Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
9/11 to 26/11- The Creation of News spectacles
A case study of the ‘The Mumbai terror Attack 2008’
Dr. Sabina Kidwai
Associate Professor
AJKMCRC, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi-110024
Abstract
The turn of the Century has seen the growth of the media with a multiplicity of platforms. This
has brought about its own changes in the nature and delivery of new. News Spectacles have
become a way of reportage specially with the increasing terror attacks and natural disasters.
The paper looks at the creation of a News spectacle on Indian TV Channels using the Mumbai
Attack of 2008 as the case study. This, in real terms was the first News Spectacle in India as
the attack played out in front of the Television cameras for over 60 hours inspired by the media
frenzy which plagued USA after the terror attack of 9/11. Many issues are raised by the
coverage of this event, the constant use of symbolic images, the use of the present to talk about
the past and predict the future, and the prejudice which dominated when profiling a minority
community in India. Most importantly the visual display and emphasis given to the authenticity
of the image shook the foundation of ethical journalism. Questioning authenticity which we
often do now about Television News was missing in the year 2008.
Keywords: Muslim, terrorism, Mumbai attack, Spectacle, News, 26/11
Introduction
The increasing live broadcast at the turn of the century have added the element of a media
spectacle to any dramatic event, be it a terrorist attack or a War. The concept of the "society of
the spectacle" developed by French theorist Guy Debord and his comrades in the Situationist
International has had a major impact on a variety of contemporary theories of society and
culture. For Debord, spectacle "unifies and explains a great diversity of apparent phenomena".
"When the real world changes into simple images, simple images become real beings and
effective motivations of a hypnotic behavior. The spectacle has a tendency to make one see the
world by means of various specialized mediations (it can no longer be grasped directly),
naturally finds vision to be the privileged human sense which the sense of touch was for other
epochs…."1 (Debard 2013)
For Debord, the spectacle is a tool of pacification and depoliticization; it is a "permanent opium
war" which stupefies social subjects and distracts them from the most urgent task of real life -
Mukt Shabd Journal
Volume IX, Issue VII, JULY/2020
ISSN NO : 2347-3150
Page No : 2655
- recovering the full range of their human powers through creative practice. Debord’s concept
of the spectacle is integrally connected to the concept of separation and passivity, for in
submissively consuming spectacles, one is estranged from actively producing one's life.
However many scholars have refuted Debord totalizing effect of the spectacle. They feel that
the politics of the spectacle is far more ambiguous and unstable, subject to multiple
interpretations, and generate ambiguous and often unanticipated effects.
Douglas Kellner in Triumph of the spectacle talks about how “Media culture itself proliferates
ever more technologically sophisticated spectacles to seize audiences and augment their power
and profit….. New multimedia that synthesize forms of radio, film, TV news and
entertainment, and the mushrooming domain of cyberspace, become spectacles of
technoculture, generating expanding sites of information and entertainment, while intensifying
the spectacle-form of media culture. Political and social life is also shaped more and more by
media spectacle…. Social and political conflicts are increasingly played out on the screens of
media culture, which display spectacles like sensational murder cases, terrorist bombings,
celebrity and political sex scandals, and the explosive violence of everyday life.” 2 (Kellner
2013)
Douglas Kellner referring to the September 113 attacks on the U.S. talks about the relationship
between media spectacles of terror and the strategy of Islamic Jihadism that employs
spectacular media events to promote its agenda. A strategy also used by the U.S. administration
to promote U.S. military power and geopolitical ends, as is evident in the Gulf war of 1990-
1991, the Afghanistan war of fall 2001, and the Iraq war of 2003. “The 9/11 terror spectacle
unfolded in a city that was one of the most media saturated in the world and that played out a
deadly drama live on television. The images of the planes hitting the World Trade Center
towers and their collapse were broadcast repeatedly, as if repetition were necessary to master
a highly traumatic event. The spectacle conveyed the message that the U.S. was vulnerable to
terror attack, that terrorists could create great harm, and that anyone at anytime could be subject
