User Guide#QuestionY*NN/ARYGEvidenceActions RequiredResponsibleOpen DateDue DateStatus%Actual End Date123456789101112131415X25%N/ADeliverable RYG RatingIP50%Location: / Site:75%RRed: Some questions have a negative answer and no recovery plan is in place or the plans identified will have an impact in program timing. Support is required. When an item is highlighted Red an assessment on the impact to the WP timing needs to be provided.Reviewed by:Status (%):25% - Action Identified 50% - Owner Identified100%YYellow: Some questions have a negative answer but a recovery plan is in place which will prevent impact on timingReviewed with:75% - Action in Progress 100% - Action ClosedGGreen: All questions have a positive answer (Y) and are ongoing normal program developmentDate :

&"Arial,Bold"&20 User Guide

The questions are used to evaluate the quality of the deliverable attached to the element. Typical aspects of the deliverable to be evaluated through the questions are:1. Quality/availability of the inputs needed to build the deliverable 2. Cross-functional approach to answer the deliverables3. Quality /conformity to a standard if any or to best practices 4. control of the outcome of the deliverable (e.g. action plan)

Input evidence of the answer to the question (e.g.: document reference) here. If an "X" is in the preceding N column (column D) then describe the issue here including root cause in order to identify proper actions .Actions identified based on the root cause described in the Evidence column when the RYG column is Red or Yellow.These are typical action management milestones . The due date should be aligned with the closure date of the deliverable as planned in the APQP timing. In cases where the due date is not aligned with APQP timing, the RYG status is most likely Red .Date of revision for the provided status and personnel involvedY* - Put an "X" if complete and is OK or "IP" if in-progress as planned.N - Put an "X" if it is Not OK .N/A - Put an "X" if you have agreed with your customer that this question is Not Applicable.RYG - Put an "R" here if the answer to the question is not acceptable and there is no recovery plan. Put a "Y" here if there are problems with the question but is recoverable with an action plan inplace. Put a "G" if it is on track or satisfactorily complete. When you put an "R" or "Y" you will need to complete the "Actions Required" and subsequent columns.

2.01 DFMEA#QuestionY*NN/ARYGEvidenceActions RequiredResponsibleOpen DateDue DateStatus%Actual End Date1Have Engineers been trained in the industry accepted DFMEA methodology?2Have best practices from similar part DFMEA's been condsidered?3Have all functional requirements been included and evaluated in the DFMEA?4Does the DFMEA reflect the latest design solution?5Is the DFMEA managed as a living document that is updated with each design modifications?6Are actions for handling high RPNs clear?7Are CTIs and KCs identified for high RPNs that cannot be feasibly reduced through a design change?8Have historical quality issues and warranty data from similar products been reviewed to understand failure modes?9Are DFMEA results part of the reporting at Design Reviews?101112131415X25%N/ADeliverable RYG RatingIP50%Location: / Site:Status (%):25% - Action Identified 50% - Owner Identified75% - Action in Progress 100% - Action Closed75%RRed: Some questions have a negative answer and no recovery plan is in place or the plans identified will have an impact in program timing. Support is required. When an item is highlighted Red an assessment on the impact to the WP timing needs to be provided.Reviewed by:100%YYellow: Some questions have a negative answer but a recovery plan is in place which will prevent impact on timingReviewed with:GGreen: All questions have a positive answer (Y) and are ongoing normal program developmentDate :

&"Arial,Bold"&20 2.01 Design Failure Modes and Effects Analysis

2.02.1 DFM&A#QuestionY*NN/ARAGEvidencesActions RequiredResponsibleOpen DateDue DateStatus%Actual End Date1Was a Design for Manufacturing and Assembly standard process followed?2Does a system exist for collecting and studying historical manufacturing defect data?3Have the DFMEA outputs been considered for designing the manufacturing process?4As the design evolves are the processes to be used in manfacturing clear?5Has the envisaged manufacturing process been mapped to identify potential issues, e.g. out of cell operations (using spaghetti maps)?6Have known manufacturing or assembly hazards been avoided?7Are part count targets being met?8Can the design solution be manufactured using state-of the art processes and within company industrial strategy processes?9Are processes that depend on toxic or hazardous materials being removed by design?1011121314X25%N/ADeliverable RYG RatingIP50%Location: / Site:Status (%):25% - Action Identified 50% - Owner Identified75% - Action in Progress 100% - Action Closed75%RRed: Some questions have a negative answer and no recovery plan is in place or the plans identified will have an impact in program timing. Support is required. When an item is highlighted Red an assessment on the impact to the WP timing needs to be provided.Reviewed by:100%YYellow: Some questions have a negative answer but a recovery plan is in place which will prevent impact on timingReviewed with:GGreen: All questions have a positive answer (Y) and are ongoing normal program developmentDate :

