A L- JAN 9 97 ~EDT 619677 · 2020. 1. 21. · Eberline RO-3B "Cutiepie" R03 BetaIGamma radiation detector, max range 5rad The HPWJS contained the fol 1 owing skid mounted components

A

JAN 9 97 Page 1 ot L-

~ E D T 619677

2. To: (Receiving Organization)

5. Proj./Prog./Dept./Div.:

SNF K-Basin P r o j e c t s

SNF/Debris Removal c\

101 DacumsntiDrawing No.

3. Frm: (Or ig ina t ing Organization)

6. Design Authority/ Design AgentlCog.

SNF K-Basin P r o j e c t s

J.B. C r y s t a l Engr.:

WHC-SD-SNF-OTR- 003

Approval Dssipnator IF1 ~ a a s o n tor Tranrminal IGI

E. S. (1, 0 or NlA 1. Approval 4. Review bee WHC-CM-3-5. 2. Rslsaas 5. Post-Review Ssc.12.71 3. Information 6. Diat. IRecsipt Acknow. Required)

DATA - IC)

Sheet NO.

Disposition (HI & IO 1. Approved 4. Reviewed noicomment 2. Approved wlcomment 5. Reviewed wicomment 3. Disapproved wicomrnsnt 6. Receipt acknowledged

A1 1

-

0

-

IEl litlo or Description at Data Transmitted

O p e r a b i l i t y Test Report f o r t h e K East Basin C a n i s t e r Cleaning System

YCY

7. Purchase Order No.:

9 . Equip./Conponent No.:

10. System/Bldg./Facil i ty:

105-KE Basin 12. Major Assm. Dug. No.:

ESQ

IJI Name I

~~

Signature of EDT Date Caonizanf Manaoar

BD-7400-172-2 (05 /96) tEF097

BD-7400-172-1

. h < WHC-SD-SNF-OTR-003 Rev. 0

Operability Test Report for the K East Basin Canister Cleaning System

Jeremy B. Crystal Westinghouse Hanford Company, Rich1 and, WA 99352 U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-B;FRt)8938 qb

EDT/ECN: 619677 UC: 510 Org Code: 2T240 Charge Code: LO137 B&R Code: EW3135040 Total Pages: H S O C S I @ l l 9 / 9 7 \

Key Words: K Basins, Debris Removal, Debris, OTR, Canister

Abstract: This document summarizes test data compilted duringthe operability test procedure for the K East Basin Canister Cleaning System. successfully lowered the dose of each canister tested so that each canister could be disposed o f as low level waste.

CY/@ ' l q / r ' '

Test Results show that the canister cleaning system

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER. Reference herein t o any s p e c i f i c cannercial product, process, or service by trade n-, trademark, manufacturer, or otheruise, does not necessari ly c o n s t i t u t e or imply i t s endorsemnt, recornnerdation, or favoring by the United States C o v e r m n t or any agency thereof or i t s con t rac tors or subcontractors.

Pr in ted i n the United States of America. To ob ta in copies of t h i s docunent, contact: UHC/BCS D o c M n t Control Services, P.O. Box 1970, Mailstop H6-08, Rich la rd UA 99352, Phone ( 5 0 9 ) 372-2420; Fax (509 ) 376-4989.

11 9/41 Release Stamp I Date

9. lLi0 h Regase Approval

Approved for Public Release

A-6400-073 ( 1 0 / 9 5 ) GEF321

WHC-SD-SNF-OTR-003 Rev. 0

OPERABILITY TEST REPORT FOR THE

K EAST BASIN CANISTER CLEANING SYSTEM


ABSTRACT

The o b j e c t i v e o f t h i s document i s t o summarize t e s t data compiled du r ing O p e r a b i l i t y Test Procedure For t h e K East Basin Canis ter Cleaning System. Th is was performed a t K East Basin i n accordance w i t h WHC-SD-SNF-DTP-003, O p e r a b i l i t y Test Procedure K East Basin Canis ter Cleaning System. The purpose o f t h e t e s t was t o determine i f t h e c a n i s t e r c lean ing system would success fu l l y decontaminate c a n i s t e r s o f var ious types so they could be removed and staged f o r d isposal as low l e v e l waste. c a n i s t e r c lean ing system success fu l l y lowered t h e dose o f each c a n i s t e r t e s t e d so t h a t t h e can is te rs cou ld be disposed o f as l ow- leve l waste. t h e t e s t demonstrated t h a t t h e Canis ter Cleaning System met t h e c r i t e r i a as i d e n t i f i e d i n t h e O p e r a b i l i t y Test Procedure K East Basin Canis ter Cleaning System, WHC-SD-SNF-OTP-003. both were resolved a l l ow ing successful completion o f t h e t e s t .

Test r e s u l t s show t h a t t h e

Furthermore,

Although two t e s t descr ipencies were experienced,

i


TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 .O INTRODUCTION

2.0 TEST COMPONENTS . . . . . . 2 . 1 Equipment . . . . . . 2.2 Accessories . . . . . 2.3 Supplies . . . .

3 . 0 TEST METHOD . . . 3 . 1 C r i t e r i a . . . 3 . 2 Test Process .

4 . 0 TEST RESULTS , . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 . 1 Measurements . . . . . . . . . . .

4 .1 .1 Underwater Measurements . . 4 . 1 . 2 I n A i r Measurements . . . .

4 . 2 D i screpanci es , , , . . . . . . 4 . 3 Recommendations . .

5 . 0 CONCLUSION . . . . . . .

6 . 0 DISPOSITION OF TEST ITEM

7 . 0 REFERENCES . . . ,

Appendix A: Fuel Storage Canis ter Orawi ng

Appendix B: Log A c t i v i t i e s

Appendix C: OTP V a l i d a t i o n

. . 1

. . 1

. . 2

. . 2

3 3 3

9

9

11

. A-1

. B - 1

c -1

ii


L I S T OF TABLES

TABLE 1- Dose Rate Summaries . . . . . . . . .

TABLE 2 - Dose Survey In Low Background . . .

. . 5

. . 7

i i i


1.0 INTRODUCTION

The O p e r a b i l i t y Test Procedure (OTP) was conducted by K East Basin p r o j e c t engineer ing, vendor techn ica l rep resen ta t i ves , and K Basins operat ions (4/4/96-4/9/96) . See Appendix A f o r d e t a i l e d l ogs and suppor t ing data. t e s t was witnessed and v a l i d a t e d by K Bas1 ns q u a l i t y assurance/qual i t y c o n t r o l (QA/QC) personnel and K Basins h e a l t h phys ics techn ic ians (HPT).

