Upload
claudia-rivera
View
22
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
40G is coming! What is fact – what is Hype? Status Quo in Standardization. Gerd Backhaus Marketing Manager D-A-CH. Agenda. Cabling in DCs Topology , requirements , trends Lessons learned from 10G …40G over twisted pair!... how ? Requirements / proposals from IEEE, ISO/IEC, TIA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Date et page . 1Nexans Cabling Solutions
40G is coming!What is fact – what is Hype?Status Quo in Standardization
Gerd BackhausMarketing Manager D-A-CH
Date et page . 2
Agenda
• Cabling in DCs
• Topology, requirements, trends
• Lessons learned from 10G• …40G over twisted pair!...how?
• Requirements/proposals from IEEE, ISO/IEC, TIA
• Which connector?
Date et page . 3
40GBase-T…what‘s going on?
Cat 8?Cat 8.1?Cat 8.2?
Channel I ?Channel II ?1600 MHz?2000 MHz?
Date et page . 4
IEEE 802.3an10GBase-T
ISO/IEC 11801Cat.5, 6, 6A, 7 + 7A
Class D-E-EA-F-FA
Cenelec EN50173Cat.5, 6, 6A, 7 + 7A
Class D-E-EA-F-FA
TIA 568.C.2Cat.5, 6, 6A
Standardization committees(examples)
Date et page . 5
10G Cu.-Cabling requirementsfor data centers
ISO 24764
“6.2.2 Balanced cabling
The main distribution and zone distribution cabling shall be designed to provide a minimum of Class EA channel performance as specified in ISO/IEC 11801.”
Component Choice for Twisted Pair: Category 6A components provide Class EA
balanced cabling performance;
Category 7 components provide Class F balanced cabling performance;
Category 7A components provide Class FA
balanced cabling performance.
TIA-942
“ 7.3.4 Recognized media (for DCs)
· 4-pair 100-ohm balanced twisted-pair cable (ANSI/TIA-568-C.2) – category 6 or category 6A, with category 6A recommended”
Component Choice for Twisted Pair: Category 6A components provide
balanced cabling performance;
Date et page . 6
UTP cabling requires Alien Xtalk Tests
Cat6A F/UTP Test Very good headroom
Cat6A U/UTP Test Close to the limits
Test configuration: 2-C link, 6&1 bundle, length 50m/each, tight bundle, no patch cordsCat.6A U/UTP makes a complex (expensive)
chip-architecture necesarry!
Date et page . 7
DC CablingTOR vs. EOR
• Switch at the end of Row• Connection to Server via 2 Connector / 3
Connector Twisted Pair Cabling Channel (20-30m) • More Cabling , Fewer Switches• Benefits:
• Interoperability of Equipment by use of internationally standardised copper cabling
• Allows all topologies• Less expensive to Upgrade if correctly
designed• Disadvantages
• Amount of Cables (depend on Topology used)• Scalability (depends on cabling grade used)
• Switch in each Server Rack (or adjacent) connected via Fibre Uplinks
• Connection to Server via Fibre or Copper Patch Cord (1-2m) or very short CC Link (3m)
• Less Cabling, More Switches• Benefits:
• Scalable (with exchange of TOR switch) • Little Cabling (48 Fibres to a Rack)
• Disadvantage• Oversubscription• Upgrade Cost• Congestion when IntraRack traffic
TOREOR
Date et page . 9
Another aspect…Required distances in DCs
In DCs shorter lengths are dominant>80% of the lengths are not longer then 30m
Date et page . 10
Lessons learned from 10G
Date et page . 11
Lessons learned from 10G
Lessons from 10G Lessons for 40G
100m reach not required Reduce reach to match market requirement <50m
UTP Cable spec – Noise Sensititivy took time to overcome
Shielded cable – ANEXT problem eliminated
High PHY power consumption – Required 3 generations of silicon
Reduce PHY power – less distance and less compensation : Positive ACR for increased frequency
Window of opportunity missed (6 years) – enabled TOR
Use current generation of silicon: reduces time to market
Date et page . 12
IEEE expectations for 40G
Group Spirit best expressed by http://www.ieee802.org/3/bq/public/may13/booth_01_0513_40GBT
Former project manager for 10GBase-T Leader of AD-HOC Channel Modelling
IEEE802.3bq Working Group
Date et page . 13
40GBase-T challenges…
1313
Higher coding
complexity
Rel. lower frequencie
s
Lower attenuatio
n
Longer Reach
Complex chip
design/costs
Cabling related!