to a violent terror attack, even in Fortress America. Suddenly, the vulnerability and anxiety
suffered by many people throughout the world was also deeply experienced by U.S. citizens,
in some cases for the first time.”4
A similar situation was perceived in India when the “Mumbai Attack” happened in 2008. A
news spectacle which came to be one of first terror attacks in Indian which was visually
photographed and played out on the screens for many years to come. But the attack happened
in the background of a changing India, an India in which we saw the secular fabric of the
country being gradually eroded by the constant surfacing of conflicting religious identities. The
80’s saw these conflicts enter the secular public sphere, while the 90’s saw the take over of
Mukt Shabd Journal
Volume IX, Issue VII, JULY/2020
ISSN NO : 2347-3150
Page No : 2656
this sphere by religious sectarian forces. The turn of the century also witnessed the emergence
new media technologies, and television news, making all issues into public debates. The
camera does not lie, the visual truth is the final truth, and that media coverage is ‘objective’,
were the bylines used by all Indian news channels to promote their stories. In these troubled
and conflicting times, images had come to acquire their own space and power. As identities
became more polarized, images and texts in the media also become more defined. One effect
of this news framework has been the perspective within which minorities, presented as ordinary
members of society has become increasingly overshadowed by a news perspective in which
they are presented as a problem. The Indian press has reported events around minorities
especially Muslims by taking them as an isolated community excluded from the mainstream of
society. Much of these biases have been drawn from the belief that Muslims all over the world
unite, loyal to their religion and community and not the nations they live in. Unfortunately the
bias and prejudice which dominated the United states of America in 9/11 came to dominate the
India television news channels in 2008 . Further there was already an increasing trend that
Television channels came to be owned by large corporates. Any perspective they adopted in
delivering a news story on terror attacks got played across all the platforms they owned. This
could vary from the TV channel to the monthly magazine to newspapers. A trend which had
started then and is now consolidated into some corporates controlling multiple channels in
different language and belonging to different region. Thus a spectacle was easier to play out as
it could be highlighted across platforms.
During the September 9/11 attack and in the period immediately after, a complex relationship
has developed between Media and terrorism. Dr John Huxford in “Surveillance Witnessing and
Spectatorship: The News and the War of Images”5 feels that today the image is as much a
weapon as a bullet or a bomb, with news serving as an effective delivery system. "In a world
of instant media, the signifier has become perhaps even more potent an instrument of war than
the acts it signifies. From the collapse of the twin towers to stories of Iraqi prisoner abuse and
terrorist executions, our newspapers, television screens and computer monitors have been filled
with images of the horrific and the grotesque”.
The Mumbai Attack 2008
The 2008 Mumbai terrorist attacks (often referred to as November 26th or 26/11 or India’s
9/11) was a series of more than ten attacks by armed gunmen in Mumbai by the Lashkar-e-
Taiba said to be allegedly sponsored by the Pakistani ISI. Over 174 people were killed and
308 were wounded. In brief the terror attack was carried out by trained gunmen who landed on
the shores of Mumbai spreading throughout the city targeting public spaces. After attacking
Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus (CST) and Leopold Café, the terrorists took hostages in two
hotels Taj Mahal Palace and Oberoi Trident Hotels and Nariman House (a Chabad Lubavitch
Mukt Shabd Journal
Volume IX, Issue VII, JULY/2020
ISSN NO : 2347-3150
Page No : 2657
Jewish Centre) . After a 2 day siege by the NSG commandoes, all the 9 attackers were killed
and the hostages rescued. (29th November 2008). Ajmal Kasab the lone surviving was arrested
and put on trial. Three important officers of the Anti Terrorist squad lost their lives. After a
trial, Ajmal Kasab was hanged on 21st November 2012. The study below was undertaken with
a detailed viewing of the private channels like Headline Today (India Today), NDTV, Aaj Tak,
CNN IBN, IBN7, Times Now and India TV. The private channels were chosen for the study
as it is often believed that they are far more independent in their reportage and not subject to
prejudice and bias.
