50
209 A Brief Introduction 1 Examples are the Correlates of War (CoW) project that was founded in 1963 by a political scientist at the University of Michigan and that has immensely fostered quantitative research into the causes of war (see http://www.corre- latesofwar.org/); the International Conflict Research (ICR) group, based at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zürich (ETHZ) and the Center for Comparative and International Studies (CIS), that conducts research on international and domestic conict and mainly relies on statistics and com- putational methods for its analyses (see http://www.icr.ethz.ch/); or the European Network of Conflict Research (ENCoRe) at ETHZ that aims at pre- paring researchers and policy makers for future conflicts by coordinating and accelerating ‘the construction and maintenance of conflict datasets with the help of an integrated online portal that allows researchers and policy makers to analyze and predict the outbreak and course of conflict processes around the world’ (see http://www.encore.ethz.ch/index, 14.1.2014). The majority of contributions in influential journals such as the Journal of Peace Research and the Journal of Conflict Resolution rely on such quantitative data and analyses. 1 The Emerging Cultural Turn in Peace Research 1 For a comprehensive overview of transitional justice see, for example, Kritz (1995). See also Daly and Sarkin (2007), Kayser-Whande and Schell-Faucon (2008), Merwe (2003), Minow (1998), and Rigby (2001). 2 See Fischer and Ropers (2004: 11), Galtung (2001), and Huyse (2008: 2–3). The problematic nature of the term ‘reconciliation’ and its elements and instruments are discussed by, among others, Bar-Tal and Bennink (2004: 28–29), Bloomfield (2003b, 2006), Huyse (2003b), Lederach (1995, 1997), and Pankhurst (1999). 3 Given the vagueness and unspecificity of the word ‘traditional’ and ‘tradi- tion’, some authors suggest using a different terminology instead, such as ‘community justice’, ‘informal systems’, ‘customary law’, or ‘local justice sys- tems’ (Huyse 2008: 8, Mearns 2002: 8, 11). Since all these terms themselves involve terminological inaccuracies – what, for instance, is ‘a community’ and what is ‘the local’ – I intentionally continue using the term ‘traditional’ and the enduring discourses related to it. In the course of this work, however, I use some of the other terms interchangeably. 4 For more examples where traditional mechanisms have been integrated into broader justice-seeking structures after massive violence in various countries in Africa, see, for example, International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, IDEA (2006), Gibbs (1997: 232), Ocen (2007), and Tom (2006). Notes

A Brief Introduction - Springer978-1-137-50435-7/1.pdf · 209 A Brief Introduction 1 Examples are the Correlates of War (CoW) project that was founded in 1963 by a political scientist

  • Upload
    dotuyen

  • View
    213

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

209

A Brief Introduction

1 Examples are the Correlates of War (CoW) project that was founded in 1963by a political scientist at the University of Michigan and that has immensely fostered quantitative research into the causes of war (see http://www.corre-latesofwar.org/); the International Conflict Research (ICR) group, based atthe Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zürich (ETHZ) and the Centerfor Comparative and International Studies (CIS), that conducts research on international and domestic conflict and mainly relies on statistics and com-putational methods for its analyses (see http://www.icr.ethz.ch/); or the European Network of Conflict Research (ENCoRe) at ETHZ that aims at pre-paring researchers and policy makers for future conflicts by coordinating andaccelerating ‘the construction and maintenance of conflict datasets with thehelp of an integrated online portal that allows researchers and policy makersto analyze and predict the outbreak and course of conflict processes aroundthe world’ (see http://www.encore.ethz.ch/index, 14.1.2014). The majority of contributions in influential journals such as the Journal of Peace Research andthe Journal of Conflict Resolution rely on such quantitative data and analyses.

1 The Emerging Cultural Turn in Peace Research

1 For a comprehensive overview of transitional justice see, for example, Kritz(1995). See also Daly and Sarkin (2007), Kayser-Whande and Schell-Faucon(2008), Merwe (2003), Minow (1998), and Rigby (2001).

2 See Fischer and Ropers (2004: 11), Galtung (2001), and Huyse (2008: 2–3). The problematic nature of the term ‘reconciliation’ and its elements and instruments are discussed by, among others, Bar-Tal and Bennink (2004:28–29), Bloomfield (2003b, 2006), Huyse (2003b), Lederach (1995, 1997), andPankhurst (1999).

3 Given the vagueness and unspecificity of the word ‘traditional’ and ‘tradi-tion’, some authors suggest using a different terminology instead, such as‘community justice’, ‘informal systems’, ‘customary law’, or ‘local justice sys-tems’ (Huyse 2008: 8, Mearns 2002: 8, 11). Since all these terms themselves involve terminological inaccuracies – what, for instance, is ‘a community’ andwhat is ‘the local’ – I intentionally continue using the term ‘traditional’ andthe enduring discourses related to it. In the course of this work, however, I use some of the other terms interchangeably.

4 For more examples where traditional mechanisms have been integrated intobroader justice-seeking structures after massive violence in various countries in Africa, see, for example, International Institute for Democracy and ElectoralAssistance, IDEA (2006), Gibbs (1997: 232), Ocen (2007), and Tom (2006).

Notes

210 Notes

5 For the most salient features of traditional justice systems, see Stevens (2001).Despite these common features, there are also significant socioculturallydetermined differences in how the various mechanisms deal with the past, how they try to restore the victims, and whether or not offenders need to be identified and sanctioned.

6 Various authors have criticized the original terminology and have suggested the use of more neutral terms such as ‘construction’ instead of ‘invention’(Jolly & Thomas 1992: 243, Linnekin 1992: 249). In 1993, Ranger (1993: 82)himself revisited the debate and argued that he would now prefer the term‘imagined’ to ‘invented’ since it lays much more stress upon ideas, images, and symbols – so central to traditions and identity – which ‘invention’ does not.

7 For Northern Uganda, for example, see Baines (2007: 98, 107); for Bougainville, see Boege (2006); for Indonesia, see Clark and Stephens (2011: 1–2).

2 Decentralization, Revitalization, and Reconciliation in Indonesia

1 This is only a brief outline, as a rich literature exists on the history of decen-tralization, the legislation and decentralization process, and revival move-ments throughout Indonesia (see e.g. Aspinall & Fealy 2003, Davidson &Henley 2007, Hadiz 2010, Holtzappel & Ramstedt 2009, Kivimäki, Jacobsen, &Kartasasmita 2002, H. Schulte Nordholt & Klinken 2007).

2 Most national laws and government regulations are by now available on the Indonesian government website (Law Regulations): http://www.indonesia.go.id/en/law-regulations.

3 Rosaldo (2003: 6) rightly criticizes Benedict Anderson’s notion of theIndonesian nation as an imagined community, as he fails to notice that theminorities in the peripheries have not been invited to take part in this imagi-nation process.

4 This is only a very cursory historical introduction to the area. For morein-depth accounts see, for example, Andaya (1993), Chauvel (1990), Fraassen(1972), and Knaap (1987).

5 Due to immigration and conflict dynamics and the difficulties of data surveys under such conditions, there were huge fluctuations in the population statis-tics of Maluku Province over the last years. Whereas in 2000 approximately44% out of a population of 1.2 million were Muslim and 56% Christian, 2003 government statistics claim that approximately 65% were Muslim and 35% Christian out of 1.27 million, and 2008 statistics report 50% were Muslim and 50% Christian out of 1.44 million (Badan Pusat Statistik Propinsi Maluku 2000, 2003, Badan Pusat Statistik Propinsi Maluku & Badan PerencanaanPembangunan Daerah 2010). In Indonesia as a whole, Muslims constitute some 87% of the population.

6 Data provided in the annual provincial government statistics and by the pro-vincial government (Badan Pusat Statistik Propinsi Maluku 2000, 2005/2006,Badan Pusat Statistik Propinsi Maluku & Badan Perencanaan PembangunanDaerah 2010, Pemerintah Provinsi Maluku 2010). See also Pieris (2004).

7 By March 2011, village perdas had only been passed for the districts of CentralMaluku and Ambon City. Only drafts existed for other districts in Maluku

Notes 211

Province (e.g. for Seram Bagian Barat, Seram Bagian Timur, Maluku Tenggara,and Maluku Tenggara Barat) or no efforts had been taken yet to sketch suchregulations. This is in stark contrast to other provinces such as West Sumatra,where the Provincial Regulation on Nagari (village) Government came intoeffect in 2000 and district regulations were finalized in 2001 (F. v. Benda-Beckmann & K. v. Benda-Beckmann 2007b: 226–227).

8 For examples that illustrate that prevailing confusion, the continuous argu-ments over jurisdiction, and the disputes about areas of competence between regional governments and local actors, see Bräuchler (2014b: 71–73).

9 This is a reference to the Saniri Tiga Batang Air, a structure meant to govern the regions of the three rivers Eti, Tala, and Sapalewa in West Seram in thepast, which is also subject to current revival for peace initiatives.

3 Conflict and Peacebuilding in Maluku

1 This outline of the Moluccan conflict is based on parts of chapter 3 in Bräuchler(2013), but has been shortened, updated, and revised. As the background to the conflict and how it took place differed widely from one Moluccan regionto the next (North, Central, and Southeast Maluku), here I will mainly con-centrate on Central Maluku and Ambon City.

2 I am well aware that such a short note cannot do justice to the much broaderphenomenon of war economies. However, its exploration would go beyondthe scope of this book. In her book Shadows of War: Violence, Power, and International Profiteering in the Twenty-First Century (2004), Carolyn Nordstromygoes beyond the local level of war economy and throws light on the interna-tional profiteering going on in the shadows of African wars.

3 Ambon is the name both of the capital city of Maluku (Kota Ambon) and of the island (Pulau Ambon) where the eponymous city is located.

4 The PDS is one level below martial law and places the police directly underthe person commanding the PDS, the then governor of Maluku, SalehLatuconsina.

5 For an overview of the various factors, see Bertrand (2002), Brown, Wilson, and Hadi (2005), Goss (2004). For a list of references, see Bräuchler (2013: 90, fn 25).

6 The reason is that usually an entire village joined a religion. Back in colonialdays, to avoid conflict, villages with populations of mixed religions, such asTial (Pulau Ambon) and Sirisori (Saparua), had been divided into a Christian and a Muslim village respectively, that were then called Tial Serani and TialIslam or Sirisori Kristen and Sirisori Islam (Kraemer 1927: 82).

7 See e.g. Ajawaila (2000b), Bartels (2003), Lee (1997), Manuhutu (2000), Pariela (2005: 187), Pattiselanno (1999), Taylor (2001). On the impact of Muslimimmigration on the Christian–Muslim relations in Ambon, see also Mearns(1999). As part of state-supported transmigration programs between 1969 and1999, 97, 422 people emigrated to Maluku, more than half of them to CentralMaluku. Given a total population of two million, this amounts to almost 5%. The majority came from Buton and Java and was Muslim. There are no figures on spontaneous migration. Estimates range from 50,000 to 200,000 (Regional Office of the Ministry of Transmigration and Forest Settlers Provinceof Moluccas, http://www.websitesrcg.com/ambon/transmig.htm, 22.7.2002

212 Notes

and 13.1.2012). While in 1930 about 60% of the Moluccan population was Christian, prior to the unrest the proportion had fallen to only 40%. In 2008, it had risen again to almost 50% (see also chapter 2, note 5).

8 Provokator is a more commonly used term in the Suharto era to describe thoserwhom the authorities believed to be behind a conflict triggered in a society that is regarded ‘as a pressure cooker in which the pressure of amok, rage andfrustration builds up until it erupts in violence’ (Panggabean 2006: 220).

9 For a critique of the program, see Amirrachman (2012). For an initiative bylocal academics that resulted in a publication on Central Moluccan cultural values to be used in local-content curriculum (muatan lokal), see Putuhena et al. (2009). In 2007, the mayor of Ambon City, Jop Papilaya, asked each adatvillage on Ambon to write down its history. Those documents would then beused in muatan lokal to teach the younger generations their history and their cultural heritage (Pesiwarissa 2007). No reflection took place about what the codification of oral history and culture could imply.

10 For another description of an NGO workshop culture in peacebuilding in Liberia and its positive and negative effects, see Fuest (2010).

11 During the Moluccan conflict (1999–2003/4) the Indonesian presidencychanged three times: J. B. Habibie until October 1999, Abdurrahman Wahiduntil July 2001, and then Megawati Sukarnoputri until October 2004.

12 Lembaga Kebudayaan Daerah Maluku (2010), Muis et al. (2010), Ralahalu (2006, 2007), Widoyoko (2008). The Banda Sail, an annual yacht race thattakes competitors from Darwin, Australia, to the Banda Islands in Maluku, for example, was suspended due to the conflict. In 2010, it was taken up againwith literally dozens of new hotels mushrooming in Ambon City (see also Dinas Kebudayaan dan Pariwisata Provinsi Maluku 2010).

13 Similar to the Maluku case, truth was strategically put aside in the Helsinkipeace process for Aceh, as its crucial task was to put an end to the decades-long hostilities – resulting in the so far successful MoU in 2005. As Aspinall (2008) suggests, the urgency of the case made justice take second place to peace.

14 Latu and patih were terms used for traditional leaders before the introductionof other titles of Malay or Javanese origin.

15 See LAIM’s website http://www.maluku-interfaith.blogspot.com/ (still avail-able in March 2015, but inactive).

16 The regional and local governments also frequently supported such ballgame competitions between villages of different faiths as an incentive to restore interreligious activities.

4 Reconciliation and the Revival of Tradition

1 According to a BakuBae survey in March/April 2002 almost 60% of res-pondents in Maluku believed that the conflict was solved by people from the bottom up (masyarakat dari bawah), 22.6% opted for civil and militaryelites, 4.3% for middle-range groups, and 13.6% for a combination of twoor more options. The survey shows that 79.2% considered measures taken by the government as insufficient or ineffective (Baku Bae Movement 2002:6–7).

Notes 213

2 More generally, it has rarely been truth that determined historical memory inIndonesia due to the decade-long oppressive Suharto regime (Zurbuchen 2005).

3 See also Bartels’ (1977: 30a) impressive sketch of pela relationships on andbetween the islands of Ambon, Lease, and Western Seram.

4 However, I think it is highly problematic to speak of a redefinition of ‘an inter-religious identity of Moluccan brotherhood and sisterhood as syncretically Christian-Muslim’, as Braithwaite et al. do (2010: 192), since no Moluccan would claim to be ‘syncretic’, but rather a good Christian or Muslim, no mat-ter how orthodox she or he is.

5 Ajawaila (2005: 170), Pattikayhatu, Talakua, and Ririhena (1993: 49), Renwarin(1986).

6 In some cases in the eastern part of Central Maluku, however, affiliation is not clear or contested (Ellen 2003).

7 For a detailed reconstruction of the myth, see Jensen (1939).8 The data in this section resulted out of personal communications between

2005 and 2011 with the founding fathers of the BakuBae movement such as Bob Birahy and Ricky Chris Palyama (Hualopu), Abdullah Ely (LEMM), JustusPattipawae (EWSC), Ichsan Malik (ITP), and other members and local NGOsinvolved, who supplied me with their reports – too many to be listed here – and added interesting details and personal experiences.

5 The Reinvention of Traditional Leadership

1 This chapter is based on an article published in a special issue of the Asian Journal of Social Sciences (Bräuchler 2011a) and has been profoundly adapted,restructured, complemented, updated, and embedded into this book.

2 This historical analysis is based on both secondary (e.g. Chauvel 1990, Knaap 1987, Leirissa, Pattikayhatu, & Kartadarmadja 1982/1983) and primary sources, such as the extensive compilation of Dutch colonial documents and corre-spondence edited by Chris van Fraassen and P. Jobse in 1997 and the writingsof people involved in colonial administration, such as Holleman (1923) andvan Hoëvell (1875). For more substantive references, see Bräuchler (2011a).

3 Due to the notoriously conflict-prone succession management of the raja, arti-cle 85 of the famous decree of 1824 (Staatsblad No. 19a) that formalized andinstitutionalized the Moluccan title hierarchy and status symbols outlawedany post-installation debates about the legitimacy of an office holder.

4 According to Cooley (1987: 238) and Bartels (1994: 308), the raja also used tobe the head of the village council before UU No. 5/1979, but, as adat experts tin a variety of Central Moluccan villages affirmed to me, the raja then was notable to make any decisions without the approval of the saniri – in contrast tothe situation after 1979.

5 There were other issues involved as well, but further analysis would go beyondthe scope of this chapter. Members of the raja’s family destroyed the house of the young murderer, who was sentenced to 20 years in prison.

6 Ichsan Malik promotes the partnership between adat and government, rathertthan their separation, and compares the MLM with the Majelis Rakyat Papua(MRP, Papuan People’s Council) (Institut Titian Perdamaian, Forum MalukuBaru, & Banda’s Culture and Heritage Foundation 2006: 51). The members

214 Notes

of the MRP, according to Widjojo et al. (2008: 15), ‘were chosen exclusively from the ranks of indigenous Papuans, from traditional institutions, religiousgroups and women’. For more details, see http://www.mrp.go.id/.

7 As outlined above, the Perda Negeri of Central Maluku (§ 23(b)) complies with national regulations, while subversion takes place rather unofficially at thevillage level.

8 http://latupatimaluku.blogspot.de. The website is updated only very irregu-larly due to financial and personnel issues.

6 Indigenous People, Migrants, and Refugees: A Clash of Individual and Cultural Human Rights

1 To a minor extent, this chapter draws on a formerly published article(Bräuchler 2010c). Case studies used in that article have been updated andexpanded here, put in a comparative and broader perspective, and embedded in further theoretical discourses.

2 This was pointed out to me by Karin Klenke in 2010, based on her ethno-graphic research in 2009.

3 As many migrants had to flee during the Moluccan war, there is a strong over-lap of these categories.

4 See General Explanations (Penjelasan Umum) of UU No. 32/2004, Section I,No. 10 (Desa).

5 Interestingly, adat figures involved in the negotiations referred to a mysterioustbook that they tried to make use of in their reconstruction efforts. As it is pub-lished in a foreign language, they did not want to make this public yet, as they wanted to have the book translated first in order to verify and legitimize the content. As it turned out in a later stage of my field research in the area, they had most probably referred to an ethnographic study by Adolf Ellegard Jensen (1939, 1948), who had visited Seram with an ethnographic expedition of theFrankfurt Frobenius Institute in 1937/38. In an even later stage of my research, I returned to the field with the books, which had still not been translated into Indonesian or the local dialect.

6 Another group notoriously left out of ‘traditional’ conflict regulation areyoung people, which is rather counterproductive in Maluku, as Keebet vonBenda-Beckmann (2004) argues, as they were key actors in the fighting onthe ground.

7 Things are in flux, however. Due to the increasing numbers of migrants in Amahusu (approximately 40% of the village population in 2011), it is no longer possible to isolate them in the former soa burger, as Raja Amahusurpointed out in March 2011. They are integrated into the soa where they live, that is, according to territorial and not genealogical aspects. As land has become rare, they cannot acquire more than use rights (hak pakai). AlthoughAmahusu was one of the few villages that tried to not get involved in the Moluccan conflict, the Butonese people living in Amahusu before the unrestsnonetheless fled and will most probably not return.

8 Interestingly, in the memoirs of the outgoing Assistant Resident van Wijk of Ambon in August 1937, it was mentioned that Muslim Batumerah mainly con-sisted of foreigners (mainly from Hoamoal) and in ‘old times’ (seventeenth cen-tury) has not been considered a separate village (Fraassen 1997b: No. 73, 555).

Notes 215

9 As the secretary of a Butonese organization in Ambon City (KKBSW) told mein 2011, the majority of votes for the raja of Batumerah came from immi-grants, as his father’s lineage also hailed from outside the area.

