Upload
others
View
11
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
AIMA Journal of Management & Research, October 2015, Volume 9 Issue 3/4, ISSN 0974 – 497 Copy
right© 2015 AJMR-AIMA Page 1
Article No.4
APPAREL PURCHASE DECISION AND BUYING
BEHAVIOUR OF COLLEGE STUDENTS
Dr. M. Krishnakumar Associate Professor, Department of Fashion Management Studies, National
Institute of Fashion Technology, Kannur
Abstract: India being the second largest populated country in the world has huge youth population. It
is estimated that India would have the highest number of youth population in the coming years comparing
to any other country in the world. The organised retail industry in India is growing at a rapid pace and
subsequently the apparel industry which occupies the top place in the organised retailing also growing
rapidly. Many retail organisations both foreign and domestic are entering in this filed. The purchase power
of these youth plays an important role in the Indian economy. The purchase behaviour towards apparel
among Indian youths is getting changed considerably. The paper studies purchase behaviour towards
apparel of college students, which includes apparel purchase decision, apparel purchase and opinion
towards the marketing mix factors (i.e. Product, Price, Place and Promotion).
Key words: apparel, consumer behaviour, youth, college students, purchase decision, purchase, marketing
mix
Introduction
India being the second largest populated country in the world has huge youth population.
It is estimated that India would have the highest number of youth population in the
coming years comparing to any other country in the world. Indian Textile and apparel
Industry is one of the leading industries in India. The opening up of economy gave the
much-needed thrust to the Indian textile and apparel industry, which has now
successfully become one of the largest in the world. India's textile and apparel industry
(domestic and exports) is expected to grow from Rs 3.27 lakh crores to Rs 10.32 lakh
crore by 2020, says a new research report by Technopak Advisors, a leading management
consultancy. Though it was predominantly unorganized industry even a few years back,
but the scenario started changing after the economic liberalization of Indian economy in
1991. The organised retail industry in India is growing at a rapid pace and subsequently
the apparel industry which occupies the top place in the organised retailing also growing
rapidly. Many retail organisations both foreign and domestic are entering in this filed.
The purchase power of these youth plays an important role in the Indian economy.
Consumer behaviour in the purchase of apparel products may have great influence on the
outcomes obtained by the consumer The purchase behaviour towards apparel among
Indian youths is getting changed considerably. The paper studies purchase behaviour
towards apparel of college students, which includes apparel purchase decision, apparel
purchase and opinion towards the marketing mix factors (i.e. Product, Price, Place and
Promotion).
AIMA Journal of Management & Research, October 2015, Volume 9 Issue 3/4, ISSN 0974 – 497 Copy
right© 2015 AJMR-AIMA Page 2
Objectives
The objectives of this study are
1. To study apparel purchase decision process of college students.
2. To study apparel buying behaviour of college students.
3. To study the importance of marketing mix factors of apparel among college
students.
Literature Review
Indian Apparel Industry
India‟s retail industry accounts for 10 percentage of its GDP and 8 percentage of the
employment to reach $17 billion by 2010. The Indian retail market is estimated at US$
350 billion. But organised retail is estimated at only US$ 8 billion. However, the
opportunity is huge-by 2010, organised retail is expected to grow at 6 percentage by 2010
and touch a retail business of $ 17 billion as against its current growth level of 3 per cent
which at present is estimated to be $ 6 billion, according to the Study undertaken by The
Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India (ASSOCHAM). India is
currently the ninth largest retail market in the world. Organised retail in India has the
potential to add over Rs.2,000 billion (US$45 billion) business by the Year 2010
generating employment for some 2.5 million people in various retail operations and over
10 million additional workforces in retail support activities including contract production
& processing, supply chain & logistics, retail real estate development & management etc.
It is estimated that it will cross the $650-billion mark by 2011, with an already estimated
investment of around $421 billion slated for the next four years (Mulky and Nargundkar,
2003).
