Upload
rolf-t-wigand
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Reporrs
Telecommunications shall ensure
that the approval procedure is
simple as regards the administra-
tive requirements, the time re-
quired for tests and the costs.
Structural impact on the DBP
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
The sovereign tasks shall be sepa-
rated from the entrepreneurial
tasks as far as organization is
concerned.
The Federal Ministry of Posts and
Telecommunications shall per-
form the sovereign tasks as an
independent ministry.
The Federal Minister of Posts and
Telecommunications shall super-
vise the performance of the en-
trepreneurial tasks.
Telekom’s budget/economic plan
shall be subject to approval by the
Federal Minister of Posts and
Telecommunications in consulta-
tion with the Federal Minister of
Finance.
Posts and telecommunications
shall be separate as far as orga-
nization is concerned.
To promote the development of
telecommunications, the sub-
sidies paid by Telekom to the
postal sector shall be reduced step
by step over a period of five
years. In any case they shall be
recorded separately in Telekom’s
budget.
The telecommunications sector of
the Deutsche Bundespost shall
remain a public enterprise and its
funds part of the special funds of
the Federation.
The official relationship of the
members of the Board of Mana-
gers of the enterprise to the Fed-
eration shall be governed by pub-
lic law. This shall also apply to the
second management level.
The network, the monopoly ser-
vices, the regulated and unreg-
ulated services and the terminal
equipment area shall be managed
as separate divisions of Telekom
with separate budgets/economic
plans and separate annual
accounts. Any cross-subsidies
shall be identifiable as such.
From the point of view of orga-
nization and accounting, the divi-
40. Telekom may set up subsidiaries
under private law for the provi-
sion of unregulated services and
for any complementary business
activities to be able to compete on
the market without the con-
straints of the public budget and
service law. Joint ventures of
Telekom and private enterprises
should also be considered.
After the change-over from the
levy payable to the Federation to
value added tax. Telekom shall
be liable to pay all other taxes like
any other corporation.
Concerning the appropriation of
profits, the application of com-
pany law is considered conve-
nient.
15
46
41. Private law shall apply to the legal
relations between Telekom and
its customers.
42. To prevent competition distor-
tions, Telekom should be made
liable to pay value added tax
instead of the levy payable to the
Federation. Initially, this
arrangement shall at least be ap-
plied to the regulated and unreg-
ulated services provided in com-
petition with others and to the
terminal equipment area. After
an adequate transition period. it
47
Pension reserves shall only be set
up for pension obligations en-
tered into after I January 1987.
The regulation concerning the
maximum number of staff posi-
tions, the incentive systems, the
payment of bonuses for particu-
larly difficult work and the finan-
cial conditions applicable to the
recruitment of staff shall be made
more flexible and more closely
related to performance.
The budgeting of personnel costs
for the different divisions and
decentralized organizational units
will give Telekom greater flexibil-
ity in the deployment of staff.
Eberhard Witte Universitat Miinchen
lnstitut fiir Organisation Munich, West Germany
A comment on the Witte Report
sions responsible for unregulated
services and terminal equipment
shall be treated in a way effective-
ly preventing the transfer of
monopoly profits to the divisions
exposed to competition. An au-
diting company shall determine
and certify every year whether or
not this requirement has been
met.
43
4-l
shall also be applied to monopoly
services.
The West German government’s
Commission on Telecommunications
met for two years and submitted on 16
September 1987 its 161-page final
report’ to the Chancellor Helmut
Kohl. In the German press the report
is often referred to as the Witte- Bericht- the Witte Report - after the
Commission’s chairman, Professor
Eberhard Witte. The Commission
worked independently to develop its
assessments and recommendations.
The report was supported by the
Commission members by nine votes to
two, with one abstention.
As Professor Witte’s article indi-
cates, the report lists 40 recommenda-
tions. Among the major items addres-
sed are: separating the telephone-
related operations from the Deutsche
Bundespost; taking additional initia-
tives in prying loose the Bundespost’s
literal monopoly on customer premis-
es equipment; and making possible
the connection between the public
network and private leased-line net-
works.
The report states that:
This will have far-reaching consequences for the whole telecommunications sector and for the competitiveness of the Federal Republic. Everything points to a dramatic increase in the importance of telecoms for the entire economy.
In addition, the drafters are ‘con-
vinced that only the replacement of
the monopoly with competition at all
levels can lead to a market capable of
withstanding the future’.
The meaning of this report can
186 TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY June 1988
probably be best understood in the
context of similar telecommunications
restructuring efforts of other indus-
trialized nations. In February 1988 the
Commission for the European Com-
munities accelerated by as much as
three years key portions of its plan to
open Europe’s telecommunications
market to competition. There is some
speculation that such a market-
opening effort could spread easily also
beyond the 12 EC member nations,
including more than 25 European
nations. These efforts can be seen as
the EC’s first steps in its campaign to
open Europe’s heavily regulated tele-
communications markets to greater
competition. The Commission is plan-
ning to stick to a strict timetable for
the implementation of its proposals.
