32
2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments January 12, 2021 1

2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments

2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments

January 12, 2021

1

Page 2: 2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments

• Understanding the Budget Challenge

• Explain Recommended Budget Adjustments

• Next Steps and Timeline

Overview

2

Page 3: 2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments

OUR VISIONAll OUSD students will find joy in their academic experience while graduating with the skills to ensure they are caring, competent, fully-informed, critical thinkers who are prepared for college, career, and community success.

OUR MISSIONOUSD will build a Full Service Community District focused on high academic achievement while serving the whole child, eliminating inequity, and providing each child with excellent teachers, every day.

3

All our adjustments seek to preserve efforts to achieve our Mission and Vision in alignment with our Strategic Plan

Page 4: 2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments

The Challenges in Context-Comparing to the 50 Largest

4

Our circumstances become clearer when compared to California’s 50 largest school districts:• OUSD operates the most schools per student; and

• OUSD has the 3rd most teachers per student;

– Yet, OUSD has the lowest average teacher salary and years of teaching experience;

• OUSD Spends more on teacher salaries than 85% of districts (per ADA);

– But, OUSD has fewer Central office Classified Staff than 80% of districts (FTE per ADA).

Our financial challenges persist despite the reality that:

• OUSD is 4th in total revenue (per ADA); and

• OUSD is 2nd in Local Restricted Revenue, e.g. parcel taxes, grants and philanthropy (per ADA)

Page 5: 2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments

Our Mission and Vision are in Jeopardy

5

Unless we address these structural issues, we will continue to undermine our full

service community schools model, including:

Continued erosion basic infrastructure:

Continued erosion of community school services and central supports:

• Facilities maintenance• Site cleanliness standards• Technology for teachers and students• Professional development• Textbook and curriculum renewal

• Counseling supports• Teacher coaching and support• Restorative justice, case management for

vulnerable students • Targeted support for African American Students• Parent and Community Engagement• Language supports• Library services and health services

Page 6: 2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments

Understanding the Budget

6

Page 7: 2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments

2021-22 Total District Funds by projected expenditures*

General Fund$746.0M

Adult Ed$3.5M

Child Development$18.7M

Student Nutrition$22.7M

Facilities$215.4M

General Fund Restricted(Various)

₋ Federal (Titles I - V)₋ Local (Parcel Tax Measures

G, G1, N)₋ Grants (Salesforce, Kaiser)₋ Special Education₋ COVID (ESSERs)

Other Unrestricted(Various)State LotteryHome & Hospital

Supplemental & Concentration (S&C)(0002 - 0005)

₋ English Language Learners, Low Income & Foster Youth

₋ Teacher Retention, Academic Support, Climate & Culture

General Fund Base(0000)

₋ Basic Staffing₋ Talent, Finance,

Custodial, etc.

Self-Insurance$24.9M

* Projected 2021-22 Expenditures as of First Interim Report (10-31-21)

Net transfers ($83.7M)Unrestricted$319M

Restricted$426.4M

Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF)

Restricted Funds

7

$200M $80M $39M

Page 8: 2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments

LCFF Funding is Shaped by Attendance Levels

Enrollment is how we plan

Attendance is how we are funded

Note: Due to declining enrollment, the District will be funded using prior year ADA; thus, 2021-22 ADA will be used for the 2022-23 ADA projection which is expected to be better than actual 2022-23 ADA.

8

Page 9: 2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments

With Attendance declining, Multi-YearProjections (MYP) show deficits in next two years

The District’s 2022-23 and 2023-24 Fiscal Years are currently reflecting a Unrestricted General Fund deficits of $12.3M and $7.1M, respectively.

First Interim MYP

→ The projected deficits largely reflect declines in revenue due to lower projected enrollment and attendance ADA.

→ While expenditures are projected to initially decrease slightly, they will not compensate for the large loss in revenue.

→ Any future adjustments that impact positions or compensation will impact the deficits in 2022-23 and 2023-24

9

Page 10: 2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments

Reductions in LCFF impact the base funding we rely on to support all students and operations.

LCFF SUPPLEMENTAL & CONCENTRATION FUNDING

LOCAL RESTRICTED FUNDING

FEDERAL RESTRICTED FUNDING

Federal funding (Titles I, II, III, and IV, IDEA, and other grants) to serve students who are failing, or at risk of failing, to meet State academic standards; learning English; or receiving Special Education services.

