Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
A Randomized Experiment of Slum Housing Upgrading
Sebas'an Galiani -‐ University of Washington St Louis Paul Gertler – UC Berkeley Ryan Cooper – JPAL Sebas'án Mar'nez -‐ IDB Adam Ross – World Bank Raimundo Undurraga -‐ JPAL
Introduc;on • In this paper reporte on a randomized evalua'on of Un Techo Para Mi País in El Salvador and Uruguay (the final paper will also include Mexico).
• Un Techo Para Mi País (UTPMP) is a youth-‐led program which provides basic pre-‐fabricated houses to extreme poor popula'ons in La'n America.
• The main objec've of the program is to improve household well-‐being and increase the beneficiary household's probability of exi'ng extreme poverty.
Introduc;on • UTPMP targets the poorest informal seUlements and the households within these seUlements that live in sub-‐standard housing (typically homes made of waste materials such as cardboard, 'n and plas'c, with dirt floors and lacking basic services such as water and sewage) and provides a basic housing structure.
Program
• UTPMP began opera'ons thirteen years ago in Chile, and currently works in fourteen addi'onal La'n American countries including Argen'na, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Peru and Uruguay.
• UTPMP has helped build over 43,000 houses and worked with more than 190,000 volunteers in 15 countries throughout LAC.
Program • The UTPMP houses are made of wood or aluminum. A typical house is 18 m2 (6*3) in size and is built by teams of youth volunteers along with the household recipient.
• On average, the houses take one to two days to build by a team of 6-‐12 people.
House built in El Salvador
House built in Mexico
Program
• The cost of each transi'onal house is around US $1,000.
• The design of the house is meant to be low cost, easy to construct and mobile. The house can be easily disassembled and moved to a new loca'on. The purpose of this is to deal with the fact that most of the households in informal seUlements do not have formal 'tle to the land they live on.
Experimental Design
• The study exploits randomiza'on of treatment at the household level within seUlements (clusters).
• Elegible households were then randomly assigned to the treatment and control groups within each seUlement.
Experimental Design
• Baseline survey in two waves:
• Treatment alloca'on right ager baseline survey.
• Follow up survey, 18 months laUer.
Table 1. General Information a
El Salvador Uruguay
Observations Treatment
Observations Control Mean Differences Observations
Treatment Observations
Control Mean Differences
General Information
Households by Group
421 277
433 346
60.32% 39.68% 55.58% 44.42%
Individuals by Group
2,111 1,363
1,872 1,454
60.77% 39.23% 56.28% 43.72% Compliers 369 275 407 299 87.65% 99.28% 94.00% 86.42% Attritors 19 16 26 25 4.51% 5.78% 6.00% 7.23% Attrition Rates 0.045 0.058 -0.013 0.060 0.072 -0.012
(0.012) (0.016) (0.017) (0.011) (0.010) (0.013)
(0.010) (0.014) (0.016) (0.011) (0.013) (0.017)
a Reported Results: Number of observations and percentage. For Attrition Rates, the coefficient, "clustered" standard error (23 clusters for El Salvador and 12 clusters for Uruguay) and standard error are reported.
*Significantly different from 0 at 10-percent level. **Significantly different from 0 at 5-percent level. ***Significantly different from 0 at 1-percent level.
