8
MARAGING AND NICKEL-MOLYBDENUM TRIP-STEELS UDC 669.15-194.55:539.4.015 ELEVATION OF RELIABILITY CHARACTERISTICS OF MARAGING STEEL 03N18K9M5T BY CREATING A “NANOTRIPLEX”-TYPE STRUCTURE V. P. Vylezhnev, 1 S. A. Kokovyakina, 1 Yu. N. Simonov, 1 and A. A. Sukhikh 2 Translated from Metallovedenie i Termicheskaya Obrabotka Metallov , No. 11, pp. 39 – 47, November, 2010. Characteristics of mechanical strength of maraging steel N18K9M5T after various variants of heat treatment are studied. The treatment mode providing a structure with retained austenite and two types of reverted austen- ite is determined. An optimum structure ensuring enough strength at high impact toughness and static and cy- clic crack resistances is chosen. Key words: maraging steel, retained and reverted austenite, strength, crack resistance. INTRODUCTION Maraging steels (MAS) are promising structural materi- als possessing high resistance to fracture. The high properties of MAS are primarily a result of an inhomogeneous struc- ture. The scale of the inhomogeneity may differ from a microlevel (boundaries of former austenite grains or mar- tensite lath packets) to a submicrolevel and even to a nano- level (lath boundaries and particles of intermetallic harden- ing phases respectively). The structural strength of MAS can be raised by creating additional inhomogeneities at the submicro- and nanolevels, for example, by forming a martensite-austenite structure [1 – 3]. It is common practice to form what is known as re- verted austenite g rev , which is obtained by heating a steel with initially martensitic structure in the intercritical tempe- rature range (ITR) [4 – 6]. Reverted austenite possesses high stability, which is associated with the elevated concentration of g-stabilizers and the presence of particles of hardening phases. Formation of 20 – 40% reverted austenite in the structure promotes increase in the impact toughness, cold re- sistance, fatigue resistance, and cyclic crack resistance, but the strength level is not maximum. The proportion of g rev in steel 03N18K9M5T can be va- ried by changing the temperature of heating in the inter- critical range and the duration of the hold. As a rule, MAS are heated to 575 – 625°C (the lower half of the intercritical range) in order to obtain a noticeable amount of g rev . In- crease in the hold time from 15 to 60 min at 575, 600, and 625°C yields 10 – 35, 15 – 55, and 40 – 60% g rev , respec- tively [5]. In order to form retained austenite g ret in the structure of MAS the latter has to be cooled from the single-phase g-re- gion. However, hardening with conventional heating and long-term hold does not yield a noticeable amount of g ret . Formation of g ret in steel 03Kh18K9M5T is possible only when the concentration inhomogeneity obtained as a result of a preliminary thermal operation, for example, hardening from the intercritical temperature range, is not removed by subsequent hardening from the austenitic range. In follows from the results of [5, 7] that in order to obtain g ret it is expedient to resort to rapid heating with subsequent short hold in the austenitic range, the duration of which does not exceed 10 min. The data presented in [5, 7] show that in heating to 800°C the proportion of g ret decreases from 45 to 20% upon prolonging of the hold from 3 to 10 min. In heat- ing to 840°C the amount of g ret decreases from 35 to 10%; at 840°C it falls from 20% to almost 0% upon the same change in the duration of the hold. The most interesting result of preliminary study [5] is the fact that in the presence of g ret in the structure of MAS the critical temperature A 1 decreases substantially and the ap- pearance of “new” g rev may be expected starting with Metal Science and Heat Treatment, Vol. 52, Nos. 11 – 12, March, 2011 (Russian Original Nos. 11 – 12, November – December, 2010) 550 0026-0673/11/1112-0550 © 2011 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 1 Perm State Engineering University, Perm, Russia (e-mail: [email protected]). 2 Institute for Applied Mechanics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Izhevsk, Russia.

550-557

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

metačs

Citation preview

  • MARAGING AND NICKEL-MOLYBDENUM TRIP-STEELS

    UDC 669.15-194.55:539.4.015

    ELEVATION OF RELIABILITY CHARACTERISTICS OF MARAGING STEEL

    03N18K9M5T BY CREATING A NANOTRIPLEX-TYPE STRUCTURE

    V. P. Vylezhnev,1 S. A. Kokovyakina,1 Yu. N. Simonov,1 and A. A. Sukhikh2

    Translated from Metallovedenie i Termicheskaya Obrabotka Metallov, No. 11, pp. 39 47, November, 2010.

    Characteristics of mechanical strength of maraging steel N18K9M5T after various variants of heat treatment

    are studied. The treatment mode providing a structure with retained austenite and two types of reverted austen-

    ite is determined. An optimum structure ensuring enough strength at high impact toughness and static and cy-

    clic crack resistances is chosen.

    Key words: maraging steel, retained and reverted austenite, strength, crack resistance.

