1
Impacts of US Tax Reform How profit repatriation may affect your company In 2005, shareholders benefited the most from profit repatriation 1 History and recent sentiment surveys suggest most companies will use excess profits to buy back shares: 2017 survey suggests debt paydowns are the top priority: 2 US firms collectively hold approximately: The amount of non-USD cash held overseas is small relative to daily FX spot volumes. 2005 Historic Precedent The Homeland Investment Act of 2004 provided a one-time, year-long tax holiday that allowed US firms to repatriate foreign earnings. 8 Despite a few high-profile cases of companies increasing employee pay and benefits, Despite small volume growth, USD appreciated during the Homeland Investment Act of 2005, disrupting a three-year bearish run - despite small FX market volume growth. 11 What will your company do with the windfall? Some companies are spending their windfall on employee compensation and benefits. If companies in your industry are taking this approach, will you? Should you change your global corporate structure? 5 Windfall or not, companies are realizing that their current or planned global corporate structure may not be optimal. If your US corporate profits will no longer be held overseas, the benefit tradeoffs between centralized and decentralized global corporate structures will change: In 2005, Each $1 increase in repatriation (following tax holiday) was associated with a ... To retain acceptable leverage ratios, it is likely repayment of non-USD debt will take priority over USD-denominated debt. 4 If repatriation proceeds are used, it will not lead to additional purchases of USD. 79 cents increase in share repurchases and a The Top 5 companies ranked by cash holdings account for roughly 30% of the total: Technology companies hold 47% of the total The Top 50 companies account for close to 70% of the total $800 billion 3 in non-USD debt, sizeable sum when compared to the ... Estimates of cash held overseas by US corporations run as high as $3 trillion 6 Daily turnover (or volumes) in FX spot markets is estimated at $1.6 trillion 7 $1.3 trillion 6 potential repatriation pool 15 cents increase in dividends While repatriation's impact on FX market volume will be negligible compared with daily turnover, history suggests tax reform may be bullish for the US dollar. How will your global funding strategy be impacted? Cash overseas is highly concentrated and held by a small subset of firms 12 Tradeoffs related to FX risk management Hedge accounting adoption benefit Control of management KPI’s Translation FX exposure Income statement FX volatility More More Less More Centralized Decentralized Less Less More Less It is easier to quality for ASC 815 cash flow hedging treatment if revenues are denominated in a different currency than the functional currency of the entity. Hedge accounting adoption yields greater control of management performance metrics such as top-line revenues, EBITDA, cash-burn rates, etc. More FX exposure is created upon ASC 830 translation of foreign entities under decentralized structures where billing and collecting is done overseas. Billing non-USD revenue out of a US or USD-denominated entity makes the risk more visible when compared to situations in which billing and functional currencies match, however it is easier to manage. A significant portion of overseas cash is in USD – so no foreign exchange transaction is needed. Profit repatriation from volumes alone is unlikely to move foreign currency markets ... Centralized Billing and collecting from US entity for foreign revenue Decentralized Billing and collecting overseas for foreign revenue Reducing the corporate income tax rate to Want to discuss your specific situation? Contact your SVB FX Advisor or the SVB FX team at [email protected] makes it likely that profit repatriation will sharply increase. 21% 65% 42% 46% 1 3 2 Debt paydown Share repurchases Capital expenditure M&A 35% Dividends 29% Fund pension 12% In 2004, daily spot turnover was $621 billion 10 In 2005, US corporations repatriated approximately $300 billion 9 Direct impact: The FX market volumes were not affected. Changes of sentiment introduce a bullish bias to the USD. Parent bills and collects euro into a multi-currency account (MCA) and needs to fund cost-plus entity to pay employees and vendors Parent is USD-functional and owns euro-functional sub Subsidiary uses euro to fund service contracts End customer pays euro Parent funds cost-plus entity to pay employees and vendors Sub bills and collects in euro, and incurs costs in euro