10 An estimate by Palmer (2004: 89) is 160,000. According to the secretary of the Butonese organization KKBSW in Ambon City in 2011, approximately 70% of them returned to Maluku after a while.

11 As Butonese on Seram and Haruku told me, some of them prefer living onthe margins of Christian villages, with which they maintain good relations.

12 Another problem in seeking an official land certificate is that the governmentcharges a high fee for it, approximately a million Rupiah in 2011.

13 One problem is the unreflected copying of regulations from one district to the other; another problem is insufficient if not a total lack of communica-tion between the various teams employed by the government to do research for and draft the respective district perdas. The Perda was still not finalizedby the end of 2014.

14 The current vice bupati of SBB is a Butonese (2011–2016).15 According to the head of the Butonese dusun (village district) Pakarena,

Kairatu, there were 37 Butonese dusun in SBB in 2011; among them wereButonese whose parents and grandparents had been born in Maluku whereassome were new arrivals.

16 Phillip Winn’s research on the Banda Islands is one of the few existing studieson Butonese people in Maluku. Whereas Butonese living in mixed communi-ties with non-Butonese people on Banda argued that adat primarily belongs tto a certain place and the earth and not to people, taking this as an excuseto give up their traditions and participate in local rituals and ceremonies, enclave Butonese in Banda see adat as a relevant body of practices to be maint -tained in exile (Winn 2008: 96–97).

17 The first pernegs passed in the villages usually focused on what concernedthe respective village most at the moment. In Suli this was the reconstruction of adat governmental structures and the integration of refugees, in Horale tand Rutong on Ambon it was protection of the environment and resourceexploitation to the disadvantage of the masyarakat adat, and in Kariu it was tphysical reconstruction and economic rehabilitation.

18 I do not mean to say that there is one ethnic group in Maluku. There areseveral ethnic groups ‘indigenous’ to Maluku that I here subsume under ‘ethnic Moluccans’.

19 In the Kei Islands (Southeast Maluku), migrants from Banda (Central Maluku)try to provide proof for ancestral kinship and alliance between their ances-tors and local power holders in order to construct a shared history, frame themselves as insiders, and legitimize their access to land on Kei (Kaartinen2009: 61–65). As Timo Kaartinen argues, in certain contexts, these Maluku-internal migrants help to mediate between the ‘indigenous’ population andmigrants from outside Maluku.

7 Concluding Reflections: Toward a New Anthropology of Peace

1 For a very critical review of the UN-initiated statebuilding process in EastTimor, see Chopra (2000).

216 Notes

2 Buckley-Zistel (2006: 150) interprets what she refers to as ‘chosen amnesia’ as ‘the deliberate eclipsing of particular memories, [which] allows people toavoid antagonism and enables a degree of community cohesion necessary forthe intimacy of rural life in [post-genocide] Rwanda’.

3 Central to this approach is the development of methods for aid organizations and external peacebuilders to judge the positive and negative impact of theiractivities in societies that underwent civil war or mass violence. The aim is to identify dividers (local actors widening the gap between the conflict parties) and connectors (those putting emphasis on common ground beyond the expe-rienced violence) and to empower the latter (Anderson 2004).

217

Acciaioli, Greg. 2001. Grounds of Conflict, Idioms of Harmony: Custom, Religion, and Nationalism in Violence Avoidance at the Lindu Plain, Central Sulawesi. Indonesia 72 (October): 81–114.

Adam, Jeroen. 2009. Communal Violence, Forced Migration & Social Change on theIsland of Ambon, Indonesia. [Dissertation, Ghent University, Ghent]

Aditjondro, George Junus. 2000. The Tragedy of Maluku. Lecture and Seminar at the Institute of Aboriginal Studies and Research at Macquire University, Sydney, 2 May 2000 (last update). http://www.infomaluku.net/res/views/000503GA.htm (13.12.2000).

—— 2001. Guns, Pamphlets and Handie-Talkies: How the Military Exploited Local Ethno-religious Tensions in Maluku to Preserve their Political andEconomic Privileges. In I. Wessel and G. Wimhöfer (eds), Violence in Indonesia.Hamburg: Abera-Verlag, 100–128.

Ajawaila, Jacob W. 2000a. Eksistensi Hak Petuanan di Maluku Tengah: Suatu Tinjauan Sosial Budaya. Paper presented at the Workshop “PerlindunganHukum Terhadap Hak-hak Masyarakat Adat Atas Tanah Petuanan Di MalukuTengah”, Saparua, 26–27 April 2000. Yayasan Sala Waku Maluku.

—— 2000b. Orang Ambon dan Perubahan Kebudayaan. Antropologi IndonesiaXXIV (61): 16–25.

—— 2003. Dinamika Kebudayaan Ambon: Sebuah Proses Perubahan. Ambon:Universitas Pattimura.

—— 2004. Orang Ambon Dahulu dan Sekarang (Desa adat dalam tinjauan budaya). Ambon: Universitas Pattimura.

—— 2005. Dinamika Budaya Orang Maluku. In Lembaga Kebudayaan DaerahMaluku (ed.), Maluku Menyambut Masa Depan. Ambon: Lembaga KebudayaanDaerah Maluku, 159–179.

Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara (AMAN). 2010. Country Technical Notes onIndigenous Peoples’ Issues: INDONESIA. http://www.ifad.org/english/indigenous/pub/documents/tnotes/indonesia.pdf (13.8.2012).

Amirrachman, Alpha. 2012. Peace Education in the Moluccas, Indonesia: BetweenGlobal Models and Local Interests. [Dissertation, Amsterdam]. http://dare.uva.nl/document/363593 (14.6.2012).

Andaya, Leonard Y. 1993. The World of Maluku. Eastern Indonesia in the Early Modern Period. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.

Anderson, Mary B. 2004. Experiences with Impact Assessment: Can We Know What Good We Do? Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management. http://www.berghof-handbook.net (6.11.2011).

Anthias, Floya. 2001. New Hybridities, Old Concepts: The Limits of ‘Culture’. Ethnic and Racial Studies 24 (4): 619–641.

Antlöv, Hans. 2003. Not Enough Politics! Power, Participation and the New Democratic Polity in Indonesia. In E. Aspinall and G. Fealy (eds), Local Power

Bibliography

218 Bibliography

and Politics in Indonesia: Decentralisation & Democratisation. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 72–86.

Aragon, Lorraine V. 2001. Communal Violence in Poso, Central Sulawesi: Where People Eat Fish and Fish Eat People. Indonesia 72 (October): 45–79.

Askandar, Kamarulzaman. 2006. The Role of Cultures and Religions in PromotingPeace. Paper presented at the International Workshop of the InternationalCenter for Islam and Pluralism (ICIP) “Promoting Peace: The Role of PeaceCultures and Local Wisdoms”, Jakarta-Depok, 25–27 April 2006.

Aspinall, Edward. 2008. Peace without Justice? The Helsinki Peace Process in Aceh. Geneva: Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue.

Aspinall, Edward & Greg Fealy (eds). 2003. Local Power and Politics in Indonesia:Decentralisation & Democratisation. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Atapary, Samson, Yohanes Balubun, Dominggus Huliselan, Meiske Luhulima & Tenny Latekay. 2006. Laporan Penelitian Pembaharuan Hukum di KepulauanMaluku (Kei Kecil, Halmahera Utara, Haruku, Nusalaut, Ambon, Seram). Ambon:HUMANUM – Jaringan Baileo Maluku & Kelompok Kerja Pembaharuan Hukum Indonesia.

Attaminy, Muhammad, Dwi Hardianto & Misbah. 2002. “Kami Menolak TegasKesepakatan Malino”: Wawancara Drs. Muhammad Attamimy, MAg. Sabili 2(18) March: 62–64.

Avonius, Leena. 2003. Reforming Adat. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology4 (1): 123–142.

—— 2009. Reconciliation and Human Rights in Post-conflict Aceh. In B. Bräuchler(ed.), Reconciling Indonesia: Grassroots Agency for Peace. London/New York: Routledge, 121–137.

Avonius, Leena & Damien Kingsbury (eds). 2008. Human Rights in Asia: AReassessment of the Asian Values Debate. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Avruch, Kevin. 1998a. Culture and Conflict Resolution. Washington, DC: UnitedStates Institute of Peace Press.

—— 1998b. Introduction: Culture and Conflict Resolution. In K. Avruch,P. W. Black and J. A. Scimecca (eds), Conflict Resolution: Cross-Cultural Perspectives.Westport, CT: Praeger, 1–17.

Babo-Soares, Dionisio. 2004. Nahe Biti: The Philosophy and Process of Grassroots Reconciliation (and Justice) in East Timor. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology5 (1) April: 15–33.

Bach, Jan-Michael. 2003. Dezentralisierung und Lokalregierung in Indonesien seit 1998: Der Fall Riau. Studien zur Volkswirtschaft des Vorderen Orients 11. Münster: LIT.

Badan Pusat Statistik Propinsi Maluku. 2000. Maluku Dalam Angka 2000 (Malukuin Figures 2000). Ambon: BPS.

—— 2003. Maluku Dalam Angka 2003 (Maluku in Figures 2003). Ambon: BPS.—— 2005/2006. Maluku Dalam Angka 2005/2006 (Maluku in Figures 2005/2006).

Ambon: BPS.Badan Pusat Statistik Propinsi Maluku & Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan

Daerah. 2010. Maluku Dalam Angka 2010 (Maluku in Figures 2010). Ambon: BPS.Baines, Erin. 2005. Roco Wat I Acoli – Restoring Relations in Acholi-land: Traditional

Approaches to Reintegration and Justice. Liu Institute for Global Issues & Gulu District NGO Forum & Ker Kwaro Acholi.

—— 2007. The Haunting of Alice: Local Approaches to Justice and Reconciliation in Northern Uganda. The International Journal of Transitional Justice 1: 91–114.

Bibliography 219

Baku Bae Movement. 2000. Suara Hati Korban Kerusuhan Maluku. Jakarta.—— 2002. Mayoritas Masyarakat Maluku Mendukung Pendekatan Penyelesaian

Konflik “Dari Bawah” (Jajak Pendapat Masyarakat Maluku, March–April2002).

Baku Bae Movement & Early Warning System Conflict (EWSC). 2007. Informasi Proses dan Hasil Audensi Majelis Latupati Maluku (MLM) dengan Wakil Presiden RI (disampaikan kepada Gubernur Maluku/Perwakilan Rakyat PropinsiMaluku), 27 February 2007, Jakarta.

Bar-Tal, Daniel & Gemma H. Bennink. 2004. The Nature of Reconciliation as an Outcome and as a Process. In Y. Bar-Siman-Tov (ed.), From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 11–38.

Barnard, Alan. 2006. Kalahari Revisionism, Vienna and the ‘Indigenous Peoples’ Debate. Social Anthropology 14 (1): 1–16.y

—— 2012. Widening the Net: Returns to the Field and Regional Understanding.In S. Howell and A. Talle (eds), Returns to the Field: Multitemporal Researchand Contemporary Anthropology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press,230–249.

Bartels, Dieter. 1977. Guarding the Invisible Mountain: Intervillage Alliances, ReligiousSyncretism and Ethnic Identity among Ambonese Christians and Moslems in theMoluccas. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.

—— 1994. In de Schaduw van de Berg Nunusaku: Een Cultuur-historische Verhandeling over de Bevolking van de Midden-Molukken. Utrecht: Landelijk Steunpunt EducatieMolukkers (LSEM).

—— 2003. Your God Is No Longer Mine: Moslem-Christian Fratricide in the Central Moluccas (Indonesia) After a Half-Millennium of Tolerant Co-Existenceand Ethnic Unity. In S. Pannell (ed.), A State of Emergency: Violence, Society and the State in Eastern Indonesia. Darwin: Northern Territory University Press, 128–153, e-version available at http://www.nunusaku.com.

Baumann, Gerd. 1999. The Multicultural Riddle. Rethinking National, Ethnic and Religious Identities. New York/London: Routledge.

Bedner, Adriaan & Stijn van Huis. 2008. The Return of the Native in IndonesianLaw: Indigenous Communities in Indonesian Legislation. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 164 (2/3): 165–193.

Beeck, Christine. 2007. Re-paving the Road to Peace: Analysis of the Implementation of DD&R in Aceh Province, Indonesia. Brief 35. Bonn: Bonn International Centrefor Conversion (BICC).

Benda-Beckmann, Franz von. 1990. Ambonese Adat as Jurisprudence of Insurgency and Oppression. Law & Anthropology. Internationales Jahrbuch für Rechtsanthropologie 5: 25–42.

—— 2009. Human Rights, Cultural Relativism and Legal Pluralism: Towards a Two-Dimensional Debate. In F. v. Benda-Beckmann, K. v. Benda-Beckmann and A. Griffiths (eds), The Power of Law in a Transnational World: Anthropological Enquiries. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books, 115–134.

Benda-Beckmann, Franz von & Keebet von Benda-Beckmann. 1994. Texts inContext: Historical Documents as Political Commodity on Islamic Ambon. InW. Marschall (ed.), Texts from the Islands. Oral and Written Traditions of Indonesia and the Malay World. Ethnologica Bernensia 4/1994. The University of Bern,Institute of Ethnology, 223–244.

—— 2001. Recreating the Nagari: Decentralisation in West Sumatra. Working Paper No. 31, Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology, Halle/Saale.

220 Bibliography

—— 2003. Die Revitalisierung von Tradition im Recht: Rückfall in die Vergangenheit oder zeitgemäße Entwicklung? In Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (ed.), Jahrbuch 2003. München: MPG. e-version.

—— 2007a. Ambivalent Identities: Decentralization and Minangkabau PoliticalCommunities. In H. Schulte Nordholt and G. v. Klinken (eds), Renegotiating Boundaries: Local Politics in Post-Suharto Indonesia. Leiden: KITLV Press, 417–442.

—— 2007b. Between Global Forces and Local Politics: Decentralisation andReorganisation of Village Government in Indonesia. In C. Antons and V. Gessner (eds), Globalisation and Resistance: Law Reform in Asia since the Crisis. Oxford/Portland, OR: Hart, 211–252.

—— 2007c. Social Security Between Past and Future: Introduction. In F. v. Benda-Beckmann and K. v. Benda-Beckmann (eds), Social Security Between Past and Future: Ambonese Networks of Care and Support. Münster: LIT, 1–24.

—— 2008. Transforming Traditions: Myths and Stereotypes about Traditional Law in a Globalizing World. Paper presented at the EASA conference “Experiencing Diversity and Mutuality”, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 26–30 August 2008.

—— 2009. Recentralization and Decentralization in West Sumatra. In C. J. G. Holtzappel and M. Ramstedt (eds), Decentralization and Regional Autonomy inIndonesia: Implementation and Challenges. Singapore/Leiden: ISEAS/IIAS, 293–328.

—— 2010. Unity and Diversity: Multiple Citizenship in Indonesia. In M.-C. Foblets, J.-F. Gaudreault-Desbiens and A. Dundes Renteln (eds), Cultural Diversity and theLaw: State Responses from Around the World. Bruxelles: Bruylant, 889–917.

Benda-Beckmann, Franz von, Keebet von Benda-Beckmann & Bertram Turner.2007. Umstrittene Traditionen in Marokko und Indonesien. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie 132 (Special issue: Die Revitalisierung von Tradition/The Revitalisationof Tradition, edited by Birgit Bräuchler and Thomas Widlok): 15–35.

Benda-Beckmann, Keebet von. 1984. The Broken Stairways to Consensus: VillageJustice and State Courts in Minangkabau. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

—— 2001. Legal Pluralism. Tai Culture VI (1&2, Special issue: Baan-müang:Traditional Law and Values in Tai Societies): 18–40.

—— 2004. Law, Violence and Peace Making on the Island of Ambon. In M.-C.Foblets and T. v. Trotha (eds), Healing the Wounds: Essays on the Reconstruction of Societies After War. Oxford/Portland, OR: Hart, 221–239.

—— 2007. Law, Violence and Peace Making on the Island of Ambon. In F. v. Benda-Beckmann and K. v. Benda-Beckmann (eds), Social Security BetweenPast and Future: Ambonese Networks of Care and Support. Münster: LIT, 281–298.

Benda-Beckmann, Keebet von & Franz von Benda-Beckmann. 2008. TraditionalLaw in a Globalising World: Myths, Stereotypes, and Transforming Traditions. Van Vollenhoven Lecture 2008, Leiden, 16 May 2008. http://media.leidenuniv.nl/legacy/Text%20Van%20Vollenhoven%20Lecture%202008.pdf (17.7.2009).

Bertrand, Jacques. 2002. Legacies of the Authoritarian Past: Religious Violence in Indonesia’s Moluccan Islands. Pacific Affairs 75 (1): 57–85.

—— 2004. Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict in Indonesia. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.

Beversluis, A. J. & A. H. C. Gieben. 1929. Het Gouvernement der Molukken (Meet een voorwoord van den Gouverneur der Molukken L.H.W. van Sandick). Weltevreden: Landsdrukkerij.

Bhabha, Homi K. 1990. Introduction: Narrating the Nation. In H. K. Bhabha (ed.), Nation and Narration. London/New York: Routledge, 1–7.

Bibliography 221

—— 1995. Cultural Diversity and Cultural Differences. In B. Ashcroft, G. Griffithsand H. Tiffin (eds), Cultural Diversity and Cultural Differences (reprint 2001).London/New York: Routledge, 206–209.

Bielefeldt, Heiner & Wilhelm Heitmeyer. 1998. Einleitung: Politisierte Religion inder Moderne. In H. Bielefeldt and W. Heitmeyer (eds), Politisierte Religion.Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 11–33.

Biggar, Nigel. 2003a. Conclusion. In N. Biggar (ed.), Burying the Past: Making Peaceand Doing Justice After Civil Conflict. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 307–324.

—— 2003b. Making Peace or Doing Justice: Must We Choose? In N. Biggar (ed.), Burying the Past: Making Peace and Doing Justice After Civil Conflict. Washington,DC: Georgetown University Press, 3–24.

Bloomfield, David. 2003a. The Context of Reconciliation. In D. Bloomfield, T. Barnes and L. Huyse (eds), Reconciliation After Violent Conflict: A Handbook. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance(IDEA), 40–48.

—— 2003b. Reconciliation: An Introduction. In D. Bloomfield, T. Barnes andL. Huyse (eds), Reconciliation After Violent Conflict: A Handbook. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA), 10–18.

—— 2006. On Good Terms: Clarifying Reconciliation. Berghof Report No. 14.Berlin: Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management.

Boege, Volker. 2006. Traditional Approaches to Conflict Transformation –Potentials and Limits. Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Manage-ment. http://www.berghof-handbook.net (23.3.2007).

Böhm, Kees J. 2002. Kerusuhan di Maluku: Pertengahan Bulan November 2001 Hingga Akhir Bulan Maret 2002. Warta Keuskupan Amboina Tahun XXXII(No. 1) January–April: 15–30.

—— 2005. Brief Chronicle of the Unrest in the Moluccas 1999–2005. Ambon:Crisis Centre Diocese of Amboina.

Bokova, Irina. 2013. The Power of Culture for Development. UNESCO. http://en.unesco.org/post2015/sites/post2015/files/The%20Power%20of%20Culture%20for%20Development.pdf (6.1.2014).

Bonacker, Thorsten & Peter Imbusch. 2005. Zentrale Begriffe der Friedens- und Konfliktforschung: Konflikt, Gewalt, Krieg, Frieden. In P. Imbusch and R. Zoll (eds), Friedens- und Konfliktforschung: Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag fürSozialwissenschaften, 69–144.

Bonta, Bruce. 2007. Peaceful Societies Today – News, Reviews and Clues. Anthro-pology News (October): 13–14.

Bourchier, David. 2007. The Romance of Adat in the Indonesian Political Imagi-nation and the Current Revival. In J. S. Davidson and D. Henley (eds), TheRevival of Tradition in Indonesian Politics: The Deployment of Adat from Colonialism to Indigenism. London/New York: Routledge, 113–129.

Bowen, John R. 1986. On the Political Construction of Tradition: Gotong Royong in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Studies 45 (3) May: 545–561.

—— 2005. Normative Pluralism in Indonesia: Regions, Religions, and Ethnicities. In W. Kymlicka and B. He (eds), Multiculturalism in Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Chapter 7.

Braithwaite, John. 2011. Partial truth and reconciliation in the longue durée. Con-temporary Social Science: Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences 6 (1): 129–146.

222 Bibliography

Braithwaite, John, Valerie Braithwaite, Michael Cookson & Leah Dunn. 2010. Anomie and Violence: Non-truth and Reconciliation in Indonesian Peacebuilding.Canberra: ANU E Press.

Bräuchler, Birgit. 2003. Cyberidentities at War: Religion, Identity, and the Internetin the Moluccan Conflict. Indonesia 75 (April): 123–151.

—— 2004. Islamic Radicalism Online: The Moluccan Mission of the Laskar Jihadin Cyberspace. The Australian Journal of Anthropology 15 (3): 267–285.y

—— 2005. Cyberidentities at War: Der Molukkenkonflikt im Internet. Bielefeld: Transcript.

—— 2006. Constructed Identities Online: The Performance of the Moluccan Crisis on the Internet. In F. Heidemann and A. d. Toro (eds), New Hybridities:Societies and Cultures in Transition. Hildesheim: Olms, 161–177.

—— 2007. Religious Conflicts in Cyberage. Citizenship Studies 11 (4) September:329–347.

—— 2009a. Cultural Solutions to Religious Conflicts? The Revival of Tradition inthe Moluccas, Eastern Indonesia. Asian Journal of Social Sciences 37 (6): 872–891.

—— 2009b. Der Molukkenkonflikt im Internet: Globale Dimension eines lokalenKonflikts. In M. Slama (ed.), Konflikte – Mächte – Identitäten: Beiträge zur Sozial-anthropologie Südostasiens. Wien: ÖAW-Verlag, 87–116.

—— 2009c. Introduction: Reconciling Indonesia. In B. Bräuchler (ed.), Reconciling Indonesia: Grassroots Agency for Peace. London/New York: Routledge, 3–33.

—— 2009d. Mobilising Culture and Tradition for Peace: Reconciliation in the Moluccas. In B. Bräuchler (ed.), Reconciling Indonesia: Grassroots Agency for Peace.London/New York: Routledge, 97–118.

—— (ed.). 2009e. Reconciling Indonesia: Grassroots Agency for Peace. London/NewYork: Routledge.

—— 2010a. Integration and Exclusion: Islam Adat in Central Moluccas. t Indonesiaand the Malay World 38 (110) March: 65–93.d

—— 2010b. Religions Online: Christian and Muslim (re)presentations in the Moluccan Conflict. In S. Schröter (ed.), Christianity in Indonesia. Reihe Southeast Asian Modernities Berlin: LIT, 203–224.

—— 2010c. The Revival Dilemma: Reflections on Human Rights, Self-Determination and Legal Pluralism in Eastern Indonesia. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 62: 1–42.w

—— 2011a. Kings on Stage: Local Leadership in the Post-Suharto Moluccas. Asian Journal of Social Sciences 39 (2, Special issue: Eastern Indonesia under Reform: The Global, the National and the Local, edited by Birgit Bräuchler and MaribethErb): 196–218.

—— 2011b. The Transformation of the Media Scene: From War to Peace in the Moluccas, Eastern Indonesia. In K. Sen and D. T. Hill (eds), Politics and the Mediain 21st Century Indonesia. London: Routledge, 119–140.

—— 2013. Cyberidentities at War: The Moluccan Conflict on the Internet. New York:Berghahn Books.

—— 2014a. Christian-Muslim Relations in Post-Conflict Ambon, Moluccas: Adat, Religion, and Beyond. In B. Platzdasch and J. Saravanamuttu (eds), ReligiousDiversity in Muslim-majority Southeast Asia: Areas of Toleration and Conflict. Singapore: ISEAS, 154–172.

—— 2014b. A Cultural Turn in Peace Research? Decentralization and Reconciliation in Indonesia. [Habilitation thesis, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt]

Bibliography 223

—— 2014c. Modes of Interreligious Coexistence and Civility in Maluku. InV. Gottowik (ed.), Dynamics of Religion in Southeast Asia. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 193–215.

Bräuchler, Birgit & Maribeth Erb. 2011. Introduction – Eastern Indonesia underReform: The Global, the National and the Local. Asian Journal of SocialSciences 39 (2, Special issue: Eastern Indonesia under Reform: The Global,the National and the Local, edited by Birgit Bräuchler and Maribeth Erb):113–130.

Bräuchler, Birgit & Thomas Widlok (eds). 2007. Die Revitalisierung von Tradition/The Revitalisation of Tradition (Special issue of the Zeitschrift für Ethnologie 132).

Bräunlein, Peter J. & Andrea Lauser. 1995. Auf dem Weg zu einer Ethnologiedes Krieges und des Friedens: Hindernisse, Annäherungen. kea (Zeitschrift für Kulturwissenschaft) Sonderband II: Krieg und Frieden. EthnologischePerspektiven: I-XXII. http://www.kea-edition.de/einlei~4.htm (22.1.2009).

Breman, Jan. 1996. The Village on Java and the Early Colonial State. In M. C.Hoadley and C. Gunnarsson (eds), The Village Concept in the Transformation of Rural Southeast Asia. Richmond: Curzon, 3–28.

Brown, Graham, Christopher Wilson & Suprayoga Hadi. 2005. Peace and Development Analysis in Maluku and North Maluku. Overcoming Violent Conflict, Volume 4. Jakarta: CPRU-UNDP.

Bubandt, Nils. 2002. Decentralisation, Conflict, and the New Politics of Traditionin North Maluku. In T. Kivimäki, M. Jacobsen and P. S. Kartasasmita (eds), Democracy, Decentralization, Identity and Conflict in Indonesia. Helsinki/Copenhagen: CTS-Conflict Transformation Service, 114–127.

Buckley-Zistel, Susanne. 2005. “The Truth Heals”? Gacaca Jurisdictions and the Consolidation of Peace in Rwanda. Die Friedens-Warte 80 (1–2): 113–129.

—— 2006. Remembering to Forget: Chosen Amnesia as a Strategy for LocalCoexistence in Post-Genocide Rwanda. Africa 76 (2): 131–150.

—— 2008. Transitional Justice als Weg zu Frieden und Sicherheit: Möglichkeitenund Grenzen. SFB-Governance Working Paper Series Nr. 15, July 2008, Berlin.

Burns, Peter. 2004. The Leiden Legacy: Concepts of Law in Indonesia. Leiden: KITLVPress.

—— 2007. Custom, that is before All Law. In J. S. Davidson and D. Henley (eds),The Revival of Tradition in Indonesian Politics: The Deployment of Adat fromColonialism to Indigenism. London/New York: Routledge, 68–86.

Caldwell, Ian & David Henley (eds). 2008. Stranger-kings in Indonesia and beyond (Special issue of Indonesia and the Malay World 36 (105)).

Certeau, Michel de. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Chauvel, Richard. 1980. Ambon’s Other Half: Some Preliminary Observations onAmbonese Moslem Society and History. Review of Indonesian and MalaysianAffairs 14 (1): 40–80.

—— 1990. Nationalists, Soldiers and Separatists. The Ambonese Islands from Colonialism to Revolt, 1880–1950. Leiden: KITLV Press.

Chopra, Jarat. 2000. The UN’s Kingdom of East Timor. Survival 42 (3): 27–39.Chopra, Jarat & Tanja Hohe. 2004. Participatory Intervention. Global Governance

10: 289–305.Chua, Beng Huat. 2004. Communitarian Politics in Asia. In B. H. Chua (ed.),

Communitarian Politics in Asia. London/New York: Routledge, 1–24.

224 Bibliography

Clark, Samuel & Matthew Stephens. 2011. Reducing Injustice? A Grounded Approach to Strengthening Hybrid Justice Systems: Lessons from Indonesia. Working Paper No. 5, International Development Law Organization (IDLO).http://www.idlo.int/Publications/WP2clarkstephens.pdf (2.11.2011).

Coleman, Simon & Peter Collins. 2006. Introduction: ‘Being … Where?’Performing Fields on Shifting Grounds. In S. Coleman and P. Collins (eds), Locating the Field: Space, Place and Context in Anthropology. Oxford/New York: Berg, 1–21.

Connerton, Paul. 1989. How Societies Remember. Cambridge/New York: CambridgeUniversity Press.

Cooley, Frank L. 1961. Altar and Throne in Central Moluccan Societies: A Study of the Relationship between the Institutions of Religion and the Institutions of Local Society Undergoing Rapid Social Change. [Dissertation, Yale University, New Haven]

—— 1969. Village Government in the Central Moluccas. Indonesia 7 (April):138–163.

—— 1987. Mimbar dan Takhta: Hubungan Lembaga-lembaga Keagamaan dan Pemerintahan di Maluku Tangah. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Cowan, Jane K. 2006. Culture and Rights After Culture and Rights. AmericanAnthropologist 108 (1): 9–24.t

Cowan, Jane K., Marie-Bénédicte Dembour & Richard A. Wilson. 2001a. ClaimingCultural Rights. In J. K. Cowan, M.-B. Dembour and R. A. Wilson (eds), Culture and Rights: Anthropological Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 149–151.

—— (eds). 2001b. Culture and Rights: Anthropological Perspectives. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

—— 2001c. Introduction. In J. K. Cowan, M.-B. Dembour and R. A. Wilson (eds),Culture and Rights: Anthropological Perspectives. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 1–26.

Culbertson, Roberta & Beatrice Pouligny. 2007. Re-imagining Peace After Mass Crime: A Dialogical Exchange between Insider and Outsider Knowledge. In B. Pouligny, S. Chesterman and A. Schnabel (eds), After Mass Crime: Rebuilding States and Communities. Tokyo/New York: United Nations University Press, 271–287.

Dalsgaard, Steffen. 2013. The Field as a Temporal Entity and the Challenges of theContemporary. Social Anthropology 21 (2): 213–225.y

Daly, Erin & Jeremy Sarkin. 2007. Reconciliation in Divided Societies: Finding Common Ground. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Darby, John & Roger Mac Ginty. 2003. Conclusion: Peace Processes, Present and Future. In J. Darby and R. Mac Ginty (eds), Contemporary Peacemaking: Conflict,Violence and Peace Processes. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan,256–274.

Davidson, Jamie S. 2007. Culture and Rights in Ethnic Violence. In J. S. Davidsonand D. Henley (eds), The Revival of Tradition in Indonesian Politics: The Deployment of Adat from Colonialism to Indigenism. London/New York: Routledge, 224–246.

Davidson, Jamie S. & David Henley (eds). 2007. The Revival of Tradition inIndonesian Politics: The Deployment of Adat from Colonialism to Indigenism.London/New York: Routledge.

Davies-Vengoechea, Ximena. 2004. A Positive Concept of Peace. In G. Kemp andD. P. Fry (eds), Keeping the Peace: Conflict Resolution and Peaceful Societies Around the World. New York/London: Routledge, 11–18.

Bibliography 225

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH & Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. 2005. Regional Report Working Group: Southeast Asia. Paperpresented at the International Conference “From Dealing with the Past toFuture Cooperation: Regional and Global Challenges of Reconciliation”, Berlin,31 January–2 February 2005. http://www.gtz.de/de/dokumente/Regional-Report-SE-Asia-en.pdf (10.5.2006).

Dinas Informasi dan Komunikasi Provinsi Maluku. 2005. Semangat Siwalima:Semangat Mempertahankan Keutuhan Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia. Ambon:Dinas Infokom Provinsi Maluku.

Dinas Kebudayaan dan Pariwisata Provinsi Maluku (ed.). 2010. Journal Sail Banda2010 (Edisi 2 Juni). Ambon.

Dinnen, Sinclair (ed.). 2003a. A Kind of Mending: Restorative Justice in the Pacific Islands. Canberra: Pandanus Books.

—— 2003b. Restorative Justice in the Pacific Islands: An Introduction. In S. Dinnen (ed.), A Kind of Mending: Restorative Justice in the Pacific Islands.Canberra: Pandanus Books, 1–34.

Doe, Samuel Gbaydee. 2009. Indigenizing Postconflict State Reconstruction in Africa: A Conceptual Framework. Africa Peace and Conflict Journal 2 (1) June: 1–16.l

Duncan, Christopher R. 2000. The Politics of Going Home: The Future of NorthMoluccan Internally Displaced Persons. Cakalele 11: 81–108.

—— 2009. Monuments and Martyrdom. Memorializing the Dead in Post-conflictNorth Maluku. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 165 (4): 429–458.

Durutalo, Alumita. 2003. Informal Justice in Law and Justice Reform in the PacificRegion. In S. Dinnen (ed.), A Kind of Mending: Restorative Justice in the Pacific Islands. Canberra: Pandanus Books, 165–176.

Dwyer, Leslie & Degung Santikarma. 2007. Speaking from the Shadows: Memory and Mass Violence in Bali. In B. Pouligny, S. Chesterman and A. Schnabel (eds),After Mass Crime: Rebuilding States and Communities. Tokyo/New York: United Nations University Press, 190–214.

Early Warning System Conflict (EWSC) (ed.). 2007a. Laporan Musyawarah Besar I Majelis Latupati Maluku Periode 2007–2010, Baileo Siwalima, Ambon, 29–31 Oktober 2007 (3 volumes). Buku I: Kumpulan Keputusan dan Rekomendasi. Ambon: EWSC.

—— (ed.). 2007b. Laporan Musyawarah Besar I Majelis Latupati Maluku Periode2007–2010, Baileo Siwalima, Ambon, 29–31 Oktober 2007 (3 volumes). Buku III:Prosiding. Ambon: EWSC.

Ellen, Roy F. 1997. On the Contemporary Uses of Colonial History and the Legitimation of Political Status in Archipelagic Southeast Seram. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 28 (1) March: 78–102.

—— 2003. On the Edge of the Banda Zone: Past and Present in the Social Organization of a Moluccan Trading Network. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

Ellis, Donald G. 2006. Transforming Conflict: Communication and EthnopoliticalConflict. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

Elwert, Georg. 2003. Hilfe und Intervention in Gewaltmärkten. In U. Kievelitz and R. Poeschke (eds), Friedens- und Konfliktarbeit in Forschung und EZ-Praxis und der Beitrag der Entwicklungsethnologie. Zeitschrift der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Entwicklungsethnologie e.V., Heft 1+2, 2003, 12. Jg. Saarbrücken: Verlag für Entwicklungspolitik Saarbrücken GmbH, 96–108.

Eppang, Lince. 2009. Sebuah Asa dari Negeri Rempah-rempah. Suara PembaruanNusantara, 26 November 2009: 13. http://epaper.suarapembaruan.com/default.aspx?iid=31391&startpage=page0000013 (15.4.2010).

226 Bibliography

Erb, Maribeth. 2007. Adat Revivalism in Western Flores: Culture, Religion, and Land. In J. S. Davidson and D. Henley (eds), The Revival of Tradition in IndonesianPolitics: The Deployment of Adat from Colonialism to Indigenism. London/NewYork: Routledge, 247–274.

Eriksen, Thomas Hylland. 2001. Between Universalism and Relativism: A Critique of the UNESCO Concept of Culture. In J. K. Cowan, M.-B. Dembour and R. A. Wilson (eds), Culture and Rights: Anthropological Perspectives. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 127–148.

Far-Far, D. C., A. G. Wokanubun & E. Rahantoknam. 1999. Laporan Pelaksanaan Tugas Tim 19 Ambon – Jakarta dalam Misi Kemanusiaan di Maluku Tenggara. 8–14April 1999. Ambon/Tual.

Fasseur, C. 2007. Colonial Dilemma: Van Vollenhoven and the Struggle between Adat Law and Western Law in Indonesia. In J. S. Davidson and D. Henley (eds),The Revival of Tradition in Indonesian Politics: The Deployment of Adat fromColonialism to Indigenism. London/New York: Routledge, 50–67.

Fauzi, Noer & R. Yando Zakaria. 2002. Democratizing Decentralization: LocalInitiatives from Indonesia. Paper presented at the 9th Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property, Victoria Falls,Zimbabwe. http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/archive/00000818/01/fauzin170502.pdf (7.11.2005).

Finnström, Sverker. 2005. Carolyn Nordstrom, Shadows of War: Violence, Power, and International Profiteering in the Twenty-First Century (Berkeley: Universityof California Press, 2004). Anthropological Quarterly 78 (2): 491–496.y

—— 2010. Reconciliation Grown Bitter? War, Retribution, and Ritual Action in Northern Uganda. In R. Shaw and L. Waldorf (eds), Localizing Transitional Justice: Interventions and Priorities After Mass Violence. Stanford, CA: StanfordUniversity Press, 135–156.

Fischer, Martina & Norbert Ropers. 2004. Introduction: Berghof Handbook for Conflict Transformation. Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management. http://www.berghof-handbook.net (23.3.2007).

Forsberg, Tuomas. 2003. The Philosophy and Practice of Dealing with the Past. In N. Biggar (ed.), Burying the Past: Making Peace and Doing Justice After CivilConflict. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 65–84.

Foster, Mary LeCron. 1988. Conclusion – Expanding the Anthropology of Peace andConflict. In R. A. Rubinstein and M. L. Foster (eds), The Social Dynamics of Peace and Conflict: Culture in International Security. Boulder/London: Westview Press, 179–191.

Fox, James J. 1995. Installing the ‘Outsider’ Inside: The Exploration of an Epistemic Austronesian Cultural Theme and its Social Significance. Paper pre-sented at the First Conference of the European Association for Southeast AsianStudies, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands, 29 June–1 July 1995.http://rspas.anu.edu.au/people/personal/foxxj_rspas/outsider.pdf (20.5.2011).

Fraassen, Chris Frans van. 1972. Ambon-Rapport. Doktoraalskriptie. Leiden:Stichting Werkgroep Studiereizen Ontwikkelingslanden.

—— 1987. Ternate, de Molukken en de Indonesische Archipel. Van Soa-organisatie en Vierdeling: Een Studie van Traditionele Samenleving en Cultuur in Indonesie. Deel II.[Dissertation, Leiden University, Leiden]

—— 1997a. Bronnen betreffende de Midden-Molukken 1900–1940. Deel 2. Den Haag:Instituut voor Nederlandse Geschiedenis.

Bibliography 227

—— 1997b. Bronnen betreffende de Midden-Molukken 1900–1940. Deel 3. Den Haag:Instituut voor Nederlandse Geschiedenis.

Fraassen, Chris Frans van & P. Jobse. 1997. Bronnen betreffende de Midden-Molukken1900–1940. Deel 4. Den Haag: Instituut voor Nederlandse Geschiedenis.

Freeman, Michael. 2000. Universal Rights and Particular Cultures. In M. Jacobsen and O. Bruun (eds), Human Rights and Asian Values: Contesting National Identitiesand Cultural Representations in Asia. Surrey: Curzon, 43–58.

Front Islam Maluku. 1999. Pernyataan Sikap, 16 April 1999, Jakarta.Fuest, Veronika. 2008. ‘This is the Time to Get in Front’: Changing Roles and

Opportunities for Women in Liberia. African Affairs 107/427: 201–224.—— 2009. Liberia’s Women Acting for Peace: Collective Action in a War-affected

Country. In S. Ellis and I. v. Kessel (eds), Movers and Shakers: Social Movements inAfrica. Leiden/Boston: Brill, 114–137.

—— 2010. Contested Inclusions: Pitfalls of NGO Peace-Building Activities inLiberia. Africa Spectrum 45 (2): 3–33.

