23
1 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1History:- The first attempt to create solid objects using photopolymers using a laser took place in the late 1960s at Battelle Memorial Institute. The experiment involved intersecting two laser beams of differing wave length in the middle of a vat of resin, attempting to polymerize (solidify) the material at the point of intersection. In the early 1970s, Formigraphic Engine Co. used the dual- laser approach in the first commercial laser-prototyping project, a process it called photochemical machining. In the late 1970s, Dynell Electronics Corp. was assigned a series of patents on solid photography. DEVELOPMENT OF SEREOLITHOGRAPHY- Hideo Kodama of the Nagoya Municipal Industrial Research Institute (Nagoya, Japan) was among the first to invent the single-beam laser curing approach, according to several sources. In October 1980, Kodama published a paper titled Three-Dimensional Data Display by Automatic Preparation of a Three-Dimensional Model that outlined his work in detail. His experiments consisted of projecting UV rays using a Toshiba mercury lamp and a photosensitive resin called Tevistar. In August 1982, Alan Herbert of 3M Graphic Technologies Sector Laboratory published a paper titled Solid Object Generation in the Journal of Applied Photographic Engineering. In this paper, Herbert described a system that directs an Argon Ion laser beam onto the surface of photopolymer by means of a mirror system attached to an x-y pen plotter device. With the system, Herbert was able to create several small, basic shapes. In August 1984, Charles Hull, co-founder and chief technical officer of 3D Systems (at that time, in Valencia, California), applied for a U.S. patent titled Apparatus for Production of Three-Dimensional Objects by Stereolithography, which was granted in March 1986. Osaka Prefectural Industrial Research Institute In 1984, Yoji Marutani of the Osaka Prefectural Industrial Research Institute (OPIRI), also referred to as the Osaka Institute of Industrial Technology,

3d manufacturing

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

3d manufacturing

Citation preview

  • 1

    Chapter 1 Introduction

    1.1History:- The first attempt to create solid objects using photopolymers using a laser took place in the late 1960s at Battelle Memorial Institute. The experiment involved intersecting two laser beams of differing wave length in the middle of a vat of resin, attempting to polymerize (solidify) the material at the point of intersection. In the early 1970s, Formigraphic Engine Co. used the dual-laser approach in the first commercial laser-prototyping project, a process it called photochemical machining. In the late 1970s, Dynell Electronics Corp. was assigned a series of patents on solid photography. DEVELOPMENT OF SEREOLITHOGRAPHY- Hideo Kodama of the Nagoya Municipal Industrial Research Institute (Nagoya, Japan) was among the first to invent the single-beam laser curing approach, according to several sources. In October 1980, Kodama published a paper titled Three-Dimensional Data Display by Automatic Preparation of a Three-Dimensional Model that outlined his work in detail. His experiments consisted of projecting UV rays using a Toshiba mercury lamp and a photosensitive resin called Tevistar. In August 1982, Alan Herbert of 3M Graphic Technologies Sector Laboratory published a paper titled Solid Object Generation in the Journal of Applied Photographic Engineering. In this paper, Herbert described a system that directs an Argon Ion laser beam onto the surface of photopolymer by means of a mirror system attached to an x-y pen plotter device. With the system, Herbert was able to create several small, basic shapes. In August 1984, Charles Hull, co-founder and chief technical officer of 3D Systems (at that time, in Valencia, California), applied for a U.S. patent titled Apparatus for Production of Three-Dimensional Objects by Stereolithography, which was granted in March 1986. Osaka Prefectural Industrial Research Institute In 1984, Yoji Marutani of the Osaka Prefectural Industrial Research Institute

    (OPIRI), also referred to as the Osaka Institute of Industrial Technology,

  • 2

    developed and demonstrated a stereolithography process. Its not clear whether his work was connected with Kodamas early work, although theres a very good chance that Marutani at least studied Kodamas May 1980 patent application and his October 1980 and November 1981 technical papers. Its also possible that Marutani obtained a copy of Herberts 1982 paper, but its doubtful that Marutani knew about Hulls and Andres work in 1984.OPIRI was later commercialized.

    1.2 Commercial History

    Additive manufacturing first emerged in 1987 with stereo lithography (SL) from

    3D Systems, a process that solidifies thin layers of ultraviolet (UV) light sensitive

    liquid polymer using a laser.