The ready-mades and western outfits are growing at 40-45 per cent annually, as the
market teems up with international brands and new entrants entering this segment
creating an Rs.5 billion market for the premium grooming segment. The past few years
has seen the sector aligning itself with global trends with retailing companies like
Shoppers‟ stop and Crossroads entering the fray to entice the middle class. However, it is
estimated that this segment would grow to Rs. 3 billion in the next three years. The
Indian retail sector is poised for big times is a well-known fact, now a new study has
confirmed this one more time. According to a survey conducted by business consultancy
Technopak Advisors, the country‟s retail market is expected to touch 620 billion euros
(around Rs 37 lakh crores) by 2020 at a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of
more than 25 per cent. Strong underlying economic growth, population expansion, the
increasing wealth of individuals and the rapid construction of organized
retail infrastructure are key factors behind the forecast. (The Indian Textile Journal, 2007;
Business World, 2007)
The past few years, numerous top international retailers have marked their presence in the
Indian market. For example, Trent, the retail arm of Tata Group, sells high-end clothing
brands like Zara and Sisley. They also run a 50:50 JV with UK‟s biggest retailer Tesco,
which operates cash-and-carry stores in Mumbai, Delhi and Bangalore, and supplies
AIMA Journal of Management & Research, October 2015, Volume 9 Issue 3/4, ISSN 0974 – 497 Copy
right© 2015 AJMR-AIMA Page 3
merchandise to Trent‟s hypermarket chain Star Bazaar. Wal-Mart operates a cash-and-
carry JV with Bharti Enterprises, while Italian luxury fashion brand Dolce & Gabbana
operates a 51:49 single brand retailing venture with real estate major DLF. Similarly,
Marks and Spencer the UK retail chain ventured into India with a partnership with
Reliance Retail. And looking at the growth forecasted by the latest Technopak study,
many more such partnerships are expected to push the segment further.
(Images Business of Fashion, 2008)
Consumer Behaviour
Consumer behaviour which was earlier termed as „overt behaviour‟ is a continuous
consumption process related to pre-purchase, purchase and post purchase issues. This
refers to the physical action of consumers that can be directly observed and measured by
others. According to Michael Solomon & Nancy, (2004), consumer behaviour is the
study of the processes involved when individuals or groups, select, purchase, use or
dispose of products, services, ideas or experiences to satisfy needs and desires. According
to Frank R.Kardes (2002), consumer behaviour is the study of human or consumer
responses to products, services, and the marketing of products and services.
Consumer Behaviour in the Youth Market
Teenagers must face two major conflicts during this period of life: on one hand, they
have to balance between dependency and independency from their parents; while on the
other hand it is also hard to choose whether to conform to their peer group or develop a
unique personality. In order to be popular among adolescents, brands must represent such
specific characteristics that are easy to identify with in this ambivalent age (open,
friendly, rebellious) and values that are desired by teenagers (power, dynamism,
independency, intelligence). Nevertheless, an arrogant, ostentatious or bossy image
alienates the target group. A brand is welcome by girls, if it strengthens attractive
physical appearance and among boys, if it gives a hand to win in their rivalry with. Oral
advertisement fulfils an important role beside mass communication, thus strategies
providing wide area for teenagers to talk about a brand – either by connecting it to a
famous star, using a conspicuous logo or launching a humorous promotion – are
successful. In this age group „aspiration‟ brands mostly include fashion, cell phones and
entertaining electronics, while „possessed‟ brands usually concern fast food restaurants,
soft drinks or sweets.
(Assael,2005; International Consumer Life styles Database 2005; Deeter-Schmelz et al,
2000)
Characteristics of the Indian Consumer Behaviour
The Indian consumers are noted for the high degree of value orientation. Such orientation
to value has labelled. Indians are one of the most discerning consumers in the world.
Even, luxury brands have to design a unique pricing strategy in order to get a foothold in
the Indian market. Indian consumers have a high degree of family orientation. This
orientation in fact, extends to the extended family and friends as well. Brands with
AIMA Journal of Management & Research, October 2015, Volume 9 Issue 3/4, ISSN 0974 – 497 Copy
right© 2015 AJMR-AIMA Page 4
identities that support family values tend to be popular and accepted easily in the Indian
market. Indian consumers are also associated with values of nurturing, care and affection.
