1
24 THE BUDDHIST TRADITION “If that’s the case, your Majesty, you had no mother or father, and no teachers in learning, manners, or wisdom. . . . Is the boy who goes to school one [being] and the young man who has finished his education another? Does one person commit a crime and another suffer mutilation for it?” “Of course not, your Reverence! But what do you say on the question?” “I am the being I was when I was a baby,” said the Elder . . . “for through the continuity of the body all stages of life are included in a pragmatic unity.” “Give me an illustration.” “Suppose a man were to light a lamp, would it bum all through the night?” “Yes, it might.” “Now is the flame which burns in the middle watch the same as that which burned in the first?” “No, your Rev- erence.” “Or is that which burns in the last watch the same as that which burned in the middle?” “No, your Reverence.” “So is there one lamp in the first watch, another in the middle, and yet another m the last?” “No. The same lamp gives light all through the night.” “Similarly, your Majesty, the continuity of phenomena is kept up. One person comes into existence, another passes away, and the sequence rans continuously without self- conscious existence, neither the same nor yet another.” “W ell said. Reverend Nagasena!” [From MilindapaUbat (Tienckner ed.),p.40] The Process of Rebirth In this little passage NSgasena presses the analogy of the lamp fur- ther, and shows Menander how rebirth is possible without any soul, substratum of personality, or other hypothetical entity which passes from the one body to the other. “Reverend Nagasena,” said the King, “is it trae that nothing transmigrates, and yet there is rebirth?” “Yes, your Majesty.” “How can this be? . . . Give me an illustration.” IL.

47_dbbtdbbt.pdf

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 47_dbbtdbbt.pdf

24 THE B UDDHI S T T R A D I T I ON

“ If th a t’s the case, your M ajesty, you had no m other or father, and no teachers in learning, m anners, or wisdom. . . . Is th e boy who goes to school one [being] and the young m an who has finished his education another? Does one person com m it a crim e and another suffer m utilation for it?”

“O f course not, your Reverence! B ut w hat do you say on the question?”

“ I am the being I was when I was a baby,” said th e Elder . . . “ for through the continuity of th e body all stages of life are included in a pragm atic unity .”

“ Give m e an illustration.”“Suppose a m an were to light a lam p, would it bu m all

through the n ight?” “Yes, it m ight.”“Now is the flame which burns in the m iddle watch the

same as th a t which burned in the first?” “N o, your Rev­erence.”

“O r is th a t which burns in th e last watch the same as th a t which burned in the m iddle?” “N o, your Reverence.”

“So is there one lam p in th e first watch, ano ther in the m iddle, and yet ano ther m the last?”

“N o. T h e same lam p gives light all through the n igh t.” “Similarly, your Majesty, the continuity of phenom ena is

kep t up. O ne person comes in to existence, another passes away, an d th e sequence rans continuously w ithout self- conscious existence, neither the same nor yet another.”

“W ell said. Reverend Nagasena!”[FromMilindapaUbat (Tienckner e d .) ,p .40]

The Process of Rebirth

In this little passage NSgasena presses the analogy of the lamp fur­ther, and shows Menander how rebirth is possible without any soul, substratum of personality, or other hypothetical entity which passes from the one body to the other.

“Reverend N agasena,” said th e King, “ is i t trae th a t nothing transm igrates, and yet there is rebirth?”

“Yes, your M ajesty.”“H ow can this be? . . . G ive m e an illustration.”

IL.