A_CASE_STUDY

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/7/2019 A_CASE_STUDY

    1/9

    CASE STUDY

    DEVESH SHARMA

  • 8/7/2019 A_CASE_STUDY

    2/9

    Events in the Case Study

    Appointment

    Introduced to the company

    Meeting with GM and DGMYear Ending task

    Problems and Outcome

    The new approach

  • 8/7/2019 A_CASE_STUDY

    3/9

    INTRODUCTION

    ABC Engineering Works basically into Heavy Engineering Fabrication & Specialisation inmanufacturing machinery for Sugar and Cement Industry .

    The Factory was divided into Three parts:

    a) A Foundry shop

    b) A Machine shopc) A Fabrication shop

  • 8/7/2019 A_CASE_STUDY

    4/9

    INTRODUCTION (contd.)

    The Sales and Profit Figures were:

  • 8/7/2019 A_CASE_STUDY

    5/9

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    2000-01 2001-02 2003-04

    Sales (Rs. In billion)

    Sales (Rs. In billion)

  • 8/7/2019 A_CASE_STUDY

    6/9

    INDUCTION

    Induction process.

    Spent few days at various section of plants.

    Able to study internal problems & manufacturingprocess.

    Helped to prepare notes later on.

  • 8/7/2019 A_CASE_STUDY

    7/9

    POSITIVE INFERENCES

    Task oriented.

    Systematic approach in problem solving.

    Striving towards Betterment of the

    organization.

  • 8/7/2019 A_CASE_STUDY

    8/9

    DEVESH s FAULT

    Over -Enthusiastic.

    Hierarchy not followed by Devesh.

    Doing more than what is asked.

    Not taking advice of immediate Boss seriously.

    Too early to bring a change.

  • 8/7/2019 A_CASE_STUDY

    9/9

    Conclusion

    Use of wrong methodology.

    Great induction technique.

    Organizational structure.

    Need of a hierarchy.

    Managerial biases.