22
Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Sheraton Hotel, Denver, Colorado February 17 20, 2013 Ball and Sleeve Plunger System Automation Algorithm Utilizing Ball Fall Rates Ben Smiley & Jordan Portillo Anadarko

4 - 1 - Presentation --- Anadarko --- Pacemaker Automation Testing

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Gas Well Deliquification Workshop

    Sheraton Hotel, Denver, Colorado

    February 17 20, 2013

    Ball and Sleeve Plunger System Automation Algorithm Utilizing Ball Fall Rates

    Ben Smiley & Jordan Portillo Anadarko

  • Outline

    Purpose

    Pacemaker Benefits/Challenges

    Potential Solution

    Afterflow Calculation/Process

    Trial Well

    Production Performance

    Conclusions

    Feb. 27 - Mar. 2, 2011 2011 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop

    Denver, Colorado

    2

  • Purpose

    Problem

    Expanding field with new operators inexperienced at plunger lift operations

    Objective

    Create a plunger program capable of running a pacemaker plunger with limited inputs

    Feb. 27 - Mar. 2, 2011 2011 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop

    Denver, Colorado

    3

  • Recap of Pacemaker Benefits

    More cycles per day

    Ball falls against flow

    At SI, sleeve falls at ~5000

    fpm (57 MPH)

    Less fluid load per trip

    Requires less casing pressure to lift

    Lower Flowing Bottom Hole Pressure

    Continually lift fluids off formation

    Creates less line spikes

    Near-continuous gas flow

    Feb. 17 20, 2013 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado

    4

  • Pacemaker Challenges

    Require significant operator time to optimize upon

    installation

    Hard to troubleshoot require knowledge and

    experience

    Well conditions are dynamic with fluctuating

    line pressure and low FBHP

    Feb. 17 20, 2013 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado

    5

  • Potential Solution

    Dynamic After-flow Program

    Inputs

    Surface Flowrate

    Tubing Pressure

    Gas Composition Assumptions

    Output

    Ball Fall Rate

    Calculation

    Ball location 0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    0 1000 2000

    Flo

    wra

    te (

    MC

    FD

    )

    Ball Fall Velocity (FPM)

    IPS Fall Chart by Tubing Pressure (SPE 93997 [1])

    10

    25

    50

    75

    100

    125

    150

    175

    200

    Feb. 17 20, 2013 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado

    6

  • After-flow Calculation

    7

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    3000

    3500

    4000

    4500

    0 200 400 600 800 1000

    Velo

    cit

    y

    (FP

    M)

    Pressure (psia)

    Ball Fall Velocity vs. Pressure (SPE 93997 [1])

    Ball FPM zero gas V Gas FPM @ input rate Ball FPM @ input rate

    Ball Type Weight

    (lbs) Test Flowrate (MCFD)

    Well Surface Pressure

    (psia)

    Tested Ball Fall Rate

    (FPM)

    Silica Nitrate Ball 0.164 200 25 1000

    Titanium Ball 0.23 395 100 1000

    Zircon Ceramic Ball 0.29 495 125 1000

    Steel Ball 0.387 605 125 1000

    Cobalt Ball 0.437 700 150 1000

    Feb. 17 20, 2013 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado

  • After-flow Calculation Process

    Feb. 17 20, 2013 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado

    8

    Ball

    Type

    Shut-In

    Depth

    Gas

    Gravity

    Average Well

    Temperature Tubing ID

    Static

    Input

    Z Factor

    Calculation

    Tubing

    Velocity

    Gas

    Density

    Drag

    Coefficient

    Ball Fall

    Velocity with

    Flow

    Ball Fall

    Velocity with

    No Flow

    Dynamic

    Input

    Surface

    Pressure

    Surface

    Flowrate

    End Result

    Cumulative Ball Depth

  • Pacemaker Cycle Example

    9 Feb. 17 20, 2013 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado

    [1]

    Possible

    Liquid Load

    Gas

    Calculation

    Interval

    Sleeve slides over

    rod ball falls & calculations begin

    Ball & sleeve

    rise together

    Ball & sleeve

    rise together

    Ball calculated to be

    halfway to bottom 10 sec shut in to release sleeve

    Ball & sleeve reach

    bottom close to

    same time

  • Candidate Wellbore

    Uintah Basin

    Greater Natural Buttes

    Fluvial Tight Gas

    Mesaverde & Wasatch

    3,000+ Perforation Interval

    Typical LGR = 70 BBL/MMCF

    10 Feb. 17 20, 2013 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado

  • Production Timeline

    Operator

    Initial

    Pacemaker

    Install

    Pacemaker

    Program

    installed

    Plant

    Upsets

    Program

    Issues

  • Production/Pressure Timeline

    PLC Program

    Installed

    12

  • Initial Problems (Shaded Area)