Table 3b. Differences in Pre-Treatment Means. Treatment vs Control. Baseline Survey. a El Salvador Uruguay
Variables
Total Observations
Mean Control
Mean Differences
Mean Differences w/settlement
dummies
Total Observations
Mean Control
Mean Differences
Mean Differences w/settlement
dummies
Satisfaction with Quality of House and Life Satisfaction with Floor Quality 697 0.116 0.018 0.018 778 0.188 -0.021 -0.019 (0.027) (0.025) (0.027) (0.028) (0.027) (0.029) Satisfaction with Wall Quality 696 0.083 0.012 0.004 778 0.121 0.001 -0.001 (0.023) (0.021) (0.025) (0.019) (0.023) (0.026) Satisfaction with Roof Quality 696 0.091 0.026 0.008 778 0.185 -0.037 -0.025 (0.023) (0.023) (0.026) (0.019) (0.027) (0.028) Satisfaction with House Protection against Water when it rains 696 0.090 0.012 -0.005
777 0.180 -0.022 -0.014
(0.026) (0.022) (0.025) (0.018) (0.027) (0.029) Satisfaction with Quality of Life 695 0.181 0.085 0.025 767 0.228 -0.009 -0.016 (0.034) (0.031)*** (0.033) (0.037) (0.030) (0.032) Perception of Security Safe inside the house during the last 12 months (=1) 698 0.538 -0.011 -0.045
779 0.590 0.032 0.030
(0.033) (0.038) (0.043) (0.035) (0.035) (0.037) Safe leaving the house alone during the last 12 months (=1) 698 0.419 0.016 -0.011
779 0.295 0.022 0.030
(0.036) (0.038) (0.043) (0.030) (0.033) (0.035) Safe leaving the kids alone in the house during the last 12 months (=1)
698 0.166 -0.019 -0.049
779 0.121 0.029 0.015
(0.022) (0.028) (0.032) (0.015) (0.024) (0.026) House robbed in the last 12 months (=1) 697 0.036 0.042 0.053
776 0.272 0.008 -0.013
(0.011) (0.017)** (0.020)** (0.032) (0.032) (0.032) a On material of rooms, were only included those households that reported information for all rooms. On monetary variables, observations over p99 were not considered. On hours worked, cases that reported more than 84 hours were not considered. Reported Results: Standard errors clustered at survey-block level shown in parentheses (23 clusters for El Salvador and 12 clusters for Uruguay) and standard error are reported in that order. Data source: 2007 - 2008 UTPMP Baseline data *Significantly at 10% level. **Significantly at 5% level. ***Significantly at 1% level
Table 3a. Differences in Pre-Treatment Means. Treatment vs Control. Baseline Survey. a El Salvador Uruguay
Variables
Total Observations
Mean Control
Mean Differences
Mean Differences w/
settlement dummies
Total Observations
Mean Control
Mean Differences
Mean Differences w/settlement
dummies
Characteristics of the House Number of Rooms 698 2.350 0.13 -0.141 779 2.659 0.013 0.066 (0.084) (0.089) (0.095) (0.048) (0.095) (0.104) Share of Rooms with Dirty Floors 692 0.857 0.00 0.039 749 0.361 0.005 -0.015 (0.024) (0.019) (0.021) * (0.021) (0.032) (0.033) Share of Rooms with Low Quality Walls 695 0.920 -0.039 0.006 560 0.692 -0.015 -0.043
(0.016) (0.017)** (0.015) (0.070) (0.037) (0.039) Share of Rooms with Low Quality Roofs 689 0.999 0.000 -0.001 749 0.991 0.004 0.006
(0.001) (0.001) (0.002) (0.005) (0.005) (0.006) Share of Rooms with Window 697 0.179 -0.03 0.002 773 0.583 -0.029 -0.025 (0.022) (0.021) (0.024) (0.030) (0.028) (0.029) Water Connection (=1) 698 0.195 0.03 -0.033 777 0.908 0.014 0.018 (0.052) (0.031) (0.030) (0.016) (0.020) (0.021) Sink on Room where food is prepared (=1) 694 0.007 0.01 0.002 768 0.253 0.002 0.024
(0.008) (0.007) (0.010) (0.019) (0.031) (0.034) Room where food is prepared is also used as Bedroom (=1) 693 0.327 -0.02 0.055 766 0.447 -0.028 -0.012
(0.072) (0.036) (0.039) (0.030) (0.036) (0.038) Electricity Connection (=1) 698 0.386 0.01 -0.063 779 0.957 0.004 0.004 (0.071) (0.037) (0.038) (0.008) (0.014) (0.015) Use Gas Stove or Kerosene to Cook (=1) 698 0.141 0.05 0.010 779 0.468 -0.027 -0.030
(0.028) (0.028)* (0.030) (0.061) (0.035) (0.037) Own Toilet (=1) 698 0.448 0.06 -0.056 779 0.598 0.065 0.058 (0.050) (0.038) (0.042) (0.036) (0.034)* (0.036) a On material of rooms, were only included those households that reported information for all rooms. On monetary variables, observations over p99 were not considered. Reported Results: Standard errors clustered at survey-block level shown in parentheses (23 clusters for El Salvador and 12 clusters for Uruguay) and standard error are reported in that order. Data source: 2007 - 2008 UTPMP Baseline data *Significantly at 10% level. **Significantly at 5% level. ***Significantly at 1% level
Table 3b. Differences in Pre-Treatment Means. Treatment vs Control. Baseline Survey. a
El Salvador Uruguay
Variables
Total Observations
Mean Control
Mean Differences
Mean Differences w/settlement
dummies
Total Observations
Mean Control
Mean Differences
Mean Differences w/settlement
dummies
Sociodemographic Characteristics
HH Members 698 4.921 0.094 -0.040 779 4.202 0.121 0.087 (0.166) (0.187) (0.233) (0.133) (0.173) (0.191) Head of HH's Age 695 44.227 0.811 0.129 750 37.314 0.906 1.203 (1.787) (1.303) (1.555) (0.559) (1.026) (1.108) Head of HH's Gender (1=Man) 698 0.769 0.029 0.028 753 0.537 -0.036 -0.043 (0.018) (0.032) (0.036) (0.024) (0.036) (0.038) Head of HH's Education Level (higher value, higher education) 678 2.319 0.190 -0.048
734 8.314 -0.352 -0.190
(0.246) (0.223) (0.243) (0.685) (0.493) (0.530) Spouse's Age 252 41.598 0.898 -0.779 179 38.872 -2.013 -2.108 (1.542) (1.936) (2.420) (1.513) (2.036) (2.200) Spouse's Education Level (higher value, higher education) 249 1.677 0.270 0.211
178 9.634 -0.598 0.032
(0.201) (0.316) (0.341) (0.498) (1.066) (1.165) Hours worked last week by Head of HH (including Secondary job) 507 32.811 3.611 2.253
658 31.956 -1.071 -1.280
(1.482) (2.112)* (2.457) (1.567) (1.907) (2.056) Hours worked last week by Spouse (including Secondary job) 220 9.885 -2.893 -1.847
165 22.000 -2.835 -0.416
(3.127) (2.447) (2.940) (2.991) (3.733) (4.319) Health (<5 years old) Respiratory Disease during last 4 weeks (=1)
424 0.635 0.035 0.042
623 0.360 -0.014 -0.050
(0.035) (0.475) (0.056) (0.037) (0.038) (0.044) Diarrhea during last 4 weeks (=1) 424 0.144 0.105 0.043
624 0.083 0.009 -0.014
(0.017) (0.038)*** (0.042) (0.016) (0.022) (0.024) a On material of rooms, were only included those households that reported information for all rooms. On monetary variables, observations over p99 were not considered. On hours worked, cases that reported more than 84 hours were not considered. Reported Results: Standard errors clustered at survey-block level shown in parentheses (23 clusters for El Salvador and 12 clusters for Uruguay) and standard error are reported in that order. Data source: 2007 - 2008 UTPMP Baseline data. *Significantly at 10% level. **Significantly at 5% level. ***Significantly at 1% level
Table 4: Differences of Means between groups El Salvador a
Variable
(1) Mean of Observations
Non Poor (EHPM 2008)
(2) Mean of Observations National Poor
(EHPM 2008) b
(3) Mean of Observations Settlements
(UTPMP 2007-08)
Dif (2)-(3) Dif (2)-(3)c
Income Indicators (HH) Total Income PC 401.950 45.838 64.175 -18.337 -22.647 (6.894) (0.467) (6.806) (6.802)*** (7.162)*** % of Wage Work 0.457 0.511 0.458 0.053 0.042 (0.005) (0.006) (0.016) (0.016)*** (0.016)** % of Self Employment 0.194 0.316 0.517 -0.201 -0.189 (0.003) (0.005) (0.019) (0.019)*** (0.020)*** % of Private Transfer 0.324 0.154 0.024 0.130 0.130 (0.006) (0.003) (0.008) (0.009)*** (0.009)*** % of Govern Transfer d 0.004 0.009 0.000 0.009 0.009 (0.007) 0.000 0.000 (0.001)*** (0.001)*** a Table computed at household and individual level in El Salvador using Encuesta de Hogares de Propositos Multiples 2008 and UTPMP Impact Evaluation Data 2007 – 08 Sources. Standard errors clustered at Primary Sample Unit level shown in parentheses. The EHPM 2008 Data contain clusters (PSU:“segmento”) and UTPMP 33 clusters (PSU:“caserio”). b National Poor means households who live with less than USD 89.4 per capita per month in urban zones and less than USD 58.2 in rural zones in 2008, equivalent to two CBAs which represents the National Poverty Line and basic needs in El Salvador in 2008. c Urban and Rural zones in El Salvador face different prices, then the regression have a dummy by cluster (settlement - UTPMP slum dwellers; comuna - EHPM poors) and a dummy by zone. Reported Results: estimated coefficient, clustered standard error at block level in brackets (23 clusters for UTPMP Slums and 500 clusters for EHPM Poors). d Total Income includes Retirement Pension Transfers, but they are not included in Public Transfers income.