There will be full liberalization of the
equipment market (telephones. office
switchboards, computer modems and
most other terminal equipment that
connects to phone lines) by 3 1 Decem-
ber 1990, with a transition period for
the first telephone handsets. A prog-
ressive liberalization of the service
market, except for voice telephony
services will start in 1989. Full liber-
alization of receive-only satellite dis-
hes will be achieved by 1989.
In addition, the Commission is in-
sisting that tariffs be closely related to
costs. If this is not achieved by 1992,
the EC will review the situation. A
number of additional provisions
covering fair processes for equipment
approval throughout Europe, the
creation of the European Telecom-
munications Standards Institute (or
ETSI) in April 1988. and agreement
on the principles of open network
provisions (addressing access to leased
lines and eventually ISDN) are also
included. The Commission also re-
leased a directive aimed at opening
telecommunications administrations’
public procurement in March 1988.
Currently, all European countries
limit private sales of some ot these
products, giving the national tele-
phone companies a monopoly or near
monopoly in some segments of the $21
bn European communcations equip
ment market. However, this measure
by the Commission leaves the remain-
der of Europe’s $110 bn market for
telecommunications services and
equipment under strict government
control. Even in the terminal equip-
ment segment at which the order aims.
a thicket of varying technical stan-
dards, import restrictions and other
regulations will continue impeding
competition in most European coun-
tries. One may view this effort as a first
shot in what is likely to be a noisy.
five-year campaign by the Commis-
sion to allow more competition in
Europe’s long-regulated phone mar-
kets. It will take stabs at liberalizing
broad segments of the phone market.
including computer-communications
services. telex, satellite services, as
well as sales of switches, cables and
other gear from which the ‘phone
network is built.
Myth
One Should note also the generally
perceived myth that US deregulation
has caused an invasion of the US
market by European telecommunica-
tions products, with no equivalent
opening of the major European mar-
kets to the USA. The statistics,
however, do not support this position.
While the EC nations are net expor-
ters of telecommunications equipment
with a total surplus of $1.2 bn in 1986,
shipments to the USA totalled merely
$368 m and exports to Japan only $39
m. The EC, however, has imported
telecommunications equipment from
the USA to a total value of $988 m and
from Japan to $724 m.
Even PTT monopolies - with their
unwilling support of their govern-
ments - are not immune to competi-
tive forces. As the world is continuing
to shrink electronically due to over-
expanding networks and electronic
messaging, as business is increasingly
globalized and as international tele-
communications traffic increases
much faster than domestic traffic,
PlTs that do not address and are
unresponsive to user needs have suf-
fered and may continue to suffer
significant competitive inroads into
their revenue growth. West Germany
may serve as a case in point. Looking
at the telex rate structure in the 1970s
telex rates in West Germany and in
some other European countries were
TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY June 1988
very expensive in comparison with
some other European countries. For
example, sending a telex message
from West Germany to the UK for
forwarding to Hong Kong was con-
siderably less expensive than sending
the same telex directly from West
Germany to Hong Kong. Consequent-
ly, an entirely new business service
(telex refiling, a form of arbitrage)
was created to take advantage of this
situation. In the long run, however.
European PITS found it necessary to
lower telex prices quickly for long-
distance messages, which in turn
brought telex pricing back in line with
underlying costs for providing this
service.
A newly published survey’ of tele-
phone charges in Western nations
rates West Germany as the most
expensive nation surveyed overall, in-
cluding domestic long distance calls.
When analysing cost trends in Ger-
many over seveal years, it becomes
apparent that this nation has remained
stable and expensive. The USA scored
among the cheapest in all categories
(local, long distance, international
telephone, including telex). Belgium
has dropped its position in 1987 as
Europe’s most expensive country
overall. British Telecommunications
PLc’s local telephone rates have con-
tinued to be the highest of all major
Western countries over a period of
four years. France reduced local call
charges while most other countries
either froze or increased them.
Domestic long-distance calls in France
also fell by 23.3%. France is now also
the cheapest country for international
call charges due to an impressive
41.7% drop in the cost of international
telephone calls. Changes in value-
added tax laws in France imply that
consumers can now reclaim some of
their telephone costs.
There are some signs that the ultra-
monopolistic Deutsche Bundespost is
to some degree opening the West
German telecommunications market.
The USA and the EC have been
pressuring for more access to the
German market, the third largest in
the world after the USA and Japan.
Fairly recently the West German gov-
ernment has given MCI International
Inc of Rye Brook, New York, the
187
opportunity to establish an indepen-
dent gateway for telecommunications
services to and from the USA in
competition with AT&T’s internation-
al services. A future, additional gate-
way operator. US Sprint International
Inc of Kansas City, Missouri, is said to
be favoured by the Germans.