    INTRODUCTION

    Maraging steels (MAS) are promising structural materi-

    als possessing high resistance to fracture. The high properties

    of MAS are primarily a result of an inhomogeneous struc-

    ture. The scale of the inhomogeneity may differ from a

    microlevel (boundaries of former austenite grains or mar-

    tensite lath packets) to a submicrolevel and even to a nano-

    level (lath boundaries and particles of intermetallic harden-

    ing phases respectively).

    The structural strength of MAS can be raised by creating

    additional inhomogeneities at the submicro- and nanolevels,

    for example, by forming a martensite-austenite structure

    [1 3]. It is common practice to form what is known as re-

    verted austenite rev

    , which is obtained by heating a steel

    with initially martensitic structure in the intercritical tempe-

    rature range (ITR) [4 6]. Reverted austenite possesses high

    stability, which is associated with the elevated concentration

    of -stabilizers and the presence of particles of hardening

    phases. Formation of 20 40% reverted austenite in the

    structure promotes increase in the impact toughness, cold re-

    sistance, fatigue resistance, and cyclic crack resistance, but

    the strength level is not maximum.

    The proportion of rev

    in steel 03N18K9M5T can be va-

    ried by changing the temperature of heating in the inter-

    critical range and the duration of the hold. As a rule, MAS

    are heated to 575 625C (the lower half of the intercritical

    range) in order to obtain a noticeable amount of rev

    . In-

    crease in the hold time from 15 to 60 min at 575, 600, and

    625C yields 10 35, 15 55, and 40 60% rev

    , respec-

    tively [5].

    In order to form retained austenite ret

    in the structure of

    MAS the latter has to be cooled from the single-phase -re-

    gion. However, hardening with conventional heating and

    long-term hold does not yield a noticeable amount of ret

    .

    Formation of ret

    in steel 03Kh18K9M5T is possible only

    when the concentration inhomogeneity obtained as a result

    of a preliminary thermal operation, for example, hardening

    from the intercritical temperature range, is not removed by

    subsequent hardening from the austenitic range.

    In follows from the results of [5, 7] that in order to obtain

    retit is expedient to resort to rapid heating with subsequent

    short hold in the austenitic range, the duration of which does

    not exceed 10 min. The data presented in [5, 7] show that in

    heating to 800C the proportion of ret

    decreases from 45 to

    20% upon prolonging of the hold from 3 to 10 min. In heat-

    ing to 840C the amount of ret

    decreases from 35 to 10%; at

    840C it falls from 20% to almost 0% upon the same change

    in the duration of the hold.

    The most interesting result of preliminary study [5] is the

    fact that in the presence of ret

    in the structure of MAS the

    critical temperature A1

    decreases substantially and the ap-

    pearance of new rev

    may be expected starting with

    Metal Science and Heat Treatment, Vol. 52, Nos. 11 12, March, 2011 (Russian Original Nos. 11 12, November December, 2010)

    550

    0026-0673/11/1112-0550 2011 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.

    1Perm State Engineering University, Perm, Russia (e-mail:

    [email protected]).2

    Institute for Applied Mechanics of the Ural Branch of the Russian

    Academy of Sciences, Izhevsk, Russia.

  • 440 450C. In MAS without ret

    the temperature of the ap-

    pearance of the first portions of rev

    is close to 520 540C.

    Therefore, aging at a temperature corresponding to maxi-

    mum hardening of MAS (490 500C) simultaneously with

    formation of particles of a hardening phase in the martensite

    leads to formation of about 15 20% new rev

    .

    The joint presence of two types of austenite in MAS (in

    this case the sizes of the austenite inclusions approach the

    nanometer range) should elevate substantially the properties

    of the MAS, the reliability in the first turn.

    The aim of the present work was to study the effect of dif-

    ferent types of austenite on the mechanical properties of steel

    03N18K9M5T under static, dynamic, and cyclic loading.

    METHODS OF STUDY

    We studied maraging steel 03Kh18K9M5T melted in an

    induction furnace from pure blend materials. The chemical

    composition of the steel was as follows (in wt.%): 0.009 C,

    18.3 Ni, 8.9 Co, 5.1 Mo, 0.68 Ti, 0.06 Al, 0.03 Si, 0.03 Mn,

    0.004 S, and 0.007 P.

    The phase composition of the steel was determined with

    the help of x-ray diffraction analysis by comparing the inte-

    gral intensities of the x-ray interference lines from the - and

    -phases (radiation from the Co anode). Micrographs were

    taken from the surfaces of etched laps and fracture surfaces.

    The structure was studied by the method of transmission

    electron microscopy using MMA-3, M-125, and

    JEM-200 CX electron microscopes; the structure of the frac-

    tures was studied using a REM-100U scanning electron mi-

    croscope.

    Uniaxial tensile tests and computation of the strength and

    ductility characteristics were performed in accordance with

    the requirements of GOST 149784. The tests were carried

    out in an R-5 testing machine for five-fold cylindrical speci-

    mens 5 mm in diameter and 25 mm long. The impact tough-

    ness was determined according to GOST 945478 for speci-

    mens with a U-notch (size type 3 ).