The

2.0 TEST COMPONENTS

2.1 Equipment

Equipment used du r ing t h e t e s t inc luded t h e f o l l o w i n g :

0

0

0

HEPA f i 1 t e r e d Canis ter C1 eani ng F i x t u r e Assembly, Drawing no. H-1-81455 Greenhouse Assembly, R o l l e r Conveyor Table, DWG no. H-1-50436 s h t 1&2 Accuseal Bag Sealer , model no. 60-734 Can is te r T rans fe r Car t R07 Underwater/Waterproof Gamma Rad ia t i on Dectector Probe and meter T r i Nuclear Vacuum System, model UFV-260: w i t h Accessories and Hoses Four Underwater L i g h t s Underwater Camera and Moni tor High Pressure Water J e t System (HPWJS), see below f o r d e s c r i p t i o n Eber l i ne RO-3B "Cu t iep ie " R03 BetaIGamma r a d i a t i o n d e t e c t o r , max range 5rad

The HPWJS conta ined t h e f o l 1 owing s k i d mounted components :

Bu t te rwor th T375H. Model 615 ES Pump, 15,000 P S I @ 15 GPM Rel iance E l e c t r i c Motor, Model P44G00, 150 HP. 460V. 170A. 3

Suct ion Surge Tank, Galvanized 33 ga l w i t h s tand, 0-160 p s i g S ta in less Steel F i l t e r Assembly, 10 micron, 42 GPM Discharge Pressure Contro l Vessel, r a t e d 15000 p s i

phase, 60Hz

1


Contac to r /S ta r te r . NEMA enc losure. 3R/4 k ATL S t a r t e r w i t h stand & condu i t , f u l l vo l tage , reduced vo l tage, low amperage draw, slow s t a r t March Feed Pump. M/N TE-7.5K MD - 2 HP. 460V. 2.6A. 3 phase motor

2.2 Accessories

The f o l l o w i n g accessories were u t i l i z e d i n var ious combinations t o d i r e c t and c o n t r o l t h e water f l o w from t h e HPWJS Skid:

High pressure hose '/2 i n . I D , 20,000 p s i working pressure, 60,000 p s i b u r s t pressure, p r o t e c t i v e ou te r cover . 9/16 Autoclave Medium Pressure f i t t i n g s Hand he ld Wand w i t h 10 f t . shie lded hose and s l i m l i n e f i t t i n g quick d isconnect , 9/16 MP (15.000 p s i ) Autoclave Medium Pressure f i t t i n g s , DWG no. H-1-82086

man i fo ld , p i p i n g . f i t t i n g s mounted on a work s tand, DWG no. H - l - 82087

Three Foot Contro l Valves 15.000 p s i ( shu t o f f s t y l e ) w i t h

Sk id S ta in less Steel D r i p Pan Feed and d r a i n hoses A i r mani f o l d and hoses

2.3 Supplies

Suppl ies t h a t were used du r ing t h e t e s t inc luded:

6 m i l F l a t p l a s t i c s leev ing , 48 i n . d i a x 50 f t . long ( t h r e e

Shi pp i ng con ta ine rs I n d e l i b l e marker

Cy l i nde r o f N i t rogen (s to red ou ts ide o f bas in on l y )

r o l l s )

2


3.0 TEST METHOD

3 .1 C r i t e r i a

The O p e r a b i l i t y Test had t h e f o l l o w i n g requirements:

Clean t h e su r face of a t l e a s t t e n ( l 0 ) c a n i s t e r s t o below category t h r e e ( 3 ) . Low Level Waste by reducing t h e dose r a t e t o l e s s than 100mrem/hr a t contact o u t o f water and l e s s than 20mrem/hr a t one meter Demonstrate a c o n t r o l l e d process f o r t h e cleaning/decontamination o f c a n i s t e r s underwater w i t h minimal water su r face d is turbance thereby ma in ta in ing a i r q u a l i t y w i t h i n t h e bas in l i m i t s Perform t h e s tep-by-step opera t i ng procedures t o accomplish OTP demonstrat ing t h e e f f e c t i v e combinations o f f i x t u r e nozzles and associated removal equipment No leaks on t h e HPWJS and hoses du r ing t h e OTP eva lua t i on Va l i da te t h a t r o u t i n e ( p r e r e q u i s i t e ) f a c i l i t y systems remain opera t i ona l du r ing t h e OTP Hand he ld wand and HPWJ s k i d s h a l l ma in ta in a pressure o f 12000 p s i ( v i s u a l a t pump) and w i l l n o t leak

3 . 2 Test Process

Underwater and i n - a i r background dose r a t e measurements were taken i n t h e v i c i n i t y o f t h e c a n i s t e r c lean ing system and greenhouse by t h e HPT and recorded. Canis ters were r e t r i e v e d from var ious l o c a t i o n s i n t h e bas in and t r a n s f e r r e d t o t h e c lean ing s t a t i o n c a n i s t e r ho lde r . Fuel s torage can is te rs o f t ype MKO, M K I , and MKII were used f o r t e s t i n g . Canis ter ca tegor ies a r e shown i n Appendix A . F i v e can is te rs o f each ma te r ia l t ype , s t a i n l e s s s t e e l and aluminum were cleaned. A t l e a s t one o f t h e can is te rs were open bottom s t y l e . A d d i t i o n a l l y , a f i nned s t y l e c a n i s t e r was cleaned f o r i n fo rma t ion purposes o n l y .

Once t h e c a n i s t e r was pos i t i oned f o r c lean ing . a p re -c lean ing underwater measurement o f t h e dose r a t e w i t h both c y l i n d e r s o f t h e c a n i s t e r were taken us ing t h e R07 probe. Each measurement was recorded i n t h e l o g e n t r i e s (See Appendix A: Log E n t r i e s ) . The c a n i s t e r c lean ing system was then used t o c lean t h e i n s i d e and ou ts ide o f t h e c a n i s t e r . A pos t - c lean ing underwater

3

"*. .


measurement o f t h e dose r a t e w i t h i n bo th c y l i n d e r s was recorded and compared t o p re -c lean ing measurements. These measurements a r e shown i n TABLE 1. Dose Rate Summaries.

Cleaning was repeated when necessary u n t i 1 t h e i n -wa te r dose r a t e readings i n s i d e t h e bottom o f bo th c y l i n d e r s i n d i c a t e d l e s s than 100mrem/hr, o r t h e dose cou ld no t be decreased (See t a b l e 1) . I f t h e post c lean ing measurement was l e s s than 100mrem/hr a t con tac t , t h e c a n i s t e r was removed from t h e water i n t o t h e d r i p d r y greenhouse and surveyed. I f c a n i s t e r doses were measured g rea te r than 100mrem/hr. t h e c a n i s t e r was re tu rned t o t h e water t o be recleaned. I f repeated c lean ing d i d no t lower t h e dose count, t h e c a n i s t e r was t o be t r a n s f e r r e d t o a designated s torage area f o r l a t e r process ing, however t h i s was never necessary du r ing t h e OTP. s t e e l can is te rs had t o be s tood u p r i g h t on t h e greenhouse r o l l e r conveyor t o d r a i n t h e t runn ions .

