Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
A preliminary Checklist and diversity of Avifauna in Theroor Wetland,
Kanyakumari, Tamil Nadu, India
Anandh Prasanth M1, Dr. S. Asokan2
1Research Scholar, Department of Zoology and Wildlife Biology, A.V.C College,
Mayiladuthurai, Bharathidasan University, Tamil Nadu, India.
2Principal (Retd) Post Graduate and Research Department of Zoology and
Wildlife Biology,A.V.C. College (Autonomous), Mayiladuthurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Presently Controller of Examinations, Periyar Maniammai Institute of Science and
Technology, Tanjore, TN.
Abstract
Wetlands are integral to a healthy environment. The diversity of Birds in wetlands is
intermediary zones between permanently aquatic and dry terrestrial eco-systems. The present
study is conducted to make a preliminary checklist to birds of Theroor wetland, Kanyakumari,
Tamil nadu. A total of 73 species belonging to 33 families have been documented during the
present study. Major birds of study belong to the feeding guild Carnivores with 23 species. The
seasonal distribution of birds suggest Theroor wetland provide good habitat for the winter
visitors like Garganey, Northern Shoveler, Eurasian Wigeon, Northern Pintail, Common Teal.
Keywords: Wetlands, Kanyakumari, Seasonal Distribution, Feeding guild, Migratory birds.
Introduction
Birds have been described as feathered biped, warm-blooded vertebrate animals, whose
temperature remains constant and independent of the surrounding temperature (Ali 2002). Of
1318 bird species found in India (Praveen et al. 2016), 310 species are known to be dependent
on wetlands (Kumar et al. 2005; Kumar & Gupta 2009, 2013).
India has totally 27403 wetlands which cover an area of about 58.2 million hectares
(Prasad et al. 2002) of which 23444 are inland wetlands and remaining 3959 are coastal
wetlands (Rajakumar 2012). In Tamil Nadu it was estimated that 31 natural wetlands covering
an area of 58,068 hectares and 20,030 manmade wetlands with an area of 201,132 hectares
(Venkatraman 2005).
Birds are commonly used as surrogates of biodiversity owing to the wide availability
of relevant data on their distribution and status (Gregory et al. 2003; Gregory 2006; Eglington
et al. 2012). which use wetland as a source of drinking water and for feeding, resting, shelter,
and social interactions (Rajpar & Zakaria, 2011).
Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology
Volume XII, Issue IV, 2020
ISSN No : 1006-7930
Page No: 1971
Wetlands are transitional zones between permanently aquatic and dry terrestrial eco-
systems. According to the Ramsar convention, wetlands are “… areas of marsh, fen, peatland
or water, whether natural or artificial, permanent or temporary, with water that is static or
flowing, fresh, brackish or salt, including areas of marine water the depth of which at low tide
does not exceed six metres.” (Ramsar Convention, 1971, Article 1.1).
Wetlands and water birds are inseparable elements, the water birds occupy several
trophic levels in the food web of wetland nutrient cycles (Rajashekara & Venkatesha 2010).
Assemblage of bird species density, diversity, richness and relative abundance in a habitat are
affected by various factors like food availability, water level, quality of water, the size and the
abiotic factors in the wetland (Manikannan 2011; Paracuellos 2006; Jaksic 2004; Lagos et al.
2008).
Wetlands are the main custodians of the water birds (Weller 1999; Stewart 2001). As
they attract huge number of migratory and resident bird due to high nutritional value and
productivity (Manikannan et al. 2012).
Both natural and artificial wetlands, support a high diversity of resident and migrant
waterbirds (Amezaga et al. 2002). They are the most threatened habitats and are considered to
be the most important to be conserved, and they provide for the most endangered taxa
(Costanza et al. 1997; Junk et al. 2013).
Anthropogenic activities like discharging of domestic sewage, discharging of industrial
effluent, dumping of solid waste, over exploitation of their natural resources and conversion of
wetlands in to barren lands are the major factor for the loss of biodiversity (Ramachandra
2006).
Kanyakumari District is located towards the southern tip of the Indian peninsula and
therefore provide critical wintering habitats for many migrant species (Abhisheka et al. 2012).