    The tests for cyclic crack resistance under harmonic

    loading were performed in accordance with RD 50-34582

    [8] in a rigid-load machine at an almost trivial cycle

    (R = 0.05) and a frequency of 14 Hz. The specimens were

    prepared as for eccentric tension and had a size of 62.5

    60 10 mm. Crack growth was controlled using a binocular

    microscope with scale division of the ocular equal to

    0.05 mm. The results of the tests were used to plot diagrams

    of cyclic crack resistance (DCCR) in the form of a depen-

    dence log V = f (log K ), where V is the rate of growth of the

    crack and K is the amplitude of the stress intensity factor.

    Specimens of type 1 of (GOST 945478) were subjected

    to fatigue tests under cyclic impact loading using a KPU-2

    impact testing machine at a frequency of 10.4 sec 1 and a

    cycle asymmetry factor R = 0. The maximum cyclic stresses

    were max

    = 1650 and 2600 MPa. Diagrams of fracture of the

    specimens were recorded by the method of [9]. We deter-

    mined the total number of cycles before failure Ntot

    and the

    periods of nucleation of a fatigue crack N1

    and of its propa-

    gation N2

    (Ntot

    = N1

    + N2

    ) and evaluated the rate of growth

    of the crack. Period N1

    was evaluated as the number of cy-

    cles from the start of the test to formation of a fatigue crack

    with a depth of 0.1 mm. The rate of growth of the fatigue

    crack in any studied segment of the fracture diagram of a

    specimen was determined as a derivative V = dldV. The un-known dependence l = f (N ), where l is the length of the

    crack and N is the current number of cycles in the stage of

    crack propagation (N = 0 at l = 0.1 mm), was approximated

    by an exponential function l = c exp (bN ), where c and b are

    the sought-for factors. Whence V = bc exp (bN ) or V = bl.

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    Structure of Steel 03N18K9M5T with Different Types

    of Austenite

    Reverted Austenite. This type of austenite is formed both

    inside crystals of the -phase in the form of differently ori-

    ented rods (Fig. 1) and over boundaries of martensite laths

    and packets in the form of fragments of extended crystals.

    After aging at 550C for 1 h the structure of the metal bears

    about 23% rev

    . The width of its crystals is 30 110 nm and

    the length is 110 550 nm. After 1-h aging at 600C the con-

    tent of rev

    increases to 53%, and the maximum width of its

    crystals grows to 150 nm. Dislocations and intermetallic par-

    ticles of acicular (Ni3Ti) and equiaxed (Fe2Mo) shapes are

    observable in the crystals of rev

    . The rev

    phase forms in a

    crystallographically ordered manner [10 12]. This mecha-

    nism of transformation promotes inheriting of the dis-

    location structure of the -phase, whereas the enrichment of

    the austenite crystals with nickel is one of the causes of its

    stabilization.

    Heating of the steel preliminarily aged at 600C for 1 h

    to 820C with a hold of from 12 to 2 min and subsequent

    rapid cooling to room temperature yields from 10 to 60%

    ret. The retained austenite is preserved in the former vo-

    lumes of reverted austenite. At the same content of -phase

    the shape and sizes of the crystals of ret

    are close to those of

    the crystals of rev

    that have emerged during the hold in the

    intercritical range (Fig. 2).

    After a short high-temperature hold (2 min) the structure

    preserves equiaxed intermetallics, most probably of a Fe2Mo

    phase. They are located in crystals of both -phase and

    -phase. In the crystals of ret

    the dislocation structure that

    has appeared as a result of the reverse transformation

    is preserved partially.

    Final aging by a conventional regime (490C, 3 h) gives

    rise to new kind of rev

    in the ( + ret

    )-structure (Fig. 2). It

    forms by epitaxial growth on ret

    [10, 13] at a temperature

    lower than that of the formation of the old rev

    . This is ex-

    Elevation of Reliability Characteristics of Maraging Steel 03N18K9M5T 551

  • plainable by the fact that the microvolumes of the -phase

    lying close to ret

    have an elevated content of nickel due to

    incomplete homogenization of the high-temperature -phase.

    The epitaxial nature of its nucleation is also a substantial

    factor.

    Crystals of the newly formed rev

    inherit particles of the

    hardening phase and, partially, the dislocation structure of

    the martensite, which is typical for reverse martensitic trans-

    formation [14]. The reverted austenite formed at a tempera-

    ture of 490C will be called reverted austenite II to differ-

    entiate it from reverted austenite I formed at 550C and

    higher temperatures. Thus, we may speak of three types of

    austenite, i.e., retained austenite, and two kinds of reverted

    austenite (I and II ).

    Figure 3 presents a diagram throwing light on formation

    of different types of austenite in steel 03N18K9M5T. The

    structure formed after the final aging (Fig. 3d ) represents a

    nanotriplex.