Note t h a t M K I I s t a i n l e s s

Once t h e c a n i s t e r d r i p d r i e d , i t was removed from t h e h o i s t and p laced on a r o l l e r conveyor. Each c a n i s t e r was numbered 1 through 10 w i t h an i n d e l i b l e marker. r e s p e c t i v e l y . An HPT obta ined two smear samples from each c a n i s t e r : (1) center o f t h e r i g h t c y l i n d e r , ex te rna l su r face . ex te rna l sur face. Smear Locat ions.

The r i g h t and l e f t c y l i n d e r s were annotated w i t h “ R ” and “L ”

(2) center o f l e f t c y l i n d e r , The l o c a t i o n s a r e shown f o r c l a r i f i c a t i o n i n FIGURE 1,

Figure 1 - Smear Locations The smear samples were bagged and t r a n s f e r r e d t o 183 K East l a b f o r count ana lys i s and con f i rma t ion o f r a d i o l o g i c a l c h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n as s t i p u l a t e d i n document no. WHC-SD-SNF-TI-019. Charac te r i za t i on o f Empty Fuel Storage Canis ters i n 105KE Basin The c a n i s t e r was then sealed i n a p l a s t i c bag

4


through t h e bag-sealer and p laced i n t o t h e t r a n s f e r c a r t . c a n i s t e r was t r a n s f e r r e d t o c o r r i d o r 7 f o r f i n a l dose measurements. 7 was used because o f t h e low r a d i a t i o n l e v e l s i n t h a t area. The c a n i s t e r dose r a t e s a r e shown i n TABLE 2 .

F i n a l l y , t h e Cor r i do r

4.0 TEST RESULTS

4.1 Measurements

Tables 1 and 2 shows summary o f dose r a t e s measured as descr ibed i n s e c t i o n 3.2.

4 . 1 . 1 Underwater Measurements

I n Table 1, t h e " I n Water Dose Rate Pre-c lean" and "Post -c lean ' ' columns a r e o f t h e format l e f t c y l i n d e r l r i g h t c y l i n d e r . gamma dose r a t e s and were taken us ing an R07 underwater probe.

Values i n these columns i n d i c a t e

I n a i r dose r a t e u n i t s ~ ( c w ) and p(ow) a re c losed window and open window dose CP readings r e s p e c t i v e l y . where c losed window i n d i c a t e s t h a t Beta p a r t i c l e s a re f i l t e r e d from t h e t o t a l r a t e , and open window i n d i c a t e s r a t e s t h a t i n c l u d e bo th Beta and Gamma p a r t i c l e s . t h e h o t t e s t spot on a c a n i s t e r . a f t e r t h e c a n i s t e r was heat sealed i n a bag and p laced i n t h e t r a n s f e r c a r t .

Data i n t h e I n A i r Dose Rate column i n d i c a t e Measurements f o r t h i s column were taken

TABLE 1- Dose Rate Summaries

M K I I S S t

MKO A1

I n Water Dose Rates I n A i r No. O f I Dose I Cleanin I L(mR)/R(mR) L(mR)/R(mR)

100/75 23/16 11/60 1

1000/920 27/49 7/50 1

68/105 13/18 45/255 1

5

,


y(cw) = Gamma dose, c losed window CP p(ow)= Beta and Gamma dose r a t e , open window CP 41 = Almunimum j S t = S ta in less Steel

Uote: a l l doses a r e on con tac t readings.

Note, t h a t except f o r one c a n i s t e r , c a n i s t e r no. 6 , t h e des i red l i m i t f o r a maximum con tac t i n - a i r dose (100 mR) was achieved as i n d i c a t e d i n t h e system c r i t e r i a . resolved on t e s t discrepency no. 1. see s e c t i o n 4 . 2 f o r d e t a i l s . Canis ter 8 i n water dose r a t e was a l s o h i g h , (350/33 ) a f t e r one c leaning. Th is was co r rec ted by rec lean ing t h e MKII SST c a n i s t e r two a d d i t i o n a l t imes. Once w i t h t h e f i x t u r e , and once us ing t h e hand wand. Using t h e f i x t u r e d i d no t improve t h e dose count : however, c lean ing was more e f f e c t i v e w i t h t h e hand wand. The f i n a l in-water-dose r a t e a f t e r t h e add t iona l c leanings was 17/17.

The r e s o l u t i o n f o r t h e h igh dose on c a n i s t e r 6 was recorded and

6


11

4 . 1 . 2 I n A i r Measurements

MKO A1 15/27 5/14 ( F i n I S l o t )

TABLE 2 shows t h e dose counts f rom t h e s i d e o f each c a n i s t e r i n a low dose a rea . As was t h e case i n TABLE 1 values y(cw) and p(ow) a r e c losed window and open window dose readings r e s p e c t i v e l y .

TABLE 2 - Dose Survey I n Low Background

I 10 I M K I I SST I 213 I 2 .512.6 I

From t h i s d a t a , i t can be seen t h a t most o f t h e dose count readings shown i n TABLE 1 one a r e due t o background r a d i a t i o n . The background dose was measured t o be 4mRem. c y l i n d e r s , whereas t h e i n - a i r dose r a t e s i n TABLE 1 were t h e h o t t e s t spot on t h e c a n i s t e r s , t y p i c a l l y t h e bot toms.

Note, t h e dose r a t e s i n t a b l e 2 a r e on t h e s ides o f t h e

7


4.2 Discrepancies

There were two t e s t d iscrepencies du r ing t h e t e s t i n g phase. A t e s t descrepancy was de f i ned as a s tep i n t h e o p e r a b i l i t y t e s t t h a t f a i l e d t o meet t h e t e s t c r i t e r i a . The t e s t c r i t e r i a i s i d e n t i f i e d i n t h e OTP and summarized i n sec t i on 3.1.

The f i r s t discrepency occured a t 10:30pm. 4/5/96 when c a n i s t e r #6 had a ho t spot on i t s bottom measuring 120mR on con tac t . Th is was no t d iscovered u n t i l a f t e r a bag had been sealed around t h e c a n i s t e r . A f t e r consu l t i ng w i t h t h e HPT t h i s was deemed acceptable s ince t h e average c a n i s t e r dose was 10-20mR, and t h e 120mR o n l y c o n t r i b u t e d 2mR a t l f t . t o t h e background dose. Furthermore, t h e r e was no v i o l a t i o n o f t h e RWP which al lowed lOOmR whole body dose.