Previous studies like diversity of birds in Theroor pond I and pond II which consists of 25 and
28 species respectively (Vijayan et al. 2006). The studies conducted by earlier workers
documented limited number of birds of the study site. Hence this study focus on preparing a
preliminary checklist to the Theroor wetland with seasonal distribution of birds.
Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology
Volume XII, Issue IV, 2020
ISSN No : 1006-7930
Page No: 1972
Materials and Methods
Study Area
Fig: 1 Satellite view of the Study area – Theroor Wetland
Fig: 2 Study area – Theroor Wetland
Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology
Volume XII, Issue IV, 2020
ISSN No : 1006-7930
Page No: 1973
The Theroor wetlands (8°10′45″N 77°27′45″E) is a part of Suchindram Theroor Birds
Sanctuary, situated near Suchindram town in Kanyakumari District, Tamil Nadu, India. It is a
protected area comprising an area of about 419acres. The local people were extensively using
this wetland for irrigation and it Ayacut is about 2728 acres. The study area is surrounded by
paddy field and human habitation, it underlies the southernmost continental range of the
Central Asian Flyway. This area is considered as Important Bird Area (Code No. IN279).
Bird surveys were conducted at twice in month, in Theroor Bird Sanctuary from Aug
2018 to July 2019. Birds were counted by the “direct count” and “total count” methods (Bibby
et al. 2000). In “direct count” method a suitable vantage point was selected and all the visible
birds were counted. Another method “total count” was used wherever possible, by walking
around the wetlands or from specific vantage points to count the birds. Systematically this
survey was conducted in morning around 6.00 hrs to 10.00 hrs. Birds were recognised in the
field by using Nikon (12x50 mm) binoculars. Photographs were taken to identify the birds
whenever possible and the bird’s identification is confirmed using standard field guides like
Birds of the Indian subcontinent and Birds of Southern India (Grimmett & Inskipp 1999;
Grimmett & Inskipp 2007) were used for field identification. The study area, experiencing sub-
tropical climate, has four seasons: Monsoon (June– Sept), Post-Monsoon (Oct–Dec), Summer
(Mar-May) and the Winter (Jan-Feb).
The birds were categorized based on the migratory status into Resident (R), Winter
Migrant (WM) and Local Migrant (R/M). Based on the feeding guild the birds were categorized
into Herbivore (HR), Piscivore (PI), Omnivore (OM), Insectivore (IN), Frugivore (FR) and
Carnivore (CA) following Ali and Ripley (1987). The statistical analysis Species Diversity,
Dominance, Pielou’s Evenness and Margalef Richness was done using MS-Excel 2010 and
Past3.
Result and Discussion
Table 1, shows that 73 species of birds were encountered in the Theroor wetlands,
Kanyakumari District from Aug 2018 to July 2019. belonging to genera, 33 families under 14
orders were recorded from as per the IUCN Category, 4 species are classified as Near
threatened and the remaining 69 species, Least concern (Figure 5). The current study revealed
that, the 73 species in Theroor Wetland supports 8% Winter Migrants, 30% Resident/Migrants
(Local migrants) and 62% of the species as resident (Figure 4).
Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology
Volume XII, Issue IV, 2020
ISSN No : 1006-7930
Page No: 1974
Fig. 3 Feeding Guild of Birds in Theroor Wetland
The migrant species includes species such as Garganey, Northern Shoveler, Eurasian
Wigeon, Northern Pintail, Common Teal, Cotton Teal and Western Marsh Harrier. Residents
birds include Near Threatened species like Black-headed Ibis. Local Migrants include Near
Threatened species include Painted Stork, Spot-billed Pelican and Oriental Darter. In the
present study, 33 families were documented during the entire study period in Theroor wetland
(Table 1). Among them, Anatidae was the dominant family with 9 species, followed by
Ardeidae (8 species), Accipitridae (5 species), Rallidae (5 species) Alcedinidae (3 species) and
Motacillidae (3 species).