*Significantly at 10% level. **Significantly at 5% level. ***Significantly at 1% level
Table 4: Differences of Means between groups El Salvador a
Variable
(1) Mean of Observations
Non Poor (EHPM 2008)
(2) Mean of Observations National Poor
(EHPM 2008) b
(3) Mean of Observations Settlements
(UTPMP 2007-08)
Dif (2)-(3) Dif (2)-(3)c
Employment Indicators (IND) Employment rate 16-64 0.656 0.545 0.526 0.019 0.009 (0.003) (0.004) (0.014) (0.014) (0.014) Employment rate Males 16-64 0.370 0.349 0.374 -0.025 -0.011 (0.003) (0.003) (0.010) (0.011)** (0.013) Employment rate Females 16-64 0.286 0.196 0.152 0.044 0.020 (0.003) (0.003) (0.013) (0.013)*** (0.014) Wage employment rate 16-64 0.459 0.346 0.216 0.130 0.119 (0.003) (0.004) (0.014) (0.015)*** (0.014)*** Wage employment rate Males 16-64 0.278 0.243 0.187 0.056 0.058 (0.003) (0.003) (0.012) (0.012)*** (0.013)*** Wage employment rate Females 16-64 0.181 0.103 0.029 0.074 0.061 (0.002) (0.002) (0.006) (0.006)*** (0.007)*** Self employment rate 16-64 0.197 0.199 0.308 -0.110 -0.109 (0.002) (0.003) (0.014) (0.014)*** (0.014)*** Self employment rate Males 16-64 0.092 0.106 0.185 -0.079 -0.068 (0.001) (0.003) (0.015) (0.016)*** (0.016)*** Self employment rate Females 16-64 0.105 0.093 0.123 -0.030 -0.041 (0.002) (0.002) (0.008) (0.009)*** (0.009)*** Average Wage Males 16-64 (Main Job) (USD) 310.962 142.058 145.829 -3.771 -13.048 (6.307) (1.627) (5.853) (6.352) (7.729)* Average Wage Females 16-64 (Main Job) (USD) 258.734 113.807 135.256 -21.449 -31.193 (5.346) (1.583) (4.628) (4.842)*** (5.392)*** a Table computed at household and individual level in El Salvador using Encuesta de Hogares de Propositos Multiples 2008 and UTPMP Impact Evaluation Data 2007 – 08 Sources. Standard errors clustered at Primary Sample Unit level shown in parentheses. The EHPM 2008 Data contain clusters (PSU:“segmento”) and UTPMP 33 clusters (PSU:“caserio”). b National Poor means households who live with less than USD 89.4 per capita per month in urban zones and less than USD 58.2 in rural zones in 2008, equivalent to two CBAs which represents the National Poverty Line and basic needs in El Salvador in 2008. c Urban and Rural zones in El Salvador face different prices, then the regression have a dummy by cluster (settlement - UTPMP slum dwellers; comuna - EHPM poors) and a dummy by zone. Reported Results: estimated coefficient, clustered standard error at block level in brackets (23 clusters for UTPMP Slums and 500 clusters for EHPM Poors). d Total Income includes Retirement Pension Transfers, but they are not included in Public Transfers income. *Significantly at 10% level. **Significantly at 5% level. ***Significantly at 1% level
Table 4: Differences of Means between groups El Salvador a
Variable
(1) Mean of Observations
Non Poor (EHPM 2008)
(2) Mean of Observations National Poor
(EHPM 2008) b
(3) Mean of Observations Settlements
(UTPMP 2007-08)
Dif (2)-(3) Dif (2)-(3)c
Demographics HH Size 3.779 4.660 4.860 -0.200 -0.085 (0.021) (0.032) (0.124) (0.125) (0.116) Female Head (%) 0.353 0.298 0.219 0.079 0.052 (0.004) (0.006) (0.015) (0.017) *** (0.020)** Head of HH's Age 48.229 46.376 43.438 2.938 2.811 (0.204) (0.221) (1.048) (1.059) *** (1.151)** Head of HH's years of schooling 6.372 4.013 4.392 -0.378 -0.692 (0.096) (0.058) (0.176) (0.193) * (0.164)*** % children 5-12 enrolled in school 0.922 0.834 0.929 -0.094 -0.103 (0.003) (0.005) (0.010) (0.011) *** (0.012)*** % children 13-18 