The second discrepancy occured a t 9:00pm, 4/9/96 when t h e h igh pressure water j e t pump pressure dropped t o 10,OOOpsi. The i n n e r nozzles being used were s p e c i f i e d a t 12,OOOpsi. as w e l l as t h e s p e c i f i e d 12,OOOpsi. The system achieved t h e same clean-ing e f fec t i veness and success fu l l y decontaminated c a n i s t e r s below t h e 100mR/hr 1 i m i t : however, t h e i nner c lean ing nozzles were rep1 aced t o r e s t o r e t h e pressure t o t h e proper ope ra t i ng pressure s p e c i f i c a t i o n .

The t e s t discrepancy l o g and t e s t discrepancy forms a re at tached i n Appendix B .

The HPWJS cont inued t o decontaminate c a n i s t e r s j u s t

4.3 Recommendations

To reso lve f u t u r e occurences where a c a n i s t e r dose measures above t h e acceptable maximum l i m i t , s i m i l a r c a n i s t e r s should be examined more thoroughly f o r dose w h i l e i n t h e Green House where i t i s eas ie r t o r e t u r n t h e c a n i s t e r t o t h e bas in f o r a d d i t i o n a l c leaning.

The opera t i ng pressure should be mod i f i ed t o a l l o w pressure drops on t h e HPWJ t o 10,OOOpsi o r u n t i l c l ean ing e f fec t i veness i s l o s t . I f t h e pressure drops below t h e s p e c i f i e d pressure, changing t h e nozzles w i l l c o r r e c t t h e problem.

It should be a l s o be noted t h a t t h e heat sea le r was no t always making a complete, o r s a t i s f a c t o r y seal around t h e bag edge. ad justed a t t h e s t a r t up t o produce s a t i s f a c t o r y sea ls .

Heating t ime had t o be The opera t i ng

8


procedure should be co r rec ted t o i n s t r u c t operat ions t o make severa l seals t o warm up t h e bag s e a l e r . and t o always check t h e bag edges t o i nsu re a proper s e a l . Several mod i f i ca t i ons t o t h e system should be considered f o r g rea te r e f f i c i e n c y and a sa fe r o p e r a b i l i t y :

The h o i s t handle f o r t h e h o i s t i n s i d e t h e greenhouse needs t o be c u t back so operators do no t i n j u r e t h e i r heads.

P resen t l y t h e greenhouse pendant i n t e r f e r e s w i t h t h e a b i l i t y t o r a i s e a can. The pendant should be p u l l e d ou t f u r t h e r t o c o r r e c t t h i s inconvenience.

The c a n i s t e r t r a n s f e r c a r t needs a neoprene pad on t h e bottom t o avo id damaging t h e c a n i s t e r du r ing t r a n s p o r t . A t h i c k e r bag (10 m i l ) w i l l a l s o a i d i n avoid ing t e a r s .

A work t a b l e , o r c a r t f o r s tag ing supp l i es i s needed near t h e c lean ing area.

The r o l l e r conveyor needs t o be r i n s e d every s h i f t so t h a t smear sample counts w i l l n o t be a f f e c t e d by prev ious c a n i s t e r runs and t o c o n t r o l b u i l d up o f contaminat ion.

5.0 CONCLUSION

Although t h e r e a r e adjustments t h a t must be made t o t h e c lean ing process, t h e requirment t o c lean . s e a l , and s t o r e t e n c a n i s t e r s from t h e bas in was met. A l l r e s u l t s c l e a r l y show t h a t t h e c a n i s t e r c lean ing system w i l l decontaminate can is te rs i n t h e KE Basin such t h a t t h e con tac t dose r a t e i s l e s s than 100mrem. A l l c r i t e r i a descr ibed i n sec t i on 3 .1 were met and v a l i d a t e d as evidenced i n WHC-SD-SNF-OTP-003, O p e r a b i l i t y Test Procedure K East Basin Canis ter Cleaning System. Copies o f t h e s ignatures used t o v a l i d a t e t h e OTP have been prov ided f o r re ference i n t h i s r e p o r t and can be found i n Appendix L .

6.0 DISPOSITION OF TEST ITEM

Since t h e Canis ter Cleaning System O p e r a b i l i t y Test was successfu l , a l l

9


components discussed i n t h e r e p o r t may remain i n t h e Basin u n t i l approximately 5600 can is te rs have been removed from t h e water p o o l , and s to red f o r l a t e r s tag ing . February i n t h e year 2000. U n t i l a l l c a n i s t e r s a r e cleaned t h e HPWJ. greenhouse, pumps, e t c . should remain i n t h e bas in f o r con t inua l use.

It i s est imated t h a t t h i s process w i l l n o t be f i n i s h e d u n t i l

10


7.0 REFERENCES

WHC-SD-SNF-OTP-003. O p e r a b i l i t y Test Procedure K East Basin Can is te r Cleaning System.

Dwg. H-1-81455, Canis ter c lean ing F i x t u r e Assembly and F a b r i c a t i o n Sections and D e t a i l s .

Dwg. H-1-50436. Canis ter Cleaning Dr ip-Dry Greenhouse

Dwg. H-1-82086, Hand Held Wand.

Dwg. H-1-82087. Foot Con t ro l , A i r c o n t r o l , Operat ion S t a t i o n

WHC-SO-SNF-TI-019 Rev.0. 105-KE Basin.

Charac te r i za t i on of Empty Fuel Storage Canis ters i n

11


Appendix A: Fuel Storage Can is te r Drawing

A- 1

? N

MARK 0 CANISTERS MARK I CANISTERS (H -2 -36935) (H-2 -42795)

MARK II CANISTERS (H -2 -46215)

P

0

105-N REACTOR FUEL STORAGE CANISTERS ( FBIWO~A)


Appendix B : Log A c t i v i t i e s

B - l

WHC-SD-SNF-OTR-003 D

TEST DATA SHEET

ed By P ro jec t Technical Representative:

PTR DATE

BACKGRWND DOSE RATE ON UORK TABLE

BACKGROUND DOSE RATE I N AIR ABOVE UATER

' Dose r a t e reading&% "on contact" readings.

WHC-SD-SNF-OTR-003 r Q v 0

‘ 7 2 7

8-3

WHC-SD-SNF-OTR-003 (zw 0

ACCEPTANCE SHEET

The following items have been demonstrated successfully for acceptance of this OTP:

L& Validate that routine facility systems are operational during the OTP.

D" Clean the surface of ten (10) canisters below Category 111, Low Level Waste. Reduce the dose rate to less than 100 mrem/hr at contact in air and less than 20 mrem/hr at one meter.

~~ ~

Minimal water surface disturbance, maintaining air quality within the basin limits.

Maintain a minimum of 12,000 psi at the HPWJS Skid during cleaning.

Verify the step-by-step operations procedures used to accomplish operability testinq.

[J/

d

d' Maintain no leaks on the high pressure water system and hoses during the test evaluation.

