View
218
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
A2 EconomicsPowerPoint Briefings 2009PowerPoint Briefings 2009
European Union Enlargement
tutor2ututor2u™™
tutor2u™
The Official EU View on Enlargement
• “Enlargement is one of the EU's most powerful policy tools. It serves the EU's strategic interests in stability, security, and conflict prevention. It has helped to increase prosperity and growth opportunities, to improve links with vital transport and energy routes, and to increase the EU's weight in the world.
• In May 2009, the EU will mark the fifth anniversary of the 2004 enlargement.”
tutor2u™
Some issues to cover and revise
• Has the widening of the EU been a success?
• The benefits and costs of enlargement for
– New member states
– Existing (established) members of the EU
– The EU economy as a whole e.g. in the context of globalisation and other external events
• EU enlargement and immigration policy
• How many more countries will join?
• Will enlargement prevent final economic union?
• How many new states will join the Euro?
• Is enlargement fatigue setting in?
• What of states that remain outside of the EU e.g. Norway and Iceland
tutor2u™
EU Enlargement – A Brief Historical Perspective
• Europe has added new members periodically
• Six Main Waves of EU Enlargement
– 1973 (UK, Ireland and Denmark)
– 1981 (Greece)
– 1986 (Portugal and Spain)
– 1995 (Austria, Finland and Sweden)
– 2004 (Ten new countries)
– 2007 (Bulgaria and Romania)
tutor2u™
Who will be next? Potential members
tutor2u™
Centre for European Reform
• “The objective of joining the EU has helped the Central and East European countries to move from post-Communist upheaval to market economics and pluralist democracies in little more than a decade. Ten countries successfully joined the EU in May 2004, and Bulgaria and Romania followed in January 2007. However, the Union is showing signs of 'enlargement fatigue'. Many politicians worry that an ever larger Union will function badly, and that further widening will come at the expense of deepening. West European workers fear the economic consequences of adding 50 million low-cost workers to the EU single market. Future accession would be very difficult unless public and political support for enlargement revives.”
• www.cer.org.uk/enlargement_new/index_enlargement_new.html
tutor2u™
EU Membership Distribution in Jan 2004
EU MEMBERSHIP (April 2004)
RICH POOR
LARGE UK SPAIN
FRANCE
ITALY
GERMANY
SMALL BELGIUM PORTUGAL
LUXEMBOURG GREECE
NETHERLANDS
IRELAND
DENMARK
SWEDEN
AUSTRIA
FINLAND
tutor2u™
EU Membership in January 2009
EU MEMBERSHIP JANUARY 2009
RICH POOR
LARGE UK SPAIN
FRANCE POLAND
ITALY
GERMANY
SMALL BELGIUM PORTUGAL
LUXEMBOURG GREECE
NETHERLANDS ESTONIA ROMANIA
IRELAND HUNGARY BULGARIA
DENMARK CZECH REPUBLIC
SWEDEN SLOVAKIA
AUSTRIA SLOVENIA
FINLAND CYPRUS
MALTA
LITHUANIA
LATVIA
tutor2u™
The Map of an Enlarged Europe
tutor2u™
Overview of new member states (1)
Per Capita IncomesEU25=100
PPP adjusted
Manufacturing as a % of GDP GDP Growth
1997 2008 % in 2006 Average annual growth (%)
1999-08
Bulgaria 26 39 26 5.3
Cyprus 86 92 11 3.8
Czech Republic 73 82 32 2.8
Estonia 42 67 21 6.4
Hungary 52 63 26 3.8
Latvia 37 56 15 7.3
Lithuania 38 62 23 6.5
Malta 81 76 17 1.9
Poland 47 55 25 4.2
Romania 26 44 27 5.2
Slovakia 51 71 28 4.5
Slovenia 78 91 28 5.2
Turkey 32 42 25 4.2
United Kingdom
tutor2u™
Overview of new member states (2)
Inflation Unemployment Labour productivity Population
% change in consumer prices in 2008
Per cent of the labour force in November 2008
GDP per person employed
EU27=100 in 2008
Thousands – 2008 mid year estimate
Bulgaria 12.0 5.1 36 7 640
Cyprus 4.4 3.9 85 789
Czech Republic 6.3 4.5 73 10 381
Estonia 10.6 8.3 63 1 340
Hungary 6.0 8.3 74 10 045
Latvia 15.3 9.0 51 2 270
