Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Advanced Resources InternationalMay 6, 2008
Storing COStoring CO22 with with Enhanced Oil RecoveryEnhanced Oil Recovery
Prepared for:2008 CCS Conference
Prepared by:Robert FergusonTyler Van LeeuwenVello KuuskraaAdvanced Resources International, Inc.
May 6, 2008Pittsburgh, PA
Advanced Resources InternationalMay 6, 2008
OutlineOutline
• Background• Methodology• Technically Recoverable Resource• CO2 Demand and Recoverable Oil Resource• Market Demand for CO2: Power Plant Perspective• Summary Remarks
Advanced Resources InternationalMay 6, 2008
The Goal
Reduce EmissionsUS GHG Emissions
Source: Lashof, Hawkins. NRDC 2006
Advanced Resources InternationalMay 6, 2008
Challenges and Barriers
• GHG Reduction “Solutions”– Carbon Capture & Storage– High Efficiency Electric Vehicles– Nuclear Power– 2nd Generation Biofuels
• Are 10 years away– Climate scientists tell us GHG emissions need to
peak in 10-15 years, then begin dramatic decline.
Advanced Resources InternationalMay 6, 2008
The Role of CO2-EOR in Reducing GHG Emissions
• Revenues from sale of captured CO2 can Jump-start the application of CCS technology
• Oil produced from CO2-EOR has lower carbon impact than traditionally produced oil.
Advanced Resources InternationalMay 6, 2008
Large Volumes Of Domestic Oil Remain “Stranded” After Traditional Primary/Secondary Oil Recovery
Original Oil In-Place: 596 B Barrels*“Stranded” Oil In-Place: 400 B Barrels*
Proved Reserves21 Billion Barrels
Future Challenge400 Billion Barrels
Cumulative Production175 Billion Barrels
*Based on field-by-field assessment of over 2,011 large U.S. oil fields accounting for 74% of domestic oil production; excludes deep-water GOM.Source: Advanced Resources International (2008)
Storing COStoring CO2 2 with EOR: A Large with EOR: A Large ““ValueValue--AddedAdded””Market for COMarket for CO22 EmissionsEmissions
Advanced Resources InternationalMay 6, 2008
Storing COStoring CO22 with Enhanced Oil Recoverywith Enhanced Oil RecoveryStoring CO2 with Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR)
provides an “early action pathway” for overcoming the initial barriers:• Regulatory / Public Acceptance• Long-term Liability • Pore space Ownership to Geological Storage of CO2
It can also provide significant revenues. For example, a one GWsize coal-fired power plant emitting 6 MMmt of CO2 a year and selling this CO2 (at pressure and at the plant gate) for $35 per mt would realize $6.3 billion in 30 years.
Advanced Resources InternationalMay 6, 2008
GROWTH OF CO2-EOR PRODUCTION IN THE U.S.
Oil and Gas Journal, 2008.
Advanced Resources InternationalMay 6, 2008
JAF01994.CDR
LaBargeGas PlantLaBarge
Gas Plant
Val VerdeGas PlantsVal Verde
Gas Plants
Enid FertilizerPlant
Enid FertilizerPlant
JacksonDome
JacksonDome
McElmo DomeSheep Mountain
Bravo Dome
McElmo DomeSheep Mountain
Bravo Dome
7
7
14
60
8
Dakota CoalGasification
Plant
Dakota CoalGasification
Plant
Antrim GasPlant
Antrim GasPlant
21
1
U.S. COU.S. CO22--EOR ACTIVITYEOR ACTIVITY
Number of CO2-EOR Projects
Natural CO2 Source
Industrial CO2 Source
CO2 Pipeline
101
Currently, 100 Domestic CO2-EOR projects provide 250,000 B/D Affordable natural CO2 launched CO2-EOR activity in the 1980’sFederal tax credits (Sec.43) and state severance tax relief still encourage CO2-EOR
Advanced Resources InternationalMay 6, 2008
The “Poster Child” - Weyburn Enhanced Oil Recovery Project(Maximizing Oil Recovery and CO2 Storage)
• Largest CO2 EOR project in Canada:
– 1.4 billion barrels (OOIP) oil field
• Outstanding EOR response • World’s largest geological CO2
sequestration project– 2.4 MMt/year – 23 MMt with EOR– 55 MMt with EOR/sequestration
Regina
Weyburn
CO2Beulah
North Dakota
Saskatchewan
Montana
ManitobaCanadaUSA
Canada
USA
Source: EnCana, 2005
Advanced Resources InternationalMay 6, 2008
Methodology
Advanced Resources InternationalMay 6, 2008
Storing COStoring CO22 with Enhanced Oil Recoverywith Enhanced Oil Recovery
Advanced Resources recently completed a report for DOE/NETL entitled “Storing CO2 with Enhanced Oil Recovery,”* an update to the previously published “basin studies”.**
• Examines economically recoverable oil from applying CO2-EOR (oil price $70/B; CO2 cost $45/mt),
• Addresses market demand for CO2 by the EOR industry• Uses a streamline reservoir simulator and a data base of
2,012 large oil reservoirs (74% of U.S. oil production),• Covers 27 producing states plus offshore Louisiana.