These values are far more dominant that values of ambition and achievement. Product
which communicate feelings and emotions gel with the Indian consumers. Apart from
psychology and economics, the role of history and tradition in shaping the Indian
consumer behaviour is quite unique. Perhaps, only in India, one sees traditional products
alongside modern products. For example, hair oils and tooth powder existing with
shampoos and toothpaste. Over the years, as a result of the increasing literacy in the
country, exposure to the west, satellite television, foreign magazines and newspapers,
there is a significant increase of consumer awareness among the Indians. Today more and
more consumers are selective on the quality of the products/services. This awareness has
made the Indian consumers seek more and more reliable sources for purchases such as
organized retail chains that have a corporate background and where the accountability is
more pronounced. The consumer also seeks to purchase from a place where his/her
feedback is more valued. Indian consumers are now more aware and discerning, and are
knowledgeable about technology, products and the market and are beginning to demand
benefits beyond just availability of a range of products that came from „trusted‟
manufacturers. The Indian consumers are price sensitive and prefer to buy value for
money products (Paromita, 2007; Jayashree & Sakthivel 2006;).
Research Methodology
Sampling technique adopted was non-probability, convenience sampling technique.
Tirupur is one of the municipal corporation cities in Tamil Nadu, very well known for its
knitwear apparel export industry. Sample respondents are college from various colleges
in Tirupur. Sample size is 100 and the data was collected through a structured
questionnaire.
Limitations of the Study
The opinions were collected from 100 selected students only. Data was not collected
from the consumer for other region. The technical aspects were ignored for this study.
Only Tirupur college students were selected for the study. Apparel purchase behaviour is
alone considered for this study.
Data Analysis and Interpretation
Demographics
Table 1. Demographic Statistics
Gender Frequency Percentage
Male 41 41.0
Female 59 59.0
Total 100 100.0
Education
AIMA Journal of Management & Research, October 2015, Volume 9 Issue 3/4, ISSN 0974 – 497 Copy
right© 2015 AJMR-AIMA Page 5
Diploma 22 22.0
UG 19 19.0
PG 17 17.0
Others 42 42.0
Total 100 100.0
Type Of College
Polytechnic 22 22.0
Arts & Science 30 30.0
Engineering 4 4.0
Others 44 44.0
Total 100 100.0
It is observed from the above table, in gender, 59% were female and 41% were male. In
education, 42% of the respondents have other qualification, 22% have Diploma, 19%
have UG degree, and 17% have PG degree. In type of college, 44% of the college
students were from other type colleges, 30% were from Arts & Science, 22% from
Polytechnic and 4% of the students from engineering colleges.
Consumer Apparel Purchase Decision Process
From the table 2 it is observed that for reason for buying new apparel, 39% of the
respondents reported that the reason for buying apparel was occasions and 29% reported
more money, 18% reported replacing old one and 14% reported was discount offer. For
influencers of apparel purchase decision, 50% of the respondents reported that friends
were the influencers of apparel purchase decision, 21% were parents, 15% were
brothers/sisters and 14% were sales persons. For accompanying persons during apparel
purchase, 42% of the respondents reported that friends, 34% reported brothers and sisters
and 24% reported parents accompany during apparel purchase. For getting information
about the apparel, 36% of the respondents reported they got information about the apparel
from leaflet and brochure, 21% from bill board, 18% from newspaper, 10% from
magazine and 2% from radio.
Table 2. Consumer Apparel Purchase Decision Process
Statements Particulars Frequency Percentage
Reason for Buying
New Apparel
Occasion 39 39.0
Discount offer 14 14.0
More money 29 29.0
Replacing old one 18 18.0
Total 100 100.0
Influencers of Parents 21 21.0
AIMA Journal of Management & Research, October 2015, Volume 9 Issue 3/4, ISSN 0974 – 497 Copy
right© 2015 AJMR-AIMA Page 6
Statements Particulars Frequency Percentage
Reason for Buying
New Apparel
Occasion 39 39.0
Discount offer 14 14.0
More money 29 29.0
Replacing old one 18 18.0
Apparel Purchase
Decision
Friends 50 50.0
Sales person/Sellers 14 14.0
Brothers/Sisters 15 15.0
Total 100 100.0
Accompanying
Persons during
Apparel Purchase
Parents 24 24.0
Friends 42 42.0
Brother/sister 34 34.0
Total 100 100.0
Getting
Information about
the Apparel
Bill board 21 21.0
Leaflet /Broacher 36 36.0
Newspaper 18 18.0
Magazines 10 10.0
Radio 2 2.0
Television 13 13.0
Total 100 100.0
Search Information
before Apparel
Purchase
Yes 51 51.0
No 49 49.0
Total 100 100.0
Seeking
Consultation on
apparel information
Friends 27 27.0
Old users 40 40.0
Sales person 22 22.0
Parents 11 11.0
Total 100 100.0
Comparison of
Quality and Price
with Other Shops
Yes 92 92.0
No 8 8.0
Total 100 100.0
For search information before apparel purchase, 51% of the respondents reported they
searched information before shopping and 49% said always did not search the
information. For seeking consultation on apparel information, 40% of the respondents
reported they consult with old users, 27% consult with friends, 22% consult with sales
AIMA Journal of Management & Research, October 2015, Volume 9 Issue 3/4, ISSN 0974 – 497 Copy
right© 2015 AJMR-AIMA Page 7
person and 11% consult with parents on apparel information. For comparison of quality
and price with other shops, 92% of the respondents compare the quality and price and
only 8% did not compare the price and quality of other shops before purchase.
