2015-2016 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT · Norco Mr. Dan Cuthbertson Perris Mr. Michael Morales Riverside Mr. Kevin Street Riverside County Mr. Steve Horn San Jacinto Mr. Mike Emberton Special

2015-2016 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT

TO THE

SANTA ANA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

SARWQCB ORDER NO. R8-2010-0033

NPDES NO. CAS 618033

NOVEMBER 30, 2016

BY THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT,

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND CITIES OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY (SANTA ANA REGION)

CERTIFICATION for the

FY 2015-2016 Santa Ana Region Annual Report

I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.

Signe~J L\\~V-STUART E. MCKIBBIN Chief of Watershed Protection Division Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District

P8/209186

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The District would like to thank the following agencies and their stormwater program representatives

for supplying information used in the 2015-2016 Annual Report.

Beaumont Mr. Hisam Baquai

Calimesa Mr. Bob French

Canyon Lake Mr. Mike Borja

Corona Mr. Jeff Potts

Eastvale Mr. Joe Indrawan

Hemet Ms. Linda Nixon

Jurupa Valley Mr. Bob Makowski

Lake Elsinore Ms. Rita Thompson

Menifee Mr. Jonathan Smith

Moreno Valley Mr. Ahmad Ansari

Norco Mr. Dan Cuthbertson

Perris Mr. Michael Morales

Riverside Mr. Kevin Street

Riverside County Mr. Steve Horn

San Jacinto Mr. Mike Emberton

Special thanks to Ms. Charlene Warren for her assistance with compiling and assembling both the

reporting information and the report itself.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE

- i -

INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... I-1

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ....................................................................................................................1-1

1. PROGRAM ORGANIZATION .....................................................................................................1-1

Management Steering Committee ............................................................................................1-3

Technical Advisory Committee ................................................................................................1-5

Subcommittees .........................................................................................................................1-7

Implementation Agreement ....................................................................................................1-14

2. FISCAL ANALYSIS ......................................................................................................................2-1

Permittee Budgets And Expenditures .......................................................................................2-2

Area-Wide Programs ................................................................................................................2-3

Funding Sources .......................................................................................................................2-3

Santa Ana Watershed Benefit Assessment Area ................................................................2-3

County Service Area 152 ...................................................................................................2-4

Street Sweeping Assessment..............................................................................................2-4

Utility Charge ....................................................................................................................2-5

General Fund / Other Revenues .........................................................................................2-5

PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION .............................................................................................................3-1

3. LEGAL AUTHORITY ...................................................................................................................3-1

4. PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION............................................................4-1

Local Implementation Plan ......................................................................................................4-1

Drainage Area Management Plan .............................................................................................4-1

5. ILLICIT CONNECTIONS/ILLEGAL DISCHARGES .................................................................5-1

Actions to Investigate and Eliminate IC/ID .............................................................................5-1

Field Reconnaissance Activity .................................................................................................5-1

Results Database.......................................................................................................................5-1

Training ....................................................................................................................................5-1

6. PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY ......................................................6-1

Inventory Database ...................................................................................................................6-1

Inspector Training Requirements .............................................................................................6-2

7. INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL SOURCES ........................................................................7-1

Current Industrial and Commercial Facility Inspections ..........................................................7-1

Compliance Assistance Program ..............................................................................................7-1

Industrial/Commercial Facility Database .................................................................................7-3

Inspection Requirements ..........................................................................................................7-3

Industrial/Commercial Facility Inspector Training ..................................................................7-4

8. RESIDENTIAL ..............................................................................................................................8-1

9. PERMITTEE FACILITIES AND ACTIVITIES ............................................................................9-1

MS4 Maintenance Program ......................................................................................................9-1

Fertilizer/Pesticide Applicator Training Requirements ............................................................9-1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE

- ii -

10. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING ....................................................................................................10-1

Water Quality Management Plan ...........................................................................................10-1