*Available on the U.S. DOE web site. http://www.netl.doe.gov/energy-analyses/pubs/Storing%20CO2%20w%20EOR_FINAL.pdf**Available on the U.S. DOE web site. http://www.fe.doe.gov/programs/oilgas/eor/Ten_Basin-Oriented_CO2-EOR_Assessments.html
Advanced Resources InternationalMay 6, 2008
U.S. Basins/Regions Studied For COU.S. Basins/Regions Studied For CO22 Storage and Storage and Enhanced Oil RecoveryEnhanced Oil Recovery
The 27 states with shading are included in the eleven Advanced Resources International updated “basin studies”of CO2 storage with enhanced oil recovery.
Advanced Resources InternationalMay 6, 2008
CO2 Demand and
Recoverable Oil Resource
Advanced Resources InternationalMay 6, 2008
Domestic Oil Resources Technically and Domestic Oil Resources Technically and Economically Recoverable w/COEconomically Recoverable w/CO22--EOREOR
Billio
n of
Bar
rels
of O
il
*Already produced or place into proved reserves with CO2-EOR.**Assuming oil price of $70/B (real); CO2 costs (delivered to field at pressure) of $45/metric ton ($2.38/Mcf); investment hurdle rate (15% and 25% ROR, real).
87.1
47.4
0
20
40
60
80
100
TechnicallyRecoverable
EconomicallyRecoverable**(@ 15% ROR)
EconomicallyRecoverable**(@ 25% ROR)
40.5
**
Advanced Resources InternationalMay 6, 2008
JAF02709.PPT
Base CaseOil Price($70/Bbl)
Higher Oil Prices
($90/Bbl)
Econ
omica
lly R
ecov
erab
le Do
mes
tic O
il(B
illion
Bar
rels)
0
20
30
40
50 47.9
10
45.0
Lower Oil Price
($50/Bbl)
39.1
60
43.1
29.7
38.2
15% IRR 25% IRR 15% IRR 25% IRR 15% IRR 25% IRR 15% IRR 25% IRR
48.344.6
Higher Oil Prices
($100/Bbl)
Economically Recoverable Domestic Oil Resources from Applying CO2-EOR
Advanced Resources InternationalMay 6, 2008
Market Demand for COMarket Demand for CO22 by the Enhanced by the Enhanced Oil Recovery IndustryOil Recovery Industry(1)(1)M
illio
n M
etric
Ton
s
*CO2 demand being met by on-going CO2-EOR projects and CO2 demand in Alaska.**CO2 demand that can be met by natural CO2 and already being captured CO2 emissions.(1) Economic CO2 market demand for EOR at oil price of $70/B (real), CO2 cost of $45/mt, and ROR of 15% (real).
Total U.S.CO2 Demand
NewLower-48
CO2 Demand
Net Lower-48From CapturedCO2 Emissions
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,00012,500
9,700
7,500
2,800* 2,200**
Advanced Resources InternationalMay 6, 2008
Market Demand for CO2:Power Plant Perspective
Advanced Resources InternationalMay 6, 2008
The NEMS Electricity Market ModuleNEMS Regions: CO2 supply and demand have been organized according
to the 14 NEMS regions (13 lower-48 plus Alaska) in the Electricity Market Module
JAF02709.PPT
Advanced Resources InternationalMay 6, 2008
Market Demand for COMarket Demand for CO22 by EORby EOR
Electricity Regions
New Coal Plants Market Demand for
CO2 Emissions(MMmt)
Ability to Meet Market
Demand(%)GW Capacity
30 years of CO2Emissions
(MMmt)
Region 2 – ERCOT (Texas) 16 GW 2,480 2,440 98%Region 9 – SERC (AR,LA, MS, AL, FL, TN, GA, SC, NC) 34 GW 5,270 1,700 32%
Region 13 – WECC/CA (California) - - 1,380 -
Region 10 – SWPP (OK, KS, NM) 7 GW 1,080 1,290 100+%Region 11/12 (WA, OR, ID, MT, WY, UT, NV)/(NM, CO, AZ) 26 GW 4,030 390 10%
All Others 14 GW 2,170 300 14%
TOTAL 97 GW 15,030 7,500 50%*After subtracting EOR market demand met by natural CO2 and being captured industrial sources.Source: AEO 2008 (March, 2008) and Advanced Resources International.
