Upload
christian-evans
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
1
A Model for Secondary Literacy Improvement
Including Putting Literacy Coaches to Work Districtwide
A Presentation to the Alliance for Excellent Education
Lauren Greenberg, COREDiane Innes, Pasadena USD
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
2
CORE: Consortium on Reading Excellence
Collaborates with schools and districts nationwide to improve literacy instruction
Provides professional development and support for teachers, coaches, and administrators
Provides training and support to over ten state Departments of Education
Committed to a full implementation model for literacy achievement
Supports a wide variety of research-based programs as opposed to any specific curriculum
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
3
Challenges for Secondary Literacy
"Most large, urban comprehensive high schools have never graduated more than half of their students or prepared more than a third of students for postsecondary education. Today, many students do not have the basic skills to pass required courses and advance to the next grade. Often, more than half the ninth-grade students in large urban high schools are not able to read their more demanding textbooks, but few if any of these high schools teach literacy."
Carnegie Challenge 2001: Creating a New Vision of the Urban High School
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
4
Crucial Components of Secondary School Reform
Structural changes enabling students to receive personalized attention
Increased levels of academic rigor Differentiated instruction providing sustained
support for students lacking basic literacy and math skills
Improvements in instructional content and delivery resulting in instruction that is explicit, active, and engaging
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
5
Specialized and small group
Added reteaching and supplement/
small group
Added time
Three-tier Model
Added time
© 2005 Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc.
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
6
The Big Question:
How many students really are in need of intensive intervention?
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
7
Reading Next says:
“In considering how to improve the academic achievement of our nation’s struggling readers and writers, it is critical to remember that only 10 percent of students struggle with decoding (reading words accurately), and thirty years of research by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) have provided solutions for these decoding problems. Thus this report focuses on the question of which elements of interventions are most promising for the large population of struggling students who already decode accurately but still struggle with reading and writing after third grade.” (p. 11)
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
8
What is the Source of the 10% Estimate?
Most likely source of statistic is Curtis and Longo’s When Adolescents Can’t Read
Very specific sample of students- at Girls and Boys Town in Omaha, Nebraska
Authors employ Chall’s 6 stages of reading development
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
9
Chall’s Stages of Reading Development
Stage 0: Prereading Stage 1: Decoding Stage 2: Confirmation Stage 3: Reading to Learn Stage 4: Multiple Viewpoints Stage 5: Construction and Reconstruction
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
10
How Many are Stuck at Each Stage?
(0) Prereading: almost none (1) Decoding: one in ten (most basic level) (2) Confirmation: one in eight (3) Reading to Learn: one in two (4) Multiple Viewpoints: all need assistance (5) Construction and Reconstruction: almost
none reach this stageSource: When Adolescents Can’t Read
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
11
An Alternate Estimate:
“Nationally, 25% of all adults are functionally illiterate. . . .At any age, poor readers as a group are distinguished by weakness in phonological processing and word recognition speed and accuracy.”
Louisa Moats, “Why Older Kids Can’t Read – And What Can Be Done About It,” 2001.
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
12
% of 8th Graders Scoring Below Basic NAEP 2005 Reading Assessment
Overall Females Males White
29 24 34 19Black Hispanic Eligible for
Free/Reduced Lunch
Not Eligible for Free/ Reduced
Lunch
49 45 43 19
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
13
The Need for Intensive Intervention
Students with severe reading difficulty are not evenly distributed in our nation’s schools
Exclusive focus on comprehension strategies is not adequate
Large numbers of disfluent students need help with fluency and multisyllabic word decoding
For EL’s and most strategic students the big issue is vocabulary
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
14
Some Suggested Additions to Reading Next’s Fifteen Key Elements
Necessity of meeting student needs at three levels Inclusion of a comprehensive, intensive intervention
program for students needing extra help Specific focus on increased role of explicit
vocabulary instruction A call for secondary literacy coaches to support
implementation and coach teachers through the change process
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
15
CORE’s model
Training for reading leaders, literacy coaches, and teachers
Full implementation of a research-based intensive intervention program (2-3 periods per day)
Strategic instruction classes to support students within 2 years of grade level
Increased use of explicit vocabulary instruction and text comprehension strategies across all content classes
Data collection and analysis A comprehensive literacy support system
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
16
The Task of High School Text
“In the late 1800’s and early 1900’s, European imperialism reached its peak as stronger nations colonized and domi-nated weaker nations. Economic, nation-alistic, military, and humanitarian factors led to the growth of imperial-ism. The growth of economic industries created an increased need for natural resources. The European spirit of national-ism, the belief that one nation’s goals are superior to those of other nations, caused nations to want to protect their interests.”
