2.2 Competitive Analysis

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 2.2 Competitive Analysis

    1/34

    Competitive Analysis

    Prof. P.V.S.SAI

    SSIM

    HYDERABAD

  • 7/31/2019 2.2 Competitive Analysis

    2/34

    Why we need to study competition?

    Competition implies rivalry betweentwo or more interested parties forsimilar goals.

    In business it refers to the drive forthe share of market consisting ofsimilar customers.

  • 7/31/2019 2.2 Competitive Analysis

    3/34

    Traditional view of Competition

    Has been around variables of marketstrategy like product quality,adherence to delivery schedules,

    attractive prices and aggressivepromotion.

    This is not sufficient and companies

    should focus on deep routed aspectslike Whys and Hows

  • 7/31/2019 2.2 Competitive Analysis

    4/34

  • 7/31/2019 2.2 Competitive Analysis

    5/34

    Types of Competitive Advantage

    Ohmae and others identified twotypes of competitive advantage

    1. Operational Competitive Advantage

    2. Strategic Competitive Advantage

  • 7/31/2019 2.2 Competitive Analysis

    6/34

    Operational CompetitiveAdvantage refers to the short termadvantage of a company over its

    competitors

    Strategic Competitive Advantagerefers to the competitive advantage

    which enhances and ensures longterm profit potential.

  • 7/31/2019 2.2 Competitive Analysis

    7/34

    Competition: Some theoretical

    constructs

    The Economists View Point

    The Marketing View Point

    Porters Frame workCloser Analysis of competition

    Ohmae model of building

    Competitive AdvantagePorters model of buildingcompetitive advantage

  • 7/31/2019 2.2 Competitive Analysis

    8/34

    The Economists view point

    Provides useful insights into thenature of industry structure. This, toa large extent, determines a firms

    behaviour in market place. This canbe understood by analyzing IndustryStructure.

  • 7/31/2019 2.2 Competitive Analysis

    9/34

    Types of Industry StructureFACTOR PERFECT

    COMPETITIONMONOPOLISTICCOMPETITION

    OLIGOPOLY MONOPOLY

    Number ofPlayers

    ---------------

    ProductDifferentiation

    ---------------

    Entry or Exit

    Many

    ---------

    NO

    ---------

    Open

    Some

    ---------

    YES

    ---------

    Open

    Few

    -------

    YES

    -------

    Restricted

    One

    ---------

    UNKNOWN

    ________

    Blocked

  • 7/31/2019 2.2 Competitive Analysis

    10/34

    Perfectly competitive industry consists of largenumber of sellers, marketing undifferentiatedproducts.The other features are free entry and exit offirms, Perfect knowledge of market conditions,non intervention of the govt.In Monopolistic competition, there are manysellers, many customers and a differentiatedproduct.An Oligopoly situation lies between monopolisticcompetition and monopoly situations.Consolidations, Mergers and Acquisitions will leadto oligopolistic situation.

  • 7/31/2019 2.2 Competitive Analysis

    11/34

    The Marketing View PointCompetition is viewed through a buyers viewpoint.The buyer, in his drive to satisfy need, may finddifferent choices.

    Ex: Entertainment NeedChoices are:1. Visit to a Park2. A Social call on a friend3. A Visit to a restaurant

    4. Listening to music5. Seeing a movie6. Playing cards7. Going for a picnic

    8. Watching TV

  • 7/31/2019 2.2 Competitive Analysis

    12/34

    Thus, physical products may belongto different industries ortechnologies, they become

    competitors to each other.

    This view can be perceived asbelonging to four types of

    competitors.

  • 7/31/2019 2.2 Competitive Analysis

    13/34

    Kotlers Classification

    1. Desire Competitors

    2. Generic Competitors

    3. The Form Competitors4. The Brand Competitors

  • 7/31/2019 2.2 Competitive Analysis

    14/34

    Levits Classic Article on MarketingMyopia is an excellent illustration ofshifting the focus from product to

    need to ensure long term survivaland growth of a firm.

  • 7/31/2019 2.2 Competitive Analysis

    15/34

    Porters Framework to Analyze

    Industry Structure

    According to Porter the industry structurehas a strong influence in determining thecompetitive rules of the games as well as

    strategies potentially available to the firmThe intensity and the state of competitiondepends on five basic forces whichcollectively determine the ultimate profit

    potential in industry.

  • 7/31/2019 2.2 Competitive Analysis

    16/34

    The Five Forces are

    1. Rivalry among the currentcompetitors

    2. Threat of new entrants

    3. Threat of substitutes

    4. Bargaining power of suppliers

    5. Bargaining power of buyers

  • 7/31/2019 2.2 Competitive Analysis

    17/34

  • 7/31/2019 2.2 Competitive Analysis

    18/34

    Industry Rivalry

    Determined by1. Number of Competitors2. Industry Growth

    3. Asset Intensity4. Product Differentiation5. Exit Barriers

    Among them, the number ofcompetitors, and the industry growth aremost influential.

  • 7/31/2019 2.2 Competitive Analysis

    19/34

    Industries with high fixed costs arelikely to opt for price wars in case ofstagnant markets.

