28
: 30 / 03 / 95 : 07 / 08 / 95 Journal of Measurement & Educational Evaluation Studies !" 16 %&’ 1395 +, 116 - 89 Vol. 6, No. 16, Winter 2017 : ) ! " #$% &#’ (!)* ( ,-./* "#-0 123 * #456 ! ! * * 7 0 89#3 * * * :!;< /0 1023 45 67 89 %:’0 ; 1; % < % ; . >? @ 600 1; B C ;9 DE& 7 6 89 %:’0 "3 BFG H9 90 I3 ;; . "&J K LH9 M G&’N0 ?O9 - 2? N&K LH9 LJ 0 % P 67 >Q0 . R I3 S ! R ;; 0 LH9 ;T& . LH9 U 0 0F V22 SPSS V8.80 LISREL Multilog UP . V?& +C WN LK ; 67 >? ;; %" K LH9 N B 0 H9 FG %:’0 89 .X ;C ) 196 / - ) H9 X"3 ( 206 / - ( ) XN] 121 / 0 ) ^N_ ( 231 / - ( ) X; ; 01 / 0 pN&K .( 67 89 %:’0 ;T& ‘?4 T aNJ LJ 67 85 / 0 b 78 / 0 ;C 67 b 79 / 0 X; J G0 4 ? X 1E ; . ;; 0 I3 M 0 ! R N X; d9 0 % ; ; 8 / 0 - 9 1 / 2 + &3 2? ; . &? 0 1023 G >? X J E’ 7 6 89 %:’0 ; R 1; % 0 ?& 2? 0 % P Lb Nb ;C X %9 % %K F N& ; 1023 0 % &C ;T& ;J . = > "!/0 : 67 89 %:’0 b b * % &J; P"; ; &9 % G" f’ ’?) [email protected] ( * * &J; P"; % % G"; &9 * * * ?;& % % G"; &9

jresearch.sanjesh.org · 30 / 03 / 95 : 07 / 08 / 95 Journal of Measurement & Educational Evaluation Studies ˘ ˇ ˆ˙ ˝ Vol. 6, No. 16, Winter 2017 89 -11 6+, 1395 %&’ 16 ˘

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: jresearch.sanjesh.org · 30 / 03 / 95 : 07 / 08 / 95 Journal of Measurement & Educational Evaluation Studies ˘ ˇ ˆ˙ ˝ Vol. 6, No. 16, Winter 2017 89 -11 6+, 1395 %&’ 16 ˘

:�

����

���

���

30

/03

/95

��

��

��

:�

����

07

/08

/95

������ ����� ������������ �������� � ���� Journal of Measurement & Educational Evaluation Studies

��� ����� !"� 16 %�&'�� 1395 +,116- 89 Vol. 6, No. 16, Winter 2017

��������� ��� ����� ������ �����:������ ����) ��!��"�� ���� #$% �&#�' �(!)*(

�,�-.�/* "#-0 123∗

#456� !��� !��∗∗

�7� ��0 8��9#3∗∗∗

:!�;< /�0 �� 10�23 �4�5 ������� 6��7� �8��9 %:�'�0 �; 1��;%���� �<� %����� ;�� .>?�� ��@�� 600 1��;���� � B�� �������� ��C ��;��9�� D�E&�� ���� � � �7�6�

�8��9 %:�'�0 � ���"��3 BF�G�� ����H9 �9��0 I��3 ��;�; ."&J� ����K L��H9 � �����M� �G&'N�0 ���?O9- ��2?� ����� ���� ��N&K� L��H9 � LJ ���� ��0%����P�� 6��7�

>��Q�0 .�� ��R� �� ��� I��3 S��� !�����R ���� �������� �;�;�0 � L��H9 �;�T&�� ��. L��H9U�� �� ����� ��0 ��0��F��V22SPSS V8.80LISREL �Multilog U�P�� �� . V?�&�

+C�� �� � ��� W�N�� L��K �; �� 6��7� >?� ;�; %�"� ����K L��H9 �N���� B���� ��0����H9 �F�G�� �� %:�'�0 �8��9 .X�� ��;��C�� )196/-) ����H9 X��"�3 (206/- (

) ���� �� XN�]121/0) ^�N_�� ���� � (231/-��� ���� () X��; ���;01/0p≤��N&K� .( 6��7� �8��9 %:�'�0 �� �;�T&�� �� `?�4 ��T� a�N���J ���� LJ 6��7� 85/0 �����b

78/0 � ���� �;�C 6��7� ����b 79/0 X�; � ��� J �G�0 �4�?X1E� ;��. �;�;��0 I��3 ��M��0 �� ��� !�����R �������� �N���� X��; � d��9 �0��� %���� �; ���; 8/0- �9

1/2 +��&���3 ��2?� ;�� . &��?��0 10�23 �G���� >?� X�� J E'� ����� �7�6� �8��9 %:�'�0 �; ��R 1��;%����� ���� ��0 �?��&�� �� ��2?���0 %���P��� L��b ��Nb ��;��C�� X�� � ��%��9 �� %� �%���K ���F�� �N&� �; 10�23��0 %���&C���� ;�T&���

;�J.

=��> "!�/0: 6��7� �8��9 %:�'�0 ������� �����b ����b

∗ %��� ��&J; ��P"��;; �&���9 �����%���� ��G"�� ��f'� ���'?��)[email protected](

∗∗ ��&J; ��P"��;%���%���� ��G"��; �&���9 ����� ∗∗∗ �� ��?;�&%��� ����%���� ��G"��; �&���9 �����

Page 2: jresearch.sanjesh.org · 30 / 03 / 95 : 07 / 08 / 95 Journal of Measurement & Educational Evaluation Studies ˘ ˇ ˆ˙ ˝ Vol. 6, No. 16, Winter 2017 89 -11 6+, 1395 %&’ 16 ˘

90 �%8��A �*��%8� � "#�> :8!& ������� ����/�3

��!�� �� �@� �g'9�G?� )1978( L��9 �� %:�'�0 X,�� ���J ���� ��0�"� ���79 � 3h �� %� ��9 X�����0 �Fi� �� ;���� � ��.�0; ��� X�� >g�� �K��&R� �8��9

XH9 �&Nj� Lg� � �� ����� X�T�J �kO9�� � U��9 ;�R� �� >?������ .�0; ���b �8g" ��;��C�� �?:�� X��0� �� �K��&R� �8��9X�� l�g'�� � hm�� ��&3)1 2005.(

����G���� �; �;�?� ��0 �&'?F<� �� �<�� ���k� � %:�'�0 ���� ;��� �; ��C� ��0�� ���� ;��� J �&b� �� %�J;�J .��� ;�R� � %�J;�J3 �9 ����8��H9 ���; %�?� �

���� %��� >?�&"�� ;�C�� ��n� ���� �; � ��C �� S��C �; ��oH� .���J��0 W�4�� >?� ��� �� �;�?� &��� ���,���� J �0 � �&C��� ��� �; ��<� 17�

1��; �K��&R� �; 68J � ���� 17� ����� � p���C� %�77H� ��� ����; %�����Lg�� ����'5� ����1��; ��&�� � �0��� %����� b8K��� ������� � LJ�) ���2 2005 1E� %:�'�0 .(��R�?q3��?�� � �K��&R� ����� �� J ��&'0 ���� ��

�G?; %�J;�J ����H9kO9�� �� � r?�g"� %83�J >s >����) ����q�hg?��'R��3 2005�?�� � �� t4 2007�Q�0 .(:�'�0 ���� � ���� >��� %����9

�%���K ���� �;����C �� ��R �K��&R� ��0!0%��� X,�� ���� � ��� ���� �?�0 ��0%:�'�0 �8��9 �� >?� �� .��J ;�P?� %��R�� � v;�J ���� ��C �; ���� ��

!<��9?> �� J X�� �;�����; ����9 ��� L��H9 &��; 17� %������� ���� � 1P�� >?� %�F�� � �0��� �� %� �; d���R w�&E� ���� ����4 X�� .10�23��0 ���

���� 1P�� ���� �; %:�'�0 �8��9 B��F� ;�C ���� ��� ��JO9 �0; ��;�J1��; ��0��&�� ��0�"� �� �? ��� �3 �<�� �8��9 � %�������;�� ��� �0�� %��G"0�23

6��� �� ���N� ��@� � �9���;� J �; >?� ���� ;�R� X��; ���"��39 �?�0>?�� ��;�J .�g? �� >?� �0��F�� ���"��3;�� �� J >���0 � F����95 )7200 (�5��x ��;�J .