    Strength of Steel 03N18K9M5T with Different Types

    of Austenite

    We have already mentioned that the content of ret

    can be

    controlled by varying the hold of the metal in the austenitic

    range. The total content of austenite increases in subsequent

    aging due to formation of revII

    (Fig. 4).

    Evaluation of the strength of steel 03N18K9M4T in

    hardened condition at 0, 20, and 40% ret

    in its structure has

    shown that in all the three cases r

    1100 MPa and 0.2

    1000 MPa. This gives us grounds to assume that the strength

    characteristics of retained austenite and of unaged martensite

    are close to each other. The characteristics of ret

    obtained in

    our study are close to those presented in [4].

    552 V. P. Vylezhnev et al.

    0.3 m 0.3 m

    brevII

    ret

    Fig. 2. Structure of steel 03N18K9M5T against light (a) and dark (b )

    backgrounds.

    revI

    revII

    retret

    -phase

    -phase

    with reduced

    content of Ni

    -phase

    with elevated

    content of Ni

    c

    b

    d

    Fig. 3. Diagrams of formation of different types of austenite in steel

    03N18K9M5T: a) reverted austenite I due to hardening from the

    intercritical temperature range; b ) austenite formed due to rapid

    heating to 820C with a short hold (with reduced and elevated con-

    tent of Ni, respectively); c) retained austenite after rapid hardening

    from 820C; d ) reverted austenite II in the process of aging at

    490C.

    0.3 m

    0.3 m

    0.1 m

    b

    c

    revI

    Ni Ti3Fe Mo2

    Fig. 1. Reverted austenite in steel 03N18K9M5T after hardening

    from a temperature of the lower half of the intercritical range

    (600C): light (a) and dark (b ) backgrounds in (200)g

    reflex; re-

    verted austenite with intermetalides (indicated with arrows) inhe-

    rited from martensite (c).

  • It follows from the data of Fig. 5 that as a result of aging

    the strength of the specimens containing ret

    is lower than

    that of the control specimens (without ret

    ), which seems to

    be natural because aging process in martensite are known to

    be connected with formation of nanoparticles of a hardening

    Ni3Ti phase.

    Starting with the aging temperatures of 430 460C the

    total content of austenite in the structure of the steel in-

    creases due to formation of rev

    , but its strength does not de-

    crease. This indicates that the reverted austenite (revII

    ) pos-

    sesses higher strength than ret

    . Additional proofs of this can

    be obtained if we analyze the dependences of 0.2

    and r

    on

    the total content of austenite for the specimens aged at 490C

    (Fig. 6). Using the additivity rule we may estimate the yield

    strength of the austenite under the assumption that the yield

    strength of martensite in the steel with ( + ) structure is

    equal to 0.2

    of the steel with purely martensitic structure. As

    a result, we will see that the yield strength of the austenite

    (ret

    + rev

    ) decreases upon growth in its content at simulta-

    neous decrease in the fraction of rev

    . Since the fractions of

    retand

    revare known, we may use extrapolation and find as-

    sessed values of their yield strength, i.e., about 1000 and

    2000 MPa, respectively. Undoubtedly, these values are rank

    ones, but we may assume that the characteristics of the

    strength of rev

    are considerably higher than those of ret

    and

    are close to the strength of aged martensite. Such determina-

    tion of the strength of reverted austenite is applicable only to

    the case when the aging is carried out at 490C. For the tem-

    peratures below 490C such estimation is hard to perform

    due to the low amount of the formed rev

    . After aging at a

    temperature exceeding 500C (in the intercritical tempera-

    ture range) this is impossible, because the strength of the

    martensite aged at these temperatures is unknown. However,

    it is probable that at a temperature exceeding 500C the

    strength of rev

    is close to that of aged martensite, because the

    sizes and the type of the hardening phases are important fac-

    tors in this case too.

    It can be assumed in this connection that the softening

    observed at aging temperatures exceeding 500C is caused

    not by the content of austenite but rather by the processes of

    coagulation of the hardening phases and decrease in the den-

    sity of crystal structure defects.

    We may expect that the yield strength of retained austen-

    ite is determined by phase hardening, fineness of the crystals

    of ret

    , and partial preservation of the intermetallics. The

    considerable increase in the strength of reverted austenite is

    most probably caused by particles of the hardening phase in-

    herited by the austenite from aged martensite; such particles

    are detectable by an electron microscope study. Particles of

    hardening phase are seen especially well when the austenite

    forms at 550C and higher temperatures. The arrangement of

    the particles of the hardening phase in the - and -phases

    differs inconsiderably (see Fig. 2). It should be noted that at

    Elevation of Reliability Characteristics of Maraging Steel 03N18K9M5T 553

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0400 430 460 490 520 550 580

    2

    1

    revII

    revII

    rettot

    , %

    tag ,

    tot ret rev= + II

    Without

    aging

    Fig. 4. Dependence of the content of austenite in steel 03N18K9M5T

    with an initial martensite (1 ) and martensite-austenite (2 ) structure

    on the aging temperature.