Hydromodification .................................................................................................................10-8

11. MONITORING ANNUAL REPORT ................................................... UNDER SEPARTE COVER

12. PUBLIC EDUCATION and OUTREACH................................................................................... 12-1

Program Overview .................................................................................................................12-1

Program Highlights ................................................................................................................12-1

Santa Ana Pollutants of Concern ............................................................................................12-2

13. PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS ASSESSMENT ........................................................................13-1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

- iii -

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1-1 Attendance at NPDES Santa Ana MSC Meetings ................................................. 1-4

Table 1-2 Attendance at NPDES Santa Ana TAC Meetings ................................................. 1-6

Table 2-1 Permittee Budgets and Expenditures ..................................................................... 2-2

Table 2-2 Budgets and Expenditures – Area Wide Programs (Santa Ana Region) ............... 2-3

Table 3-1 Legal Authority/Enforcement ................................................................................ 3-2

Table 4-1 Program Implementation and Evaluation .............................................................. 4-2

Table 5-1 Illicit Connections/Illegal Discharges .................................................................... 5-2

Table 6-1 Construction Activities Summary Table ................................................................ 6-3

Table 7-1 Industrial Commercial Activities Summary Table ................................................ 7-6

Table 8-1 Residential.............................................................................................................. 8-2

Table 9-1 Permittee Facilities and Activities ......................................................................... 9-2

Table 10-1 Department Responsible for Conditions of Approval ......................................... 10-1

Table 10-2 Development Planning ......................................................................................... 10-2

Table 12-1 Public Education and Outreach .......................................................................... 12-13

Table 13-1 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Program Effectiveness ................... 12-5

Table 13-2 Permittee Facilities and Activities Program Effectiveness .................................. 13-6

Table 13-3 Development Planning Program Effectiveness ................................................... 13-7

Table 13-4 Private Development Construction Activity Program Effectiveness .................. 13-8

Table 13-5 Industrial and Commercial Sources Program Effectiveness ................................ 13-9

Table 13-6 Residential Sources Program Effectiveness ....................................................... 13-10

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure I-1 Map of Permit Area ............................................................................................... I-7

Figure 1-1 Organizational Chart – Riverside County NPDES Municipal Stormwater

Permits .................................................................................................................. 1-2

LIST OF EXHIBIT

Exhibit A Riverside County Watershed Protection Program Dialogue ............................... 12-5

TABLE OF CONTENTS

- iv -

APPENDICES

A – NPDES Meetings

Management Steering Committee

Technical Advisory Committee

Southern California Monitoring Coalition

California Stormwater Quality Association

Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force

Middle Santa Ana River Task TMDL Task Force

Public Education Committee

B – Training Attendance

Sign-in sheets for District-sponsored Training

C – Household Hazardous Waste Collection Report

D – Hazardous Material Response Team Report

E – Public Education

NPDES Complaints received by District Staff

F – Program Evaluation (Debris Removal) and MS4 Maps

Debris Removed from MS4

MS4 Maps

G – Implementation Agreement

H - Comprehensive Bacteria Reduction Plan Implementation Summary

I - Comprehensive Nutrient Reduction Plan Implementation Summary

J - Permittee Reports

K - ICID Results Database

L - Compliance Surveys and Spreadsheets

M - June 2016 DAMP

P8/20

INTRODUCTION

INTRODUCTION Page I-1

On January 29, 2010 the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (SARWQCB) issued a

"Fourth-term" area-wide National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal

Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Stormwater Permit (2010 MS4 Permit) to the Riverside County

Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District), the County of Riverside (County) and the

Cities of Beaumont, Calimesa, Canyon Lake, Corona, Hemet, Lake Elsinore, Menifee, Moreno

Valley, Murrieta, Norco, Perris, Riverside, San Jacinto and Wildomar (Cities), for the portion of the

Santa Ana Region located within Riverside County (Order No. R8-2010-0033). Figure I-1 shows

the portion of Riverside County that is within the jurisdiction of the SARWQCB.

