2
EvaluationRubric Basedonevaluationschemefoundin CreatingIntegratedCurriculum(1998)bySusanDrake BelowExpectations MeetsExpectations BeyondExpectations MinistryLevel One Two Three Four Five MarkingScheme 0/1(Inadequate/Poor) 2.5(Adequate/Marginal) 3.5(Good) 4.5(VeryGood) 5(Excellent/Outstandin Timeline 1. Informationcomplete 2. Accurate(andcited wherenecessary). o Didnotsubmittimeline. o Noinformationwas cited. o Limitedresearch. Moredetails necessary. o Providesnoevidence ofcriticalthinkingto evaluatecontent. o Someinformationwas notcited. o Informationwas completeandaccurate. o Informationwascited andmorethanone sourcewasused. o  o Informationcomplete, accurate,andwell summarized. o Allinformationcited andmorethanone sourcewasused. o Informa ti on beyond le incompletenessand accuracy. o I nf or ma ti on full y ci ted several sources wer e u NarrativeContent 1. Correspondstotimeline 2. Superiorcommandof thelanguage. o Didnotsubmitnarrative. o Someinconsistencies withtimeline. o Terminologyand vocabularylackingor confused. o Adequateuseofthe languageand appropriatevocabulary utilized. o Someinconsistencies withtimeline. o Gooduseofvocabulary andterminology. o Noinconsistencieswith timeline. o Noinconsistencieswith timeline. o Properandeffective useoflanguage, vocabulary,and terminology. o Commandoflanguage, vocabulary,and terminologysuperior. o Noinconsistencieswit timeline. Illustration 1. Imagesmatchwords. o Didnotsubmit illustration. o Illustrationwasdifficult tounderstandand unappealing. o Imagesdidnotmake sensewithtopic. o Somewhatconsistent andappropriate. o Illustrationlogicaland concise. o Illustrationlogicaland concise. o Canbeeasily interpreted. o Presentation beyond l inorganizationand attractiveness. o Canbe easily inter pret WritingMechanics: GrammarandSpelling o Manymajorgrammaror spellingerrors. o Fewmajorgrammaror spellingerrors. o Fewminorgrammaror sellingerrors. o Acoupleofminor grammarorspelling errorsevident. o Nogrammarorspellin errorsevident.

6.2 Grading Rubric

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

8/8/2019 6.2 Grading Rubric

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/62-grading-rubric 1/2

Evaluation Rubric

Based on evaluation scheme found in Creating Integrated Curriculum (1998) by Susan Drake

Below Expectations Meets Expectations Beyond ExpectationsMinistry LevelOne Two Three Four Five

Marking Scheme 0/1 (Inadequate/Poor) 2.5 (Adequate/Marginal) 3.5 (Good) 4.5 (Very Good) 5 (Excellent/Outstandin

Timeline1. Information complete2. Accurate (and cited

where necessary).

o Did not submit timeline.o No information was

cited.

o Limited research.More detailsnecessary.

o Provides no evidenceof critical thinking toevaluate content.

o Some information wasnot cited.

o Information wascomplete and accurate.

o Information was citedand more than onesource was used.

o

o Information complete,accurate, and wellsummarized.

o All information citedand more than onesource was used.

o Information beyond le in completeness andaccuracy.

o Information fully citedseveral sources were u

Narrative Content1. Corresponds to timeline2. Superior command of

the language.

o Did not submit narrative.o Some inconsistencies

with timeline.o Terminology and

vocabulary lacking orconfused.

o Adequate use of thelanguage andappropriate vocabularyutilized.

o Some inconsistencieswith timeline.

o Good use of vocabularyand terminology.

o No inconsistencies withtimeline.

o No inconsistencies withtimeline.

o Proper and effectiveuse of language,vocabulary, andterminology.

o Command of language,vocabulary, andterminology superior.

o No inconsistencies wit timeline.

Illustration1. Images match words.

o Did not submitillustration.

o Illustration was difficultto understand andunappealing.

o Images did not makesense with topic.

o Somewhat consistentand appropriate.

o Illustration logical andconcise.

o Illustration logical andconcise.

o Can be easilyinterpreted.

o Presentation beyond l in organization andattractiveness.

o Can be easily interpret

Writing Mechanics:Grammar and Spelling

o Many major grammar orspelling errors.

o Few major grammar orspelling errors.

o Few minor grammar orselling errors.

o A couple of minorgrammar or spellingerrors evident.

o No grammar or spellin errors evident.

8/8/2019 6.2 Grading Rubric

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/62-grading-rubric 2/2

Evaluation Rubric

Based on evaluation scheme found in Creating Integrated Curriculum (1998) by Susan Drake

Creativity1. Personification evident.2. Details exemplary.3. Imagery included.

o Lacks detail.o Lacks personification and

imagery techniques.

o Somewhat detailed.o Personification and

imagery techniquesunsuccessfullyattempted.

o Somewhat detailed.o Successful personification

and imagery techniques,but could use more.

o Content is detailed.o Good amount of

personification andimagery used.

o Content is thorough an detailed.

o Excellent amount ofpersonification and im used.

Comments/Observations/Conference __________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Student Signature ______________________________________________________ Teacher Signature _____________________________________________