enrolled in school 0.724 0.652 0.540 0.112 0.076 (0.007) (0.009) (0.028) (0.030) *** (0.029)*** a Table computed at household and individual level in El Salvador using Encuesta de Hogares de Propositos Multiples 2008 and UTPMP Impact Evaluation Data 2007 – 08 Sources. Standard errors clustered at Primary Sample Unit level shown in parentheses. The EHPM 2008 Data contain clusters (PSU:“segmento”) and UTPMP 33 clusters (PSU:“caserio”). b National Poor means households who live with less than USD 89.4 per capita per month in urban zones and less than USD 58.2 in rural zones in 2008, equivalent to two CBAs which represents the National Poverty Line and basic needs in El Salvador in 2008. c Urban and Rural zones in El Salvador face different prices, then the regression have a dummy by cluster (settlement - UTPMP slum dwellers; comuna - EHPM poors) and a dummy by zone. Reported Results: estimated coefficient, clustered standard error at block level in brackets (23 clusters for UTPMP Slums and 500 clusters for EHPM Poors). d Total Income includes Retirement Pension Transfers, but they are not included in Public Transfers income. *Significantly at 10% level. **Significantly at 5% level. ***Significantly at 1% level
Table 4: Differences of Means between groups El Salvador a
Variable
(1) Mean of Observations
Non Poor (EHPM 2008)
(2) Mean of Observations National Poor
(EHPM 2008) b
(3) Mean of Observations Settlements
(UTPMP 2007-08)
Dif (2)-(3) Dif (2)-(3)c
Housing and Assets Rooms Per Capita 0.909 0.512 0.394 0.118 0.085 (0.009) (0.006) (0.017) (0.018) *** (0.024)*** % Dirty Floors 0.163 0.390 0.931 -0.541 -0.482 (0.005) (0.010) (0.017) (0.021) *** (0.032)*** % Weak Walls 0.249 0.436 0.919 -0.483 -0.424 (0.007) (0.009) (0.037) (0.037) *** (0.050)*** % Weak Roofs 0.297 0.452 0.917 -0.465 -0.466 (0.007) (0.010) (0.021) (0.024) *** (0.024)*** % Water Connection 0.700 0.544 0.249 0.295 0.227 (0.009) (0.010) (0.053) (0.054) *** (0.062)*** % Access to toilet 0.967 0.922 0.680 0.241 0.207 (0.002) (0.005) (0.052) (0.051) *** (0.043)*** % Access to private toilet 0.844 0.765 0.550 0.215 0.199 (0.005) (0.007) (0.057) (0.057) *** (0.057)*** % Connected to sewage 0.686 0.640 0.007 0.633 0.491 (0.015) (0.019) (0.003) (0.019) *** (0.059)*** % Electricity 0.928 0.810 0.416 0.394 0.346 (0.003) (0.009) (0.069) (0.071) *** (0.081)*** % Cook with wood 0.183 0.486 0.800 -0.314 -0.212 (0.006) (0.012) (0.046) (0.050) *** (0.065)*** % Refrigerators 0.658 0.328 0.094 0.234 0.181 (0.007) (0.008) (0.028) (0.031) *** (0.041)*** % TV 0.864 0.678 0.393 0.286 0.204 (0.004) (0.009) (0.048) (0.050) *** (0.066)*** a Table computed at household and individual level in El Salvador using Encuesta de Hogares de Propositos Multiples 2008 and UTPMP Impact Evaluation Data 2007 – 08 Sources. Standard errors clustered at Primary Sample Unit level shown in parentheses. The EHPM 2008 Data contain clusters (PSU:“segmento”) and UTPMP 33 clusters (PSU:“caserio”). b National Poor means households who live with less than USD 89.4 per capita per month in urban zones and less than USD 58.2 in rural zones in 2008, equivalent to two CBAs which represents the National Poverty Line and basic needs in El Salvador in 2008. c Urban and Rural zones in El Salvador face different prices, then the regression have a dummy by cluster (settlement - UTPMP slum dwellers; comuna - EHPM poors) and a dummy by zone. Reported Results: estimated coefficient, clustered standard error at block level in brackets (23 clusters for UTPMP Slums and 500 clusters for EHPM Poors). d Total Income includes Retirement Pension Transfers, but they are not included in Public Transfers income. *Significantly at 10% level. **Significantly at 5% level. ***Significantly at 1% level
