Upload
siddhalife
View
14
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
P
Citation preview
5th TPM National Conference
Session G : Planned Maintenance
Topic :Zero Breakdown
Presentation by
Mr G VinothAsst Manager (Production)
TTK-Pallavaram
5th TPM National Conference Page 21.1
TTK-Pallavaram Zero Breakdown
SUSTAINING ZERO BREAKDOWN
AT
TTK � LIG Ltd.,
[Pallavaram Unit]
By
Mr.G. Vinoth @ Vijayan
Position of the Company within the Industy� Domestic Market : TTK- LIG is the leader with a market
share of 45%.
� Global Branded Market : SSL, our joint venture
partner, is the market leader with a market share of 26%.
The Company� TTK-LIG Ltd. is a 50:50 joint venture between
TTK Group, India and SSL International plc, UK.� Manufacturing and marketing Male Latex condoms.� Factories : Pallavaram (outskirts of Chennai),
Virudhunagar (near Madurai) and Pondicherry(160 kms south of Chennai) with Annual turnover of170 Crores.
5th TPM National Conference Page 21.2
TTK-Pallavaram Zero Breakdown
Milestones1952 : TTK importing and selling Durapac and Durex in India.1963 : LRC (India) Ltd. established; condom manufacturing commenced.1971 : Supply of �Nirodh� condoms to Govt. of India commenced.1976 : Exports commenced � To Russia with love1979 : Launched Kohinoor � the brand leader in India, today.1987 : Vietnam Project executed � The first International turnkey project.2001 : Sales value crosses the Rs.1 billion mark2003 : TPM Excellence Award (2nd category) 2004 : TPM Excellence (2nd category) Consistency Award.
� ISO 9000 / ISO 14000 / ISO 13485� AFNOR (French certification) / DLF (German certification)� SABS (South african beuro of Standards) / HKSI ( Hong kong Safety institute)� CMDCAS (Canadian certification)
Quality Accreditations.
Production Process.
CompoundingNatural latex mixed with vulcanizingchemicals is heated, cooled & sent toDipping
DippingGlass formers are dipped in compounded
latex. A latex film (the condom) is formed on glass former surface. The formers are then dried and the condoms (dried films) are wet stripped subsequently.
PostTreatment
The condoms are washed, dried & cooled. They are then naturally aged for a minimum of 21 days to complete vulcanization by storing them in a room.
ElectronicTesting
Each and every condom is then electronically tested for holes. The good ones are sent to Foiling.
Foiling The good condoms received from ET are foiled between two layers of laminates, with a lubricant.
The foiled condoms are packed as per customer�s specifications & dispatched
Wash
Dry
Washtumbler
Centrifuge
DrytumblerCooling table
5th TPM National Conference Page 21.3
TTK-Pallavaram Zero Breakdown
Approach - Nakona San�s Concept of Zero Breakdown
Degree of deterioration
TBM
Breakdown
Forced deterioration
Life extended 1JH
Life extended 2
Kaizen on weaknesses(CM)
Restoration
Standard
Limit line
Time
Predictive maintenance
(measurem
ent diagnosis of deterioration)
InspectionForecast
Methodology
Support Activities for Jishu Hozen
Prevention of Recurrence of breakdown
Preparation and Implementation of Time
Based Maintenance
Condition Based Maintenance
Reduction of Maintenance Cost
Activities for Elimination of Breakdown
5th TPM National Conference Page 21.4
TTK-Pallavaram Zero Breakdown
Support To Jishu Hozen : Find all the causes of forced deterioration and restore and improve(Kaizen)
Natural deterioration
Forced Deterioration
Time
Degree of deterioration
Natural deterioration
Forced Deterioration
Time
Degree of deterioration
Step 1 Red Tag Removal Plan and Correcting abnormalities
Implementing Counter measures against Hard to Access areas and
source of Contamination
Preparation of Tentative Standards for CLIRt.
Preparation of General Inspection training material and training the
circle leaders.
Preparation of Autonomous Inspection standards for JH
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
Step 5
Support To Jishu Hozen � Step 1Red Tag Removal Plan and Correcting abnormalities
Sl No. Plant
Tag No.. Date Assembly Part
Physical phenomena
Founded by
Counter Measure
Target Date
Responsible Consquences Remarks
1 B 407 28/12/2004 Ist drier Blower Abnormal Noise
Operator Bearing Replaced
07/01/2005 Fitter Quality Completed.
