1
A Multiplex Molecular Diagnostic Platform and Test for Identication of Staphylococcus species and Detection of the mecA gene Directly from Positive Blood Cultures Authors: B. Hicke 1 , R. Jenison 1 , C. Pasko 1 , J. Dunn 1 , H. Koss Jaeckel 1 , D. Nieuwlandt 1 , M. West 1 , E. Woodru 1 , L. Rea 1 , D. Weed 2 , G. Denys 3 , X. Zheng 4 ; 1. Great Basin Diagnostics, Salt Lake City, UT, 2. Denver Hlth.Med. Ctr., Denver, CO, 3. Indiana Univ. Hlth.Pathology Lab., Indianapolis, IN, 4. Children’s Mem. Hosp.. Northwestern Univ. Feinberg Sch. of Med., Chicago, IL. Abstract Background: Staphylococcal blood stream infections are increasingly prevalent and cause high morbidity and mortality. An automated molecular diagnostic platform, Portrait Dx, consists of a disposable cartridge run by a small instrument. The system combines multiplex amplication with multiplex chip-based detection. Here we de- scribe development of the Staph ID/R assay for simultaneous identication of 8 Staphylococcal spp and the mecA gene. A blinded study of clinical blood culture samples compares Staph ID/R to an automated biochemical detection system. Methods: Gene sequences were aligned and primers were identied that use Helicase-Dependent Amplication (HDA) to amplify conserved regions of the tuf and mecA genes. An array of hybridization probes was immobilized onto a silicon surface. For blood culture testing, a 50 uL blood culture aliquot was extracted enzy- matically for 10 min, amplied for 30 min, and hybridized for 5 minutes producing produces eye-visible signals. Phenotypic determination of species results and methicillin-resistance was performed on the MicroScan. For discrepant results, de- nitive species identication was achieved by sequencing of rpoB and/or 16S rDNA genes, and denitive methicillin resistance was determined by growth on oxacillin- containing agar. Results: The limit of detection for S. aureus was 3e3 CFU/mL, or 1 copy of input DNA, placing sensitivity on par with real-time PCR. 8 Staph spp, were identied and re- solved with limits of detection ranging from 1-250 CFU/reaction. In a blinded study using clinical blood culture samples, the Microscan biochemical system correctly identied 93/98 samples that were mono-microbial infections for species and methicillin-resistance results, while Staph ID/R correctly identied 98/98 for bacterial species and methicillin-resistance. In 5 poly-microbial cultures Microscan was cor- rect in 0/5 samples while Staph ID/R identied 4/5 samples correctly as dened by detection of all Staphylococcal species present in each sample. Conclusion: Staph ID/R shows high sensitivity and specicity, equivalent to the gold standard for Staphyloccocal species identication, rpoB gene sequencing. Staph ID/R represents an eective, low-cost, user-friendly approach to blood culture detec- tion of S aureus and additional spp along with methicillin resistance. HDA and eye- visible detection together permit low-cost instrumentation. Clinical evaluations of the Portrait Dx platform are in progress at several sites. Limit of Detection Results Limit of detection was determined for various Staphylococcal strains using tuf (species) and mecA (methicillin-resistance) duplex amplication reactions, and ranged from 3 x 10 3 to 1 x 10 6 CFU/mL Analytical reactivity was demonstrated for 25 unique Staphylococ- cus strains representing 19 dierent species (data not shown). All amplied species reacted with the Staphylococcus genus control set except S. lentus and S. succinus, as expected. Each species- specic probe reacted with cognate Staphylococcal species ampli- con with high specicity. The probe set described here showed no cross-reactivity with a panel of non-cognate bacteria except E. fa- caelis, which reacted with the Staphylococcus genus probe set. This was expected and an E. facaelis-specic probe was created to dis- tinguish it from Staphylococcus in the panel. In a blinded study, 103 frozen blood culture samples positive for Gram positive cocci in clusters (GPCC) were tested. The distribution of species including methicillin-resistance determination is shown in Table 2. There was agreement on 93/98 samples from mono- microbial GPCC positive blood cultures between Staph ID/R and MicroScan. Resolution of discordant results with RpoB gene se- quencing correlated in all cases with Staph ID/R. For poly-microbial GPCC positive blood cultures, Staph ID/R found multiple Staphylococcus or E. facaelis organisms in each sample and was concordant with RpoB gene sequencing in all cases but one. MicroScan found only one Staphylococcus or E. fa- caelis organism in each sample. In two poly-microbial cases, MicroScan reported MRSA only whereas Staph ID/R detected a mix- ture of S. aureus, S. haemolyticus, and mecA in one and S. aureus, S. epidermidis, and mecA in another (Table 3). In one sample, mauve colonies were observed on ChromAgar MRSA, indicating the presence of MRSA. In the other case, mauve colonies were observed on ChromAgar SA, indicating S. aureus was present, but on ChromAgar only white colonies were observed. Sequenc- ing