Advanced Resources InternationalMay 6, 2008
Relationship of CORelationship of CO22 Sales Price to Cost Offsets Sales Price to Cost Offsets in the Coalin the Coal--Fueled Power Sector (Year 2020)Fueled Power Sector (Year 2020)
7,920 btu/kWh x94 MMmt CO2/QBtu x
90% Capture
Sale of CO2 @ $25/mt CO2
Cost Offset:$16.80/MWh
Sale of CO2 @ $35/mt CO2
Cost Offset:$23.50/MWh
7,920 btu/kWh x94 MMmt CO2/QBtu x
90% Capture
Advanced Resources InternationalMay 6, 2008
Cost
of E
lectri
city (
$/MW
h)*
*Cost of electricity includes generation and transmission.
Source: AEO 2008, Reference Case (Electricity Market Module); CarBen 2008
Pulverized Coal
Advanced Coal (IGCC)
Advanced Coal w/CCS
Advanced Coal w/CCS and Sale of CO2
Advanced Nuclear
Reference Case2020
40
50
60
70
80
90
60 62
1981
Sale of Captured COSale of Captured CO22 Emissions Can Help Make Emissions Can Help Make Coal Plants w/CCS Competitive (Year 2020)Coal Plants w/CCS Competitive (Year 2020)
Advanced Coal w/EOR Revenues
2020
81
@ $35/mtfor CO2
5766
Advanced Resources InternationalMay 6, 2008
Cost
of E
lectri
city (
$/MW
h)*
*Cost of electricity includes generation and transmission.
Source: AEO 2008, Reference Case (Electricity Market Module); CarBen 2008
Advanced Coal w/CCS
Advanced Coal w/CCS and Sale of CO2
Advanced Coal w/CCS and “Learning”
Advanced Coal w/CCS, “Learning” and Sale of CO2
JAF02709.PPT
40
50
60
70
80
90
“Learning by Doing” can further decrease costs of deploying CCS in the Future
Advanced Coal w/EOR Revenues
2020
8175
Advanced Coal w/EOR Revenues and “Learning”
2020
@ $35/mt for CO2
@ $25/mt for CO2
57 58
Advanced Resources InternationalMay 6, 2008
20000
10000
5000
1000
10010 100 1000 10000 100000
1982
1987
1963
1980
Windmills (USA)(learning rate ~ 20%)
USAJapan
Cumulative MW Installed
19811983
500
Photovoltaics(learning rate ~ 20%)
Gas turbines (USA)(learning rate ~ 20%, ~10%)
US(1
990)
$/kW 1995
1992
200
2000
Costs of New CCS Technology Will Decline Due to “Learning”
Source: Nakicenovic, N., Grubler, A., and MacDonald, A., “Global Energy Perspectives”, ISBN-10: 0521645697, Cambridge University Press (1998).
Cost
Inde
x ($/k
W)
Number of Doublings (Installed Capacity)
Mean Learning Rate(115 Case Studies):-20% Per Doubling
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Modified from Nakicenovic (1998).
Historical Cost Reductions Rates from Learning Curves
Learning Curves for Energy Technologies
RD&D PhaseCommercialization Phase
Advanced Resources InternationalMay 6, 2008
Integrating CO2-EOR and CO2 Sequestration shows that much more CO2 can be stored, making the additional oil produced “GREEN OIL”*.
“State of the Art” “Next Generation”
(millions) EOR Seq. Total
CO2 Storage (tonnes) 19 76 33 109
Storage Capacity Utilization 13% 52% 24% 76%
Oil Recovery (barrels) 64 180 - 180
% Carbon Neutral (“Green Oil”) 70% 100% - 160%
Integrating CO2-EOR and CO2 Storage
*”Green Oil” means that more CO2 is injected and stored underground than the volume of CO2 contained in the produced oil, once burned.
Advanced Resources InternationalMay 6, 2008
Summary RemarksSummary Remarks
• CO2-EOR offers a large, “value added” market for captured CO2 emissions of 7,500 million metric tons (equal to 49 GWs of advanced coal-fired power).