Consumer Behaviour On Apparel Buying
Table 3. Consumer Behaviour On Apparel Buying
Statements Particulars Frequency Percentage
Pairs of Apparel
Bought Each Time
Two 69 69.0
Three 30 30.0
More than three 1 1.0
Total 100 100.0
Pairs of Apparel
Bought Last Year
Up to 3 16 16.0
4 to 6 52 52.0
7 to 9 32 32.0
Total 100 100.0
Willingness To Pay
for a Pair of
Apparel
Below 1000 0 0.0
1001- 2000 34 34.0
2001 -3000 66 66.0
Above 3000 0 0.0
Total 100 100.0
Where Bought
Apparel Previously
Departmental stores 13 13.0
Retail shop 86 86.0
Online 1 1.0
Total 100 100.0
Frequency of
Apparel Purchase
Every month 19 19.0
Every three month 59 59.0
Every six month 22 22.0
Total 100 100.0
Brand Preference
while Buying
Same old brand
style 20 20.0
AIMA Journal of Management & Research, October 2015, Volume 9 Issue 3/4, ISSN 0974 – 497 Copy
right© 2015 AJMR-AIMA Page 8
Statements Particulars Frequency Percentage
Pairs of Apparel
Bought Each Time
Two 69 69.0
Three 30 30.0
More than three 1 1.0
Apparel
New brand same old
style 37 37.0
Same old brand new
style 43 43.0
Total 100 100.0
It is observed from the table 3 that for pairs of apparel bought each time 69% of the
respondents buy two, 30% of the respondents buy three pairs and 1% buys more than
three pairs of apparel each time. For pairs of apparel bought last year, 52% of the
respondents bought 4 to 6 pairs, 32 bought 7 to 9 pairs and 16% bought up to 3 pairs of
new apparel during last year. For willingness to pay for a pair of apparel, 66%
respondents willing to pay Rs. 2001-3000, 34% respondents willing to pay Rs1001-2000
and 0% willing to pay below Rs.1000 & above Rs.3000. For where bought apparel
previously, 86% of the respondents bought apparel from retail shop, 13% respondents
bought apparel from departmental store and 1% respondents buying from online. For
frequency of apparel purchase, 59% of the respondents buy apparel every three month,
22% of the respondents buy apparel every six month and 19% respondents buy apparel
every month. For brand preference while buying apparel, 43% of the respondents
preferred same old brand & new style, 37% of the respondents preferred new brand &
same old style and 20% respondents preferred same old brand and old style.
Importance Of Marketing Mix Factors
From the table 4 it is observed that for Product Factors, 53% of the respondents have
preferred medium importance, 25% have preferred high importance, 12% have preferred
most importance, 9% have preferred low importance and 1% have preferred least
importance to apparel product factors. For price factors 34% of the respondents have
preferred high importance, 24% have preferred medium importance, 22% have preferred
low importance, 12% have preferred least importance and 8% have preferred most
importance, to apparel price factors. For place factors, 36% of the respondents have
preferred medium importance, 35% have preferred high importance, 19% have preferred
low importance, 5% have preferred least importance and 4% have preferred most
importance, to apparel place factors. For promotional factors, 45% of the respondents
have preferred medium importance, 27% have preferred high importance, 14% have
preferred low importance, 9% have preferred most importance, and 5% have preferred
least importance to apparel promotional factors.