Parent invoices end customer in euro Earnings not repatriated back to parent, reinvested abroad Alphabet Cisco Microsoſt Oracle Apple % change in trade-weighted USD index by year Early-stage innovation companies generally operate with centralized global structures Some early-stage firms are holding off on plans to transfer IP overseas until the full impact of tax reform has been understood. As companies mature and become cash-flow positive, they may move billing and collecting overseas Five commonly cited reasons: profit repatriation in 2005 did not lead to an increase in domestic spending, employment, R&D or management compensation. This article is intended for US audiences only. ©2018 SVB Financial Group. All rights reserved. Silicon Valley Bank is a member of the Federal Reserve System. Silicon Valley Bank is the California bank subsidiary of SVB Financial Group (Nasdaq: SIVB). SVB, SVB FINANCIAL GROUP, SILICON VALLEY BANK, MAKE NEXT HAPPEN NOW and the chevron device are trademarks of SVB Financial Group, used under license. This material, including without limitation the statistical information herein, is provided for informational purposes only. The material is based in part upon information from third-party sources that we believe to be reliable, but which has not been independently verified by us and, as such, we do not represent that the information is accurate or complete. The information should not be viewed as tax, investment, legal or other advice nor is it to be relied on in making an investment or other decisions. You should obtain relevant and specific professional advice before making any investment decision. Nothing relating to the material should be construed as a solicitation or offer, or recommendation, to acquire or dispose of any investment or to engage in any other transaction. Foreign exchange transactions can be highly risky, and losses may occur in short periods of time if there is an adverse movement of exchange rates. Exchange rates can be highly volatile and are impacted by numerous economic, political and social factors, as well as supply and demand and governmental intervention, control and adjustments. Investments in financial instruments carry significant risk, including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. Before entering any foreign exchange transaction, you should obtain advice from your own tax, financial, legal and other advisors, and only make investment decisions on the basis of your own objectives, experience and resources. Parent Parent EUR EUR EUR EUR EUR Sub Sub Customer EUR Customer Tax/ repatriation strategy Incoming/ outgoing payment efficiencies Compliance with local legal/regulatory requirements Desire to establish self-funding entities Competitive pressures Such decentralized billing and collecting structures, however, also may result in negative tradeoffs related to foreign currency risk management. Later-stage companies that currently bill out of stand-alone foreign entities are assessing the benefits of US-centralization. 1. Source: Dharmapala, Dhammika, C. Fritz Foley, and Kristin J. Forbes (2009). “Watch what I do, not what I say: The unintended consequences of the Homeland Investment Act”. NBER Working Paper #15023. 2. Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Advisors. Responses from BofAML's 20th Risk Management Survey. Percentages do not add up to 100% since respondents can select more than one. 3. Source: Bloomberg query (SRCH <Go>). 4. Non-USD debt is oſten used to hedge the USD value of retained earnings in foreign subs (i.e. net investment hedging). Thus if cash is repatriated, hedges must be unwound. 5. Source: SVB FX Risk Advisory. 6. Moody’s Investor Service: $1.3trn, US Joint Committee of Taxation: $2.6trn, Goldman Sachs: $3.1trn, etc. 7. According to the 2016 Triennial Central Bank Survey of foreign exchange and OTC derivatives markets published by the Bank of International Settlements. 8. Domestic tax rate on repatriated funds was cut to 5.25%, down from 35%. 9. According to Bureau of Economic Analysis. $300bn estimate is based on a 5x trailing 5-year average repatriation. 10. According to the 2016 Triennial Central Bank Survey of foreign exchange and OTC derivatives markets published by the Bank of International Settlements. 11. One other important reason the USD appreciated in 2005: Fed hiked rates 8 times that year. 12. Moody's report - "US Non-Financial Companies: Cash pile grows 9.2% to $1.84 trillion; tech extends lead over other sectors”. 5% 0% -5% -10% -15% 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 -9% -14% -5% -3% 5%