The Mumbai attack was a landmark in the coming of age of live coverage of terrorist attacks
in India. The Indian channels reported each and every detail of the attack and it was like a
spectacle mediated to the audiences. “Witnessing trauma in urban spaces through live coverage
and instant updates constructs trauma as a space of global spectacle where trauma in urbanity
has become a television genre that constructs cities as vulnerable targets for both terror and
spectacle. The anti-Western and anti-Jewish sentiments of the attackers in Mumbai again
brought to fore the vulnerabilities of an interconnected world where chaos and carnage can
explode without warning in urban cities and spaces of spatial power.”6 (Ibrahim 2009)
The audiences were able to watch a minute by minute attack on their Television screens. The
Liveness of News today is a key shaper in the relationship between television and terror as it
is this which conveys to us the immediacy of the event, and makes us a part of the ongoing
tragedy, almost making us a witness to the event but also mediating the event for us.
The 60 hour siege in Mumbai ranging from 26 to 28th of November 2008, was followed by a
year long reporting by the channels. All channels used montages with dramatic headlines and
titles, and a visually aggressive style of reportage. All channels played out the terror attack like
a spectacle. The 24X7 coverage of the 60 hour seige threw up certain images which in years to
come became the iconic images to mark the Mumbai attack. All channels ran programmes
investigating the attack and how was it planned. Speculative theories started far much before
actual proof was found about the identities of the attackers. Once the identity of the attackers
was known speculations, communal hatred and anti Pakistan rhetoric took the centre stage.
Each channel carried out its own coverage of the spectacle, displaying its views through
graphics, montages and striking headlines as well as embedding itself into the event being
played out on the screen. The News Channel Aaj Tak called the attack “11/26 ‘Sabsa bada
atanki hamla’ (the biggest terrorist attack)”, the CNN IBN channel called its coverage “War
on Mumbai” while the Times Now called it “Mumbai under Seige”, NDTV called it “Warzone
Mumbai” and Headlines Today said it was “India’s 9/11 Mumbai’s date with terror”. The
Mukt Shabd Journal
Volume IX, Issue VII, JULY/2020
ISSN NO : 2347-3150
Page No : 2658
principal images of the coverage and montage were of Taj hotel burning, the car running at
night, the CST station burning, fire shots from windows, people running, visuals of the three
slain officers - Hemant Karkare, Ashok Kamte, and Vijay Salaskar. The captioning of the
montages played the attack out as a War against the Nation. It was an attack on India like 9/11
was an attack on the U.S. This also heightened the feeling that the attackers were the same,
‘young Muslim men brain washed into the Jihadist ideology’.
The spectaculisation of the attack was evident in the 24X7 coverage, the excited reports,
speculative theories, scenes mixed with terror date and timelines, the voices of the victims,
defence experts, war experts, terrorism experts, and the channels own investigations. And of
course the terrorists whose every movement, every photograph, every action guided the process
of the attack. The burning dome of the Taj Hotel became one of the iconic image to identify
the 26/11 Mumbai attack and this was projected across channels in different hues and colours.
The constant emphasis of 26/11 being India’s 9/11 sought to bring this image at par with the
flaming Twin towers. “The uncomfortable truth is that television journalism especially -- with
its penchant for the visually exciting and the dramatic -- is inevitably attracted to scenes that
create spectatorship, a fact that the media-savvy terrorist of the 21st century knows full well.
