Upload
malcolm-quinn
View
216
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Acción Para la Salud: A Story about Community-Driven Research
Susan Kunz, MPH
Director of Platicamos Salud(Health and Wellness)
Mariposa Community Health CenterNogales, Arizona
Representing the Arizona Prevention Research Center
and the National Community Committee
Why Me?
I am a member of the National Community Committee
(NCC)
National Community Committee(NCC)
Community voice of the CDC Prevention Research Center Program
Community members who represent 37 PRCs
CDC PRCs
How Did I Get Involved in the NCC?
Elected by my Community Action Board (CAB)
Arizona Prevention Research Center (AzPRC)University of Arizona
Arizona Prevention Research Center
• Mission is to partner with communities to improve the health and well being of people living in US-Mexico Border States through research, training, and advocacy.
What does the U.S.-Mexico Border have to do with
Community Defined Measures?The AzPRC partnership exemplifies how good CBPR leads to good data.
Our Story…
2009 - We changed paths
10 years as a diabetes program intervention in 1 community to a CHW
policy intervention in multiple communities.
Why the New Direction?
2007 – AzPRC asked the CAB members to define the core research.
The community said:• Involve the entire border region • Focus on CHWs as change agents• Address social determinants through
policy
Wow, great idea!
How are we going to do that?
(Hmmm…sounds kind of soft. Will the CDC PRC Program fund that?)
We Dug Deep
Together we trusted each other to use key CBPR principles to reach our goal (Israel, 1998)
• Build on strengths and resources within the community
• Use a power-sharing process in all phases of research to address social inequities
• Achieve a balance between knowledge generation and intervention for mutual benefit
• Focus on local health with an ecological perspective to address social determinants
Specific Aim 1
To determine the effectiveness of integrating community advocacy into CHW outreach and education activities in increasing community-driven policy change related to chronic disease prevention within organizations, systems, and the broader social and physical environment in communities along the Arizona-Mexico Border.
• To create an evidence-based CHW advocacy model that provides a framework for community advocacy training and tracking, including indicators for measuring progress.
Specific Aim 2
Phase II: CHW Advocacy and Policy Intervention Efforts
Who Picked the Data?
Our Research Committee !!!•PRC staff•Representatives from all 7 community partners•5 intervention partners and 2 capacity building partners
What do We Want to Measure and How?
•Local ways and values (even if it slows the process down)•Multiple methods of data collection to tell our story•Demystify the policymaking process
(Minkler and Wallestein, Policy Link 2012 publication)
• Baseline (Phase I) and Follow-up Assessments
(Phase III) – National CHW community advocacy survey– Local CHW community advocacy survey– Local measure of organizational
commitment to community advocacy (Organizational Interview)
– Local measure of community engagement in advocacy (Community Interview)
Acción Activities
• Intervention activities (Phase II)
– Leadership and advocacy training (see Training PPT)
– CHW community advocacy and policy change
– CHW peer support network
– Technical assistance
Acción Activities
Back to the NCC
AzPRC followed CBPR Best Practice Principles
Recognized with NCC CBPR Best Practice Award
NCC CBPR Best Practice Award
• Created in 2010 to promote and recognize excellence in CBPR Practice
• XX PRCs have been awarded the two levels
– Community Engagement Certificate
– CBPR Best Practice Award
Bringining All Home
Promotora (CHW) Alicia Sander presenting outcomes at CCPH
Conference April 2012
To learn more: