11
A Response to the OECD Report on Improving School Leadership Dr. Tim London: [email protected]

A Response to the OECD Report on Improving School Leadership Dr. Tim London: [email protected]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: A Response to the OECD Report on Improving School Leadership Dr. Tim London: T.London@qub.ac.uk

A Response to the OECD Report on Improving School

Leadership

Dr. Tim London: [email protected]

Page 2: A Response to the OECD Report on Improving School Leadership Dr. Tim London: T.London@qub.ac.uk

Integrated schools The general state of cross- community

relationships Relative stability of policy environment Declining enrolments (total numbers)

leading to more competition Increasing diversity of families and

students being served The tremendous amount of adjustments

in resource allocation necessary (Odden & Archibald, 2001)

Dr. Tim London: [email protected]

Page 3: A Response to the OECD Report on Improving School Leadership Dr. Tim London: T.London@qub.ac.uk

1. What are distributed and collaborative leadership?

2. Teacher training3. Selection of teachers and leaders4. Gaps between training organizations5. That we might be kidding ourselves by not

giving enough weight to culture and social norms in education

6. A special bonus worry to be shared later

Dr. Tim London: [email protected]

Page 4: A Response to the OECD Report on Improving School Leadership Dr. Tim London: T.London@qub.ac.uk

Multiple definitions of both concepts (Firestone et. al, 1996; Ogawa et. al; Leithwood & Jantzi, 2000; Spillane, Halverson, & Diamond, 2000, 2001)• These are not necessarily related concepts• They require different skills and structures

Members of schools must understand and be able to use more than one model

When, where, who, how, how much Enormous challenge in building sufficient

facility to monitor and adapt to local needs

Dr. Tim London: [email protected]

Page 5: A Response to the OECD Report on Improving School Leadership Dr. Tim London: T.London@qub.ac.uk

Building leadership training into teacher preparation programs (Smylie et. al., 2002; Follett, 1926)• General leadership concepts• Collaborative models (intra- and inter-school collaboration)• Distributed models

Training in data analysis, research methods, and use of research

Making it clear that there is a marked change in conceptions about what schools can and should do

How do we fit all of these extra components into existing training structures?• Do we replace courses or expand programs?

Dr. Tim London: [email protected]

Page 6: A Response to the OECD Report on Improving School Leadership Dr. Tim London: T.London@qub.ac.uk

Chances for supervised practical experience Teachers-in-training have time in schools

• Do we need to change the way these are supervised?• Do we need to change the structure to provide more

time or access to differing areas• Time in schools should not just be based on pedagogy,

but also leadership activities (Smylie et. al., 2002) Increased support mechanisms attached to

assuming new roles (leaders and teachers) We know a great deal about how to help

adults learn• Zenger, Ulrich, & Smallwood, 2000; London & Smither,

1999; Bransford, Brown & Cocking, 2000; Broad & Newstrom, 1992

Dr. Tim London: [email protected]

Page 7: A Response to the OECD Report on Improving School Leadership Dr. Tim London: T.London@qub.ac.uk

Baseline eligibility criteria is the same for teachers and leaders! Teaching is different than leading (Hill, 2007)

Who selects and how are they trained? Effective selection depends on attracting

candidates with ideal characteristics for that particular school/situation• Then, who is the best of the best? Based on...?

Perception of hiring process is just as important as actual process

Dr. Tim London: [email protected]

Page 8: A Response to the OECD Report on Improving School Leadership Dr. Tim London: T.London@qub.ac.uk

Currently, the structures are very complex• Efficiency?• Redundancy?• Gaps in training?

Are there ways to bring RTU, Universities, ESA, Boards of Governors, school leaders, etc. together?• Improvement of supervision, tapping into multiple

areas of expertise, training tailored to specific contexts, improved efficiency and effectiveness

Dr. Tim London: [email protected]

Page 9: A Response to the OECD Report on Improving School Leadership Dr. Tim London: T.London@qub.ac.uk

Assessing formal structures and measuring summative outcomes is not a full picture of the reality in schools

Larger data sets reduce the delicacy and sensitivity of results

Changing large-scale policy does not automatically uproot and change practice

Dr. Tim London: [email protected]

Page 10: A Response to the OECD Report on Improving School Leadership Dr. Tim London: T.London@qub.ac.uk

Organizational learning and social/cultural norms: • Leithwood, Leonard, & Sharratt (1998); Trice &

Beyer (1993); Cook & Yannow (1993); Blau & Scott (1962); Schein (1985); Murphy et. al.; Martin (2002); Marks & Louis (1999); Scribner, Hager, & Warne (2002)

Analysis of how organizations function:• Selznick (1948); Etzioni (1965); Hersey,

Blanchard, & Natemeyer (1979); Randall, Copper, Speakman, & Rosenfield (1998)

Dr. Tim London: [email protected]

Page 11: A Response to the OECD Report on Improving School Leadership Dr. Tim London: T.London@qub.ac.uk

My real fear is that• we will talk ourselves into complacency;

• we will equate talk and research with change;

• we will remain academics or practitioners; and

• we will all be back here next year, or the year after, talking about these same issues for the same reasons.

Dr. Tim London: [email protected]