This was graphically demonstrated by the endless repetition of the twin towers image in the
weeks that followed 9/11. Such images failed to function as surveillance, since no new
information was supplied in the repetition. Nor could they be justified easily in terms of
witnessing, since the moment of history had been experienced and had passed. Yet the visual
stimulation of spectatorship remained, and could be re-experienced, in all its fascination and
terror, with each repetition” (Huxford 2004). In the case of the Mumbai Attack the image of
the burning Taj Mahal Palace Hotel dome, the images of the armed terrorists continued to be
symbolic of the attack even today.
The set of the anchors plays a major role in placing the channel within the event itself. Visual
display of images with high tech graphics and corporate like presentations almost structured an
event to the needs of the channel and its campaign. Each channel by its sheer studio setup
asserted ownership of the event. The event was almost brought to the studio, making the
channel the medium of communicating to the audience. The anchors worked as the embedded
war journalists reporting from the site twisting every information in accordance with their
ideological belief. They all claimed that they were the first with the news, getting the audience
right, current and objective news. Building on fears of the past, the present was used to predict
an even more dangerous future. This became particularly true after the actual attack was over
and terrorist were identified as being Pakistani in origin. Most reporters in the initial phase of
attack were so mesmerized by the burning image of Taj Hotel that they forget to look at the
tragic death of people at the CST station. In fact once the siege ended and the terrorists were
Mukt Shabd Journal
Volume IX, Issue VII, JULY/2020
ISSN NO : 2347-3150
Page No : 2659
killed many channels ran stories on the destruction of the Taj Mahal Palace hotel and how the
rich and famous had lived here. The historicity of the building took over the actual death of the
people. Many celebrities were called on air to voice their views on the luxurious hotel and its
fine dining.
“The Indian media was transfixed by the rising tide of horror that breached the glittering
barricades of "India shining" and spread its stench in the marbled lobbies and crystal ballrooms
of two incredibly luxurious hotels and a small Jewish center. We're told that one of these hotels
is an icon of the city of Mumbai. That's absolutely true. It's an icon of the easy, obscene injustice
that ordinary Indians endure every day. On a day when the newspapers were full of moving
obituaries by beautiful people about the hotel rooms they had stayed in, the gourmet restaurants
they loved (ironically one was called Kandahar), and the staff who served them, a small box
on the top left-hand corner in the inner pages of a national newspaper (sponsored by a pizza
company, I think) said, "Hungry, kya?" ("Hungry eh?"). It, then, with the best of intentions I'm
sure, informed its readers that, on the international hunger index, India ranked below Sudan
and Somalia.” (Roy 2008)7
The Look of the young terrorist was another image which was played out again and again on
all channels. The fact that the young men were disguised to appear as middle class young boys
was used to emphasize the deviousness of ‘young Muslim Men’ in fooling the ’innocent
believing common man’. The channel Star News ran a program which decided to show us the
face of Terrorism – The first face is described as a young smart boy, in his bag he carries the
”Mauth ka saman” (Luggage of Death) and in his hand he carries the deadliest gun. He wear
“kafi thaila wala pant” (Pant with many pocket), he looks like a tourist but is actually the
messenger of Death, “yeh lagta hai salani but hai yeh Yamdoot”8. CNN IBN ran a program
titled “Face of terror in their 20’s carrying automatic weapons”. The reporters in Aaj Tak
talked about how Kasab is just 21 years old, his skin colour is fair. At the time of the attack he
was wearing a blue coloured designer T shirt and cargo pants. He was wearing these clothes so
that he would look like a young rich boy. “Look at his hands he is carrying an AK 47, on his
back he carries the luggage of destruction and if you look at his eyes they are vicious, evil and
full of hatred. He has the look of a wolf. Terrorism has made Kasab a man hater a maniacal
killer. The moment he sees a human being he starts killing. When you look at them they are
well dressed aware of the ways of the world, their hair is well cut, they belong to our modern
world.”. 9 The use of CCTV footage was also a consistent factor in the months after attack as
each channel tried to track down the route and process of the attack. In fact here it is important
to mention that the tragic death of three officers was replayed by all channels with attempts at
recreation of the events. But no new information about their death was revealed except that
they were gunned down by the terrorist Ajmal Kasab. The important part of this ongoing
Mukt Shabd Journal
Volume IX, Issue VII, JULY/2020
ISSN NO : 2347-3150
Page No : 2660
spectacle was that the information we had as audiences was still the same even though we
watched the action for many months after the actual attack.
