Upload
rosaline-cross
View
220
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
21ST Century Community Learning Centers
Before- and After-School Summer Expansion Grant
(21st CCLC Summer Expansion)
Technical Assistance WebinarMarch 25, 2011
Michigan Department of Education
Office of Early Childhood Education
and Family Services
Introduction
• Supported through Michigan Legislature
• $3 Million Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)
• Interagency Agreement between Michigan Department of Human Services/Children’s Trust Fund and Michigan Department of Education
• Pilot Summer Expansion from June 6, 2011-September 2, 2011.
• Academic Enrichment– Expansion of last year’s summer
academic programming – Using hands-on, active learning model
• Tutorial Services– Reading– Mathematics
21st CCLC Summer Expansion Objectives
21st CCLC Summer Expansion Objectives
• Additional Services – youth development activities – drug and violence prevention programs– counseling programs – personal safety – internet safety – art and music – nutrition – recreation programs – technology and vocational education programs – character education programs
21st CCLC Summer Expansion Objectives
• Families Services – literacy – household budgeting programs – GED completion assistance – career guidance and related
educational development
Eligible Applicants
• Current 21st CCLC grantees• Funds may be used only for students
entering grades K-9• Sites must have current license• Maximum of five sites per application
– Use current 21st CCLC project number
Funding Range
• Maximum grant award $45,000 per site
• Maximum of five sites per application
Application Review Process
• Grant reviewers needed – Reader Session, April 25• Scored according to rubrics• Maximum score 100 points• Individual review
– inter-rater reliability– team consensus
• Rank order according to score• Additional factors may apply
– evidence of previous successful grant performance
– non-duplication of service/supplement vs. supplant– geographical distribution
Cover of Application
• Identify applicant organization
• Complete all requested information
• List the sites to be expanded– Group by current 21st CCLC project
number
• Original signature of applicant’s authorized official in blue ink on original application
Assurances
• Original signature in blue ink on original
• Affirms that applicant will comply with all requirements
• Binding contract
Project Abstract
• 5 points
• Rubric page 8
• Used to provide brief information about the project
• Often copied to represent the project to the public
• Use 3rd person
• Do NOT say “see attached”
Narrative Proposal
• Narrative Proposal = 85 points – Narrative Summary – 50 points
– Project Plan - 20 points
– Facility Description - 5 points
– Program Personnel - 10 points
• “Heart of the Proposal”
• Narrative summary (2 pages per site, maximum of 10)
• Project Plan sheets (as many as needed)
• Complete, thorough plan, including a minimum of four (4) items of the goals listed on page 12
Narrative Summary
• 50 points
• Rubrics on pages 9-11
• Four Sections
– Expansion
– Description of Services
– Parent Involvement and Family Function
– Community Collaboration
Narrative Summary
• Expansion– Add students– Add hours and/or days and/or weeks– Add services
Narrative Summary
• Description of Services– Academic enrichment– Youth development, drug and violence
prevention, pregnancy prevention, character education and counseling
– Recreation, sports, art, music and technology
– Number of students, hours of operation, unique features and operational information
Narrative Summary
• Parent Involvement and Family Function– Describes opportunities and services to
families to meet the needs for the community
– Describes parent involvement including planning, implementation, program evaluation, and on-going policy and advisory roles
Narrative Summary
• Community Collaboration
– Describe services to community supports and links
– Describe community involvement including planning, implementation, program evaluation, and on-going policy and advisory roles
Project Plan
• 20 points
• Rubric on page 12
• Complete Part C, page 3
• Goals– Minimum of four (4)
Goals• Required to target and evaluate at least 4 of the
identified goals:– Reduction in juvenile violence and gang related
activities– Reduction in aggressive behavior and bullying– Increase in academic achievement– Improved summer attendance and reduced dropout
rates from summer program– Increase drug and alcohol prevention awareness– Increase abstinence-based pregnancy prevention– Increase development of new skills and interests
Goals• Required to target and evaluate at least 4 of the
identified goals, cont.:– Increase positive behavioral changes in school and the