~~ ~~

Acceptance is endorsed by the following organizations and personnel:

The Operability Test Procedure for the HPWJS Canister Cleaning Fixture and associated tools and equipment has been satisfactorily completed.

Signatures Date

Test Engineer: 6/// /VJ

/p ///9/% ' LA* /9L r Plant Engineer:

Radiological Controls:V&H f f l d

"" . .

WHC-SD-SNF-OTR-003 VAJ 0

Test Discrepancy Log

8-5

WHC-SD-SNF-OTR-003 @J

Instructions

Enter time, date and OTP test section(s). Enter discrepancy number obtained from the test discrepancy log. Enter description and disposition/justification of discrepancy. Obtain applicable approval signatures as described below. Imp1 ement the disposition. Test Engineer sign and date the ”completed” block when disposition has been implemented.

Disposition Approval Signatures

Manager: Only if disposition does not meet original intent of the OTP or if discrepancy form is being used to change the OTP instructions. Test Director: A l l discrepancies not completed within 8 hours. Test Engineer: A l l discrepancies. Safety: instructions.

For’dispositions that change safety related OTP test

1. 2. 3 . 4 . 5. 6.

A.

B. C. D.

Test Discrepancy Report Form

8-6

WHC-SO-SNF-OTR-003 0

Instructions

1. Enter time, date and OTP test section(s). 2. Enter discrepancy number obtained from the test discrepancy log. 3. Enter description and dispositionljustification o f discrepancy. 4. Obtain applicable approval signatures as described below. 5. Implement the disposition. 6. Test Engineer sign and date the "completed" block when disposition has

been implemented.

Disposition Approval Signatures

A. Manager: Only if disposition does not meet original intent o f the OTP or

B. Test Director: All discrepancies not completed within 8 hours. C. Test Engineer: All discrepancies. 0. Safety: For'dispositions that change safety related OTP test

if discrepancy form is being used to change the OTP instructions.

instructions.

WHC-SD-SNF-OTR-003 v e u 0

CraftlResource Type Total Hours CrafriRerource Type I Total Hours

I I I I I ’ I I I I

BO-6000-351 1011921 E-9 “I. .

WHC-SD-SNF-OTR-003 W d '' I Document V u m b o

CRAFTlRESOURCE USAGE LOG A N D MAINTENANCE RECORD I L I k I - 1 9 l b l - l O l olalsl6llL6~

I

I

I I I I 8D-6000-351 101 92' 6-10

WHC-SD-SNF-OTR-003 fW ’

WHC-SD-SNF-OTR-003 f S v ‘2

1. Documen1 Number CRAFTlRESOURCE USAGE LOG A N D MAINTENANCE RECORD 11 I!€-lCf.161-1216101 I I / L A

J-5

Turnover. Problem Description. Action Taken

ccecrhpyr &f w+ rrlss

T a m Hours CranIReraurce Type ia ta i Hours CrattlResource Type

I

L I I I BD 6000 351 101192 B-12

7 . ‘

WHC-SD-SNF-OTR-003 T.Y u 0

i i

6-13

WHC-SO-SNF-OTR-003 Y W 0

CraftlResourcc Type Total Hours CrahIRcsource Type Total Hours

CRAFT/RESOURCE USAGE LOG A N D MAINTENANCE RECORD ' 5

Turnover. Problem Dcrcript#an. Action Taken

I Document Numbel

L i I Kl - 14 I 61 - 1 0 IO 12 181 Oi / 101 ~

I I I . - .

I I

WHC-SD-SNF-OTR-003

WHC-SD-SNF-OTR-003 W V 0

CRAFT/RESOURCE USAGE LOG A N D M A I N T E N A N C E RECORD J-5

I Dosumen? Number

m - r3&J - 101n I 2 1 glo I 1101

E I l I 1 i r r I

i ! I i I i i


Appendix C: OTP Val ida t ion

c-l

WHC-SD-SNF-OTR-003 (4 0

Operabi 1 i t y Test Procedure K 'East .Basi n Canister C1 eani ng System

Jeremy B. Crystal Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland. WA 99352 U.S. Department o f Energy Contract DE-AC06-87RL10930

EDT/ECN: 140396 UC: 510 Org Code: 2G000 Charge Code: LD054 B&R Code: EW3135040 Total Pages: -i?2-W CLf 3\'15'

Key Words:

Abstract: This document provides the guidance necessary t o corn l e t e the operability testing of the High Pressure Water Je t System instayled in KE Basin. Satisfactory test results will .enable the equipment t o be used i n support of the Debris Removal Project.

OTP, Canister, Debris, K East

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER. se rv i ce by t rade name, trademark. manufacturer, or otherwise. does no t necessar l ly rnnct i t i i te or imolv i t s endorsement. recommendation. o r favor ing by the United States

Reference herein t o any s p e c i f i c commercial product, process, o r

-- .- - . - - - - - Government o r a n i agency thereof o r i t s contractors o r subcontractors.

P r in ted i n t h e United States o f America. To obtain copies o f t h i s document, contact: WHC/BCS Document Control Services, P.O. Box 1970. Mai lstop H6-08. Richland WA 99352. Phone (509) 372-2420: Fax (509) 376-4989.

MAR 5 19%

* \9 e ease

3/51 96 ' Date

LXL4G.9 h&-- Rel'dse Approval

Approved for Pub1 i c Re1 ease A-6400-073 (10/95) GEF321 c-2

WHC-SD-SNF-OTR-003 Ye v

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 . 0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. 1.1 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.2 Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.3 Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.1 Test Director (Operations PIC) 2.2 Test Engineer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3 Project Technical Representative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.4 Test Performers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.5 Quality Assurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.0 PREREQUISITES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.1 Completion of Supporting Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2 Operating Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.3 Safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.4 Special Tools, Equipment. and Supplies 3.5 Qualifications/Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.0 TEST CONTROL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1 Test Discrepancies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2 Test Changes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.3 Test Log' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.0 PROCEDURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1 Design Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.2 System Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.3 Test Process 5.4 Pre-Test Inspection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.5 Test Procedure Steps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

APPENDIXA . . . 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . APPENDIX B

APPENDIX C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . APPENDIX D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . APPENDIXE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1 1 1 1

1 1 2 2 3 3

3 3 3 3 4

. 5

5 5 6 7

7 7 7

9 9

A- 1

B-1

c- 1 D-1

E-1

a

c-3

WHC-SO-SNF-OTR-003 r e U

Butterworth i s a registered trademark of Butterworth.

March i s registered trademark of March Manufacturing, Inc.

c - 4

WHC-SD-SNF-OTR-003 f P Y

OPERABILITY TEST PROCEDURE FOR THE

K EAST BASIN CANISTER CLEANING SYSTEM

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 BACKGROUND

The operability testing shall demonstrate the capability of the High Pressure Water Jet System (HPWJS) to. reduce contamination levels and dose rate on empty fuel canisters prior to removal from the basin and subsequent packaging for disposal.