of this colony indicated that the methcilillin-resistant organism was S. epidermidis. Results Limit of detection was determined for various Staphylococcal strains using tuf (species) and mecA (methicillin-resistance) duplex amplication reactions, and ranged from 3 x 10 3 to 1 x 10 6 CFU/mL Analytical reactivity was demonstrated for 25 unique Staphylococ- cus strains representing 19 dierent species (data not shown). All amplied species reacted with the Staphylococcus genus control set except S. lentus and S. succinus, as expected. Each species- specic probe reacted with cognate Staphylococcal species ampli- con with high specicity. The probe set described here showed no cross-reactivity with a panel of non-cognate bacteria except E. fa- caelis, which reacted with the Staphylococcus genus probe set. This was expected and an E. facaelis-specic probe was created to dis- tinguish it from Staphylococcus in the panel. In a blinded study, 103 frozen blood culture samples positive for Gram positive cocci in clusters (GPCC) were tested. The distribution of species including methicillin-resistance determination is shown in Table 2. There was agreement on 93/98 samples from mono- microbial GPCC positive blood cultures between Staph ID/R and MicroScan. Resolution of discordant results with RpoB gene se- quencing correlated in all cases with Staph ID/R. For poly-microbial GPCC positive blood cultures, Staph ID/R found multiple Staphylococcus or E. facaelis organisms in each sample and was concordant with RpoB gene sequencing in all cases but one. MicroScan found only one Staphylococcus or E. fa- caelis organism in each sample. In two poly-microbial cases, MicroScan reported MRSA only whereas Staph ID/R detected a mix- ture of S. aureus, S. haemolyticus, and mecA in one and S. aureus, S. epidermidis, and mecA in another (Table 3). In one sample, mauve colonies were observed on ChromAgar MRSA, indicating the presence of MRSA. In the other case, mauve colonies were observed on ChromAgar SA, indicating S. aureus was present, but on ChromAgar only white colonies were observed. Sequenc- ing of this colony indicated that the methcilillin-resistant organism was S. epidermidis. Capture probes are immobilized to the silicon surface. A diagonal set of control features veries that chip orientation (COF), DNA extraction and amplication (EAC), and detection (HC, DC) functioned properly, validating test results. Conclusions The Staph ID/R test was shown to rapidly identify the major Staphylococcus species and the mecA gene, which confers re- sistance to methicillin, directly from positive blood culture ali- quots with high concordance compared to the standard of RpoB and 16S gene sequencing. Additionally, the test demon- strated the ability to detect more than one organism in a poly- microbial positive blood culture bottle. Information about the species present and whether or not it harbors the mecA gene can aid in patient management. In the case of MRSA/MSSA tests the value has been clearly shown that a rapid test result lead to shorter hospital length of stay and lower treatment costs due to the initiation of ap- propriate therapy sooner. By additionally providing knowledge about the potential methicillin-resistance status of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, treatment can be adjusted to beta- lactam drugs for methicillin-sensitive infections which lead to improved outcomes compared with treatment with vancomycin, the generally accepted drug of choice. Typically, ~30% of positive blood cultures are contami- nants, not true infections. With the knowledge of species information in positive blood cultures, Staph ID/R could be used as an approach to distinguish true infections from contaminant blood cultures with high predictive value from just two positive culture bottles. Table 1. Identication of Staphylococcus species: Micro Scan versus Portrait Staph ID/R Bacterial Identication Array War2 Epi2 Aur Aur COF Cap Epi Haem EAC Mec Sac Epi DC Hom Mec Lug HC War War Hom Succ CoSaXy Sim Sci Fae MRSA Sample Process Controls MSSA (S. aureus) S. epidermidis S. lugdunensis Feature Staph species Succ succinus CoSaXy cohnii, saprophyticus, xylosus Sim simulans Sci sciuri Fae Entercoccus faecalis Lug lugdunensis HC Hyb. Control War warneri War warneri (replicate) Hom hominis Sac saccharolyticus Epi epidermidis DC Detect Control Feature Staph species Hom hominis (replicate) Mec mecA, methicillin resistance gene Cap capitis Epi epidermidis (replicate) Haem haemolyticus EAC Extraction-Amplication Control Mec mecA, methicillin resistance gene War2 warneri variant Epi2 epidermidis variant Aur aureus Aur aureus (duplicate) COF Chip Orientation Feature Control Features MecA Gene Blood culture samples were quantitated to determine CFU/mL, then serially diluted using a blood culture control. Staph ID/R was performed manually in 96-well format. mecA detection is more sensitive than species detection due to strength of capture probe for this sequence. LODs are on par with real-time PCR methods. LODs for mixed cultures were determined by