Table 4: Differences of Means between groups Uruguay (Montevideo and Canelones Departments)a
Variable
(1) Mean of Observations
Non Poor out of Slums (ECH
2008)
(2) Mean of Obervations Poor Out of
Slums (ECH 2008) b
(3) Mean of Observations Settlements (ECH 2008)
Dif (2)-(3)
Income Indicators (HH) Total Income PC 778.646 174.081 273.628 -99.547 (58.485) (0.849) (7.513) (7.243)*** % of Wage Work 0.331 0.258 0.319 -0.061 (0.002) (0.007) (0.007) (0.009)*** % of Self Employment 0.309 0.218 0.222 -0.004 (0.008) (0.010) (0.005) (0.009) % of Private Transfer 0.043 0.052 0.044 0.008 (0.002) (0.001) (0.002) (0.003)*** % of Govern Transfer c 0.177 0.436 0.366 0.070 (0.007) (0.002) (0.006) (0.006)*** a Table computed at household and individual level in Montevideo and Canelones Departments in Uruguay using Encuesta Continua de Hogares (ECH). Standard errors clustered at Primary Sample Unit level shown in parentheses. The ECH Data contain 232 clusters (PSU:“segmento”) and households who live in settlements are contained in 147 clusters (PSU:“segmento”) b National Poor means households who live below the National Poverty Line in urban zones in Uruguay. This line is calculated monthly and in 2008 varied between 213 and 234 dollars per month depending on which month was the household measured. The poverty line represents a CBA of "food needs" plus a CBA of "non-food needs", both calculated in base of needs of 2006 in Uruguay
c Total Income includes Retirement Pension Transfers, but they are not included in Public Transfers income. *Significantly at 10% level. **Significantly at 5% level. ***Significantly at 1% level
Table 4: Differences of Means between groups Uruguay (Montevideo and Canelones Departments)a
Variable
(1) Mean of Observations Non Poor out
of Slums (ECH 2008)
(2) Mean of Obervations Poor Out of
Slums (ECH 2008) b
(3) Mean of Observations Settlements (ECH 2008)
Dif (2)-(3)
Employment Indicators (IND) Employment rate 16-64 0.741 0.584 0.647 -0.063 (0.002) (0.004) (0.007) (0.007)*** Employment rate Males 16-64 0.387 0.337 0.388 -0.051 (0.006) (0.009) (0.006) (0.010)*** Employment rate Females 16-64 0.354 0.247 0.260 -0.012 (0.008) (0.011) (0.006) (0.011) Wage employment rate 16-64 0.561 0.404 0.467 -0.063 (0.011) (0.005) (0.008) (0.009)*** Wage employment rate Males 16-64 0.278 0.225 0.271 -0.046 (0.002) (0.008) (0.007) (0.009)*** Wage employment rate Females 16-64
0.283 0.178
0.196 -0.017
(0.011) (0.010) (0.006) (0.012) Self employment rate 16-64 0.180 0.181 0.180 0.000 (0.010) (0.003) (0.007) (0.008) Self employment rate Males 16-64 0.109 0.112 0.116 -0.005 (0.007) (0.003) (0.004) (0.005) Self employment rate Females 16-64
0.071 0.069
0.064 0.005
(0.003) (0.002) (0.004) (0.005) Average Wage Males 16-64 (Main Job) (USD)
778.071 230.312
304.915 -74.603
(44.575) (3.286) (8.804) (9.701)*** Average Wage Females 16-64 (Main Job) (USD)
496.821 126.154
176.903 -50.749