Galtung, Johan. 1969. Violence, Peace, and Peace Research. Journal of PeaceResearch 6 (1): 167–191.

—— 2001. After Violence, Reconstruction, Reconciliation, and Resolution:Coping with Visible and Invisible Effects of War and Violence. In M. Abu-Nimer (ed.), Reconciliation, Justice, and Coexistence: Theory & Practice. Lanham,MD: Lexington Books, 3–23.

Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.Gerakan BakuBae Maluku, Universitas Pattimura, Yayasan Kemala & Yayasan Tifa.

2003. Berpijak di Atas Bumi Kultural Menata Masa Depan Maluku. SebuahPaparan Hasil Musyawarah Raja/Latupati di Maluku untuk Resolusi Konflik danMenata Masa Depan Maluku (Kampus Universitas Pattimura, 9–11 January 2003). Jakarta.

Gerakan Perempuan Peduli. 1999. Laporan Kegiatan Gerakan Perempuan Peduli:Dalam Membantu Menanggulangi Masalah Kerusuhan di Maluku Secara Khusus di Ambon. Ambon.

Gibbs, Sara. 1997. Postwar Social Reconstruction in Mozambique: Reframing Children’s Experiences of Trauma and Healing. In K. Kumar (ed.), Rebuilding Societies After Civil War: Critical Roles for International Assistance. London/Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 227–238.

Giesen, Bernhard. 2004. Noncontemporaneity, Asynchronicity and DividedMemories. Time & Society 13 (1): 27–40.y

Goodale, Mark. 2006. Toward a Critical Anthropology of Human Rights. Current Anthropology 47 (3): 485–511.y

Goss, Jon D. 2004. Understanding the “Maluku Wars”: Overview of Sources of Communal Conflict and Prospects for Peace. Cakalele 11: 7–39.

Green, Reginald Herbold & Ismail I Ahmed. 1999. Rehabilitation, SustainablePeace and Development: Towards Reconceptualisation. Third World Quarterly20 (1): 189–206.

Guenther, Mathias, Justin Kenrick, Adam Kuper, Evie Plaice, Trond Thuen, Patrick Wolfe, Werner Zips & Alan Barnard. 2006. Discussion: The Concept of Indigeneity. Social Anthropology 14 (1): 17–32.y

Hadar, Ivan A. (ed.). 2000a. Ambon Damai, Lebe Bae. Jakarta: IDe & The British Council Jakarta.

228 Bibliography

—— 2000b. Search Conference on Ambon. In I. A. Hadar (ed.), Ambon Damai,Lebe Bae. Jakarta: IDe & The British Council Jakarta, xv.

Hadiwinata, Bob S. 2003. The Politics of NGOs in Indonesia: Developing Democracy and Managing a Movement. Rethinking Southeast Asia 3. London/New York: RoutledgeCurzon.

Hadiz, Vedi R. 2010. Localising Power in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia: A Southeast Asia Perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Hamengkubuwono X, Sri Sultan. 2007. Merajut Kembali Keindonesiaan Kita.Jakarta: Gramedia.

Hann, Chris. 2010. Civil Society. In A. Barnard and J. Spencer (eds), Encyclopediaof Social and Cultural Anthropology. London/New York: Routledge, 122–123.

Harlacher, Thomas. 2009. Traditional Ways of Coping with Consequences of Traumatic Stress in Acholiland. Northern Ugandan Ethnography from aWestern Psychological Perspective. http://ethesis.unifr.ch/theses/downloads.php?file=HarlacherT.pdf (12.12.2010).

Harrison, Graham. 1999. Conflict Resolution in a ‘Non-Conflict Situation’:Tension & Reconciliation in Mecúfi, Northern Mozambique. Review of AfricanPolitical Economy 26 (81) September: 407–414.y

Hastrup, Kirsten & Karen Fog Olwig. 1997. Introduction. In K. F. Olwig and K. Hastrup (eds), Siting Culture: The Shifting Anthropological Object. London/New York: Routledge, 1–14.

Hayden, Robert M. 2002. Antagonistic Tolerance: Competitive Sharing of Religious Sites in South Asia and the Balkans. Current Anthropology 43 (2): 205–231.y

Hayner, Priscilla B. 2002. Unspeakable Truths: Facing the Challenge of TruthCommissions. New York/London: Routledge.

Heesterman, J. C. 1986. State and Adat. In C. A. Bayly and D. H. A. Kolff (eds), Two Colonial Empires: Comparative Essays on the History of India and Indonesia inthe 19th Century. Dordrecht: Nijhoff, 189–201.

Henley, David & Jamie S. Davidson. 2007. Introduction: Radical Conservatism –The Protean Politics of Adat. In J. S. Davidson and D. Henley (eds), The Revivalof Tradition in Indonesian Politics: The Deployment of Adat from Colonialism to Indigenism. London/New York: Routledge, 1–49.

Hidayat, Syarif. 2007. Too Much Too Soon: Local State Elite’s Perspective on and the Puzzle of Contemporary Indonesian Regional Autonomy Policy. Jakarta: RajaGrafindoPersada.

Hobsbawm, Eric. 1983. Introduction: Inventing Traditions. In E. Hobsbawm andT. Ranger (eds), The Invention of Tradition. London: Cambridge University Press,1–14.

Hobsbawm, Eric & Terence Ranger (eds). 1983. The Invention of Tradition. London:Cambridge University Press.

Hoëvell, G. W. W. C. Baron van. 1875. Ambon en meer Bepaaldelijk de Oeliasers:Geographisch, Ethnographisch, Politisch en Historisch Geschetst. Dordrecht: Blussé en van Braam.

Hohe, Tanja & Rod Nixon. 2003. Reconciling Justice: ‘Traditional’ Law and StateJudiciary in East Timor. Washington, DC. United States Institute of Peace.

Holleman, F. D. 1923. Het Adat-Grondenrecht van Ambon en de Oeliasers. Delft: W. D. Meinema.

Holleman, J. F. (ed.). 1981. Van Vollenhoven on Indonesian Adat Law. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

Bibliography 229

Holtzappel, Coen J. G. & Martin Ramstedt (eds). 2009. Decentralization and Regional Autonomy in Indonesia: Implementation and Challenges. Singapore/Leiden: ISEAS/IIAS.

Honwana, Alcinda. 1999. Review: A Different Kind of War Story. Carolyn Nordstrom (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1997). AmericanEthnologist 26 (2) May: 504–505.t

Hornbacher, Annette. 2009. Global Conflict in Cosmocentric Perspective: A Balinese Approach to Reconciliation. In B. Bräuchler (ed.), Reconciling Indonesia:Grassroots Agency for Peace. London/New York: Routledge, 34–53.

Howell, Signe. 2012. Cumulative Understandings: Experiences from the Study of Two Southeast Asian Societies. In S. Howell and A. Talle (eds), Returns to the Field: Multitemporal Research and Contemporary Anthropology. Bloomington, IN:Indiana University Press, 153–179.

Howell, Signe & Aud Talle (eds). 2012. Returns to the Field: Multitemporal Researchand Contemporary Anthropology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Howell, Signe & Roy Willis. 1989. Introduction. In S. Howell and R. Willis (eds), Societies at Peace: Anthropological Perspectives. London/New York: Routledge, 1–28.

Huyse, Luc. 2003a. Justice. In D. Bloomfield, T. Barnes and L. Huyse (eds),Reconciliation After Violent Conflict: A Handbook. Stockholm: InternationalInstitute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA), 97–115.

—— 2003b. The Process of Reconciliation. In D. Bloomfield, T. Barnes and L. Huyse (eds), Reconciliation After Violent Conflict: A Handbook. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA), 19–33.

—— 2008. Introduction: Tradition-based Approaches in Peacemaking, Transitional Justice and Reconciliation Policies. In L. Huyse and M. Salter (eds),Traditional Justice and Reconciliation After Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, 1–22.

Huyse, Luc & Mark Salter (eds). 2008. Traditional Justice and Reconciliation After Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.

Institut Tifa Damai Maluku. 2010. Profil Majelis Latupati Kota Ambon. Ambon:ITDM.

Institut Titian Perdamaian, Forum Maluku Baru & Banda’s Culture and HeritageFoundation. 2006. Prosiding Hasil Musyawarah Latupati Maluku untuk Menata Kembali Masa Depan Maluku, 12–14 November 2006. Ambon: Hotel Amans.

International Crisis Group. 2002. Indonesia: The Search for Peace in Maluku. Asia Report No. 31, 8 February 2002, Jakarta/Brussels.

—— 2011. Indonesia: Trouble Again in Ambon. Asia Briefing No. 128, 4 October2011, Jakarta/Brussels.

—— 2012. Indonesia: Cautious Calm in Ambon. Asia Briefing No. 133, 13 February2012, Jakarta/Brussels.

International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA). 2006.Reconciliation and Traditional Justice: Learning from African Experiences – Project Methodology Workshop, Pretoria, 26–27 September 2006 (WorkshopReport). http://www.idea.int/conflict/traditional_justice.cfm (8.1.2008).

International Labour Organization (ILO). 1989. Convention No. 169 onIndigenous and Tribal Peoples in Independent Countries. http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/62.htm (5.8.2006).

230 Bibliography

Jacobsen, Michael. 2002. ‘To be or what to be – that is the question’: Decentralization and Identity in North Sulawesi. In T. Kivimäki, M. Jacobsen and P. S. Kartasasmita(eds), Democracy, Decentralization, Identity and Conflict in Indonesia. Helsinki/Copenhagen: CTS-Conflict Transformation Service, 225–255.

Jacobsen, Michael & Ole Bruun (eds). 2000. Human Rights and Asian Values:Contesting National Identities and Cultural Representations in Asia. Surrey: Curzon.

Jayal, Niraja Gopal. 2011. A False Dichotomy? The Unresolved Tension betweenUniversal and Differentiated Citizenship in India. Oxford Development Studies39 (2): 185–204.

Jensen, Ad. E. 1939. Hainuwele. Volkserzählungen von der Molukken-Insel Ceram.Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.

—— 1948. Die Drei Ströme: Züge aus dem Geistigen und Religiösen Leben der Wemale, einem Primitiv-Volk in den Molukken. Leipzig: Otto Harrassowitz.

Jenson, Jane & Martin Papillon. 2001. The Changing Boundaries of Citizenship.A Review and a Research Agenda. http://www.rcrpp.org/documents/2096_fr.pdf (22.5.2013).

Joint-Committee Baku Bae Maluku. 2000. Prosiding Workshop Masyarakat Menuju Rekonsiliasi di Maluku II (Baku Bae di Maluku), Bali, 22–27 Oktober 2000. Jakarta.

—— 2002. Workshop Baguala – Leihitu Dalam Rangka Pelaksanaan Zona Netral di Nania dan Pembukaan Jalur Jalan, Ambon, 17 September 2002. Ambon.

—— 2004. Kerangka Prioritas Program Conflict Resolution di Maluku untuk 2004–2006. 30 October 2004. Ambon.

Jolly, Margaret & Nicholas Thomas. 1992. The Politics of Tradition in the Pacific: Introduction. Oceania 62 (4) June: 241–248.

Joppke, Christian. 2006. Staatsbürgerschaft und kulturelle Differenz. In K.-S.Rehberg (ed.), Soziale Ungleichheit, Kulturelle Unterschiede. 2. Frankfurt/Main,New York: Campus, 797–812.

Kaartinen, Timo. 2007. How Civility Constitutes Its Publics. Suomen Antropologi:Journal of the Finnish Anthropological Society 32 (3, Special issue: Civility andySocial Relations in South and Southeast Asia) Autumn: 39–49.

—— 2008. Questions of Scale: Violence, Insecurity, and Community in Kei (Eastern Indonesia). Paper presented at the Conference of the EuropeanAssociation of Social Anthropologists, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 26–30 August 2008.

—— 2009. Urban Diaspora and the Question of Community. Suomen Antropologi: Journal of the Finnish Anthropological Society 34 (3) Autumn: 56–67.y

Kadir, Hatib Abdul. 2012. Sapa Bale Batu, Batu Bale Dia: Politik Revivalisme Tradisi Siwa Lima Orang Ambon Pasca Konflik. LAKON. Jurnal Kajian Sastra & Budaya 1(1) July: 61–75.

Kayser-Whande, Undine & Stephanie Schell-Faucon. 2008. Transitional Justice and Civilian Conflict Transformation: Current Research, Future Questions. CCS Working Papers No. 10, Marburg: Zentrum für Konfliktforschung, Philipps-Universität Marburg. http://www.uni-marburg.de/konfliktforschung/pdf/ccs_wp10.pdf (5.11.2010).

Keesing, Roger M. & Robert Tonkinson (eds). 1982. Reinventing Traditional Culture:The Politics of Kastom in Island Melanesia (Special issue of Mankind 13 (4) August):The Anthropological Society of New South Wales.

Kelman, Herbert C. 2004. Reconciliation as Identity Change: A Social-Psychological Perspective. In Y. Bar-Siman-Tov (ed.), From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 111–124.

Bibliography 231

Kementerian Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia. 2010. Daftar Provinsi, Kabupaten/Kota Seluruh Indonesia Edisi: Juni 2009. Ditjen Otda KEMDAGRI. http://www.depdagri.go.id/basis-data/2010/01/28/daftar-provinsi (2.9.2012).

Kemp, Graham. 2004. The Concept of Peaceful Societies. In G. Kemp and D. P. Fry (eds), Keeping the Peace: Conflict Resolution and Peaceful Societies Around the World. New York/London: Routledge, 1–10.

Kent, Lia. 2004. Unfulfilled Expectations: Community Views on CAVR’s Community Reconciliation Process. Dili, East Timor: Judicial System Monitoring Programme.http://www.jsmp.minihub.org/Reports/jsmpreports/CAVR_Reports/cavr_report_2004_e.pdf (29.3.2006).

Kievelitz, Uwe. 2003. Strategic Conflict Assessments in German DevelopmentCooperation: Approaches, Experiences, Impacts. In U. Kievelitz and R. Poeschke(eds), Friedens- und Konfliktarbeit in Forschung und EZ-Praxis und der Beitrag der Entwicklungsethnologie. Zeitschrift der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Entwicklungsethnologiee.V., Heft 1+2, 2003, 12. Jg. Saarbrücken: Verlag für Entwicklungspolitik Saar-brücken GmbH, 165–178.

Kipnis, Andrew. 2004. Anthropology and the Theorisation of Citizenship. TheAsia Pacific Journal of Anthropology 5 (3): 257–278.y

KITLV. 1922. Adatrechtbundels XXI: Groote Oost en Philippijnen. ‘s-Gravenhage:Martinus Nijhoff.

Kivimäki, Timo, Michael Jacobsen & Pius Suratman Kartasasmita (eds). 2002. Democracy, Decentralization, Identity and Conflict in Indonesia. Helsinki/Copenhagen: CTS-Conflict Transformation Service.

Klinken, Gerry van. 2001. The Maluku Wars: Bringing Society Back In. Indonesia71 (April): 1–26.

—— 2010. “Ale Rasa Beta Rasa”: Menyusun Sejarah Bersama di Ambon. Paperpresented at a workshop on “Dialogue and Reflecting Together on 10 YearsMaluku Conflict” (Dialog dan Refleksi Bersama 10 Tahun Konflik Maluku),Ambon, 19 January 2010.

—— 2014. “Ale Rasa Beta Rasa”: Menyusun Sejarah Bersama di Ambon. InJ. Manuputty, Z. Salampessy, I. Ali-Fauzi and I. Rafsadi (eds), Carita Orang Basudara. Kisah-kisah Perdamaian dari Maluku. Ambon: Lembaga Antar ImanMaluku, 1–11.

Knaap, G. J. 1987. Kruidnagelen en Christenen. De Verenigde Oost-Indische Compagnie en de Bevolking van Ambon 1656–1696. Verhandelingen van het Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 125. Leiden: KITLV Press.

Kohl, Karl-Heinz. 2009. Die Ethnologie und die Rekonstruktion traditionellerOrdnungen. In J. Fried and M. Stolleis (eds), Wissenskulturen. Über die Erzeugung und Weitergabe von Wissen. Frankfurt am Main/New York: Campus Verlag, 159–180.

Kolig, Erich. 2005. The Politics of Indigenous – or Ingenious – Tradition: SomeThoughts on the Australian and New Zealand Situation. In T. Otto and P. Pedersen (eds), Tradition and Agency: Tracing Cultural Continuity and Invention.Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, 292–326.

Kopong Medan, Karolus. 2006. Peradilan Rekonsiliatif: Konstruksi PenyelesaianKasus Kriminal Menurut Masyarakat Lamaholot di Flores, Nusa Tenggara Timur.[Dissertation, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang]

Koppe, Karlheinz. 2005. Zur Geschichte der Friedens- und Konfliktforschung im20. Jahrhundert. In P. Imbusch and R. Zoll (eds), Friedens- und Konfliktforschung:Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 17–67.

232 Bibliography

Kraemer, Hendrik. 1927. Mededelingen over den Islam op Ambon en Haroekoe. Djawa 7 (2): 77–88.

Kritz, Neil J. (ed.). 1995. Transitional Justice. 3 Vols. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.

Kuper, Adam. 2003. The Return of the Native. Current Anthropology 44 (3): 389–402.yKurtenbach, Sabine. 2007. Why is Liberal Peace-building so Difficult? Some

Lessons from Central America. GIGA Working Paper Series 59. Hamburg: GIGA.Kyed, Helene Maria & Lars Buur. 2006. Recognition and Democratisation: ‘New

Roles’ for Traditional Leaders in Sub-Saharan Africa. DIIS Working Paper No. 2006/11, Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS).

Kymlicka, Will. 1996. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights.Oxford: Oxford University Press.

—— 2001. Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism, and Citizenship.Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kymlicka, Will & Baogang He. 2005. Introduction. In W. Kymlicka and B. He(eds), Multiculturalism in Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–21.

Kymlicka, Will & Wayne Norman. 1994. Return of the Citizen: A Survey of RecentWork on Citizenship Theory. Ethics 104 (2) January: 352–381.

—— 2000. Citizenship in Culturally Diverse Societies: Issues, Contexts, Concepts.In W. Kymlicka and W. Norman (eds), Citizenship in Diverse Societies. New York: Oxford University Press, 1–41.

Laboratorium Sosiologi FISIP UNPATTI & PTD Kabupaten Seram Bagian Barat (SBB) (eds). 2010. Sejarah Tala Batai: Sebuah Perspektif Kekinian Masyarakat Batang Aer Tala. Ambon/Yogyakarta: Peace Through Development Kabupaten Seram Bagian Barat (printed by Percetakan UPN “Veteran” Yogyakarta).

Laksono, P. M. 1996. Exchange and Its Other. In D. Mearns and C. Healey (eds),Remaking Maluku. Social Transformation in Eastern Indonesia. Northern Territory University, Australia, 156–176.

—— 2002. We are All One: How Custom Overcame Religious Rivalry in Southeast Maluku. Inside Indonesia 70 (April–June): 7/8. http://www.insideindonesia.org/edit70/Laksono1.htm (20.9.2004).

Lange, Kirk. 2000. Prospects for Conflict Transformation in Maluku: Mapping Assets, Spaces, and Moments for Peacebuilding. Cakalele 11: 131–153.

Lange, Kirk & Jon D. Goss. 2000. Impacts of Violence and Prospects for Peace. Cakalele 11: 1–5.

Laplanche, J. & J.-B. Pontalis. 1972. Aggression, Aggressivität, Aggressionstrieb. InJ. Laplanche and J.-B. Pontalis (eds), Das Vokabular der Psychoanalyse. Frankfurtam Main: Suhrkamp, 40–46.

Larcom, Joan. 1982. The Invention of Convention. Mankind 13 (4, Special issue:dReinventing Traditional Culture: The Politics of Kastom in Island Melanesia,edited by Roger M. Keesing and Robert Tonkinson) August: 330–337.