    2200

    2000

    1800

    1600

    1400

    1200

    1000

    800

    Without

    aging

    2

    41

    3

    tag ,

    370 400 430 460 490 520 550 580 610

    r 0.2; , P

    Fig. 5. Effect of aging temperature on the rupture strength (1, 3 )

    and yield strength (2, 4 ) of steel 03N18K9M5T with an initial

    martensite (1, 2 ) and martensite-austenite (3, 4 ) structure.

    2200

    2000

    1800

    1600

    1400

    r 0.2; , P

    r

    0.2

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60

    tot , %

    Fig. 6. Rupture strength r

    and yield strength 0.2

    as a function of

    the total content of austenite in steel 03N18K9M5T.

  • aging temperature of 550C we can detect oval particles,

    most probably of a Fe2Mo phase.

    Fracture Resistance of Steel 03N18K9M5T

    upon Single Loading

    The characteristics of impact toughness and static crack

    resistance of the steel, as well as the strength characteristics,

    are determined not only by the total content of the -phase

    but also by the relative fraction of this or that austenite.

    In the whole of the studied range of aging temperatures

    the impact toughness of the control specimens (without ret

    )

    is 1.5 2 times lower than that of the specimens containing

    24% ret

    before aging (Fig. 7). The effect of ret

    on the resis-

    tance to crack propagation (parameter Js) is still inconsider-

    able; at 24% ret

    the value of Js

    is 3 times higher than in the

    specimens without ret

    .

    The impact toughness of the steel after tempering at

    490C increases virtually linearly from 0.5 to 1.0 MJm2

    upon growth in the content of retained austenite from 0

    to 30%.

    It should be noted that after aging at 490C the impact

    toughness of the metal with retained austenite does not de-

    crease despite the growth in the strength, whereas in the steel

    without ret

    is decreases considerably. At higher aging tem-

    peratures the impact toughness of the metal without ret

    does

    not increase despite the appearance of reverted austenite revI

    in the structure and the considerable softening (see Fig. 5)

    and increases only when the softening develops intensely (at

    tag

    > 550C). For this reason we may state that revI

    does not

    possess high toughness.

    The impact toughness of the steel containing ret

    starts to

    grow at lower aging temperatures. It follows from Fig. 4 that

    at such aging modes reverted austenite revII

    forms in the

    metal. It cannot be excluded that the appearance of one more

    phase with properties differing from those of the phases al-

    ready present in the structure increases the energy spent on

    the fracture additionally. The revII

    phase may also have a

    higher toughness (as compared to revI

    ). The reverted austen-

    ite formed at aging temperatures of 490C and below this

    value inherits highly dispersed particles of the hardening

    Ni3Ti phase responsible for the high strength of martensite in

    steel 03N18K9M5T. The reverted austenite formed at aging

    temperature of 500C and higher temperatures inherits

    coarser particles of Ni3Ti with less dispersity, as well as par-

    ticles of Fe2Mo appearing at such aging temperatures. It is

    possible that the difference in the natures of these particles

    (their dispersity and kind) is responsible for the differences

    in the levels of fracture resistance.

    The presence of different types of austenite in the struc-

    ture of steel 03N18K9M5T affects substantially the tempera-

    ture dependence of its impact toughness (Fig. 8a ). The im-

    pact toughness of the control specimens (without austenite)

    aged at 490C and of the specimens containing about 20%

    revIdecreases progressively upon decrease in the test tem-

    perature from 40C. This is connected with the fact that

    high-strength steels typically fracture by a low-energy duc-

    tile mechanism.

    The impact toughness of the steel with retained and re-

    verted (type II) austenite varies over a curve with a maxi-

    mum at ttest

    from + 20 to 40C (Fig. 8a ). This should be

    connected primarily with the fact that decrease in the tempe-

    rature is accompanied by increase in the resistance to plastic

    strain; while the fracture remains ductile, the fracture resis-

    tance increases.

    554 V. P. Vylezhnev et al.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    tag ,

    370 400 430 460 490 520 550 580 610

    1.4

    1.2

    1.0

    0.8

    0.6

    0.4

    0.2

    0.16

    0.14

    0.12

    0.10

    0.08

    0.06

    0.04

    KCU, J m 2 Jc2, J m

    Fig. 7. Effect of aging temperature on impact toughness KCU (1, 2 )

    and fracture toughness Js

    (3, 4 ) of steel 03N18K9M5T with an ini-

    tial martensite (1, 3 ) and martensite-austenite (2, 4 ) structure.

    1

    2

    2

    3

    3

    4

    4

    ttest ,

    ttest ,

    1.0

    0.8

    0.6

    0.4

    0.2

    0

    KCU, J m 2

    b

    200 100 0 100 200 300

    200 100 0 100 200 300

    100

    80

    60

    40

    20

    0

    n

    , %

    Fig. 8. Effect of test temperature on the impact toughness (a) and

    on the degree of transformation of austenite n

    (b ) of steel

    03N18K9M5T with different structures: 1 ) martensite + revI

    (40%);

    2 ) reverted austenite (40%); 3 ) martensite + ret

    (35%); 4 ) marten-

    site + ret

    (20%) + revII

    (20%).