    Program

    sticking in Pause

    Open

    Dropped

    Offtime Paused

    Open

    Retrieval

    tool Slickline

    13

  • Production Results

    PLC

    Program

    Installed

    14

  • Plunger Trend

    81 Plunger Trips per day

    15

  • Plunger Cycle Example

    1 1

    1 2 2

    3 3

    1 = Start Ontime 2 = Plunger Arrival 3 = Begin Offtime 16

  • Plunger Lift Optimization Tool (PLOT)

    Plunger Lift Correlation Equations and Nomographs Carrol Beeson

    Calculates the minimum required casing pressure to

    effectively run a plunger

    Well is hovering minimum required casing pressure

    Feb. 17 20, 2013 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado

    17

    [2]

  • Conclusions

    Program successfully ran and optimized a pacemaker setup by pressing START

    Lowered casing pressure to the minimum required casing pressure to run a conventional plunger (Beeson Correlation)

    High cycle count will reduce scale buildup but increase equipment wear

    Need more experimental data

    Realistically suitable for all pacemaker candidate wells?

    Can this program effectively run without consistent line pressure?

    Test Step-up/Step-down shut-in depth

    Possibly help with quick line pressure fluctuations

    Program installed in future Test Pad

    Feb. 17 20, 2013 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado

    18

  • Questions?

    Acknowledgments

    Dan Volz

    Trenton Hegerhorst

    Mark Peck

    Deven Oaks

    Callo Lee

    Braden Robinson

    IPS

    Feb. 17 20, 2013 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado

    19

  • References

    1. Garg,D., Lea, J.F., Cox, J., and Oetama, T. New Considerations for Modeling Plunger Performance, SPE 93997, Presented at the Oklahoma City Production Operations Symposium, 2005.

    2. Beeson, C.M., Knox, D.G., and Stoddard, J.H. Plunger Lift Correlation Equations and Nomographs, Petroleum Engineer, 1957.

    3. Lea, J.F., Nickens, H.V., and Wells, M.R. Gas Well Deliquification. 2.

    Gulf Professional Publishing, 2008.

    20 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop

    Denver, Colorado

    Feb. 17 20, 2013

  • Feb. 17 20, 2013 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado

    21

    Copyright

    Rights to this presentation are owned by the company(ies) and/or author(s) listed on the title page. By submitting this presentation to the Gas Well Deliquification Workshop, they grant to the Workshop, the Artificial Lift Research and Development Council (ALRDC), and the Southwestern Petroleum Short Course (SWPSC), rights to:

    Display the presentation at the Workshop.

    Place it on the www.alrdc.com web site, with access to the site to be as directed by the Workshop Steering Committee.

    Place it on a CD for distribution and/or sale as directed by the Workshop Steering Committee.

    Other use of this presentation is prohibited without the expressed written permission of the author(s). The owner company(ies) and/or author(s) may publish this material in other journals or magazines if they refer to the Gas Well Deliquification Workshop where it was first presented.

  • Feb. 17 20, 2013 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado

    22

    Disclaimer

    The following disclaimer shall be included as the last page of a Technical Presentation or Continuing Education Course. A similar disclaimer is included on the front page of the Gas Well Deliquification Web Site.

    The Artificial Lift Research and Development Council and its officers and trustees, and the Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Steering Committee members, and their supporting organizations and companies (here-in-after referred to as the Sponsoring Organizations), and the author(s) of this Technical Presentation or Continuing Education Training Course and their company(ies), provide this presentation and/or training material at the Gas Well Deliquification Workshop "as is" without any warranty of any kind, express or implied, as to the accuracy of the information or the products or services referred to by any presenter (in so far as such warranties may be excluded under any relevant law) and these members and their companies will not be liable for unlawful actions and any losses or damage that may result from use of any presentation as a consequence of any inaccuracies in, or any omission from, the information which therein may be contained.

    The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in these presentations and/or training materials are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Sponsoring Organizations. The author is solely responsible for the content of the materials.

    The Sponsoring Organizations cannot and do not warrant the accuracy of these documents beyond the source documents, although we do make every attempt to work from authoritative sources. The Sponsoring Organizations provide these presentations and/or training materials as a service. The Sponsoring Organizations make no representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the presentations and/or training materials, or any part thereof, including any warrantees of title, non-infringement of copyright or patent rights of others, merchantability, or fitness or suitability for any purpose.