3 Cleaning Wet Etch

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/25/2019 3 Cleaning Wet Etch

    1/34

    1

    Cleaning and wet etching

    Contents

    Cleaning of Si wafers

    Mechanism of wet etching

    Etching chemistry of Si and III-V semiconductors

  • 7/25/2019 3 Cleaning Wet Etch

    2/34

    2

    Cleaning

    The most frequent use of wet etching Cleaning of a Si wafer

    Target

    particles

    alkaline metals, heavy metals

    organicsnative oxide of Si

    Method

    dissolution into a solvent

    lift-off

    prevention of re-adsorptionformation of complex ions such as CuCu2+Cu(NH3)4

    2+

    etching

  • 7/25/2019 3 Cleaning Wet Etch

    3/34

    3

    Typical cleaning

    RCA cleaning SC1 H2O2+NH4OH

    Oxidizer: H2O2

    Complex formation: NH4OH

    Metal dissolution under high pH

    but some metals such as Al, Fe cannot dissolve Particle removal etching + control of Zeta potential

    SC2 H2O2+HCl

    Removal of residual metals

    dissolution under low pH

    SPMsulfonic acid and hydrogen peroxide mixture

    Oxidation of organics

    H2SO4 + H2O2 H2SO5 + H2O

    Strong removal of resists

    Caution: sulfur tends to remain on the surface

  • 7/25/2019 3 Cleaning Wet Etch

    4/34

    4

    Typical solutions for etching

    Name conditions Target of

    removal

    Side effects pH Surface

    oxideSC1

    APM

    NH4OH:H2O2:H2O

    =1:1:5

    7080, 10 min

    Particles

    Organics

    Metal

    contamination

    10-12 formed

    SC2

    HPM

    HCl:H2O2:H2O

    =1:1:5

    7080, 10 min

    Metals Particles

    adsorption

    0-2 formed

    SPM H2SO4:H2O2=4:1

    100120, 10 min

    Organics

    Metals

    Particles

    adsorption

    0-2 formed

    Diluted HF HF 0.510% Native oxide ofSi

    Metals

    (except for Cu)

    Particles

    adsorption

    Cu deposition

    (CuF2)

    0-2 Removal

    of SiO2

    Buffered HF HF:NH4F

    =7:1

    Native oxide of

    Si

    Particles

    adsorption

    Cu deposition

    0-2 Removal

    of SiO2

    Concentration of solutions above (approximated values):

    NH4OH 28%, H2O2 30%, HCl 36%, H2SO4 98%, HF 50%, NH4F 40%

  • 7/25/2019 3 Cleaning Wet Etch

    5/34

    5

    Hydrogen termination of Si surface

    HF: removal of SiO2

    Hydrogen termination stable under atmosphere

    HF reacts with bones and damage tissues

    (with extreme pain)

    If HF attaches your skin, wash intensively and treat with calciumgluconate gel (this must be equipped aside any draft chamber)

  • 7/25/2019 3 Cleaning Wet Etch

    6/34

    6

    Merit of wet etching and its applications

    Low damage, large area Wrapping of a wafer surface, cleaning

    Removal of surface damage induced by dry etching

    Dependence on crystallographic orientation

    Anisotropic shape suitable for MEMS etc.

    High selectivity

    Precise depth control by using etch-stop layer

    Etch pits Evaluation of dislocation density

    Doping dependence Characterization of a p-n junction

  • 7/25/2019 3 Cleaning Wet Etch

    7/347

    Anisotropic wet etching

    (100) (111) (110)

    (001) surface

    (111) limiting

    isotropic

    (110) limiting

    with IPA 250 ml/L

  • 7/25/2019 3 Cleaning Wet Etch

    8/348

    Anisotropic wet etching

    The crystallographic surface with the minimum etchingrate appears

    Etching solutions

    KOH

    TMAH (tetramethyl ammonium hydroxide);(CH3)4NOH

    With KOH, the etching rates for Si crystal planes

    (110) > (100) >> (111)

    With IPA (100)>(110)>>(111)

    The mechanism for different etching rates

    A hypothesis: atomically flat and dense surfaces are

    etched more slowly

  • 7/25/2019 3 Cleaning Wet Etch

    9/349

    KOH etching of Si (anisotropy)

    Wind RA, Jones H, Little MJ, Hines MA. J Phys Chem B 2002;106(7):155769.

  • 7/25/2019 3 Cleaning Wet Etch

    10/34

  • 7/25/2019 3 Cleaning Wet Etch

    11/3411

    Category of etching mechanism

    Anodic dissolution GaAs + 6h+(VB)Ga3+ + As3+ More likely for p-type semiconductors

    Application of positive bias (hole supply) etching enhancement

    For n-type semiconductors, light irradiation is necessary.

    Electroless dissolution

    Band alignment condition (along the electron energy axis)

    Valence band edge > redox potential of a reaction

    Chemical dissolution

    Etching reagent: H2O2, Cl2, Br2, I2, OCl-, HCl, HBr

    Etching rate is independent of the surface electric potential

    No progress with the surface is covered with native oxide.

