21Aumund : firm products presentation

7/27/2019 21Aumund : firm products presentation

1/22

Solutions for modification and upgrade

of existing material handling equipment

in a cement plant

By Peter Mueller / Sebastian Maerz

AUMUND Foerdertechnik GmbH


2/22

W E C O N V E Y Q U A L I T Y

Introduction

Daily Business

Cost Efficiency

Continous Improvement


3/22


Introduction

Cost EfficiencyEquipment requiring high

maintenance efforts?

Expensive spare parts / not

available?

Equipment with poor availability?


4/22


Introduction

Continous ImprovementKiln UpgradeAdditional Production Line

Different Product


5/22


Introduction

Continous ImprovementAdditional Raw Materials / Additives


6/22


Introduction

Continous ImprovementAdditional Clinker Receipt


7/22


Introduction

Continous Improvement

Higher plant output?

New product brands with

different specifications?

Higher / different demands for

certain raw materials?

Changed process specifications?


8/22


Conversion Advantages

30 80% reduced

Investment

Less Dis- &

Reassembly

Newest Technology

Updated Safety

Standard

Lower Maintenance

Costs

Higher Availabilty


9/22


Bucket Elev. Case Study

What is the cost benefit?

Case Study BW-Z

Analysis Cost Structure

Small Version CC 10mLarge Version CC 75m


10/22



Head

Steelwork

Casing

BootSteelwork Tension

Axle comp.

Drive Unit

comp.

Drive Shaftcomp. Chain &

Bucket


11/22



4.2%17.4%Head Steelwork

29.5%11.4%Casing

2,7%13.5%Boot Steelwork

LargeSmallItem

Head

Steelwork

Casing

BootSteelwork

Sample Calculation BW-Z 400/320 CC 10 / 75 m Capacity: 50 / 400 t/h @ 1,3 t/m


12/22


58%

14%

11%

17%

64%

3%

30%

4%

CC 10 m 50 t/h CC 75 m 400 t/h

Cost Portion / Item

Head Steelwork

Casing

Boot Steelwork

Other


Reuse


13/22


58%

42%

64%

36%

CC 10 m 50 t/h CC 75 m 400 t/h

Cost Portion / Item

Casing/Steelwork

Other


Saving


14/22


58% 64%

CC 10 m 50 t/h CC 75 m 400 t/h

Cost Portion / Item

Casing/Steelwork

Other



15/22


Bucket Elev. Case StudyIncrease plus

potential furthersavings

Motor?

Gearbox?

Hubs?

Driveshaft?

Bearings?

.

Tension

Axle comp.

Drive Unit

comp.

Drive Shaftcomp.

4,9 - 7,5 %

12,4 - 20,7 %

1,8 - 5,7 %


16/22



Further Advantages

Cost advantage when

saving one week of

erection time?

Cost impact when

having a higher

availability and less

maintenancenecessary?


17/22


Example of Reference


18/22


Capacity Increase

The Situation:

CC 73.5m

Lift 40 m


19/22


Capacity Increase

The Situation:

7.500 t/day

9.000 t/day

Increase to


20/22


Power supply unit (1) Rotary control switch (2) Error LED / red (3)

Pot ent io meter ( 4) T erm inal str ip (5 )LCD-Display (6) LED fast mode green (7)

Example of Reference


21/22


Current Limitations

noconversionsforgreenfieldprojects


22/22

Solutions for modification and upgrade

of existing equipment in a cement plant

By Peter Mueller / Sebastian Maerz

AUMUND Foerdertechnik GmbH

Documents

21Aumund : firm products presentation