America: Pathways to the Present, Prentice Hall 2003
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
17
Strategic Instruction
Direct, explicit instruction in a double period Uses standards-based grade-level materials plus program-
specific ancillary materials targeted for struggling readers Pre-teaching of reading and comprehension strategies Increased attention to building vocabulary and background
knowledge Multiple readings of text Adjusted pacing Interactive strategies for increased student participation Specific attention to fluency Explicit instruction in writing and spelling
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
18
Horizontal and Vertical Supports
Horizontal: School level Adequate program-specific
teacher training Site based literacy coach Involved, supportive
principal and instructional VP who support appropriate scheduling and teacher assignment
Knowledgeable counselors who support appropriate placement
Vertical: District level Provide adequate materials Increased FTE’s District-wide agreements
about credits, grades, promotion policies
Support data collection District-level literacy coach Provide ongoing
professional development Ongoing and frequent
walkthroughs
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
19
Case Study: Pasadena, CA
CORE began working with the Pasadena Unified School District late in 2003 through financial support of the Stupski Foundation.
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
20
Pasadena Unified School District
Urban school district within a very prosperous, diverse city
22,336 Students K-12 67.7% Free and Reduced lunch 23.4% English Learners
(Based on 2004-2005 data)
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
21
PUSD: Ethnically diverse
54% Hispanic 25.7% African-American 15.4% White 2.5% Asian 1.2% Filipino 1.2% Other
(Based on 2004-2005 data)
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
22
Secondary Sites
Three K-8 schools Three large middle schools (6-8)
One 6-12 school One 7-12 school Two large comprehensive high schools (9-12) One alternative high school (9-12)
Approximately 10,350 total students 6-12
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
23
Common Implementation Problems
Holt Literature was used in all English classes. High Point, Language! and Corrective Reading were being used in some schools, BUT . . .
– Programs not given enough time– Students not properly placed– Students placed in two curriculums at once (e.g. 1 period of
Corrective Reading and 1 period of Holt)– English classes not differentiated according to student
performance (no Strategic support) – Teachers received little or no ongoing coaching
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
24
Quality of Implementation Matters
Typically, improper student placement, combined with inadequate time to fully teach the program, results in poor outcomes.
In such situations, teachers often blame the program rather than the quality of implementation.
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
25
Fiscal Realities
Due to budgetary concerns, it was not feasible to serve all students in grades 6-12.
The decision was made to require all schools to serve their students in grades 7 and 9 with intensive intervention and strategic classes.
Grades 8 and 10 would be added in the next year of implementation.
Literacy coaches were funded for each site.
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
26
Research Based Materials
A variety of research-based materials are in use:– REACH (Corrective Reading) at most middle
schools– Read 180 at one middle school– Language! at all high schools
Holt Literature for Benchmark and Strategic classes
High Point for EL students
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
27
A Three-Year Implementation Process
Year One Year Two Year Three
Leadership training
Choose & order materials
Scheduling
Assessment
Placement
Board support
The challenge: high quality implementation of five separate programs at eleven schools.
Intensive coach training
Instructional delivery
Fully integrate special education into three-tier system
Strategic instruction
Vocabulary instruction
Step Up to Writing added
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
28
Structures to Support Implementation
District Coordinator for Literacy Intervention District Language Development Resource Teacher (LDRT)
to support EL instruction Literacy coach at each site plus CORE coach training LDRT at each site Adequate program-specific training Ongoing CORE support and training Ongoing system of walkthroughs at each site Careful oversight by Director of Secondary Curriculum
and Coordinator of Language Development
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
29
Role of the Site Literacy Coaches
Support literacy instruction in intervention, strategic, and benchmark classes
Support content teachers Coaching: Focused observations and constructive
feedback Professional development Data collection and analysis Model lessons Co-planning, co-teaching
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
30
Coaching: An Evolving Role
Year One Year Two Year Three
Technical assistance to teachers learning new intervention program; materials and placement
Expanded focus on strategic instruction; refining instruction in intervention classes; pacing and data analysis
Expanded focus on supporting the content-area teachers; continued support for strategic instruction; school-wide professional
development
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
31
Ongoing CORE support and training
Program specific support Coaching support Walkthroughs Strategic instruction training Site specific visits Demonstration lessons Reading leadership training for administrators
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
32
So……….
After all this focused effort………
What happened?
………………………………. let’s take a look!