The HPWJS and the Clean, Remove and Package Empty Canisters Operating Procedures (CC) will be utilized in support of the step-by-step instructions for functionally testing the performance of the specified equipmentlsystem. Facility modifications were completed via the Engineering Change Notice (ECN) process for Electrical Services, I X M Discharge Header, and Grating/Handrail to support and provide a workstation for installation of HPWJS skid and canister cleaning equipment.

The full fuel storage canisters located under the workstation have been moved and relocated to a new area in the basin to provide room for the underwater work table. The basin floor area under the workstation has been vacuumed to remove sludge. The CC equipment has been installed at the workstation located in the center bay of the basin. installed in the rail/truck bay.

The HPWJS skid has been

1.2 PURPOSE

This operability test' provides the instructions t o demonstrate a combined canister 'cleaning system functionality.

1.3 SCOPE

. The overall scope of the Operability Test Procedure (OTP) is to demonstrate the operability of the Canister Cleaning System installed in the 105 K East Basin on the Hanford Site. WHC-SC-SNF-TC-004, Development Test Procedure-High -Pressure Water Jet System.

The system Vas developed and tested per

2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES

2.1 TEST DIRECTOR (OPERATIONS PIC)

The Test Director is responsible for the following:

c-5

WHC-SD-SNF-OTR-003 f W o

- Functioning as the Person In Charge (PIC) for performance as delineated in this procedure.

8 Control1 ing testing activities.

. Assigning responsibilities. 1

.

. Monitoring testing for compliance with the test procedures.

Ensuring Hanford Job Hazards Analysis check1 ist is complete.

Conducting prejob briefing/readiness review prior to initiating test and at the beginning of each shift.

The Test Director for this activity is:

2.2 TEST ENGINEER

The Test Engineer is responsible for the following:

9 Providing project engineering support during testing activities. - Preparing test report. 9 Providing liaison with the Test Director, Cognizant Engineer,

Safety, QA, Environmental, and Project Technical Representative for the sign off of the OTP in Appendix C, as required.

Reviewing test results.

= Ensuring all items requiring operational testing per this procedure are tested.

The Test Engineer for this activity is: Gysfal

2.3 PROJECT TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE

The Project Technical Representative(s) (PTR) is responsible for the fol1 owing:

. Overall technical coordination and direction of the special fixtures and equipment including interfacing with equipment vendors.

. Ensuring proper equipment set up, safe operation, and trouble shooting of th,e system as required.

9 Performing a safety walk down of the system prior to the test and record completion of the walk down on the Test Data Sheet, Appendix A .

C-6

WHC-SD-SNF-OTR-003 YQ v *

2.4 TEST PERFORMERS

Test Performers are responsible for performing test activities in accordance with this procedure.

2 . 5 QUALITY ASSURANCE

Witnessing by quality assurance/quality control (QA/qC) personnel may be required for the validated test results and shall be indicated by sign offs on Appendix A, Test Data Sheets.

3.0 PREREQUISITES

3.1 COMPLETION OF SUPPORTING ACTIVITIES

The following activities must be complete prior to beginning this procedure:

1. 2. Field.work completed on 1K-95-846. ' 3 . 4 . 5. 6.

Field work completed on 1K-95-845.

Field work completed on IK-95-847. Field work completed on 1K-95-848. Field work completed on 1K-95-849. Field work completed on lK-96-00006/W.

3 .2 OPERATING PROCEDURES

The following procedures will be utilized for operating equipment during

1. HPWJS Operating Procedure, OP 07-101 2. Clean, Remove and Package Empty Canisters Procedure, OP 07-103 3 . Tri-Nuc Operating Procedure, OP 07-104

implementation of this OTP, therefore, must be available:

3 . 3 SAFETY

Note: Call 911 in the event of an injury. Inform Emergency Response personnel of cause of injury. To ensure notification for high pressure water injury, operations personnel shall possess a card that is easily accessible and that outlines possible nature of the injury. shall be available at the Shift Manager's office.

These cards

3.3.1 Report to PIC any unsafe operations and any possible pinch points.

C-7

WHC-SD-SNF-OTR-003 0

3.3.2 At the beginning of each shift, conduct a prejob safety meeting to discuss Radiation Work Permit (RWP), Job Hazard Analysis (JHA), other permits/limits, and the work anticipated during the shift.

Comply with applicable RWPs and approved Radiation Area Entry Permit . 3.3.3

3.3.4 A JHA form will be required in accordance with WHC-CM-1-10, WKS 6; Pre Job Safety Planning. Existing JHAs may be appl i cab1 e .

3.3.5 Applicable -JHAs and Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS's) shall be located in the facility test area.

3.4 SPECIAL TOOLS, EQUIPMENT, AND SUPPLIES

3.4.1 Equipment - Canister Cleaning Fixture Assembly, Drawing No. H-1-81455 =

= Canister Transfer Cart 9

= Tri Nuclear Vacuum System with Accessories and Hoses . Underwater Lights (four each) 1 Underwater Camera and Monitor -

Greenhouse Assembly and Roller Conveyer Table Bag Sealer

R07 underwater/waterproof Radiation Detector Probe and Meter

HEPA Filter/Blower Unit with Hose

The HPWJS contains the following skid mounted components:

- Butterworth T375H, Model 615 ES Pump, 15,000 PSI @ 15 G.P.M. = Electric Motor, Model P44GOO - Reliance Electric, 150 HP, 460 - Suction Surge Tank. (Galvanized, 33 gal with stand, 0-160

Stainless Steel Filter Assembly. (10 Micron, 42 g.p.m.). Discharge Pressure Control Vessel. (rated 15,000 psi).

= Contactor/Starter - NEMA enclosure, 3R/4 Ji ATL Starter with stand & conduit, full voltage, reduced voltage, low amperage draw, slow start. March Feed Pump, M/N TE-7.5K MD, 2 $P/460V/3PH Motor-2.6 running amps.

Volts, 170 Amps, 3 Phase, 60 Hz.

wig).

- 3.4.2 Accessories

The following accessories may be utilized in various combinations to direct and control the water flow from the HPWJS Skid: - High pressure hose .50 in. ID, 20,000 psi working pressure,

60,000 psi burst pressure, protective outer cover, 9/16 Autoclave Medium Pressure Fittings.

C-8

WHC-SD-SNF-OTR-003 'Q "

- Hand Held Wand with 10 ft. shielded hose and Slimline Fitting Quick disconnect, 9/16 MP (15,000 psi) Autoclave Medium Pressure Fittings.

