3 PL and 4 PL

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/8/2019 3 PL and 4 PL

    1/30

    1

    3 PL and 4 PL

  • 8/8/2019 3 PL and 4 PL

    2/30

  • 8/8/2019 3 PL and 4 PL

    3/30

    33

    Supply Chain relationships may vary from one another based on:

    Duration

    Obligations

    Expectations

    Interaction / Communication

    Cooperation

    Planning

    Goals

    Benefits and burdens

    RELATIONSHIPS

  • 8/8/2019 3 PL and 4 PL

    4/30

    4

    Arms length Strategic

    Vendor Strategic Alliance

    LOGISTICS RELATIONSHIP SPECTRUM

  • 8/8/2019 3 PL and 4 PL

    5/30

    55

    The relationship with a vendor is transactional and parties to a

    vendor relationship are said to be at arms length.

    A

    vendor is seen simply as a provider of a product of service, suchthat there is little or no integration or collaboration with the buyer

    or purchaser.

    There are certain types of transactions for which this option is

    desirable.

    One-time or even multiple purchases of standard products or

    services is appropriate for an arms length relationship.

    CHARACTERISTICS OF VENDOR RELATIONSHIPS

  • 8/8/2019 3 PL and 4 PL

    6/30

    66

    Strategic alliance is one in which two or more business

    organizations work together and developlong-term goals and

    business objectives jointly.This form of relationship typically benefits the parties by reducing

    uncertainty, improving communication, increasing loyalty and help

    to enhance the overallperformance.

    The challenges in this relationship is that it requires heavy resource

    commitments by the participating organizations, significant

    opportunity costs and high switching costs.

    CHARACTERISTICS OF STRATEGIC ALLIANCE

  • 8/8/2019 3 PL and 4 PL

    7/30

    77

    3 PL of third-partylogistics is simply the use of an outside

    company to perform all or most of the firms materials management

    and product distribution functions. Recently there have been significant increases in the number of

    firms offering 3 PL services.

    Examples of 3 PL companies include Fedex, UPS, DHL, Exel, Intral

    Corporation, Kuehne & Nagel, etc

    THIRD PARTY LOGISTICS OR 3 PL

  • 8/8/2019 3 PL and 4 PL

    8/30

    88

    Transportation Based

    Included among transportation based 3 PLs are Ryder, Menio,

    Fedex, UPS, Schneider Logistics etc.

    These companies primarily started as a transportation

    companies and have expanded to other areas of logistics.

    TYPE OF 3 PL PROVIDERS

    Warehouse / Distribution Based

    Examples of such firms include DSC Logistics, USCO and Exel.Traditionally, most warehouse / distribution based logistics

    suppliers have been in the warehousing business and have

    expanded into a broader range of services.

  • 8/8/2019 3 PL and 4 PL

    9/30

    99

    TYPE OF 3 PL PROVIDERSWarehouse / Distribution Based

    These firms have found the transition to integrated services to be

    less complex and less difficult than the transportation providers as

    they were already involved in inventory management,

    warehousing, distribution etc.

    Forwarder / Shipping Line Based

    This category include companies such as Kuehne & Nagel, Fritz,Hub Group that have extended their roles as forwarders to 3 PL

    services.

    They are the most preferred 3 PLs for companies involved

    extensively in exports and imports

  • 8/8/2019 3 PL and 4 PL

    10/30

    1010

    TYPE OF 3 PL PROVIDERSWarehouse / Distribution Based

    These firms have found the transition to integrated services to be

    less complex and less difficult than the transportation providers as

    they were already involved in inventory management,

    warehousing, distribution etc.

    Forwarder / Shipping Line Based

    This category include companies such as Kuehne & Nagel, Fritz,Hub Group that have extended their roles as forwarders to 3 PL

    services.

    They are the most preferred 3 PLs for companies involved

    extensively in exports and imports

  • 8/8/2019 3 PL and 4 PL

    11/30

    1111

    TYPE OF 3 PL PROVIDERS Financial Based

    This category includes firms such as Cass Information Systems,

    CTC (CommercialTraffic Corporation). FleetBoston Financial

    Corporation.These firms traditionalprovided services like, freight payment

    and auditing, cost accounting and control etc.

  • 8/8/2019 3 PL and 4 PL

    12/30

  • 8/8/2019 3 PL and 4 PL

    13/30

    13

    71% 73% 71%68%

    73%

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%

    2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

    Outsourced to 3 PL

    Not outsourced to 3PL

    3 PL USERS AND NON-USERS

    Source: C. John Langley Jr.,Gary R. Allen and Gene R. Tyndall, Third-party-Logistics

    Services

    Level of 3 PL outsourcing has been steady at about 70-72%

  • 8/8/2019 3 PL and 4 PL

    14/30

    14

    SHIPPERS USING MORE THAN 10 3 PLS

    Big companies typically outsource to multiple 3 PLsbased on locations

    Shippers No. of 3 PLs Used

    General Motors 25

    Ford 19

    Wal-Mart 15

    HP 14

    DuPont 14

    Chrysler 11

    GE 10

    Source: Armstrong & Associates,Inc.

  • 8/8/2019 3 PL and 4 PL

    15/30

  • 8/8/2019 3 PL and 4 PL

    16/30

    16

    NON-USER RESPONDENTS: RATIONALE FOR NOT USING 3 PLSERVICES

    63%

    63%

    48%

    44%

    44%

    0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

    Control would diminish

    Costs would not be reduced

    Service Commitments would not

    be met

    Logistics is a core activity

    We have expertise

  • 8/8/2019 3 PL and 4 PL

    17/30

    17

    SOURCE OF SCM TECHNOLOGY

    Companies rely heavily on technology provider to obtainSCM technologies and not too much on 3 PLs

    20%

    69%

    11%

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    3 Technology

    ovi e

    In e nal

    Source: C. John Langley Jr.,Gary R. Allen and Gene R. Tyndall, Third-party-LogisticsServices

  • 8/8/2019 3 PL and 4 PL

    18/30

    18

    Involvement in Outsourcing : Who is responsible for implementation?