21%repatriation will sharply increase. - SVB

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    8

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 21%repatriation will sharply increase. - SVB

Impacts of US Tax Reform

How pro�t repatriation may a�ect your company

In 2005, shareholders bene�ted the mostfrom pro�t repatriation1 History and recent sentiment surveys suggest most companies will use excess prots to buy back shares:

2017 survey suggests debt paydowns are the top priority:2

US �rms collectively hold approximately:

The amount of non-USD cash held overseas is small relative to daily FX spot volumes.

2005 Historic PrecedentThe Homeland Investment Act of 2004 provided a one-time, year-long tax holiday that allowed US rms to repatriate foreign earnings.8

Despite a few high-pro�le cases of companies increasing employee pay and bene�ts,

Despite small volume growth, USD appreciated during the Homeland Investment Act of 2005, disrupting a three-year bearish run - despite small FX market volume growth.11

What will your company do with the windfall?Some companies are spending their windfall on employee compensation and benefits. If companies in your industry are taking this approach, will you?

Should you change your global corporate structure?5

Windfall or not, companies are realizing that their current or planned global corporate structure may not be optimal.

If your US corporate pro�ts will no longer be held overseas, the bene�t tradeo�s between centralized and decentralized global corporate structures will change:

In 2005,Each $1 increase in repatriation (following tax holiday) was associated with a ...

To retain acceptable leverage ratios, it is likely repayment of non-USD debt will take priority over USD-denominated debt.4 If repatriation proceeds are used, it will not lead to additional purchases of USD.

79 cents increase in sharerepurchases and a

The Top 5companies

ranked by cash holdings account

for roughly 30%

of the total: Technology companies hold 47% of the total

The Top 50 companies account for close to70% of the total

$800 billion3

in non-USD debt, sizeable sum when compared to the ...

Estimates of cashheld overseas by US corporations

run as high as$3

trillion6

Daily turnover(or volumes) in FX spot markets is estimated at$1.6trillion7

$1.3 trillion6

potential repatriation pool

15 cents increase in dividends

While repatriation's impact on FX market volume will be negligible compared with daily turnover, history suggests tax reform may be bullish for the US dollar.

How will your global funding strategy be impacted?

Cash overseas is highly concentrated and held by a small subset of �rms12

Tradeo�s related to FX risk management

Hedge accounting adoption benet

Control of management KPI’s

Translation FX exposure

Income statement FX volatility

More

More

Less

More

Centralized Decentralized

Less

Less

More

Less

It is easier to quality for ASC 815 cash �ow hedging treatment if revenues are denominated in a di�erent currency than the functional currency of the entity.

Hedge accounting adoption yields greater control of  management performance metrics such as top-line revenues, EBITDA, cash-burn rates, etc.

More FX exposure is created upon ASC 830 translation of foreign entities under decentralized structures where billing and collecting is done overseas.

Billing non-USD revenue out of a US or USD-denominated entity makes the risk more visible when compared to situations in which billing and functional currencies match, however it is easier to manage.

A signicant portion of overseas cash is in USD – so no foreign exchange transaction is needed.

Pro�t repatriation from volumes alone is unlikely to move foreign currency markets ...

CentralizedBilling and collecting from US entity for foreign revenue

DecentralizedBilling and collecting overseas for foreign revenue

Reducing the corporate income tax rate to

Want to discuss your specific situation? Contact your SVB FX Advisor or the SVB FX team at [email protected]

makes it likely that pro�t repatriation will sharply increase.21%

65% 42%46%1 32

Debtpaydown

Sharerepurchases

Capitalexpenditure

M&A

35%

Dividends29%

Fundpension

12%

In 2004, daily spot

turnover was $621

billion10

In 2005, US corporations repatriated approximately $300billion9

Direct impact: The FX market volumes were not a�ected. Changes of sentiment introduce a bullish bias to the USD.

