestFishbone 4 4 4 Cause / Effect Diagram5s 4 4 Elimination wasteVisual Mgmt 4 4 4 Emphasis on visual techniques to manage processPoka-Yoke 4 4 Error proofing techniquesSpaghetti Chart 4 4 Visual production process mapKanban 4 4 Material storage technique used to control processTakt Time 4 4 Determine pace or beat of a processStd Work 4 4 Evaluate tasks done during a processSMED 4 4 Single minute exchange of dies - Quick machine set upTPM 4 Integrate maintenance strategy with processCellular Flow 4 Reduce inventory & cycle time through process layout and pull production techniques

2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

“Lean Leaders have the knowledge and are well versed in the definitions and methods of Lean. They embrace radically different structures, strategies, and day-to-day processes to operate more effectively than ever dreamed. And they can do it within a timeframe and a positive culture that gets sustainable results.”

Susan Kelly

Kelly, S.L. (2003). Lean enterprise: From manufacturing to selling. Gravure (10).

A Paradigmatic Shift…a time for change!

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

“Our earnest advice to lean firms today is simple: To hell with your competitors; compete against perfection by identifying all activities that are muda and eliminating them. This is an absolute rather than a relative standard which can provide the essential North Star for any organization (in its most spectacular application, it has kept the Toyota organization in the lead for forty years). However, to put this admonition to work you must master the techniques for eliminating muda.”

James Womack & Daniel Jones (2003)

A Paradigmatic Shift…a time for change!

Womack, J. & Jones, D. (2003). Lean thinking. New York, NY: Free Press.

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

Thank you for your time…Enjoy the rest of the conference!

Think Lean,Empower lean,Coach lean,And Sustain lean.

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

SourcesDailey, K.W. (2004). The lean manufacturing employee training manual. Tampa, FL: DW Publishing. Emiliani, M.L. (2003). Better thinking, better results: Using the power of lean as a total business solution. Kensington, CT: The Center for Lean Business Management. Epstein, R. (1996). Creativity Games for Trainers: A handbook of group activities forjumpstarting workplace creativity. New York, NY: Training McGraw-Hill. Feingold, J. (2005). Getting lean. Fort Wayne, IN: WCM Associates. George, M.L., Rowlands, D., Price, M., & Maxey, J. (2005). The lean six sigma pocket toolbook. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Gilpatrick, K.E., & Furlong, B. (2004). The elusive lean enterprise. Victoria, BC: Trafford. Henderson, B.A., & Larco, J.L, (2003). Lean Transformation: How to change your business into a lean enterprise. Richmond, VA: Oaklea Press. Kaydos, W. (1991). Measuring, managing, and maximizing performance: What every manager needs to know about quality and productivity to make real improvements in performance. Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press. Kelly. S. (2003). Lean enterprise: From manufacturing to selling. Gravure (October). 56-59. Kotter, J.P. (1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Payne, V. (2001). The team-building workshop: A trainer’s guide. New York, NY: AMACOM. Rizzo, K.E. (2001). Total Productive Maintenance: A guide for the printing industry (2nd ed.). Pittsburgh, PA: GATFPress. Wireman, T. (1991). Total productive maintenance: An American approach. New York, NY: Industrial Press. Wireman, T. (2004). Total productive maintenance. New York, NY: Industrial Press. Womack, J.P., & Jones, D.T. (2003). Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. New York, NY: Free Press.

AC

UP:

20

05

Un

ivers

ity o

f M

isso

uri

Ken M

acr

o –

Calif

orn

ia P

oly

tech

nic

Sta

te U

niv

ers

ity

Other Sources

Likert, J. K. (2004). The Toyota Way. New York, NY: McGraw Hill

www.emsstrategies.com