    In 1988,3D Systems and Ciba-Geigy partnered in SL materials development and

    commercialized the first-generation SLAs. After 3D Systems commercialized SL

    in the U.S., Japans NTT Data CMET and Sony/D-MEC commercialized versions of stereo lithography in 1988 and 1989, respectively. In 1990 Electro Optical

    Systems (EOS) of Germany sold its first Stereo lithography system.

    In 1991, three AM technologies were commercialized, including fused

    deposition modeling (FDM) from Stratasys , solid ground curing (SGC) from

    Cubital, and laminated object manufacturing (LOM) from Helisys. Selective laser

    sintering (SLS) from DTM (now a part of 3D Systems) and the Soli form stereo

    lithography system from Teijin Seiki became available in 1992. In 1993, Soligen

    commercialized direct shell production casting (DSPC). Using an inkjet

    mechanism, DSPC deposited liquid binder onto ceramic powder to form shells for

    use in the investment-casting process. Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    (MIT) invented and patented the process that Soligen used. 1994 was a year of

    many new additive-manufacturing system introductions. Model Maker from

    Solidscape (then called Sanders Prototype) became available, as did new systems

    from Japanese and European companies. In 1996, Stratasys introduced the Genisys

    machine, which used an extrusion process similar to FDM but based on technology

    developed at IBMs Watson Research Center. In 1998, Beijing Yinhua Laser Rapid Prototypes Making & Mould Technology Co., Ltd. stepped up the promotion of its

    products. In March 1999, 3D Systems introduced a faster and less expensive

    version of Actua 2100 called Thermo Jet.

    April 2000 was a month full of new

    technology introductions. Objet Geometries of Israel announced Quadra, a 3D

    inkjet printer that deposited and hardened photopolymer using 1,536 nozzles and a

    UV light source. In early 2002, Stratasys introduced its Dimension product at a

    price of $29,900. The Dimension machine, which deposits ABS plastic, is based on

  • 3

    the former Prodigy product. In February 2003, Z Corp. introduced its ZPrinter 310

    system. The product, then priced at $29,900, uses technology similar to the

    companys other powder based 3D printers. At EuroMold 2004, EOS introduced the EOSINT P 385, a plastic material system capable of thinner layers than were

    possible with its predecessor.

    In April 2005, 3D Systems unveiled the Sinter station Pro, a large-frame laser

    sintering machine with part breakout, powder handling, and recycling. In February

    2006, 3D Systems announced its In Vision DP (dental professional) system that

    includes an In Vision 3D printer and 3D scanner for the dental market. In January

    2007, 3D Systems announced the V-Flash 3D printer. It uses film transfer and

    flash-imaging technology. In January 2010, Stratasys and HP signed an agreement

    for Stratasys to manufacture an exclusive line of HP-branded 3D printers. In March

    2010, Stratasys extended its SMART supports capability to its entire line of

    Dimension and Fortus machines, allowing for build time reductions of up to 14%

    and reduction in support material by 40%.

    1.3 Manufacturing Systems Four major types of manufacturing processes are typically considered-

    1) Forming- It is probably one of the oldest form. In forming process something is smashed into desired shape. For example forging, rolling,

    extrusion and drawing.

  • 4

    2) Joining process- In joining process two substances are joined to produce desired shapes. Well known processes are like welding, soldering and

    brazing.

    3) Removal processes or subtractive machining- In this process metal is removed to get the desired shape. We start with a lump of material, cut it

    away, cut it away .cut it away until the desired shape is obtained.

    4) Additive manufacturing- In this process we start with some form of material and we keep adding to it layer by layer typically to create a desired shape.It

    starts with a powder and laser cause them to bond together.

  • 5

    Chapter 2

    Most Prevalent Processes in AM

    2.1 Stereolithography

    Process-Thin layer of UV sensitive liquid polymers are solidified

    through the use of laser.

    Basic Principle- Stereolithography is a photopolymerisation

    process, where under exposure of UV radiation small molecules

    (monomers) in a resin form larger molecules. Three main photopolymer

    system used in it are acrylate, epoxy resin and vinyl ether.

    Figure 2.1 Stereolithography: (1) at the start of the process, in which the

    initial layer is added to the platform; and (2) after several layers have

    been added so that the part geometry gradually takes form.

  • 6

    2.1.1Part Built Time

    Time to complete a single layer :

    where Ti = time to complete layer i; Ai = area of layer i; v = average

    scanning speed of the laser beam at the surface; D = diameter of the

    spot size, assumed circular; and Td = delay time between layers to reposition the worktable

    Once the Ti values have been determined for all layers, then the build

    cycle time is:

    where Tc = SLA build cycle time; and nl = number of layers used to

    approximate the part

    Time to build a part ranges from one hour for small parts of simple

    geometry up to several dozen hours for complex parts.