2 C 600 10/09/2004 Main Drive Gear Box Oil Leak Operator Oil seal Replaced
15/09/2004 Fitter Break Down. Completed.
3 D 566 30/08/2004 Stripping R/C Pump Abnormal Noise
Operator Bearing Replaced
30/08/2004 Eletrician Break Down. Completed.
4 E 384 20/11/2004 I st Drier I Drier BoxPlug & Socket Loose
OperatorPlug & Socket Tightned
20/11/2004 Eletrician Quality &Safety Completed.
5 G 332 19/10/2004 Stripping R/C Pump Water Leak Operator Seal Replaced.
20/10/2004 Fitter Break Down. Completed.
6 H 400 20/08/2004 Main Drive Coupling Spider Loose Fitter Seal Replaced.
20/08/2004 Fitter Break Down. Completed.
Tag Register
Red Tag Status [ Cumulative ]
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
Nos
Put -R 2597 3854 4252 5731 5980 6064 6083 6102 6313 6358Rem -R 2593 3792 4217 5774 5972 6059 6079 6098 6300 6355
2000 2001 2002 2003 H104 Q304 O 04 N04 D04 J05 F05 M05
5th TPM National Conference Page 21.5
TTK-Pallavaram Zero Breakdown
Implementing Counter measures against Hard to Access areas and source of Contamination
Support To Jishu Hozen � Step 2
Before AfterTray provided for easy
cleaning the track chain dirtCleaning the track
chain dirt was difficult before.
Before After
Easy Cleaning of Drive End
Department Hard to
access
Source of Contamination
Compounding 8 5 Dipping 10 11 Post Treatment 5 5 Electronic Testing 13 2 Foiling 8 9
Summary of HTA / SOC
Support To Jishu Hozen � Step 3Preparation of Tentative Standards for CLIRt.
Visual for pump on / off / trip in Dipping
Visual for shaft rotation in Dipping
Visual for Low pressureDipping
Visual for Dipper Temperature Dipping
5th TPM National Conference Page 21.6
TTK-Pallavaram Zero Breakdown
Red Tag Status [ Cumulative ]
0
1000
2000
3000
4000Nos
Put -R 872 1564 2148 2597 2714 2887 2926Rem -R 872 1564 2148 2597 2713 2884 2926
Q 1'00 Q 2'00 Q 3'00 Q 4'00 Q 1'01 Q 2'01 Q 3'01
Poor Basic Condition
Restoration [Red Tag]
Breakdown - Companywide
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70N o s.
Nos / Mt h. 64 52 45 36 32 27 23 19
Dec'99 Q1'00 Q2'00 Q3'00 Q4'00 Q1'01 Q2'01 Q3'01
Prevention of Recurrence of Breakdown
Understand the Present Condition
Analysis � Root Cause Analysis
Classification of Causes
Poor Basic Condition
Lack of Periodical Inspection /
Replacement
Weak Design
Poor Knowledge / Skill
Restoration [Red Tag]
KaizenOne Point Lesson
JH Inspection Std. / TBM
Preventive Action
5th TPM National Conference Page 21.7
TTK-Pallavaram Zero Breakdown
Under Stand the Present Condition Status As of 1999
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q41 Stripping jet blockage 2 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 02 R/C pump not running 15 16 20 22 21 6 4 1 03 Wash Brush not rotating 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 14 Dipper 1 Agitator not rotating 8 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 05 Dipper Agitator Blade not running 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 Drier 1 heater open / cut 6 9 10 11 12 3 0 1 07 Dipper 2 Agitator not rotating 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 08 Drier 2 heater open / cut 3 1 2 4 2 2 0 1 09 Beading Brush not rotating 4 8 3 0 0 0 2 2 110 Contra belt not running 3 4 6 5 6 1 0 0 011 FDE curve broken 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 012 Triplex chain cut off 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 013 Track micromaster - no output 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 114 Vulc heater open / cut 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 015 Former breakage 12 2 5 13 15 7 9 14 016 MCB / OLR - tripped / open 8 0 5 0 1 0 4 0 0
1999Physical PhenomenaSl.No
20012000
Dipping Line
No.of Glass Moulds � 2040Operating 24 hrs & 360 Days
No.of Machines - 11
Total Phenomenon - 39
Analysis
512 Why Why�s
TPM ONE �POINT LESSON No. PM 005
Date of Preparation
05.02.2000
Them
e
To Know How to tighten the bolt
with Washer Dept.
Manager Super- visor
Circle leader Prepared by
Basic Knowledge
Improvement Cases
Trouble Cases C
lass
ifi-
catio
n
N. G K. A KA K. A
Date Executed
05.02.2000
06.02.2000
05.02.2000
05.02.2000
06.02.2000
06.02.2000
05.02.2000
06.02.2000
06.02.2000
06.02.2000
Teacher KA KA KA KA KA KA KA KA KA KA
Act
ual R
esul
ts
Student BSK RS SC AK RK BK BSK KSR VSR VK
Motor Base
Foundation Base
Motor Base
Foundation Base
5th TPM National Conference Page 21.8
TTK-Pallavaram Zero Breakdown
Classification of Causes based on Why Why Analysis
Classification of Causes
Poor Basic Condition
Lack of Periodical Inspection /
Replacement
Weak Design
Poor Knowledge / Skill
Restoration [Red Tag]
KaizenOne Point Lesson
JH Inspection Std. / TBM
JH JH / PME&T KK / PM
Poor Knowledge / Skill
One Point Lesson
Classification of Causes
OPL Trend
0
100200
300
400
500600
700Nos.
Nos. 42 226 302 413 531 646
D99 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
5th TPM National Conference Page 21.9
TTK-Pallavaram Zero Breakdown
Weak Design
Kaizen
Classification of Causes
Problem/present status : Countermeasure : By changing the pitch of Triplex Main drive - Side View Main Drive - Top View chain from 1/2 " to 3/4 ".
1/2 " Triplex Chain 3/4 " Triplex Chain
Analysis :
Root cause: Weak DesignDesign
Triplex Chain link is of 1/2 " pitch
Results :
Triplex Chain links not able to withstand the load
Triplex Chain breaks down 6 times / month Triplex Chain Breakdown
0
2
4
6
8Nos./Mth
Nos/Mth 6 0
Before After
Better
Theme 1 : Elimination of Triplex Chain Breakdown
Weak Design
Kaizen
Classification of Causes
SPRING ASSEMBLY
U - Clamp
Bush
Spindle
Brass Block
Torsional Springs
Holder
Theme 2 : To reduce stress on Torsional Spring
331Kaizens
5th TPM National Conference Page 21.10
TTK-Pallavaram Zero Breakdown
Type of spring Torsional SpringLocation of usage Clamp Assembly in Dipping LineDia. of the wire 1.5 mmNo. of Coil 7Nominal dia. of spring 24.5 mmLocation of Mounting Hook ParallelPosition of Mounting Right AngleMaterial of Construction Stainless Steel - Spring GradeYoung Modulus nof the material 2.16 x 105 N / mm²Ultimate bending stress of Spring 935 N / mm²
Initial Stress on the Spring 494.49 N / mm²( When Loading with Clamp )Working Stress on the Spring 989 N / mm²Swinging 0 to 90° ( i.e. 180° - Total twisting angle of spring )
Stress Analysis of Torsional Spring - Before
OLD SPRING - LOADED
OLD SPRING - UNLOADED
Initial Stress494.5 N/mm²
Swing Angle -0°
Swing Angle -90°
Theme: To reduce the initial Load on torsional spring
Results :Initial Stress reduced due to hook
modification
494.49
330
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
Be for e After
N / mm ²
Bet ter
30°
B efore Counte rme asure : By changing the spring hook angle Torsional springs are used in clamp assembly with Afterinitial twisting of 90° from normal condition. Initial twisting angle reduced to 60°
B e n e f i t s :
P r o d u c t io n in c r e a s e d= 1 3 8 0 0 p c s . / m c . /
m o n th
Analysis :
Root Cause : Higher working stress Design
Clamp replacement high
Spring life less
Spring gets over stressed
Working stress on the spring is higher than allowable stress
33 %
Results :Initial Stress reduced due to hook
modification
494.49
330
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
Be for e After
N / mm ²
Bet ter
30°30°
B efore Counte rme asure : By changing the spring hook angle Torsional springs are used in clamp assembly with Afterinitial twisting of 90° from normal condition. Initial twisting angle reduced to 60°
B e n e f i t s :
P r o d u c t io n in c r e a s e d= 1 3 8 0 0 p c s . / m c . /
m o n th
Analysis :
Root Cause : Higher working stress Design
Clamp replacement high
Spring life less
Spring gets over stressed
Working stress on the spring is higher than allowable stress
33 %
5th TPM National Conference Page 21.11
TTK-Pallavaram Zero Breakdown
Theme: To reduce the Working Load on torsional spring
Before Countermeasure : By changing the curve angleTorsional springs are used in clamp assembly to Afterswing the former from 0° to 90° and hold in 0° Reducing the Swinging angle by 40° ( i.e.from 0° toin dipper and leach tank 50° of swinging angle ) and hold the former in 0° in
dipper and leach tank by altering the former travellingguide.