The portrayal of these terrorists was also significant in the wake of the tension which had been
built up over the period of 2007 and 2008 when a group Indian Mujahideen had surfaced
claiming responsibility for the attacks in various cities of India in 2007. The arrests of many
young men had already built up the prejudice that most terrorist today were ‘young educated
Muslim men’. The TV reports had extensively profiled some of the arrested men, so the 26/11
attackers were quickly identified as young and Muslim and subsequently the Pakistani tag was
attached. More importantly after the Mumbai attack the suspicion of young Muslim men
became even more pronounced. All channels while carrying out the live coverages also carried
out investigations into the possibilities of insiders having helped in making the attack possible.
This helped in casting a large net of suspicion on the Muslim community in Mumbai. A city
which has already seen its share of terror attacks, with a large floating migrant population, a
city which absorbs the migrant but also rejects them simultaneously. It is also city with a large
underworld.
Each channel embedded itself into the story by highlighting the stories of victims. The victims
not only communicated to the channel but the channel became the means of communication
between loved ones. In fact since a minute by minute coverages was being done by the news
channels, that often the strategies adopted by the NSG were exposed and the handlers were
actually using the Indian channels to monitor the Attack. One speculation always remained that
the over reporting had made the terrorist kill some of the hostages in Nariman house in panic,
as the NSG commandoes carried out the evacuation process.
All channels started their own campaigns to assert ‘loyalty to the nation’, to reflect their
sympathy and concern for the victims, to represent the citizen’s voice against terror. One of
the most popular campaign was the NDTV campaign “In Memory”10 and was symbolized by
a flame. The campaign montage used a song from the film Aamir. “Ghardisho mai rehti
guzarti, zindigaiya hai kitne, in mai se ek hai teri meri apni, eh khuda khar kare, eh sa anjaan
jaha, ek muskarata chodh chala wakat se pehle yeh jaahan. Ek Lau is taarah kyu bughi mera
maula, ek lau zindagi ke”. (Life goes through many cycles and in one of them is yours and my
story. God please protect us, as we see this young man leave this world much before his time.
Why should a flame of life die so easily, Why God.) The song sought to evoke the tragedy of
terrorism which wipes out life. Ironically the film Aamir is about a liberal Muslim who gets
caught in a terrorist plot and finally gives up his own life rather than execute the attack. The
channel in support of the victims uses a song which mourns the death of the innocent but also
mourns the death of the liberal voice specially the liberal Muslim voice. The campaign added
Mukt Shabd Journal
Volume IX, Issue VII, JULY/2020
ISSN NO : 2347-3150
Page No : 2661
a huge emotional appeal to the War against Terror. The musical tribute ‘In memory’ brought
together singers from all over the country who paid their homage to the innocents who died in
the attack. The onscreen were carried out into the field through candle lit marches with the title
“Enough is enough”11 in which people came together to demand security from the government.
Debates and discussions on the channel allowed many of the elite to vent their feelings about
the politicians and their inefficiency. Often they also became the stage for many prejudices to
surface. The views of the people were highlighted through programmes like ‘We the People’–
Anatomy of Anger – Can civil society bring real change? Is the elite to disconnected from
reality? 12 All this did help in allowing people to bring out their anger. It also brought a clear
divide between the elite and the common man. The channel made attempts to bridge this gap
but very often the celebrities did take over the discussions.