The 2010 MS4 Permit incorporates several new programs addressing Low Impact Development

(LID), hydromodification, Permittee public works projects, illicit discharge detection and

elimination, mobile businesses, watershed scale planning, urban and MS4 retrofit, De-Minimus and

General Construction Permit coordination, and program effectiveness assessment. The 2010 MS4

Permit also required the Permittees to develop Permittee specific implementation manuals called

Local Implementation Plans (LIPs).

Recent Permittee activities have been focused on developing programs to comply with the 2010 MS4

Permit, and addressing total maximum daily load (TMDL) impaired waterbodies such as Canyon

Lake, Lake Elsinore, and the Middle Santa Ana River. The Permittees have developed task forces,

pursued grants, and re-evaluated their compliance programs as necessary to ensure that urban runoff

does not contribute to these impairments.

Major program updates and accomplishments described in this report include:

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/ADMINISTRATION

Continued participation in the Santa Ana "One Water One Watershed" (OWOW) planning

process which focuses on establishing regional solutions for water problems within the

Santa Ana Region and is intended to develop linkages between all water interests.

Continued active participation with California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA).

Continuation of the Permittees' Management Steering Committee (MSC) bi-annual

meetings.

Continuation of the Permittees' Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meetings.

Continued participation in the Stormwater Quality Standards Task Force (SWQSTF).

INTRODUCTION


PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION

New MS4 Permit Negotiation

The Permittees' ROWD was submitted on July 29, 2014; the 2010 MS4 Permit expired on

January 29, 2015 and was administratively extended until the effective date of the new

permit. Permit negotiations are the program's primary focal point throughout FY 2016-

2017.

New Development

Continued development of the following Watershed Action Plan (WAP) Components: the

Regional Geodatabase, Hydromodification Susceptibility Mapping and Report, the

Hydromodification Management Plan (HMP), and the Retrofit Study. Per 2010 MS4

Permit requirements, a draft WAP was submitted by the Permittees for Regional Board

approval on January 29, 2013; the Permittees received comments from the Regional

Board, and re-submitted the revised WAP on June 24, 2013. The Permittees received

comments from the Regional Board on the revised WAP, HMP, and Hydromodification

Susceptibility Mapping and Report on December 18, 2013 and March 21, 2014,

respectively. The WAP, HMP, and Hydromodification Susceptibility Mapping and

Report were re-submitted to the Regional Board on May 29, 2014 and again on January 7,

2015. The District, on behalf of the Permittees, continues to meet with the Regional Board

to finalize the WAP and supporting Hydromodification documents. The WAP was

submitted again on June 18, 2015. Once approved, the DAMP will be updated to include

language from the approved WAP and supporting documents.

The District gathered common questions and concerns about the WQMP Guidance

Document, Template and Glossary, and created an errata on June 30, 2016. The errata

changes will be updated in the WQMP Guidance Document in FY 2016-2017.

IC/ID

The 2010 MS4 Permit required expansion of the IC/ID Program and required

implementation of a more rigorous and proactive IC/ID detection and elimination

program, including development and implementation of Permittee specific schedules to

conduct systematic investigations of MS4 outfalls with a diameter of 36 inches or larger.

The District also purchased and provided handheld multi-meters capable of measuring pH,

temperature, and specific conductivity (parameters mentioned in the CMP) for Permittee

use during IC/ID investigations. An update on the Permittees' investigations is included

in Section 5.

Continued implementing the complaint call database for tracking of potential IC/ID

complaints received from the public.

Continued financial support for area-wide stormwater pollution prevention programs,

including the Hazardous Materials (HAZMAT) Response Team, Household Hazardous

Waste (HHW) collection events, and Anti-freeze, Batteries, Oil and Paint (ABOP)

program.

