Upload
art-rodriguez
View
37
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Gas Well Deliquification Workshop
Sheraton Hotel, Denver, Colorado
February 17 20, 2013
Ball and Sleeve Plunger System Automation Algorithm Utilizing Ball Fall Rates
Ben Smiley & Jordan Portillo Anadarko
Outline
Purpose
Pacemaker Benefits/Challenges
Potential Solution
Afterflow Calculation/Process
Trial Well
Production Performance
Conclusions
Feb. 27 - Mar. 2, 2011 2011 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop
Denver, Colorado
2
Purpose
Problem
Expanding field with new operators inexperienced at plunger lift operations
Objective
Create a plunger program capable of running a pacemaker plunger with limited inputs
Feb. 27 - Mar. 2, 2011 2011 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop
Denver, Colorado
3
Recap of Pacemaker Benefits
More cycles per day
Ball falls against flow
At SI, sleeve falls at ~5000
fpm (57 MPH)
Less fluid load per trip
Requires less casing pressure to lift
Lower Flowing Bottom Hole Pressure
Continually lift fluids off formation
Creates less line spikes
Near-continuous gas flow
Feb. 17 20, 2013 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado
4
Pacemaker Challenges
Require significant operator time to optimize upon
installation
Hard to troubleshoot require knowledge and
experience
Well conditions are dynamic with fluctuating
line pressure and low FBHP
Feb. 17 20, 2013 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado
5
Potential Solution
Dynamic After-flow Program
Inputs
Surface Flowrate
Tubing Pressure
Gas Composition Assumptions
Output
Ball Fall Rate
Calculation
Ball location 0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0 1000 2000
Flo
wra
te (
MC
FD
)
Ball Fall Velocity (FPM)
IPS Fall Chart by Tubing Pressure (SPE 93997 [1])
10
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
Feb. 17 20, 2013 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado
6
After-flow Calculation
7
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Velo
cit
y
(FP
M)
Pressure (psia)
Ball Fall Velocity vs. Pressure (SPE 93997 [1])
Ball FPM zero gas V Gas FPM @ input rate Ball FPM @ input rate
Ball Type Weight
(lbs) Test Flowrate (MCFD)
Well Surface Pressure
(psia)
Tested Ball Fall Rate
(FPM)
Silica Nitrate Ball 0.164 200 25 1000
Titanium Ball 0.23 395 100 1000
Zircon Ceramic Ball 0.29 495 125 1000
Steel Ball 0.387 605 125 1000
Cobalt Ball 0.437 700 150 1000
Feb. 17 20, 2013 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado
After-flow Calculation Process
Feb. 17 20, 2013 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado
8
Ball
Type
Shut-In
Depth
Gas
Gravity
Average Well
Temperature Tubing ID
Static
Input
Z Factor
Calculation
Tubing
Velocity
Gas
Density
Drag
Coefficient
Ball Fall
Velocity with
Flow
Ball Fall
Velocity with
No Flow
Dynamic
Input
Surface
Pressure
Surface
Flowrate
End Result
Cumulative Ball Depth
Pacemaker Cycle Example
9 Feb. 17 20, 2013 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado
[1]
Possible
Liquid Load
Gas
Calculation
Interval
Sleeve slides over
rod ball falls & calculations begin
Ball & sleeve
rise together
Ball & sleeve
rise together
Ball calculated to be
halfway to bottom 10 sec shut in to release sleeve
Ball & sleeve reach
bottom close to
same time
Candidate Wellbore
Uintah Basin
Greater Natural Buttes
Fluvial Tight Gas
Mesaverde & Wasatch
3,000+ Perforation Interval
Typical LGR = 70 BBL/MMCF
10 Feb. 17 20, 2013 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado
Production Timeline
Operator
Initial
Pacemaker
Install
Pacemaker
Program
installed
Plant
Upsets
Program
Issues
Production/Pressure Timeline
PLC Program
Installed
12
Initial Problems (Shaded Area)
Program
sticking in Pause
Open
Dropped
Offtime Paused
Open
Retrieval
tool Slickline
13
Production Results
PLC
Program
Installed
14
Plunger Trend
81 Plunger Trips per day
15
Plunger Cycle Example
1 1
1 2 2
3 3
1 = Start Ontime 2 = Plunger Arrival 3 = Begin Offtime 16
Plunger Lift Optimization Tool (PLOT)
Plunger Lift Correlation Equations and Nomographs Carrol Beeson
Calculates the minimum required casing pressure to
effectively run a plunger
Well is hovering minimum required casing pressure
Feb. 17 20, 2013 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado
17
[2]
Conclusions
Program successfully ran and optimized a pacemaker setup by pressing START
Lowered casing pressure to the minimum required casing pressure to run a conventional plunger (Beeson Correlation)
High cycle count will reduce scale buildup but increase equipment wear
Need more experimental data
Realistically suitable for all pacemaker candidate wells?