• Storing CO2 with EOR helps bypass three of today’s barriers to geological storage of CO2 - -regulatory/public acceptance, mineral (pore space) rights and long-term liability;
• The oil produced with CO2–EOR is 70% “carbon-free”. It can become 100+% “carbon-free” with “next generation” technology.
Advanced Resources InternationalMay 6, 2008
AdvancedResources
Internationalwww.adv-res.com
Office LocationsWashington, DC4501 Fairfax Drive, Suite 910Arlington, VA 22203Phone: (703) 528-8420Fax: (703) 528-0439
Houston, Texas11490 Westheimer, Suite 520Houston, TX 77042Phone: (281) 558-6569Fax: (281) 558-9202
Advanced Resources InternationalMay 6, 2008
Appendix Slides
Advanced Resources InternationalMay 6, 2008
Economics and Cost Model• Costs Accounted For:
– Drilling new wells or reworking existing wells– Surface equipment for new wells– CO2 recycle plant and CO2 spurline from main trunkline to the oil
field
– Operation and Maintenance (O&M)• Lifting produced fluids• Capturing, Separating, and Reinjecting CO2
• Economics:– Economic model uses an industry standard cash flow that can be
run on a pattern or a field-wide level and it accounts for:• Royalties• Severance and Ad Valorem Taxes• Oil Gravity and Market Location Differentials• Oil Prices, CO2 Costs, and Other Variables
Advanced Resources InternationalMay 6, 2008
CO2 Injection and Storage Process• Initially, purchased CO2, equal to 1 HCPV is injected with water for mobility control.
• As oil is produced, CO2 is separated from the oil and reinjected. As produced volumes of CO2 increase, these larger volumes are reinjected.
• At the end of the project, operator can close the field at pressure, storing essentially all of the injected CO2, or inject a large (1 to 2 HCPV) slug of water to recover any remaining oil and CO2. This CO2 may be used again.
Advanced Resources InternationalMay 6, 2008
State/ Province (storage location)
Source Type (location)
CO2 Supply MMcfd**
Natural AnthropogenicTexas-Utah-New Mexico-Oklahoma
Geologic (Colorado-New Mexico) Gas Processing (Texas) 1,700 110
Colorado-Wyoming Gas Processing (Wyoming) - 340Mississippi Geologic (Mississippi) 700 -Michigan Gas Processing Plant (Michigan) - 15Oklahoma Fertilizer Plant (Oklahoma) - 35Saskatchewan Coal Gasification (North Dakota) - 145
TOTAL 2,400 645
* Source: 12th Annual CO2 Flooding Conference, Dec. 2006** MMcfd of CO2 can be converted to million metric tons per year by first multiplying by 365 (days per year) and then dividing by 18.9 * 103 (Mcf per metric ton).
Injection of Natural and Injection of Natural and Anthropogenic COAnthropogenic CO2 2 for EORfor EOR
Advanced Resources InternationalMay 6, 2008
Market Demand for COMarket Demand for CO22 by EMM Regionby EMM RegionNEMS EMM Purchased CO2 Natural Industrial
Unmet (Net) Demand for CO2Region Requirements CO2* CO2*
(Tcf) (Tcf) (MMcfd) (Tcf) (Tcf) (Million mt)
Region 1 - ECAR 1.1 - 15 ** 1.1 58
Region 2 – ERCOT 72.3 25 110 1.2 46.1 2,438
Region 3 – PJM (MAAC) 0.1 - - - 0.1 4
Region 4 – MAIN 1.9 - - - 1.9 100
Region 5 – MAPP 2.1 - - - 2.1 109
Region 6 – NY ISO - - - - - -
Region 7 – NW ISO - - - - - -
Region 8 – Florida 0.2 - - - 0.2 9
Region 9 – SERC 40.0 8 - - 32.0 1,695
Region 10 – SWPP 29.7 5 35 0.4 24.3 1,286
Region 11 – WECC/NWPP 7.8 - 175 1.9 5.9 311
Region 12 – WECC/RMPP 2.3 - 65 0.7 1.6 83
Region 13 – WECC/CA 26.0 - - - 26.0 1,377
Region 14 - Alaska 39.6 5 - - 34.6 1,831
TOTAL U.S. 223.0 43 385.0 4.2 175.8 9,302
Lower-48 183.4 38 385.0 4.2 141.2 7,470*Assumed available to be produced and productively used by the CO2-EOR industry in the next 30 years.
**Less than 0.01 Tcf and therefore not included in totals