    Perceived or Real productdifferentiation dampens rivalry.

    Difficulty to exit intensifiescompetition.

  • 7/31/2019 2.2 Competitive Analysis

    20/34

    Threat of New Entrants

    The threat is intense in the case of maturemarkets.

    In the case of industry which is at

    introduction or growth stage, new playersare welcomed as this expands the market.

    In case of mature markets, barriers toentry can be due to high capital

    requirement, proprietary technology,inaccessibility to distribution. In theabsence of these entry barriers, intensityof competition may be severe. Ex: DotCom Business.

  • 7/31/2019 2.2 Competitive Analysis

    21/34

    Substitute Products

    Substitutable products satisfyingsimilar needs of the same customergroup can intensify the competition.

    The similarity may be in terms offunctional similarity, performancesimilarity or product identity. Ex:Steel tubes and PVC tubes, WoodenDoors and Plastic Doors, Leathershoes and Plastic shoes.

  • 7/31/2019 2.2 Competitive Analysis

    22/34

    Bargaining Power of Buyers

    Refers to the ability of the industryscustomers to force the industry to reduceprices or supply with extra features at thesame price.

    This usually happen when buyers havechoice of substitutes for the same product.High Buyers concentration, threat ofbackward integration and low switching

    costs add to the power of the buyers.Ex: Reliance industries entering intocement business.

  • 7/31/2019 2.2 Competitive Analysis

    23/34

    Bargaining power of Suppliers

    Refers to a situation where suppliers canforce the buyers to pay higher prices andthus effect their profitability.

    This would happen if suppliers enjoymonopoly.

    Suppliers concentration, Number ofbuyers, Switching costs, Substitute Rawmaterials and Threat of forwardintegration may decide this aspect.

  • 7/31/2019 2.2 Competitive Analysis

    24/34

    Competitor Analysis : A Closer

    Look

    A firm, for a corporate strategy in aworkable time frame, need to have acloser look on the immediate

    competitor.

    Hence, competitive behaviour ofeach competitor is to be understood.

    This can be done by putting thefollowing questions.

  • 7/31/2019 2.2 Competitive Analysis

    25/34

    1. What is their competitive strategy?

    2. How are they performing?

    3. What are their strengths andweaknesses?

    4. What actions can be expected from

    them in the near future?

  • 7/31/2019 2.2 Competitive Analysis

    26/34

    Competitor Strategy1. How is the competitor defining the business in

    terms of customer groups, customer functions,technologies and how vertically integrated ishe? How is he segmenting the markets andwhat are his target segments?

    2. What are his missions for the specific productlines, business units and firm as a whole?

    3. What are the specific contribution expectationsfrom each product line, business unit and forthe total organisation?

    4. What are dominant policies for each functionalarea like production, design, marketing and soon?

    5. What are his financial resources and how arethey being allocated over various business units

    and business functions?

  • 7/31/2019 2.2 Competitive Analysis

    27/34

    Competitor Performance

    The actual performance of thecompetitor, should be ascertainedwith the help of published

    information in terms of sales, profits,return on investment, market share,cash and cash flow situation?

    This should be a regular activityrather than a one time or ad hocactivity.

  • 7/31/2019 2.2 Competitive Analysis

    28/34

    Competitor Strengths and

    Weaknesses

    Function Facilitiesandequipment

    Personalskills

    Organizationalcapabilities

    Managementcapabilities

    Marketing Warehousing

    RetailOutlets

    SalesOffices

    Trainingfor salesstaff

    Door todoor selling

    RetailSelling

    Advertising

    After Sales

    service

    Directsales

    Servicenetwork

    Customer loyalty

    Industrialmarketing

    Householdmarketing

    LargeCustomer

    Base

  • 7/31/2019 2.2 Competitive Analysis

    29/34

    Competitors Reactions

    This helps a company to chooseDefense or Offense strategy.

    This can be studied at two levels:

    1. Reaction to the secular trends.

    2. Reaction to the moves of othercompetitors.

  • 7/31/2019 2.2 Competitive Analysis

    30/34

    Porters Generic Strategies

    Overall Cost Leadership

    Differentiation

    Focus.

  • 7/31/2019 2.2 Competitive Analysis

    31/34

    Overall Cost Leadership

    In this strategy, company makes allpossible attempts to achieve thelowest costs in production and

    marketing.

    Efficiency is the keyword guiding alldecisions to keep the costs low.

  • 7/31/2019 2.2 Competitive Analysis

    32/34

    Differentiation

    The aim is to achieve classleadership by creating somethingwhich is perceived as unique.

    The differentiation may be in termsof design or brand image, customerservice, or dealer network or any

    other feasible dimension.

  • 7/31/2019 2.2 Competitive Analysis

    33/34

    Focus

    The underlying assumptions in Focusis that a firm should be able to servea narrow strategic target effectively

    and efficiently.As a result the firm achieves eitherdifferentiation from meeting theneed of a particular target segmentbetter, or lower costs in serving thetarget, on both.

  • 7/31/2019 2.2 Competitive Analysis

    34/34