Fig: 4 Migratory Status of the Birds in Theroor Wetland
23
23
7
13
21
15
7
0
5
10
15
20
25
CA FR GR HR IN NE NE/FR OM PI
No
. of
Ind
ivid
ual
s
Feeding Guild
45, 62%
22, 30%
6, 8%
R
R/M
WM
Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology
Volume XII, Issue IV, 2020
ISSN No : 1006-7930
Page No: 1975
The Guild-wise analysis of the 73 species shows that 23 species of birds are Carnivores,
15 species are Omnivores, 13 species are Insectivores, 7 species are Herbivores and Piscivores
each (Figure 3).
Fig: 5 IUCN Status of the Birds in Theroor Wetland
Fig: 6 WPA Status of the Birds in Theroor Wetland
As shown in Fig. 6 Maximum species falls under Schedule IV (92%), followed by
Schedule I (7%) and Schedule V (1%). The diversity analysis (Table 2), reveals maximum
species was observed during the month of January (69) and March (69) and it is followed by
November (67), December (67), October (66) and May (66). The Shannon-wiener diversity,
Simpson Reciprocal index and Evenness was maximum during the month of August. Margalef
LC, 69, 95%
NT, 4, 5%
LC
NT
7%
92%
1%
Sch-I
Sch-IV
Sch-V
Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology
Volume XII, Issue IV, 2020
ISSN No : 1006-7930
Page No: 1976
Richness was maximum during the month of January and it is followed by March, May and
July. The seasonal diversity study (Table 3), reveals that the maximum species was observed
during Post-Monsoon (71 species), Winter (71 species), Summer (71 species) and it is followed
by Monsoon (61 species). The Shannon wiener diversity was maximum during the summer
season (3.419). Evenness was maximum during the Monsoon season and Margalef richness
was maximum during the winter season as it harbours large number of migratory birds to the
wetland.
Vijayan et al. 2006 in their study, reported good population of Near threatened Species
like Spot-billed pelican, Painted stork and Oriental darter. In the past decades, the population
of little cormorant, cattle egret and Garganey population was declining due to the
anthropogenic activity and over growth of aquatic weeds. The rapid decrease in wetland
reduced the stop over sites of the migratory birds, which lead to the protection of wetlands for
the migrants as well as resident birds (Prasad et al. 2004).
It is a fact that, if the quality of wetland habitat is substantially reduced, populations of
wetland dependent birds in the area also can be expected to decrease. One of the best-known
functions of wetlands is to provide a habitat for birds, which act as a surrogate for biodiversity
and Wetland ecosystem. So, it may be suggested that drastic steps must be taken to preserve
wetlands and to save wetland birds.
References
Abhisheka, K., K.S. Seshadri, M.B. Prashanth & T. Ganesh (2012). The Agasthyamalai
landscape: Land of mountains, wetlands and biodiversity. Sanctuary Asia XXXII(4):
44–47.
Ali, S. & S.D. Ripley (1987). Compact handbook of Birds of India and Pakistan together with
those of Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, and Srilanka. Oxford University Press.
Ali, S. (2002). The Book of Indian Birds (13th ed.). Mumbai: Bombay Natural History Society,
pp: 326.
Amezaga, J.M., L. Santamaría & A.J. Green (2002). Biotic wetland connectivity -
supporting a new approach for wetland policy. Acta Oecologica, 23(3): 213–222;
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1146-609X(02)01152-9.
Bibby, C. J., N. D. Burgess, D. A. Hill & S. H. Mustoe (2000). Bird Census Techniques. 2nd
edition. Academic Press, London. 93-303pp.
Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology
Volume XII, Issue IV, 2020
ISSN No : 1006-7930
Page No: 1977
Costanza, R., R. d’Arge, R. de Groot,S. Farber, , M.Grasso, , B.Hannon,, K. Limburg,,
S.Naeem, ,R.V. O’Neill , J.Paruelo, R.G. Raskin, P. Suttonkk, & M. Van den Belt
(1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital, Nature 387:
253-260.