  • In order to explain the results obtained we estimated the

    degree of the transformation of austenite in cooling up to the

    temperature of liquid nitrogen and in the process of testing

    for impact toughness. We established that ret

    and rev

    in steel

    03N18K9M5T have high thermal stability, because the con-

    tent of the austenite does not decrease in cooling up to the

    temperature of liquid nitrogen.

    At the same time, the stability of retained and reverted

    austenite under the action of plastic deformation differs

    (Fig. 8b ).

    Reverted austenite does not undergo transformation even

    when the tests for impact toughness are performed at the

    temperature of liquid nitrogen. Retained austenite begins to

    transform already at ttest

    = + 100C; at the temperature of li-

    quid nitrogen the degree of the transformation of retained

    austenite is 100%.

    In the metal with both types of austenite (% rev

    % ret

    )

    subjected to impact testing in liquid nitrogen the degree of

    the transformation is about 60%. Therefore, we may state

    that the strain-induced transformation in steel

    03N18K9M5T concerns only the retained austenite, whereas

    the reverted austenite fractures without transformation. We

    may name the following causes of increase in the impact

    toughness of the steel with retained austenite:

    load-induced transformation of retained austenite into

    unaged austenite with high toughness;

    spending of energy for the transformation;

    appearance of a phase with high specific volume in the

    transformation.

    In order to study the micromechanisms of fracture of

    steel 03N18K9M5T with different types of austenite we per-

    formed an electron analysis of fracture surfaces, some of the

    results of which are presented in Fig. 9. We studied the struc-

    ture of the central parts of fracture surfaces of impact speci-

    mens tested at + 250, + 20, and 196C. On the fracture sur-

    faces of specimens with martensite structure fractured at

    250C we observed only dimples. The depth of the dimples

    was low. This reflects the relatively low energy capacity of

    the ductile fracture of such specimens. Lowering of the test

    temperature to room values gives rise to quasi-cleavage fac-

    ets on the fracture surfaces in addition to the dimples. After

    testing in liquid nitrogen quasi-cleavage facets become a

    dominant component on the fracture surfaces of specimens

    with martensite structure.

    On fractures of steel 03N18K9M5T containing retained

    austenite, which have formed at ttest

    = + 250C, the micro-

    scopic relief is represented by dimples. However, we should

    note that in addition to small shallow dimples typical for

    fracture surfaces of specimens with purely martensite struc-

    ture, we observed in this case large deep cone-shaped dim-

    ples 10 15 m in size, which determine the high level of

    impact toughness of the steel bearing ret

    .

    When ttest

    is decreased to + 20C, the ductile fracture pat-

    tern is preserved on the whole. We should mention only the

    appearance of individual facets surrounded by high ridges of

    microplastic strain. Inside these facets we observe a deve-

    loped regular infrastructure.

    Testing at the temperature of liquid nitrogen makes the

    facets surrounded by high ridges of microplastic strain,

    which often form a closed net, the dominant component of

    the texture. Judging by the distance between the ridges,

    which is equal to 20 40 m, we may assume that they form

    over boundaries of former austenite grains. Inside the facets

    we observe an exceptionally developed infrastructure repre-

    sented by regularly arranged and often almost parallel steps

    or ridges (Fig. 9a ). Since in this case the degree of the

    strain-induced transformation attains 100%, we may

    infer that this infrastructure has formed as a result of a

    strain-induced transformation of retained austenite into

    martensite (Fig. 8b ).

    In the case when the steel contains both types of austen-

    ite, a dimple texture dominates on fracture surfaces for any

    test temperature. At ttest

    = + 20C a microrelief in the form of

    protrusions or tongues can be observed on the surfaces of

    cone dimples. At the temperature of liquid nitrogen cone

    dimples are more rare but there appear cleavage plateaus

    with a similar microrelief over slip planes (Fig. 9b ). It can-

    not be excluded that this microrelief is nothing else but a

    trace of a strain-induced transformation of ret

    under the con-

    ditions of predominantly ductile fracture.

    Fracture Resistance of Steel 03N18K9M5T

    under Cyclic Loading

    The results of the tests for cyclic crack resistance pre-

    sented in Fig. 10 show that the presence of this or that type of

    austenite in the structure of the high-strength steel raises the

    resistance to fatigue crack growth, which is especially no-

    ticeable when the rate of crack growth is determined at a

    fixed value of the amplitude of the stress intensity factor K.

    This effect is especially noticeable in the near-threshold re-

    gion. The highest level of threshold values of K (Kth

    ) is

    observed when the structure of the steel contains reverted

    austenite; as the value of K increases, the differences in the

    Elevation of Reliability Characteristics of Maraging Steel 03N18K9M5T 555

    10 m 10 m b

    Fig. 9. Fracture surfaces after testing impact specimens of steel

    03N18K9M5T with different structures in liquid nitrogen: a) mar-

    tensite + 23% ret

    ; b ) martensite + 23% ret

    + 23% revII

    .