Analysis : Benefits :
= 6900 pcs. / mc. /month
Spring swings the formers from 0° to 90° and vice versa
Root Cause : Higher swinging angleDesign
Theme: To reduce the Working stress on the torsional spring
No. of clamp replacement high
Springs get Over stressed
Production increased
Results :Working Stress reduced due to curve
modification494.49
275
200250300350400450500550
Before After
N / mm²
Better
Angle change from 0 ° - 90 ° - 0°Angle change smoothen from 0° - 50 ° - 0°
42 %
90°50°
Before Countermeasure : By changing the curve angleTorsional springs are used in clamp assembly to Afterswing the former from 0° to 90° and hold in 0° Reducing the Swinging angle by 40° ( i.e.from 0° toin dipper and leach tank 50° of swinging angle ) and hold the former in 0° in
dipper and leach tank by altering the former travellingguide.
Analysis : Benefits :
= 6900 pcs. / mc. /month
Spring swings the formers from 0° to 90° and vice versa
Root Cause : Higher swinging angleDesign
Theme: To reduce the Working stress on the torsional spring
No. of clamp replacement high
Springs get Over stressed
Production increased
Results :Working Stress reduced due to curve
modification494.49
275
200250300350400450500550
Before After
N / mm²
Better
Angle change from 0 ° - 90 ° - 0°Angle change smoothen from 0° - 50 ° - 0°
42 %
90°90°50°
Type of spring Before AfterLocation of usageDia. of the wireNo. of CoilNominal dia. of springLocation of Mounting HookPosition of Mounting 90° 60°Material of ConstructionYoung's Modulus of the material 2.16 x 105 N / mm ² 2.16 x 105 N / mm ²Allowable bending stress of Spring 935 N / mm ² 935 N / mm ²
Initial Stress on the Spring( When Loading with Clamp )Working Stress on the SpringSwinging 0 to 50° ( i.e. 110° - total twist of spring )
1.5 mmClamp Assembly in Dipping Line
330 N / mm ²
Parallel24.5 mm7
605 N / mm ²
494.49 N / mm ²
989 N / mm ²
Stainless Steel - Spring Grade
Stress Analysis of Torsional Spring - After
NEW SPRING - LOADED
NEW SPRING - UNLOADED
Initial Stress330 N/mm²
Swing Angle -0°
Swing Angle -60°
5th TPM National Conference Page 21.12
TTK-Pallavaram Zero Breakdown
TBM
TBM
ForcedDeterioration
Time
Kaizen on weaknesses(CM)
Natural DeteriorationParts replaced though still useful
Severe wear but change before breakdown
Parts Not replaced before failure
Change parts on schedule Limit Line
* Tendency to replace at greater frequency is expensive
TBM
TBM
ForcedDeterioration
Time
Kaizen on weaknesses(CM)
Natural DeteriorationParts replaced though still useful
Severe wear but change before breakdown
Parts Not replaced before failure
Change parts on schedule Limit Line
* Tendency to replace at greater frequency is expensive
Lack of Periodical Inspection /
Replacement
Time Based Maintenance