    Benefits-

    No milling or masking steps needed. Can be highly accurate Only one material needed for build and support

    Downsides-

    Requires post curing of material Long term curing can lead to warping Can have brittle parts with a tacky surface Support structures are often needed Material is toxic and light sensitive

  • 7

    2.2 Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM)

    Process-

    Heated thermoplastics are extruded through nozzles , extruded

    material hardens as it cools.

    Basic Principle-

    Process starts with a 3D CAD model sliced into thin layers in Z-axis.

    These sliced layers are used to drive an extrusion head of FDM machine.

    The building material, in the form of a thin solid filament, is fed from a

    spool to a movable head controlled by servomotors. Second filament is

    fed from adjacent nozzle for support material, used to give support for

    overhanged or cantilever features. The filament reaches the liquifier

    head, melts it and then extruded through a nozzle onto the part surface.

    After covering the whole cross section build platform descends by one

    layer thickness to lay down the next layer. Process repeats itself until full

    3D part is formed. The temperature of machine chamber is precisely

    controlled below the melting point of the material so that only little

    amount of heat is required to melt the filament and on the other hand

    part need to be kept cool enough so that the molten material solidifies

    upon contact.

    Fig 2.2

  • 8

    Benefits-

    Can use standard engineering thermoplastics such as ABS.

    Can use multiple materials (One for bulid, one for support)

    Can produce water tight parts

    Parts are hardened very quickly

    Downsides-

    Poor layer uniformity

    Delamination of extruded layers can be problematic

    Parts can have a rather coarse surface finish

    2.3 3D Printing

    Process- Molten/liquid plastics printed along with wax support structure.

    Basic Principle-

    3DP also known as 3D printing works on FDM principle as a layered

    manufacturing process. 3DP offers prototypes with thermoplastic

    Polyester material. A thin bead of molten plastic is extruded through the

    computer controlled nozzle, which is deposited on a layer-by-layer basis

    to construct a prototype directly from 3D CAD data. The technology is

    commonly applied to initial conceptual design.

    Fig 2.3

  • 9

    Benefits-

    Can be fast

    Can do very fine details

    Relatively clean/ office friendly

    Downsides-

    Can be expensive

    Removal of wax

    Support structure material necessary

    2.4 Sintering

    Process-

    Lasers used to selectively sinter/fuse layers of powdered materials.

    Basic Principle- SLS process produces parts directly from 3D CAD

    model; layer by layer similar to SLA but rather than liquid resin powder

    is used. The CO2 Laser provides a concentrated heating beam which is

    traced over the tightly compacted layer of fine heat-fusible powder. The

    temperature in the entire chamber is maintained little below the melting

    point of the powder. So laser slightly raises the temperature to cause

    sintering, means welding without melting. For next level, piston moves

    down along with the formed object and powder is spread with a roller

    for next layer. Process repeats until full object is formed.

  • 10

    Fig 2.4

    Benefits-

    Can be very strong

    Can use nylons, elastomers , metals (e.g. Ti and stainless steel)

    Powder support material easy to remove

    Can create hard/dense part

    Downsides-

    Powdery , rough, porous surface

    Can be very expensive

  • 11

    Chapter 3 Design Analysis and Comparisions

    3.1 Stereolithographic design

    Dimensional parameters:-

    Each layer in SLA is 0.076 mm to 0.50 mm (0.003 in to 0.020 in.) thick

    Thinner layers provide better resolution and more intricate shapes; but processing time is longer

    Starting materials are liquid monomers

    Polymerization occurs on exposure to UV light produced by laser scanning beam

    Scanning speeds ~ 500 to 2500 mm/s

    RenShape SL 7560 -

    Description

    SL 7560 is durable SLA material that simulates ABS - like parts,

    provides good combination of durability and rigidity.

    Use of this material-

    Suitable for Durable and rigid parts with having outstanding appearance

    Excellent for RTV patterns and functional applications. Excellent side wall finish and fine features and good temperature performance.

    Somos WaterClear 10120:

    Description

    Somos WaterClear 10120 is a high-speed liquid photo-polymer that

    produces strong, rigid and durable parts with optical clarity.

    Use of this material

    This material is especially useful in applications requiring optical

    clarity such as fluid flow analysis, stress analysis or transparent show

  • 12

    models where internal features need to be displayed. Other application

    where strong and durable products without the brittleness.