placing a xed amount of one competing bacterial species into a negative blood culture (3 x 10 7 CFU/mL) and then titrating in the species of interest. Contact: [email protected] Bacterial Limit of Detection (CFU/mL) Species Gene Pure Mixed S. hominis/novo tuf 1e3 S. epidermidis tuf 3e3 1e5 S. capitis tuf 1e5 S. lugdunensis tuf 1e6 S. haemolyticus tuf 1e4 S. aureus tuf 3e3 3e4 S. warneri tuf 1e5 E. facaelis tuf ND MRSA/MRSE mecA 1e3 1e3 Resolved Result Call by Test Species (n) Portrait Micro Scan S. aureus (19) 19 19 MRSA (6) 6 6 S. epidermidis (8) 8 8 MRSE (40) 40 40 S. hominis (2) 2 2 MR S. hominis (4) 4 4 MR S. haemolyticus (1) 1 0 S. warneri/ pasteuri (1) 2 1 MR S. warn/past (7) 6 6 S. lugdunensis 0 0 S. capitis/caprae (2) 2 1 S. genus spp unknown (1) 1 0 Non Staph E. facaelis (2) 2 2 Non Staph (5) 5 3 # Correct (%) 98 (100) 93 (94.9) Test Sub-culture Sequencing Results Results Results ID MicroScan Staph ID/R TSA ChromAgar ChromAgar MRSA RpoB gene (unique colonies) SA MRSA Screen 10 MR S. epidermidis S. epidermidis 2 blue/green blue/green Mod S. epidermidis S. haemolyticus S. haemolyticus mecA 16 E. facaelis E. facaelis 2 blue blue Mod E. facaelis S. epidermidis S. epidermidis mecA 44 MRSA S.aureus 1 mauve mauve and Light S. haemolyticus S. haemolyticus white S.aureus mecA 58 MRSA S. epidermidis 1 mauve white No S. epidermidis S. aureus S. aureus mecA 102 E. facaelis E. facaelis 2 blue blue and No S. epidermidis K. pneumoniae S. epidermidis white S. cohnii S. hominis E.facaelis mecA Table 2. Analysis of Poly-microbial Specimens Multiplex Detection. After amplifying a single locus within the tuf gene, multiple bacterial species are discriminated using unique capture probes arrayed on the chip surface. Multiple probes, coupled to multiple amplicons, produces panel assays that can detect large numbers of target organisms. Amplication and Detection Technology S. aureus S. warneri S. hominis S. epidermidis Detection Specicity. Two bacterial species, diering by a single nucleotide in the capture probe region as indicated, are distinguished by hybridization. This allows resolution of closely related species and strains. Capture Probes SA = NNNNNNNNNNNNN A NNN SW = NNNNNNNNNNNNN T NNN S. aureus S. warneri bpHDA: 17 minutes Standard HDA: 40 minutes 10000 copies 1000 copies 100 copies 10 copies 10 copies (unblocked primers) 1 copy Hot Start Amplication: Blocked primer HDA (bpHDA) uses primers bearing a 3’ blocking group to create hot start condi- tions. Deblocking requires that primers be annealed to the target DNA sequence, resulting in cleavage by RNAse H2, followed by polymerase extension. Because the RNase is inactive at low temperature, primer artifact is suppressed without need for a modied polymerase. Multiplex Amplication: proof of prin- ciple. Primer pairs for 4 dierent bacterial genes are mixed. Primers for the fourth am- plicon, a Group B streptococcus gene, are ti- trated into the bpHDA reaction at 150, 200, 250 nM each. Comparison of blocked primers with un- blocked primers. Here, bpHDA amplies 10 copies of input DNA in 17 minutes. Be- cause lower primer concentrations (100 vs 300 nM) are required to avoid amplication artifacts in standard HDA, the amplication is 23 minutes delayed. In contrast to PCR, which is rate-limited by device heating/ cooling rates bpHDA rate is device- independent and limited only by enyzme and primer concentrations. Note 1 cycle=1 minute; there is no thermal cycling. 150nM GB Strep primers 200nM GB Strep primers 250nM GB Strep primers Great Basin Cartridge and Analyzer The Staph ID/R assay is built into a injection-molded card. Reagents are lyophilized or placed in blister packs. In the instrument, optical sensors control motors that propel 10s to 100s of uL through channels and chambers. This mesouidic-scale design and injection-molded plastic card, in combination with isothermal amplication and human eye-visible signal, enables a low-cost card and instrument. The operator inserts ~50 uL blood culture into the sample port as shown, inserts the card into the desktop instrument, and initiates the test. Software automatically returns a result within 90 min. The report details the presence of staphylococci, specically identies the 12 Staph. species deemed most relevant, and indicates status of the drug resistance gene mecA. A B D C A. Detection chip B. Amplication chamber C. Sample input D. Blister packs with reagents Assay Overview Bacterial DNA is Extracted by cell lysis, then Amplied via Helicase Dependent Amplica- tion (HDA). HDA represents an isothermal alternative to PCR in which strand separation is ac- complished by a helicase rather than by heat denaturation. After amplication for 30 min at 65°C, Detection occurs: amplied DNA binds to sequence- specic capture probes. After washing, an anti-biotin antibody conjugated to Horse Radish Peroxidase (HRP) produces a visual signal via precipitation of a tetramethylbenzidine cleav- age product onto the silicon surface. Visual Readout Signal Development Hybridization Capture Biotin label HRP TMB 1 Extract DNA 2 Amplify 3 Detect

