53
Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

Accounting and Auditing Standards Update

June 2, 2011

Jennifer Smith, CPA

Scott Yandle, CPA

Page 2: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

Objectives for Session

• Educate and inform you about the new accounting pronouncements that will be in effect for the current year or will be in effect in the future.

• Discuss the impact the new accounting pronouncements will have on financial reporting.

Page 3: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

Charity Care

• EITF Issue No.09-L issued August, 2010

• Effective for fiscal years beginning after 12/15/10 with early adoption permitted

• Required to use cost as the measurement basis for charity care disclosures, based on the direct and indirect costs of providing the charity care

• Required to disclose a description of method used to calculate cost

• Required to disclose reimbursements received intended to compensate for providing charity care

3

Page 4: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

GASB Codification P80 (formerly GASB 20)

• If your Governmental Hospital has elected to apply GASB Codification P80 (formerly GASB 20) then:

- The Hospital should apply all FASB Statements and Interpretations issued after November 30, 1989, except for those that CONFLICT with or CONTRADICT GASB pronouncements

- http://www.gasb.org/tech/index.html

4

Page 5: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

ASC 805Business Combination

(Formerly SFAS 164)

5

Page 6: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

Not-for-Profit – Mergers and Acquisitions

• Effective Date• Effective for mergers occurring on

or after December 15, 2009• Effective for acquisitions for which

the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2009.

6

Page 7: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

• Acquisition “is a combination in which a not-for-profit acquirer obtains control of one or more nonprofit activities or businesses (The formation of a new entity is not a significant factor in assessing whether one entity has obtained control over another.)”’

Not-for-Profit – Mergers and Acquisitions

7

Page 8: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

• Acquisition• Similar to prior guidance (formerly SFAS 141R), with

exceptions made due to unique NFP considerations• Goodwill recognized only if substantial portion of revenues are

supported from exchange transactions (business-type entity)

• Donor relationships not recognized as separate intangible

• No recognition of conditional promises to give unless criteria under Topic 958 (formerly SFAS 116) met at acquisition

• No amortization of goodwill – evaluate each year for impairment

• Applies to goodwill previously recorded as well – beginning with 12/31/10 year end entities

Not-for-Profit – Mergers and Acquisitions

8

Page 9: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

• Acquisition Examples• Physician practice

• Purchase price of $1,000,000 and company value (net of identifiable assets and liabilities assumed) of $850,000 = goodwill of $150,000

• Goodwill of $150,000 tested annually for impairment

• Foundation• Purchase price of $1,000,000 and company value

(net of identifiable assets and liabilities assumed) of $850,000

• No goodwill recorded – difference recorded through statement of activities in year of acquisition

Not-for-Profit – Mergers and Acquisitions

9

Page 10: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

• Merger “is a transaction or other event in which the governing bodies of two or more not-for-profit entities cede control of those entities to create a new not-for-profit entity. If the participating entities retain shared control of the new entity, they have not ceded control. To qualify as a new entity, the combined entity must have a newly formed governing body; a new entity often is, but need not be, a new legal entity.”

Not-for-Profit – Mergers and Acquisitions

10

Page 11: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

• Merger• Governing bodies cede control to create

new NFP• Likely to be rare – neither predecessor entity can

retain control – e.g. current board/trustee representation, etc. ceases

• Use “Carryover Method”• Similar to pooling of interests except start from merger

date (the new entities initial reporting date) vs. beginning of period

• No Goodwill

Not-for-Profit – Mergers and Acquisitions

11

Page 12: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial

Statements (ASC 810‐10‐65‐1, Transition Related to

FASB Statement No. 160)

12

Page 13: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

Minority Interest• Requires all entities to report non-

controlling (minority) interests in subsidiaries in the same way—as equity in the consolidated financial statements.

• For not-for-profit entities, this is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December15, 2009.

13

Page 14: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

Minority Interest• This statement shall be applied

prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which this statement is initially applied, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements.

• The presentation and disclosure requirements shall be applied retrospectively for all periods presented.

14

Page 15: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

Minority Interest

20X3 20X2Assets:

Cash $ 570,000 $ 475,000Accounts receivable 125,000 110,000Investment securities 125,000 120,000Plant and equipment 220,000 235,000Total assets $1,040,000 $ 940,000

Liabilities:Total liabilities $ 555,000 $ 459,000

Unrestricted net assetsHospital A 459,000 433,000Noncontrolling interest in Subsidiary A 26,000 48,000Total unrestricted net assets 485,000 481,000Total liabilities and net assets $ 1,040,000 $ 940,000

Hospital AConsolidated Statement of Financial Position

As of December 31

15

Page 16: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

Minority Interest

20X3 20X2

Unrestricted revenues, gains and other supportNet patient service revenue $ 390,000 $ 355,000

Contributions 5,000 5000Net assets released from donors’restrictions used for operations - -Total revenues, gains and other support 395,000 360,000

Patient care and other operating expenses 366,000 337,000Excess of revenues over expenses