Classification of Causes
TBM Calendar
TBM Checklist
Inspection Standard - JH
Physical Phenomenon Analysis - Status As of 2002
Dipping Line
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q41 Stripping jet blockage 2 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 R/C pump not running 15 16 20 22 21 6 4 1 0 1 1 0 03 Wash Brush not rotating 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 04 Dipper 1 Agitator not rotating 8 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 05 Dipper Agitator Blade not running 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 06 Drier 1 heater open / cut 6 9 10 11 12 3 0 1 0 1 2 0 07 Dipper 2 Agitator not rotating 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08 Drier 2 heater open / cut 3 1 2 4 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 09 Beading Brush not rotating 4 8 3 0 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 010 Contra belt not running 3 4 6 5 6 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 011 FDE curve broken 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 012 Triplex chain cut off 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 013 Track micromaster - no output 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 014 Vulc heater open / cut 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 015 Former breakage 12 2 5 13 15 7 9 14 0 0 1 0 016 MCB / OLR - tripped / open 8 0 5 0 1 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0
1999Physical PhenomenaSl.No
200220012000
Total Phenomenon - 39Phenomenon Eliminated - 39
5th TPM National Conference Page 21.13
TTK-Pallavaram Zero Breakdown
Breakdown - Dipping
0
10
20
30
40
50N o s.
N o s / M t h. 3 9 3 0 2 6 2 2 2 0 19 16 13 11 10 6 2 0 0 0
D ec'9
Q1'0 0
Q2 '0 0
Q3 '0 0
Q4 '0 0
Q1'0 1
Q2 '0 1
Q3 '0 1
Q4 '0 1
Q1'0 2
Q2 '0 2
Q3 '0 2
Q4 '0 2
Q1'0 3
Q2 '0 3
B etter
T arget - Z ero
Achieved Zero
BreakdownIn Q2�2003
Breakdown - Electronic Testing
0
2
4
6
8N o s.
N o s / M t h. 6 6 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 3 3 2 1 1 0 0
D ec' 9
Q1'0 0
Q2' 0
Q3' 0
Q4' 0
Q1'0 1
Q2' 0 1
Q3' 0 1
Q4' 0 1
Q1'0 2
Q2' 0
Q3' 0
Q4' 0
Q1'0 3
Q2' 0
Q3' 0
B et ter
T arget - Z ero
Breakdown - Foiling
0
5
10
15
20N o s.
N os / M t h. 19 16 14 9 7 4 3 2 0 0 0
D ec'9 9
Q1'00
Q2 '00
Q3 '00
Q4 '00
Q1'01
Q2 '01
Q3 '01
Q4 '01
Q10 2 Q2 02
B etter
T arge t - Z ero
Breakdown Vs Kaizens - Companywide
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70N o s.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350N o s.
Nos / Mth. 64 52 45 36 32 27 23 19 15 13 9 4 1 0 0 0
Kaizens 24 56 84 115 124 142 164 194 209 231 249 271 292 317 324 331
Dec'99 Q1'00 Q2'00 Q3'00 Q4'00 Q1'01 Q2'01 Q3'01 Q4'01 Q1'02 Q2'02 Q3'02 Q4'02 Q1'03 Q2'03 Q2'04
Preventive ActionM/c. /LineNo.