Eglington, S. M., D.G. Noble & R.J. Fuller (2012). A metaanalysis of spatial relationships
in species richness across taxa: Birds as indicators of wider biodiversity in temperate
regions, J. Nat. Conserv. 20: 301-309. doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2012.07.002.
Gregory, R. (2006). Birds as biodiversity indicators for Europe, Significance 3(3): 106-110.
doi:10.1111/j.1740-9713.2006.00178.x.
Gregory, R.D., D. Noble, R. Field, J. Marchant, M. Raven & D.W. Gibbons (2003). Using
birds as indicators of biodiversity, Ornis Hungarica 12- 13: 11-24.
Grimmett, R. & C. Inskipp (1999). Birds of the Indian subcontinent. Oxford University Press,
New Delhi.
Grimmett, R. & T. Inskipp (2007). Birds of Southern India. New Delhi: Om Books
International.
Junk, W. J., S. An, C.M. Finlayson, B.Gopal, J. Květ, S.A. Mitchell, W.J.Mitsch &R.D.
Robarts (2013). Current state of knowledge regarding the world’s wetlands and their
future under global climate change: a synthesis, Aquat. Sci. 75: 151-167.
doi:10.1007/s00027-012-0278-z.
Kumar, A., J.P, Sat, P.C. Tak & J.R.B. Alfred (2005). Handbook on Indian Wetland Birds
and their Conservaton. Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata, India, xxvi+468pp.
Kumar, P. & S.K. Gupta (2009). Diversity and abundance of wetland birds around
Kurukshetra, India. Our Nature 7: 212–217.
Kumar, P. & S.K. Gupta (2013). Status of wetland birds of Chhilchhila Wildlife Sanctuary,
Haryana, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 5(5): 3969–3976;
http://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o3158.3969-76
Manakadan, R. & A. Pittie (2001). Standardised common and scientific names of the birds
of the Indian subcontinent. Buceros 6(1): 1-37.
Manikannan, R (2011). Diversity of waterbirds in the Point Calimere wildlife sanctuary,
Tamil Nadu, India. Ph. D. Thesis, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil
Nadu, India.
Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology
Volume XII, Issue IV, 2020
ISSN No : 1006-7930
Page No: 1978
Manikannan, R., S. Asokan & A. Mohamed Samsoor Ali (2012). Abundance and Factors
Affecting Population Characteristics of Waders (Charadriiformes) in Great
Vedaranyam Swamp of Point Calimere Wildlife Sanctuary, South-east Coast of India.
International Journal of Ecosystem 2(1), 6-14.
Paracuellos, M. (2006). “How can habitat selection affect the use of a wetland complex by
water birds”, Biodiversity Conservation 15: 4569 – 4582.
Prasad, S.N., A.K. Jaggi, P. Kaushik, L. Vijayan, S. Muralidharan & V.S. Vijayan.
(2004). Inland wetlands of India, Conservation Atlas. Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology
and Natural History. Coimbatore, India, 222.
Praveen J., Jayapal, R., & Pittie, A. (2016). A checklist of the birds of India. Indian BIRDS,
11:113-170.
Rajakumar, R. (2012). “A Study on Aqautic Bird Diversity and Environmental Quality of
The Udhayamarthandapuram Bird Sanctuary, Thiruvarur District, Tamil Nadu, India”,
Ph.D. thesis, Tamil University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India.
Rajpar, M.N. & M. Zakaria (2011). Bird species abundance and their correlation ship with
microclimate and habitat variables at Natural Wetland Reserve, Peninsular Malaysia.
Int. J. Zool Article ID 758573, 17 pages, DOI: 10.1155/2011/758573.
Ramachandra, T.V. (2006). Soil and Groundwater Pollution from Agricultural Activities,
Commonwealth of learning, Canada and Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Printed
by Capital Publishing Company, New Delhi (Reprinted in 2009 by TERI Press, New
Delhi).
S. Rajashekara & M. G. Venkatesha (2010). The diversity and abundance of waterbirds in
lakes of Bangalore city, Karnataka, India. Biosystematica 4(2): 63-73.
Venkatraman, K. (2005). “Faunal Diversity of Tamil Nadu”. ENVIS Newsletter 2(1):152.