INTRODUCTION


Municipal

Permittees continue to review its fixed facility (Corporate Yard) and its field operations

and MS4 facilities (Maintenance Activities) to ensure that they are addressed by the

Municipal Facilities Pollution Prevention Plan (MFPPP) and do not cause or contribute to

a pollution or nuisance in receiving waters.

Construction

Permittees attended Qualified SWPPP Developer/Qualified SWPPP Practioner

(QSD/QSP) training to receive proper certification as required under the Construction

General Permit.

Monitoring

Continued collection and analysis of water quality samples in accordance with the Permit's

Monitoring and Reporting Program via the Consolidated Monitoring Program (CMP) for

water quality monitoring. Water quality samples are collected during dry and wet weather

at MS4 outfalls and receiving water stations, and are analyzed for required constituents to

ensure compliance with the 2010 MS4 Permit.

The CMP for water quality monitoring describes the monitoring efforts that will be

implemented to comply with the County's three MS4 Permits. Specifically, the Santa Ana

Region Monitoring Plan (CMP Volume IV) was updated in August 2012 to comply with

the 2010 MS4 Permit. It is reviewed annually, and was updated July 2014, and again in

November 2014 with minor errata to reflect current methods and improvements based on

program information. Minor corrections were made to Water Quality Objective tables to

reflect the Basin Plan update. The 2014 CMP updates are applicable to the 2015-2016

monitoring year. The CMP includes procedures for collection and analysis of water

quality samples at Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems' (MS4) outfalls and receiving

waters sites for a variety of constituents. The CMP also includes monitoring efforts for

the LE/CL TMDL, MSAR TMDL development, Hydromodification Monitoring, LID

Monitoring, and participation in the Regional Watershed Monitoring through membership

with the Southern California Stormwater Monitoring Coalition (SMC). These additional

monitoring components and Special Studies have stand-alone work plans that have been

developed and approved for these components independently of the CMP.

Continued participation in the SMC, a regional monitoring group comprised of Southern

California Phase 1 Municipal NPDES Permit holders whose focus is developing effective,

meaningful stormwater quality monitoring techniques. This included a 2009-2013

regional effort and involved the participation of approximately 20 public agency

participants. It included the stratification of 15 watersheds for the overall southern coast

region of California, which spanned from Ventura County to San Diego County. The goal

was to monitor 450 sites overall (i.e., approximately 90 sites per year); however, with

collaboration, results from 545 sites region-wide were included in the assessment of over

4,350 miles of streams in the southern coast region of California. The final report was

published in May 2015 and can be found on the Southern California Coastal Water

Research Project and/or SMC websites. Based on the findings and lessons learned from

INTRODUCTION


this effort, a revised study design has commenced for the 2015-2019 regional monitoring

effort.

TMDL

The Permittees continued participating in the LE/CL TMDL Task Force and the MSAR TMDL Task

Force. The purpose of both Task Forces is to implement joint requirements of the TMDLs and to

address these impairments. Some implementation highlights for the 2015-2016 fiscal year include

the following:

Continued participation in the Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake Nutrient TMDL Task Force.

The Task Force is comprised of stakeholders regulated by the Regional Board through the

Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake Nutrient TMDL (LE/CL TMDL), which was adopted on

December 17, 2004. The District also participates in another TMDL Task Force for the

Reach 3 Santa Ana River Pathogen Indicator TMDL (MSAR TMDL), which was adopted

on August 26, 2005. The purpose of both Task Forces is to implement joint requirements

of the TMDLs, to address these impairments and implement the TMDLs. The agreements

for both Task Forces were recently renewed and have a term of five (5) years. The current

task force agreements are set to expire on June 17, 2017 for the LE/CL TMDL Task Force,

and December 1, 2017 for the MSAR TMDL Task Force.