A Multiplex Molecular Diagnostic Platform and Test for

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

A Multiplex Molecular Diagnostic Platform and Test for Identi!cation of Staphylococcus species and Detection of the mecA gene Directly from Positive Blood CulturesAuthors: B. Hicke1, R. Jenison1, C. Pasko1, J. Dunn1, H. Koss Jaeckel1, D. Nieuwlandt1, M. West1, E. Woodru!1, L. Rea1, D. Weed2, G. Denys3, X. Zheng4;

1. Great Basin Diagnostics, Salt Lake City, UT, 2. Denver Hlth.Med. Ctr., Denver, CO, 3. Indiana Univ. Hlth.Pathology Lab., Indianapolis, IN, 4. Children’s Mem. Hosp.. Northwestern Univ. Feinberg Sch. of Med., Chicago, IL.

AbstractBackground: Staphylococcal blood stream infections are increasingly prevalent and cause high morbidity and mortality. An automated molecular diagnostic platform, Portrait Dx, consists of a disposable cartridge run by a small instrument. The system combines multiplex ampli"cation with multiplex chip-based detection. Here we de-scribe development of the Staph ID/R assay for simultaneous identi"cation of 8 Staphylococcal spp and the mecA gene. A blinded study of clinical blood culture samples compares Staph ID/R to an automated biochemical detection system.

Methods: Gene sequences were aligned and primers were identi"ed that use Helicase-Dependent Ampli"cation (HDA) to amplify conserved regions of the tuf and mecA genes. An array of hybridization probes was immobilized onto a silicon surface. For blood culture testing, a 50 uL blood culture aliquot was extracted enzy-matically for 10 min, ampli"ed for 30 min, and hybridized for 5 minutes producing produces eye-visible signals. Phenotypic determination of species results and methicillin-resistance was performed on the MicroScan. For discrepant results, de-"nitive species identi"cation was achieved by sequencing of rpoB and/or 16S rDNA genes, and de"nitive methicillin resistance was determined by growth on oxacillin-containing agar.

Results: The limit of detection for S. aureus was 3e3 CFU/mL, or 1 copy of input DNA, placing sensitivity on par with real-time PCR. 8 Staph spp, were identi"ed and re-solved with limits of detection ranging from 1-250 CFU/reaction. In a blinded study using clinical blood culture samples, the Microscan biochemical system correctly identi"ed 93/98 samples that were mono-microbial infections for species and methicillin-resistance results, while Staph ID/R correctly identi"ed 98/98 for bacterial species and methicillin-resistance. In 5 poly-microbial cultures Microscan was cor-rect in 0/5 samples while Staph ID/R identi"ed 4/5 samples correctly as de"ned by detection of all Staphylococcal species present in each sample.