  • cyclic crack resistance of steel 03N18K9M5T with structures

    of martensite and martensite with different types of austenite

    become progressively lower. Computation of exponent n in

    the Paris equation shows that in the steel studied the value of

    n changes little and ranges within 2.3 2.7. Therefore, we

    may state that within the Paris segment of the diagrams of

    cyclic crack resistance one and the same fatigue micro-

    mechanism of crack growth is implemented independently of

    the structural state of the steel.

    Tables 1 and 2 present the results of the determination of

    parameters characterizing the fracture resistance under im-

    pact cyclic loading of the steel containing austenite and bear-

    ing no austenite. In the metal aged for maximum strength the

    rate of crack growth is lower than in the metal in an overaged

    condition. Reverted austenite lowers the rate of crack growth

    under impact cyclic loading but decreases the number of cy-

    cles before failure. The best results on the impact crack resis-

    tance (the largest number of cycles before failure) and the

    lowest rate of crack growth) have been observed after aging

    at 430C (the structure of the steel contains only retained

    austenite).

    CONCLUSIONS

    1. The structure of maraging steel 03N18K9M5T can

    consist of martensite and retained and reverted (two types)

    austenite depending on the heat treatment.

    2. Retained austenite has a yield strength close to that of

    unaged martensite (0.2

    1000 MPa), whereas the yield

    strength of reverted austenite is close to that of aged (for

    maximum strength) martensite (0.2

    2000 MPa). The high

    difference in the strength levels of the different types of aus-

    tenite should be associated with the fact that the reverted aus-

    556 V. P. Vylezhnev et al.

    TABLE 1. Ultimate Rupture Strength, Impact Toughness, and Resistance to Low-Cycle Impact Fatigue of Steel

    03N18K9M5T after Aging

    Initial

    structure*tag

    , C r, MPa

    KCU,

    MJm2

    N1

    , cycle N2

    , cycle Ntot

    , cycle N1

    , cycle N2

    , cycle Ntot

    , cycle

    max= 1650 MPa

    max= 2600 MPa

    490 2100 0.45 15,628 7073 22,701 2971 1100 4071

    550 1750 0.51 12,916 7590 20,516 2422 1308 3730

    + ret

    430 1800 0.93 16,494 7633 24,127 2650 1495 4145

    + ret

    490 19,000 0.90 14,283 8280 22,563 2364 1668 4032

    *Before aging.

    Notations: tag

    ) aging temperature; N1, N

    2) periods of nucleation and propagation of fatigue crack, respectively; N

    tot) total

    number of cycles before failure, Ntot

    = N1

    + N2.

    TABLE 2. Empirical Dependences of the Crack Growth Rate in

    Steel 03N18K9M5T with Different Structural States under Cyclic

    Impact Loading

    Initial

    structuretag

    , CStructure

    after aging

    Rate of crack growth dldN,mcycle, at a stress

    max, MPa

    1650 2600

    490 Martensite + in-

    termetallics

    5.68 10 7

    l 27.1 10 7

    l

    550 + 22%

    rev5.17 10

    7l 23.3 10

    7l

    + ret

    430 + 24%

    ret5.46 10

    7l 26.4 10

    7l

    + ret

    490 + 24%

    ret+

    15% rev

    5.05 10 7

    l 23.6 10 7

    l

    Note. The rate of crack growth was determined at a crack length of

    up to l = 3.2 mm.

    1

    2 3

    4

    v, m cycle

    K, P m1 2

    3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60

    108

    6

    4

    2

    7

    6

    4

    2

    1086

    4

    2

    8

    1086

    4

    2

    9

    10 10

    Fig. 10. Diagrams of cyclic crack resistance (v = dldt is the rate

    of crack growth, K is amplitude of the stress intensity factor) of

    steel 03N18K9M5T with different structures: 1 ) martensite (without

    austenite); 2 ) martensite + 30% ret

    ; 3 ) martensite + 23% ret

    +

    23% revII

    ; 4 ) martensite + 40% revI

    .

  • tenite inherits the dispersed intermetallics formed as a result

    of aging of the martensite.

    3. The presence of about equal fractions of both types of

    austenite (about 20% ret

    and about 20% revII

    ) in steel

    03N18K9M5T at a high strength level (0.2

    = 1800

    1900 MPa) provides high impact toughness (KCU = 1.0

    1.2 MJm2 ) and static (Js

    = 160 180 MPa m12 ) and cy-

    clic crack resistance.

    4. The high level of cold resistance of steel 03N18K9M5T,

    the structure of which bears both types of austenite, is pro-

    vided by a strain-induced transformation of retained austen-

    ite, while the reverted austenite remains untransformed.

    5. Under cyclic loading the reverted and retained austen-

    ite lowers the crack growth rate in the initial stage of crack

    development (at low values of the amplitude of the stress in-

    tensity factor).