= Three Foot Control Valves 15,000 psi. (shut off style) with manifold, piping, fittings mounted on a. work stand.

9 Skid Stainless Steel Drip Pan.

Feed and Drain Hoses.

Air Manifold and Hoses.

3.4.3 Supplies

Cylinder of Nitrogen (to be stored outside of basin only) - Flat Plastic Tubing (48 inches x 50 feet, three rolls). = Shipping Containers. 1 Indelible marker.

3.5 QUALIFICATIONS/TRAINING

3.5.1 The operators shall have completed training for the operation of the HPWJS, Canister Cleaning Fixture, and associated tooling prior to the start of this OTP.

3.5.2 Personnel performing these tests shall be trained and qualified by the HPWJS vendor representative or a vendor certified person for the safe start up, operation, and shutdown o f the HPWJS.

Training records will be maintained by the K Basins Training organization located in M0442.

3.5.3

4.0 TEST CONTROL

The OTP is normally performed in the order written. (successful or not) of each major section must be signed by the Test Engineer and a test log (Appendix E) entry must be made. Director, some procedure sections may be performed out of order.

Completion

At the discretion of the Test

Test procedure administrative or editorial changes required during testing may be accommodated as exceptions in the released test report if the changes cannot affect operating facility safety, function or performance and will not compromise test data (WHC-CM-6-1, EP-4.2 Section 2.5).

4 . 1 TEST DISCREPANCIES

Test steps that fail t o meet the testing criteria are dispositioned per the instructions listed below,

c-9

WHC-SD-SNF-OTR-003 0

NOTE: It should be noted that completing a test discrepancy form is the preferred method of changing the test procedure instructions. case, the instructions in Section 4.2 apply.

In this

1. Record the discrepancy in the discrepancy log (Appendix D) . A discrepancy that halts the performance of the OTP or otherwise adversely affects the performance schedule will be immediately reported to the Test Engineer.

the discrepancy as is, or postpone correction to a later date. Record decision for disposition in the space provided on the discrepancy form (Appendix D). the original intent of the OTP step unless authorized and documented on the Test Discrepancy Form.

Record justification for disposition in the space provided.

Obtain necessary signatures to postpone correction or accept condition as is. Corrections performed immediately (within the same shift) do not require approval signatures.

5. Obvious typographical or other clerical errors may be corrected immediately without completing a discrepancy sheet by simply crossing out and initialing by the Test Engineer.

2. Determine whether to immediately correct the discrepancy, accept

A discrepancy correction must meet

3 .

4 .

4.2 TEST CHANGES

Changes to test instructions may be performed in the field by following

1.

these instructions.

Test instructions may be changed using the test discrepancy method or by using the ECN method. preferred due to the ease of implementing the change in the field. It should be noted that the field copy of the OTP (including all discrepancy reports) will be released as an Operational Test Report (DTR); therefore, issuance of an ECN against the original OTP would duplicate the effort involved in releasing the OTR.

The tes t discrepancy method is

2. See Appendix D for the test discrepancy form and specific instructions related to the form. --

3 . Obtain all required signatures as specified in WHC-CM-6-1, Standard Engineering Practices, Section EP-2.2, "Change Control ." Minimum requirements are specified in Appendix D, Test Discrepancy Form.

Obvious typographical or other clerical errors may be corrected immediately without completing a discrepancy sheet by simply crossing out and initialing by the Test Engineer.

4.'

c-10

WHC-SD-SNF-OTR-003 v o

4.3 TEST LOG

A test log (Appendix E) will be maintained by the Test Engineer. The test log will be a running narrative of test activities and status.

5.0 PROCEDURE

5 . 1 DESIGN CRITERIA

The following design criteria were considered and included in the design

- ALARA, engineered into the process. - =

= . Ease of maintenance, replacement of degraded nozzles. =

during the development phase:

Minimize handling of items to be cleaned/decontaminated. Minimize the moving parts of the special support equipment and water

Ease of operation by the operators.

Minimize cleaning time for each canister.

jet fixture heads.

5.2 SYSTEM CRITERIA

The cleaning fixture and/or water pressure may require adjustment if acceptance is not reached during the first test. Tests may be performed as many times as necessary to reach the expected results. The following items shall be demonstrated successfully for acceptance of this OTP:

* Clean the surface of at least ten (10) canisters below Category 111, Low Level Waste by reducing the dose rate to less than 100 mrem/hr at contact out of water and less than 20 mrem/hr at one meter.

Demonstrate a controlled process for the cleaning/decontamination of canisters underwater with minimal water surface disturbance thereby maintaining air quality within the basin limits.

maintaining a minimum of 12,000 psi at the HPWJS skid during the process.

Perform the step-by-step operating procedures to accomplish OTP demonstrating the effective combinations of fixture nozzles and associated removal equipment.

- 1 . Perform the OTP for cleaning/decontamination of canisters,

=

. - No leaks on the HPWJS and hoses during the OTP eva!uation. Validate that routine (prerequisite) facility systems remain operational during the OTP.

pump) and not leak. Hand held wand shall maintain a pressure of 12000 psi (visual at

c-11 I

WHC-SD-SNF-OTR-003 V 0

In o r d e r t o c lean f inned c a n i s t e r s thoroughly, i t may be necessary t o

Successfu l completion o f t h e OTP and acceptance of t h e equipment wi l l be

use the hand wand i n conjunct ion with t h e nozzle c leaning cycle .

documented i n Appendix C , Acceptance Sheet.

5.3 TEST PROCESS

Underwater and i n - a i r dose r a t e measurements wi l l be taken by t h e Health Physics Technicians (HPT) and recorded i n Appendix A . Canis te rs w i l l be r e t r i e v e d from various l o c a t i o n s i n the basin and t r a n s f e r r e d t o t h e work s t a t i o n t a b l e c a n i s t e r holder . dose r a t e w i t h i n b o t h cy l inders of t h e c a n i s t e r w i l l be a t ta ined and recorded. The c l e a n i n g f i x t u r e wi l l be manipulated t o c lean i n s i d e and outs ide of t h e c a n i s t e r . A pos t c leaning underwater measurement of t h e dose r a t e within b o t h c y l i n d e r s w i l l be recorded and compared t o pre-cleaning measurements. These readings w i l l provide t h e decontamination f a c t o r (DF). Cleaning may be repea ted a s necessary u n t i l t h e in-water dose r a t e reading ins ide t h e bottom of both c y l i n d e r s a re reading l e s s t h a n 100 mrem/hr o r no decrease i n dose r a t e i s r e a l i z e d . I f t h e post c leaning measurement i s l e s s than 100 mrem/hr a t c o n t a c t t h e c a n i s t e r wi l l be removed from t h e water i n t o t h e Drip Dry Greenhouse and surveyed a s t h e c a n i s t e r breaks t h e water surface. measurement i s g r e a t e r than 100 mrem/hr a t contac t , r e t u r n t o water f o r r e c l e a n i n g . the Tes t Data Sheet . des igna ted s t o r a g e area f o r 1 a t e r processing.