Vijayan, L., S. N. Prasad, N. Sridharan & M. B. Guptha (2006). Status of wetlands and
wetland birds in selected districts of tamilnadu. Report by Salim Ali Centre for
Ornithology and Natural History. Pp: 64.
Weller, M.W. (1999). Wetland bird habitat resources and conservation implications. Press
syndicate of the University of Cambridge, United Kingdom, 316.
Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology
Volume XII, Issue IV, 2020
ISSN No : 1006-7930
Page No: 1979
Table: 1 Checklist to the Birds of Theroor Wetland during the study period Aug 2018 to July 2019
SI.No Order Family Common Name Scientific Name IUCN
Category
WPA
Sch
Foragin
g Guild
Migrator
y Status
1 Anseriformes Anatidae Lesser Whistling
Duck
Dendrocygna javanica LC Sch-
IV
HR R
2 Anseriformes Anatidae Garganey Spatula querquedula LC Sch-
IV
OM WM
3 Anseriformes Anatidae Northern Shoveler Spatula clypeata LC Sch-
IV
OM WM
4 Anseriformes Anatidae Eurasian Wigeon Mareca penelope LC Sch-
IV
HR WM
5 Anseriformes Anatidae Indian Spot-billed
Duck
Anas poecilorhyncha LC Sch-
IV
HR R
6 Anseriformes Anatidae Northern Pintail Anas acuta LC Sch-
IV
OM WM
7 Anseriformes Anatidae Common Teal Anas crecca LC Sch-
IV
HR WM
8 Anseriformes Anatidae Comb Duck Sarkidiornis melanotos LC Sch-
IV
HR R
9 Anseriformes Anatidae Cotton Teal Nettapus
coromandelianus
LC Sch-
IV
OM WM
10 Podicipediformes Podicipedidae Little Grebe Tachybaptus ruficollis LC Sch-
IV
CA R
11 Columbiformes Columbidae Spotted Dove Streptopelia chinensis LC Sch-
IV
GR R
12 Caprimulgiforme
s
Apodidae Asian Palm Swift Cypsiurus balasiensis LC Sch-
IV
IN R
13 Cuculiformes Cuculidae Greater Coucal Centropus sinensis LC Sch-
IV
CA R
14 Cuculiformes Cuculidae Asian Koel Eudynamys
scolopaceus
LC Sch-
IV
OM R
Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology
Volume XII, Issue IV, 2020
ISSN No : 1006-7930
Page No: 1980
15 Gruiformes Rallidae White-breasted
Waterhen
Amaurornis
phoenicurus
LC Sch-
IV
OM R
16 Gruiformes Rallidae Watercock Gallicrex cinerea LC Sch-
IV
HR R
17 Gruiformes Rallidae Purple Swamphen Porphyrio porphyrio LC Sch-
IV
OM R
18 Gruiformes Rallidae Common
Moorhen
Gallinula chloropus LC Sch-
IV
OM R
19 Gruiformes Rallidae Common Coot Fulica atra LC Sch-
IV
HR R/M
20 Ciconiiformes Ciconiidae Painted Stork Mycteria leucocephala NT Sch-
IV
PI R/M
21 Ciconiiformes Ciconiidae Asian Openbill Anastomus oscitans LC Sch-
IV
CA R
22 Pelecaniformes Pelecanidae Spot-billed
Pelican
Pelecanus philippensis NT Sch-
IV
PI R/M
23 Pelecaniformes Ardeidae Yellow Bittern Ixobrychus sinensis LC Sch-
IV
CA R/M
24 Pelecaniformes Ardeidae Indian Pond
Heron
Ardeola grayii LC Sch-
IV
CA R
25 Pelecaniformes Ardeidae Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis LC Sch-
IV
CA R/M
26 Pelecaniformes Ardeidae Grey Heron Ardea cinerea LC Sch-
IV
CA R/M
27 Pelecaniformes Ardeidae Purple Heron Ardea purpurea LC Sch-
IV
CA R/M
28 Pelecaniformes Ardeidae Great Egret Ardea alba LC Sch-
IV
CA R/M