Table 4. Importance Of Marketing Mix Factors
IMPORTANCE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
AIMA Journal of Management & Research, October 2015, Volume 9 Issue 3/4, ISSN 0974 – 497 Copy
right© 2015 AJMR-AIMA Page 9
Product
Factors
Least 1 1
Low 9 9
Medium 53 53
High 25 25
Most 12 12
Total 100 100.0
Price Factors
Least 12 12
Low 22 22
Medium 24 24
High 34 34
Most 8 8
Total 100 100.0
Place Factors Least 5 5
Low 19 19
Medium 36 36
High 35 35
Most 4 4
Total 100 100.0
Promotional
Factors
Least 5 5
Low 14 14
Medium 45 45
High 27 27
Most 9 9
Total 100 100.0
Chi –Square Test
The chi-square was done to measure the actual divergence of the observed and expected
frequencies of various variables.
Chi-square Test: Gender vs factors
Table 5. Chi-square Test : Gender vs factors
S.No Factors 2 df
Significance (5%
level)
1 Product Factors 10.496 4 Significant
2 Price Factors 8.011 4 Not Significant
3 Place Factors 11.813 4 Significant
AIMA Journal of Management & Research, October 2015, Volume 9 Issue 3/4, ISSN 0974 – 497 Copy
right© 2015 AJMR-AIMA Page 10
4 Promotional Factors 10.394 4 Significant
5 Searching for new apparel 6.135 1 Significant
6 Time for buying new
apparel 6.159 2 Significant
From the table 5, it is observed that there is no significant difference in frequencies
between gender and price factors and there is a significant difference between gender and
product, price, promotional factors, searching for new apparel and time for buying new
apparel.
Chi-square Test: Education vs factors
Table 6. Chi-square Test : Education vs factors
S.No Factors 2 Value df
Significance (5%
level)
1 Product Factors 23.708 12 Significant
2 Price Factors 21.209 12 Significant
3 Place Factors 23.708 12 Significant
4 Promotional Factors 27.663 12 Significant
5 Comparing Quality 8.700 3 Significant
6 Pairs To Buy 20.792 6 Significant
From the table 6, it is observed that there is a significant difference in frequencies
between education and product, price, place, promotional factors, comparing quality and
pairs to buy.
Chi-square Test: Type of college vs factors
Table 7 Chi-square Test : Type of college vs factors
S.No Factors 2 Value df
Significance
(5% level)
1 Product Factors 50.216 12 Significant
2 Price Factors 23.449 12 Significant
3 Place Factors 23.027 12 Significant
4 Promotional Factors 34.282 12 Significant
5 Get The Information 25.994 9 Significant
6 Pairs To Buy 23.947 6 Significant
From the table 7, it is observed that there is a significant difference in frequencies
between type of college and product, price, place, promotional factors, get the
information and pairs to buy.
Findings, Suggestion and Conclusion
AIMA Journal of Management & Research, October 2015, Volume 9 Issue 3/4, ISSN 0974 – 497 Copy
right© 2015 AJMR-AIMA Page 11
Findings
The finding for Consumer decision shows that
- 39% of the respondents reported that the reason for buying apparel was
occasions
- 50% of the respondents reported that friends were the influencers of apparel
purchase decision,
- 42% of the respondents reported that friends accompany during apparel
purchase.
- 36% of the respondents reported they got information about the apparel from
leaflet and brochure,
- 51% of the respondents reported they searched information before shopping
- 40% of the respondents reported they consult with old users, on apparel
information.
- 92% of the respondents compare the quality and price of other shops before
purchase.
The finding for consumer apparel buying shows that
- 69% of the respondents buy two of apparel each time.
- 52% of the respondents bought 4 to 6 pairs of new apparel during last year.
- 66% respondents willing to pay Rs.2001-3000 for a pair of apparel.
- 86% of the respondents bought apparel from retail shop
- 59% of the respondents buy apparel every three month
- 43% of the respondents preferred same old brand & new style
The finding for importance of Marketing mix factors of apparel shows that
- 53% of the respondents have preferred medium importance, to apparel product
factors
- 34% of the respondents have preferred high importance, to apparel price factors.