Local funding (Measures N, G, G1, and grants/donations) for targeted programs across the district.

State funding to meet the specific needs of students who are low income, English Learners, unhoused, and/or foster youth.

Tier 2

Tier 2

Tier 3

Improved Student Outcomes

10

State funding to provide base educational programs for all students.

LCFF BASE FUNDINGSPECIAL EDUCATION FUNDING

State funding to provide base services for Special Education students.

Tier 1

Page 11: 2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments

Our Current Challenge - Deficits & Ongoing Compensation

Based on current information, the 2022-23 Budget will need to include budget adjustments of $40-50M to address projected deficits and the current need to increase ongoing employee compensation.

This provides a single year solution

11

Page 12: 2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments

Today’s Recommendations address the Current Challenge and lay groundwork for more structural changes ahead

12

The current recommended budget adjustments seek to:

• Better clarify what is Base vs. what is Supplemental Support and Services or District operational preference

• Interrogate adjustments in alignment with our strategic plan/LCAP and impact to equity and quality outcomes for students; and

• Meet the current challenge of addressing structural deficits and making room for improved staff compensation.

Page 13: 2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments

Identifying the Recommended Adjustments

13

Page 14: 2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments

Current Step:Evaluate adjustment options against goals and priorities

Affirm Priorities within Goals

LCAP - Strategic Plan

Ongoing. e.g., Literacy, staff compensation

Short-term. e.g. COVID response, loan payoff, technology transition, facilities improvements

Identify potential investments toward priorities

Existing spending. Bundled into areas of work within and across departments and schools - e.g. enrollment stabilization, recruitment & hiring.

Required spending adjustments. e.g. changes in law, ACOE guidance, utility costs.

Additional desired spending. e.g. loan payoff, continuation of program as one-time dollars lapse.

Implement & Evaluate

Put strategies into action and monitor results ideally with a structured monitoring process with periodic updates.

Develop Implementation Plan

Time. When and over what period are we committing

Talent. Staffing, hiring, or contracting resources needed

Treasure. Financial resources

5

1

2 3

4

1

4

5

2

Stakeholder Engagement informs each step

Prioritize potential investments

Based on expected impact on our goals.

3

14

Page 15: 2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments

Recap:Summary & Next Steps from 12/15 Budget Update• Takeaways

﹣ School site staffing has risen (even before COVID) even though enrollment/attendance has declined

﹣ Central office staff has been reduced over time

﹣ School Staff and Budget Allocations need realignment to meet changes in law and to facilitate budget adjustments

• Staff Recommendation for Budget Adjustments coming in Jan 2022

﹣ Will include reductions to central office

﹣ Will include heavy reliance on reductions to allocations to school sites

15

12/15 Update

Page 16: 2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments

Summary of Budget Adjustment Recommendations

16

Adjustment Summary Impact on Target

Unrestricted Base Funding (0000)

↓ Properly allocate non-base, supplemental services and support expenditures to S&C ($15.9M)

↓ Elimination of positions due to enrollment decline ($3.5M)

↓ Strategic reduction of expenditures to make room for priorities ($6.9M)

$26.3M

Central Office Reorg(Labor & Non-Labor)**

↓ Strategic reduction of expenditures to make room for priorities ($12.0M)$12.0M

Supplemental and Concentration (0002 -0005)

↑ Strategic adjustments in Equity Formula ($1.0M)

↓ Strategic expenditure reductions to make room for priorities ($1.7M)

↓ Reduction in positions due to enrollment decline ($1.1M)

$1.8M

Restricted Funds (G, G1, N, etc)

↓ Strategic reduction of expenditures to make room for priorities ($9.2M)$9.2M

$49.3M

↑ Increasing costs↓ Decreasing costs* All amounts currently based on estimates that will change

** Includes reductions in base and S&C

Page 17: 2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments

Unrestricted Base - Shifts to S&CRecommended Adjustment FTE/$ Unrestricted Base Details (Shifts to Supplemental & Concentration funding) Impact

Shift 39 positions identified in LCAP as S&C to S&C

39.0 FTE$3.95M

Move positions in the LCAP for A-G teachers, ELD Electives and newcomer teachers to S&C.