Lithuania 11.1 7.0 63 3 366
Malta 4.7 5.8 89 410
Poland 4.2 6.5 62 38 115
Romania 7.9 5.8 45 21 528
Slovakia 3.9 9.1 78 5 401
Slovenia 5.5 4.3 86 2 025
Turkey 10.4 n/a 62 70 586
United Kingdom
tutor2u™
GDP Per Head for selected member states
Index of GDP per head, purchasing power standard, EU25=100, source: Euro
Income convergence for new EU members
Czech Republic Hungary Poland Slovenia
Estonia Slovak Republic Bulgaria Lithuania
Latvia Romania
Source: Reuters EcoWin
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
EU
27
=1
00
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100 Some progress in raising relative living standards
Catching up with Portugal and Greece
Newer nations are considerably poorer
tutor2u™
Unemployment rates for selected countries
Percentage of the labour force, annual average, source: Eurostat
Unemployment in selected New Member States
Source: Reuters EcoWin
98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
20.0
Pe
rce
nt
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
20.0
Lithuania
Slovenia
Estonia
Czech Republic
EU25 average
Hungary
Poland
Slovakia
Strong growth has helped to bring down unemployment
More jobs for domestic workers – reverse migration?
But putting pressure on wages to rise
tutor2u™
Joining the Club – Criterion for EU Entry
• Accession countries have to meet the Copenhagen criterion for joining the European Union
– Stability of political institutions guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law, human rights and respect for and protection of minorities
– A fully functioning market economy that meets the standards required for participation in the single market
tutor2u™
Transition Economies
• Price Liberalisation
– Moving away from state controlled prices to allow the price mechanism greater influence in allocating resources
• Privatisation
– Transfer of ownership
– Development of private sector capital markets
tutor2u™
Transition Economies (2)
• Liberalisation of Trade with other Countries
– Full convertibility of currencies
– Preparation for eventual membership of the Euro
• Reforms of the Financial Sector
– Fully-functioning Central Banks to take control of monetary policy
– Capital markets for corporate and government bond issues
tutor2u™
Potential Gains for Accession Countries
• (1) Membership of the EU Single Market
– Trade:
• Exploiting comparative advantage to increase trade
– Investment
• Free movement of capital – looking for the highest return
• Inward investment to aid transformation of national infrastructure – impact on a country’s LRAS / trend growth
– Competition
• More competition – a boost to labour productivity
• Dynamic efficiency gains e.g. arising from higher capital investment and faster pace of innovation
tutor2u™
Potential Gains for Accession Countries (2)
• Financial Support
– Countries will be net recipients of income from
• Common Agricultural Policy
• EU Structural funds
• Many regions have per capita incomes well below the 75% threshold for Objective 1 funding
• 92% of population of accession countries lives in regions with a GDP/head under 75% of the EU25 average. 61% of the population lives in regions below 50%
• Much of the EU funding will help to finance investment
tutor2u™
Potential Gains for Accession Countries (3)
• Potential macroeconomic advantages
– Reduced exchange rate volatility – many countries are keen to join the Euro to reduce exchange rate risk and benefit from lower interest rates
– Slovenia, Slovakia, Cyprus and Malta have joined the single currency
• Slovenia – January 2007
• Cyprus and Malta – January 2008
• Slovakia – January 2009
– Other countries do not meet the entry requirements or have chosen to remain outside – to retain monetary policy flexibility
tutor2u™
Competitive advantage for new states?