Lawalata, Julius. 2004. Fakta Tak Terlihat Posisi Perempuan dalam Konflik Sosial di Maluku. Jurnal Perempuan 33: 7–20.

Lederach, John Paul. 1995. Preparing for Peace: Conflict Transformation Across Cultures. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.

—— 1997. Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies. Washington,DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.

Lee, Juliet Patricia. 1997. The Changing Face of the Village in Ambon. Cakalele 8:59–77.

Bibliography 233

—— 1999. Out of Order: The Politics of Modernity in Indonesia. [Dissertation, Universityof Virginia, Virginia]

Leirissa, R. Z., John A. Pattikayhatu & Soenjata Kartadarmadja, 1982/1983. Sejarah Sosial di Daerah Maluku. Ambon: Direktorat Sejarah dan Nilai Tradisional.

Lembaga Kebudayaan Daerah Maluku (ed.). 2005. Maluku Menyambut MasaDepan. Ambon: LKDM.

—— 2007. Kekayaan Seni Ukir di Maluku/The Richness of Maluku’s Art of Carving.Ambon: LKDM.

—— 2010. The Magnificant Underwater World of Ambon Island, Maluku – Indonesia.Ambon: LKDM.

Li, Tania Murray. 2000. Articulating Indigenous Identity in Indonesia: Resource Politics and the Tribal Slot. Berkeley Workshop on Environmental Politics,Working Paper 7, Berkeley. http://globetrotter.berkeley.edu/EnvirPol/WP/07-Li.pdf (24.10.2005).

—— 2007. Adat in Central Sulawesi: Contemporary Deployments. In J. S. Davidson and D. Henley (eds), The Revival of Tradition in Indonesian Politics: The Deployment of Adat from Colonialism to Indigenism. London/New York: Routledge, 337–370.

Linnekin, Jocelyn. 1992. On the Theory and Politics of Cultural Construction inthe Pacific. Oceania 62 (4) June: 249–263.

Littik, S. A. M., E. Baadila, M. B. Pattimahu, E. R. M. Toule, O. Lasol, A. Anwar &Z. Samal. 2005a. Access to Justice Assessment Maluku Province. Phase I – Mapping Report. Ambon: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Pusat Studi Pedesaandan Kawasan Universitas Gadjah Mada, Badan Perencanaan PembangunanNasional (BAPPENAS), United Nations Development Program (UNDP).

—— 2005b. Access to Justice Assessment Maluku Province. Phase II. Ambon: FakultasHukum Universitas Pattimura, Pusat Studi Pedesaan dan Kawasan UniversitasGadjah Mada, Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional (BAPPENAS), United Nations Development Program (UNDP).

—— 2005c. Access to Justice Assessment Maluku Province. Phase III. Ambon: FakultasHukum Universitas Pattimura, Pusat Studi Pedesaan dan Kawasan UniversitasGadjah Mada, Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional (BAPPENAS), United Nations Development Program (UNDP).

—— 2005d. Access to Justice Assessment Maluku Province. Site Selection Report.Ambon: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Pusat Studi Pedesaan danKawasan Universitas Gadjah Mada, Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional (BAPPENAS), United Nations Development Program (UNDP).

Loch, Alexander & Vanessa Prueller. 2011. Dealing with Conflicts After the Conflict: European and Indigenous Approaches to Conflict Transformation inEast Timor. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 28 (3) Spring: 315–329.y

Luhmann, Niklas. 1975. Legitimation durch Verfahren [2nd ed.]. Darmstadt:Luchterhand.

Lutz, Dieter S. 2004. Friedensforschung – Normativ, Interdisziplinär, Praxisorientiert.In U. Eckern, L. Herwartz-Emden and R.-O. Schultze (eds), Friedens- und Konfliktforschung in Deutschland: Eine Bestandsaufnahme. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 23–32.

Mac Ginty, Roger. 2008. Indigenous Peace-Making Versus the Liberal Peace.Cooperation and Conflict 43 (2): 139–163.t

—— 2010. Hybrid Peace: The Interaction Between Top-Down and Bottom-UpPeace. Security Dialogue 41: 391–412.

234 Bibliography

Majelis Latupati Kota Ambon. 2008. Memory Penggelaran dan Pengukuhan “KapalaAdat Kota Ambon”, 7 September 2008. Ambon: MLKA.

Malik, Ichsan. 2003. BakuBae: Gerakan dari Akar Rumput untuk MenghentikanKekerasan di Maluku/BakuBae: The Community Based Movement for ReconciliationProcess in Maluku. Jakarta: BakuBae Maluku.

Malik, Ichsan, Max Pattinaja, Saleh Putuhena, Teuku Yakob et al. (eds). 2003.Breaking the Violence with Compassion: BAKUBAE. Jakarta: Civil Society Alliance for Democracy (YAPPIKA).

Maluku Reconciliation and Reconstruction Meeting. 2004. Recommendations for Reconciliation and Reconstruction in Maluku. London. Islamic ChristianOrganisation for Reconciliation and Reconstruction (IICORR Ltd) and British Foreign Office.

Manuhutu, Wim. 2000. Een Jaar Geweld op de Molukken: Een Terugblik. In W. Manuhutu, J. Meuleman, N. Schulte Nordholt and J. Willemse (eds), MalukuManis, Maluku Menangis. De Molukken in Crisis. Een Poging tot de Verklaring van de Geweldsexplosie op de Molukken. Utrecht: Moluks Historisch Museum/MoluccanInformation and Documentation Center, 7–18.

Manuputty, Jacky. 2004. Community/Brotherhood Education: An Effort for Development of Education Model for Peace during Post Maluku Conflict. 19December 2004. Ambon: Masariku Network.

—— 2006. Lembaga Antar Iman Maluku/Maluku Interfaith Institution (PowerPoint Presentation). Ambon: Lembaga Antar Iman Maluku (LAIM).

—— 2010a. The Maluku Conflict and the Process of Gaining Peace (A CoconutLeaf Plaited-Mat Strategy). Paper presented at the 60th General Assembly of Eukumindo, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands, 21–23 October 2010.

—— 2010b. Membuka Pintu Dialog: Pembelajaran Dari Pengalaman ELAIEM (unpubM -lished MS). Ambon.

—— 2014a. Gandong’ee, Mari Manyanyi! In J. Manuputty, Z. Salampessy, I. Ali-Fauzi and I. Rafsadi (eds), Carita Orang Basudara. Kisah-kisah Perdamaian dariMaluku. Ambon: Lembaga Antar Iman Maluku, 357–363.

—— 2014b. Titik-titik Balik di Jalan Orang Basudara. In J. Manuputty, Z.Salampessy, I. Ali-Fauzi and I. Rafsadi (eds), Carita Orang Basudara. Kisah-kisah Perdamaian dari Maluku. Ambon: Lembaga Antar Iman Maluku, 141–150.

Manuputty, Jacky, Zairin Salampessy, Ihsan Ali-Fauzi & Irsyad Rafsadi (eds). 2014.Carita Orang Basudara. Kisah-kisah Perdamaian dari Maluku. Ambon: Lembaga Antar Iman Maluku.

Marcus, George E. 1995. Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 95–117.y

Marut, Donatus K. 2010. Adat Community Movement in Maluku – Current Situation and Developments. http://www.indiana.edu/~iascp/bali/papers/Maret_D.pdf (5.7.2010).

McCarthy, John F. 2004. Changing to Gray: Decentralization and the Emergence of Volatile Socio-legal Configurations in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Asia Research Centre, Murdoch University, Australia. http://wwwarc.murdoch.edu.au/wp/wp101.pdf (11.11.2004).

McEvoy, Kieran & Lorna McGregor. 2008a. Transitional Justice from Below: AnAgenda for Research, Policy and Praxis. In K. McEvoy and L. McGregor (eds),Transitional Justice from Below: Grassroots Activism and the Struggle for Change. Oxford/Portland, OR: Hart, 1–13.

Bibliography 235

—— (eds). 2008b. Transitional Justice from Below: Grassroots Activism and the Struggle for Change. Oxford/Portland, OR: Hart.

McWilliam, Andrew. 2005. Houses of Resistance in East Timor: StructuringSociality in the New Nation. Anthropological Forum 15 (1): 27–44.

—— 2007a. Introduction: Restorative Custom: Ethnographic Perspectives onConflict and Local Justice in Timor. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology 8 (1):y1–8.

—— 2007b. Meto Disputes and Peacemaking: Cultural Notes on Conflict and itsResolution in West Timor. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology 8 (1): 75–91.y

—— 2011. Marginal Governance in the Time of Pemekaran: Case Studies from Sulawesi and West Papua. Asian Journal of Social Sciences 39 (2, Special issue:Eastern Indonesia under Reform: The Global, the National and the Local, edited by Birgit Bräuchler and Maribeth Erb): 150–170.

Mead, Margaret. 2000. Warfare is Only an Invention – Not a Biological Necessity (originally published in Asia, XL, 1940: 402–5). In D. P. Barash (ed.), Approaches toPeace: A Reader in Peace Studies. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 19–22.

Mearns, David. 1996. Class, Status and Habitus in Ambon. In D. Mearns andC. Healey (eds), Remaking Maluku. Social Transformation in Eastern Indonesia. Northern Territory University, Australia, 95–105.

—— 1999. Urban Kampongs in Ambon: Whose Domain? Whose Desa? TheAustralian Journal of Anthropology 10 (1): 15–33.y

—— 2002. Looking Both Ways: Models for Justice in East Timor. Sydney: AustralianLegal Resources International. http://www.jsmp.minihub.org/Traditional%20Justice/Reports/Mearns%20Looking%20Both%20Ways%20Report/Mearns%20Looking%20both%20ways.pdf (25.9.2009).

Meier, Barbara. 2011. Mato Oput – Karriere eines Rituals zur sozialen Rekonstruktiontin Norduganda. In S. Buckley-Zistel and T. Kater (eds), Nach Krieg, Gewalt und Repression: Vom schwierigen Umgang mit der Vergangenheit. Baden-Baden:NOMOS, 185–203.

Meitzner Yoder, Laura S. 2007. Hybridising Justice: State-Customary Interactionsover Forest Crime and Punishment in Oecusse, East Timor. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology 8 (1): 43–57.y

Merry, Sally Engle. 2005. Transnational Human Rights and Local Activism: Mapping the Middle. http://www.law.berkeley.edu/files/csls/Merry_AA_Transnational_Human_Rights_2006.pdf (12.12.2010).

—— 2006. Human Rights & Gender Violence: Translating International Law into LocalJustice. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.

Merwe, Hugo van der. 2003. National and Community Reconciliation: CompetingAgendas in the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission. In N. Biggar (ed.), Burying the Past: Making Peace and Doing Justice After Civil Conflict.Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 101–124.

Messer, Ellen. 1993. Anthropology and Human Rights. Annual Review of Anthropology 22: 221–249.y

Ministry of Justice, Ministry of Interior & UNDP Cambodia. 2007. A Case Studyof Indigenous Traditional Legal Systems and Conflict Resolution in Rattanakiriand Mondulkiri Provinces, Cambodia (Executive Summary). UNDP. http://www.un.org.kh/undp/media/files/indig_es_eng.pdf (2.11.2011).

Minow, Martha. 1998. Between Vengeance and Forgiveness: Facing History After Genocide and Mass Violence. Boston: Beacon Press.

236 Bibliography

Mitchell, Jon P. 2010. Ritual. In A. Barnard and J. Spencer (eds), Encyclopedia of Social and Cultural Anthropology. London/New York: Routledge, 617–620.

Molenaar, Arthur. 2005. Gacaca: Grassroots Justice After Genocide – The Key to Reconciliation in Rwanda? African Studies Centre Research Report 77/2005.Leiden: African Studies Centre.

Montagu, Ashley. 1994. Foreword. In L. E. Sponsel and T. Gregor (eds), The Anthropology of Peace and Nonviolence. Boulder/London: Lynne RiennerPublishers, ix–xiv.

Moore, Sally Falk. 1986. Social Facts & Fabrications: Customary Law on Kilimanjaro,1880–1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mouffe, Chantal. 2004. Pluralism, Dissensus and Democratic Citizenship. In F. Inglis (ed.), Education and the Good Society. Basingstoke, UK: PalgraveMacmillan.

Muis, M. Noer, Prita Laura, Harum Sekartaji, Ria Qorina Lubis, Harry Susanto & Yvonne Armanto. 2010. Amazing Ambon – Above, Under and Beyond. Jakarta: NMbooks.

Nee, Ann & Peter Uvin. 2010. Silence and Dialogue: Burundians’ Alternatives toTransitional Justice. In R. Shaw and L. Waldorf (eds), Localizing TransitionalJustice: Interventions and Priorities After Mass Violence. Stanford, CA: StanfordUniversity Press, 157–182.

Nic Craith, Máiréad. 2004. Culture and Citizenship in Europe. Questions for Anthropologists. Social Anthropology 12 (3): 289–300.y

Nordstrom, Carolyn. 1997a. A Different Kind of War Story. Philadelphia: Universityof Pennsylvania Press.

—— 1997b. The Eye of the Storm: From War to Peace – Examples from Sri Lanka and Mozambique. In D. P. Fry and K. Björkqvist (eds), Cultural Variation in Conflict Resolution: Alternatives to Violence. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 91–103.

—— 2004. Shadows of War: Violence, Power, and International Profiteering in theTwenty-First Century. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Oberschall, Anthony. 2007. Conflict and Peace Building in Divided Societies: Responses to Ethnic Violence. London/New York: Routledge.

Ocen, Julius. 2007. Can Traditional Rituals Bring Justice to Northern Uganda? AR No. 123, 25 July 2007. London: Institute of War & Peace Reporting. http://iwpr.net (29.8.2007).

Ortner, Sherry B. 2006. Anthropology and Social Theory: Culture, Power, and theActing Subject. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

Orywal, Erwin. 1996. Krieg und Frieden in den Wissenschaften. In E. Orywal, A. Rao and M. Bollig (eds), Krieg und Kampf: Die Gewalt in unseren Köpfen. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer Verlag, 13–43.

Ospina, Sofi & Tanja Hohe. 2001. Traditional Power Structures and the Community Empowerment and Local Governance Project (Final Report presented to CEP/PMU, ETTA/UNTAET and the World Bank). Dili. http://info.worldbank.org/etools/docs/library/139608/finalreport.pdf (4.12.2007).

Ott, Martin & Roman Poeschke. 2003. Mtendere – Peace – Frieden: Friedensent-wicklung und Kulturarbeit in Malawi. In U. Kievelitz and R. Poeschke (eds), Friedens- und Konfliktarbeit in Forschung und EZ-Praxis und der Beitrag der Entwicklungsethnologie. Zeitschrift der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Entwicklungsethnologiee.V., Heft 1+2, 2003, 12. Jg. Saarbrücken: Verlag für Entwicklungspolitik Saarbrücken GmbH, 266–283.

Bibliography 237

Otto, Ton & Poul Pedersen. 2000. Tradition Between Continuity and Invention:An Introduction. Journal of the Danish Ethnographic Society 42 (Special issue: yAnthropology and the Revival of Tradition: Between Cultural Continuity andInvention): 3–17.

—— 2005. Disentangling Traditions: Culture, Agency and Power. In T. Otto and P. Pedersen (eds), Tradition and Agency: Tracing Cultural Continuity and Invention.Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, 11–49.

Paffenholz, Thania. 2009. Civil Society and Peacebuilding (Summary of Results for a Comparative Research Project). CCDP Working Paper 4, Geneva: Centre onConflict, Development and Peacebuilding (CCDP).

Palmer, Blair. 2004. Memories of Migration: Butonese Migrants Returning toButon After the Maluku Conflicts 1999–2002. Antropologi Indonesia (Special issue): 87–99. http://www.jai.or.id/jurnal/2004/sv/08bp_sv04.pdf (28.1.2006).

Panggabean, Samsu Rizal. 2006. Educating to Handle Conflict and Avoid Violence.In C. A. Coppel (ed.), Violent Conflicts in Indonesia: Analysis, Representation,Resolution. London/New York: Routledge, 217–228.

Panitia Acara Pelantikan Raja Negeri Hutumuri. 2005. Buku Panduan Pelantikan Raja Negeri Hutumuri, 5 April 2005. Hutumuri.

Pankhurst, Donna. 1999. Issues of Justice and Reconciliation in Complex PoliticalEmergencies: Conceptualising Reconciliation, Justice and Peace. Third World Quarterly 20 (1): 239–256.y

Pariela, Tonny D. 1996. Social Transformation in Soya Atas Village. In D. Mearns and C. Healey (eds), Remaking Maluku. Social Transformation in Eastern Indonesia. Northern Territory University, Australia, 106–120.

—— 2000. Otonomi Desa/Negeri Dalam Pengelolaan Wilayah Petuanan. Paper presented at the Workshop “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak-hak Masyarakat Adat Atas Tanah Petuanan Di Maluku Tengah”, Saparua, 26–27 April 2000. Yayasan Sala Waku Maluku.

—— 2005. Orde Baru, Reformasi dan Konflik Sosial di Maluku. In Lembaga Kebudayaan Daerah Maluku (ed.), Maluku Menyambut Masa Depan. Ambon:Lembaga Kebudayaan Daerah Maluku, 180–197.

Pariela, Tonny D. & Tontji Soumokil. 2003. Konflik dan Dampaknya serta Upaya-upaya Rekonsiliasi. [Penelitian Kerusuhan, Laporan Akhir, Universitas Pattimura,Ambon]

Pattikayhatu, John A. 2005. Sekilas Sejarah Provinsi Maluku. In Lembaga Kebudayaan Daerah Maluku (ed.), Maluku Menyambut Masa Depan. Ambon:Lembaga Kebudayaan Daerah Maluku, 30–38.

Pattikayhatu, John A. & Florence Sahusilawane. 2001. Dampak UU 22 Tahun 1999Terhadap Status dan Eksistensi Desa Adat di Wilayah Kotamadya Ambon. Laporan Penelitian. Ambon: Balai Kajian Sejarah dan Nilai Tradisional.

Pattikayhatu, John A., J. Talakua & J. Ririhena. 1993. Sejarah Daerah Maluku.Ambon: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Pattiselanno, J. Th. F. 1999. Tradisi Uli, Pela dan Gandong pada MasyarakatSeram, Ambon dan Uliase. Antropologi Indonesia XXIII (58): 58–70.

Pemerintah Daerah Provinsi Maluku. 2004a. Kebijakan dan Program-ProgramRehabilitasi, Rekonstruksi, Rekonsiliasi dan Pembangunan Maluku PascaPertikaian (Disampaikan oleh Brigjen TNI (Pur) Karel A. Ralahalu, GubernurMaluku, pada Peace and Development Analyses UNDP), 7–9 July 2004, Jakarta.

—— 2004b. Rencana Strategis (RENSTRA) Provinsi Maluku Tahun 2003–2008.Ambon: Pemerintah Daerah Provinsi Maluku.

238 Bibliography

—— 2009. SBY Diberi Gelar Raja Besar Maluku, Kunyah Sirih Pinang Saat DigelariAdat. http://www.malukuprov.go.id/index.php/berita/67-seputar-maluku/108-sby-diberi-gelar-raja-besar-maluku-kunyah-sirih-pinangsaat-digelari-adat(15.4.2010).

Pemerintah Provinsi Maluku. 2003. Keputusan Gubernor Tentang Petunjuk TeknisPenanganan Pengungsi (Nomor 413, 15 November 2003). Ambon: PemerintahProvinsi Maluku.

—— 2007. Rapat Kerja Aparatur Pemerintah Desa dan Kelurahan Povinsi Maluku Tahun 2007: Panduan, 10–13 April 2007. Ambon: Pemerintah Provinsi Maluku.

—— 2009. Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah Provinsi Maluku Tahun2008–2013 (RPJMD 2008–2013). Ambon: Pemerintah Provinsi Maluku.