Headlines Today carried out a campaign “War on Terror”13 drawing from the American War
on terror. It sought to adopt a more hard hitting coverage based on facts and the need for hard
action by the government. Emotions were charged with the need for War, war against an enemy
and that every citizen must be a part of this war on terror. No opinion contrary to the
‘nationalistic one’ was acceptable. The campaign involved largely discussions with war experts
and policy makers and sought to engage the youth through debates. The image of the clenched
fist sought to portray the message that we as Indians are ready to fight. It appealed to all Indians
to unite against a common enemy ‘terrorism’. In the weeks to come this acquired a clear face
’Muslim men and Pakistan’. The spectacle continued to play out for long time on this channel
with the discovery of what the channel called ‘Terror Tapes’ which were recordings of the
conversation between the terrorist and their handlers. Ultimately it died down to be replaced
by the trial of the lone surviving terrorist Ajmal Kasab. Tapes Don’t Lie – ‘Voices of terror’
is the ticker which runs through the programme. The anchor introduces the programme as to
how the Pak handlers advice terrorist on how to kill efficiently. The anchor talks about how
the terrorist were not only well trained but they had also been taught how to engage with the
media.14 The tapes played back as an HT exclusive sought to build panic and fear. The anchor
says “the masters smile across the border as the terrorist spill the blood of innocent victims and
celebrate massacre unleashed”.
Ajmal Kasab the lone surviving terrorist also became the symbol the Mumbai attack. In the
months that followed his trail, his confessions, his vacillations, his anger, his appeal were all
reported in great detail by the media. He came to symbolize all that was bad about Pakistan.
He became the face of Pakistan, the face of terrorism. After the initial photographs of the two
terrorist at CST, Kasab after his arrest, image of Kasab in court room became the base visual
material for all the television reports. The trail of Kasab was a spectacle played out in the
theater of television with all anchors, experts and ‘aam admi’ asking for his death. Kasab ”the
Mukt Shabd Journal
Volume IX, Issue VII, JULY/2020
ISSN NO : 2347-3150
Page No : 2662
lone surviving terrorist”’ of 26/11 became the most important face on television. As Kasab’s
confessions hit the television screen all channels started exploring his Pakistani links. The
channels also went into their own analysis of the plans which were hatched in Pakistan and
how the terrorists are being protected. The limited visuals of Kasab were supplemented by
sketched out sequences which always showed the Pakistani handlers in clerical dress. A clear
visual of a religious Muslim is communicated through all the recreations. A fanatical ideology
can only be propagated by a religious looking Muslim. So to some extent inspite of the debates
about representation and stereotypes, many channels went back to using the Muslim cleric as
the best representative of the fundamentalist Muslim. All channels carried their basic Terror
timeline and constant repetition sought to be a reminder of those horrific 60 hours of siege.
Each channel gave its own repetition of the siege, somewhere reclaiming the incident to the
exclusivity of its own channel. The events of 26/11 had many story tellers each claiming the
story to itself and adding its own version of investigation and debate. Confessions of Kasab
were closely linked with views on Pakistan and the channels launched a clear media blitz
against Pakistan, with all channels anticipating a War. The important point is that often the
attack on Pakistan and on Kashmir inevitably aggravates prejudices against local Muslims. The
spectacle of the trial allowed Kasab to play out all the various ideological motivations he felt
for the cause. In our desire to prove Pakistan wrong, the channels gave immense publicity to
views of the LeT through Kasab. The motives behind the attack were a little unclear. The
attack was audious and sought to create chaos and fear was evident but the actual motive could
not be focused on. The actual motives varied from wanting to take foreign guest hostage, to
highlighting the Kashmir agenda, to revenging the ill treatment of Muslims, to killing the Jews
missionaries in Nariman House, these can however only be speculated on and all channels
indulged in these speculations. The Headlines Today story focused on Kashmir as the main
agenda, an agenda which justified the involvement of Pakistan ISI and terrorist organizations
like the Lashkar-e-Taiba. Much of this reading was true but it was based on confessions of
Ajmal Kasab supplied by the police recordings. The use of police recordings of confessions of
terrorists was not a new device, throughout 2007 we saw that many of the channels like Aaj
tak, IBN 7 India TV carried programmes which re-enacted the transcripts of confessions of
arrested terrorists. In many cases there were no actual interviews with the arrested person but
their voice and person was re-enacted . Even narco tests were shown as re-enactments .