>?� ��F�� +&E� %����R�� J ;�� �� %:�'�0 �8��9 �%���K ������ ���;� )����b � %�� �����b6( ���P�� .�� �@� ����� ��� ���� ��� �K��&R� ��0 ��

1 . Petry, Maes & Vlaskamp 2 . Eccles & Roeser 3 . Rubin, Chen, Coplan, Buskirk & Wojslawowics 4 . Bee & Boyd 5 . Tarshis & Huffman 6 . Bullying & Victimization

Page 3: jresearch.sanjesh.org · 30 / 03 / 95 : 07 / 08 / 95 Journal of Measurement & Educational Evaluation Studies ˘ ˇ ˆ˙ ˝ Vol. 6, No. 16, Winter 2017 89 -11 6+, 1395 %&’ 16 ˘

... ����� ������ ����� � �� �� ������� 91

�� !0��� ����b ����h?���) ��J1 1993X���� � ��&?� t2 1993.( ����b Lg�

,�C� ���P9 ��X�� ��� w?�9 J ���K ��� �;�T&�� d���� >��O9 ��� ;��) S�;�?�J �3 1987%�� �����b � ����b �� ���� ��b�T9� .( J ��� �0 .X'�� !0 �� ��R

�JJ;� �� db�� X?y� � ���� ;����� ��0�"� �� �; �����b ��&�� �K�� � � ;���� ;1��; ��s �? r?�� ���b ����b z�� �; �T�� ��&�� r? U�P�� �� �G?; ������� ��

h?���)1999� .( �T�� ��&�� >?� ��8K ���x � �;��� ���@�� � %����� `���%�&G�?���) X�� �����b4 1993 J X�� ���K ����b >��Q�0 .( ���x �; � !@��

�� {�T9� %��� ��x10�23 .�&���;�; %�"� �0 %�� ;��� �� ��G��C�3 � ����b J ����?���0�� ���� �5 �� 10�J %� �� h3 � &��? 1?�F�� �� X�� >g�� ����b .���?

���%��R�� �? v;�J %� �; J ���� �?�0 � ;�C %:�'�0 >��Q�0 � �;�J X?�?�� ����� � ;��� ���� �0��1E� .X�� �?�R �K��&R� ��0 ���K�� �� X��"C �;

���� �; ��x >?� ���; L��� ����b X�� %:�'�0 �� ;��C�� �; ) ��3 ;�8?� � ��36 1990 �?�J � |�; t 1998 .(10�23 6��� ������b W��� �0 �; %��'3 �&"��

�� %��&C; X��d�x � %�G�Nx��� ��NJ�)��'3»w�« 1394 � %�G�Nx��� ��NJ� d�x��'3»D« 1394� ( �0��� %�J;�J � �0��� �� �;�T&�� �� �����b� �T�� �� L�Nb

��G��C�3 �g?F�� ��8J �? ��] !�7&'� �� ���b /�0 ;��� �� ;�C %:�'�0;��0 )%�&�� � X����7 1994t X���� � ����8 199410�23 .(�; �0 >?� ���; ��7&�� ��

%���; �J;�J � %���; ����R�� 10�J >� 1?�F�� �� �����b �;�J B��F� ����� ) X���� �� � >���9 2001 .( � �� �@�>?� ��� 10�J ��� X�K � ���<���0

���7� �� �� � �<R�9 ����b U�7&�� ��?�R �� {�T9� �&��)X���� � %���g�0 2001 .(���� �; %;�� �����b � ����b ;��� �; >��Q�0 ��0 ���&� � �?��&�� "� V?�&� %�

%�J;�J U��<s r? J ;�; ��5 �; ����; %;�� �����b ��P9 &T0 �; ��� r? Lb��5

1 . Olweus 2 . Whitney & Smith 3 . Coie & Dodge 4 . Farrington 5 . Middle school 6 . Perry, Willard & Perry 7 . Boulton & Smith 8 . Smith & Sharp 9 . Smith, Shu & Madsen

Page 4: jresearch.sanjesh.org · 30 / 03 / 95 : 07 / 08 / 95 Journal of Measurement & Educational Evaluation Studies ˘ ˇ ˆ˙ ˝ Vol. 6, No. 16, Winter 2017 89 -11 6+, 1395 %&’ 16 ˘

92 �%8��A �*��%8� � "#�> :8!& ������� ����/�3

J2,5 �94,5 r�) ����; ����b ��P9 &T0 �0 �; %��'3 �� �,�; %���g�0 �1

2001 �����b %�J;�J .(�;�'�� ��&'0 ������ 6�'5� ����; � ��� ��R �<�9 D��_� %�&�� � �J��0)2 2000.( �G?; �� '?�7� �; ;�C %:�'�0 �� ^�N9�� �; �<��

��8g�0�� V�� �&"�� %�"?�0 �;�� 6�'5� �&�J ���� �; �<�� .���������J �� L'���) ����; �J��� ����, %�&��; ;��9 %���g�03 0420.( ���b ;�� ���x ��

��&'��) ;�� +E"� �K��&R� �4 � !,�E&� �G��C�3 �&��E� ;��; ���&5� �%���g�04 2005.( !J �G&'?�� � X�58, � ;�?� �8g"� ���� �; F�� ���b ;����

�?�0) %���g�0 �5 2001 ^�N_�� ���� !J ����H9 �F�G�� >�?�3 ����H9 X��"�3 (�� XN�] � >�?�3 ��'3 d�x � %�G�Nx��� ��NJ�) ����»w�« 1393 %�G�Nx��� ��NJ� t

d�x ���'3»S« 1394 %���g�0 � L'��� t2001 t200410�23 .����; (�;�; %�"� �0 ��� J�� ����b � X?��R � U�R ���g0F� ����� �K��&R� �4 ��0��&�� U�P�� � ����9

Lg� �� �;�T&�� �P��0 ���9�J) ;��%���g�0 � ���6 2000t L'��� %���g�0 �2003 t>?�&'�?�� � >�9��7 2008 � �<�� ���b ;���� �� ����'� ����F�;�C � R�9 �� .(

�� ���3 X��; �&5��L'���) ���J %���g�0 �200110�23 ��5 >?� �� .( %�"� �0��&��; ����b�� � ��J L?��9 ���b ;���� J �0;�X?�4� ��0 ����; ��� 1E�

>?�&'�?�� � >�9��)2008;�&� ����� .( ��2?� ��_� � ���� %��; w�&E� ��0 ���� �K��&R� �� ����b �� J���kM� �;�J �����.��� �%���K ���� ��j� ��0 ��

��; � �G&T�����@� >�?�3 ���� :�� ���X��"C ���� �8g"� �x�N_�� ��0 �& �� %:�'�0 �T�� �8��9 � ���� � w�4 �<9 %�F���� ^�N9�� �; ����b �9:�� X

��'3 d�x � %�G�Nx��� ��NJ�)»D« 1393t h�x� � ��n3 �?�J8 2000F�?� t9 2000 t>0�J h���� >'�J %�'R �10 2004:�Q��J � �?�� %���� t11 2005� t � F����?

1 . Wolke et al 2 . Hawker & Boulton 3 . Nansel, Craig, Overpeck, Saluja & Ruan 4 . Veenstra, Lindenberg, Oldehinkel, De Winter, Verhulst & Ormel 5 . Haynie, Nansel, Eitel, Davis Crump, Saylor, Yu & Simmons-Morton 6 . Kaltiala-Heino, Rimpela, Rantanen & Rimpela 7 . Gutman & Feinstein 8 . Craig, Pepler & Atlas 9 . Welsh 10 . Kasen, Barenson, Cohen & Johson 11 . Brown, Birch & Kancherla

Page 5: jresearch.sanjesh.org · 30 / 03 / 95 : 07 / 08 / 95 Journal of Measurement & Educational Evaluation Studies ˘ ˇ ˆ˙ ˝ Vol. 6, No. 16, Winter 2017 89 -11 6+, 1395 %&’ 16 ˘

... ����� ������ ����� � �� �� ������� 93

��m��1 2007��&J��?�� t2 2009������J � ���J ���� ������ r��J t3 2009 t

������04 2009��?�� � 1?��0 6�R��� t5 2009.( 1��; � %���� >�� XNj� ����� >��Q�0B��� B�?q3 ���&5� %����� ���� ��0

1��; �; �� �<�� �� {�N��� ��� 1?�F�� %�������) �0;r? ��?���� �6 2002 � (1��;�� %�"� ;�C �� ����b ��&�� �&�J X�5 >?� �; %�����F9���� ���9�) ��0;7 2009��� � � t8 2009%���? t9 20109 .(O%:�'�0 ��k ����� F�� ����b W�4�� �;��� 1�J�� � �0��&�� ;�C �K��&R� �8��9 �; %����R�� � %�J;�J .X�� ��0

�� ��0�"� �� ;�C %:�'�0�� Lg� ;�C ��&�� � 6��� >?� �� � ���J � ;:) ��0;���9-%�;���10 2003� ���J t h��911 2006.( ����b ���� ��H� �; �� >?� ��

�� ����9�� ��) ;�� �?�"9 %:�'�0 �?�"9����� hJ�'?� �12 2005 ������� tF&3 � �n��0 >��R��13 2005�� >��Q�0 %:�'�0 .( �� �&?��5 �K��&R� ���� �����9

%�9�9) ���J ;�P?� %�� �����b 10�J ����14 2008 .(W��P��; �:�&�� %�77H� �;�J%:�'�0 X?��5 J ��� ��b X?�79 � %�� �����b �� ���G"�3 ����; 17�� �

>?������ .X��/�,�@� �� g�?� �� %:�'�0 �8��9 �� ��?�3�� r9��� �? ����s� !����� 10�23��0 w�&E� %�"� �;�; X�� J >?� ��� ��?�3�� �;�&'� � ������ .X�� ���x �� ��J R�9 � ����;� ;�R�� � ��"�3 �Jy ��� 0�23%��G"