    3.2 Fused Deposition Modeling Design

    How the FDM process works

    First, a part model is created in a STL file with AutoCad or another design program..

    The model needs to be imported into Stratasys software, Insight. The software slices the .stl file into horizontal layers mathematically, generating the required supports.

    Insight creates tool paths required for the extrusion head. The system draws cross-sectional layers one at a time in the X, Y, and Z coordinate by using a heated material extrusion process.

    How the parts built

    Import the .stl file of part model into Stratasys software, Insight, which slices the model into horizontal layers.

    The supports are created if they are needed and the tool paths for the extrusion head are planned.

    ABS material feeds into the temperature-controlled FDM extrusion head, where it is heated to a semi-liquid state.

    The head extrudes and deposits the material in 0.254mm layers onto a fixtureless base, one layer at a time in X and Y coordinates first.

    When the layer is finished, the head moves in Z direction to the next layer.

    Each layer is extruded with precision, and the layers are bonded and solidified.

    The designed object becomes a solid three-dimensional part.

  • 13

    Material :-

    Tough,Durable and accurate parts for functional testing.

    When functionality is more important than surface finish.

    Cost:-

    The cost to create a part on FDM depends on the time and materials used

    to create the part. Since FDM builds upon layers, complexity is less of

    an issue on cost and rather it is the work to create mass that consumes

    resources. Therefore, creating bigger parts becomes costly using FDM.

    Small parts can be created for under $50, with larger parts costing more.

    Time:-

    Like cost, the time it takes to create a part using FDM depends on the

    size of the part. Each layer created requires time to set before the next

    layer can be placed on top and the process to continue. So it can be seen

    that dimensionally longer parts with mass will take more time to create

    rather than smaller, hollow parts. The range in tame it takes to create

    these parts will vary from a couple of hours to multiple days.

  • 14

    3.3 3D PRINTING

    3DP also known as 3D printing, this Printer allows to try new design

    iterations quickly and cheaply. The printer uses durable polyester

    material. These concept models will provide considerable functional

    strength and can be drilled, tapped, and sanded. These Polyester parts

    are little flexible and can also be used for limited snap fitting features.

    Materials:-

    Use of this material:-

    Durable parts for limited testing and it is suitable for parts where little

    flexibility is needed.

  • 15

    3.4 Sintering SLS system provides a wide variety of material choices enable us to

    create functional prototypes, direct tooling, and patterns - even final

    parts. Being able to use polymers, glass-filled nylon, metal and

    composites give a lot of flexibility to quickly produce one or many

    components without the typical delays associated with traditional

    manufacturing methods.

    Materials:-

    Material Class - Thermoplastic

    Use of this material

    DuraForm PA material is ideal for parts with superior surface quality, fine details and functional features such as living hinges and snap fit

    connections. Plus DuraForm PA material can be used for modeling and

    testing surgical devices and can be sterilized with an autoclave.

    DuraForm GF material's increased stiffness, heat resistance and mechanical integrity make it perfect material for extreme testing

    conditions, e.g. DuraForm connector with snap fits, hinges and locking

    cams recently withstood temperature up to 100C and an electrical

    charge of 460 Amps.

    Benefits

    Durable parts without tooling

    Heat and chemical resistant, Machinable, weldable and has excellent

    surface quality High feature definition and detail, High durability and

    stability

  • 16

    3.5 Comparisions

  • 17

    Brief about all the technologies-

    SLA- Excellent surface finish suitable for presentation, master models

    and light functional testing.

    FDM- Good combination of strength and surface finish at affordable

    price and lead time.

    3DP- Suitable for general purpose parts for initial design stage with a

    quick delivery

    SLS- Range of materials available, soft like rubber to strong like metal.

    SLS Nylon suitable for snap and living hinge features

    CNC- Use when mechanical properties cannot be compromised with any

    additive RP process.

  • 18

    Chapter 4 4. AM Applications

    4.1 Aerospace

    The aerospace industry desires parts that are lightweight and

    strong and sometimes electrically conductive. They are seeking

    a standard set of AM materials, as well as a design manual for

    the materials and processes, but neither are currently available.

    Furthermore, they require material and process standards that

    ensure part quality and consistency across machines and builds.

    Turbine blades made by direct metal laser sintering (DMLS)

    from EOS (a German manufacturer of laser sintering/melting

    systems) have found their way onto test rigs. Morris Tech

    believes that a variety of metal parts made by additive

    manufacturing will initially make their way onto flying aircraft

    in 2-3 years and will become common in 10 years.