Can this program effectively run without consistent line pressure?
Test Step-up/Step-down shut-in depth
Possibly help with quick line pressure fluctuations
Program installed in future Test Pad
Feb. 17 20, 2013 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado
18
Questions?
Acknowledgments
Dan Volz
Trenton Hegerhorst
Mark Peck
Deven Oaks
Callo Lee
Braden Robinson
IPS
Feb. 17 20, 2013 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado
19
References
1. Garg,D., Lea, J.F., Cox, J., and Oetama, T. New Considerations for Modeling Plunger Performance, SPE 93997, Presented at the Oklahoma City Production Operations Symposium, 2005.
2. Beeson, C.M., Knox, D.G., and Stoddard, J.H. Plunger Lift Correlation Equations and Nomographs, Petroleum Engineer, 1957.
3. Lea, J.F., Nickens, H.V., and Wells, M.R. Gas Well Deliquification. 2.
Gulf Professional Publishing, 2008.
20 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop
Denver, Colorado
Feb. 17 20, 2013
Feb. 17 20, 2013 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado
21
Copyright
Rights to this presentation are owned by the company(ies) and/or author(s) listed on the title page. By submitting this presentation to the Gas Well Deliquification Workshop, they grant to the Workshop, the Artificial Lift Research and Development Council (ALRDC), and the Southwestern Petroleum Short Course (SWPSC), rights to:
Display the presentation at the Workshop.
Place it on the www.alrdc.com web site, with access to the site to be as directed by the Workshop Steering Committee.
Place it on a CD for distribution and/or sale as directed by the Workshop Steering Committee.
Other use of this presentation is prohibited without the expressed written permission of the author(s). The owner company(ies) and/or author(s) may publish this material in other journals or magazines if they refer to the Gas Well Deliquification Workshop where it was first presented.
Feb. 17 20, 2013 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado
22
Disclaimer
The following disclaimer shall be included as the last page of a Technical Presentation or Continuing Education Course. A similar disclaimer is included on the front page of the Gas Well Deliquification Web Site.
The Artificial Lift Research and Development Council and its officers and trustees, and the Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Steering Committee members, and their supporting organizations and companies (here-in-after referred to as the Sponsoring Organizations), and the author(s) of this Technical Presentation or Continuing Education Training Course and their company(ies), provide this presentation and/or training material at the Gas Well Deliquification Workshop "as is" without any warranty of any kind, express or implied, as to the accuracy of the information or the products or services referred to by any presenter (in so far as such warranties may be excluded under any relevant law) and these members and their companies will not be liable for unlawful actions and any losses or damage that may result from use of any presentation as a consequence of any inaccuracies in, or any omission from, the information which therein may be contained.
The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in these presentations and/or training materials are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Sponsoring Organizations. The author is solely responsible for the content of the materials.
The Sponsoring Organizations cannot and do not warrant the accuracy of these documents beyond the source documents, although we do make every attempt to work from authoritative sources. The Sponsoring Organizations provide these presentations and/or training materials as a service. The Sponsoring Organizations make no representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the presentations and/or training materials, or any part thereof, including any warrantees of title, non-infringement of copyright or patent rights of others, merchantability, or fitness or suitability for any purpose.