Similarly, US trade negotiators and
the Commission for the European
Communities pried loose another fin-
ger in the grip of the Deutsche Bun-
despost in 1986 when the Bundespost
agreed to end its monopoly on the
provision of modems connected to the
public network. Only after the first
terminal is connected can private firms
provide extensions. Under this ruling
the Bundespost now allows stand-
alone modems and those incorporated
into terminals to be supplied directly
by private suppliers. One should note
that Commission spokesmen stated
that, prior to this ruling, users of the
public telephone network could not
always obtain the type of modem best
suited to their needs, and only the
market for modems to be used in
private networks was open. One might
view such an event as a merely symbo-
lic effort of the Bundespost, but it was
one of several pointing to an opening
of the German market.
Reviewing discussions, opinions
and reactions of the Witte Report in
the German press does not suggest in
any way major chances for significant
change in West Germany’s telecom-
munications market. One can prob-
ably expect something of an increase
in competition, but it is not to be
viewed as a major increase. Most
individuals interviewed - especially
those with ties to the German tele-
communications industry - see the
Commission’s report as a conservative
proposal, and many had higher ex-
pectations with regard to the Bundes-
post’s opening for competition.
The powerful Deutsche Post-
gewerkschaft (the Deutsche Budes-
post’s labour union) has already criti-
cized the recommendations, as this
organization views the effort as a
threat to the Budespost’s monopolistic
positon. It is precisely from the quar-
ters of the trade unions that the
strongest objections originate. They
claim that if the recommendations
188
were implemented. IO 000 of the cur-
rent 500 otlo postal and telecom-
munications jobs would be lost. The
Socialist Party opposes the recom-
mendation to separate the highly pro-
fitable telecommunications operation
from the Budespost’s unprofitable tra-
ditional postal services, as the result-
ing post office’s losses would have to
be absorbed by the Finance Ministry,
the postal service would have to be
reduced, or postal rates for services
would have to be greatly increased.
The various political factions in
West Germany most certainly reflect
the entire spectrum of positions possi-
ble in their opinions of the Witte
Report. Free market and procompeti-
tion political factions such as the Free
Democratic Party oppose the recom-
mendations for not going far enough.
At the other end of the spectrum
one encounters politicians from the
influential and highly conservative
state of Bavaria who oppose the Witte
Report for going too far. One must
expect intensive political debate be-
fore Chancellor Kohl’s cabinet will
make a decision on whether to accept
the Commission’s recommendations.
West Germany’s PTT Minister.
Christian Schwarz-Schilling, has
stated on several occassions that priva-
tization of the P’IT is out of the
question. Such a position may be
based on the Deutsche Postgewerk-
schaft’s campaign against selling out
the PTT, and probably also that West
Germany’s constitution would pro-
hibit a turnabout of the existing state
monopoly. It is interesting to note also that as
recently as 1986, high Bundespost
officials stated that there is no real
possibility that the PIT will be split
into separate enterprises for post and
telecommunications. Just such a
separation is now a recommendation
of the Witte Commission.
Commenting on the Witte Report’s
provision that tariffs would be set by
the Minister for Posts and Telecom-
munications in conjunction with the
Economics Ministry. Mr Schwarz-
Schilling said that he wanted to intro-
duce significant cuts in volume tariffs
on lines leased to major customers by
the Bundespost. Such tariffs, howev-
er, are controversial because they
would apply after the leased line had
been used for only 80 hours a month,
making leasing lines roughly four
times more expensive than in the UK.
The Witte Report is presently being
analysed and reviewed by the minis-
tries of post. finance, economics, jus-
tice and the interior. After such
efforts, recommendations will be
made to the cabinet. With subsequent
parliamentary debate, deliberations
may move well into the current year.
Actual restructuring of the Deutsche
Bundespost, if any is to occur, is not
likely until 1989 at the earliest.
Professor Rolf T. Wigand Program in Information Management
Arizona State University Tempe. AZ, USA
‘Eberhard Witte, Neuordung der Telekom- munikation: Bericht der Regierungskom- mission Femmeldewesen, Heidelberg, Germany, 1987. *The International Telecoms Price Survey, National Utility Services. Croydon, UK, and Park Ridge, NJ, USA, 1988.
Conference reports Debating regulation issues
First International Telecommunications Regulations Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 12-13 November 1987
More than 125 senior decisionmakers ternational Telecommunications Reg-
in telecommunications from Europe, ulations Conference, cosponsored by
Japan and the USA met in Amster- the PA Consulting Group and IBC
dam in November 1987 to debate the Technical Services. focused on the
latest regulations issues. The first In- impact of the European Commission
TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY June 1988