�R��C ���x ��R � �8��9� � %:�'�0 >�� ����b ��� ���C � B����0 �4 ����b �; ���� �0 &C�;�3���. �; ��"J �� � L�; �&��J 10�23�0 � ;�N� ����F�

`���� ���� ���������� >?� ���� � �� R�9 � X��0� >?� W�4�� %��G"0�23 b�� ����; ��2?�%��� ��0?� �; %:�'�0 �8��9 ���"��3 �P�� B��F� � ����� �� %��

1 . Williams & Guerra 2 . Bayraktar 3 . Calık, Ozbay, Ozer, Kurt & Kandemir 4 . Hilooglu 5 . Varjas, Henrich & Meyers 6 . Bryk & Schneider 7 . Attar-Schwartz 8 . Lee & Wong 9 . Yaban 10 . Ladd & Troop-Gordon 11 . King & Terrance 12 . Salmivalli & Isaacs 13 . Salmivalli, Ojanen, Haanpaa & Peets 14 . Totan

Page 6: jresearch.sanjesh.org · 30 / 03 / 95 : 07 / 08 / 95 Journal of Measurement & Educational Evaluation Studies ˘ ˇ ˆ˙ ˝ Vol. 6, No. 16, Winter 2017 89 -11 6+, 1395 %&’ 16 ˘

94 �%8��A �*��%8� � "#�> :8!& ������� ����/�3

���J 1��; �; ���� >?� 1P�� ���� �����J ���F�� �� �����&� %��G"0�23 �?�� �9 %�����

.���N� ��<�

G�� �� � �T�,�9 �4�5 10�23 ��x.X�� �G&'N�0 ����� W�� >?� ����� ��R

10�23 �0 1��; ?�3 %����� �'3 !"� � !P�3 U��<s ��0 ���� ��0 �&�; �?��&�� ����H9 ��� �; J ��;�� %���� �<�1393 �; .��;�� L��H9 � ��i"� �<� >?� �;

;��� !P5 ���� U�: ���� L��H9 ����K � �����0 ���&C�� ����9 ��J ;�R� ����; �N?��)1 %���g�0 � 2006( ��� �!K� ����'� �� %��G"0�23 Lb��5 !P5 ���� U�:

��@�� >?� ���� 200 X�� %�'g?���0 � ���0)2 1987>?8J .(3 )2010F�� ( �7&�X�� �; L��H9 ����K ���"&J� ���� �0 ��i&� 10 �? 20 ���� U�: X�� ��� Lb��5 !P5 ���� 200 L��b W��; .X���; L��H9 ����K ?O9��� Lb��5 !P5 ���� �� ��6� L��K�0 >��9 ��;�� � �0��i&� .��� �� ������? �:;�� ���&C�� �;�T&�� ��; ;��5

20 ���� ���� �0 L��K )��i&� &T<� (U�: X�� %�'gR)4 2003 .(!P5 ���� �,�9 ��� ���� L��H9 L��K O9�?�� ;��5 200 ���� ���� �; L��K �,�9 ��� X�� ��)

>�&����� �5 2006 ( �� 10�23 >?� �; ��� ���� ���@� 6��� �� �q �� �;�T&�� ���� B�� ��C ��;��9 ������ !P5 ����600 .�� &��� �@� �; �T� B��

�����0 �� J ;�� ���, >?� � ���� � FJ�� ����) %���� �<� �?�����iR 7��� (D��R�; D�E&�� ���� �� ?�3 ���� �0 �; � �?��&�� !"� � !P�3 U��<s ��0

;�; I��3 10�23 ��0��F�� ��; .�� ���� J �9��, X��; 68J �; ?�3 �0 �� �� 68J r? ����, �� D�E&�� ��;��9.��

:8!& "���H*"#�>

1- �������!� �� ����� �������"�� :�(!)*6��7� >?� ���9����9F �

1 . Schreiber 2 . Holter & Hendriksen 3 . Kline 4 . Jackson 5 .shah & Goldstein

Page 7: jresearch.sanjesh.org · 30 / 03 / 95 : 07 / 08 / 95 Journal of Measurement & Educational Evaluation Studies ˘ ˇ ˆ˙ ˝ Vol. 6, No. 16, Winter 2017 89 -11 6+, 1395 %&’ 16 ˘

... ����� ������ ����� � �� �� ������� 95

>���0)2007�� &C�� ( � ����;22 !&?� X�� Q� ��) ����b L��K �; J �G?; ��0��&����� ��1��;) �����b � (!�J�� >� � �G?; %����� (����C ���� ��g� w�x 3 �?F�=F��0) �� ��0 = "��0 �92������ (�� ���� ?�� .��J�;�C �0 ��0 � 6��7�

�?� ���X���;�C . �����b 6��7�!&?���0 )1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 20 �22�;�C ( ����b 6��7�!&?���0 )2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 �21 F����9 .(

) >���0 �2007 �;�T&�� a�N���J ��T� `?�4 B�� �� ���"��3 ��N&K� >��9 ���� ( 6��7� LJ ���� �T� ̀ ?�4 J ��;�J %:�'�0 �8��990/0�;�C ���� �����b 6��7�

88/0 �;�C ���� � ����b 6��7�84/0 �X�; .���

2- :#���� �/��K� GH�,& ����L�#' ���F�� J �; >?� 10�23 �;�T&�� ��� X�� Lg� �8,� ��� 6��7� �9��0 )1981 1980 ( �%���K ��F�� 1P�� BF�G��

����H9 X�� . ��F�� >?�33 ?��;��; ������ �� ����H9 �F�G�� J�� ������ .��J�� �������q� >?� ���"��3 ����, w�x ��g� X�� >?�� ���, J 0��b�X

)���� 1( ����� )���� 2( �0�� ��b�� )���� 3( �jJ� ��b�� )���� 4 (� p�N?�79 "��0 )���� 5 .(��M� ����; ��F�� >?� >��Q�0��0 6�g�X����N&K� . >?� 6��7�

�� �;�T&�� �� B�� ��T� a�N���J 76/0 B��F� ��� X�� )��NJ� %�G�Nx��� � d�x��'3»;« 4139.(

#M G��

���@�� ���R� 10�23 ��&�� ���"��3 ���9 %��� �; +�E&� �'��G�� � ����� ����;���� �� hn� �R�9 %�;���� U�P�� �� .�8g"� ^���� � �R�9 ?���0

����� � d�� �� .�; ����� �9���7� ���"��3 �R�9 ��� �; ���&C� 20 �� �T�1��;���b %����� .X��� h3 �� d�R���� ���"��3 X����b �� ��F�� �� +E"� �0

������� � X�� ��;��C�� ������ J �'?����� �?����� ��;�� !<N� � �� F�;?r�9?> ���� �;������ ���� . ���"��3 �?�<� �; ���&C� 600 �T� �� 1��;%����� ���b �;�; .�� J X�� �Jy L��b23 ���"��3 �� ;��� W��P� �� ��K8x� %;�� +b�� L�; � �0�;�; � ���� &��q� ���J �0�<��;?X 577 ���"��3 L��H9�� . L��H9 ���R� >��Q�0

� ���"&J� ����KO9�?�� �;�; �� �FP� ���� �; ��� J ��� >?� � X��� ���, �0�� ;��9 ���"&J� ����K L��H9 ��300 ��;���� ����, � ���� D�E&�� ��;��9

Page 8: jresearch.sanjesh.org · 30 / 03 / 95 : 07 / 08 / 95 Journal of Measurement & Educational Evaluation Studies ˘ ˇ ˆ˙ ˝ Vol. 6, No. 16, Winter 2017 89 -11 6+, 1395 %&’ 16 ˘

96 �%8��A �*��%8� � "#�> :8!& ������� ����/�3

��� �� .��&��� ���b ���"&J� L��H9 ;���277 ���?O9 ����K L��H9 ������b�� ��;����

.X�� &��� ���,�<��;?X �;�; �� �;�T&�� �� �0U���0��F��� V19SPSS V8.80LISREL �Multilog L��H9 � ?FP9����.

