Upload
jojetone
View
212
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
ENTEL PCS
Citation preview
EnTelPCSBig3GS C f l i th R GiSucCesfulintheReGion
GSMLAMiami,June2010F i O h AFranciscoOchoaA
Agenda
About EntelPCS 3G Services in the Region Why move towards LTE?
C l ti Conclutions
2
Ab t E t lPCSAbout EntelPCS
3
General Information
Chile, 90%+ mobile penetration16 Mill 16+ Mill pop.
Entel PCS 6+ Mill Subs 1900 MHz GSM Since 1998 HSDPA 3.6 Mbps since Dec 2006 LTE Trial from December 2009 to March 2010
4
Network Elements
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
ENTELPCS 2006 TO 2010(Acummulative Values)2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
RBS 1746 2304 3254 3700 3748BSC 22 28 33 36 38MSC-S 3 8 9 9 9MGW 3 11 18 22 24HLR 4 4 5 5 5
2G
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010NODE B 0 253 736 1623 3026
186%
290%220%
RNC 0 1 14 23 25Exp. RNC 0 0 6 12 16
CHE 0 16.192 108.928 285.952 390.208
3G
186%
Capacity (Gbps) 0 0,4 1 3,2 8,6250%
320%268%
Growth Factors
5
Subscribers, Traffics and Sites
Abonados BAM
71.968600.000
700.000 HS 3G GPRS/EDGE
Abonados Voz
7.476.679
7 500 000
8.000.000
582.74380.186300.000
400.000
500.000
A
b
o
n
a
d
o
s
B
A
M
6.260.616
6.813.316
6 000 000
6.500.000
7.000.000
7.500.000
A
b
o
n
a
d
o
s
58 veces
33%
67.832
233.59170.390
10.14934.261
-
100.000
200.000
2007 2008 2009 2010
A
5.613.320
5.000.000
5.500.000
6.000.000
2007 2008 2009 2010
Intensidad de Trfico en BH
75.000
80.000
3,50
4,00Trafico Voz BH [Erlangs]Trfico Datos BH [Gbps]
Distribucin de sitios 3.7483.702
3.2562637
3 000
4.000
s
Sitios 2G Sitios 3G Adicionales 3G
62 5%
Distribucin de sitios 3.7483.702
3.2562637
3 000
4.000
s
Sitios 2G Sitios 3G Adicionales 3G
62 5%
50.000
55.000
60.000
65.000
70.000
E
r
l
a
n
g
s
1,00
1,50
2,00
2,50
3,00
G
b
p
s
12 veces
2.306
1.748
580
1171
1.000
2.000
3.000
C
a
n
t
i
d
a
d
d
e
s
i
t
i
o
s
9,4 veces
62,5%
70%2G/3G
2.306
1.748
580
1171
1.000
2.000
3.000
C
a
n
t
i
d
a
d
d
e
s
i
t
i
o
s
9,4 veces
62,5%
70%2G/3G
40.000
45.000
2006 2007 2008 2009 20100,00
0,5059
253580
120
- 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
/
59253
580
120
- 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
/
6
EntelPCS Competitors
3G2G
Access Network
3G2G
Access Network
3G2G
Access Network
3G2G
Access Network
C
o
r
e
N
e
t
w
o
r
k
P
a
c
k
e
t
C
o
r
e
C
o
r
e
N
e
t
w
o
r
k
P
a
c
k
e
t
C
o
r
e
7
3G Services: DL= 14 Mbps, UL=5,8 Mbps
8
3G Servers: Node B (Start Up & Current Configuration)
Configuration 2006 1Raxb64 + 1 HSTX1516 user, 5 code
Configuration 2007 1Raxb128 + 1 HSTX4532 user, 10 code
Configuration 2008 2Raxb128 + 1 HSTX4532 se 10 code EUL32 user, 10 code, EUL
Configuration 2009 3Raxb128 + 1 HSTX6064 user, 15 code, EUL
Transmisin(HSTX)
Recepcin(RAXB)
Cdigos HSDPAEULEUL
Cdigos HSDPAEUL
Usuarios HSDPACE R99 DL CE R99 UL
9
3G KPI :Troughput User HSDPA
10
3G KPI : HSDPA Accesibility.
Network Value Evolution
29
253035
17
8
16
4
05
10152025
4 5 6 7 8
#
C
e
l
d
a
s
% Celdas OK Primario 91,28%% Celdas OK Secundario 90,76%
4 5 6 7 8
# S em anas pres entes en rank ing c ons ec ut ivas
7 37
10
60
80
100
120
d
a
s
101 105 89 80
0
20
40
60
#
C
e
l
20 21 22 23
PRIMARIO SECUNDARIO
11
Umbral Segmento Primario 98% Segmento Secundario 98%
3G Powerful Backbone IP
12
3G N t k i th R i3G Network in the Region
13
Mobile wireless outlook
HSDPA Deployment mainly in 850 MHz and 1900 MHz in band VenezuelaGSM / CDMA850 MHz / 900 MHz /1900 MHz3G EVDO & UMTS, First 3G
3G HSDPA Deployment in South America
2006 Chile1H 2007 Argentina2H 2007 Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay
900MHz network in L.A.