Pakistan was a major media story post 26/11 and an even bigger story for the channels were
the Taliban and the emergence of Talibanised terrorism in Pakistan. “Pakistan was a failed
State’. “the Taliban army was reaching Islamabad” were common statement on all the
television channels. It is in the projection of the Taliban we see the coming together of the
media and terrorism in an unprecedented scale. The media in its condemnation of Pakistan gave
the Taliban unprecedented publicity. However the Indian media in its keenness to blame
Mukt Shabd Journal
Volume IX, Issue VII, JULY/2020
ISSN NO : 2347-3150
Page No : 2663
Pakistan, acts of barbarism were shown with continuous repetition, used to creating a horror of
the advancing Taliban. A threat which was also endangering India as Pakistan was not really
stopping this advancing army and was insidiously using it against India. The chief conspirator
in the attacks on India was the ISI, the intelligence agency of Pakistan. Most of these reports
on the rise of the Taliban appeared in the period after the Mumbai attack December 2008 to
May 2009.
The importance of the Liveness of News was that it made the whole event into an ongoing live
drama which the audiences could watch from the sidelines, sympathise and emotionally relate
with from the safety of their homes. It also made it evident that news could be manipulated
and the channel could clearly decide what should be reported and how. In fact what got left out
indicated the journalistic bias of the channel. The playing out of events in front of television
screens allowed the News channels to not only give a detailed visual coverage but also make a
spectacle of the events which followed. In the following months this kind of spectaculisation
of events can be seen in the coverage of the attack on the Cricket team in Pakistan which got
titled Cricket vs Terror, the Rise of the Taliban in Pakistan, the killing of Osama Bin Laden
etc.
Today we have got so used to News spectacles on channels that they have become the norm,
every story is played out like a spectacle. It may a terror attack or a natural disaster specially if
it has the eye catching visuals of the actual event being caught on camera. This has led to a
gradual dehumanization of news ignoring all the accepted norms of decent and fair coverage.
Showing murder and mayhem on channels is no longer barred and its play happens across
platforms forcing audiences to be part of the news spectacles and become fixated with its
progress. But equally we find that audiences have an increasing short term memory allowing
stories to disappear from TV screens. Channels today survive on negativity and no spectacle
sells more than a negative one. Today the efforts to be unbiased is not even made and the
spectacle has become the major device to manipulate audiences.
Mukt Shabd Journal
Volume IX, Issue VII, JULY/2020
ISSN NO : 2347-3150
Page No : 2664
Screen Shots of the some of the images of News stories referenced in the Article
CAPTIONING THE ATTACK
ICONIC IMAGES OF THE TAJ HOTEL
Mukt Shabd Journal
Volume IX, Issue VII, JULY/2020
ISSN NO : 2347-3150
Page No : 2665
AAJ TAK - FACES OF THE TERRORISTS
SETS FOR THE ANCHORS
1 Deobard Guy quoted in KellnerDouglasMedia Culture and the Triumph of the Spectacle,
http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/essays/mediaculturetriumphspcetacle.pdf, accessed last on 10.4.2013,p
2
2 Kellner Douglas, Media Culture and the Triumph of the Spectacle,
http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/essays/mediaculturetriumphspcetacle.pdf, accessed on 2.4.2013, p 1
3 9/11 – The September 11 attacks (often referred to as 9/11)nwere a series of four coordinated terrorist attacks by
the Islamic terrorist group al-Qaeda against the United States on the morning of Tuesday, September 11, 2001.