- 36% of the respondents have preferred medium importance, to apparel place
factors.
- 45% of the respondents have preferred medium importance, to apparel
promotional factors.
The finding of chi-square test shows that
- there is no significant difference in frequencies between gender and price
factors
- there is a significant difference between gender and product, price,
promotional factors, searching for new apparel and time for buying new
apparel.
- there is a significant difference in frequencies between education and product,
price, place, promotional factors, comparing quality and pairs to buy.
AIMA Journal of Management & Research, October 2015, Volume 9 Issue 3/4, ISSN 0974 – 497 Copy
right© 2015 AJMR-AIMA Page 12
- there is a significant difference in frequencies between type of college and
product, price, place, promotional factors, get the information and pairs to
buy.
Suggestion
As friends play significant role in apparel purchase behaviour of college students, the
apparel retailers should consider making strategies involving friendship. Promotional
techniques may include themes related to friendship. They may hire college students as
promotional ambassadors for their brand. They may use these students to do promote
through social media marketing websites like Facebook, Twitter, etc. Social media
marketing is nowadays must for apparel stores. College students are information seeking
consumers about the apparel, through leaflets & brochures, old users etc. before purchase,
the retailers should make attractive and informative leaflets and brochures both in hard
copy and soft copy and have it distributed to the college students appropriately.
Considerable amount of college students searched information about apparel before
shopping, they consulted with old users, on apparel information and compared the quality
and price of other shops before purchase. They are interested in buying apparel in number
of pairs, promotional scheme of combo pack offer may be used. Normally they buy 4-6
pairs per year and 3-4 times they do apparel purchase per year, the apparel stores should
come up with very good attractive loyalty programmes to attract the college students to
their stores every time.
As college students have considerable degree of brand loyalty, the branding, brand
positioning and brand repositioning of the apparel is inevitable. Apparel stores may have
tie-ups with the various colleges in various ways like sponsorships, social programmes,
conducting events, etc.
Promotional schemes may be linked to the study performance of the students. As there is
a significant difference in purchase behaviour of apparel between male and female
students the apparel stores should consider targeting these two groups separately.
Conclusion
College student consumer segment in India is one of the significant target market
segment for apparels. This segment provides very good business opportunities for apparel
retailers, particularly branded apparel retailers. The mind set of these target customers
changes very quickly because of various factors like social media, communication
technologies, etc. Catering to these consumers will be a very much challenging job. The
apparel retailers have to come up with good strategies to cater those target customers.
References
Assael H C (2005), “Consumer behaviour: A Strategic Approach”, Biztantra, New
delhi.
AIMA Journal of Management & Research, October 2015, Volume 9 Issue 3/4, ISSN 0974 – 497 Copy
right© 2015 AJMR-AIMA Page 13
“Consumer lifestyles in India”, Euromonitor, International Consumer Life styles
Database, 2005.
Deeter-Schmelz, Dawn R, Jesse N, and Daniel J., (2000), “Prestige Clothing
Shopping By Consumers: A Confirmatory Assessment And Refinement of The
Preconscale With Managerial Implications”, Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice,
Vol. 8 Issue 4, pp.43
Frank R. Kardes (2002), “Consumer Behavior And Managerial Decision Making”,
Second edition, Pearson Education.
“Indian Garments: Some Writings On The Wall”, The Indian Textile Journal, July,
2007, pp.149.
Jayashree K and Sakthivel M, (2006), “Lifestyle And Its Influence On Brand Choice
Behavour”, The Icfaian Journal of Management Research, Vol. V, No.7, pp.25 – 34.
Mulky and Nargundkar (2003), “Modernisation In Indian Retailing: Managerial And
Policy Perspectives”, UdyogPragati, vol. 27, no.2, pp. 1-8.
Paromita Goswami (2007), “Apparel Shopping Behaviour of Urban Indian College
Students”, The Icfaian Journal of Management Research, Vol. VI, No.4, pp.57 – 71.
Solomon M & Nancy R (2004), “Consumer Behaviour in Fashion”, Prentice New
Hall.
“The Apparel and Fashion Industry In India”, Images Business of Fashion, April‟08,
pp.18
“When India Goes Shopping”, Business World, 3 Dec‟07, pp.106.