No impact to programming. Opportunity cost of lost opportunity to make alternative investments

Shift 4.8 Alt Ed positions into Concentration

4.8 FTE$458K

Some Alt Ed Base Teachers not currently coded correctly into S&C.

Shift 15 Case Managers & CSMs correctly into Supplemental

15.0 FTE$1.77M

Some Case Managers and CSM's not currently coded to S&C.

Shift additional cost of investment in 11-month teachers at certain schools

13.7 FTE$1.42M

11-month teaching positions were used (instead of normal 10-month positions) as a retention strategy at Board Priority schools (Elevation Network), including McClymonds, Castlemont, Fremont. Shift cost of additional month (9%) into S&C.

Shift cost of negotiated reductions of class size

27.5 FTE$2.86M

Per agreement, schools with more than 90% unduplicated pupil percentage receive additional teachers for smaller class sizes. Shift cost of additional teachers into S&C

Shift cost of class size reduction at some elementary

27.0 FTE$2.81M

Shift to S&C cost of investment in class size reduction at schools with 1 or 2 cohorts K-3 that cannot fill projected 802 empty seats of increased class size in grades 4-5.

Shift certain clerical positions into Supplemental Funding

22.7 FTE$2.63M

Audit of work identified appropriate for funding in Supplemental as work is beyond base programming.

Base

17

Page 18: 2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments

Recommended Adjustment FTE/$ Unrestricted Base Details(Eliminations due to enrollment decline)

Impact

Reduction of Base-funded Assistant Principal positions/Increase in Concentration-funded AP positions

4.0 FTE$580K

Based on shifts in enrollment at school sites, 23 Base APs earned based on enrollment (down from 26 in 21-22), while 17 APs awarded based on the Concentration AP formula (up from 13 in 21-22).

Reduction in FTE in Based funded FTE caused by the enrollment decline that is impacting the district. The impact of some of the AP reductions may be offset by the Equity Formula.

Reduction in Teaching positions

28.3 FTE$2.94M

Based on enrollment decline, positions including base teachers and prep teachers.

Reduction aligns with existing allocation formulas

Unrestricted Base - Enrollment DeclineBase

18

Page 19: 2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments

Recommended Adjustment FTE/$ Unrestricted Base Details (Strategic reduction to make room for priorities)

Impact

Reduction in deferred maintenance budget

N/A$2.0M

Reduce planned investment from General Fund into Deferred Maintenance out of initial $5M commitment (in lieu of school consolidations)

Deep facilities needs will either not be addressed or be postponed based on a prioritization of urgency. Examples include furnace and window replacements, pool repair, roofing and flooring projects.

Eliminate vacancies 22.6 FTE$1.5M

Board action in lieu of school consolidations Planned work will not be implemented, however, the work was not being implemented due to our inability to fill all vacancies.

Elimination of co-principals 2.0 FTE$443K

End strategy of Co-Principals at Skyline and Fremont.

Skyline and Fremont to eliminate co-principal positions. Skyline traded a principal position for an assistant principal position and Fremont will transition to regular administrative structure in the upcoming year.

Payoff of State Loan with one-time funds

N/A$2.1M

Funds committed (set aside) to cover ongoing payments for outstanding state loans.

Reduction of ESSER Available dollars for other investments.

Cost Avoidance from recommended FTE reductions

$868K Additional reduction generated by avoiding salary increases on reduced positions.

Reduction of positions provide upside and reduces the ongoing compensation expenditures for the District, recognizing that there are also coinciding reduction in services.

Unrestricted Base - Strategic ReductionsBase

19

Page 20: 2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments

Recommended Adjustment FTE/$ Details (Strategic reduction to make room for priorities)

Impact

Consolidate Behavioral Health and Attendance Office positions.

23.1 FTE$2.9M

Merge multiple, singularly focused roles into one role focused on Multi-Tiered Systems of Support.

Reduction in positions to create 5 individualized positions aligned to each network. will be the focus of a new position within the Multi-Tiered Systems of Support strategy. Focus on positive school culture and attendance.

Decrease the staffing in Dept. of English Language Learner & Multilingual Achievement (3FTE)Decrease Linked Learning (2FTE) Decrease Academic Innovation (1.9FTE) Decrease Office of Equity (2.7FTE)

9.6 FTE$1.2M

Instead of 7 specialists assigned to support 5 Networks, there will be 5 specialists assigned, 1 per Network.