50%75%100%

&"Arial,Bold"&20 2.02.1 Design for Manufacturing and Assembly

2.02.2 DFMRO#QuestionY*NN/ARAGEvidencesActions RequiredResponsibleOpen DateDue DateStatus%Actual End Date1Was a Design for MRO standard process followed?2Has data from MRO history of similar products been gathered?3Has each feature of the new product been reviewed to understand how it will be maintained, restored by repair and rebuilt into the overhauled assembly?4Do features that have been problematic on prior designs exist on this design?5Have difficult to maintian, repair or rebuild features been removed by design?6Have features that drive extra maintenance burden, repair steps or other inefficient practices been removed by design?7Does a standard methodology exist for estimating MRO times?8Are MRO time targets being met by the design?9101112131415X25%N/ADeliverable RYG RatingIP50%Location: / Site:Status (%):25% - Action Identified 50% - Owner Identified75% - Action in Progress 100% - Action Closed75%RRed: Some questions have a negative answer and no recovery plan is in place or the plans identified will have an impact in program timing. Support is required. When an item is highlighted Red an assessment on the impact to the WP timing needs to be provided.Reviewed by:100%YYellow: Some questions have a negative answer but a recovery plan is in place which will prevent impact on timingReviewed with:GGreen: All questions have a positive answer (Y) and are ongoing normal program developmentDate :

&"Arial,Bold"&20 2.02.2 Design for Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul

2.02.3 CTIs & KCs#QuestionY*NN/ARAGEvidencesActions RequiredResponsibleOpen DateDue DateStatus%Actual End Date1Have customer defined CTI's or KC's been included in the preliminary list?2Is a standard process for identifying CTIs and KCs defined and has it been followed?3Has the DFMEA been incorporated into the process and has it identified other KC's?4Are KC's being documented in the Design Record where appropriate?5Are all other CTI's and KC's documented in the production control documents?6Is there a process for insuring that product CTIs and KCs are cascaded into the PFMEA?7Have KC failure modes been validated?89101112131415X25%N/ADeliverable RYG RatingIP50%Location: / Site:Status (%):25% - Action Identified 50% - Owner Identified75% - Action in Progress 100% - Action Closed75%RRed: Some questions have a negative answer and no recovery plan is in place or the plans identified will have an impact in program timing. Support is required. When an item is highlighted Red an assessment on the impact to the WP timing needs to be provided.Reviewed by:100%YYellow: Some questions have a negative answer but a recovery plan is in place which will prevent impact on timingReviewed with:GGreen: All questions have a positive answer (Y) and are ongoing normal program developmentDate :

50%75%100%

&"Arial,Bold"&20 2.02.3 Product Critical Items and Key Characteristics

Date of revision for the provided status and personnel involved

2.02.4 New Packaging#QuestionY*NN/ARAGEvidencesActions RequiredResponsibleOpen DateDue DateStatus%Actual End Date1Do packaging standard exist?2Does the proposed design adhere to those standards?3Does the proposed package design adhere to the customer requirements?4Does the packaging meet all regulatory requirements?5Has the packaging design been validated by all stakeholders including the customer when applicable?6789101112131415X25%N/ADeliverable RYG RatingIP50%Location: / Site:Status (%):25% - Action Identified 50% - Owner Identified75% - Action in Progress 100% - Action Closed75%RRed: Some questions have a negative answer and no recovery plan is in place or the plans identified will have an impact in program timing. Support is required. When an item is highlighted Red an assessment on the impact to the WP timing needs to be provided.Reviewed by:100%YYellow: Some questions have a negative answer but a recovery plan is in place which will prevent impact on timingReviewed with:GGreen: All questions have a positive answer (Y) and are ongoing normal program developmentDate :

50%75%100%

&"Arial,Bold"&20 2.02.4 New Packaging Specification

Date of revision for the provided status and personnel involved

2.03 Design Reviews#QuestionY*NN/ARAGEvidencesActions RequiredResponsibleOpen DateDue DateStatus%Actual End Date1For supplier owned designs, are Design Reviews being conducted in accordance with a standard process at the supplier?2Are Design Review attendees appropriately qualified to review and critique the design?3Do Design Review attendees adequately represent all functional stakeholders?4Are Design for Manufacture & Assembly and Design for MRO being condsidered at each review?5Have service and repair issues on similar designs been considered?6Is supplier input and past quality experience being considered?7Are product costs, weight and part counts being tracked?8Are the results of on-going Verification &Validation work being reviewed?9Do issues get tracked and resolved through a formal process?10Are reviews documented and shared with stakeholders in a timely manner?1112131415X25%N/ADeliverable RYG RatingIP50%Location: / Site:Status (%):25% - Action Identified 50% - Owner Identified75% - Action in Progress 100% - Action Closed75%RRed: Some questions have a negative answer and no recovery plan is in place or the plans identified will have an impact in program timing. Support is required. When an item is highlighted Red an assessment on the impact to the WP timing needs to be provided.Reviewed by:100%YYellow: Some questions have a negative answer but a recovery plan is in place which will prevent impact on timingReviewed with:GGreen: All questions have a positive answer (Y) and are ongoing normal program developmentDate :

