6 MBE Applications

  • Upload
    minutm

  • View
    219

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    1/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    2/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    3/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    4/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    5/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    6/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    7/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    8/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    9/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    10/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    11/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    12/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    13/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    14/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    15/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    16/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    17/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    18/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    19/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    20/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    21/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    22/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    23/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    24/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    25/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    26/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    27/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    28/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    29/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    30/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    31/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    32/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    33/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    34/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    35/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    36/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    37/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    38/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    39/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    40/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    41/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    42/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    43/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    44/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    45/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    46/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    47/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    48/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    49/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    50/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    51/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    52/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    53/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    54/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    55/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    56/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    57/64

    These are all pressure related func5ons and can be obtained from PVT data.

    Which gives

    Dake1 proposes structuring a table with the following steps: Steps:(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii)

    Pressure ,Y,Z(p) S o k rg/k ro So So Np/N GO(psia) /psi PV PV PV scf/stb

    (i) Pressure in steps below bubble point(ii) Table of ,Y &Z(p) values, calculated at the average pressures between the

    steps in I.(iii) So prior to the pressure drop p.(iv) ela5ve permeability ra5o at last value of S

    o.

    (v) So determined using eqn. 77.(vi) The lower value of S o at reduced pressure.(vii) The frac5onal recovery from bubble point. Equa5on 82(viii) The GO obtained from GO eqn using k rg/k ro value obtained from new So

    So =oil remaining

    one PV=

    N N p( )BoNB oi

    1 Swc( )

    N pN

    = 1 So

    1 Swc

    BoiBo

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    58/64

    All the procedures are similar , and are very dependant on reservoir, uidand rock data. The quality of a material balance study of a reservoir isrelated to the quality of the data. There clearly should be sufficient data

    both with respect to quan5ty and quality as in any simula5on study thequality of the output is directly related to the quality of the input. Anotherchallenge is the deni5on of the average reservoir pressure. We willbriey look at these two data perspec5ves.

    Data for Solu/on Gas Drive Predic/onsPrior to carrying out the MB procedure it is important to test the data, ifthere is past produc5on data available. The methods can then be used toexamine if they are capable of predic5ng past performance. Clearly if thecold data does not enable past performance predic5ons to be matched,then there is an opportunity to adjust some of the data to obtain a historymatch. The data can then be used with be^er condence to predictfuture performance. Listed below are the data which are used in thevarious solu5on gas drive predic5on procedures. Some of them could beadjusted in history matching.

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    59/64

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    60/64

    Gas Drive ReservoirsAs discussed in Drive Mechanisms Chapter, Gas Drive is also a deple5ontype reservoir. From the nature of the pressure gradients within the oilcolumn it is also likely that solu5on gas drive is also ac5ve when deple5nga gas cap drive reservoir. Cole has pointed out that gas drive is essen5ally afrontal drive displacing mechanism. In this respect the high mobility of thedisplacing gas to that of the displaced oil is such that in deple5ng the oilreservoir it is important to minimise the rate , to reduce bypassing of oilby the advancing gas oil contact. The density differences of gas and oil

    clearly help to offset the advancing mobility ra5o effect. Tarner's methodcan be used for Gas Cap drive reservoir predic5ons. The equa5on howevermay need altera5on to account for gas coming out of solu5on migra5nginto the gas cap. In Tarner's method the equa5on for Gas Produc5on, G ,becomes:

    N pR p =N B o + R si R s( )Bg Bob( )+ mB ob Bg BgiBgi

    N p Bo R sBg( )

    Bg

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    61/64

    Average Reservoir PressureThe material balance approach is some5mes considered as the tankmodel. In the applica5on of the MB equa5on we are assuming that thepressure is uniformly distributed across the reservoir. If there is uniform

    pressure decline in all the wells in the reservoir then this pressure declinegives condence for applica5on of the MB tool. Dake pointed out that ifthis equilibrium is not achieved, the MB approach can s5ll be used. Hesuggested that an average pressure can be determined to represent areservoir where there are large differen5al pressures across the reservoir.He presents an averaging procedure for reservoirs where pressure

    equilibrium has not been achieved. In the gure below from Dake arepresented the pressures for equilibrium condi5ons and the well posi5onsand boundaries for a non equilibrium condi5on.

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    62/64

    Well Posi5ons and

    DrainageBoundaries

    Well pressure for Non

    Equilibrium Wells

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    63/64

    Having worked through this chapter the Student will be able to:

    Given the MB equa5on be able to present it in a short hand form asa basis for use in linear forms.

    Using the various linear forms with sketches illustrate the MBequa5on for use for: eservoir with no water drive or gas cap. No water drive but with known gas cap.

    Comment with the aid of sketches the impact of water drive on theapplica5on of MB equa5on in linear and other forms.

    Derive and use a simplied MB equa5on for applica5on to an oilreservoir above the bubble point, in terms of recovery, and oil, rockand water compressibility.

    Derive the instantaneous gasoil ra5o equa5on and use to explainthe producing GO of a solu5on gas drive reservoir.

  • 7/31/2019 6 MBE Applications

    64/64