(from continuing operations) 29,000 23,000Discontinued operations of Subsidiary A, net - (7,000)Change in net unrealized gains and losses

on other than trading securities 5,000 15,000Sale of Subsidiary A shares to noncontrolling

shareholders - 15,000Purchase of Subsidiary A shares from

noncontrolling shareholders (30,000) -Increase in unrestricted net assets $ 4,000 $ 81,000

Hospital AConsolidated Statement of Operations andOther Changes in Unrestricted Net Assets

As of December 31

16

Page 17: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

Minority InterestHospital A

Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsChanges in Consolidated Unrestricted Net Assets

Attributable to Hospital A and Transfers (to) from the Noncontrolling InterestYear End December 31

Controlling NoncontrollingTotal Interest Interest

Balance January 1, 20X2 $400,000

$400,000

$ -

Excess of revenue over expenses(from continuing operations)

23,000 17,6005,400

Discontinued operations, net of tax(7,000) (5,600)

(1,400)

Change in net unrealized gains and losses on other than trading

securities 15,000 12,0003,000

Sale of Subsidiary A sharesto noncontrolling shareholders

50,000 9,00041,000

Change in net assets81,000 33,000

48,000

Balance December 31, 20X2 $481,000

$433,000

$ 48,000

Excess of revenue over expenses(from continuing operations)

29,000 27,5001,500

Change in net unrealized gains and losses on other than trading

securities 5,000 4,500500

Sale of Subsidiary A sharesto noncontrolling shareholders

(30,000) (6,000)(24,000)

Change in net assets4,000 26,000

(22,000

Balance December 31, 20X3 $485,000

$459,000

$ 26,000

17

Page 18: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

ASU No. 2010-24: Healthcare Entities (Topic 954)

Presentation of Insurance Claims and Related Insurance Recoveries

18

Page 19: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

ASU No. 2010-24

• Effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2010– Early application is permitted

19

Page 20: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

ASU No. 2010-24

• Applies to all healthcare entities

• Issued to address diversity in practice of accounting for medical malpractice and similar claims and their related insurance recoveries– Gross versus net

20

Page 21: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

ASU No. 2010-24• Clarifies that healthcare entities should not net

insurance recoveries against related claim liabilities– Entity should evaluate its exposure to losses arising from

claims and recognize a liability apart from any anticipated insurance recoveries.

– If the entity is indemnified for losses, it should recognize a receivable at the same time, measured on the same basis as the related liability, subject to the need for a valuation allowance for uncollectible amounts.

21

Page 22: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

ASU No. 2010-28: Intangibles – Goodwill and Other

(Topic 350)

22

Page 23: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

ASU No. 2010-28

• For nonpublic entities, this is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Nonpublic entities may elect to adopt the provisions for periods beginning after December 15, 2010.

• Affects entities that have recognized goodwill and have one or more reporting units whose carrying value is zero or negative

23

Page 24: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

ASU No. 2010-28

• Goodwill impairment testing involves 2 steps (no change)• Step 1: Assess whether the carrying

amount of goodwill exceeds fair value• Step 2: Determine whether goodwill

has been impaired, and if so, calculate the amount of impairment

24

Page 25: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

ASU No. 2010-28

• Entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists

• In determining “more likely than not,” the entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating impairment

25

Page 26: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

ASU No. 2010-28

• Examples of when impairment might be more likely than not:• A significant adverse change in legal

factors or in the business climate• An adverse action or assessment by a

regulator• Unanticipated competition• A loss of key personnel

26

Page 27: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

ASU No. 2010-28

• Examples of when impairment might be more likely than not (continued):• A more-likely-than-not expectation that

a reporting unit or a significant portion of a reporting unit will be sold or otherwise disposed of

• The testing for recoverability of a significant asset group within a reporting unit

27

Page 28: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

ASU No. 2010-28

• Examples of when impairment might be more likely than not (continued):• Recognition of a goodwill impairment

loss in the financial statements of a subsidiary that is a component of a reporting unit

28

Page 29: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

Intangible Assets(GASB Codification Section 1400 -

formerly GASB 51)

29

Page 30: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

GASB Codification 1400 (formerly GASB 51) Accounting and Financial Reporting for Intangible Assets

• Intangible assets lack physical substance, is non-financial in nature and has an initial useful life extending beyond a single reporting period.

• These assets include easements, computer software, water rights, timber rights, patents, and trade marks

• Goodwill is explicitly excluded from the scope of GASB Codification 1400.

30

Page 31: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

Accounting and Financial Reporting for Derivative Instruments

(GASB Codification D40 – formerly GASB 53)

31

Page 32: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

GASB Codification D40 (formerly GASB No. 53) – Accounting and Financial Reporting for Derivative Instruments

• Effective – for fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2009. (June 30, 2010 and afterwards) Earlier application is encouraged.

• Reason – to enhance the usefulness and comparability of derivative instrument information reported in the financial statements.

• Key – have to evaluate effectiveness of hedge to determine how entry is recorded.

32

Page 33: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

Effective hedge:• Balance Sheet entry, no longer adjust unrealized

gain/loss through “Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses)”

• Unrealized gain/loss gets classified as a “Deferred inflow/outflow of resources” on the Balance Sheet.