Conclusion: Staph ID/R shows high sensitivity and speci"city, equivalent to the gold standard for Staphyloccocal species identi"cation, rpoB gene sequencing. Staph ID/R represents an e!ective, low-cost, user-friendly approach to blood culture detec-tion of S aureus and additional spp along with methicillin resistance. HDA and eye-visible detection together permit low-cost instrumentation. Clinical evaluations of the Portrait Dx platform are in progress at several sites.

Limit of Detection ResultsLimit of detection was determined for various Staphylococcal strains using tuf (species) and mecA (methicillin-resistance) duplex ampli"cation reactions, and ranged from 3 x 103 to 1 x 106 CFU/mL Analytical reactivity was demonstrated for 25 unique Staphylococ-cus strains representing 19 di!erent species (data not shown). All ampli"ed species reacted with the Staphylococcus genus control set except S. lentus and S. succinus, as expected. Each species-speci"c probe reacted with cognate Staphylococcal species ampli-con with high speci"city. The probe set described here showed no cross-reactivity with a panel of non-cognate bacteria except E. fa-caelis, which reacted with the Staphylococcus genus probe set. This was expected and an E. facaelis-speci"c probe was created to dis-tinguish it from Staphylococcus in the panel.

In a blinded study, 103 frozen blood culture samples positive for Gram positive cocci in clusters (GPCC) were tested. The distribution of species including methicillin-resistance determination is shown in Table 2. There was agreement on 93/98 samples from mono-microbial GPCC positive blood cultures between Staph ID/R and MicroScan. Resolution of discordant results with RpoB gene se-quencing correlated in all cases with Staph ID/R. For poly-microbial GPCC positive blood cultures, Staph ID/R found multiple Staphylococcus or E. facaelis organisms in each sample and was concordant with RpoB gene sequencing in all cases but one. MicroScan found only one Staphylococcus or E. fa-caelis organism in each sample. In two poly-microbial cases, MicroScan reported MRSA only whereas Staph ID/R detected a mix-ture of S. aureus, S. haemolyticus, and mecA in one and S. aureus, S. epidermidis, and mecA in another (Table 3). In one sample, mauve colonies were observed on ChromAgar MRSA, indicating the presence of MRSA. In the other case, mauve colonies were observed on ChromAgar SA, indicating S. aureus was present, but on ChromAgar only white colonies were observed. Sequenc-ing of this colony indicated that the methcilillin-resistant organism was S. epidermidis.

ResultsLimit of detection was determined for various Staphylococcal strains using tuf (species) and mecA (methicillin-resistance) duplex ampli"cation reactions, and ranged from 3 x 103 to 1 x 106 CFU/mL Analytical reactivity was demonstrated for 25 unique Staphylococ-cus strains representing 19 di!erent species (data not shown). All ampli"ed species reacted with the Staphylococcus genus control set except S. lentus and S. succinus, as expected. Each species-speci"c probe reacted with cognate Staphylococcal species ampli-con with high speci"city. The probe set described here showed no cross-reactivity with a panel of non-cognate bacteria except E. fa-caelis, which reacted with the Staphylococcus genus probe set. This was expected and an E. facaelis-speci"c probe was created to dis-tinguish it from Staphylococcus in the panel.

In a blinded study, 103 frozen blood culture samples positive for Gram positive cocci in clusters (GPCC) were tested. The distribution of species including methicillin-resistance determination is shown in Table 2. There was agreement on 93/98 samples from mono-microbial GPCC positive blood cultures between Staph ID/R and MicroScan. Resolution of discordant results with RpoB gene se-quencing correlated in all cases with Staph ID/R. For poly-microbial GPCC positive blood cultures, Staph ID/R found multiple Staphylococcus or E. facaelis organisms in each sample and was concordant with RpoB gene sequencing in all cases but one. MicroScan found only one Staphylococcus or E. fa-caelis organism in each sample. In two poly-microbial cases, MicroScan reported MRSA only whereas Staph ID/R detected a mix-ture of S. aureus, S. haemolyticus, and mecA in one and S. aureus, S. epidermidis, and mecA in another (Table 3). In one sample, mauve colonies were observed on ChromAgar MRSA, indicating the presence of MRSA. In the other case, mauve colonies were observed on ChromAgar SA, indicating S. aureus was present, but on ChromAgar only white colonies were observed. Sequenc-ing of this colony indicated that the methcilillin-resistant organism was S. epidermidis.