Lower coding
complexity
Higher frequencie
s
Higher attenuatio
n
Shorter Reach
Energy costs
Date et page . 14
Which cabling system willsupport 40G
and...Is TIA Cat8 better than
ISO Cat7A?
Date et page . 15
TP components for 40G
TP Definition started in September 2012
4 pairs cable, not multilane High Density: 48 ports/HU Speed: 40G 2 connector link only No support of 100m distance -> 30m
Date et page . 16
TIA Next gen / „US Cat.8“ACR for length of 30m
• Cat 8 Positive ACR up to 800 MHz• Cat 7A/CH II Positive ACR up to 2000Mhz
20
TIA Cat 8 -> positive ACR up to 800 MHzCat 7A enhancend/CHII/8.2 -> positive ACR up to 2000MHz
Date et page . 17
BIG SURPRISE AT TIA MEETING,JUNE 2013:
During its meeting the week of June 17, the TIA TR-42.7 Copper Cabling Subcommittee “accepted the concept of adding ISO/IEC Class II cabling performance criteria” into its pending ANSI/TIA-568-C.2-1 category 8 project!!!
Date et page . 18
ISO/IEC ISO/IEC Is similar to… TIA channel/
channel components components
Class E Cat 6 Cat 6
Class EA Cat 6A Cat 6A
Class I Cat 8.1* Cat 8*
Class FA Cat 7A (no couterpart)
Class II Cat 8.2 Class II
Comparison: Classes/CategoriesTIA vs ISO/IEC
*Category 8.1 and TIA Cat.8 are NOT backward compatible to Class FA
Date et page . 19
Parameter TIA Cat 8 ISO Class I ISO Class II Difference
(at 1GHz in dB) (RJ45) (RJ45)(GG45…
Tera)TIA Cat 8 vs Cl
II
Return loss 8 8 8
Insertion Loss 22 22,5 21,1 0,9
PS-NEXT 16,5 16,6 44,9 28,4
PS-ACRF 9 9 30,1 21,1
PS-ANEXT 70 70 70
PS-AACRF 41 41 41
Comparison of different proposalsTIA vs ISO/IEC
ISO is equal or more performant then TIA in Class I alreadyAnd looking at Class II….this is a much higher league!
Date et page . 20
Which connector will make the
running?
Date et page . 21
Three different variants:
1.) RJ45 (enhanced) – IEC 60603-7-812.) Tera (enhanced) – IEC 61076-3-104, Ed.33.) GG45 (enhanced) – IEC 60603-7-82
IEC 60603-7-82 is supported by:
• Belstewart (ARJ45)
• Panduit (S-RJ45)
• Nexans (GG45)
(Panduit)
POSSIBLE CONNECTORS FOR 40G
Date et page . 22
Eight RJ45 pins100% Class D/E/EA
backward compatible
Four additional GG45™ highspeed pins
for Class F/ FA
GG45™ Interface
GG45™ - functionallity
Date et page . 23
Components for 40G ?
connector:• IEC60603-71
cable: • Cat.7A S/FTP cable• 1000/1200/1600 MHz
Date et page . 24
= Cat.7A cable with GG45 jacks
= Cat.5, 6 or 6A patch cords with RJ45
10G
10G
today:Equipment requiresRJ45 connections
Migration path with GG45
Date et page . 25
40G
40G
In future:New 40G hardware...connected with GG45 cords
= Cat.7A cable with GG45 jacks
= Cat.7A patch cords with GG45 plugs
Migration path with GG45
Date et page . 26
I. Concluding considerations to 40G
IEEE probably will make decision for 40GBase-t this yearISO and TIA will follow later (2015?)
Design around length <30m
Copper cabling enables EEE savings
Todays Cat7A are often better then then required due to the standards
GG45 is tried and tested since years – and is the most elegant way for a 40G migration
Date et page . 27
…extended drive distances…more than 30m?
…let‘s see what the industry will offer in the future
Will Channel II/Cat 8.2 support 100m for 10G …of course!
II. Concluding considerations to 40G
Date et page . 28
Test set up
Date et page . 29
Further Informations:
Please find our white papers and other info here:
www.nexans.co.uk/lansystems
Thanks for listening?Questions???
Date et page . 30
Workshop
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GT9Af7W5IPI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=up636JoRF4k