The Permittees utilized the LE/CL TMDL Task Force to implement the approved

Comprehensive Nutrient Reduction Plan (CNRP) which includes an alum treatment

project for Canyon Lake, as well as the continued funding and aeration of the Lake

Elsinore Aeration and Mixing System. The services of a consultant (Amec Foster

Wheeler) were secured to perform monitoring requirements of the LE/CL TMDL Phase 2

Compliance Monitoring Program. Please see The Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake

Watershed Nutrient TMDL Monitoring 2015-2016 Annual Report (Appendix I) which

summarizes the results of the LE/CL monitoring effort for the 2015-2016 fiscal year. Also,

in compliance with the CNRP, a LE/CL TMDL Progress Report: "Evaluation of

Compliance with the 2015 Interim Response Targets for Dissolved Oxygen and

Chlorophyll-a in Canyon Lake and Lake Elsinore" was completed by the Task Force in

June 2016. This Interim Compliance report (see Appendix I) describes both the in-lake

projects and watershed BMPs and summarizes the effectiveness of these efforts at

improving water quality in each lake since the adoption of the LE/CL TMDL.

The Permittees utilized the MSAR TMDL Task Force Agreement to facilitate the hiring

of a consultant to aid in the implementation of the Comprehensive Bacteria Reduction Plan

(CBRP) for those Permittees named in the TMDL within Riverside County. The CBRP

was approved at the February 10, 2012 Regional Board meeting and is currently in the

implementation phase. Specifically, the consultant (CDM Smith, Inc.) was contracted to

develop a monitoring program to identify and quantify uncontrollable sources of bacteria

in the Middle Santa Ana River Watershed. The consultant finished field monitoring

activities in January 2016. A final report was developed (see Appendix H) that discusses

the findings and recommendations to help the Task Force identify causes of elevated

bacteria concentration in the MSAR watershed.

INTRODUCTION


Public Education

Continued to provide outreach material for District new employee orientation sessions

regarding appropriate stormwater stewardship practices, including clean water

information and an introduction to the Riverside County Watershed Protection Program.

REPORTING FORMAT

The current MS4 Permit requires the Permittees to report on the progress and status of their

stormwater program activities in an annual report. This Annual Report is intended to comply with

that requirement and chronicle the Permittees' progress in implementing the provisions of the MS4

Permit.

As Principal Permittee, the District has attempted to focus attention on the principle components of

the Permittees' municipal stormwater management programs and convey relevant information to the

SARWQCB in a clear and concise manner. To facilitate the reporting process, District staff prepared

the summary tables that appear throughout this report. These tables are intended to summarize the

information pertaining to the various program activities implemented by the Permittees, and to

facilitate a consistent annual reporting process. While the District aggregates the information

presented in the summary tables, the information is provided by each of the individual Permittees.

For additional information regarding any individual Permittee's program, the readers of this report

should refer to that Permittee's reporting forms provided in Appendix J – Permittee Reports.

The remainder of this report reviews the Permittees' accomplishments over the course of the

reporting period and presents the status of the Permittees' ongoing efforts and planned activities to

implement their respective municipal stormwater programs and comply with the provisions of the

MS4 Permit 2010 MS4 Permit.


FIGURE I-1. MAP OF PERMIT AREA

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT Page 1-1 Section 1 – Program Organization

1. PROGRAM ORGANIZATION

The 2010 MS4 Permit adopted January 29, 2010 by the SARWQCB designates the District as

Principal Permittee; the County of Riverside, and the Cities of Beaumont, Calimesa, Canyon Lake,

Corona, Hemet, Lake Elsinore, Menifee, Moreno Valley, Murrieta, Norco, Perris, Riverside, San

Jacinto and Wildomar are designated as Co-Permittees. Subsequently, during the adoption of the

2010 Santa Margarita MS4 Permit, the SDRWQCB and SARWQCB agreed to allow the Cities of

Murrieta and Wildomar to be wholly regulated under the SDRWQCB for the purposes of the MS4