Capture probes are immobilized to the silicon surface. A diagonal set of control features veri"es that chip orientation (COF), DNA extraction and ampli!cation (EAC), and detection (HC, DC) functioned properly, validating test results.

ConclusionsThe Staph ID/R test was shown to rapidly identify the major Staphylococcus species and the mecA gene, which confers re-sistance to methicillin, directly from positive blood culture ali-quots with high concordance compared to the standard of RpoB and 16S gene sequencing. Additionally, the test demon-strated the ability to detect more than one organism in a poly-microbial positive blood culture bottle.

Information about the species present and whether or not it harbors the mecA gene can aid in patient management. In the case of MRSA/MSSA tests the value has been clearly shown that a rapid test result lead to shorter hospital length of stay and lower treatment costs due to the initiation of ap-propriate therapy sooner.

By additionally providing knowledge about the potential methicillin-resistance status of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, treatment can be adjusted to beta-lactam drugs for methicillin-sensitive infections which lead to improved outcomes compared with treatment with vancomycin, the generally accepted drug of choice.

Typically, ~30% of positive blood cultures are contami-nants, not true infections. With the knowledge of species information in positive blood cultures, Staph ID/R could be used as an approach to distinguish true infections from contaminant blood cultures with high predictive value from just two positive culture bottles.

Table 1.Identi!cation of Staphylococcus species: Micro Scan versus Portrait Staph ID/R

Bacterial Identi!cation Array

War2 Epi2 Aur Aur COF

Cap Epi Haem EAC Mec

Sac Epi DC Hom Mec

Lug HC War War Hom

Succ CoSaXy Sim Sci Fae

MRSASample ProcessControls

MSSA (S. aureus)

S. epidermidis S. lugdunensis

Feature Staph speciesSucc succinusCoSaXy cohnii, saprophyticus, xylosusSim simulansSci sciuriFae Entercoccus faecalisLug lugdunensisHC Hyb. ControlWar warneriWar warneri (replicate)Hom hominisSac saccharolyticusEpi epidermidisDC Detect Control

Feature Staph speciesHom hominis (replicate)Mec mecA, methicillin resistance geneCap capitisEpi epidermidis (replicate)Haem haemolyticusEAC Extraction-Ampli!cation ControlMec mecA, methicillin resistance geneWar2 warneri variantEpi2 epidermidis variantAur aureusAur aureus (duplicate)COF Chip Orientation Feature

Control Features MecA Gene

Blood culture samples were quantitated to determine CFU/mL, then serially diluted using a blood culture control. Staph ID/R was performed manually in 96-well format. mecA detection is more sensitive than species detection due to strength of capture probe for this sequence. LODs are on par with real-time PCR methods. LODs for mixed cultures were determined by placing a "xed amount of one competing bacterial species into a negative blood culture (3 x 107 CFU/mL) and then titrating in the species of interest.

Contact:  [email protected]

Bacterial Limit of Detection (CFU/mL)Species Gene Pure Mixed S. hominis/novo tuf 1e3

S. epidermidis tuf 3e3 1e5

S. capitis tuf 1e5

S. lugdunensis tuf 1e6

S. haemolyticus tuf 1e4

S. aureus tuf 3e3 3e4

S. warneri tuf 1e5

E. facaelis tuf ND

MRSA/MRSE mecA 1e3 1e3

Resolved Result Call by Test

Species (n) Portrait Micro ScanS. aureus (19) 19 19MRSA (6) 6 6S. epidermidis (8) 8 8MRSE (40) 40 40S. hominis (2) 2 2MR S. hominis (4) 4 4MR S. haemolyticus (1) 1 0S. warneri/ pasteuri (1) 2 1MR S. warn/past (7) 6 6S. lugdunensis 0 0S. capitis/caprae (2) 2 1S. genus spp unknown (1) 1 0Non Staph E. facaelis (2) 2 2Non Staph (5) 5 3

# Correct (%) 98 (100) 93 (94.9)

Test Sub-culture Sequencing Results Results ResultsID MicroScan Staph ID/R TSA ChromAgar ChromAgar MRSA RpoB gene (unique colonies) SA MRSA Screen