Central and site-based staff are collaborating in service of college and career readiness. Increasingly, students are opting to defer or not go to college. It's imperative that we provide continuous and high-quality supports to our students as they venture into their post-graduation lives. Students are significantly more likely to attend and complete college if they have completed financial aid applications, which this initiative has successfully increased.

Decrease Research Assessment Data (RAD) staffing.

2.0 FTE$396K

Supervision will be the responsibility of the Executive Director.

The assessment team can be structured differently so we can focus on bringing our services closer to school sites.

Central Office Reductions - Academic*Base

20

Page 21: 2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments

Recommended Adjustment FTE/$ Details (Strategic reduction to make room for priorities)

Impact

Shift staffing positions into ESSER Funds based on major shift in workload based on COVID

0.5 FTE

$114K

Shift to more restricted resources given change in workload driving by COVID Supports.

No impact

Reduced training for central operational divisions.

$26K

CASBO and other organizations offer training on best practices to improve efficiencies and cost savings. There would be a reduction in these trainings for staff.

Less operational training for operations divisions that provide operational support to Custodial, Tech Services, and Nutrition Services

Tech Services:Reduction in software investments as we consolidate around unifying programs

$503K

Move to single communication platform and only pay for core platforms out of the general fund like i-Ready, Newsela, and other base offerings.

School sites will have less options for software and communications platforms as we consolidate around fewer platforms (eg. Parent Square). Some of the supplemental software programs will be funded by restricted funds.

Custodial Services:Shift in funding of ED and reduction in custodial supplies as we refine centralized ordering

0.2 FTE$52K

$168K

Increased efficiency in ordering system to reduce waste at school site and over ordering that can happen at some schools and shift of position to RRMA to match reductions from $3M in elminiations in 2019-20.

No net impact in current year as ESSER funding is paying for custodial supplies. As we implement new systems for custodial supplies and ordering costs will be redacted in ongoing funds.

Central Office Reductions - Operations*Base

21

Page 22: 2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments

Recommended Adjustment FTE/$Details (Strategic reduction to make room for

priorities) Impact

Reduce Business / Accounting Staffing

2.0 FTE $291K

Reduce Staffing to support the retention of remaining positions

Less accounting staff and requirement to accelerate efficiencies and re-allocate tasks balanced with new higher level positions (currently recruiting).

Central Office Reductions - Financial Services*Base

22

Page 23: 2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments

Recommended Adjustment FTE/$Details (Strategic reduction to make room for

priorities) Impact

Reduce Human Resources Staffing

3.0 FTE$589K

Reduce Staffing to support the retention of remaining positions

Increased workload of remaining positions. Work will need to be reallocated to remaining positions. The work includes substitute management, compensation and classification, teacher residency work and hr operations.

Shift staffing positions into EE Block Grant Funds based on board approved plan

2.0 FTE$333K

Shift to more restricted resources given the block grant towards educator effectiveness. We are able to move our teacher positions that provide direct coaching support in the classroom to these funds.

No impact to operations. Opportunity cost of ability to use Educator Effective Grant funds for other purposes.

Central Office Reductions - Talent*Base

23

Page 24: 2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments

Recommended Adjustment FTE/$Details (Strategic reduction to make room

for priorities) Impact

Student Welcome Center (enrollment office) reorganization

2.0 FTE$211K

Eliminate 2 FTE and redistribute responsibilities to remaining staff.

No impact on services to families.

Enrollment, Communications and Ombudspersons Office -Non-labor reductions

$68K Supplies, consultants, travel No impact on essential services.

Eliminate - Deputy General Counsel position

1.0 FTE$268K

Eliminate unfilled position Limited impact on essential services.

Eliminate - Mgr Publications 1.0 FTE$119K

Eliminate Vacant Position

Additional Non-Labor Adjustments

$5.9M Reduce additional services and supplies to support the District’s reductions in expenditures.

Reductions to investments in supplies, professional development, services, consultants, technology, subscriptions in central supply budgets

Central Office Reductions - OtherBase

24

Page 25: 2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments

Increases in S&C Funding Allow Shifts from BaseS&C

25

Increase in available ongoing S&C funding: $12.3M in 2022-23

The increase in Supplemental & Concentration funds make it possible to fund positions that were historically funded through General Purpose Base (0000) but where the expenditures are supplemental to the Base program.