Four passenger airliners which had departed from airports in the northeastern United States bound for California
were hijacked by 19 al-Qaeda terrorists. Two of the planes, American Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight
Mukt Shabd Journal
Volume IX, Issue VII, JULY/2020
ISSN NO : 2347-3150
Page No : 2666
175, crashed into the North and South towers, respectively, of the World Trade Center complex in Lower
Manhattan. Within an hour and 42 minutes, both 110-story towers collapsed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks
4 Kellner Douglas, 9/11, Spectacles of Terror, and Media Manipulation: A Critique of Jihadist and Bush Media
Politics
http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/essays/911terrorspectaclemedia.pdf, accessed on 2.4.2013p 3
5 Huxford Dr John, Surveillance Witnessing and spectatorship: The news and the war of Images,
http://www.media-ecology.org/publications/MEAproceedings/v5/Huxford05.pdf, Villanova University
Proceeding of the Media Ecology association Volume 5, 2004, p 1,last accessed 1.4.2013
6 Ibrahim Yasmin, City Under Siege: Narrating Mumbai Through Non Stop Capture, Culture Unbound, Vol 1, 2009, p 386, http://www.cultureunbound.cp.liu.sc d 7 Roy Arundhati, The Monster In The Mirror, Outlook, Concurrents.org
8 27th Nov 2008 Star News 9 Aaj Tak 27th Nov 2008
10 NDTV 13 Dec 2008
11 NDTV 30th Nov 2008
12 NDTV 14th Dec 2008
13 Headlines Today 22 Dec 2008
14 Headlines Today 28th Feb 2009
References
1. Devji, Faisal Fatehali, 1992. Public Culture, Bulletin of the Society for Transnational Cultural Studies
Volume 3 No.1. Fall
2. Dines Gail & Humez Jean M Editors 1995. Gender, Race and Class in Media. Sage Publications
3. Dobkin, Bethami A 1992. Paper Tigers and Video Postcards: The Rhetorical Dimensions of Narrative
Form in ABC News Coverage of Terrorism. Western Journal of Communication
4. Engineer Asghar Ali 1997. Indian Islam and the Politics of Reform Movements in post Independence
India. Women Living under Muslim Laws-Dossier 20
5. Farooqui Athar, Editor 2009. Muslims and Media Images. Oxford
6. Hasan Zoya, Editor 1994. Introduction to Forging Identities, Gender, Communities and the State. Delhi:
Kali Publication
7. Hindustan Times 2009. 26/11 The attack on Mumbai. Penguin Books
8. Hoskins Andrew and O’Loughlin Ben 2009. Television and Terror, Conflicting Times and the Crisis of
News Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan
9. Huxford Dr. John 2004. Surveillance, Witnessing and Spectatorship:The News and the ‘War of Images’.
Villanova University Proceedings of the Media Ecology Association, Volume 5, http://www.media-
ecology.org/publications/MEA_proceedings/v5/Huxford05.pdf
10. Ibrahim, Yasmin 2009. City Under Siege: Narrating Mumbai Through Non-Stop Capture, Culture
Unbound, Volume 1, http://www.cultureunbound.ep.liu.s
11. Kellner Douglas, Media Culture and the Triumph of the
Spectacle,http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/essays/mediaculturetriumphspectacle.pdf
12. Kellner Douglas, 9/11, Spectacles of Terror, and Media Manipulation: A Critique of Jihadist and Bush
Media Politics, http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/essays/911terrorspectaclemedia.pdf
13. Mamdani Mahmood 2004. Good Muslim Bad Muslim, Islam, the USA, and the Global war against
Terror, Permanent Black
14. Roy Arundhati. The Monster In The Mirror. Outlook. Concurrents.org
15. Said Edward 1981. Covering Islam: How the media and Experts determine how we see the rest of the
world. New York: Pantheon Books
Mukt Shabd Journal
Volume IX, Issue VII, JULY/2020
ISSN NO : 2347-3150
Page No : 2667