A pre-cleaning underwater measurement of t h e

I f c a n i s t e r

I f t h e hand held wand i s u t i l i z e d , no te under comments s e c t i o n on I f repeated cleaning i s not successfu l , t r a n s f e r t o a

NOTE: Mark 11 S t a i n l e s s S tee l c a n i s t e r w i l l requi re s tanding upr ight t o d r a i n t h e t runnions.

The fol lowing type c a n i s t e r s may be used f o r t h e acceptance t e s t : Mark 0 , Mark I , and Mark I1 fue l s torage c a n i s t e r s . Five c a n i s t e r s of each m a t e r i a l t y p e , s t a i n l e s s s t e e l and aluminum, wi l l be cleaned. A t l e a s t one o f t h e c a n i s t e r s w i l l be an open bottom s t y l e and one wi l l be a f inned s t y l e f o r information only.

Once t h e c a n i s t e r has d r i p dr ied (no v i s i b l e water ) , i t wi l l be removed from the h o i s t and placed on the r o l l e r conveyor. numbered 1 through 10, with an i n d e l i b l e marker, and the r i g h t and l e f t c y l i n d e r s annotated with "R" and " L , " r e s p e c t i v e l y . The HPT wi l l ob ta in two smear samples from each c a n i s t e r ; (1) c e n t e r of tha r i g h t cy l inder , ex te rna l s u r f a c e , and ( 2 ) cen ter of t h e l e f t cy l inder , ex te rna l surface. t h e HPT w i l l perform a r a d i a t i o n survey of each c a n i s t e r e x t e r i o r s u r f a c e . Dose r a t e readings of each c y l i n d e r c e n t e r ( i n t h e v i c i n i t y of t h e smear sample l o c a t i o n s ) wi l l be recorded i n Appendix B. t r a n s f e r r e d t o the 183 K East l a b f o r count ing ana lys i s . Analyt ical d a t a obta ined from t h e 183 K East l a b w i l l be summarized under separa te r e p o r t .

Each c a n i s t e r w i l l be

Addi t iona l ly

Smears wi l l be bagged and

The c a n i s t e r i s then bagged o u t through t h e bag-sealer i n t o a p l a s t i c bag and p laced i n t o t h e t r a n s f e r c a r t . o f the 10 c a n i s t e r s .

The above process i s repeated f o r each

c-12

WHC-SO-SNF-OTR-003 f'QU 0

The transfer cart will hold four bagged canisters. When fhe cart i s full it will be moved to the packaging area for unloading where the canisters will be placed into a shipping container.

5.4 PRE-TEST INSPECTION

5.4.1 The PIC, Test Engineer, and PTR shall perform a system walk down

All equipment and tools are properly installed.

prior to start of test t o ensure:

9

Feed water from the I X M discharge header is connected and valve IXMV-229 is in full OPEN position.

High pressure hose connections are verified and there are no visible leaks.

Drain hoses are properly routed and flat plastic is installed at the grating and extends to the water surface.

Verify that all safety shields and guards are installed.

Verify that operating procedure steps are implemented and hold points.have been signed off.

5 . 4 . 2 A satisfactory walk-through shall be documented by the PTR in Appendix A.

5.5 TEST PROCEDURE STEPS

These steps may be repeated and/or rearranged at the direction of the Test Engineer/PIC/PTR as necessary to complete the cleaning o f at least 10 canisters.

5.5.1 Take a background dose rate in air above water where canister base of greenhouse and record in Appendix A.

=L 1 ,4.,-fd / H p T J DATE

5.5.2 Place underwater radiation detector at the canister holder, se rate and record in Appendix A.

1 63-76 DATE

5.5.3

5.5.4

Start the Tri Nuclear Vacuum System per the operating procedure,

Start the HPWJS per the operating procedure (OP 07-101). Then use the steps in the Clean, Remove and Package Empty Canisters Procedure (OP 07-103) for cleaning the canisters

OP 07-104.

C-13

WHC-SD-SNF-OTR-003 .e.vo

5 .5 .5 Verify that water pressure is set to a minimum of 1-2,OOO psi and sign off in Appendix A.

5 . 5 . 6 Position and manipulate the water jet fixture through one full cleaning cycle for both inside and outside of canister using the

Clean, Remove and Package Empty Canisters Procedure (OP 07-103) completing step-by-step. In addition, the following details were added to procedure steps:

5'. 5 . 6 . 1 The pre-cleaning survey performed in Section 4 . 2 of OP-07-103, shall be recorded in Appendix A. Similarly, the post cleaning survey in step 14 o f Section 4.3 shall be recorded in Appendix A.

NOTE: Before removing the canister from the water, the dose rate should be less than 100 mrem/hr at contact. If not, reclean until 400 mrem/hr at contact and record number after each cleaning on data sheet. If after several cleanings the dose rate is still >lo0 mremlhr, contact the P I C before transferring canister to the designated storage area. The PIC will record dose rates and maintain an inventory of the rejected canisters.

5 .5 .6 .2 Following Section 4 . 4 , Step 6, of OP-07-103, perform smear surveys and radiation surveys as described in Section 5.3 of this procedure.

5 . 5 . 7 Repeat Sect.ions 4.2 through 4 . 6 in OP-07-103 as necessary for each of the 10 canisters.

5 .5 .8 Shut down HPWJS and Tri-Nuclear pump per operating procedure(s).

C- 14

2.0 TEST COMPONENTS2.1 Equipment2.2 Accessories2.3 Supplies

3.0 TEST METHOD3.1 Criteria3.2 Test Process

5.0 CONCLUSION6.0 DISPOSITION OF TEST ITEM7.0 REFERENCES1 0 INTRODUCTION1.1 Background1.2 Purpose1.3 Scope2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES2.1 Test Director (Operations PIC)2.2 Test Engineer2.3 Project Technical Representative2.4 Test Performers2.5 Quality Assurance

3.0 PREREQUISITES3.1 Completion of Supporting Activities3.2 Operating Procedures3.3 Safety3.4 Special Tools Equipment and Supplies3.5 Qualifications/Training

4.0 TEST CONTROL4.1 Test Discrepancies4.2 Test Changes4.3 Test Log'

5.0 PROCEDURE5.1 Design Criteria5.2 System Criteria5.4 Pre-Test Inspection5.5 Test Procedure Steps

Documents

A L- JAN 9 97 ~EDT 619677 · 2020. 1. 21. · Eberline RO-3B "Cutiepie" R03 BetaIGamma radiation detector, max range 5rad The HPWJS contained the fol 1 owing skid mounted components