Parent bills and collects euro into a multi-currency account (MCA) and needs to fund cost-plus entity to pay employees and vendors

Parent is USD-functional and owns euro-functional sub

Subsidiary uses euro to fund service

contracts

End customer pays euro

Parent funds cost-plus entity to pay employees and vendors

Sub bills and collects in euro, and incurs costs in euro

Parent invoices end customer in euro

Earnings not repatriated back to parent, reinvested abroad

AlphabetCiscoMicroso�

OracleApple

% change in trade-weighted USD index by year

Early-stage innovation companies generally operate with centralized global structures

Some early-stage rms are holding o� on plans to transfer IP overseas until the full impact of tax reform has been understood.

As companies mature and become cash-�ow positive, they may move billing and collecting overseas Five commonly cited reasons:

prot repatriation in 2005 did not lead to an increase in domestic spending, employment, R&D or management compensation.

This article is intended for US audiences only.

©2018 SVB Financial Group. All rights reserved. Silicon Valley Bank is a member of the Federal Reserve System. Silicon Valley Bank is the California bank subsidiary of SVB Financial Group (Nasdaq: SIVB). SVB, SVB FINANCIAL GROUP, SILICON VALLEY BANK, MAKE NEXT HAPPEN NOW and the chevron device are trademarks of SVB Financial Group, used under license.

This material, including without limitation the statistical information herein, is provided for informational purposes only. The material is based in part upon information from third-party sources that we believe to be reliable, but which has not been independently veried by us and, as such, we do not represent that the information is accurate or complete. The information should not be viewed as tax, investment, legal or other advice nor is it to be relied on in making an investment or other decisions. You should obtain relevant and specic professional advice before making any investment decision. Nothing relating to the material should be construed as a solicitation or o�er, or recommendation, to acquire or dispose of any investment or to engage in any other transaction.

Foreign exchange transactions can be highly risky, and losses may occur in short periods of time if there is an adverse movement of exchange rates. Exchange rates can be highly volatile and are impacted by numerous economic, political and social factors, as well as supply and demand and governmental intervention, control and adjustments. Investments in nancial instruments carry signicant risk, including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. Before entering any foreign exchange transaction, you should obtain advice from your own tax, nancial, legal and other advisors, and only make investment decisions on the basis of your own objectives, experience and resources.

Parent Parent

EUR EUR EUR

EUR

EUR

Sub Sub

Customer

EUR

Customer

Tax/repatriation strategy

Incoming/outgoing payment e¨ciencies

Compliance with local legal/regulatory requirements

Desire to establishself-funding entities

Competitivepressures

Such decentralized billing and collecting structures, however, also may result in negative tradeo�s related to foreign currency risk management.

Later-stage companies that currently bill out of stand-alone foreign entities are assessing the benets of US-centralization.

1. Source: Dharmapala, Dhammika, C. Fritz Foley, and Kristin J. Forbes (2009). “Watch what I do, not what I say: The unintended consequences of the Homeland Investment Act”.NBER Working Paper #15023.

2. Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Advisors. Responses from BofAML's 20th Risk Management Survey. Percentages do not add up to 100% since respondents can select morethan one.

3. Source: Bloomberg query (SRCH <Go>).4. Non-USD debt is o�en used to hedge the USD value of retained earnings in foreign subs (i.e. net investment hedging). Thus if cash is repatriated, hedges must be unwound.5. Source: SVB FX Risk Advisory.6. Moody’s Investor Service: $1.3trn, US Joint Committee of Taxation: $2.6trn, Goldman Sachs: $3.1trn, etc.7. According to the 2016 Triennial Central Bank Survey of foreign exchange and OTC derivatives markets published by the Bank of International Settlements.8. Domestic tax rate on repatriated funds was cut to 5.25%, down from 35%.9. According to Bureau of Economic Analysis. $300bn estimate is based on a 5x trailing 5-year average repatriation.10. According to the 2016 Triennial Central Bank Survey of foreign exchange and OTC derivatives markets published by the Bank of International Settlements.11. One other important reason the USD appreciated in 2005: Fed hiked rates 8 times that year.12. Moody's report - "US Non-Financial Companies: Cash pile grows 9.2% to $1.84 trillion; tech extends lead over other sectors”.

5%

0%

-5%

-10%

-15%2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

-9% -14%-5% -3%

5%