• Central European location for many
• Significantly lower wage costs
• Lower productivity – but unit labour costs still cheaper e.g. for car manufacturers
• Lower land prices
• Attractive corporate tax regime + other incentives
• Success of previous inward investments
• Many new states have highly literate population
tutor2u™
Diagram corner
• Useful diagrams for this topic:
• Trade diagrams – welfare effects from single market, exploitation of comparative advantage
• AD-AS diagrams
– Inward investment effects
– Economic shocks within the enlarged EU economy
• Economies of scale
• Labour market diagrams e.g. impact of migration
A2 EconomicsPowerPoint Briefings 2009PowerPoint Briefings 2009
Competitiveness and Growth in the New Member States
Performance of Europe’s new countries
tutor2u™
Competitiveness
Institute for World Economics of the Hungarian Academy of SciencesComparative Survey of the new Member States
Ranking Country Index value
1. Slovenia 90.6
2. Czech Republic 82.8
3. Lithuania 81.5
4. Hungary 80.5
5. Estonia 80.2
6. Slovakia 74.2
7. Poland 71.9
8. Latvia 71.5
Economic criteria include: real GDP growth, GDP (PPP) per capita, gross investment, productivity, balance of trade, unemployment, and convergence indices of the economic and monetary union
tutor2u™
The Sources of Growth
Productivity
Capital Stock
InventionInnovation
Technology
Labour Inputs
NaturalResources
EconomicGrowth
tutor2u™
The Sources of Growth
Productivity
Capital Stock
InventionInnovation
Technology
Labour Inputs
NaturalResources
EconomicGrowth
Labour Supply
Labour Utilisation
Human Capital
tutor2u™
The Sources of Growth
Productivity
Capital Stock
InventionInnovation
Technology
Labour Inputs
NaturalResources
EconomicGrowth
Labour productivity
Total factor productivity
Labour Supply
Labour Utilisation
Human Capital
tutor2u™
The Sources of Growth
Productivity
Capital Stock
InventionInnovation
Technology
Labour Inputs
NaturalResources
EconomicGrowth
Fixed Capital
Infrastructure
Social Capital
Labour productivity
Total factor productivity
Labour Supply
Labour Utilisation
Human Capital
tutor2u™
Recent growth for selected countries
Annual % change in Real Gross Domestic Product for selected countries
Faster growth for many new member states
Estonia [ar 4 quarters] Lithuania [ar 4 quarters] Latvia [ar 4 quarters]
Hungary [ar 4 quarters] United Kingdom [ar 4 quarters]
Source: Reuters EcoWin
96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08
-5.0
-2.5
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5
15.0
Pe
rce
nt
-5.0
-2.5
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5
15.0
Hungary
Lithuania
Estonia
Latvia
UK
Growth much faster than the UK
But has this been sustainable?
Steep slowdown and now recession for many new EU members
Some of them “over-heated” when they joined the EU
tutor2u™
Latvia – Rampant wage inflation destabilised the economy
Annual % change in money wages and current account balance
Latvia's Booming Economy - Out of Control?
Wages, Average Monthly, Gross [ar 12 months] Current Account, Balance, TotalSource: Reuters EcoWin
03 04 05 06 07 08
LV
L (
mill
ion
s)
-400
-350
-300
-250
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
Current Account Balance
Pe
rce
nt
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Wage Inflation
Click here for an article
tutor2u™
Estonia – from boom to deep recession
Annual percentage change in real national income, unemployment rate %
Estonia's GDP Growth and Unemployment
Source: Reuters EcoWin
Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q101 02 03 04 05 06 07 08
-5.0
-2.5
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5
15.0
Pe
rce
nt
-5.0
-2.5
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5
15.0
Estonia
Economic Growth
Unemployment
tutor2u™
Inflation - better control in some new EU countries than others
Annual % change in consumer prices (all items)
Inflation Rates for Selected new EU States
Hungary Czech Republic Poland LatviaSource: Reuters EcoWin
96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Pe
rce
nt
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
tutor2u™
Poland has improved the trade off between jobs and prices
Poland - Unemployment and Inflation
Unemployment, Rate Consumer Prices, By Commodity, Index, 1998=100 [ar 12 months]
Source: Reuters EcoWin
02 03 04 05 06 07 08
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5
15.0
17.5
20.0
22.5
Pe
rce
nt
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5
15.0
17.5
20.0
22.5
Unemployment rate (per cent)
Consumer price inflation (%)
tutor2u™
And a rising employment rate will help to provide jobs at home for younger workers
Per cent of population of working age in a job
Employment Rate for Poland
I.1.1: Total employment rate I.1.2: Employment rate, females
I.1.3: Employment rate, males
Source: Reuters EcoWin
97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07
45.0
47.5
50.0
52.5
55.0
57.5
60.0
62.5
65.0
67.5
Pe
rce
nt
45.0
47.5
50.0
52.5
55.0
57.5
60.0
62.5
65.0
67.5
tutor2u™
Potential Gains for Existing EU Countries
• (1) Export potential and exploitation of economies of scale
• (2) Foreign Investment and Incomes and Profits
• (3) More diverse European labour market
• (4) A cleaner environment
• (5) Catalyst for further structural reforms in the EU
– Reforms to the CAP
– Spur to countries to reform their labour markets in the face of lower labour cost competition
– Many countries are already engaging in tax competition
tutor2u™
EU Enlargement – an export opportunity for the UK
Exports of goods and services, annual data, current prices, £ billion
UK Exports to a selection of new EU Member Stat
Source: Reuters EcoWin
93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07
bill
ion
s
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
GB
P (
bill
ion
s)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
Czech Republic
Slovakia
Poland
Hungary
tutor2u™
Main Concerns of Member Nations
• Extra budgetary costs for the EU
• Can accession countries continue to meet stricter EU environmental standards?