�)3�(��

:�3�L)0 �/��6 1�/K� ���,��C >��9 ��@�� �%���P��� �"��3 >?� L��H9 �� �� TM� >��9 B�� � ���"&J� ����K 1�3 .�� �;�T&�� hJ��?��� 1C�s �� ��,� ��0

����K L��H9 ���R� �� X?�TJ +C�� ������;��� )KMO( X?��J %���� ���7� � N��H� X�9����� ���7� L��H9 >?� �; .KMO �� �����833/0 X?��J %���� ���7� � �� ����� X�9���793/1757 X�; � �;��� R�; �� J ���231 ���) ��;001/0 P≤ (

�R�9 L��b F�� ��� ;��� h?�9�� ?�3 �� ����K L��H9 ���R� �q .;��X�� ���� .��s �� %:�'�0 �8��9 6��7� g�?� >��9 +C�� X�� ��� W�N�� L��K��� ��0 B

���b R�9 ;��� ��g�� ��;��� � L��K �0 ���9 ��� >��N9 h��?��� XN'� �2?�6��� >?� �� .X��� &�� !0 ��� J �� S��E&�� L��K �;81/37 h��?��� �� �,�;

�� >��N9 �� %���� LJ ��� >��N9 h��?��� LJ ���R � ��g�� ��;��� ����� .���J�� %�"� �2?� B��� ����; ��F� ��� L��K J �0;74/5 X�� �07/26 �� �,�;

�� >��N9 �� LJ h��?�����J. �2?� B��� ����; U�; L��K %� �� ��8K58/2 X�� J74/11 �� >��N9 �� LJ h��?��� �� �,�; ���R �; .��J)1( ����K ��0�����M���0

���� �; %:�'�0 �8��9 6��7� ��0 �?��&�� .X�� ��� B��F�

Page 9: jresearch.sanjesh.org · 30 / 03 / 95 : 07 / 08 / 95 Journal of Measurement & Educational Evaluation Studies ˘ ˇ ˆ˙ ˝ Vol. 6, No. 16, Winter 2017 89 -11 6+, 1395 %&’ 16 ˘

... ����� ������ ����� � �� �� ������� 97

) P�!M1 �/��6 "����* (PQ�"�� ���!� �� ������ ������ ����� �(!)* "��)300=n( S)(A �(�>�� "�!/T �&�*#T 6 .;� !0��C ��, � ��4 ��� � !&T� �G?; %����� 1��; � 702/0 10 .U�� �� �G?; ��0 Q� �&5���� oK�� p���K >� 693/0 12 .U��q� �� �� !�� �G?; %����� 1��; ��� 685/0 21 Q� � >��� ��G� `������ � �� ���, � �0.!�J 652/0 8 %��G?; �9 !?�� �� %����� 1��; �� �g? ;��� �; ��0F�s

.����E� 642/0

4 1��;�� L0 �� �G?; %������� ���� �<�� � � !0;.!�� 608/0 16 %����� 1��;.!�� �� �G � !0; �� L0 �� �G?; 589/0 14 Q� ���� ���&�� �� �G?; ��0.!�J 560/0 2 1��;�� X?y� �� �G?; %�����.!�J 530/0 18 1��; � ��?� U��; ��� 6�'5��� >�0�9 �G?; %�����.!�J 469/0 15 1��;�� ��?;�� ��� p���K �G?; %�����.����� 713/0 11 Q��� �G �? ��4 >� � �G?; ��0.���� 700/0 9 1��;.���F� ��, >� � ����; ��b �G?; %����� 674/0 17 1��;�� !�&5���� oK�� �G?; %�����.���� 656/0 19 1��;�� >� � �G?; %�����.����C 557/0 22 1��;�� S��C� ���� �� p���K ��� �G?; %�����.���J 556/0 13 1��;�� X�; ��� �G?; %�����.������� 555/0 20 �� ��C �; ���� � >&�� �� LNb Q� ��?� !����&���� >� �� �0 ��

��.���J 544/0

3 1��;�� >� �� �?�0F�s %�������� >� J ����� �<�� � !0��C.!0��

515/0

1 1��;�� ?�� � ��� �G?; %�����.������� 377/0 7 ����� ���� �?�<�9 U;�C �?�T9 ��0.!�J 361/0 5 �� ��G� ls >� � �G?; ��0 Q�.���J 344/0

%��0 ��� �� ��0�"� J `���� ����K ��0��� �0 ;����&'0 .rs�J�9?> ���

� ��&� ����K��M� 5 ��344/0 ���F��9?> � ��&� ����K �����M� 15 ��713/0 X��.

Page 10: jresearch.sanjesh.org · 30 / 03 / 95 : 07 / 08 / 95 Journal of Measurement & Educational Evaluation Studies ˘ ˇ ˆ˙ ˝ Vol. 6, No. 16, Winter 2017 89 -11 6+, 1395 %&’ 16 ˘

98 �%8��A �*��%8� � "#�> :8!& ������� ����/�3

:"!�(V� �/��6 1�/K� ��� B���� ��@�� ����K�;� �� %:�'�0 �8��9 6��7�

+C�� .�� �;�T&�� ���?O9 ����K L��H9 B�� ���C h��?��� "?� �������� ��0`?�791 )RMSEA( h��?��� ;�����&�� "?� h3����� )SRMR(+C��

'?�7� ����������2 )CFI ( ��� U�� B���� +C��3 )NFI( �?�g�� +C��B����4 )GFI( ��� L?�9 B���� �?�g�� +C�� �5 )AGFI( 1P�� ����

+C�� ���� .�� �;�T&�� ��� ��������B�� �������� ��0 �;�&� ��0��� �� �� �&�J �? ���'� ���7� ��j� ���� .X�� ��� ���� %���E&�05/0 "?� ����

�? ���'� ���7� `?�79 ���C h��?��� �� �9:��96/0 �������� +C�� ���� '?�7� �� �&�J �? ���'� ���7� ��� U�� B���� � ��07/0 ;�����&�� "?� ����

h3 h��?���%�"� ����U����� � ��g���R) X�� ��� ���J �������� ���0;6 2003+C�� ��� J X�� ��� ;�<�"�3 �G?; /�x �� .( '?�7� �������� ��0 ��

�?�g�� ��� L?�9 B���� �?�g�� � B������F��9 ��9/0 +C�� � "?� ��0h3 h��?��� "?� � `?�79 ���C h��?��� �����rs�J�9 ��05/0 B���� �� ����

� D���� ���'�rs�J�9 ��1/0 ��J��) ;��; X:; D���� B���� ��1990 .(+C����? .�� ����� ���"��3 �?�<� U�� �������� ��0 &�������� �� �J�5 �0

�;�; D����- ;�� ��� . ��� >?� �;31/390=2X 208df= XN'� >?������ �88/1/df=2x X��.

1 . Root Mean Square Error of Approximation 2 . Comparative Fit Index 3 . Normed Fit Index 4 . Goodness of Fit Index 5 . Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index 6 . Joreskog & Sorbom

Page 11: jresearch.sanjesh.org · 30 / 03 / 95 : 07 / 08 / 95 Journal of Measurement & Educational Evaluation Studies ˘ ˇ ˆ˙ ˝ Vol. 6, No. 16, Winter 2017 89 -11 6+, 1395 %&’ 16 ˘

... ����� ������ ����� � �� �� ������� 99

) 1;%1(!% �&�*#T � "�!/T) ����� ������ ����� �(�$& P!� (

:�H* �(�� ���R� �� %:�'�0 �8��9 6��7� �?��� N��H� ����!0%��� �� %�

����H9 X��"�3 � ���� �� XN�] ^�N_�� ���� �9��0 ����H9 BF�G�� ���"��3��i&� .�� �;�T&�� ��� �Jy ��0 ���x !0%��� >�� �;600 1��; �� �T� %�����

���� ��0 %���� �?��&�� �G&'N�0 `?�4 �� �;�T&�� �� �,�5 ��K8x� � ��R� L��H9 %����3�� ���R)2.(

Page 12: jresearch.sanjesh.org · 30 / 03 / 95 : 07 / 08 / 95 Journal of Measurement & Educational Evaluation Studies ˘ ˇ ˆ˙ ˝ Vol. 6, No. 16, Winter 2017 89 -11 6+, 1395 %&’ 16 ˘

100 �%8��A �*��%8� � "#�> :8!& ������� ����/�3

) P�!M2���!� �� ����� ������ ����� �,)�-�� (:�#� � �(!)* "������� �* A "��

�/��K� W3#L�' � �/��K� :H�,& XY�-2& :#�& X���!� 8 W-�Z

#�[)� W3#L�'�/��K�

GH�,&�/��K�

8 W-�Z���!�

Y�-2& :#�&

6��7� �;�C����b

**209/0- **233/- 071/0 **278/-

6��7� �;�C�����b

**151/- **121/- **121/0 **134/-

LJ �8��9 **206/- **196/- **121/0 **231/-

%��0 ��� �� ��0�"� {�� ���R �; J �G&'N�0 %�F�� J ;�; %�"� V?�&� ;��) ���� �� XN�] � %:�'�0 �8��9 6��7� LJ ���� >��12/0 ��� �; (01/0p≤

��� ��;X�� . ����H9 �F�G�� � %:�'�0 �8��9 6��7� >�� L��H9 >?� �; >��Q�0)196/0- () ����H9 X��"�3206/0-) ^�N_�� ���� � (231/0-1��; ( ���� %�����

�� � �T��� ��� �; ���;01/0p≤ X�; � �;�C >�� %� �� ��8K .���6��7� ��0��i&� �� (����b � �����b) %:�'�0 �8��9 ��0��� ���� ��� �Jy ��0�"� ���;

�� ) ���R �; J2.X�� ��� ���� ( :��-)6 1�/K� ����; ���'�0 B�� �� �;�T&�� �� %:�'�0 �8��9 6��7� ��N&K�

��<� �� � .�� N��H� a�N���J ��T� `?�4 �� ����) ���R �;3 �; �T� `?�4 ( �0 �G&'N�0 � !&?� /q5 ���,��M� ��K LJ ���� �� ��� m��� ;�C � ^���� L