—— 2010. Keputusan Gubernur Maluku tentang Penetapan Kode dan Data Wilayah Administrasi Pemerintahan Provinsi Maluku Tahun 2010, Nomor: Tahun 2010. Ambon: Pemerintah Provinsi Maluku.

Pemerintah Provinsi Maluku, PMU-PTD Provinsi Maluku & Lembaga Kebudayaan Daerah Maluku. 2009. Laporan Proses Seminar Pendalaman Pemahaman Falsafah Hidup Orang Maluku Perihal Satu Budaya Siwalima Dengan Penerapan di SemuaBidang Kehidupan, 19–21 October 2009. Ambon: Kantor Gubernur Maluku.

Penguasa Darurat Sipil Daerah Maluku (PDSDM). 2002. Laporan Konflik Maluku.November 2002. Ambon: PDSDM.

Perwakilan Dialog Masyarakat Huamual Depan dan Masyarakat Pulau Manipa. 2002. Memorandum of Understanding: Pernyataan atas Pengertian Bersama.Masohi: Yayasan Pengembangan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (YPPM).

Pesiwarissa, Dian N. 2007. Walikota Ambon: Negeri Adat Harus Punya SejarahTertulis. Radio Vox Populi/Radio Baku Bae 23 March 2007. http://www.geocities.com/rumah3poka/rvp260307a.htm (26.3.2007).

Pieris, John. 2004. Tragedi Maluku: Sebuah Krisis Peradaban – Analisis Kritis AspekPolitik, Ekonomi, Sosial-Budaya dan Keamanan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Pietersz, Jemmy. 2002. Kedudukan Lembaga Saniri Negeri Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 1999. TANOAR – Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial danHumaniora 1 (2) December: 11–18.

Pigou, Piers. 2004. The Community Reconciliation Process of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation. Dili: UNDP Timor-Leste. http://www.jsmp.minihub.org/Reports/otherresources/UNDP_ReportOnCRP%5B1%5D.pdf (23.9.2009).

Platenkamp, J. D. M. 2001. Intercultural Conflicts in Indonesia. Paper presented at the Symposium on “Integrating Others: The Appropriation of Modernity”,Institut für Ethnologie, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, 21–23November 2001.

Pottier, Johan. 2003. Negotiating Local Knowledge: An Introduction. In J. Pottier,A. Bicker and P. Sillitoe (eds), Negotiating Local Knowledge: Power and Identity inDevelopment. London: Pluto Press, 1–29.

Pouligny, Beatrice, Bernard Doray & Jean-Clément Martin. 2007. Methodological and Ethical Problems: A Trans-disciplinary Approach. In B. Pouligny, S.Chesterman and A. Schnabel (eds), After Mass Crime: Rebuilding States and Communities. Tokyo/New York: United Nations University Press, 19–40.

Pouligny, Beatrice, Simon Chesterman & Albrecht Schnabel (eds). 2007. After Mass Crime: Rebuilding States and Communities. Tokyo/New York: United Nations University Press.

Bibliography 239

Provincial Government of Maluku. 2004. Strategic Planning (RENSTRA) MalukuProvince 2003–2008. Ambon: Pemerintah Daerah Provinsi Maluku.

Putnam, Robert. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of AmericanCommunity. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Putranto, Hendar. 2007. Perempuan dan Perjuangan Mewujudkan Perdamaian: Model Resolusi Konflik Pasca Orde Baru. http://hendar2006.multiply.com/journal/item/29/Perempuan_dan_Resolusi_Konflik (8.11.2010).

Putuhena, Saleh & Abidin Wakano. 2008. Laporan Penelitian Pemerintahan Negeridan Kampung di Kabupaten Seram Bagian Barat. Ambon.

Putuhena, Saleh, Abidin Wakano, Hasbollah Toisuta, Rudy Rahabeat, Syaipudin Sapsuha & Muhamad Patty. 2009. Sejarah dan Kearifan Hidup Masyarakat MalukuBagian Tengah. Ambon: Pusat Studi Sejarah dan Budaya Maluku (PS2M) & PeaceThrough Development (PTD) Maluku.

Ralahalu, Karel Albert. 2004. Rekonstruksi dan Transformasi Sosial Budaya:Perkuatan Posisi Masyarakat Adat di Maluku Dalam Dinamika MasyarakatModern. Paper presented at the conference “Dialog Budaya Maluku Tahun2004”, Yogyakarta, 23–25 August 2004.

—— 2006. Otonomi Daerah di Tengah Konflik: Merencang Success Story ImplementasiOtonomi Daerah di Provinsi Maluku. Ambon: Media Otda.

—— 2007. Manajemen Pembangunan Provinsi Maluku sebagai Provinsi Kepulauan dengan Berbasis Kearifan (Budaya) Lokal. Paper presented at the Seminar Memperingati Dies Natalis ke 44 dan Wisuda Sarjana Tahun I 2007, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, 13 April 2007.

Ranger, Terence. 1993. The Invention of Tradition Revisited: The Case of ColonialAfrica. In T. Ranger and O. Vaughan (eds), Legitimacy and the State in Twentieth-Century Africa. Oxford: St. Anthony’s College, 62–111.

Rawls, John. 1971. Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Reckwitz, Andreas. 2001. Multikulturalismustheorien und der Kulturbegriff: Vom

Homogenitätsmodell zum Modell kultureller Interferenzen. Berliner Journal für Soziologie 11 (2): 179–200.

Renwarin, W. P. 1986. Tea-Bel: Een Cultuursymbool van Etnische Identiteit. Over Enkele Bloed- en Vriendschapsverbonden van de in Nederland Wonende Keiezen.Den Haag: Pattimura.

Richmond, Oliver P. 2009. Becoming Liberal, Unbecoming Liberalism: Liberal-Local Hybridity via the Everyday as a Response to the Paradoxes of Liberal Peacebuilding. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 3 (3) November: 324–344.g

—— 2011. A Post-Liberal Peace. London: Routledge.Richmond, Oliver P. & Jason Franks. 2007. Liberal Hubris? Virtual Peace in

Cambodia. Security Dialogue 38 (1): 27–48.Rigby, Andrew. 2001. Justice and Reconciliation: After the Violence. Boulder, CO:

Lynne Rienner Publishers.Riry, Abubakar & Pieter George Manoppo. 2007. Menantang Badai, Menabur

Damai: Napak Tilas Raja dan Latupati Merajut Kembali Jaring Basudara. Depok: INSOS Books.

Roberts, David. 2008. Hybrid Polities and Indigenous Pluralities: Advanced Lessons in Statebuilding from Cambodia. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding2 (1) March: 63–86.

Rohdewohld, Rainer. 2003. Decentralisation and the Indonesian Bureaucracy: Major Changes, Minor Impact? In E. Aspinall and G. Fealy (eds), Local Power

240 Bibliography

and Politics in Indonesia: Decentralisation & Democratisation. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 259–274.

Rosaldo, Renato. 1994. Cultural Citizenship and Educational Democracy. Cultural Anthropology 9 (3): 402–411.y

—— 1995. Foreword. In N. García Canclini (ed.), Hybrid Cultures: Strategies for Entering and Leaving Modernity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, xi–xvii.

—— 2003. Introduction: The Borders of Belonging. In R. Rosaldo (ed.), Cultural Citizenship in Island Southeast Asia: Nation and Belonging in the Hinterlands.Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press, 1–15.

Ross, Marc Howard. 2004. Ritual and the Politics of Reconciliation. In Y. Bar-Siman-Tov (ed.), From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press, 197–223.

Rothermund, Dietmar. 1997. Nationalism and the Reconstruction of Traditions in Asia. In S. Kuhnt-Saptodewo, V. Grabowsky and M. Grossheim (eds),Nationalism and Cultural Revival in Southeast Asia: Perspectives from the Centre and the Region. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 13–28.

Rubinstein, Robert A. & Mary LeCron Foster. 1988. Introduction – Revitalizing International Security Analysis: Contributions from Culture and SymbolicProcess. In R. A. Rubinstein and M. L. Foster (eds), The Social Dynamics of Peace and Conflict: Culture in International Security. Boulder/London: Westview Press, 1–14.

Rumphius, Georgius Everhardus. 1910. De Ambonsche Historie (Deel I). Bijdragentot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde van Nederlandsch-Indië. ‘s Gravenhage:Martinus Nijhoff.

Sahuberua, Z. 2005. Pemekaran Wilayah Dalam Perspektif Demokratisasi dan Otonomi Daerah. In Lembaga Kebudayaan Daerah Maluku (ed.), MalukuMenyambut Masa Depan. Ambon: Lembaga Kebudayaan Daerah Maluku,148–158.

Salmon, Hendrik. 2010. Teknik Penyusun Peraturan Negeri, Peraturan KepalaPemerintah Negeri, dan Keputusan Kepala Pemerintah Negeri. Ambon: FakultasHukum Universitas Pattimura.

Sangaji, Arianto. 2007. The Masyarakat Adat Movement in Indonesia: A CriticalInsider’s View. In J. S. Davidson and D. Henley (eds), The Revival of Tradition inIndonesian Politics: The Deployment of Adat from Colonialism to Indigenism.London/New York: Routledge, 319–336.

Sawyer, Amos. 2004. Social Capital, Survival Strategies and their Implications for Post-Conflict Governance in Liberia. Paper presented at the Workshop “PoliticalTheory and Policy Analysis”, Indiana University, Bloomington, 2–6 July 2004.

Saya, Izaak (ed.). 2003. Bunga Rampai: Surat Perdamaian. Ambon: PemerintahAmbon, Perpustakaan Nasional Provinsi Maluku, UNICEF.

Schirch, Lisa. 2001. Ritual Reconciliation. In M. Abu-Nimer (ed.), Reconciliation,Justice, and Coexistence: Theory & Practice. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books,145–161.

Schirmer, Jennifer. 2006. Comment on Mark Goodale’s “Toward a CriticalAnthropology of Human Rights”. Current Anthropology 47 (3): 504–505.y

Schreiber, Wolfgang. 1995. Friede und Friedfertigkeit in der Ethnologie. kea (Zeitschrift für Kulturwissenschaft) Sonderband II: Krieg und Frieden.Ethnologische Perspektiven: 224–236.

Bibliography 241

Schulte Nordholt, Henk. 2003. Renegotiating Boundaries: Access, Agency and Identity in Post-Soeharto Indonesia. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde159 (4): 550–589.

Schulte Nordholt, Henk & Gerry van Klinken (eds). 2007. Renegotiating Boundaries:Local Politics in Post-Suharto Indonesia. Leiden: KITLV Press.

Schulte Nordholt, Nico. 2000. De Molukken als Oefenterrein van een JakartaansMachtsspel. Allerwegen 31 (37): 24–36.

Sen, Amartya. 2009. The Idea of Justice. New York: Penguin Books.Senier, Amy. 2008. Traditional Justice as Transitional Justice: A Comparative Case

Study of Rwanda and East Timor. PRAXIS XXIII: 67–88.Shaw, Rosalind. 2010. Linking Justice with Reintegration? Ex-Combatants and

the Sierra Leone Experiment. In R. Shaw and L. Waldorf (eds), Localizing Transitional Justice: Interventions and Priorities After Mass Violence. Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press, 111–132.

Shaw, Rosalind & Lars Waldorf. 2010a. Introduction: Localizing Transitional Justice. In R. Shaw and L. Waldorf (eds), Localizing Transitional Justice:Interventions and Priorities After Mass Violence. Stanford, CA: Stanford UniversityPress, 3–26.

—— (eds). 2010b. Localizing Transitional Justice: Interventions and Priorities After Mass Violence. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Sieder, Rachel & Jessica Witchell. 2001. Advancing Indigenous Claims through the Law: Reflections on the Guatemalan Peace Process. In J. K. Cowan, M.-B.Dembour and R. A. Wilson (eds), Culture and Rights: Anthropological Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 201–225.

Smyth, Marie. 2003. Putting the Past in its Place: Issues of Victimhood andReconciliation in Northern Ireland’s Peace Process. In N. Biggar (ed.), Burying the Past: Making Peace and Doing Justice After Civil Conflict. Washington, DC:Georgetown University Press, 125–153.

Soselisa, Ina. 2004. Perempuan Cacat Konflik di Ambon dan Upaya Pemulihan.Jurnal Perempuan 33: 51–60.

Sponsel, Leslie E. 1994. The Mutual Relevance of Anthropology and Peace Studies.In L. E. Sponsel and T. Gregor (eds), The Anthropology of Peace and Nonviolence.Boulder/London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1–36.

Sriram, Chandra Lekha. 2007. Justice as Peace? Liberal Peacebuilding and Strategies of Transitional Justice. Global Society 21 (4): 579–591.y

Stamatopoulou, Elsa. 2007. Cultural Rights in International Law. Article 27 of theUniversal Declaration of Human Rights and Beyond. Leiden/Bosten: Martinus Nijhoff.

Stanley, Elizabeth. 2008. The Political Economy of Transitional Justice in Timor-Leste. In K. McEvoy and L. McGregor (eds), Transitional Justice from Below:Grassroots Activism and the Struggle for Change. Oxford/Portland, OR: Hart, 167–187.

Stephens, Matt & Samuel Clark. 2008. Forging the Middle Ground: Engaging Non-State Justice in Indonesia. Jakarta: World Bank. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTINDONESIA/Resources/Publication/280016-1235115695188/5847179-1242977239903/Full.Report.pdf (29.1.2011).

Stevens, Joanna. 2001. Access to Justice in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Role of Traditionaland Informal Justice Systems. London: Penal Reform International. http://www.penalreform.org/publications/access-justice-sub-saharan-africa-0 (3.7.2007).

242 Bibliography

Stover, Eric & Harvey M. Weinstein (eds). 2004. My Neighbor, My Enemy: Justice and Community in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Strathern, Andrew J. & Pamela J. Stewart. 1997. The Problems of Peace-makers in Papua New Guinea: Modalities of Negotiation and Settlement. CornellInternational Law Journal 30 (3): 681–699.

Stresemann, E. 1923. Religiöse Gebräuche auf Seram. Tijdschrift voor IndischeTaal-, Land- en Volkenkunde LXII, Aflevering 2 (April–June): 305–424.

Subagya, Y. Tri. 2009. Women’s Agencies for Peace Building and Reconciliation:Voices from Poso, Sulawesi. In B. Bräuchler (ed.), Reconciling Indonesia: GrassrootsAgency for Peace. London/New York: Routledge, 155–172.

Sulichah, Lilik. 2010. Jenderal George Toisutta, Kepala Staf TNI AD RI. WOM (World of Maluku) XL (November–December): 39–41.

Taman Budaya Provinsi Maluku & PMU-PTD Provinsi Maluku. 2008. Laporan Proses Kegiatan Festival Budaya Maluku Untuk Perdamaian. Ambon: TamanBudaya Provinsi Maluku.

Taylor, Charles. 1994. The Politics of Recognition. In C. Taylor and A. Gutmann (eds), Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press, 25–74.

Taylor, Paul Michael. 2001. Underlying Sources of a Complex, Multilayered, Historic Conflict. Testimony on Religious-Freedom Violations in the Moluccas,Indonesia. Paper presented at the US Commission on International ReligiousFreedom, Washington, 13 February 2001.

Teitel, Ruti G. 2003. Transitional Justice Genealogy. Harvard Human Rights Journal16 (Spring): 69–94.

Telle, Kari. 2009. Swearing Innocence: Performing Justice and ‘Reconciliation’ in Post-New Order Lombok. In B. Bräuchler (ed.), Reconciling Indonesia: GrassrootsAgency for Peace. London/New York: Routledge, 57–76.

Teubner, Gunther. 2009. Self-subversive Justice: Contingency or Transcendence Formula of Law? Modern Law Review 72 (1): 1–23.w

Theidon, Kimberly. 2006. The Micropolitics of Reconciliation in Postwar Peru.Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (3) June: 433–457.

—— 2007. Intimate Enemies: Reconciling the Present in Post-war Communities in Ayacucho, Peru. In B. Pouligny, S. Chesterman and A. Schnabel (eds), After Mass Crime: Rebuilding States and Communities. Tokyo/New York: United Nations University Press, 97–121.

Thorburn, Craig C. 2007. The Acehnese Gampong Three Years On: AssessingLocal Capacity and Reconstruction Assistance in Post-Tsunami Aceh. AcehCommunity Assistance Research Project (ACARP). http://www.indo.ausaid.gov.au/featurestories/acarpreport.pdf (31.7.2008).

—— 2008. Adat Law, Conflict and Reconciliation: The Kei Islands, SoutheastMaluku. In T. Lindsey (ed.), Indonesia: Law and Society. Sydney: The Federation Press, 115–143.

—— 2009. Maluku: The Long Road to Recovery. In B. P. Resosudarmo and F. Jotzo(eds), Working with Nature against Poverty: Development, Resources and theEnvironment in Eastern Indonesia. Singapore: ISEAS, 269–304.

Thufail, Fadjar I. 2007. Transactions in the Reconciliatory Forum: Islah and theLegacy of State Violence in Indonesia. Paper presented at the Conference on

Bibliography 243

“In Search of Reconciliation and Peace in Indonesia and East Timor”, Asia Research Institute, National University of Singapore, 18–20 July 2007.

—— 2010. The Social Life of Reconciliation: Religion and the Struggle for SocialJustice in Post-New Order Indonesia. Working Paper No. 127, Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology, Halle/Saale.

Tim Peneliti Pusat Kajian Konstitusi. 2002. Draft Akademik Perda Malra. Ambon:Universitas Pattimura.

—— 2005–10. Laporan Penelitian Sistem Pemerintahan Adat di Kabupaten Maluku Tenggara. Ambon: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura.

—— 2006/07. Laporan Hasil Penelitian Sistem Pemerintahan Adat di KabupatenMaluku Tenggara Barat. Ambon: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura.

TIRUS. 1999. “Program Emergency” untuk Maluku Tenggara (PP Kei). Ambon: TIRUS.Titahelu, Ronald Zelfianus. 2005. Hukum Adat Maluku Dalam Konteks Pluralisme

Hukum: Implikasi Terhadap Manajemen Sumber Daya Alam Maluku (PidatoPengukuhan, 13 Agustus 2005). Ambon: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura.

Tom, Patrick. 2006. The Acholi Traditional Approach to Justice and the War inNorthern Uganda. Boulder, CO: The Beyond Intractability Knowledge BaseProject, University of Colorado. http://www.beyondintractability.org/case_studies/acholi_traditional_approach.jsp?nid=6792 (29.8.2007).

Tomagola, Tamrin Amal, Cornelis Lay, Lies Marantika, Ricky Palijama, Rosa Pentury & Yusup Madubun. 2008. Format Ulang Birokrasi Kota Ambon (Eddy O. S. Hiariej, ed.). Makassar: Ininnawa.

Tomsa, Dirk. 2009. Electoral Democracy in a Divided Society: The 2008 Gubernatorial Election in Maluku, Indonesia. South East Asia Research 17 (2): 229–259.

Trijono, Lambang. 2001. Keluar Dari Kemelut Maluku: Refleksi Pengalaman PraktisBekerja untuk Perdamaian Maluku. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Trindade, Jose. 2008. An Ideal State for East Timor: Reconciling the Conflicting Paradigms. February 2008. Dili. http://www.indopubs.com/An_Ideal_State_for_East_Timor.pdf (7.9.2011).

Trindade, Jose & Bryant Castro. 2007. Rethinking Timorese Identity as a Peacebuilding Strategy: The Lorosa’e – Loromonu Conflict from a Traditional Perspective. 6 June2007. Dili, Timor-Leste: EU/gtz. http://www.indopubs.com/Trindade_Castro_Rethinking_Timorese_Identity.pdf (15.2.2012).

