Roy G. Callahan, USN, Ret.

1529 NW 143rd StreetGainesville, Florida 32606

Tel: (352) 332-9144Fax: (352) 332-9144

call6603@bellsouth.net

Monday, September 7, 2015Representative Ted Yoho511 Cannon House Office BuildingWashington, D.C. 20515

Dear Representative Yoho:

Article 1, Section 1, says, “All legislative powers shall be vested in the Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives” yet Congress permits a black robed Marxist parroting the Supreme Court’s1 war on religion2 to

Deign it his responsibility, To obey an illegal pronouncement by the Supreme Court in Obergefell v. Hodges That Homosexual Marriage is a right granted by the 14th Amendment and Requires him to incarcerate Kim Davis, a County Court Clerk elected and employed by the sovereign state of Kentucky3 for her refusal to issue marriage licenses to anyone so as not to discriminate because her religious beliefs forbids issuing licenses to same sex couples.

This is not the first time Congress has remained silent when the Court imposed its agenda by abusing its authority using the 14th Amendment. Congress remained silent in Roe v. Wade (1973) abortion4 and Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) same-sex marriage. The same holds true regarding birthright citizenship.5 Senator Ted Cruz, Mark Levin, Donald Trump, Senator Sessions, and Governor Scott Walker are correct.6 There is no record that congress 7 has passed laws allowing birthright citizenship or homosexual marriage. Both decisions are invalid. Contextually, it is worth noting Senator Jacob Howard (R-MI) the author of the 14th Amendment statement was succinct regarding citizenship. His intent to was to make recently freed (emancipated) blacks whole only.

Every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction is, by virtue of natural law and national law, a citizen of the [United States]. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers, accredited to the government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.”

1(Federalist #78) “The judiciary, from the nature of its functions, will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution; because it will be least in a capacity to annoy or injure them. The Executive not only dispenses the honors but holds the sword of the community. The legislature not only commands the purse but prescribes the rules by which the duties and rights of every citizen are to be regulated. The judiciary, on the contrary, has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatever. It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments.2 “religion is the opiate of the people”3 10th Amendment the powers not delegated in the Constitution to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively or to the people.4 Fundamental rights found in the UN Charter but not the Constitution of the United States.5 U.S. v Wong Kim Ark 169 US 649 (1898)6TThis problem dates back to Marbury v. Madison when congress allowed the Supreme Court to usurp the authority inherent in the people’s house the first time. 7 The peoples’ representatives.

Page 1 of 3

Therefore, it is obvious that RINO’s like Jeb Bush who deem violating our immigration laws “an act of love” and courts that prefer to do end runs around the Constitution rather than enforce it must be resisted.

The remedy to this problem is simple. Article III, Section 1 states “The Judges, both of the Supreme and Inferior Courts shall hold their offices during good behavior.”8 U.S. District Judge David Bunning illegally used the power of government to incarcerate Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis for contempt of an illegal opinion of five Marxist judges hell bent on destroying the fabric of American culture. Ms. Davis’ only sin was citing her beliefs as an Apostolic Christian and her inability to discern where the Constitution requires her to issue licenses to any couple, gay, or straight. Therefore, it is time to impeach Judge Bunning.

I gave you impeachment documents drafted by the North American Law Center dealing with Obama’s illegal presidency the last time we met. You chose not to act on them citing current members of Congress told you “previous administration and Congresses have not acted on official lawlessness; this Congress is not going to be the first.” You also authored legislation defining impeachment. The rule of law garbage one hears from news pundits and politicians is a joke and everyone knows it. Judge David Bunning committed an impeachable offense by incarcerating Mrs. Davis without cause. Congress has the power to hold him accountable and must do so. It is time to reverse this trend.

The Davis case is an injustice that shocks the conscience of “freedom loving Americans.” The courts are corrupt 9and the ballot box is not working leaving freedom loving Americans one other alternative left to maintain their freedom: – the cartridge box so many corrupt politicians try to diminish and denigrate by ignoring the “shall not be infringed” in the second amendment. The founders gave us the Second Amendment for a reason – Judge Bunning’s action is one of those reasons that will lead to further abuse if allowed to stand. I do not believe you want to go there.

The people of the Third Congressional district sent you to Congress to honor your oath to the Constitution, uphold the rule of law, and work for them. Authoring legislation/articles to impeach Obama and Judge Bunning upholds the rule of law.

I have listened to you and other members of Congress thanking current and former members of the armed services for their service. Like you, we took the same oath the difference being, service members signed a blank cheque that included death and dismemberment. I have served with and seen many of my fellow service members give their all for this country and its Constitution. I refuse, in conscience, to allow judges like Bunning to dishonor their sacrifice and let acts like this go unanswered. The Davis case points to the fact that Congress must give meaning to “Thank you for your service.” This is what I expect you to do.

Looking forward to your reply, I remain,

Yours in the Bill of Rights,

Roy G. Callahan Cuban Missile Crisis/Vietnam Veteran (Devil Dog)Retired Investigator, Public Defender’s Office, 8th Judicial CircuitLifelong oath keeper.

Cc: Judge David BunningUnited States District Judge US District Court

8 The Good Behavior Clause of Article III is the foundation stone for the independent judiciary in the American tripartite system of government. In a system designed to protect against tyranny of both the majority and the minority, the clause is a constitutional contract with those men and women who serve in the judiciary—a contract that can be rescinded only through an act of im-peachment.9Judge Bunning proves it.

Page 2 of 3

35 West 5th Street Covington, KY 41011

Florida Legislature; Florida Congressional Delegation; Rep. Candidates Donald Trump and Mike Huckabee, Governor of Kentucky; Senator Cruz and Paul et al

Page 3 of 3