1 F Agitator - 1 Agitator not rotating Latex entered Bearing Agitator bearing blockinto the bearing replaced height elevated by 20
mm and included shaftcleaning during dipperstaining - JH
2 H Beading brush - 1 Beading brush Motor terminal Retightened Included in thenot rotating block wire loose Inspection Schedule - PM
3 X & Arms Arms lifted Hylum guide found Hylum guide Hylum guidespringY broken and positioning replaced replaced included in
spring lost its tension TBMschedule-Yearly - PM4 Y Carousel Tank Tank not rotating Inside of drum Steel balls Included in
steel balls struck replaced TBM Schedule - PM5 C Dehumidifier Dehumidifer not Desicant bed Screw replaced Screw replaced instead of
working rivet broken rivetand Limitswitch position altered toavoid rubbing on the rivet /screw - PM
6 G U - Clamp Track not moving Clamp loosened Washer replaced Training given to the fittersdue to spring washer and tightened on the importance of themissed spring washers in theU -
Clamp assembly - E&T
Sl No
Component Physical Phenomena Root Cause Corrective Action
Preventive Action / Inspection
5th TPM National Conference Page 21.14
TTK-Pallavaram Zero Breakdown
SUSTENANCE
OF
ZERO BREAKDOWN
Sustenance of Zero BreakdownAchieve Zero
Breakdown by thorough analysis
of Breakdown
Proactive measures to prevent recurrence of breakdown
Breakdown
Analysis
Counter measure / Kaizen
Check the result
Horizontal deployment
Identify critical components
Identify Potential causes &
Conditions
Inspect & take Counter measure
Check the result
Practising TBM
Collection of replaced Parts
Analyse & identify weakness
Implement Kaizen / Countermeasure
Preventive measures � Revise Inspection & TBM standards
Support to Jishu Hozen in making
the operator -Equipment competent
CBM
5th TPM National Conference Page 21.15
TTK-Pallavaram Zero Breakdown
Support To Jishu Hozen
Natural deterioration
Forced Deterioration
Time
Degree of deterioration
Natural deterioration
Forced Deterioration
Time
Degree of deterioration
Step 1 Red Tag Removal Plan and Correcting abnormalities
Implementing Counter measures against Hard to Access areas and
source of Contamination
Preparation of Tentative Standards for CLIRt.
Preparation of General Inspection training material and training the
circle leaders.
Preparation of Autonomous Inspection standards for JH
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
Step 5
Support To Jishu Hozen � Step 4Preparation of General Inspection training material and training the circle
leaders.
Training to Circle Leaders
Beading Unit
Training to Circle members
5th TPM National Conference Page 21.16
TTK-Pallavaram Zero Breakdown
Support To Jishu Hozen � Step 5Preparation of Autonomous Inspection standards
Potential Cause Analysis
Physical Phenomena
Critical Parts
Potential Cause
How to check
What to do -if not okay Preventive Action
1 Main DriveWorn outCrack on JointsBlow holes
Alignment Misalignment Check Parallality
Align the Sprockets
Skewness Misalignment Check Faceout
Align the Sprockets
Micromaster - no output
Electronic Components
Life unpredictable
Check the Electrical connection
Replace by new one
Replace once in 5 Years.
Sprocket dislocation
Locking Screw
Screw tip damaged
Check the locking tip
Replace the screw
Replace the Screw whenever removed
2 Former Assy.
Former breakage Clamp Spring Sticky of Clamp
Visually check the Spring
Replace the clamp with new spring
Clamp assembly to be modified
Drive chain cut
a. Aligned the Sprocket b. Match the fixing bolts with tight mark c. Trained the fitters on alignment
Chain & Sprockets
Sl.No
FDE curve broken
Welded Joint Check Joints Visually
Grind and Reweld
a. Before welding, ends to be chamfered. b. Trained the welder
Main Drive of Dipping Line
5th TPM National Conference Page 21.17
TTK-Pallavaram Zero Breakdown
Revision of PM Standard
Actions to overcome the inherent weaknesses.
Before AfterDepartment : Dipping
Contra Rotation Gear Box
Contra drive needs 1 Amps. i.e., 0.5 HP Drive and A - 112 Gear box not withstand the Drive Load
Change from A -112 Model to A - 162 Model 45 Days One year
Stripping Area
Recycling Pump
Operating at higher voltage ( 240 - 250 V ) and starting current also high
Converted to Three phase from Single phase
3 Months One year
Main Drive Triplex Chain
Drive needs to be strengthened alongwith other modifications in the dipping line
Converted to 3/4" Pitch from 1/2" Pitch 3 Months Two years
Contra Rotation
Drive and Driven pulley shaft
Shaft material is softConverted the Shaft material to EN - 8 from Stainless Steel
Monthly Six Months
Contra Rotation Belt Guide
Teflon guide wearsout causing belt slippage
Changed from Teflon to Cast Nylon 3 Months Two years
Contra Rotation Flat belt 2mm Belt looses its tension
Changed from 2 mm thick to 3.2 mm thick belt 45 Days Six Months
Contra Rotation
Driven Shaft Supporting Bearing
More Alignment time due to the shaft supported by Individual Bearings
Replaced the Pillow block bearings to bearing housing with double bearing
20 Mins. to adjust / align
5 Mins. to adjust / align
Station Component Weakness control measures Identified the weakness control
Life
Beading Station of Dipping Lines
5th TPM National Conference Page 21.18
TTK-Pallavaram Zero Breakdown
Failure Mode and Effect analysis
Sub System Component Function Functional
Failure Failure mode Occurance A
Impact B
RestorationC
Detection Degree D
Scoring Criteria
AxBxCxDEffect of Failure Proposed Task
Beading System
Winding open, Drawing high current, Single Phasing
Condition Monitoring through Tong Tester - for working current - Every month
Hamming noise, Tripped off
Inspect the OLR setting before restart after any shutdown
Over Heat Inspect the fan blade during shutdown, Clean the motor body finns
Over bearing noise Following Time based maintenance - once in three years
Oil Seal Damaged, Noise
Following Time based maintenance - once in three years
Worn out of hylum Gears Following Time based maintenance - once in six months.