Trisasongko, Dadang. 2003. To You I Belong. In I. Malik, M. Pattinaja, S. Putuhena, T. Yakob et al. (eds), Breaking the Violence with Compassion: BAKUBAE. Jakarta:Civil Society Alliance for Democracy (YAPPIKA), 89–95.

Trotha, Trutz von. 2004. In Search of Peace. History, Basic Narrative, the Future of War, and the Rise of the Local. An Introduction with a Short Overview of the Contributions. In M.-C. Foblets and T. v. Trotha (eds), Healing the Wounds: Essayson the Reconstruction of Societies After War. Oxford/Portland, OR: Hart, 1–12.

—— 2005. Der Aufstieg des Lokalen. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte (APuZ)28–29/2005: 32–38.

Tunny, M. Azis. 2007. Artists Labor to Change Maluku’s Image. The Jakarta Post, t13.2.2007.

Turner, Kathleen. 2006. Competing Myths of Nationalist Identity: Ideological Perceptionsof Conflict in Ambon, Indonesia. [Dissertation, Murdoch University, Perth]. http://wwwlib.murdoch.edu.au/adt/browse/view/adt-MU20060713.204930 (19.3.2008).

244 Bibliography

Turner, Victor. 1967. The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual. Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press.

Twikromo, Y. Arga. 2008. The Local Elite and the Appropriation of Modernity: A Casein East Sumba, Indonesia. [Dissertation, Radboud University, Nijmegen]. http://dare.ubn.kun.nl/dspace/bitstream/2066/73424/1/73424_locaelant.pdf (27.3.2010).

Uar, Eka Dahlan. 2005. Larvul Ngabal Sebagai Sistem Adat Dalam PenyelesaianKonflik Sosial di Maluku Tenggara. [Thesis, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta]

Ubink, Janine. 2011. Stating the Customary: An Innovative Approach to theLocally Legitimate Recording of Customary Justice in Namibia. Working Paper No. 8, International Development Law Organization (IDLO). http://www.idlo.int/Publications/WP2clarkstephens.pdf (2.11.2011).

Ubink, Janine & Benjamin van Rooij. 2011. Towards Customary Legal Empowerment: An Introduction. International Development Law Organization (IDLO). http://www.idlo.int/ (2.11.2011).

Ubink, Janine & Thomas McInerney (eds). 2011. Customary Justice: Perspectives on Legal Empowerment. Rome: International Development Law Organization (IDLO).

UN Children’s Fund. 2002. UNICEF Humanitarian Action: Indonesia Donor Update 19 November 2002. http://reliefweb.int/report/indonesia/unicef-humanitarian-action-indonesia-donor-update-19-nov-2002 (5.4.2013).

UNDP. 2000. Maluku Crisis: Umbrella Support Project for the Relief, Reconciliationand Recovery Strategy of the Government of the Republic of Indonesia. http://www.internal-displacement.org/8025708F004CE90B/(httpDocuments)/312FA65ECFD1F46B802570B70059400A/$file/UNDP_unmbrella_March_00.pdf (7.4.2007).

UNESCO. 1982. Mexico City Declaration on Cultural Policies. World Conference on Cultural Policies, Mexico City, 26 July–6 August 1982. http://portal.unesco.org/culture/en/files/12762/11295421661mexico_en.pdf/mexico_en.pdf (6.1.2014).

—— 2012. Culture: A Driver and an Enabler of Sustainable Development.Thematic Think Piece by the UN System Task Team on the Post-2015 UN Development Agenda. http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/post2015/pdf/Think_Piece_Culture.pdf (6.1.2014).

United Nations. 2007. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of IndigenousPeoples. http://www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/indigenous/declaration.htm(10.12.2007).

Vel, Jacqueline. 2008. Uma Politics: An Ethnography of Democratization in West Sumba, Indonesia, 1986–2006. Leiden: KITLV Press.

Villa-Vicencio, Charles & Erik Doxtader (eds). 2004. Pieces of the Puzzle: Keywordson Reconciliation and Transitional Justice. Cape Town: Compress.

Vollenhoven, C. van. 1905. Geen Juristenrecht Voor Den Inlander. http://ia600401.us.archive.org/24/items/geenjuristenrech00voll/geenjuristenrech-00voll.pdf (20.9.2012).

—— 1918/1931. Het Adatrecht van Nederlandsch-Indië. Eerste Deel, Leiden: Brill.—— 1928. De Ontdekking van het Adatrecht. Leiden: Brill.—— 1931. Het Adatrecht van Nederlandsch-Indië. Tweede Deel, Leiden: Brill.Waldorf, Lars. 2010. “Like Jews Waiting for Jesus”: Posthumous Justice in Post-

Genocide Rwanda. In R. Shaw and L. Waldorf (eds), Localizing Transitional

Bibliography 245

Justice: Interventions and Priorities After Mass Violence. Stanford, CA: StanfordUniversity Press, 183–202.

Warren, Carol. 2007. ‘Adat’ in Balinese Discourse and Practice: Locating Citizenship and the Commonweal. In J. S. Davidson and D. Henley (eds), The Revival of Tradition in Indonesian Politics: The Deployment of Adat from Colonialism to Indigenism. London/New York: Routledge, 170–202.

Wasonga, Joseph. 2009. Rediscovering Mato Oput: The Acholi Justice System andthe Conflict in Northern Uganda. Africa Peace and Conflict Journal 2 (1) June:27–38.

Weinstein, Harvey M. & Eric Stover. 2004. Introduction: Conflict, Justice andReclamation. In E. Stover and H. M. Weinstein (eds), My Neighbor, My Enemy:Justice and Community in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 1–26.

Werbner, Pnina. 1998. Exoticising Citizenship: Anthropology and the New Citizenship Debate. Canberra Anthropology 21 (2): 1–27.y

Widjojo, Muridan S., Adriana Elisabeth, Amiruddin, Cahyo Pamungkas & Rosita Dewi. 2008. Papua Road Map: Negotiating the Past, Improving the Present and Securing the Future. Jakarta: The Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI).

Widoyoko, Yoyok (ed.). 2008. The Wonderful Islands Maluku: Membangun KembaliMaluku Dengan Nilai-Nilai dan Khazanah Lokal, serta Prinsip EntrepreneurialGovernment, Beragam Potensi dan Peluang Investasi. Jakarta/Ambon: GibonBooks/Pemprov Maluku.

Wilhelm, Jürgen. 2011. Kultur als notwendige Dimension der Entwicklungspolitik.giz Brief 4 (Kultur und Entwicklung): 8–10. http://www.giz.de/de/downloads/fgiz2011-de-gizbrief04-gesamt.pdf (5.1.2014).

Wilson, Richard Ashby. 1997. Human Rights, Culture & Context: An Introduction. In R. A. Wilson (ed.), Human Rights, Culture & Context: Anthropological Perspectives. London/Chicago, IL: Pluto Press, 1–27.

—— 2006. Afterword to “Anthropology and Human Rights in a New Key”: The Social Life of Human Rights. American Anthropologist 108 (1): 77–83.t

Winn, Phillip. 2008. Butonese in the Banda Islands: Departure, Mobility and Identification. In P. Graham (ed.), Horizons of Home: Nation, Gender and Migrancy in Island Southeast Asia. Melbourne: Monash University Publishing, 85–100.

Woriwun, Lisa. 2003. Penobatan Raja Hulaliu di Pulau Haruku Momen RekonsiliasiAlamiah Pela-Gandong. 14 October 2003. Ambon: Maluku Media Centre.

Wouden, F. A. E. van. 1968. Types of Social Structure in Eastern Indonesia (EnglishTranslation by Rodney Needham). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

Young, Marion Iris. 1989. Polity and Group Difference: A Critique of the Ideal of Universal Citizenship. Ethics 99 (2): 250–274.

Zips, Werner & Markus Weilenmann, 2011. Introduction: Governance and Legal Pluralism – An Emerging Symbiotic Relationship. In W. Zips and M. Weilenmann (eds), The Governnance of Legal Pluralism. Wien/Münster: LIT, 7–34.

Zurbuchen, Mary S. 2005. Historical Memory in Contemporary Indonesia. In M. S. Zurbuchen (ed.), Beginning to Remember: The Past in the Indonesian Present. Singapore: Singapore University Press, 3–32.

Zurschmitten, Sabine. 2012. Kommerzialisierung, Inszenierung und Revital-isierung: Gegenwärtige Auseinandersetzungen um adat im Distrikt WesttManggarai (West Flores). ASIEN 123 (April): 28–47.N

247

Note: General topics of this volume such as reconciliation, culture, adat, conflict,tand peacebuilding, or places such as Indonesia and Maluku are not or only partlyindexed and not all occurrences are listed. In the Indonesian context, terms such as adat,t adat law, customary law or traditional justice can be used interchangeably, which also affects the index.

Index

access to justicein Maluku 89, 202in post-Suharto Indonesia 54, 55

Aceh (Indonesia) 19–20, 34, 40, 43,56, 131, 132, 183, 212

Acholi (Northern Uganda) 7, 34,194, 195

adatadat titles (honorary)t 130–31,

135–37, 138, 145and decentralization 49–50,

53–55, 62and democracy 176and positive peace 66and state law 47, 48, 90, 149,

180, 186, 191and the state 54, 55, 62, 152,

189–90and truth 45as colonial construction 46as divider 50as harmony 50, 57as holistic concept 135as invention 50as myth 46as peace force

(ambivalences) 118–20as peace force (limitations) 181as resource 51as social capital 50, 87as symbol for liberation 50authenticity 57codification versus

flexibility 43–49, 54, 62, 180–81

colonial government 44conflict resolution 56

continuity and change 46definition 43–44flexibility/adaptability 44, 46, 66,

96, 101, 145, 190, 197functionaries 64history 43–49insiders versus outsiders 50local specificities 134migrant–adat interfacet 160–70Moluccan conflict 77–78reinstallation as adat peoplet 34,

66, 105revival see revival of traditiontraditional justice 45–46weakening 65

adat istiadat see adatadat law see adatadat villages 53, 63–65, 151–52, 153,

162, 163, 167, 169, 212criteria 152immigration (Batumerah

Village) 162–63immigration (Honitetu

Village) 158–59, 164–65immigration (Kairatu Village) 167migrants’ status 163–64

adat–religion see religion–adatadministrative villages 53, 134,

151–52, 153, 168, 169agency see local agencyaggression theory 28agonistic pluralism 200AMAN (Aliansi Masyarakat Adat

Nusantara) 57–58, 149–51definition indigenous peoples

(masyarakat adat)tt 58Maluku 58

248 Index

ancestry (asal usul) 49, 62, 76, 99, 106, 128, 152

anthropologistsas knowledge broker 197as translators and mediators 208

anthropologyconflict and peace 28–30contributions xvii, xviii, 1, 27, 37deconstruction of reconciliation

toolkit 27ethnographic methods see

methodologyhuman rights 148–49indigenous peoples debate 57, 171relevance for peace studies 31–33revival of tradition 24–26symbols and rituals 33–35

anthropology of peace xvii, 182,205–8

Aru Islands (Maluku) 108, 133–34Asian values debate 22, 149Avruch, Kevin 12, 13, 183

baileo 64, 106, 108, 141, 152, 154, 155

baku bae 43, 110, 114BakuBae Legal Aid Institute

(LBH BakuBae) 89, 114BakuBae movement

beginnings 110criticism 113, 114–15neutral spaces 113pela (gandong) 113philosophy 110raja 112–13, 128–31revival of tradition 110–15siwalima 107, 113supporters 110–11survey 212underground 111workshops and other

activities 111–12Bali (Indonesia) 9, 40, 50Banda Islands (Maluku) 71, 215Banda Sail 141, 212Bartels, Dieter 73, 74, 103, 196, 213Basic Agrarian Law (BAL) 48Batumerah Village (Central

Maluku) 128, 162–63, 164, 214

BBM (Buginese, Butonese, Makassarese) 59, 72, 75–76, 80, 165, 173, 196

as second class citizens (Maluku) 165in post-conflict Maluku 165–66

Benda-Beckmann, Franz 165Benda-Beckmann, Franz and

Keebet 47, 151, 165, 174, 175Benda-Beckmann, Keebet 54, 120,

184, 214Bhinneka Tunggal Ika 47Burundi 6, 7Butonese migrants 107, 151, 165–70,

214, 215Banda Islands 215

cakalele 78Cambodia 4, 8, 198Certeau, Michel de xx, 208Chauvel, Richard 124citizenship 147–48, see also multiple

citizenshipand anthropology 176cultural 172, 174group-differentiated 169, 170–72,

174group-differentiated (criticism) 174group-differentiated

(Indonesia) 172–74group-differentiated

(Maluku) 173–74liberalism and its critics 170revival of tradition 187

civil emergency 72, 85civil society 15, 32

concept 13–14Coalition of Moluccan IDPs (KPM)

see Koalisi Pengungsi Malukucoexistence 7, 73, 74, 96, 199, 200collective identities 27, 34

de-essentalization 195instrumentalization 207integrative and exclusivist

potential 195intra-state violence xviireconstruction 153

collective rights 23, 147, 148, 164, see also human rights (cultural)

challenges 171–72

Index 249

conflict (Maluku) 70–80conflict resolution see peacebuildingconflict resolution (Maluku) 80–100conflicts (post-Suharto) 40, 55conflicts (Suharto era) 39, 40, 55Cooley, Frank 48, 63–65, 123, 124, 213cultural rights see human rights

(cultural)cultural turn in peace studies

definition xviioutline 11–37

cultureand change 18–19as capital (post-Suharto) 51, 56as obstacle to development 5, 26as social capital 15, 195–96as social capital (Maluku) 87, 116,

120in countries in transition 206misconceptions 1, 31power politics 12–13reification 13the rise of culture in peace studies/

peacebuilding 12–14UNESCO 18

Culture Institute of Maluku Region (Lembaga Kebudayaan Daerah Maluku, LKDM) 117

culture of violence 12, 76customary law 17, see also traditional

justice; adatand other normative orders 180,

184–89constructedness 18, 197contextuality 15, 18fostering 15incorporation into the formal

justice system 37, 184–85Indonesia 186institutionalization 18–20instrumentalization 19–20orality 16pragmatic pluralism 187self-recording 185–87

decentralizationadministrative partitioning

see pemekaranambivalences 49–52

and peacebuilding see peacebuildingand traditional leaders 23, 121contradictions 151customary and state law 186dealing with imbalances 202–3fragmentation 52–53implementation 152–53implementation (Honitetu Village)

52–53, 153–55implementation (Hutumuri Village)

65implementation (Latuhalat Village)

155implementation (Maluku) 61–62,

166in Indonesia 41–43integration of cultural outsiders

175laws (1999) 41laws (2004) 134migrants’ position 166–70of corruption 51, 202of the school curriculums 84reconstruction of history and

genealogy 153relationship adat and non-t adat

people 169revival of tradition 39, 50–51space for mutual accommodations

(local–state) 196traditional leaders see rajavillage categories (genealogical and

administrative) 151–52village level 49–50

democracyand indigenous organizations

198as good governance 42Indonesian-style 48local notions 54revival of tradition 187–88traditional leaders 132, 171Western notion 3, 4, 5, 120

displacement see refugees

Early Warning System for Conflict (EWSC) 115

East Timor xxi, 4, 8, 15, 16, 22, 24, 34, 37, 40, 41, 43, 54, 131, 161,

250 Index

East Timor – continued184, 185, 187–88, 193–94, 195, 202, 215, see also nahe biti

Commission on Truth andFriendship 20

Community Reconciliation Process (CRP) 19, 20

uma lulik 193–94era reformasi 39–40, 41–43, see also

decentralizationethnographic research xvii, xviii–xxii,

24, 27, 31, 32, 35, 37, 182, 206–7,208, see also methodology

ethnographyof Moluccan peace scape xixsites xix, xx

Flores (Indonesia) 43forgiveness 3, 4, 10Forum Latupati Pulau Haruku 94forum shopping 54, 184Freud, Sigmund 28Friendship Forum of Indonesian

Royal Houses 137Front Kedaulatan Maluku (FKM) 78,

85, 87

gacaca (Rwanda) 11, 20, 37, 183, 184, 185

Galtung, Johan 29–30, 36, 66, 182gandong 102, 103, 105, 113, 127,

see also pelaas conflict prevention 119

garap (Lombok, Indonesia) 43geneological villages see adat villagestGerakan Aceh Merdeka (GAM) 19

MoU (2005) 42Gerakan Perempuan Peduli (GPP) 99gotong royong (Indonesia)g 48, 103–4,

113group-differentiated rights

see collective rights; citizenship (group-differentiated)

Guatemala 8

hak ulayat 48, 50, 58Hatuhaha union (Central Maluku)

104–5, 128, 192–93Hobbes, Thomas 28

Hobsbawm, Eric 25Honitetu Village (Central Maluku)

52–53, 58, 153–55, 155–56, 158–59, 164–65

Hualoi Village (Central Maluku) 105,140, 158, 159, 201

hukum adat see adathuman nature 3, 5, 9, 27, 28, 32

Maluku 66, 105human rights 176–77

abuses 19, 20, 40and traditional justice 21–23cultural translation 153, 154,

176–77individual versus cultural

147–77law (Indonesia, 1999) 42masyarakat adat 58revival of tradition 187–88

human rights (cultural) 15, 23,147–49, 179

and democracy 176essentializations 148–49Indonesia 149–51, 176integrative and exclusivist

potential 180, 195human rights culture 3

Maluku 116Hutumuri Village (Central Maluku)

65hybrid identities 36hybrid justice 11, 17, 20, 36, 185hybrid peace 35–37, 198, 205, 208

definition 36hybrid polity 198hybridity 35–37

as participative concept 198local–liberal 32

identity transformation 11, 16, 34Maluku see Moluccan identity

inclusion of cultural outsiders see also revival of tradition

decentralization (Indonesia) 175dualism in Eastern

Indonesia 161–62MLM approach 163New Order approach 162–63village segments in Maluku 161

Index 251

independent team of investigators(Tim Penyelidik IndependenNasional, TPIN) 85, 91

indigenization of peace 198–99indigenous peoples

Central Maluku 150debate in anthropology 171, 206in Indonesia 148, 149–51, see also

masyarakat adatmovement 40, 57UN definition 57UNDRIP see UN Declaration on thee

Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007)Indigenous Peoples Alliance of the

Indonesian Archipelago see AMANIndonesian Constitution 47Institut Tifa Damai Maluku

(ITDM) 115, 141, 142, 155Institut Titian Perdamaian (ITP) 114,

115internally displaced persons (IDPs)

see refugeesinternational aid organizations in

Moluccan peacebuilding 81–84,93, 111

International Crime Tribunal (former Yugoslavia) 11

International Criminal Court (ICC) 3islah 20

Java (Indonesia) 40, 46, 48, 97, 211Jensen, Adolf Ellegard 103, 213, 214juridical landscape (this

volume) 189–90justice see access to justice; restorative,

retributive, traditional, andtransitional justice

subjectivity 202justice and law in post-Suharto

Indonesia 53–55justice and truth in Moluccan

peacebuilding 200–5, see alsopeacebuilding in Maluku

Kairatu Village (Central Maluku) 167–69Kalimantan (Indonesia) 50, 169, 173Kalla, Jusuf 90, 129, 130Kariu Village (Central Maluku) 94,

104–6, 107, 157, 192, 201

kastom (Melanesia) 13, 66Keesing, Roger 25Kei Islands (Maluku) 9, 58, 71, 81,

103, 108, 113, 118, 130, 186, 188, 215

keto ajaa (Acholi, Northern Uganda) 7kewang 64, 65, 132, 133, 155Klinken, Gerry van 73, 204Koalisi Pengungsi Maluku (KPM) 97,