    6. The properties of the reverted austenite are largely de-

    termined by the temperature of its formation. The reverted

    austenite formed at 490C and lower temperatures (revII

    ) has

    a higher set of mechanical properties than the reverted aus-

    tenite formed above 500C (revI

    ).

    REFERENCES

    1. M. D. Perkas and V. M. Kardonskii, High-Strength Maraging

    Steels [in Russian], Metallurgiya, Moscow (1970), 224 p.

    2. S. S. Ryzhak, L. N. Belyakov, Ya. M. Potak, et al., Some regu-

    lar features of phase transformations in steel 000N18K9M5T,

    Metalloved. Term. Obrab. Met., No. 2, 55 60 (1972).

    3. S. D. Antolovich, A. Saxena, and G. R. Chanani, Increased

    fracture toughness in a 300 grade maraging steel as a result of

    thermal cycling, Metall. Trans., 5(3), 623 632 (1974).

    4. S. B. Nizhnik, S. P. Doroshenko, and G. I. Usikova, Effect of

    hardening temperature on the development of transfor-

    mation and mechanical properties of maraging steel, Fiz. Met.

    Metalloved., 56(2), 327 33 (1983).

    5. V. P. Vylezhnev, A. A. Sukhikh, V. G. Bragin, et al., Formation

    of austenite and its structure in maraging steel N18K9M5T, in:

    Problems of Mechanics and Physical Metallurgy [in Russian],

    IPM UrO RAN, Izhevsk (1994), pp. 118 133.

    6. V. M. Shchastlitsev, I. L. Barmina, and I. L. Yakovleva, Forma-

    tion and stability of reverted austenite in low-carbon nickel-mo-

    lybdenum steels, Fiz. Met. Metalloved., 53(2), 316 322

    (1983).

    7. V. P. Vylezhnev, Yu. N. Simonov, A. A. Sukhikh, and V. G. Bra-

    gin, Retained and reverted austenite in maraging steel

    03N18K9M5T, in: Proc. Int. Conf. Ferrous Metallurgy in the

    CIS Countries in the XXI Century [in Russian], Moscow

    (1994), Vol. 5, pp. 200 201.

    8. RD 50-34582 Specification, Strength Computations and Tests.

    Methods of Mechanical Testing of Metals. Determination of

    Crack Resistance Characteristics (Fracture Toughness) under

    Cyclic Loading [in Russian], Izd. Standartov, Moscow (1983),

    96 p.

    9. I. V. Pestov, V. A. Ostapchenko, M. D. Perkas, et al., Kinetics

    of crack growth in maraging and medium-carbon steels under

    low-cycle fatigue, Metalloved. Term. Obrab. Met., No. 7,

    6 11 (1977).

    10. V. I. Zeldovich and N. Yu. Frolova, Effect of heating rate on

    the process of formation of austenite and recrystallization of

    maraging steel, Fiz. Met. Metalloved., No. 2, 178 185

    (1990).

    11. K. A. Malyshev, V. V. Sagaradze, I. P. Fokin, et al., Phase

    Hardening of Austenitic Iron-Nickel-Base Alloys [in Russia],

    Nauka, Moscow (1982), 260 p.

    12. V. V. Sagaradze, N. L. Pecherina, T. P. Vasechkina, and I. G. Ka-

    banova, Inherited substructure of -phase in austenite and ap-

    pearance of new dislocations in bcc fcc transformation, in:

    High-Strength Austenitic Steels [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow

    (1987), pp. 120 126.

    13. V. P. Vylezhnev, A. A. Sukhikh, V. G. Bragin, and S. A. Koko-

    vyakina, Mechanical properties of maraging steel N18K9M5T

    with retained and reverted austenite, Fiz. Met. Metalloved.,

    75(4), 157 165 (1993).

    14. A. N. Belikov, N. L. Nikolskaya, and S. S. Ryzhak,

    Transformation in maraging steel N18K9M5T, Metalloved.

    Term. Obrab. Met., No. 6, 26 32 (1968).

    Elevation of Reliability Characteristics of Maraging Steel 03N18K9M5T 557

    AbstractKey wordsINTRODUCTIONMETHODS OF STUDYRESULTS AND DISCUSSIONStructure of Steel 03N18K9M5T with Different Types of AusteniteStrength of Steel 03N18K9M5T with Different Types of AusteniteFracture Resistance of Steel 03N18K9M5T upon Single LoadingFracture Resistance of Steel 03N18K9M5T under Cyclic Loading

    CONCLUSIONSREFERENCES

    /ColorImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorImageDict > /AntiAliasGrayImages false /DownsampleGrayImages true /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 150 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict > /GrayImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayImageDict > /AntiAliasMonoImages false /DownsampleMonoImages true /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 600 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict > /AllowPSXObjects false /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile (None) /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName (http://www.color.org?) /PDFXTrapped /False

    /SyntheticBoldness 1.000000 /Description >>> setdistillerparams> setpagedevice