.X��

Page 13: jresearch.sanjesh.org · 30 / 03 / 95 : 07 / 08 / 95 Journal of Measurement & Educational Evaluation Studies ˘ ˇ ˆ˙ ˝ Vol. 6, No. 16, Winter 2017 89 -11 6+, 1395 %&’ 16 ˘

... ����� ������ ����� � �� �� ������� 101

) P�!M3 #� �,)�-�� (PQ� S)(A \]9 ���� �� �4�A ^(#_ � 10 :#�& �* "�!/T �&�*#T

!&?� ���� �� �G&'N�0

LJ ���� �� �4�A

\]9 :#�& �* �,)�-��

10 ���� �� �4�A

\]9 2 404/0 783/0 4 409/0 782/0 6 555/0 764/0 8 463/0 775/0 10 494/0 772/0 12 529/0 767/0 14 484/0 773/0 16 523/0 768/0 18 445/0 778/0 21 348/0 788/0 1 345/0 776/0 3 324/0 779/0 5 416/0 769/0 7 343/0 779/0 9 458/0 765/0 11 514/0 759/0 13 426/0 768/0 15 507/0 759/0 17 431/0 767/0 19 445/0 766/0 20 432/0 767/0 22 466/0 764/0 �T� 793/0 783/0

%:�'�0 �8��9 6��7� ��N&K� J ;�; %�"� V?�&�846/0 ��N&K� %� �� ��8K .X���;�C �� U��J �06��7� �����b �0783/0 ����b �793/0 X�; � .��� >��Q�0 �;

�G?; %�&����R >?� %���� LJ ���� �� ��M� �0 �G&'N�0 m��� ?�&� J X�� ��� V�� %�"��G&'N�0 �0 �0; �� �9:��) ��;�� `���� �03/0 .(%� �� %�F�� ) ���R �;3 (

Page 14: jresearch.sanjesh.org · 30 / 03 / 95 : 07 / 08 / 95 Journal of Measurement & Educational Evaluation Studies ˘ ˇ ˆ˙ ˝ Vol. 6, No. 16, Winter 2017 89 -11 6+, 1395 %&’ 16 ˘

102 �%8��A �*��%8� � "#�> :8!& ������� ����/�3

�0 ���� .X�� ��� m��� !&?� �0 /q5 ���, �; �T� `?�4�; ����b L��K �

�����b%��0 ��� �� ��0�"� J!&?� �� �g? /q5 ���, �; ;�� 10�J �T� %�F�� �0�����? >?������0��U��J ��M� ����0 ��3��M� K��P� �� ���"�0 "� &��q� ���J ��

.X�� �(#5& 1�/K�PQ�- P!� ��� #* `��'S��) ���MSamejima Model :( ��

I��3 �� %:�'�0 �8��9 6��7� �; J �P��0 N9� �� �������s �� w�x ����; �?F� � ��g���&'0 ��� `9�� ��7Nx ����; I��3 ��0!�� ��� �� ���� ���R

I��3 XN'� X'E� .X�� ��� �;�T&�� F�� ���������� �� L��H9 7Nx �0 ��0 ���I��3 d?��9�0 �; ;�; %�"� ��� ��0�"� ��0 XN'� I��3 7Nx ���� �7��� ��0

�0 �?����9 .;��; ;�R� L��H9��M� �&����3) ��2?� ��&���3 ���; �; ���� >�� F��9 �; �? F��9α( ��&�� � �?F� ��0) I��3 ��0β ���R) �� N��H� (4 �&�J F��9 �&����3 .(

��65/0 �%���K �3 F��9 +C��? >�65/0 �934/1 �%���K +C�� � ���&� F��935/1 �9:�� �? �%���K �g��) �� &��� �@� �; :�� F��9 +C����� � 6���� %1

2000.( � ����b) L��K �; �� %:�'�0 �8��9 6��7� J �?�P�� �� X�� �Jy L��b 7Nx I��3 ��H�� � %���� �0��� d��9 L��K �0 ���� �q X�� ��� L�g"9 (�����b

����, �����R X�� ��� m���.

1 . Baker, Rounds & Zevon

Page 15: jresearch.sanjesh.org · 30 / 03 / 95 : 07 / 08 / 95 Journal of Measurement & Educational Evaluation Studies ˘ ˇ ˆ˙ ˝ Vol. 6, No. 16, Winter 2017 89 -11 6+, 1395 %&’ 16 ˘

... ����� ������ ����� � �� �� ������� 103

) P�!M4`��' 1�/K� (����� ������ ����� PQ� "��

PQ���

H��� �&�)�AH>(����`��' "

α 1β 2β 1 77/0 77/0 29/0 2 72/0 20/1 86/3 3 57/0 55/0- 08/3 4 70/0 01/2 85/4 5 44/1 29/0 81/1 6 83/1 52/0 99/1 7 59/0 34/0 18/4 8 12/1 90/0 78/2 9 32/1 27/0 18/2 10 07/1 85/0 82/2 11 30/1 10/0 25/2 12 26/1 56/0 69/2 13 57/1 06/0- 77/1 14 54/1 65/0 32/2 15 12/1 13/0- 32/2 16 49/1 75/0 53/2 17 96/0 17/0- 62/2 18 34/1 50/0 96/1 19 25/1 03/0 05/2 20 33/1 69/0 09/2 21 53/0 64/1 65/5 22 03/1 21/0- 85/1

%��0 ��� ) ���R �; J4�� ��0�"� ( ;�� F��9 �&����3�&"�� ��M��0 `����X����M� �&"�� J ��� >?� � .��;�� D�C � ���&� F��9 �&����3 ����; �0t � ���

��M�3 7 �21 .��&��; ���?�3 F��9 `?�4 �q �?����M��0 `�� ��; ����&�t��& >�� �<�� F��9 �&����3 ��?�65/0 �935/1 ��&�� �&����3 .X����M��0 ��2?� �?;�7� ���;

�; XNj� �9 �T�� �?;�7� �� ������X���) 7Nx I��3 ��H�� .Category Response

Page 16: jresearch.sanjesh.org · 30 / 03 / 95 : 07 / 08 / 95 Journal of Measurement & Educational Evaluation Studies ˘ ˇ ˆ˙ ˝ Vol. 6, No. 16, Winter 2017 89 -11 6+, 1395 %&’ 16 ˘

104 �%8��A �*��%8� � "#�> :8!& ������� ����/�3

CurvesLg� �; () ��02 �3( X�� ��� B��F� .>��Q�0 ���� %���� �0��� d��9

������ %���� �0��� .X�� ��� N��H� ��2?� ��&���3 ����� �; 6��7� Xb; ���� �%���K ������ ���C hgK�� w?�9 ����;��t �?;�7� >?�������3�?>�9 C �0��� �� ��

>?�&"�� .X�� ����0 %���� �&"�� %���� �0����;�C ���� �����b 6��7���; �; �8/0- �92 +�;�C ���� � ���; �; ����b 6��7� 1/0+ �91/2 + X��; ���bLg�) ��04 �5.(

) 1;%2 ��-. `��' ��K�� (12 :�#� S)(A�&�*#T �����

) 1;%3 "#* ��8A ���>A a*�� (12 :�#� S)(A�&�*#T �����

Page 17: jresearch.sanjesh.org · 30 / 03 / 95 : 07 / 08 / 95 Journal of Measurement & Educational Evaluation Studies ˘ ˇ ˆ˙ ˝ Vol. 6, No. 16, Winter 2017 89 -11 6+, 1395 %&’ 16 ˘

... ����� ������ ����� � �� �� ������� 105

) 1;%4 ��-. `��' ��K�� (10 :�#� S)(A"�!/T �����

) 1;%5 ( "#* ��8A ���>A a*��10 :�#� S)(A"�!/T �����

� �)& � bK*"#�> �� %�&��; � %:�'�0!<��9?> ���� � %����R�� � %�J;�J %�� �K��&R� d����

�� �<�� .��?���� ����0 �� ��kO9 �G?�g? �� w�&E��� ��kO9 �G?�g? �� � ����q� .���?q3>?������ /�0 �� 10�23 �4�5 ������� 6��7� �8��9 %:�'�0 �; 1��;%�����

Page 18: jresearch.sanjesh.org · 30 / 03 / 95 : 07 / 08 / 95 Journal of Measurement & Educational Evaluation Studies ˘ ˇ ˆ˙ ˝ Vol. 6, No. 16, Winter 2017 89 -11 6+, 1395 %&’ 16 ˘

106 �%8��A �*��%8� � "#�> :8!& ������� ����/�3

;�� . >?� ���@�� ;��9 600 �T� �� 1��;%����� ���� ��0 �� %���� �<� �?��&��

�;�T&�� �� B�� �������� �5����s�� D�E&�� ���� . �0 �<�� ��0��F�� 10�23 �� L��g9 ��;�J .���� L��H9 �;�;�0 �� B����0 L��H9 ����K `?�4 ��T� N���Ja� �

�G&'N�0 %����3 �;�T&�� �� . � ��@�� >��9 ;��9 L���K g"9�L���0; �6��7 %:�'�0 �8��9 L��H9 ����K ���"&J� U�P�� �� .1�3 �� ���R� L��H9 ����K

4��T���0 %� ����� �� .���� S��E&�� L��K�0 �� L��H9 TM��0� ��,� &���;�T �� . &��?�0 J ;�; %�"� >?� ���"��3 X�� ��� L�g"9 �����b � ����b L��K �; ��.