158, 159–60Kupang (Indonesia) 56Kymlicka, Will 170–72, 174

LAIM (Lembaga Antar Imam Maluku)see Moluccan Interfaith Council

land issues 17, 45, 61, 63, 77, 89, 94, 105, 137, 139, 140, 158, 160, 162, 163–64, 165, 168, 169, 173, 181,190–91, 201

larvul ngabal (Southeast Maluku) 81,118

Laskar Jihad 72, 78, 79, 85, 91, 93, 111latu 212latupati 90, 112–13, 129, 134Latupati Council Maluku see Majelis

Latupati Maluku (MLM)law enforcement 3, 179

in Maluku 88–90LBH BakuBae see BakuBae Legal Aid

Institute (LBH BakuBae)Lederach, Paul 12, 81legal pluralism 54, 151, 170, 174,

180, 181, 184–89in Indonesia 189–93in Indonesia (history) 189strong 189weak 189

Leiden legacy 46–47Lembaga Musyawarah Desa

(LMD) 132, 162, 167–68liberal peace 4–5, 12, 14, 32, 36

complementation through indigenization 198–99

Liberia 14, 24, 30, 98, 212lineage (keturunan or mata rumah) 22,

50, 58, 63, 64, 78, 123, 124, 125,126, 132–33, 153, 154, 167

LKDM see Culture Institute of Maluku Region

252 Index

localagency 12, 30–33, 36, 47, 127,

197, 205as discursive space 198concepts of reconciliation 43culture as construction 13denial of agency 4misconceptions of the local 1, 12,

24, 31notions of democracy 42, 54notions of justice and

reconciliation 66redefinition 27reimagining the local–state

relation 206rise of the local in peacebuilding 1,

12, 15, 205, 208the everyday in peacebuilding 32,

205, 208the local xvii, 4, 35timing and tempo 41

local ownership 1, 13, 15, 40as invention 37

local wisdom (kearifan lokal) 83, 116,117

Lombok (Indonesia) 40, 43

Mac Ginty, Roger 4, 32Majelis Latupati Kota

Ambon 137–39Majelis Latupati Maluku

(MLM) 121–22adat–government interfacett

134–35, 145as construction 196as political instrument 135beginnings 128–29conflict prevention 139–40, 194constituting declaration 129–30criticism 141–42district councils 137–39government–masyarakat adat

interface 129head (Raja Mamala) 128, 142–44implementing

decentralization 144, 145installation of functionaries 130internal struggles 142–44localization of

democratization 145

masyarakat adat 163means for reintegration 121, 194mobile phones/Internet 140–41, 143predecessors 122representativeness 133–34,

142–44, 145Malino II see Malino peace agreementMalino peace agreement 66, 72, 85,

90–93, 105, 140, 160criticism 91post-Malino 92–93preparations 92socialization and resistance 91–92

Maluku see also Moluccan conflict; Moluccan identity; Moluccan Interfaith Council; Moluccan village leaders; peacebuilding in Maluku

background information 59–61conflict resolution 80–100current tensions 69–70implementation of

decentralization 61–62peace and reconciliation 65–67population statistics 210religion–adat 74–80traditional village

constitution 63–65Maluku Ambassadors for Peace

(MAP) 83, 97Maluku Media Center (MMC) 100, 112Maluku Reconciliation and

Reconstruction Meeting 96, 140,163

Manuputty, Jacky 84, 96–98, 108masohi 87, 113, 117masyarakat adat 54, 57, 58, 81, 86,

94, 116, 134, 135, 138, 143, 149,150, 152, 176, 190, 215

and migrants 160–70masyarakat asli 162, 167mato oput (Acholi, Northern Uganda)t

183, 195mauweng 64, 65, 77Mead, Margaret 28meka sareka (Lamaholot, Indonesia) 43methodology xviii–xxii, 206–7,

see also multi-sited and multi-temporal fieldwork; ethnographic research

processual approach xx

Index 253

migrants 110, 151, 173–75, 181, 187,190, see also adat villages; BBM;tButonese migrants; inclusion of cultural outsiders

as refugees 73, 155, 214exclusion 50, 103, 116Honitetu Village 164–65in the decentralization era

166–70integrative mechanisms 155land access in adat villagest 163–64,

165, 168migrant–adat interfacet 160–70,

191modernity see tradition versus

modernityMoluccan conflict 67, 70–80

adat 77–78analyses 73escalation 71–72instrumentalization of religion 74Laskar Jihad 72, 78, 85, 91, 93military and police 78–79military intervention 85mutual accusations between

Christians and Muslims 78phases 72provocateur theory 79–80refugees 155–60religion 77results 70–71root causes 190, 202statistics 72–73

Moluccan identity xix, 66, 75, 76, 84, 102, 107, 108, 110, 113, 115,119, 130, 182, 188, 201

Moluccan Interfaith Council 96–98, 192, 204

cultural dimension of reconciliation 96

setup and mission 96–97Moluccan village leaders see also raja

raja, patih, orang kaya 63–64Moluccas see MalukuMontagu, Ashley 28motambu tanah (Central Sulawesi,

Indonesia) 43Mouffe, Chantal 200Mozambique xix, 8, 30, 34mufakat 42, 48, 65

multiculturalism 117, 173multiple citizenship 170–77, 195

definition 174in Indonesia 174–75representational rights 175

multi-sited fieldwork xvii, xix–xxi, 206

multi-temporal fieldwork xvii, xix–xxi, 206

musyawarah 42, 48, 65, 88, 126

nahe biti (East Timor) 34, 43, 194, 195

Namibia 185–86, 186–87National Dialogue on Revitalizing

Local Culture for Rehabilitation and Development in the Moluccas towards a New Indonesia (Symposium Kei Island) 118–19

negeri 52, 63, 122, 126, 197, see also Perda Negeri

as cultural community 64ethymology 64history of the concept 47pemekaran 61return to 62, 64

negeri adat see adat villagestnegeri induk 52, 134, 168New Order see Orde BaruNGOs 58, 73

civil society 13–14NGOs (Moluccan peacebuilding)

54, 80, 81, 82, 83, 89, 93–94, 100, 110, 115, 141

Arikal Mahina (Smart Women) 99as knowledge brokers 153Baileo 62, 93–94, 154revival of tradition 51YPPM 94

non-truth 203, 212and reconciliation 67, 79, 182

Nordstrom, Carolyn xix, 30, 205, 211

criticism xixnormative orders see also customary

law; legal pluralismpeacebuilding in Maluku 189–90

North Maluku 50, 61, 71, 72, 74, 93, 156

254 Index

Nunusaku 103, 108–9, 150Nuremburg Trials 2

orang kaya 63, 123Orde Baru 48, 50, 51, 55, 57, 111,

118, 121, 124, 131, 138, 162–63,165, 167, 172

reconciliation 39

Pacific Islands 13pancasila 48Papilaya, Jopie (then mayor of Ambon

City) 138, 212Papua (Indonesia) 40, 52, 213Papua New Guinea 29paradigm shift in peace studies 1, 12,

14, 179, 197Passo Village (Central Maluku) 106,

107, 113, 128patih 63, 123, 212Peace Building Institute see Institut

Titian Perdamaian (ITP)peace concept (this volume) 28–30Peace Gong (gong perdamaian(( ) 86,

131, 204peace scapes xviii

creation 182, 195–96, 205ethnography xixMoluccan xx–xxi, 36

peacebuilding in Maluku 80–100, see also BakuBae Legal AidInstitute; BakuBae Movement; Culture Institute of MalukuRegion (LKDM); Early WarningSystem for Conflict; independent team of investigators; Institut TifaDamai Maluku; Malino peace agreement; Moluccan Interfaith Council; NGOs (Moluccanpeacebuilding); Peace Gong;revival of tradition; (non-)truth

access to justice 89, 202adat as peace forcet 118–20adat as peace forcet

(limitations) 181alternative articulations of

truth 204ambivalences of a revival of

tradition 119–20

award of honorary adat titlest130–31, 135–37, 138

corruption 202culture festivals 83daily interaction 199dealing with imbalances 202–3decentralization of the school

curriculums 84, 116, 212government 85–88informal justice 88, 89–90international aid

organizations 81–84, 93, 111international aid organizations

(critique) 84interreligious dialogue 96justice and truth 200–5land issues 201, see also land issueslaw enforcement 88–90media use 87mobile phones/Internet 140–41,

143Movement of Concerned Women

(GPP) 99National Dialogue on Revitalizing

Local Culture for Rehabilitation and Development in the Moluccas towards a New Indonesia (Symposium Kei Island) 118–19

neutral spaces 83, 100, 113normative orders 189–90,

see also legal pluralismoverview 80–81Pattimura (national hero) 102peace education 84, 117politik berimbang (balancing out)g

87–88post-conflict justice 181–82public spaces 100Radio Pelangi – The Reconciliation

Station 100reinvention of traditional leadership

see rajarevealing conflict narratives 203–4seminar on siwalima

philosophy 84Tiga Batang Air 102, 117, 211traditional alliances 102–5truth-seeking 203–5

Index 255

Wayame 107women and children 98–100workshop on the revival of local

wisdom 83peacebuilding in Southeast

Maluku 118–19peaceful societies 28–29, 205pela 73, 87, 101, 102–4, 105, 127,

128, 213adaptation and expansion 103,

181, 193, 196, 205as conflict prevention 119as pan-Moluccan concept 103BakuBae movement 113criticism 103gandong 102–3government 117Nunusaku religion 103reunification 109, 127

Pelauw Village (Central Maluku) 94,105, 106, 137, 192, 201

pemekaran 52Central Maluku 167Honitetu Village 52–53, 164–65Kairatu Village 168–69Maluku 61West Papua 52

Perda Negeri 62, 126–27, 132, 138, 139, 152, 155, 166–67, 169, 210,214, 215

Perneg 53, 62, 127, 152–53, 155,167, 169, 215

perpetrators 3, 6, see alsovictim–perpetrator

Peru 8, 33petuanan 152, 168peusijuek (Aceh, Indonesia) 19–20,

34, 43, 56, 183positive peace 9, 29, 66, 182provokator 73, 77, 79–80, 115, 212putra daerah 52

quantitative research xvii, 209

raja 64, 119, 152, 161, 213, see also Majelis Latupati Maluku

Amahusu Village 214and conflict prevention 89, 120and conflict resolution 139–42

as absolute rulers 123as interface government–masyarakat

adat 86as peace agents 111, 139as peace symbols 127–31as primus inter pares 122as symbols for brotherhood 141BakuBae movement 112–13Batumerah Village 162, 215colonial ethic policies 123–24colonial

instrumentalization 122–23criticism 141–42decentralization era 125–27dishonoring 142–44during Orde Baru 124–25feudal hierarchical system 131historical retrospective 122–27Honitetu Village 154–55Hutumuri Village 65implementing decentralization 62,

126–27, 132–33, 138–39in independent Indonesia 124inauguration as peace

event 127–28Indonesian independence

movement 124installation (Hulaliu

Village) 127–28installation (Sirisori Villages) 128installation (Sirisori Islam

Village) 106installation (Tulehu Village) 127interface with masyarakat adat 144inventive adaptation 144–45Kairatu Village 167–68Kariu Village 162, 163Latuhalat Village 155Mamala Village 128, 131, 135,

142–44murder (Hulaliu Village) 132–33Passo Village 114post-conflict 125–26power politics and

representation 131–37pre-colonial times 63revitalization 121–45status hierarchy (raja, patih, and

orang kaya) 123

256 Index

raja – continuedsuccession 125, 181, 187, 190, 213succession (decentralization era)

126–27the return of the 121–22title 63Tulehu Village 106, 128, 139,

141, 162raja council see Majelis Latupati

Maluku (MLM)raja council (district) 137–39

Ambon City 137–39raja council (subdistrict) see also

Forum Latupati Pulau HarukuHaruku Island 137Saparua Island 137

Ralahalu, Albert (then Moluccangovernor) 86, 87, 130, 135

Ranger, Terence 25, 210Rawls, John 5reconciliation 9–11

from below (Indonesia) 39, 40–41

in Maluku 65–67, see alsopeacebuilding in Maluku

local concepts 10, 43micropolitics 32terminology 10, 43, 209

reconciliation toolkit xvii, 4, 5, 11,14, 179

deconstruction 27Indonesia 80

Reconciling Indonesia: Grassroots Agency for Peace 40

refugees 71, 147, see also Koalisi Pengungsi Maluku (KPM)

challenging their return 157–59government approach 156–57Honitetu Village 155–56, 158–59international aid 82land issues 158, 201Malino peace agreement 91misappropriation of aid 159–60negotiating their return 155–60return enabled by adat 120statistics 73, 159–60

rekonsiliasi 43relationship-building 6, 11, 16, 30,

34, 43

religionand the state (Indonesia) 48,

189–90in Moluccan peacebuilding 96–98instrumentalization xvii, 59, 74,

77, 180religion–adat (Maluku)t 74–80,

189–90, 191–93arrival of world religions 74–75colonialism and independence 75disempowerment of adat 76interreligious violence and

harmony 76–77Islamization during the Orde

Baru 75–76reimagination in post-conflict

society 206Republik Maluku Selatan (RMS)

75, 78, 85, 87, 90, 111, 114, 115,124, 133

restorative justice 3, 5–9, 16, 21, 22, 34, 36, 45, 111, see alsotraditional justice

retributive justice 2, 5–9, 15, 45, 66, 181

revitalization of tradition see revival of tradition

revival of tradition xvii, xviii, 24–26,41, see also BakuBae movement

adat and politicst 191adat as peace forcet 118–20adjustment 145, 181, 182–84,

193–200ambivalences 180, 182and change 197and reconciliation 101–20as cultural capital 55criticism 101current issues 190–92decentralization 39, 50–51democracy 187–88economy, family ties and other

interdependencies 105–7equal citizenship 187exclusivism 164, 193for peace xviii, 59, 77for peace (ambivalences) 119–20for peace (limitations) 181government and scholars 116–18

Index 257

Honitetu Village 153–55human rights 187–88inclusion and exclusion of cultural

outsiders 160–66instrumentalization xviii, 194–95international organizations 83knowledge gaps 144land issues 190–91larvul ngabal 118Latuhalat Village 155legalization 49, 65, 196memory politics 66motivations 21negeri 47pela (gandong(( )gg 102–4representation and legitimacy 195return to orderly society

(beradab) 101siwalima 107–10social capital 196supporting factors 101traditional alliances

(pela, gandong, uli( ) 102–5transferability 193Uli Hatuhaha 104–5

Richmond, Oliver 4, 32, 205, 208rituals 11, 25, 33–35, 105, 127, 128,

196, see also mato oput; nahe biti; peusijuek

Rosaldo, Renato 172, 174, 210Rousseau, Jean-Jacques 28rujuk sintuwu maroso (Central Sulawesi,

Indonesia) 43Rwanda xxi, 6, 7, 8, 11, 15, 20, 37,

183, 184, 185, 216, see also gacaca

saniri 62, 64–65, 86, 89, 122, 123,126, 127, 132, 139, 152, 154, 155, 162, 163, 167, 213

ethymology 64SARA (Suku, Agama, Ras, dan

Antargolongan, ethnicity, religion,race, or class) 39, 55

Sen, Amartya 5Seriholo Village (Central Maluku)

158, 159, 201Sierra Leone 9, 16, 21Sirisori Islam Village (Central Maluku)

106

Sirisori Kristen Village (Central Maluku) 72, 85, 106, 157

Sirisori Villages (Central Maluku) 63,106, 128, 211

siwalima 107–10adaptation 181, 193, 205BakuBae movement 113challenges 109–10government 108, 116, 117Museum Siwalima 108mythical and historical

explanation 108–9pan-Moluccan concept 107–10philosophy 108workshop 84, 109–10

social capital 15, 50, 87, 116, 120, see also culture; revival of tradition

Somalia 98South African TRC 3, 7Southeast Maluku 71, 81, 103,

118–19, 133, 186, 188, 215Sponsel, Leslie 29, 30, 31Sri Lanka 30State of Eastern Indonesia (Negara

Indonesia Timor, NIT) 61stranger king 135structural violence 15, 27, 29, 30Sulawesi 40, 43, 59, 72, 90, 150, 166,

187Sultan of Yogyakarta 112, 130Sumba 44, 56summary (lessons learned) 179–82symbols 11, 25, 33–35, 50,

66, 103, 105, 108, 113, 127, 128, 130, 131, 141, 142, 154, 193, 198

Tanjung Priok (Jakarta, Indonesia) 20tapan holo (Lamaholot, Indonesia) 43Teitel, Ruti 2–3terra nullius 4, 46, 145, 183The Idea of Justice 5The Invention of Tradition 25Theory of Justice 5Tiga Batang Air (West Seram,

Maluku) 102, 117, 211TIRUS 80, 94, 110Tonkinson, Robert 25

258 Index

tradition xviii, 25–26, see alsoculture; revival of tradition

adjustment 35, 181, 193–200codification 26in peacebuilding xviiinstrumentalization 12invention xximisconceptions 1politics 26terminology 209versus modernity 5, 26

traditional justice 11, 14–16, 36, 43, see also customary law

adaptation 176adjustment 182–84and change 18–19and human rights 21–23, 54challenges 16–23characteristics 16, 210for sustainable peace 182–84Indonesia 40–41, 55instrumentalization 21, 56, 183rise of 14–15traditional means for conflict

resolution xviiitransferability 19–20, 53, 55van Vollenhoven 45–46

traditional leaders 23–24, 34, 62, see also raja

in post-conflict settings (Indonesia) 131–32

raja council see Majelis Latupati Maluku (MLM)

revitalization of traditional leadership (raja) 121–45

traditional village conflicts in Maluku 77, 137, 140–41, 142

traditional village constitution in Maluku 63–65

transitional justice 1, 2–4democracy 3from below 11overview 209post-Cold War 2–3rule of law 3the rise of culture in peace studies/

peacebuilding 12–14today 3–4

traditional justice 1, 21, 182, see also traditional justice

traditional leaders 23–24World Wars 2

transmigration 48, 50, 60, 75, 158, 161, 162, 164, 172, 173, 187, 211

Trotha, Trutz 12, 13, 205truth 1, 31

alternative articulations 203, 204in post-conflict Maluku 182subjectivity 45, 202

truth and reconciliation commission (TRC) see truth commission

Indonesia 42truth commission (TC) 2–3, 6–8, 179truth-seeking 3, 6–8truth-seeking in Maluku 203–5tuan tanah 64, 65, 78, 161, 163Tulehu Village (Central Maluku) 92,

105, 106, 127, 163Turner, Victor 25, 33

Uganda 7, 24, 34, 183, 194, 195, 210uli 63, see also Hatuhaha unionuma lulik (East Timor) 193–94UN agencies in Maluku 82UN Declaration on the Rights of

Indigenous Peoples (2007) 42,57, 148, 150

UN Transitional Administration in East Timor (UNTAET) 184

UN World Peace Day 86UNDP 82, 83, 84, 85, 89, 97UNESCO 82

culture concept 18UNICEF 82, 83, 84, 99, 100Universitas Pattimura 62, 72, 87, 89,

91, 100, 112, 117, 139, 186

van Vollenhoven, Cornelis 44–46,62, 145, 185

critique 46–47traditional justice 45–46

victim–perpetrator 3, 6, 8–9, 16, 41, 88

victimsas objects 6as part of collectives 45

Index 259

human rights 22lack of protection 20passivity 31restoration 16women 98

Village Law No. 5/1979 48–49, 124, 132, 133, 152, 213

annulment 49VOC (Vereenigde Oost Indische

Compagnie) 44, 61, 63, 122

war economy 71, 211war scapes 205

warzone ethnography xixWayame (Central Maluku) 107West Seram (Maluku) 166–70,

see also Honitetu Village; Kairatu Village

women and children in Moluccanpeacebuilding 98–100

Young, Marion Iris 170, 175Yudhoyono, Susilo Bambang

(SBY) 87, 90award of honorary adat titlet

130–31, 136