While this allows for maintaining the positions shifted to Supplemental and Concentration funding, it prevents new investments to expand the supplemental supports at schools. See slide with details of shifts.

Page 26: 2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments

Recommended Adjustment FTE/$

Supplemental & Concentration Details (Adjustments to Equity Formula) Impact

Creation of Equity APs Increase5.0 FTE$725K

Using a tiering system with UPP percentages instead of enrollment, additional AP's allocated to schools with greater need.

Addition of administrator support at higher need schools that no longer meet the threshold for AP positions based on enrollment alone.

Increase in Case Managers and Community School Managers

Increase9.0 FTE$1.0M

Change in Equity Tier results in Increase of 2.5 FTE of case managers and 6.5 FTE of Community School Managers

Addition of case managers, Restorative Justice Facilitators, Community Schools Managers, and other high-impact student-facing positions at secondary schools to provide more student supports and allow these positions to shift to LCFF Supplemental & Concentration funding.

Elimination of clerical positions

Reduction9.8 FTE$659K

Net elimination of 9.7 FTE clerical positions linked to enrollment decline, change in tiering for schools and shifts in Equity Formula.

Reduction in clerical capacity at secondary schools as these allocations become student support roles that can be funded in LCFF Supplemental & Concentration.

S&C - Adjustments to Equity FormulaS&C

26

Page 27: 2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments

Recommended Adjustment FTE/$

Supplemental & Concentration Details (Strategic Reductions and Enrollment Decline) Impact

Reduction in Supplemental Allocation

DecreaseTBD FTE

$1.5M

In lieu of Cohort 3 school consolidations, Board approved reduction of $65 per student out of $850 per student supplemental allocation

School communities will determine what is reduced from reduced allocation

Eliminate vacancies

$186KBoard action in lieu of school consolidations Planned work will not be implemented, however, the work

was not being implemented due to our inability to fill all vacancies.

Increase in Case Managers and Community School Managers

Increase10.9 FTE

$1.1M

Reduction in LCAP for A-G, ELD and Newcomer based positions due declining enrollment

Reduction aligns with existing allocation formulas

S&C - Strategic Reductions and Enrollment DeclineS&C

27

Page 28: 2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments

Recommended Adjustment FTE/$

Restricted Details (Strategic Reductions and Enrollment Decline) Impact

Reduction in Supplemental Allocation

TBD FTE$9.2M

Many restricted funds do not increase or do so slightly each year (e.g., Measure N, G1 and G). If increases are not sufficient to offset increased costs, reductions must be made (absent other funding). Salary increases are such a cost that is often not covered by restricted revenue increases.

Through normal budget process, schools will prioritize expenditures based on same funds but with updated costs.This will feel like a reduction to school sites because the positions they previously purchased will cost more. The amount of funding will mostly remain the same, unless the school has experienced an enrollment decline.

Restricted - Strategic Reductions to support prioritiesRestricted

28

Page 29: 2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments

School Staffing Adjustments

• Result of enrollment decline using existing allocation formulas

• Result of changes to Equity Formula with aggregate result of more staffing than would otherwise be allocated to support neediest students

Honoring Local Decision-making

29

School Funding Adjustments

• Schools prioritize spending locally to adjust to small reduction in Supplemental allocation (7.6%).

• Schools prioritize spending locally to adjust to higher staffing costs within 2021-22 Restricted allocation levels.

Note that many reductions were based on estimates that cannot be fully known until budget processes mentioned here are completed. Updates will continue.

Page 30: 2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments

Timeline

Jan 12 Jan 20

PSAC Meeting with SSC

Members

Jan 19 Jan 26

Board Meeting: First

Interim Report, Budget

Adjustment (First Read)

Board Meeting: Special

Meeting on Budget

Adjustments (tentative)

Jan 11-Jan 24

Board Engagements Board Meeting: First Interim

Report, Budget Adjustment

(Approval)

30

Page 31: 2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments

EVERY STUDENT THRIVES!

1000 Broadway, Suite 680, Oakland, CA 94607Contact us for additional information [optional contact area]Phone: 510.555.5555 | Email: [email protected]

Page 32: 2022-23 Recommended Budget Adjustments

First Interim - Key Assumptions