Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
3D Conjugate Heat Transfer
Analysis of the Next
Generation Inner Reflector
Plug for the Spallation
Neutron Source
Ashraf Abdou
Oak Ridge National Laboratory , Oak Ridge TN, USA
STAR Global Conference 2013
Orlando, Florida, USA
March 18-20, 2013
2 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy STAR Global Conference 2013
The Spallation Neutron Source at ORNL
LINAC
Accelerate the beam to 1 GeV
Accumulator Ring
Compress 1 msec long
pulse to 700 nsec
Target building & neutron
instruments Proton beam pulses to Target at 60 Hz
Central Laboratory
& Office Complex
Center for Nanophase Material Science
3 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy STAR Global Conference 2013
SNS Instruments Cover a Wide Range of Science
18 neutron beam lines
some accommodate more that 1 instrument
4 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy STAR Global Conference 2013
Proton Beam Liquid Mercury Target Module
Reflector Plugs
SNS Target Systems Core Region
5 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy STAR Global Conference 2013
SNS Target Systems Core Region
Inner Reflector Plug
Outer Reflector Plug
Core Vessel
Proton Beam Window
Neutron Beam Lines Target
Moderators (4)
Proton
Beam
6 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy STAR Global Conference 2013
CFD Simulations of SNS Systems
• SNS Systems are built in PRO-E Creo parametrics
• Neutronics Analysis
– Codes: MCNPX and other codes
– Volumetric power deposition in Liquids and solids
• Thermal-Hydraulic Analysis
– Codes: STAR-CCM+V7, ANSYS-CFX, Fluent V14.5 and ICEM-CFD
– Grids: conformal Hexahedral and Polyhedral
– Conjugate Heat Transfer Analysis
– Two-Phase Flow for Gas layers and gas bubbles
– Fluids: Liquid mercury, heavy and light water, supercritical hydrogen and gases
• Stress Analysis
– Codes: ABAQUS and ANSYS
7 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy STAR Global Conference 2013
2nd
Generation Inner Reflector Plug (IRP)
Proton
Beam Target
Middle Reflector Plug
(MRP)
Lower IRP SS, Be, Al, and Cd
31.75” OD X 73” tall, 7000 lbs.
Intermediate IRP Stainless Steel
31.75” OD X 22” tall, 4095 lbs.
Be
Be
Existing IRP
8 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy STAR Global Conference 2013
2nd
Generation MRP Design
Outlet Inlet
80 gpm
40 C
Aluminum Can
2 SS inserts
Inle
t s
ide
Ou
tle
t s
ide
Proton Beam
0.25 inch
0.25 inch
Hole diameters in the inlet side is 0.5 inch
Hole diameters in the outlet side is 0.375 inch
Heavy Water
Water Plenum
9 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy STAR Global Conference 2013
2nd
Generation IRP Design
Beryllium Aluminum
Light Water
Pre-Moderators
Heavy Water
40 gpm
40 C
40 gpm
40 C
Outlet
15 gpm each
40 C
15.85 gpm
40 C
15.85 gpm
40 C
10 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy STAR Global Conference 2013
Volumetric Heat Generation (W/m3) in Aluminum
at 2 MW Beam Power
IRP MRP
11 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy STAR Global Conference 2013
Water/AL interface
Temperature Contours at Water/SS, Water/AL and
Water tubes/SS interfaces
Water/SS interface
SS/Water tubes interface
SS Insert1
SS Insert2
12 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy STAR Global Conference 2013
SNS Mercury Target Module
Mercury vessel surrounded by a water-cooled shroud
Bulk mercury flow
Water-cooled Shroud
Mercury Target Vessel
Proton Beam
quasi-stagnation region at the
center of the window
Re = 0.7×106
12 L/s
13 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy STAR Global Conference 2013
Conjugate Heat Transfer of SNS Liquid Mercury
(1.54 MW Beam Power)
Deposited Power In SS: 63.8 kW
Deposited Power in HG: 777.46 kW
Constant Volume Heating Process Leads
to Large Pressure Pulse in Liquid Mercury
14 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy STAR Global Conference 2013
Conjugate Heat Transfer of SNS Liquid
Mercury
• K- SST Mentor turbulence model
• Turbulent Prantdl number
15 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy STAR Global Conference 2013
Cavitation Damage Erosion of the Target Module
Target # 8 is running at about 1 MW Beam Power
Specimen diameter: 60 mm
Original thickness: 3 mm
Off-center, bulk Hg surface Center, bulk Hg surface
16 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy STAR Global Conference 2013
Textured SNS window: 24 L/s
Conical pits
Stagnation Zone
Vertical V Grooves
Gas Injection: 500 sccm per port
Vertical V Grooves
Horizontal V Grooves Horizontal V Grooves Horizontal V Grooves Horizontal V Grooves
Horizontal V Grooves Horizontal V Grooves
Sweeping Mercury Flow Sweeping Mercury Flow
Close up view
17 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy STAR Global Conference 2013
Experiments in liquid Mercury:
Video of Textured Gas Wall at the window (24L/s)
Conical Pits
Vertical
Grooves
Vertical
Grooves
He gas injection at 500 sccm each
Horizontal
Feeder
Grooves
18 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy STAR Global Conference 2013
Time Averaged Helium VF Contours
19 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy STAR Global Conference 2013
Animation of Gas Volume Fraction contours (24 L/s)
20 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy STAR Global Conference 2013
Summary
• STAR-CCM+ is being used at SNS for :
– conjugate heat transfer with water in complex geometries
– conjugate heat transfer with liquid metal in separated flows
– Two-Phase flow for developing gas wall layer over textured wall
• The simulations provide guidance for the experiments, and may be used as a diagnostic tool for probing inside the opaque mercury. CFD is thus demonstrated to be a promising method for optimization of a gas wall to mitigate cavitation erosion of the SNS target.
Comments:
• Communication between PRO-E Creo and STAR-CCM+ CAD thru 3D CAD Exchange to
prepare the models for conformal polyhedral grid
• Interface Imprinter in STAR-CCM+ CAD with importing Para solid and IGES files
• Parametric studies: Writing the solution settings, BCs and etc. into a file then read this file for
different cases for easy setup for the models
• Comparison between mapped interfaces with direct and indirect mapping for both conformal and
non- conformal grids
21 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy STAR Global Conference 2013
Thanks for your attention