50%75%100%

&"Arial,Bold"&20 2.03 Design Reviews

Date of revision for the provided status and personnel involved

2.04.1 Devt Plan#QuestionY*NN/ARAGEvidencesActions RequiredResponsibleOpen DateDue DateStatus%Actual End Date1Is development planning in accordance with a standard process?2Does the plan anticipate parts made on non-production tooling including rapid prototyping technologies?3Does the plan include testing by the customer in the customer's intended installion?4Is the plan aligned to the overall customer timing?5Is high risk testing front end loaded to the maximum extent possible?6Do stakeholders get updated on testing as the plan is executed?7Are specified test and inspection methods known to adequately validate the product?8Are special tests or inspections required to address new and unique product features?9Are test or inspection facility requirements clearly defined?10Is a specific test requirement defined for each test element?11Is the minimum acceptable standard of hardware specified for each plan element?12Are the success criteria for each plan element spelled out in advance of the element execution?13Are formal reports generated for each plan element?14Is there a fromal review at the end summarizing performance to expectation and noting shortfalls and remedial action?15X25%N/ADeliverable RYG RatingIP50%Location: / Site:Status (%):25% - Action Identified 50% - Owner Identified75% - Action in Progress 100% - Action Closed75%RRed: Some questions have a negative answer and no recovery plan is in place or the plans identified will have an impact in program timing. Support is required. When an item is highlighted Red an assessment on the impact to the WP timing needs to be provided.Reviewed by:100%YYellow: Some questions have a negative answer but a recovery plan is in place which will prevent impact on timingReviewed with:GGreen: All questions have a positive answer (Y) and are ongoing normal program developmentDate :

50%75%100%

&"Arial,Bold"&20 2.04.2 Verification and Validation Testing Plan

2.05 Review at Prodn Source#QuestionY*NN/ARAGEvidencesActions RequiredResponsibleOpen DateDue DateStatus%Actual End Date1Is the Design Review conducted using the lastest revion of the design record?2Do key suppliers participate in the design record review as appropriate?3Are key sub-tier suppliers involved where necessary?4Does the review follow a standard process?5Is the review outcome documented?6Is their a process for insuring the manufacturing source identified KC's are incorporated into the appropriate process documentation?7Are resources available to modify the design record to suit the manufacturing capability when warranted?8Have the production source(s), including suppliers and sub-tiers, signed off on their capability to produce product compliant with the design record?9101112131415X25%N/ADeliverable RYG RatingIP50%Location: / Site:Status (%):25% - Action Identified 50% - Owner Identified75% - Action in Progress 100% - Action Closed75%RRed: Some questions have a negative answer and no recovery plan is in place or the plans identified will have an impact in program timing. Support is required. When an item is highlighted Red an assessment on the impact to the WP timing needs to be provided.Reviewed by:100%YYellow: Some questions have a negative answer but a recovery plan is in place which will prevent impact on timingReviewed with:GGreen: All questions have a positive answer (Y) and are ongoing normal program developmentDate :

50%75%100%

&"Arial,Bold"&20 2.05 Design Record Review by Production Source

2.06 Management Support#QuestionY*NN/ARAGEvidencesActions RequiredResponsibleOpen DateDue DateStatus%Actual End Date1Has a thorough review of the product been conducted by Manufacturing Engineering using a standard process?2Has a scoring report been developed showing favourable and unfavorable elements of the product to be manufactured?3Have the right management members been briefed on the issues documented in the report?4Can resolutions to unfavourable ratings be implemented by the production source?5Does the customer agree to resolutions to unfavorable ratings that cannot be implemented at the production source?6Has managements decision to proceed or abandon been properly documented in the scoring report or equivalent?789101112131415X25%N/ADeliverable RYG RatingIP50%Location: / Site:Status (%):25% - Action Identified 50% - Owner Identified75% - Action in Progress 100% - Action Closed75%RRed: Some questions have a negative answer and no recovery plan is in place or the plans identified will have an impact in program timing. Support is required. When an item is highlighted Red an assessment on the impact to the WP timing needs to be provided.Reviewed by:100%YYellow: Some questions have a negative answer but a recovery plan is in place which will prevent impact on timingReviewed with:GGreen: All questions have a positive answer (Y) and are ongoing normal program developmentDate :

&"Arial,Bold"&20 2.06 Management Support