29 Pelecaniformes Ardeidae Intermediate Egret Ardea intermedia LC Sch-
IV
CA R/M
30 Pelecaniformes Ardeidae Little Egret Egretta garzetta LC Sch-
IV
CA R/M
Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology
Volume XII, Issue IV, 2020
ISSN No : 1006-7930
Page No: 1981
31 Pelecaniformes Threskiornithidae Black-headed Ibis Threskiornis
melanocephalus
NT Sch-
IV
CA R
32 Pelecaniformes Threskiornithidae Indian Black Ibis Pseudibis papillosa LC Sch-
IV
OM R
33 Pelecaniformes Threskiornithidae Glossy Ibis Plegadis falcinellus LC Sch-
IV
CA R/M
34 Suliformes Phalacrocoracida
e
Little Cormorant Microcarbo niger LC Sch-
IV
PI R/M
35 Suliformes Phalacrocoracida
e
Indian Cormorant Phalacrocorax
fuscicollis
LC Sch-
IV
PI R/M
36 Suliformes Anhingidae Oriental Darter Anhinga melanogaster NT Sch-
IV
PI R/M
37 Charadriiformes Charadriidae Red-wattled
Lapwing
Vanellus indicus LC Sch-
IV
CA R
38 Charadriiformes Jacanidae Pheasant-tailed
Jacana
Hydrophasianus
chirurgus
LC Sch-
IV
OM R
39 Charadriiformes Jacanidae Bronze-winged
Jacana
Metopidius indicus LC Sch-
IV
OM R
40 Charadriiformes Scolopacidae Common Snipe Gallinago gallinago LC Sch-
IV
CA R/M
41 Charadriiformes Scolopacidae Common
Sandpiper
Actitis hypoleucos LC Sch-
IV
IN R/M
42 Charadriiformes Laridae Whiskered Tern Chlidonias hybrida LC Sch-
IV
PI R/M
43 Accipitriformes Accipitridae Short-toed Snake
Eagle
Circaetus gallicus LC Sch-I CA R
44 Accipitriformes Accipitridae Western Marsh
Harrier
Circus aeruginosus LC Sch-I CA WM
45 Accipitriformes Accipitridae Shikra Accipiter badius LC Sch-I CA R
46 Accipitriformes Accipitridae Brahminy Kite Haliastur indus LC Sch-I CA R
47 Accipitriformes Accipitridae Black Kite Milvus migrans LC Sch-I CA R
Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology
Volume XII, Issue IV, 2020
ISSN No : 1006-7930
Page No: 1982
48 Coraciiformes Coraciidae Indian Roller Coracias benghalensis LC Sch-
IV
CA R
49 Coraciiformes Alcedinidae Common
Kingfisher
Alcedo atthis LC Sch-
IV
CA R
50 Coraciiformes Alcedinidae Pied Kingfisher Ceryle rudis LC Sch-
IV
PI R
51 Coraciiformes Alcedinidae White-throated
Kingfisher
Halcyon smyrnensis LC Sch-
IV
CA R
52 Psittaciformes Psittaculidae Rose-ringed
Parakeet
Psittacula krameri LC Sch-
IV
FR R
53 Passeriformes Dicruridae Black Drongo Dicrurus macrocercus LC Sch-
IV
IN R
54 Passeriformes Corvidae House Crow Corvus splendens LC Sch-V OM R
55 Passeriformes Corvidae Large-billed Crow Corvus macrorhynchos LC Sch-
IV
OM R
56 Passeriformes Dicaeidae Pale-billed
Flowerpecker
Dicaeum
erythrorhynchos
LC Sch-
IV
NE/FR R
57 Passeriformes Nectariniidae Purple-rumped
Sunbird
Leptocoma zeylonica LC Sch-
IV
NE R
58 Passeriformes Nectariniidae Purple Sunbird Cinnyris asiaticus LC Sch-
IV
NE R
59 Passeriformes Estrildidae Scaly-breasted
Munia
Lonchura punctulata LC Sch-
IV
GR R
60 Passeriformes Estrildidae Tricoloured
Munia
Lonchura malacca LC Sch-
IV
GR R
61 Passeriformes Motacillidae Paddyfield Pipit Anthus rufulus LC Sch-
IV
IN R
