Upload
leslie-austin
View
216
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
21 Lifestyles, Wellbeing and Energy
Joyashree Roy, Jadavpur University, India.
www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012 2www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012
Options do exist beyond supply side interventions
from consumer perspective
• Ultimate energy use is influenced by a number of factors
• income and affluence • non-economic and non-technological drivers: such as lifestyle, culture, religion, desire
for improved well being, and behavior
• Policies and measures can modify or change lifestyles and preferences
• Notions of well-being that are not based on material consumption alone offers new policy
options
• A reduction in energy services demand does not necessarily reduce well-being
• Life style changes are an effective and powerful approach to addressing sustainability issues, as it can provide better multiple benefits
• better health• low fossil fuel based mobility• lower emissions• nutrition without reducing socio-economic status• adds flexibility to supply side options
www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012 3www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012
Weakening of the income-energy coupling: Already happening
While real global GDP increased by 1.6 times from 1990 to 2007, total primary energy use increased by 1.4 times
Need to look beyond economic drivers: behavioral, lifestyle choices, culture, religion etc.
The chapter explores a more fundamental question of whether defining affluence in purely economic terms is an appropriate measure for well-being.
Referring to well-being also means addressing not only absolute reductions in energy services , which might be an issue for high-income consumers and regions, but also absolute increases in energy services, which are still necessary for a huge percentage of the population in developing countries.
www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012 4www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012
Diet Matters
: A Cultural, religious habit but also ‘acquired’ taste
90% Hindus and Buddhist, 75% Muslims, 16% Jews follow dietary restrictions of religion
: Global transition is toward “more-affluent” food consumption patterns-meat consumption (24% beef) increasing- difference between the energy input for plant- and meat-based meals
may exceed a factor of 10
: in internationally connected world through trade:-Preference for overseas food is changing, seasonal/fresh food is
changing
:Over the past few decades, energy needs for transport, storage, and processing increased in the food sector, especially for meat products.
: In high income countries Food accounts for 17–18% of household indirect energy use
www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012 5www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012
Per Capita Meat Consumption Across Regions
www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012 6www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012
Food: how and from where
www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012 7www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012
Mobility Matters
Vehicle ownership and energy use ? Beijing, Shanghai vis-à-vis Tokyo : less ownership more fuel use. In US both are high, with as high as 65% of global passenger km travelled.
Mobility for accessibility: Living near work place
Walking ,bicycling short distances
Telecommuting increases electricity use but reduces primary energy use
International tourism
Private jet
Socially -More value for individual freedom, private space…, marketing strategy, human settlement design, public transport service status, infrastructure- all matters
www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012 8www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012
Direct and Indirect Energy Use
www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012 9www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012
Possible to Influence preference
Lifestyle choice: extrinsic factor. A decision variable amenable to change
Decision levels : Individual (Consumers undervalue energy saving actions), landscape (culture, value, social norm, environmentalism), macro (infrastructure design, market price, zoning)
• Knowledge-based interventions to increase individual intention to adopt energy use strategies.
• Engaging people requires a constructive response from the community to actual or perceived threats.
• Necessary to show individual consumers or small groups of consumers that any one person or a small group of people can have an enormous impact
• Consumers are important in the design, implementation of public policy and decisions and also as peer monitoring groups.
www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012 10www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012
Role of Policies
Laws regulating individual consumption decisions could be supplementary to strengthen informational impact.
Political will to change energy policy, peoples’ support to take on extra burden
Need to build strong environmentalism
Sufficiency led policy strategy: addressing level of consumption
Driving heavy private cars, eating meat, or traveling by airplane and private jet should be prohibited or restricted?
Not really, sufficiency means consumption with moderation and prudence. Developing awareness of the consequences of actions beyond monetized cost-benefit analysis and of markets beyond local or regional scope.
Change in top-down decisions in infrastructure design and educating communities
www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012 11www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012
Beyond Affluence to Wellbeing
Mono-dimensional: consumer
:determinant of wellbeingrich –poor , Income –
expenditure binary:homogenised life style
choices: low human labour/work: acquired dietary choices
Multi dimensional :consumer
:+constitutents of wellbeing : health, happiness, freedom: more diverse lifestyle choices:walking/ cycling/non-
motorised means of transport
: seasonal, local, cultural, religious dietary choices
www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012 12www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012
Income and Wellbeing Correlation Weaker Beyond a Point
www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012 13www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012
Additional entry point
Reduction in phantom load has potential of reducing 10% of energy bill
Limit of lean meat consumption per year recommended by American Heart Association per capita per year @ 62.6 kg. Currently FAO statistics show 54 countries have percapita annual consumption higher than the standard ranging between 63.2 (Mexico)-122.79 (US).
1.4% of current global primary energy use reduction potential
Healthy mobility has 1.3% of primary use reduction potential
Emerging corporate citizenship practices, donations and gifts for environmental programs, incentives for employees to work with community groups on natural resource conservation and protection, drive information campaign, product labeling, and purchase policies .
www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012 14www.globalenergyassessment.org© GEA 2012
Research Gap
new welfare & well-being measures
link energy use to such alternative measures
efficiency-led strategies need to be tied to sufficiency to become a widely used strategy that changes values and notions of wellbeing
assess the macroeconomic effects of large-scale switches to more-sufficient lifestyles over various time scales in the future.
A key issue is how a large reduction in consumption could be absorbed by the economy without generating large unemployment.
Simultaneous redistribution of labor could offer a solution, but further analysis is clearly needed.
GEA Chapter 21 authors
Coordinating Lead Author:
Joyashree Roy (Jadavpur University , India)
Lead Authors:
Anne-Maree Dowd (CSIRO)Adrian Müller (University of Zurich)Shamik Pal (Institute of Engineering and Management)Ndola Prata (University of California, Berkeley)
Review Editor :
Sylvie Lemmet (UNEP)