    (a) Ox+Red + h+(VB)

    (b) GaAs + 6 h+ (VB) Ga3+ + As3+

  • 7/25/2019 3 Cleaning Wet Etch

    12/3412

    Examples of etching mechanism

  • 7/25/2019 3 Cleaning Wet Etch

    13/3413

    Band bending at semiconductor-liquid interface

  • 7/25/2019 3 Cleaning Wet Etch

    14/3414

    Surface charge of a semiconductor in a solution

  • 7/25/2019 3 Cleaning Wet Etch

    15/3415

    Mott-Schottky plot

    fbDSC

    VVeNC

    -

    0

    2

    21

    This method is sometimes

    used for the characterizationof dopant ion concentration.

    (probably the same as carrier

    concentration)

  • 7/25/2019 3 Cleaning Wet Etch

    16/3416

    The Energy level of a redox system

    A chemical redox reaction

    Red = Ox+ + e- equilibrium potential: E0Applied bias E>E0more positive Red Ox

    + + e- (e- extraction from liq.)

    Applied bias EE

    0positive

    EF

    E (111)B > (100) > (111)A

  • 7/25/2019 3 Cleaning Wet Etch

    29/34

    29

    Polarization dependence of GaN wet etching rate

    Etching rate

    N polar >> Ga polar

    Etching mechanism

    OH- attacks a Ga atom

    Oxidation of Ga

    Dissolution of Ga oxide Why N-polar surface is etched faster

    Dangling bond of N (filled with

    electrons) are relatively sparse on

    the surface

    (charge repulsion between the

    dangling bond and OH-

    More Ga bonds with OH- are

    exposed after N removal

    D. Zhuang, J.H. Edgar / Materials Science and Engineering R 48 (2005) 146

  • 7/25/2019 3 Cleaning Wet Etch

    30/34

    30

    Rate-limiting processes of wet etching

    Transport of etching reagent to the surface Surface reaction

    Electrochemical

    Chemical

    Dissolution of etching products

    Transport-limited viscous solution, high temperature

    Isotropic (no dependence on crystallographic

    orientation)

    Rate dependence on pattern density

    Surface-reaction limited less viscous, low temperature

    Dependence on crystallographic orientation

  • 7/25/2019 3 Cleaning Wet Etch

    31/34

    31

    Typical etching solutions for Si

    Solution Rate

    (mm/min)

    comment Ref.

    Si3 HF (50%) + 5 HNO3 (70%) + 3CH3COOH

    35 1

    1 HF (50%) + 5 HNO3 (70%) +2CH3COOH

    +0.3g I2/250ml H2O

    7 1

    100HF + 0.1%HNO3Light irradiation

    Visualization of p-njunctions

    1

    50% KOH @70 (110) 1.0(100) 0.9(111)

  • 7/25/2019 3 Cleaning Wet Etch

    32/34

    32

    Typical etching solutions for III-V semiconductors

    GaAs

    4 H2SO4 (98%) + 1 H2O2 (30%) + 1H2O@50

    3 5

    1 NaOH (1N) + 1 H2O2 (0.8 N) 0.2 53 H3PO4 (85%) + 1 H2O2 (30%) + 50 H2O 0.1 7

    1 H3PO4 (85%) + 9 H2O2 (30%) + 1 H2O 5 Dependent on crystallographicorientation

    7

    Br2 (1% ) + CH3OH 9 (111)Aplane tends to appear 6InP

    HCl (12N) 12 Nonlinear dependence on HCl conc. if diluted 4

    1 HCl (12N) + 1 CH3COOH (17N) 6 Nonlinear dependence on HCl conc. if diluted

    4

    1 HCl (12N) + 1 H3PO4 (17N) 4 41 HCl (12N) + 1 HNO3 (15N) 7 4HBr (9N) 6.5 4Br2 (1% ) + CH3OH 12 (111)Aplane tends to appear 4

    GaNKOH - Very slow. Only N-polar surfaces areetched.

    2

    AlNKOH 2.3 Faster for N-polar surfaces, but Al-

    polar surfaces are also etched with areduced rate.

    2

    SiCK3Fe(CN)6 100 Only Si-polar surfaces are etched. 2

    Room temperature is assumed if no temperature is specified. N for concentration stands for mol/L.

  • 7/25/2019 3 Cleaning Wet Etch

    33/34

    33

    References

    [1] S. M. Sze

    [2] D. Zhuang, J.H. Edgar, Materials Science and Engineering R 48 (2005) 146[3] Wind RA, Jones H, Little MJ, Hines MA. J Phys Chem B 2002;106(7):155769[4] S. Adachi and H. kawaguchi, J. Electrochemical. Soc. 128 (1981) 1342-1349.[5] I. Shiota, K. Motoya, T. Ohmi, N. Miyamoto and J. Nishizawa, J. Electrochem. Soc. 124 (1977) 155-157.[6] Y. Tarui, Y. Komiya and H. Harada, J. Electrochem. Soc. 118 (1971) 118.[7] Y. Mori and N. Watanabe, J. Electrochem. Soc. 125 (1978) 1510-1514.

  • 7/25/2019 3 Cleaning Wet Etch

    34/34

    Etching solutions for oxides and metals