V?�&� �� &��? >?� 10�23 F����9 � >���0 )2007( %:�'�0 �8��9 ���� J �� �; �������� ���?O9 ����K L��H9 %� �� ��8K .;�� �'�0 ��;�� Lm�b �� �����b � ����b

������K�;� .;�J ��?O9 �� &��? �0 %�"� ;�; J 22 ��M� �"��3 �� �J�5 �� {�N��� �� ��&C�� ����K ;��� �@� ;�� . ��T� B�� �� 6��7� >?� ��N&K� ����� ���� >��Q�0

`?�4 J ;�; %�"� V?�&� .�� �;�T&�� a�N���J ��T� a�N���J �4�?X1E� � X��>?� ��F�� �%���K ��F�� ���E"9 ���� ����� �����b � ����b �; ���� �0 �B����

.X�� ;�N<� �8��9 %:�'�0 �� ��H� ���@� W�� ^�N9�� !�� � 1��;���� %�g��q3?� X�� .>��Q�0 �� %:�'�0 �8��9 6��7� �?��� >��9 ��@�� � 10�23 >?� �;

���R�!0%��� � ^�N_�� ���� ���� �� XN�] �9��0 ����H9 �F�G�� ���"��3 �� %� 6��7� LJ ���� >�� �G&'N�0 %�F�� J ;�; %�"� V?�&� .�� �;�T&�� ����H9 X��"�3

���� �� XN�] � %:�'�0 �8��9 �� � XNj� ����� ���;X�; � >��Q�0 .�����H9 �F�G�� � %:�'�0 �8��9 6��7� >��^�N_�� ���� � ����H9 X��"�3 ��

1��;%����� �� � �T�� �����10�23 V?�&� �� J �� ��0�"� ��; ��NJ� ��0��'3 d�x � %�G�Nx���»�« 1394d�x � %�G�Nx��� ��NJ� t��'3»D« 1393 ��NJ� t

�K�� %�G�Nx��� �?�4� � ��1393t ���� � >���9 %�&��1 2008 v� ���� t ��� �2 2008 &��? .X�� �;�� �'�0 �G?; >?� ��� �; ;��� 6��7� ���;�3 �;�;��0

6��7� (%�� �����b � ����b) %:�'�0 �8��9 �; ?�@� ��M� - I��3 ;�� .����H ��2?� ��M��0 �; 6��7� %:�'�0 �8��9 �� ��H `?��4 F��9 � ��0�&����3 �� ��& ��M��0 �N��� �� ��� U�����R ;�� .�&"�� ��M��0 ����; `?��4 F��9 ���&� 9� :��

1. Boulton, Trueman & Murray.

2. Wong, Lok, Lo & Ma.

Page 19: jresearch.sanjesh.org · 30 / 03 / 95 : 07 / 08 / 95 Journal of Measurement & Educational Evaluation Studies ˘ ˇ ˆ˙ ˝ Vol. 6, No. 16, Winter 2017 89 -11 6+, 1395 %&’ 16 ˘

... ����� ������ ����� � �� �� ������� 107

��;�� � ��0�&����3 ��&�� ���; �T�� �9 XNj� �� �;������&��� .d��9 �0��� %���� F�� %�"� ;�; J 6��7� %:�'�0 �8��9 �; ��&���3 ��2?� �0��� �N���� � �;X

�� &��? >��N9 ���� .�0;�� �0 XT� %��9���� �; �����b �4�5 ��5 �; J "��g� %��� ���� �; !<� � ���<R V?�&� .X�� ��� ���� �K��&R� X�8� � �����

10�23 ����b J ;�; %�"� �0�� �; ^�N_�� � !@� � BF�G�� ����H9 X��"�3���� �0 � .;��; ����� ���� �; ����b J ��� >? �0 �F�G�� U�K � 10�J oK��

��1��; X��"�3 ���� %����� %���g�0 � X�0) ;��2007 ����b �G?; ��� �� .(���� �; ^�N_�� � !@� J X�� ����K �0 �� �?�<9 ����J ;�R� � S�� � S�0

��1��; ���� � XN�] oK�� � ;����� L��H9 � ���� �� %�����h�n?��g��) ;��1 2008( t>?������ /�,�@� �� g�?� �� ����b �� ��?�3�� r9 ����K �? ���K��s� � !����

10�23��0 w�&E� %�"� �;�; X�� J >?� ��� ��?�3�� �;�&'� � ������ X��t � ��H� J V?�&� 10�23�0 �; ��0��"J w�&E� %�"� ;�; >�� 40 �9 45 �,�; ��

%�J;�J �; z�� ����b �? �����b %�� ���b >'��J�R � �������) ����;2 2009 .(X��"C �� %�� �����b �?�� �� �� �;��5 �9 J ��� %���K d���R �; V?�� ��0

1��; �"J;�C�'� � ��� &'N�0 %����� �FK � �?�<�9 ����� ����; �8g"� �� ���1�3 �� >�?�3 hT��� ���� .��J >?������%����R�� �� !<��9?> ���"b� &'0�� J �� >?�

��� R��� ��&'0t ���x� J D��P9 � 10�23��0 %���&C���� %�"� �� �0; ;��9 �;�?� �� �<�� ����; �8g"� ����� Lj� �����b %�� � �; z�� X��"C ���b ���>&

d�x � %�G�Nx��� ��NJ�) ��&'0 ��'31395.( >?� ;�N� X?;��H� �� ��C F�� 10�23t >�&'E� X?;��H� ��� �4�5 %� X�� +E"� X'�� ������0 L,�5 �� >?� ����F

�9 s ������ �� ��0��&�� �b�� �; ����� ������ �N9�� X��t X?;��H� U�; >?� ��� %� X�� J ��0��� ���� X���'5 ������0 %� XN'� � �8C��� ������- ����� v���9 ��"� ��?; X�� .+E"� X'�� J �?� �������� X�; � ��0 �� >?� ��F�� XN'� � �8C��� �4 �����b � ����b X���'5 U�: �� ����; �? �t ;��H�X? U�� >?� ��F�� ^���� � ����b ���g� � ����� ��� X�� . �;>?� 10�23 1��;�%����

%�&��<� %���� ��� ������ � �?�� &��?��0 %� �� �?�� � ^��&5� �� ��0�<� ��"J

1. Skrzypiec. 2. Fleming & Jakobsen.

Page 20: jresearch.sanjesh.org · 30 / 03 / 95 : 07 / 08 / 95 Journal of Measurement & Educational Evaluation Studies ˘ ˇ ˆ˙ ˝ Vol. 6, No. 16, Winter 2017 89 -11 6+, 1395 %&’ 16 ˘

108 �%8��A �*��%8� � "#�> :8!& ������� ����/�3

!��9 ;�; . TM� >��9 B�� �� �;�T&�� >��Q�0 ����K L��H9 X�'b �; ��,� ��0

�� ���"&J�X?;��H� �� ����9 .���� 10�23 >?� ��06��� �� >?� X?;��H� �0 ;�<�"�3 ��;�� ������0 %�� �����b � ����b �� ��������0 ��&�� �b�� �; ����� ������ &'N�0 ;�� �9 ��0��� �� �'� ������0 L,�5 �� +�E"9 >?� ��F�� �;

X�b����0 �b�� ����� !0��� ;�� .�� >? ��� J ���0 +E"� X'�� J �?� ������0 :�� �; >?� ���"��3 %��9 1�3���� ��0��&�� %�� �����b � ����b K��� �� ;��; �? ���C >��Q�0 � %��G"0�23 ;�<�"�3 ��;�� J �; ���?� �9���� �� ��x�F?� ���J J >�4 +�E"9 ������0 B�� ��b; >?� ��F�� ���� +�E"9 ������0 �����b � ���b ��0;����J ���K ������0 >?� ��F�� �� �; 1�3���� &����0��

�b�� �; ��H� ����� ;�� +�E"9 ��0; .����� �?��� ������0 ���� X�; � �� >?� ��F�� �%���K ���F�� ���� +�E"9 X���'5 �k� �8C��� �����; ������9 ���H

��G?; �� 10�23��0 `���� �; ;��� >?� ��F�� ���� .B�� �?�� �� �;�T&�� �?�� �� �0 TM� B�� p���, �)�� ;�<�"�3 ���"&J� ����K L��H9 �; (��,� ��0�0 .;��>��Q

;�<�"�3 ��;�� ���� (%�� �����b � ����b) %:�'�0 �8��9 �; ���� �0 �� ��0��i&� w�&E� X�8� ����� ��79�� X�8� X���<� ����� �K��&R� X?��5

�"J;�C ��g�� ���P�0 B�0 ���0 ��� v��;� �?�<�9 6�'5� ���J;�� � ...����� ;�� �9 1��; ��P'�� ���C�; �8��9 %:�'�0 �; ���� �0 � �����

>?� ���� �� �?�� �����0 J ��bX�� ��&"�� �; ������F?���0 x���� ;��; 5L,� ;�� .�G?; �g? %� �� %�F�� �� ��0;����J >?� ��,� ��F�� ���� ����� ���k� ���H

�K��&R� �� X��"�3 ����H9 X�� .�<��;?X �� R�9 � X�<� ��R� �<�X ���� ���q� X�<� ��N9 � ��'T9 X����b ��R� ����, �;�� � �0��� K��� %;��

� �?��� � ��N&K� `���� P�&� &��� ��;�� J 6��7� %:�'�0 �8��9 ����F �N���� ���� ���������� 1��; �K��&R� �����%����� X��. �� R�9 � ���N� ��@� ;�R�� �

10�23��0 &�q� ;�<�"�3 ��;�� ������0 %:�'�0 �8��9 �� ��������0 ��&�� �b�� �; ����� ������ &'N�0 ;�� �9 ��0��� �� �'� ������0 L,�5 �� +�E"9

>?� ��F�� �; X�b����0 �b�� ����� !0��� ;�� . ���x ��J V?�&� 10�23 4�5� %�"� ;�; J E'� ����� ���"��3 �8��9 %:�'�0 �; ��R 1��;����?� %�����

�� ���,��C %����P�� L��b ��Nb ��;��C�� X�� � �� %��G"0�23�����9 �� %� �%���K ���F�� �N&� 10�23 �; ��0%���&C���� �;�T&�� ���J . ���� >?��

Page 21: jresearch.sanjesh.org · 30 / 03 / 95 : 07 / 08 / 95 Journal of Measurement & Educational Evaluation Studies ˘ ˇ ˆ˙ ˝ Vol. 6, No. 16, Winter 2017 89 -11 6+, 1395 %&’ 16 ˘

... ����� ������ ����� � �� �� ������� 109

�� %��G"0�23 �0 1��; � %�����X�;%���J���� �<� � %�&�� B���3 � B���� %�&�

�� �g"9 � �?�79 %�������J.

Page 22: jresearch.sanjesh.org · 30 / 03 / 95 : 07 / 08 / 95 Journal of Measurement & Educational Evaluation Studies ˘ ˇ ˆ˙ ˝ Vol. 6, No. 16, Winter 2017 89 -11 6+, 1395 %&’ 16 ˘

110 �%8��A �*��%8� � "#�> :8!& ������� ����/�3

a*���

��NJ� %�G�Nx��� L_�� � d�x ��'3 B����»w�« )1393 .(��2?���0 %���P��� 6��7� ����b �9��0 �; 6���� �?��&�� %���� . �P� ��g"��; X���<� � �&'���&

��7�7H9 �&���<� 12 )4 (13 – 27. ��NJ� %�G�Nx��� � L_�� d�x ��'3 B����»w�« )1394 .( '?�7� W��� ����b �;

1��;%����� �&C; � �'36���� ���&� �<� !b .>��� 1?��0 ��� �����;��� � ��79�� X�8� 14 ��� %��� 1394 51-147.

��NJ� %�G�Nx��� L_�� � d�x ��'3 B����»D« )1393 .(������� 6��7� ��G��C�3 )����b � !"C (�; 6���� �?��&�� %���� . ������ 10�23��0 %��������

�K��&R� 4 )16( 73 – 88. d�x � L_�� %�G�Nx��� ��NJ�B���� ��'3»D« )1394��2?� � ����K ��&C�� .( ��0

%���P��� ) ����b W��� ���"��3BPQ . ���&� 6���� �; ( � B���� �P� (%���0 �g�F3 U��K ��G"��;) ��R X�8� 2 )2 (10 – 19.

��NJ� %�G�Nx��� L_�� � d�x ��'3 B����»S« )1394 .(17� ����b � �����b %�� �; 1�3���� X��"�3 ����H9 1��;%����� 6���� �?��&�� �<� %����. >���

1?��0 ��� �����;��� � ��79�� X�8� 14 ��� %��� 1394 97-292. ��NJ� %�G�Nx��� L_�� � d�x ��'3 B����»;« )1394 .(������� 6��7� ����b

��?���� �; 1��;%����� �?��&�� �<� %���� . �P� ��,� X���<� ����� 17 )4( 178 -185.

��NJ� %�G�Nx��� L_�� � d�x ��'3 B����»�« )1394 .(��2?���0 %���P��� 6��7� �����b �; 6���� �?��&�� �<� %���� . ?�"� ��G"��; U��K �g�F3 ��<� ��&"<

)���0�23( 20 )3( 163 – 170. d�x � L_�� %�G�Nx��� ��NJ�) B���� ��'31395 ���,��C .(%���P���

1��; �; �����s �����b ���"��3 .%���� �<� �?��&�� 6���� %����� �P�(1��J) %���� �g�F3 U��K ��G"��; 17 )3 (660 – 668.

��NJ� %�G�Nx��� tL_�� �T@K�� ������ � �?�4� ��K��H� )1393 .(��2?���0 %���P��� 6��7� ��&�� �K��&R� v;�J . �P� U��K ���&�� 8 )4( 339 – 345.

Attar-Schwartz, S. (2009). Peer sexual harassment victimization at school: The roles of student characteristics, cultural

Page 23: jresearch.sanjesh.org · 30 / 03 / 95 : 07 / 08 / 95 Journal of Measurement & Educational Evaluation Studies ˘ ˇ ˆ˙ ˝ Vol. 6, No. 16, Winter 2017 89 -11 6+, 1395 %&’ 16 ˘

... ����� ������ ����� � �� �� ������� 111

affiliation, and school factors. American Journal of Orthopsy-chiatry, 79 (3), 407-20.

Baker, J. G.; Rounds, J. B. & Zevon M.A.A (2000). Comparison of Graded Response and Rasch Partial Credit Models with Subjective Well-being. Journal Educational behavior stat. 25 (3), 253-70.

Bayraktar, F. (2009). Ergenlerin zorba ve kurban davranışların-da birey, aile, akran ve okula dair özelliklerin rolü: Bütüncül bir model önerisi. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.

Bee, H. & Boyd, D. (2007). The developing child. Boston: Pear-son International Edition.

Berkler, S. J. (1990). Applications of covariance structure modeling in psychology: cause for concern. Psychological Bull, 107, 260-73.

Boulton, M. J. & Smith, P.K. (1994). Bully/victim problems in middle school children: Stability, self-perceived competence, peer perceptions, and peer acceptance. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 315-29.

Boulton, M. J.; Trueman, M. & Murray, L. (2008). Associations between peer victimization fear of future victimization and disrupted concentration on class work among junior school pupils. British Journal Education Psychology. 78, 473-89.

Brown, S. L.; Birch, D. A. & Kancherla, V. (2005). Bullying perspectives: Experiences, attitudes, and recommendations of 9- to 13-year-olds attending health education centers in the United States. Journal of School Health, 75 (10), 384-92.

Bryk, A. & Schneider, S. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resour-ce for improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Bukowki, W. M.; Sippola, L. A. & Newcomb, A.F. (2000). Variations in patterns of attraction to same-and other-sex peers during early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 36, 147-54.

Çalık, T.; Özbay, Y.; Özer, A.; Kurt, T. & Kandemir, M. (2009). İlköğretim okulu öğrencilerinin zorbalık statülerinin okul iklimi, prososyal davranışlar, temel ihtiyaçlar ve cinsiyet değişkenlerine göre incelenmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 60, 555-76.

Coie, J. D. & Dodge, K. A. (1998). Aggression and antisocial behavior. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 779-862). New York: Wiley.

Page 24: jresearch.sanjesh.org · 30 / 03 / 95 : 07 / 08 / 95 Journal of Measurement & Educational Evaluation Studies ˘ ˇ ˆ˙ ˝ Vol. 6, No. 16, Winter 2017 89 -11 6+, 1395 %&’ 16 ˘

112 �%8��A �*��%8� � "#�> :8!& ������� ����/�3

Connolly, J.; Goldberg, A.; Pepler, D. & Craig, W. M. (1999).

Development and significance of cross-sex activities in early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24, 123-30.

Craig, W. M.; Pepler, D. & Atlas, R. (2000). Observations of bullying in the playground and in the classroom. School Psychology International, 21 (1), 22-36.

Eccles, J. S. & Roeser, R.W. (2005). School and community influences on human development. In M. H. Bornstein & M. H. Lamb (Eds.), Developmental science: An advanced textbook (pp. 513-555). New Jersey, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.

Farrington, D. P. (1993). Understanding and preventing bullying. In M. Tonry (ed.), Crime and Justice, 17 (pp. 381-458). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Graham, S. & Juvonen, J. (1998). A social cognitive perspective on peer aggression and victimization. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development (pp. 23-70). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Gutman, L. M. & Feinstein, L. (2008). Children’s Well-being in Primary School: Pupil and School Effects. Technical Paper 24, Wider Benefits of Learning Research Report. London: Department for Children, Schools, and Families.

Hawker, D. & Boulton, M. (2000). Twenty years’ research on peer victimization and psychosocial adjustment: A meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 441-55.

