Abstraction, Integration, And Organization of Information for Display

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/2/2019 Abstraction, Integration, And Organization of Information for Display

    1/1

    Abstraction, Integration, and Organization of information for Display:Approach and Emerging MethodologiesA. Degani, M. Shafto & C. JorgensenNASA Ames Research Center,

    {adegani, mshafto}@mail.arc.nasa.gov

    L. OlsonSan Rafael, CA 94903,

    [email protected]

    Abstraction.TheDiagram ofthe London Underground (circa 1933).Data.

    Initial.

    Problem. Inspiration. Early.

    Final.

    Inspiration.

    Final.Early.

    Integration.

    Geographicalmap oft heLondon Underground (circa 1932)

    This organiza tion of the

    s et s w as i ns pi re d b y a

    diagramof the concentric

    arrangement ofhouses and

    s tor age huts in a typical

    Trobriand Island village

    ( Pa pu a N ew G ui n ea ),

    whichcorrespondsto the

    s oc i al s tr uc t ur e i n t he

    society.

    Thecurrent (2006)UndergroundDiagram .

    Becksorganizationschemefort heLondonUndergroundturned tobe flexibleenough

    toaccommodateallthenewstationsandlinesthatwereaddedsincethediagrams

    inception.It currentlysupportsthe prototypeofthe futurediagramwhich includesseveral

    additionallines.

    TheAldgate Triangle. a complex ofseveralstations, including theBank and Monument

    stationsthat areconnected throughan escalator. Thefigure isa sketchby HarryBeck from

    1965, showing fourdifferent solutionsfor thisdifficult integration problem.

    LEVELS OF SCALE

    ECHOS

    GRADIENTS

    NON-SEPARATENESS

    (CONNECTEDNESS)

    ROUGHNESS

    (NON-RIGID GRID)

    STRONG CENTERS

    INNER CALM &

    SIMPLICITY

    THE VOIDBOUNDARIES

    ALTERNATING

    REPETITIONS

    POSITIVE

    SPACE

    A canonical-correlation graph. Thegraphholdstwo patterns(thedarkisthepositive, thewhiteisthe

    negative)-- identifying a singlestatistical relationshipsbetween variablesof theoperational environment

    (Xs)and modes&settingsselected bypilotsin thestudy(Ys).

    INTERLOCKS

    REFERENCES

    Alexander,C. ThePhenomenonofLife. Berkeley,CA:TheCenterfor EnvironmentalStructure,2002.

    Alexander,C. TheProcessof CreatingLife. Berkeley,CA:TheCenterfor EnvironmentalStructure,2002.

    Alexander,C. AForeshadowingof21st CenturyArt:The ColorandGeometry ofveryEarly TurkishCarpets.NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress,1993.

    Bateson,G. Stepstoan EcologyofMind. Chicago,Illinois:UniversityofChicagoPress, 1972/1999.

    Degani,A.Modelinghuman-machinesystems:Onmodes,error,and patternsofinteraction. Unpublisheddoctoraldissertation.Atlanta,GA:GeorgiaInstituteofTechnology,1996.

    Degani,A.,Shafto,M.& Olson,L.DataAbstractionand IntegrationofInformationforDisplay: AnalysisofPilot-AutomationInteraction.Proceedingofthe11th InternationalConferenceofHuman-ComputerInteractioninAeronautics,2006,164-167. September20-22,Seattle,WA.

    Degani,A.,Shafto,M.& Olson,L.CanonicalCorrelationAnalysis:Use ofcompositeheliographsforrepresentingmultiplepatterns.ProceedingsoftheFourth InternationalConferenceontheTheory andApplicationofDiagrams. Springer-Verlag:LectureNotesin ComputerScience4045.2006.June 28-30,Stanford,CA.

    Garland,K. Mr.BecksUndergroundMap. HarrowWeald,Middlesex:CapitalTransportPublishing,1994.

    Goldstein,W.Introductionto Brunswikiantheoryandmethods. InA.Kirlik(Ed.)AdaptivePerspectivesonHuman-TechnologyInteraction. NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress,2006.

    Heymann,M.,andDegani,A. Formalanalysisandautomatic generationofuserinterfaces:Approach,methodology,andanalgorithm.HumanFactors 49,2007,311-330.

    Hotelling,H.Themost predictablecriterion.JournalofEducationalPsychology 26,1935,139-142.

    Iverson,D. InductiveSystemHealthMonitoring.Proceedingsofthe2004 InternationalConferenceonArtificialIntelligence(IC-AI04),2004.

    LeboffD.,andDemuth,T. NoNeed toAsk:Early Mapsofthe LondonUndergroundRailways.HarrowWeald,Middlesex:CapitalTransportPublishing,1999

    Lu,P.,andSteinhardt,P. DecagonalandQuasi-CrystallineTilingsinMedievalIslamicArchitecture.Science315,2007,1106-1110.

    OishiM.,Tomlin,C.and Degani,A. Discreteabstractionofhybrid systems:Verificationofsafetyand applicationtouser-interfaces.NASATechnicalMemorandum#212803,2003,MoffettField,CA:NASAAmesResearchCenter.

    Rasmussen,J.InformationProcessingandHuman-MachineInteraction:AnApproachtoCognitiveEngineering.

    NewYork:North-Holland,1986

    Shafto,M.,Degani,A.,andKirlik,A. Canonicalcorrelationanalysisofdata onhuman-automationinteraction.Proceedingsofthe41st AnnualMeetingofthe HumanFactorsandErgonomicsSociety. 1997Albuquerque,NM.

    Shannon,C.E.TheMathematicalTheoryofCommunication. InC.E.Shannonand W.Weaver(Eds.),TheMathematicalTheoryofCommunication. Urbana,Illinois:The UniversityofIllinoisPress,1962/1948.

    Weaver,W.Recent ContributionstotheMathematicalTheoryofCommunication.In C.E.ShannonandW.Weaver(Eds.),TheMathematicalTheoryofCommunication. Urbana,Illinois:The UniversityofIllinoisPress,1962/1949.

    GOOD SHAPELOCAL (RELAXED)

    SYMMETRYCONTRAST

    Abstraction

    Integration

    Organization

    Extraction

    Aco nceptual framework. The pyramid in the figure has four levels: (1) extraction of signals from

    the system and its environment and turning them into data; (2) abstraction of data into corresponding

    information; (3) integration of information into geometrically coherent structures so as to show

    meaningful relationships, supporting knowledge and understanding; and (4) organization of these information

    structures in order to create order and a sense of wholeness.

    SIGNALS

    ORDER & WHOLENESS

    KNOWLEDGE&

    INFORMATION

    DATA

    UNDERSTANDING

    GraphicDesign byCheryse Triano,TopSpinDesign Works