2008 Peru, Colombia, Ecuador, Bolivia
HSDPA users in the regionBrazilGSM / CDMA / 3G HSDPA (850/2100)850 MHz / 900 MHz / 1800
HSDPA users in the region
0 40 %231 17%22 1296 682Bolivia
2,99 %207,92%1.510.627490.598Argentina
% TotalGROWTH %Q2 2010Q2 2009HSDPA
0 40 %231 17%22 1296 682Bolivia
2,99 %207,92%1.510.627490.598Argentina
% TotalGROWTH %Q2 2010Q2 2009HSDPA
850 MHz / 900 MHz / 1800 MHz
4,09 %254,28%1.695.411478.555Colombia
5,41 %212,18%1.004.355321.726Chile
3,95 %302,57%7.403.8591.839.167Brazil
0,40 %231,17%22.1296.682Bolivia
4,09 %254,28%1.695.411478.555Colombia
5,41 %212,18%1.004.355321.726Chile
3,95 %302,57%7.403.8591.839.167Brazil
0,40 %231,17%22.1296.682Bolivia
2,32 %94,51%73.48637.781Uruguay
0,60 %208,96%126.09440.813Peru
0,71 % 294,85%43.98611.140Paraguay
2,32 %94,51%73.48637.781Uruguay
0,60 %208,96%126.09440.813Peru
0,71 % 294,85%43.98611.140Paraguay
14Source: Wireless Intelligence, Infocentre GSM
Wh t d LTE?Why move towards LTE?
15
Coverage and price, satellite case (Chile)
Rapid uptake of
Number of TV subscribers, Chile
satellite services
Price reduction of STB
Recent reduction in
26%
Recent reduction in monthly fare and prepaid satellite (25 USD)
5 %
)
Satellite in triple packs
The Satellite case proves that nationwide coverage with a wireless service, a lower price point and subsidized terminal can attract new segments.
16
Broadband penetration, Chilean case
Almost Half of the households have access toInternet
Mobile Internet had a great user growth inMobile Internet had a great user growth in2010 (200%+) and is having a averagemonthly growth of 13% (VS 1% of Fixed)
Source: Chilean Telecoms Regulator (SUBTEL)
20010 estimate
Internet penetration per Household Income
However the broadband service is present mainly in the higher income households (V and IV in the graphic)
V: Higher Income
I: Lower Income
Source: SUBTEL
17
Source: SUBTEL
South America Broadband / Households
Fi l dCompared with USA and Western
Broadband Household Penetration by country
Canada
France
United Kingdom
Finalndp
European countries, the broadband per household penetration is very low
Also the average broadband speed in S th A i i l th th
Chil
Italy
Austria
United StatesSouth America is lower than other regions. 69% of the connections are below 1 Mbps of speed
Venezuela
Brazil
Argentina
Chile
South America average broadband speeds
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Peru
Colombia
35%
31%Lower than 512 kbps
512 Kbps - 1 Mbps
More Than 1 Mbps
broadband speeds
Source: CIA WF, Fitch, OECD, IDC34%
18
34%
Technical characteristics of LTE
Better indoor coverage with OFDM than WCDMA?
More than 30% of Actual 3G users have fixed indoor behavior
Higher throughput and higher overall capacity?
Massive use of Internet in mobile handsets and video portals in mobile broadband will pcreate congestion in urban areas
A new technology in fresh spectrum?
The uptake in the number of connected devices and traffic is higher than the capacity t GSM t t d HSPAto move GSM spectrum towards HSPA
Harmonized spectrum and worldwide adoption will mean economies of scale in terminals to smaller operators?
This is the main difference with Wimax, the possibility of a truly global economy ofThis is the main difference with Wimax, the possibility of a truly global economy of scale in terminals and networks
New interconnected devices and LTE in every machine?
Mayor operators are seeing LTE as a opportunity for new devices, M2M, smart meters, etc. this could drive several tangible services to improve the country lifestyle (ie, health)
19
Conclutions
We need move towards LTE because we need more capacity for the users.
All people want the maximum available data speed rate even for the current service like a newspaper in the webcurrent service like a newspaper in the web.
LTE will make sense if covers new segments or if deliver cheaper capacity than current options for broadband service.
For LTE is need carry out a high speed transport network project, otherwise could reduce the LTE scope only to highly dense area.
Latam internet penetration is very low in comparison with U S A andLatam internet penetration is very low in comparison with U.S.A. and Europe, so the broadband service have a very big opportunity in the Region.
20
Thank youThank you
21