• Long-term need for higher regional subsidies – loss of some regional funding for established EU countries
• Social concerns from increased labour migration
• Some Objective 1 regions will now lose some of their funding – including regions in the UK, Spain, Greece and Portugal
tutor2u™
Economic Concerns of Member Nations
• Labour Market Issues
– Fears of higher structural unemployment among accession countries – which might lead to large immigration of labour into higher-income countries + political and social tensions
– Fears of a surge in economic migration from East to West
• Social dumping?
• Concerns about organised crime and illegal immigration from Russia, Belarus and the Ukraine through weak Eastern European borders
• In Germany, Austria and Italy (countries that border accession states) there are intensive debates about controlling the flow of migrants from former Eastern Europe
tutor2u™
What is convergence?
• Income convergence:
• Where the divide in per capita incomes becomes smaller over time
• Requires countries to achieve relatively faster growth over a substantial time period
• Convergence may also happen if other “richer” countries suffer a slowdown
• NMS trade heavily with the established EU – so an EU-wide slowdown is not in their long term interests
tutor2u™
The likely scenario for new member states
• Income convergence is not automatic
• Baltic states and Slovenia appear to have the best growth / convergence potential but Baltic States over-heated
• Convergence will happen but at different speeds
• Is there a new Ireland? A Baltic Tiger? Ireland collapse in 08
• Growth is stimulated by capital investment and productivity
• But in the long term, NMS will need to improve employment rates, and achieve great labour mobility
• Unemployment is a constraint on growth
• Demographics will also play a role
• Will the new members join the Euro? 4 have done so
tutor2u™
Recent articles on EU enlargement
• Financial crisis in Hungary
• http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/oct/29/creditcrunch-eu
• Reversing Poles: how Poland brought its workers home
• http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/jan/23/poland-reverses-uk-migration
• Will Turkey ever be accepted by the EU?
• http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/jan/19/turkey-gaza
• Crises test stability of new EU states
• http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/5f05bd08-e331-11dd-a5cf-0000779fd2ac.html
• Balkan states set to launch EU bids
• http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7f38328c-a776-11dd-865e-000077b07658.html
• Crunch time for eastern Europe
• http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/95f2113e-cb14-11dd-87d7-000077b07658.html
• Turkey tries to revive EU drive
• http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7837145.stm
tutor2u™
Key Unit 4 Tips
• Use the bullet points (reworded) as subheadings
• Ensure you answer all sections
• Answer the question!
• Refer to extracts and articles to support your answer (analysis)
• Use terminology/definitions from the AS/A2 course, theory and diagrams (application)
• Evaluation is crucial (30 marks!) but does not have to take place only in the final section: say which sources are more useful than others, say what other data would have helped you to make a better recommendation, say which sources may be biased. Evaluation is saying what your recommendation is based on!
• Plan your answer to ensure you cover as much relevant material as possible
• Aim to write at least 7 – 8 sides in the time provided (including diagrams – easy application marks)
• Remember that 120/120 is not out of the question – and this is not always the ‘best’ candidates who achieve this
• Source: Andy Threadgould, Dulwich College, Jan 2009