Permit requirements, while Menifee would be wholly regulated under the SARWQCB for the

purposes of the MS4 Permit requirements. In addition, the Cities of Eastvale and Jurupa Valley

incorporated after the adoption of the 2010 MS4 Permit and have expressed their intent to be

regulated under the 2010 MS4 Permit. On June 7, 2013 the SARWQCB adopted Order No. R8-

2013-0024 amending Order No. R8-2010-0033, NPDES No. CAS 618033 to add the newly

incorporated Cities of Eastvale and Jurupa Valley to the list of Permittees. The Order also removed

two Cities, Murrieta and Wildomar, from the list of Permittees; and added all portions of the City of

Menifee under the Order, including those portions that are under the jurisdiction of the SDRWQCB.

In accordance with the San Diego MS4 Permit, Order No. RB-2010-0016, the Cities of Murrieta and

Wildomar are required to comply with the applicable provisions of the Santa Ana MS4 Permit, Order

RB-2010-0033, pertaining to implementation of the nutrient total maximum daily loads (TMDL)

pertaining to Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake. Similarly, Order RB-2010-0033 requires the City of

Menifee to comply with any TMDLs and associated MS4 Permit requirements issued by the

SDRWQCB that includes the City of Menifee as a responsible party.

The responsibilities of the Principal Permittee and the Co-Permittees are defined in Section III of the

Permit. Figure 1-1 illustrates the relationships between the regulatory agencies, the Principal

Permittee, the Co-Permittees, and the other municipal stormwater permit areas in the County.

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT Section 1 – Program Organization Page 1-2

FIGURE 1-1. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART – RIVERSIDE COUNTY NPDES MUNICIPAL STORMWATER PERMITS

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT


MANAGEMENT STEERING COMMITTEE

The Management Steering Committee (MSC) met twice during FY 2015-2016 and was facilitated

through the Western Regional Council of Government's (WRCOG) Technical Advisory Committee

(TAC) which consists of the City Managers, Directors of Public Works, and other essential Co-

Permittee staff. The program updates provided to the MSC addresses urban runoff management

policies for the Permit Area and coordinated the review and necessary revisions to the DAMP,

Implementation Agreement, development of the WQMP, and updates regarding CBRP and CNRP

implementation. In addition, the MSC facilitates coordination with other water quality management

and monitoring programs, and responds to new legislative and regulatory initiatives. The meeting

agendas and minutes are included in Appendix A. In addition, Table 1-1 provides the record of

attendance for the MSC meetings.

Specifically, at the January 21, 2016 WRCOG TAC meeting, the MSC received a presentation on

the Federal Clean Water Act Stormwater Permit Program which included an update of the

compliance programs and waterbody specific programs. The presentation also included an update on

the stormwater permit renewal status, potential issues with the permit renewal, and the trash policy.

At the May 19, 2016 WRCOG TAC meeting, the MSC received a presentation on the Federal Clean

Water Act Stormwater Permit Program which included an update of the compliance programs and

waterbody specific programs. The presentation also included an update on the renewal status of the

three watershed permits, the requirements for the Water Quality Improvement Plan in the Santa

Margarita Region, and information about the State Trash Policy.

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT


TABLE 1-1. ATTENDANCE AT NPDES SANTA ANA MSC MEETINGS

21-Jan-16 19-May-16

RCFC

County

X

Beaumont

X X

Calimesa

X

Canyon Lake

X

Corona

Eastvale

Hemet

Jurupa Valley

Lake Elsinore

Menifee

X

Moreno Valley

Norco

X

Perris

X

Riverside

San Jacinto

X

Attended Meeting

X Did Not Attend

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT


TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE

The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) consists of representatives formally appointed by each

Permittee's City Manager or equivalent. The purpose of the TAC is to coordinate the implementation

of the DAMP and overall MS4 Permit compliance program. The District chairs and provides staff

support to the TAC. TAC meeting agendas and minutes are included in Appendix A.

In summary, meeting agendas have focused on implementation of the 2010 MS4 Permit requirements

and coordination of various program elements. A majority of the meetings have particularly focused

on the TMDL efforts, SWQSTF efforts, WQMP implementation, and public education updates.