Misalignment Inspect the alignement during shutdown
Slippage of key & locking screw, wornout of bore and teeth,
Visual check during any shutdown, Alignment to be checked whenever Sprocket, Chain, Gear box & Driven shaft replaced / serviced
Misalignment Training of technicians on mounting and dismounting on opportunity
Key To integrate Sprocket with shaft
Unable to integrate
Looseness, Shear, Crush 1 5 1 2 10
Refitting - 15 mins. hrs down time, replacement & alignment. Production Loss of 3750 Pcs & Product scrap 1000 Pcs.
Check the key, keyway and Fitness whenever refitted
101 5 1 2
1 4 60
Servicing and replacement of Geared Motor time - 120
Mins. i.e., 1000 Pcs. Product scrap & 27000 Pcs.
Production loss
5 3
Failure Mode & Effect Analysis - Automatic Plant ( Sub System - Beading System )
Replacement & alignment time - 15 Mins. i.e., 1000
Pcs. Product scrap & 3750 Pcs. Production loss
Unable to transmit
To ensure the transmission of drive
Drive Sprocket
Unable to drive the beading brush
To ensure the drive the beading brush
Geared Motor
Theme: To Increase the Mean time between TouchCounter Measure; By Changing the Hylum gear drive to metal gear drive
Before After
ResultsAnalysis:Production Loss is high.
Time for replacement of Gears is high.
Wear out of Gears
Gear are made of hylum ( soft material ).
Design.Root Cause: Hylum Gears.
Geared Motor is used to drive beadingbrushes to form beads on the Product. The Gears are made of both Metal & Hylum sheets.
Gears in the Geared motor is changed with Metal Gears.
L ife of G ear - Increased in M TB T
0
5
1 0
1 5
2 0
2 5
3 0M o nths
M o nth 6 2 4
B e fo re E xpe cte d L ife
B e tte r
D ri ve S h a ft
D ri ve n S h a ft
H yl u m G e a rs
M e ta ll ic G e a rs
D r i v e S h a f t
D r i v e n S h a f t
M e ta l l i c G e a r s
Theme: To Increase the Mean time between TouchCounter Measure; By Changing the Hylum gear drive to metal gear drive
Before After
ResultsAnalysis:Production Loss is high.
Time for replacement of Gears is high.
Wear out of Gears
Gear are made of hylum ( soft material ).
Design.Root Cause: Hylum Gears.
Geared Motor is used to drive beadingbrushes to form beads on the Product. The Gears are made of both Metal & Hylum sheets.
Gears in the Geared motor is changed with Metal Gears.