10 MR S. epidermidis S. epidermidis 2 blue/green blue/green Mod S. epidermidis S. haemolyticus S. haemolyticus mecA16 E. facaelis E. facaelis 2 blue blue Mod E. facaelis S. epidermidis S. epidermidis mecA44 MRSA S.aureus 1 mauve mauve and Light S. haemolyticus S. haemolyticus white S.aureus mecA58 MRSA S. epidermidis 1 mauve white No S. epidermidis S. aureus S. aureus mecA102 E. facaelis E. facaelis 2 blue blue and No S. epidermidis K. pneumoniae S. epidermidis white S. cohnii S. hominis E.facaelis mecA

Table 2. Analysis of Poly-microbial Specimens

Multiplex Detection. After amplifying a single locus within the tuf gene, multiple bacterial species are discriminated using unique capture probes arrayed on the chip surface. Multiple probes, coupled to multiple amplicons, produces panel assays that can detect large numbers of target organisms.

Ampli!cation and Detection Technology

S. aureus

S. warneri

S. hominis

S. epidermidis

Detection Speci!city. Two bacterial species, di!ering by a single nucleotide in the capture probe region as indicated, are distinguished by hybridization. This allows resolution of closely related species and strains.

Capture Probes SA = NNNNNNNNNNNNNANNN SW = NNNNNNNNNNNNNTNNN

S. aureus S. warneri

bpHDA: 17 minutes Standard HDA: 40 minutes

10000 copies1000 copies100 copies10 copies10 copies(unblocked primers)1 copy

Hot Start Ampli!cation: Blocked primer HDA (bpHDA) uses primers bearing a 3’ blocking group to create hot start condi-tions. Deblocking requires that primers be annealed to the target DNA sequence, resulting in cleavage by RNAse H2, followed by polymerase extension. Because the RNase is inactive at low temperature, primer artifact is suppressed without need for a modi"ed polymerase.

Multiplex Ampli!cation: proof of prin-ciple. Primer pairs for 4 di!erent bacterial genes are mixed. Primers for the fourth am-plicon, a Group B streptococcus gene, are ti-trated into the bpHDA reaction at 150, 200, 250 nM each.

Comparison of blocked primers with un-blocked primers. Here, bpHDA ampli"es 10 copies of input DNA in 17 minutes. Be-cause lower primer concentrations (100 vs 300 nM) are required to avoid ampli"cation artifacts in standard HDA, the ampli"cation is 23 minutes delayed. In contrast to PCR, which is rate-limited by device heating/ cooling rates bpHDA rate is device-independent and limited only by enyzme and primer concentrations. Note 1 cycle=1 minute; there is no thermal cycling.

150nM GB Strep primers200nM GB Strep primers250nM GB Strep primers

Great Basin Cartridge and Analyzer The Staph ID/R assay is built into a injection-molded card. Reagents are lyophilized or placed in blister packs. In the instrument, optical sensors control motors that propel 10s to 100s of uL through channels and chambers. This meso#uidic-scale design and injection-molded plastic card, in combination with isothermal ampli"cation and human eye-visible signal, enables a low-cost card and instrument.

The operator inserts ~50 uL blood culture into the sample port as shown, inserts the card into the desktop instrument, and initiates the test. Software automatically returns a result within 90 min. The report details the presence of staphylococci, speci"cally identi"es the 12 Staph. species deemed most relevant, and indicates status of the drug resistance gene mecA.

AB

DC

A. Detection chip B. Ampli"cation chamber C. Sample input D. Blister packs with reagents

Assay Overview

Bacterial DNA is Extracted by cell lysis, then Ampli!ed via Helicase Dependent Ampli"ca-tion (HDA). HDA represents an isothermal alternative to PCR in which strand separation is ac-complished by a helicase rather than by heat denaturation.

After ampli"cation for 30 min at 65°C, Detection occurs: ampli"ed DNA binds to sequence-speci"c capture probes. After washing, an anti-biotin antibody conjugated to Horse Radish Peroxidase (HRP) produces a visual signal via precipitation of a tetramethylbenzidine cleav-age product onto the silicon surface.

Visual ReadoutSignal DevelopmentHybridizationCapture

Biotin labelHRP

TMB

1 Extract DNA

2 Amplify

3 Detect