Hawley, P. H. (1999). The ontogenesis of social dominance: A strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review, 19, 97-132.

Haynie, D. L.; Nansel, T.; Eitel, P.; Davis Crump, A.; Saylor, K.; Yu, K. & Simmons-Morton, B. (2001). Bullies, victims, and bully/victims: Distinct groups of youth at risk. Journal of Early Adolescence, 21, 29-49.

Hilooğlu, S. (2009). Ilkögretim ikıncı kademe ogrencılerının zorbaca davranışlarını yordamada sosyal becerı ve yaşam do-yumunun rolu. Yayınlanmamış yuksek lisans tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi, Adana.

Holter, P. & Hendriksen, N. B. (1987). Field method for measuring respiratory loss and bulk export of organic matter from cattle dung pats. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 19 (5): 649-50.

Page 25: jresearch.sanjesh.org · 30 / 03 / 95 : 07 / 08 / 95 Journal of Measurement & Educational Evaluation Studies ˘ ˇ ˆ˙ ˝ Vol. 6, No. 16, Winter 2017 89 -11 6+, 1395 %&’ 16 ˘

... ����� ������ ����� � �� �� ������� 113

Jackson, D. L. (2003). Revisiting sample size and number of

parameter estimates: Some support for the N: q hypothesis. Structural equation modeling. 10 (1): 128- 141.

Joreskog, K. G. & Sorbom D. (2003). LISREL 8: User's Reference Guide. Chicago: Scientific Software Inc.

Kaltiala-Heino, R.; Rimpela, M.; Rantanen, P. & Rimpela, A. (2000). Bullying at school: An indicator of adolescents at risk for mental disorders. Journal of Adolescence, 23, 661-74.

Kasen, S.; Berenson, K.; Cohen, P. & Johnson, J. G. (2004). The effects of school climate on changes in aggressive and other behaviors related to bullying. In D. L. Espelage & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention (pp. 187-210). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

King, A. R. & Terrance, C. (2006). Relationships between per-sonality disorder attributes and friendship qualities among college students. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 23 (5), 5-20.

Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd edn Guilford Press. New York. USA. ISBN, 1965705777. 2010.

Kowalski, R. M. & Limber, S. P. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescents Health, 4, 22-30.

Kumpulainen, K.; Rasanen, E.; Henttonen, I.; Almqvist, F.; Kresanov, K. & Linna, S. L. (1998). Bullying and psychiatric symptoms among elementary school age children. Child Abuse & Neglect, 22, 705-17.

Ladd, G.W. & Troop-Gordon, W. (2003). The role of chronic peer difficulties in the development of children’s psychological adjustment problems. Child Development, 74 (5), 1344-67.

Lee, S. S. & Wong, T. S. (2009). School, parents, and peer fac-tors in relation to Hong Kong students’ bullying. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 15, 217-33.

Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescent-limited and life-course-persistent anti-social behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674-701.

Nansel, T.; Overpeck, M.; Haynie, D.; Ruan, J. & Scheidt, P. C. (2003). Relationships between bullying and violence among U.S. youth. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine, 157, 348-53.

Page 26: jresearch.sanjesh.org · 30 / 03 / 95 : 07 / 08 / 95 Journal of Measurement & Educational Evaluation Studies ˘ ˇ ˆ˙ ˝ Vol. 6, No. 16, Winter 2017 89 -11 6+, 1395 %&’ 16 ˘

114 �%8��A �*��%8� � "#�> :8!& ������� ����/�3

Nansel, T.; Overpeck, M.; Haynie, D.; Ruan, J. & Scheidt, P. C.

(2003). Relationships between bullying and violence among U.S. youth. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine, 157, 348-53.

Nansel, T. R.; Craig, W.; Overpeck, M. D.; Saluja, G.; Ruan, W. J. (2004). Crossnational consistency in the relationship between bullying behaviors and psychosocial adjustment. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 158, 730-36.

Nansel, T. R.; Overpeck, M.; Pilla, R. S.; Ruan, W. J.; Simons-Morton, B. & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying behaviors among US youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2094-2100.

Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying in Schools: What We Know and What We Can Do. Oxford: Blackwell.

Olweus, D. (1999). Norway. In P. K. Smith, Y. Morita, J. Junger-Tas, D. Olweus, R. Catalano., & P. Slee (eds), The Nature of School Bullying: A Cross-national Perspective (pp. 28-48). London: Rutledge.

Pellegrini, A. D. & Bartini, M. (2001). Dominance in early adolescent boys: Affinitive and aggressive dimensions and possible functions. Merrill–Palmer Quarterly, 47, 142-63.

Pellegrini, A. D.; Bartini, M. & Brooks, F. (1999). School bullies, victims, and aggressive victims: Factors relating top group affiliation and victimization in early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 216-24.

Perry, D. G.; Willard, J.; Perry, L. (1990). Peers’ perceptions of consequences that victimized children provide aggressors. Child Development, 61, 1289-309.

Petry, K.; Maes, B. & Vlaskamp, C. (2005). Domains of quality of life of people with rofound multiple disabilities: The perspective of parents and direct support staff. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 18, 35-46.

Rubin, K. H.; Chen, X.; Coplan, R.; Buskirk, A. A. & Wojsla-wowics, J. C. (2005). Peer relationships in childhood. In M. H. Bornstein & M. H. Lamb (Eds.), Developmental science: An advanced textbook (pp. 513-555). New Jersey, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.

Salmivalli, C. & Isaacs, J. (2005). Prospective relations among victimization, rejection, friendlessness, and children’s self and peer-perceptions. Child Development, 76 (6), 1161-1171.

Page 27: jresearch.sanjesh.org · 30 / 03 / 95 : 07 / 08 / 95 Journal of Measurement & Educational Evaluation Studies ˘ ˇ ˆ˙ ˝ Vol. 6, No. 16, Winter 2017 89 -11 6+, 1395 %&’ 16 ˘

... ����� ������ ����� � �� �� ������� 115

Salmivalli, C.; Ojanen, T.; Haanpää, J. & Peets, K. (2005). “I’m

OK but you’re not” and other peer-relational schemas: Explai-ning individual differences in children’s social goals. Developmental Psychology, 41 (2), 363-75.

Schreiber, J. B.; Nora, A.; Stage, F. K.; Barlow, E. A. & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of educational research. 99 (6), 323-38.

Schwartz, D.; Dodge, K. A. & Coie, J.D. (1993). The emergence of chronic peer victimization. Child Development, 64, 1755-1772.

Shah, R. & Goldstein, S. M. (2006). Use of structural equation modeling in operations management research: Looking back and forward. Journal of Operations Management. 24 (2), 148-69.

Smith, P. K. & Sharp, S. (1994). The problem of school bullying. In P. K. Smith &S. Sharp (Eds.), School bullying (pp. 1-19). London: Rutledge.

Smith, P. K.; Shu, S. & Madsen, K. (2001). Characteristics of victims of school bullying: Developmental changes in coping strategies and skills. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 332-352). New York: Guilford.

Tarshis, T. P. & Huffman, L. C. (2007). Psychometric properties of the Peer Interactions in Primary School (PIPS) questionnaire. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 28, 125-32.

Totan, T. (2008). Ergenlerde zorbalığın Anne baba ve akran iliş-kileri açısından incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Bolu.

Varjas, K.; Henrich, C. & Meyers, J. (2009). Urban middle school students’ perceptions of bullying, cyberbullying and school safety. Journal of School Violence, 8, 159-76.

Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Oldehinkel, A.J., De Winter, A.F., Verhulst, F. C. & Ormel, J. (2005). Bullying and victimization in elementary schools: A comparison of bullies, victims, bully/victims, and uninvolved preadolescents. Developmental Psychology, 41, 672-82.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Page 28: jresearch.sanjesh.org · 30 / 03 / 95 : 07 / 08 / 95 Journal of Measurement & Educational Evaluation Studies ˘ ˇ ˆ˙ ˝ Vol. 6, No. 16, Winter 2017 89 -11 6+, 1395 %&’ 16 ˘

116 �%8��A �*��%8� � "#�> :8!& ������� ����/�3

Welsh, W. N. (2000). The effects of school climate on school

disorder. The Annals of the American Acedemy of Political and Social Science, 567, 88-107.

Whitney, I. & Smith, P. K. (1993). A survey of the nature and extent of bullying in junior/middle and secondary schools. Educational Research, 35, 3-25.

Williams, K. & Guerra, N. G. (2007). Prevalence and predictors of internet bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 14-21.

Wolke, D.; Woods, S.; Stanford, K. & Schulz, H. (2001). Bullying and victimization of primary school children in England and Germany: Prevalence and school factors. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 673-96.

Wong, D. S. W.; Lok, D. P. P.; Lo, T. W. & Ma, S. K. (2008). School bullying among Hong Kong Chinese primary schoolchildren. Youth and Society, 40 (1), 35-54.

Yaban, E. H. (2010). Ergenlerin arkadaşlık niteligi, ebeveynden ve okul ortamında ogretmenden algılanan destek ile akran zorbalıgı/zorbalıga maruz kalma arasındaki ilişkiler. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.