Ineffective hedge:• Adjust unrealized gain/loss through “Nonoperating

Revenues (Expenses)” with offsetting asset or liability recorded on the Balance Sheet

33

GASB Codification D40 (formerly GASB No. 53) – Accounting and Financial Reporting for Derivative Instruments

Page 34: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

Termination of Hedge Accounting:• Hedging derivative instrument fails to meet the criteria

for effectiveness (previous slides)• Likelihood that a hedged expected transaction will

occur is no longer probable• Hedged asset or liability is sold or retired• Hedging derivative instrument is terminated• Current refunding or advanced refunding resulting in

the defeasance of the hedged debt • Hedged expected transaction occurs

34

GASB Codification D40 (formerly GASB No. 53) – Accounting and Financial Reporting for Derivative Instruments

Page 35: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

Examples of Terminating Events:• Converting variable rate bonds to fixed rate bonds

(variable rate bonds had swap agreement)• Swap became an asset, and unrealized gain (loss) flows

through investment income

• Issuance of new bonds which refund existing bonds outstanding (bonds refunded had swap agreement)• At the time of refunding, the fair market value of the swap is

included in the calculation of the gain/loss on refunding and is amortized

• Going forward, the unrealized gain/loss flows through nonoperating revenues (expenses)

35

GASB Codification D40 (formerly GASB No. 53) – Accounting and Financial Reporting for Derivative Instruments

Page 36: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

OPEB Measurements by Agent Employers and Agent Multiple-

Employer Plans (GASB Codification P50 and Pe5 –

formerly GASB 57)

36

Page 37: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

GASB Codification P50 and Pe5 (formerly GASB 57) – Agent Employer Plans

• Introduces alternative measurement method for post retirement benefits other than pensions (formerly GASB 45 plans)

• Would save employers participating in agent multi employer plans or plans having less than 100 participants on cost of having actuarial valuations annually and coinciding with balance sheet date

37

Page 38: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

Effective Date

• Effective for periods beginning after June 15, 2011. Earlier implementation is encouraged.

38

Page 39: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

The Financial Reporting Entity: An Amendment of GASB

Statements No. 14 and No. 34 (GASB 61)

39

Page 40: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

GASB 61

• Effective for periods beginning after June 15, 2012. Earlier application is encouraged.• Will result in restatement in the initial

year of application

• Improves guidance for including, presenting, and disclosing information about component units and equity interest transactions

40

Page 41: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

GASB 61

• Amends Financial Accountability Concept• Must be fiscally dependent on primary

government (same as before)• A financial benefit or burden relationship must

also be present for the component unit to be included

41

Page 42: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

GASB 61

• If any one of these conditions exists, then there is a financial benefit or burden relationship:• Primary government is legally entitled to or

can otherwise access the organization’s resources

• Primary government is obligated in some manner for the debt of the organization

42

Page 43: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

GASB 61

• Financial Benefit or Burden Relationship (continued) –

• Primary government is legally obligated or has otherwise assumed the obligation to finance the deficits of, or provide financial support to, the organization

43

Page 44: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

GASB 61

• Amends Major Component Unit Requirements• Clarifies types of relationships that affect

determination of major component units• Eliminates requirement that the determination

include consideration of each component unit’s significance relative to other component units

44

Page 45: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

GASB 61• Amends the criteria for blending

component units• When the governing bodies of the two

entities are substantively the same, a financial benefit or burden must also exist for blending to occur

• Blending will occur for component units whose total debt outstanding is expected to be repaid entirely or almost entirely by the primary government

45

Page 46: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

GASB 61

• Amends requirements for reporting the funds of a blended component unit• For financial reporting purposes, funds of a

blended component unit have the same financial reporting requirements as the primary government

• Provides reporting guidance if the primary government is a business type activity that reports in a single column

46

Page 47: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

GASB 61

• Amends requirements for reporting equity interests in component units• Primary government must report an asset for

its equity interest in a discretely presented component unit

47

Page 48: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

GASB 61

• Amends note disclosures• Governments should disclose the rationale for

including each component unit and the manner in which it is included

48

Page 49: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

Codification of Accounting and Financial Reporting Guidance

Contained in Pre-November 1989 FASB and AICPA Pronouncements

(GASB 62)

49

Page 50: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

GASB 62

• Effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Earlier application is encouraged.

• Brings the accounting guidance together in one place

• Will eliminate the need for users to determine which FASB and AICPA pronouncements apply to governments

50

Page 51: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

GASB 62

• Going forward, governmental entities will just rely on GASB standards• If GASB doesn’t have a standard that

addresses the issue, then FASB codification can be used as an example and guide (but not authoritative)

51

Page 52: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

GASB 62

Specific topics addressed in GASB 62:

• Accounting changes and error corrections

• Capitalization of interest costs

• Contingencies• Extinguishments of debt• Imputation of interest

costs• Investments in common

stock

• Leases• Regulated operations• Special and

extraordinary items• Statement of net assets

classification

52

Page 53: Accounting and Auditing Standards Update June 2, 2011 Jennifer Smith, CPA Scott Yandle, CPA

Contact InformationJennifer Smith, Manager

[email protected]

Scott Yandle, Senior Associate864-213-5354

[email protected]

53