(25.662) (3.558) (6.229) (5.893)*** a Table computed at household and individual level in Montevideo and Canelones Departments in Uruguay using Encuesta Continua de Hogares (ECH). Standard errors clustered at Primary Sample Unit level shown in parentheses. The ECH Data contain 232 clusters (PSU:“segmento”) and households who live in settlements are contained in 147 clusters (PSU:“segmento”) b National Poor means households who live below the National Poverty Line in urban zones in Uruguay. This line is calculated monthly and in 2008 varied between 213 and 234 dollars per month depending on which month was the household measured. The poverty line represents a CBA of "food needs" plus a CBA of "non-food needs", both calculated in base of needs of 2006 in Uruguay c Total Income includes Retirement Pension Transfers, but they are not included in Public Transfers income. *Significantly at 10% level. **Significantly at 5% level. ***Significantly at 1% level
Table 4: Differences of Means between groups Uruguay (Montevideo and Canelones Departments)a
Variable
(1) Mean of Observations Non Poor out
of Slums (ECH 2008)
(2) Mean of Obervations Poor Out of
Slums (ECH 2008) b
(3) Mean of Observations Settlements (ECH 2008)
Dif (2)-(3)
Demographics HH Size 2.549 4.274 3.691 0.584 (0.028) (0.091) (0.053) (0.118)*** Female Head (%) 0.398 0.378 0.372 0.005 (0.023) (0.038) (0.013) (0.039) Head of HH's Age 55.496 45.311 45.423 -0.112 (0.151) (0.213) (0.352) (0.395) Head of HH's years of schooling 9.476 6.351 6.169 0.182 (0.550) (0.190) (0.099) (0.140) % children 5-12 enrolled in school 0.988 0.980 0.978 0.002 (0.001) (0.002) (0.003) (0.004) % children 13-18 enrolled in school 0.875 0.707 0.661 0.046 (0.011) (0.011) (0.019) (0.024)* a Table computed at household and individual level in Montevideo and Canelones Departments in Uruguay using Encuesta Continua de Hogares (ECH). Standard errors clustered at Primary Sample Unit level shown in parentheses. The ECH Data contain 232 clusters (PSU:“segmento”) and households who live in settlements are contained in 147 clusters (PSU:“segmento”) b National Poor means households who live below the National Poverty Line in urban zones in Uruguay. This line is calculated monthly and in 2008 varied between 213 and 234 dollars per month depending on which month was the household measured. The poverty line represents a CBA of "food needs" plus a CBA of "non-food needs", both calculated in base of needs of 2006 in Uruguay c Total Income includes Retirement Pension Transfers, but they are not included in Public Transfers income. *Significantly at 10% level. **Significantly at 5% level. ***Significantly at 1% level
Table 4: Differences of Means between groups Uruguay (Montevideo and Canelones Departments)a
Variable
(1) Mean of Observations Non Poor out
of Slums (ECH 2008)
(2) Mean of Obervations Poor Out of
Slums (ECH 2008) b
(3) Mean of Observations Settlements (ECH 2008)
Dif (2)-(3)
Housing and Assets Rooms Per Capita 1.737 0.836 0.977 -0.141 (0.017) (0.024) (0.020) (0.039)*** % Dirty Floors 0.036 0.242 0.404 -0.162 (0.011) (0.010) (0.017) (0.016)*** % Weak Walls 0.004 0.025 0.087 -0.063 (0.000) (0.002) (0.009) (0.008)*** % Weak Roofs 0.031 0.235 0.448 -0.212 (0.008) (0.008) (0.019) (0.021)*** % Water Connection 0.948 0.864 0.989 -0.125 (0.036) (0.061) (0.004) (0.057)** % Access to toilet 0.996 0.964 0.937 0.027 (0.001) (0.005) (0.007) (0.009)*** % Access to private toilet 0.976 0.922 0.895 0.027 (0.001) (0.006) (0.009) (0.012)*** % Connected to sewage 0.703 0.543 0.604 -0.061 (0.010) (0.033) (0.023) (0.025)** % Electricity 0.998 0.988 0.996 -0.008 (0.000) (0.003) (0.001) (0.003)** % Cook with wood 0.013 0.054 0.016 0.038 (0.008) (0.023) (0.004) (0.020)* % Refrigerators 0.985 0.886 0.860 0.027 (0.002) (0.006) (0.011) (0.011)** % TV 0.984 0.939 0.919 0.020 (0.002) (0.007) (0.008) (0.009)** a Table computed at household and individual level in Montevideo and Canelones Departments in Uruguay using Encuesta Continua de Hogares (ECH). Standard errors clustered at Primary Sample Unit level shown in parentheses. The ECH Data contain 232 clusters (PSU:“segmento”) and households who live in settlements are contained in 147 clusters (PSU:“segmento”) b National Poor means households who live below the National Poverty Line in urban zones in Uruguay. This line is calculated monthly and in 2008 varied between 213 and 234 dollars per month depending on which month was the household measured. The poverty line represents a CBA of "food needs" plus a CBA of "non-food needs", both calculated in base of needs of 2006 in Uruguay c Total Income includes Retirement Pension Transfers, but they are not included in Public Transfers income. *Significantly at 10% level. **Significantly at 5% level. ***Significantly at 1% level
Table 5. Differences of Means between Countries. Treatment and Internal Control Groups. Baseline Survey. a
Variables
Total Observation
s
Mean El Salvador
Mean Uruguay
Mean Differences
Characteristics of the House Number of Rooms per HH 1,477 2.431 2.666 -0.235 (0.086) (0.060) (0.104) ** (0.043) (0.047) (0.065) *** Share of Rooms with Dirty Floors 1,441 0.854 0.364 0.490 (0.015) (0.028) (0.032) *** (0.009) (0.016) (0.018) *** Share of Rooms with Low Quality Walls 1,255 0.896 0.683 0.213 (0.036) (0.044) (0.056)*** (0.008) (0.018) (0.019)*** Sahre of Rooms with Low Quality Roofs 1,438 0.999 0.993 0.006 (0.000) (0.002) (0.002)*** (0.000) (0.002) (0.002)*** Share of Rooms with Window 1,470 0.163 0.567 -0.405 (0.017) (0.015) (0.022) *** (0.010) (0.014) (0.017) *** Water Connection (=1) 1,475 0.215 0.915 -0.700 (0.051) (0.013) (0.053) *** (0.015) (0.010) (0.018) *** Sink on Room where food is prepared (=1) 1,462 0.012 0.254 -0.242 (0.005) (0.025) (0.024) *** (0.004) (0.015) (0.016) *** Room where food is prepared is also used as Bedroom (=1) 1,459 0.313 0.432 -0.119
(0.047) (0.025) (0.053) ** (0.017) (0.017) (0.025) *** Electricity Connection inside the House (=1) 1,477 0.391 0.959 -0.568 (0.058) (0.006) (0.058) *** (0.018) (0.007) (0.019) *** Use Gas Stove or Kerosene to Cook (=1) 1,477 0.173 0.453 -0.280 (0.034) (0.052) (0.061) *** (0.014) (0.017) (0.023) *** House with Own Bathroom (=1) 1,477 0.483 0.634 -0.151 (0.041) (0.024) (0.047) *** (0.018) (0.017) (0.025) *** a On material of rooms, were only included those households that reported information for all rooms. On monetary variables, observations over p99 were not considered. Reported Results: Standard errors clustered at survey-block level shown in parentheses (23 clusters for El Salvador and 12 clusters for Uruguay) and standard error are reported. Data source: 2007 - 2008 UTPMP Baseline data *Significantly at 10% level. **Significantly at 5% level. ***Significantly at 1% level
Next Steps • Using the results of the evalua'on, and the interest of the NGO in improving the health of the children, we are now:
• Adding to these houses cuing edge water cleaning technology developed by the founders of Cántaro Azul (CA), a Mexican NGO, at the UC Berkeley.
• This system, the Mesita Azul (MA), advocates to being capable of providing clean drinking water to slum dwellers at a cost of US$50 per device.