1
Several compounds, including some non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), can promote amyloid- (A) 42 formation in vivo and may therefore put people at greater risk of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Short-term studies in mice have shown that two drugs, fenofibrate and celecoxib, sub- stantially increased A42 formation. Previous studies have identified select NSAIDs capable of lowering production of A42 in vitro and in vivo. However, recent studies by Todd E Golde and co-workers (Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA) have identified several compounds that increase A42 production, including cyclo- oxygenase-2 (COX-2) selective NSAIDs and derivatives of NSAIDs that lower A42 production. By use of cell- based screening, the researchers identified only one compound that downregulated COX activity but also lowered A42 production. Many compounds raised A42, most of which decreased the production of A38 and other shorter A peptides. The results of short-term in vivo studies showed that these compounds significantly increased amounts of A42 in mice. Fenofibrate, an antilipidaemic agent, and celecoxib, a COX-2 selective NSAID, were among the more potent A42-promoting drugs identified by Golde and co-workers (Nat Med 2005; 11: 545–50). The compounds seem to increase A42 production by targeting the -secretase complex. “This effect mimics the effect of mutations in the amyloid- peptide precursor and presenilin genes on A production”, comments Golde. “Since these mutations cause AD, such data potentially suggests that compounds (including ones produced as natural metabolites in the body) could regulate A42 production and possibly alter risk for AD.” The results point to the -secretase complex as the target of both the A42-lowering and A42- promoting agents, but suggest that they affect the complex in distinct ways. According to Golde, these results re-inforce the notion that not all NSAIDs are equal; the secondary effects could be different for different NSAIDs, which may mean that they influence the AD phenotype differently. Golde also stresses that the epi- demiological data support a protective and not necessarily a therapeutic role for traditional NSAIDs in AD. “All we know is that at least two of the compounds we identify can increase A42 in mice following oral dosing.” Paul Aisen (Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA) also advises caution when extrapolating these results to human beings. “Doses used in humans may not yield brain levels associated with significant A42 changes”, he comments. “While further investi- gation is warranted, it would be premature to draw any clinical conclusions from these findings.” Stephanie Bartlett A42 formation: not all NSAIDs are equal Newsdesk A specific MRI technique can accurately predict brain-tumour response after cancer treatment, according to a recent study by Bradford A Moffat and colleagues (University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Non- invasive diffusion MRI, based on the motion of water molecules, can be used to assess the effectiveness of radiotherapy or chemotherapy to treat brain tumours 10 weeks earlier than traditional testing methods. Individuals with primary brain tumours have high mortality rates and short survival periods. Treatment tailored to each patient is therefore essential—these tumours are highly heterogeneous (ie, composed of different cell types) making them difficult to treat. First-line treatment commonly fails and therefore delays effective treatment of the tumour. Diffusion MRI was first used successfully in mice to analyse brain- tumour response. Moffat and co- workers have now used a similar technique in patients after the start of treatment (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102: 5524–29). The technique is dependent on analysing the diffusion of water molecules in tumours, which is determined by the density of tumour cells. Diffusion values can be calculated and displayed in a functional diffusion map for digital image analysis. The researchers investigated whether diffusion MRI could predict tumour response to treatment (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or both). They examined 20 patients with unresectable, primary brain tumours with standard and diffusion MRI before treatment. Patients then underwent another diffusion MRI 3 weeks after treatment, and another standard MRI after treatment had 334 http://neurology.thelancet.com Vol 4 June 2005 Diffusion MRI predicts response of brain tumours to treatment Imaging the results of tumour treatment Will & Deni McIntyre/Science Photo Library Rights were not granted to include this image in electronic media. Please refer to the printed journal.

Aβ42 formation: not all NSAIDs are equal

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Aβ42 formation: not all NSAIDs are equal

Several compounds, including somenon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs(NSAIDs), can promote amyloid-�(A�) 42 formation in vivo and maytherefore put people at greater risk ofAlzheimer’s disease (AD). Short-termstudies in mice have shown that twodrugs, fenofibrate and celecoxib, sub-stantially increased A�42 formation.