    15

    49

    139

    37

    13

    60

    0 50 100 150

    P e i e / EO

    Fi a ce

    S M

    Ma ufac u i g

    Ma ke i g

    I fo a io

    Sy e

    Nu e of Re o e

    Implementation of 3 PL relationship is predominantly doneby SCM and IT team is also involved to a large extent.

  • 8/8/2019 3 PL and 4 PL

    19/30

    19

    QUANTIFIABLE MEASURES OF 3 PL SUCCESS

    SCM costs reduced by 8.2 %

    SCM assets reduced by 15.6%

    Average Order Cycle length reduced by 25%Overall inventories reduced by 6%

    Source: C. John Langley Jr.,Gary R. Allen and Gene R. Tyndall, Third-party-LogisticsServices

  • 8/8/2019 3 PL and 4 PL

    20/30

    20

    REPORTED PROBLEM AREAS OF 3 PL OUTSOURCING

    Service level commitments have not been realized

    Strategic management skills are lacking

    Cost reductions have not been realizedPrice increases occur once relationship has commenced

    Control over the outsourced function has diminished

    Consultative, knowledge-based skills are lacking in 3 PLs

    Time and effort spent on SCM activities have not been reduced.

    Source: C. John Langley Jr.,Gary R. Allen and Gene R. Tyndall, Third-party-LogisticsServices

  • 8/8/2019 3 PL and 4 PL

    21/30

    2121

    A third-partylogistics contract is typically a major and complex business decision.

    Other than the pros and cons listed above, there are many considerations that are critical in

    deciding whether an agreement should be entered into with a particular 3 PL provider:

    Knowing ones costs:Among the most basic issues to consider in selecting a 3 PL provider is to know

    the companys own costs so they can be compared with the cost of using an

    outsourcing firm.

    It is necessary to use activity-based costing techniques, which involve tracing

    overhead and direct costs back to specific products and services.

    Customer orientation of the 3PL:

    Apart from costs,many of the advantages of 3 PL are intangibles such as

    flexibility.

    3 PL ISSUESANDREQUIREMENTS

  • 8/8/2019 3 PL and 4 PL

    22/30

    2222

    Customer orientation of the 3PL:

    There should be alignment between the strategic logistics plan of the company

    and 3 PL providers fit into this strategy.

    The success of the 3PL relationship is directly related to the ability of the provider

    to understand the needs of the hiring firm and to adapt its services to the special

    requirements of the firm.

    Reliability and flexibility to meet the hiring companys business expectations are

    the other major factors.

    3 PL ISSUESANDREQUIREMENTS

    Specialization of the 3PL: It is important the companies should consider 3 PLs whose roots lie in the

    particular area of logistics.

    Some firms have even more specialized requirements, and these should be

    considered carefully when choosing a 3 PL partner.

  • 8/8/2019 3 PL and 4 PL

    23/30

    2323

    3 PL IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES First 6 months to a year is both the most difficult and the most criticalpart of any 3 PL

    alliance.

    The companypurchasing the services must identify exactly what it needs for the

    relationship to be successful.

    Effective communication within the company and between the company and the 3PL is

    important.

    The third party and its service providers must respect the confidentiality of the data.

    Specific performance measures must be agreed upon.

    Specific criteria regarding subcontractors should be discussed.

    Arbitration issues should be considered before entering into a contract.

    Exit clauses should be negotiated into the contract.

  • 8/8/2019 3 PL and 4 PL

    24/30

  • 8/8/2019 3 PL and 4 PL

    25/30

  • 8/8/2019 3 PL and 4 PL

    26/30

    26

    Drawbacks of 3PL/Need for 4PL

    ` N o n Global Reach of 3PLs

    ` Still requires top management's time to manage relationships

    & resources

    ` Unable to cover full range of SC requirements e.g. logistics

    information, technical development

    ` Lack of shared goals

    ` Lack of expertise in the Clients industry.

    ` 3PLs target the function not the process.

  • 8/8/2019 3 PL and 4 PL

    27/30

    27

    Characteristics of a 4PL

    ` Non Asset based

    ` Technology is one of the prime capabilities

    ` Shipper perspective.

    ` BPO approach to provide a solution.

    ` Typically established as a JV or long term contract

    ` Responsible for management and operation of entire supply

    chain

    ` Continuous flow of information between partners and 4PL

    organisation

  • 8/8/2019 3 PL and 4 PL

    28/30

    28

    The Indian Scenario

  • 8/8/2019 3 PL and 4 PL

    29/30

    29

    Logistics Outsourcing in India

    ` The Indian logistics market, valued at around US$130 billionis expected to grow at a compounded annual growth rate ofaround 7% .

    ` Multinational and National Logistics players present.` The Indian logistics industry suffers from inadequate

    infrastructure, complex tax laws and insufficienttechnological aids.

    ` 75% do not use 3PL services because they are not sure ofproviders capability

    ` Use of IT in 3PL services is verylow both byuser andprovider

    ` Although 3PLs provide a whole range of supply chainservices, they are unable to satisfy the corporates totallogistics requirements.

  • 8/8/2019 3 PL and 4 PL

    30/30

    30

    Contd

    ` Many Indian players like e-logistics, Apollo Tyre Group, TVS

    group expanding their capabilities to 4PL & More

    ` With improving infrastructure and growing realization of the

    benefits of 3PL, this model is going to increase.