community– Increase safety awareness– Provide first aid and health education– Increase nutritional awareness– Provide job skills– Increase leadership skills– Provide parental involvement and improved family
functioning– Increase preparedness for self sufficiency– Provide community collaboration and links to other
community supports
Facility Plan
• 5 points
• Rubric on page 13 of instructions
• Complete Part D, page 4
• P.A. 116 - licensing
http://www.michigan.gov/dhslicensing
• Must include copy of current license
• Sites appropriate for activities
Program Personnel
• 10 points
• Rubric on page 14 of instructions
• Compliance with Child Day Care Licensing Rules
Budget
• 10 points • Rubric on page 17 of instructions• Funding period: June 6, 2011 –
September 2, 2011• Three parts: summary, detail, and
narrative• Appropriate, cost-effective,
expenditures for planned expansion• Maximum request $45,000/site
Budget
• Administration capped at 10% of request – Total of lines 230, 240, 250, 260 and 280, plus
indirect costs – does not include rent of a facility not owned by
applicant or partners
• Faith Based, Community Organizations – may not charge directly for administrative costs – Do not use lines 230, 240, 250, 260– use 10% maximum for indirect costs if no negotiated
indirect rate
• Use line 280 for evaluation only– does not count in 10% administration cap
Budget
• Use negotiated indirect rate, if available
• Signatures in blue ink on original application
• Allowed/not allowed
Monitoring Responsibilities and Performance Reporting
• On-site Monitoring
• Statewide Evaluation– MSU Instruments– EZreports
• Local Evaluation– Program quality– Specific targets/goals– Qualitative and quantitative– Staff evaluation, student and parent satisfaction,
curriculum and environment evaluation
Evaluation Overview• MSU will conduct the state evaluation
– Provide end-of-grant statewide report– To do so, MSU needs to summarize data across
grantees on the selected goals– Some goals are easier to measure than others
• These points about evaluation cover only summer program for students enrolled as part of the expansion:– If new services/hours, MSU will use EZreports to identify
students participating in those services or at those hours– If new population (e.g., new grade), MSU will use
EZreports to identify students meeting the population definition
Evaluation Overview, Cont.
• Local evaluator is required: Primary function is to assist in meeting data collection goals and ensuring data quality
• Next two slides show easiest way to collect data for each goal within current processes
• Grantees are not required to follow these suggestions, but it would be easiest under the short timeline
Goal
Suggested Evaluation
MethodExtra Effort Required by
Grantees
Improved summer attendance and reduced dropout rates from summer program
EZreports• Nothing except add
activities into EZreports and take attendance as usual
Provide first aid/health education
Provide parental involvement and improved family functioning
Increase abstinence-based pregnancy prevention
Increase drug and alcohol prevention awareness
Student survey
• Conference call with MSU with grantees around each goal to identify common items for brief survey.
• Copy and administer survey at end of summer program (anonymous, not sent by MSU)
• Send completed surveys to MSU.
Increase development of new skills and interests
Increase positive behavioral changes in school and the community
Increase safety awareness
Increase nutritional awareness
Increase leadership skills
Provide job skills
Increase preparedness for self-sufficiency
GoalSuggested
Evaluation MethodExtra Effort Required by
Grantees
Increase academic achievement
Measure of academic achievement; recommended only if already in place
• Identify academic achievement measure
• Administer to each student at beginning and end of summer program
• Document scores• Send to MSU
Provide community collaboration and links to other community supports
Project Director survey
• MSU administers brief online survey to Project Directors
Reduction in juvenile violence and gang related activities
Not recommendedReduction in aggressive behavior and bullying
Checklist and Packaging
• Include original application, with signatures in blue ink, and 4 copies, for a total of five
• Attach checklist to the top of the original application
• Do not attach supplementary materials
• Do not use special binding
Mailing Directions
• Delivery by agent only• MUST BE Received at MDE by
5 PM, April 13, 2011!!!!• Fax-back confirmation
– If not received by April 14 – CALL US!
– 517-241-4290 – Amanda’s direct line
Important Dates
• Due Date – April 13
• Reader Session – April 25
• Anticipated Grant Announcement Date – May 27
• Orientation Meeting – June 3
• Program Start – June 6
Questions?
Pat Hennessey [email protected] Amanda Stoel [email protected] Taylor [email protected]
Lorraine Thoreson [email protected]
517-373-8483