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
33
California Standards Test English Language Arts 2005
% of Students Scoring At or Above Proficient
PUSD 2004 2005 Change
7th Grade 26 33 +7
9th Grade 25 37 +12
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
34
California Standards Test English Language Arts 2005 % of Students Scoring Below Basic
or Far Below Basic
PUSD 2004 2005 Change
7th Grade
40 34 -6
9th Grade
44 32 -12
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
35
Schoolwide Improvement on California’s Academic Performance Index (API)
Year 2000 to 2001
2001 to 2002
2002 to 2003
2003 to 2004
2004 to 2005
Total API
Growth
35 167 61 109 282
Unprecedented total API growth for the 7 middle and high schools serving students in grades 6-12:
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
36
Districtwide Changes
Focus, Focus, Focus! New literacy vocabulary ALL secondary principals involved Coaches are integral to school program Commitment to success for ALL students Walkthroughs are a fact of life District Literacy Team FROM ISOLATION TO COLLABORATION!
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
37
Other Whole District Implementations
Yakima, Washington Pasadena, CA Buffalo, NY Lake Pend Oreille, Idaho
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
38
Growth in Yakima, WA 2005, 2004, 2003 WASL Comparisons
State & CORE Middle Schools % 7th Grade Students Meeting Standards
State of Washington 2005, 2004, 2003 WASL Comparisons State & CORE Middle Schools % 7th Grade Students Meeting Standards
(Yakima District using High Point)
49%
26%
12%
16%
35%
61%
41%
35%
30%
52%
69%
57%
45% 46%
69%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
State and Middle Schools
% 7
th G
rad
e S
tud
en
ts M
ee
tin
g S
tan
dard
2003-02 Yr 1
2004-03 Yr 2
2004-05 Yr 3
2003-02 Yr 1 49% 26% 12% 16% 35%
2004-03 Yr 2 61% 41% 35% 30% 52%
2004-05 Yr 3 69% 57% 45% 46% 69%
Washington State Franklin Lewis & Clark Washington Wilson
2003-04 Target = 30% (yellow line)
2004-05 Target 48% ( red line)
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
39
Major Challenges and Roadblocks
Structural Financial Instructional Varied and complex student population
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
40
Structural Challenges
Traditional high school schedule A-G course requirements Credits, grades Some structures, such as SLC’s, may make it
difficult to place all students correctly Smaller schools face unique challenges Balkanization of various departments (English, EL,
Special Ed) who must now work together Requirement of highly qualified teachers under
NCLB
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
41
Financial Strains
Cost of materials- an ongoing cost Teacher training and professional development Number one cost: additional FTE’s to support
additional literacy sections with smaller class size Literacy coaches (district and site level) Additional data collection support staff High costs of technology-based programs (both
hardware and ongoing support)
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
42
Continuing Challenges in Pasadena
Budgetary crisis has led to– Decreased FTE’s resulting in an inability to offer
double-period intervention classes– Difficulty in sustaining reduced class size– Teacher turnover
Ongoing training for new teachers, or those newly assigned to strategic or intervention classes
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
43
Instructional Challenges
Traditional model of secondary instruction is well-entrenched
The vast majority of secondary teachers have no understanding of or training in providing explicit instruction
Culture of isolation; resistance to coaching and concept of program fidelity
Profoundly difficult to change instructional practices- requires multiple opportunities for exposure and guided practice
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
44
In•er•tia
1. apathyinability or unwillingness to move or act
2. resistance to changeThe property of a body by which it remains at rest or
continues moving in a straight line unless acted upon by a directional force
(Encarta Dictionary of North American English)
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
45
The Challenge of a Varied and Complex Student Population
Students with profound vocabulary deficits Redesignated EL students who continue to
struggle Students with a variety of learning issues Students with severe behavioral issues Students with serious attendance issues Many also need intensive math intervention
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
46
Key Lessons
The reality of struggling districts includes large numbers of students in need of intensive intervention
The key to improved outcomes is a high quality implementation of a strong program
The literacy coach is crucial in ensuring strong implementation
A system of multiple supports is necessary All of the above cost real dollars; districts cannot
accomplish this merely by reshuffling funding
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
47
Thank You!For more information about our
K-12 services see: www.corelearn.com
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
48
Additional slides for Q/A
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
49
How is the Intervention Class Different from “Remedial Reading” Class?
Placement based on multiple measures with specific needs identified
Grouping for like needs Comprehensive research-based curriculum
delivered by a highly trained teacher Goal is accelerated instruction and growth Provided with sufficient intensity and duration Ongoing teacher support and accountability
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
50
Placement in Intervention Should be Flexible
Accountability for student mastery through data analysis
Periodic check-in for correct student placement
Upon completion and mastery of specified curricula, students move on and up
Intervention should NOT be a life sentence!
7/10/2006 © CORE Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. 2006
51
Intensive Intervention Programs
A wide variety of research-based programs are available, including:
Language! Read 180 REACH (Corrective Reading) High Point Reading is FAME Fast Track Reading (Wright Group) Wilson Reading System