    4.2 Surgery and dental

    The market for the production of dental products using AM is

    on the verge of explosive growth. Already many dental labs are

    using DMLS from EOS and other direct metal AM processes for

    the production of copings for crowns and bridges. EOS has

    reported that the dental business is currently its fastest growing

    area of AM for production applications

  • 19

    Fig 4.1

    4.3 Automotive and Motorsports

    The opportunity to use AM to manufacture parts for vehicles is

    substantial. Production runs of high-end, specialty cars are

    relatively small. Consequently, these products are candidates for

    using AM for part production. Already, companies such as

    Bentley and Rover have shown that it is feasible and have used

    AM for small, complex parts. Likewise, the motorsports

    industry (both cars and motorcycles) will benefit greatly from

    improved helmet design brought about from AM. This includes

    aftermarket products that are custom, semicustom,

    and standard.

    4.4 Cellular Design

    The ability to put material only where it is desired could have

    a profound impact on how parts are designed and

    manufacturing. Cellular materials are examples of materials

  • 20

    that are structured as repeated cells; their geometry enables a

    high degree of optimization which provides the opportunity

    for designers to control readily the distribution of material in a

    part. These materials can achieve high stiffness or strength per

    unit mass and can provide good energy absorption

    characteristics and good thermal and acoustic insulation

    properties

    4.5 Regenerative turbines

    The complexity of the modified blade profiles would normally

    necessitate the use of expensive computer numerically

    controlled machining with five-axis capability. With an impeller

    less than 75mm in diameter with a maximum blade thickness of

    1.3 mm, a rapid manufacturing technique enabled production of

    complex blade profiles that are dimensionally accurate and

    structurally robust enough for testing.

  • 21

    Chapter 5 AM and Environment

    They use excessive material as they are designed for processes such as

    machining and molding. Moreover, they are made in geographically

    disparate locations, often dictated by the location of tooling in low labor

    cost economies. There are a number of clear, potential benefits to the

    adoption of AM for part production, which could be driven by the

    sustainability agenda. These include:

    1). More efficient use of raw materials in powder/liquid form by

    displacing machining which uses solid billets

    2). Displacing of energy-inefficient manufacturing processes such as

    casting and CNC machining with eradication of cutting fluids and chips

    3). Ability to eliminate fixed asset tooling, allowing for manufacture at

    any geographic location such as next to the customer, reducing

    transportation costs within the supply chain and associated carbon

    emissions

    4). Lighter weight parts, which when used in transport products such as

    aircraft increase fuel efficiency and reduce carbon emissions

    5. Ability to manufacture optimally designed components that are in

    themselves more efficient than conventionally manufactured

    components by incorporating conformal cooling and heating channels,

    gas flow paths, etc.

  • 22

    CONCLUSION

    Additive manufacturing (AM) technology has been researched

    and developed for more than 20 years. Rather than removing

    materials, AM processes make three-dimensional parts directly

    from CAD models by adding materials layer by layer, offering

    the beneficial ability to build parts with geometric and material

    complexities that could not be produced by subtractive

    manufacturing processes. Through intensive research over the

    past two decades, significant progress has been made in the

    development and commercialization of new and innovative

    AM processes, as well as numerous practical applications in

    aerospace, automotive, biomedical, energy and other fields.

  • 23

    REFERENCES Jane Chu, Sarah Engelbrecht, Gregory Graf, David W. Rosen, (2010) "A

    comparison of synthesis methods for cellular structures with application

    to additive manufacturing", Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol. 16 Iss: 4,

    pp.275 283 Francis J. Quail, Thomas Scanlon and Matthew Strickland(2010)

    Development of a regenerative pump impeller using rapid manufacturing techniques ,Rapid Prototyping Journal Volume 16 Number 5 2010 pp 337344

    Tomaz Brajlih, Bogdan Valentan, Joze Balic, Igor Drstvensek, (2011) "Speed and accuracy evaluation of additive manufacturing machines",

    Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol. 17 Iss: 1, pp.64 75 http://wohlersassociates.com/terms.html http://additivemanufacturing.com/ http://www.ge.com/stories/additive-manufacturing http://www.docstoc.com/docs/71023917/ADDITIVE-

    MANUFACTURING-AND-THE-ENVIRONMENT

    http://www.arptech.com.au/slshelp.htm