L ife of G ear - Increased in M TB T
0
5
1 0
1 5
2 0
2 5
3 0M o nths
M o nth 6 2 4
B e fo re E xpe cte d L ife
B e tte r
D ri ve S h a ft
D ri ve n S h a ft
H yl u m G e a rs
M e ta ll ic G e a rs
D r i v e S h a f t
D r i v e n S h a f t
M e ta l l i c G e a r s
5th TPM National Conference Page 21.19
TTK-Pallavaram Zero Breakdown
PM Matrix
Component Categorisation
System Sub Assembly Platinum Gold Silver Bronze Component Platinum Gold Silver BronzeDrive System 10 3 3 4 40 22 6 8 4Beading 38 8 15 5 10 105 45 20 22 18Drier 8 2 4 2 32 7 12 5 8Dipper 12 3 1 5 3 44 2 8 24 10Dry Brush 18 8 1 3 6 48 18 9 18 3Product Stripping 8 1 3 4 20 9 3 4 4Track Chain 6 2 4 24 12 4 6 2
Total 100 20 25 22 33 313 115 62 87 49
MTTR - Sub Assembly MTBF - ComponentCatagorisation of PM Components - Before
System Sub Assembly Platinum Gold Silver Bronze Component Platinum Gold Silver BronzeDrive System 10 6 4 40 29 5 6 0Beading 38 10 28 105 62 28 7 8Drier 8 8 32 13 14 3 2Dipper 12 6 6 44 15 19 4 6Dry Brush 18 9 9 48 24 13 11 0Product Stripping 8 2 5 1 20 11 6 1 2Track Chain 6 2 4 24 18 5 1 0
Total 100 27 62 7 4 313 172 90 33 18
Catagorisation of PM Components - AfterMTBF - ComponentMTTR - Sub Assembly
Period CategoryMore than 1 Year PlatinumMore than 6 Months GoldMore than 3 Months SilverMonthly or Less Bronze
Period CategoryLess than 10 min PlatinumLess than 90 min GoldLess than 240 min SilverMore than 240 min Bronze
MTBF - Componentwise
MTTR - Subassemblywise
26 % Increase in
MTTR Platinum
33 % Increase in
MTBF Platinum
5th TPM National Conference Page 21.20
TTK-Pallavaram Zero Breakdown
Condition Based MonitoringTBM
TBM
ForcedDeterioration
Time
Kaizen on weaknesses(CM)
Natural DeteriorationParts replaced though still useful
Severe wear but change before breakdown
Parts Not replaced before failure
Change parts on schedule Limit Line
* Tendency to replace at greater frequency is expensive
TBM
TBM
ForcedDeterioration
Time
Kaizen on weaknesses(CM)
Natural DeteriorationParts replaced though still useful
Severe wear but change before breakdown
Parts Not replaced before failure
Change parts on schedule Limit Line
* Tendency to replace at greater frequency is expensive
CBM
Time
Limit Line
ForcedDeterioration
Kaizen onweaknesses(CM)
NaturalDeterioration
Prediction
Standard
Inspection
Standard Values can be set near the limitlime if the diagnosis is reliable
To check the workingcondition
To check theCondition of
Bearing
To check the Voltagedrop
To Scan the surfacetemp. of Former
To check the LengthVariation
Condition Based Maintenance - Mapping in Dipping Lines
5th TPM National Conference Page 21.21
TTK-Pallavaram Zero Breakdown
Results
Breakdown Downtime vs Production Loss - Dipping
0
10
20
30
40
Numbers
Nos . 39 34 27 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mins. 11040 7445 6605.5 481.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pcs. 1E+06 804060 713394 519 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Target 30 20 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1999 2000 2001 2002 200 3 H104 Q304 O'04 N'04 D'04 J'05 F'05 M'05 A'05-S'05
O'05-M'06
Better
Breakdown Downtime vs Production Loss - Electronic Testing
0
1
2
3
4
5
Numbers
No s . 2 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mins . 1275 1885 240 220 30 0 0 0 0 0 0
P cs . 45900 67860 8640 7920 1080 0 0 0 0 0 0
Target 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 H104 Q304 O'04 N'04 D'04 J '05 F '05 M'05 A'05-S'05
O'05-M'06
Better
Breakdown Downtime vs Production Loss - Foiling
0
5
10
15
20
Numbers
No s . 19 12 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mins . 3410 2694 713 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P cs . 163680 129312 34224 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Target 15 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 H104 Q304 O'04 N'04 D'04 J '05 F'05 M'05A'05-S '05
O'05-M'06
Better
Breakdown Trend
Sustaining Zero Breakdown for 22
Months
Breakdown - Company WIde
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Num bers
No s . 60 49 36 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ta rge t 45 30 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 H104 Q304 O'04 N'04 D'04 J '05 F '05 M '05 A'05-S '05
O'05-M '06
Better
126 Equipments