Previous studies have identifiedselect NSAIDs capable of loweringproduction of A�42 in vitro and invivo. However, recent studies by ToddE Golde and co-workers (Mayo Clinic,Jacksonville, FL, USA) have identifiedseveral compounds that increaseA�42 production, including cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) selectiveNSAIDs and derivatives of NSAIDs thatlower A�42 production. By use of cell-based screening, the researchersidentified only one compound thatdownregulated COX activity but alsolowered A�42 production. Manycompounds raised A�42, most ofwhich decreased the production ofA�38 and other shorter A� peptides.

The results of short-term in vivostudies showed that these compoundssignificantly increased amounts ofA�42 in mice.

Fenofibrate, an antilipidaemic agent,and celecoxib, a COX-2 selectiveNSAID, were among the more potentA�42-promoting drugs identifiedby Golde and co-workers (Nat Med2005; 11: 545–50). The compoundsseem to increase A�42 production bytargeting the �-secretase complex.“This effect mimics the effect ofmutations in the amyloid-� peptideprecursor and presenilin genes on A�production”, comments Golde. “Sincethese mutations cause AD, such datapotentially suggests that compounds(including ones produced as naturalmetabolites in the body) couldregulate A�42 production andpossibly alter risk for AD.”

The results point to the �-secretasecomplex as the target of boththe A�42-lowering and A�42-promoting agents, but suggest thatthey affect the complex in distinct

ways. According to Golde, theseresults re-inforce the notion that notall NSAIDs are equal; the secondaryeffects could be different for differentNSAIDs, which may mean that theyinfluence the AD phenotypedifferently.

Golde also stresses that the epi-demiological data support a protectiveand not necessarily a therapeutic rolefor traditional NSAIDs in AD. “All weknow is that at least two of thecompounds we identify can increaseA�42 in mice following oral dosing.”

Paul Aisen (Georgetown UniversityMedical Center, Washington, DC,USA) also advises caution whenextrapolating these results to humanbeings. “Doses used in humans maynot yield brain levels associatedwith significant A�42 changes”, hecomments. “While further investi-gation is warranted, it would bepremature to draw any clinicalconclusions from these findings.”

Stephanie Bartlett

A�42 formation: not all NSAIDs are equal

Newsdesk

A specific MRI technique canaccurately predict brain-tumourresponse after cancer treatment,according to a recent study byBradford A Moffat and colleagues(University of Michigan School of

Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Non-invasive diffusion MRI, based on themotion of water molecules, can beused to assess the effectiveness ofradiotherapy or chemotherapy to treatbrain tumours 10 weeks earlier thantraditional testing methods.

Individuals with primary braintumours have high mortality rates andshort survival periods. Treatmenttailored to each patient is thereforeessential—these tumours are highlyheterogeneous (ie, composed ofdifferent cell types) making themdifficult to treat. First-line treatmentcommonly fails and therefore delayseffective treatment of the tumour.

Diffusion MRI was first usedsuccessfully in mice to analyse brain-tumour response. Moffat and co-workers have now used a similar

technique in patients after the start oftreatment (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2005; 102: 5524–29). The techniqueis dependent on analysing thediffusion of water molecules intumours, which is determined by thedensity of tumour cells. Diffusionvalues can be calculated and displayedin a functional diffusion map fordigital image analysis.

The researchers investigatedwhether diffusion MRI could predicttumour response to treatment(chemotherapy, radiotherapy, orboth). They examined 20 patientswith unresectable, primary braintumours with standard and diffusionMRI before treatment. Patients thenunderwent another diffusion MRI3 weeks after treatment, and anotherstandard MRI after treatment had

334 http://neurology.thelancet.com Vol 4 June 2005

Diffusion MRI predicts response of brain tumours to treatment

Imaging the results of tumour treatment

Will

&D

eniM

cInt

yre/

Scie

nce

Phot

oLi

brar

y

Rights were not granted to includethis image in electronic media. Please

refer to the printed journal.