62 Passeriformes Motacillidae Western Yellow
Wagtail
Motacilla flava LC Sch-
IV
IN R/M
63 Passeriformes Motacillidae White-browed
Wagtail
Motacilla
maderaspatensis
LC Sch-
IV
IN R
Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology
Volume XII, Issue IV, 2020
ISSN No : 1006-7930
Page No: 1983
64 Passeriformes Cisticolidae Common
Tailorbird
Orthotomus sutorius LC Sch-
IV
IN R
65 Passeriformes Acrocephalidae Booted Warbler Iduna caligata LC Sch-
IV
IN R/M
66 Passeriformes Acrocephalidae Blyth's Reed
Warbler
Acrocephalus
dumetorum
LC Sch-
IV
IN R/M
67 Passeriformes Hirundinidae Red-rumped
Swallow
Cecropis daurica LC Sch-
IV
IN R/M
68 Passeriformes Hirundinidae Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica LC Sch-
IV
IN R/M
69 Passeriformes Pycnonotidae Red-vented
Bulbul
Pycnonotus cafer LC Sch-
IV
FR R
70 Passeriformes Leiothrichidae Yellow-billed
Babbler
Turdoides affinis LC Sch-
IV
IN R
71 Passeriformes Sturnidae Common Myna Acridotheres tristis LC Sch-
IV
OM R
72 Passeriformes Sturnidae Jungle Myna Acridotheres fuscus LC Sch-
IV
OM R
73 Passeriformes Muscicapidae Oriental Magpie
Robin
Copsychus saularis LC Sch-
IV
IN R
Status: R/M-Local Migrant; R-Resident; WM-Winter Migrant.
Feeding Guild: Herbivore (HR), Piscivore (PI), Omnivore (OM), Insectivore (IN), Frugivore (FR), Granivore (GR), Nectarivore (NE) and
Carnivore (CA)
International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) categories: LC - least concern; NT - near-threatened.
* The information is based on the IUCN Red List (IUCN 2019).
Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology
Volume XII, Issue IV, 2020
ISSN No : 1006-7930
Page No: 1984
Table: 2 Ecological Indices of the Birds in Theroor Wetland from Aug 2018 to July 2018
Ecological Indices Months
Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June july
No. of Species 60 57 66 67 67 69 65 69 58 62 61 60
No. of Individuals 623 529 1210 1834 1651 1158 1412 1266 688 739 730 605
Dominance 0.04971 0.05 0.0976 0.1425 0.1063 0.06314 0.07246 0.07695 0.0589 0.07716 0.1068 0.06538
Simpson Diversity 0.9503 0.95 0.9024 0.8575 0.8937 0.9369 0.9275 0.923 0.9411 0.9228 0.8932 0.9346
Shannon wiener
Diversity
3.509 3.449 3.054 2.672 2.873 3.288 3.122 3.214 3.332 3.18 3.048 3.306
Pielou's Evenness 0.5568 0.5519 0.3213 0.216 0.2641 0.3883 0.349 0.3605 0.4826 0.3879 0.3455 0.4544
Margalef Richness 9.169 8.93 9.157 8.783 8.908 9.639 8.824 9.519 8.724 9.235 9.1 9.211
Table: 3 Seasonal Ecological Indices of the Birds in Theroor Wetland
Ecological Indices Seasons
Post-Monsoon Winter Summer Monsoon
No.of Species 71 71 71 61
No. of Individuals 4695 2570 2693 2487
Dominance 0.1143 0.06494 0.056 0.06052
Simpson Diversity 0.8857 0.9351 0.944 0.9395
Shannon wiener Diversity 2.887 3.237 3.419 3.385
Pielou's Evenness 0.2527 0.3586 0.4299 0.4841
Margalef Richness 8.28 8.915 8.863 7.674
Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology
Volume XII, Issue IV, 2020
ISSN No : 1006-7930
Page No: 1985