Table 1-2 provides the record of attendance for the TAC meetings.

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT


Table 1-2. Attendance at FY 2015-2016 NPDES Santa Ana Technical Advisory Committee Meetings

23-Jul-15 27-Aug-15 24-Sep-15 22-Oct-15 26-Nov-15 3-Dec-15 28-Jan-16 25-Feb-16 24-Mar-16 28-Apr-16 26-May-16 23-Jun-16

RCFC DARK DARK

County DARK X DARK

Beaumont DARK DARK

Calimesa X DARK X DARK

Canyon Lake X DARK X DARK

Corona DARK DARK

Eastvale X DARK X DARK

Hemet DARK X DARK

Jurupa Valley X X DARK DARK

Lake Elsinore X DARK DARK

Menifee

X X DARK X DARK

Moreno Valley DARK DARK

Norco X DARK X DARK

Perris X DARK DARK

Riverside X DARK DARK

San Jacinto DARK DARK

RWQCB Santa Ana

DARK X DARK

Attended Meeting

X Did Not Attend

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT


SUBCOMMITTEES

Public Education

The Permittees have established an ongoing watershed based public education and outreach program

known as the Riverside County Watershed Protection Program. The specific objectives of the public

education program are included in Section 11.

Monitoring

The District participates in the SMC on behalf of the Permittees. The SMC includes representatives

from the Los Angeles, San Diego and Santa Ana Regional Boards, and each of the Principal

Permittees in southern California (i.e., the Counties of Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, San

Diego, and Ventura), and other interested municipalities. The overall goal for the SMC is to establish

a southern California stormwater research and monitoring agenda that would focus on improving

stormwater monitoring science, coordinating data collection efforts, and evaluating the effects of

stormwater discharges to receiving waters specific to southern California. Copies of the SMC Annual

Report, which highlights activities completed during FY 2015-2016 and the meeting agendas are

contained in Appendix A.

TMDLs

Riverside County Permittees within the MSAR Watershed (MSAR Permittees) participate in the

MSAR Bacterial Indicator TMDL Task Force (MSAR TMDL Task Force). Riverside County

Permittees within the San Jacinto River (SJR Permittees) Watershed participate in the LE/CL

Nutrient TMDL Task Force. The purpose of the TMDL Task Forces is to facilitate a coordinated

and cost-effective approach to comply with the MSAR Bacterial Indicator TMDL and LE/CL

Nutrient TMDL. Activity updates and/or reports that were completed by the MSAR TMDL Task

Force are included in Appendix H and the LE/CL TMDL Task Force update in Appendix I.

The District is currently working with a Consultant to identify feasible alternatives to help mitigate

dry weather flows within Eastvale MDP Line D and Line E that will help address the MSAR TMDL.

A geotechnical analysis was performed for Line E that identified a shallow groundwater table. The

shallow groundwater depth potentially eliminates the ability for infiltration of dry weather flows.

Alternatively, the District will look into potentially diverting dry weather flows to an existing sewer

system to eliminate dry weather flows.

The MSAR TMDL Task Force is currently implementing the SAR Bacteria Monitoring Program to

fulfill requirements of the adopted 2012 Basin Plan Amendment, as well as conducting monitoring

to support the MSAR TMDL. The monitoring program will include quarterly monitoring reports

describing monitoring activities and data collected during such activities. The quarterly monitoring

reports conducted during FY 2015-2016 can be found in Appendix H.

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT


Other Committees

The Stormwater Quality Standards Task Force (SWQSTF) was created to review the recreational

beneficial uses of the Santa Ana River Watershed. The goal of the SWQSTF is to effectively direct

the limited funding sources allocated for TMDL compliance toward the activities that would result

in the greatest measurable benefits. The SWQSTF and MSAR TMDL Task Force meetings are

coordinated by SAWPA.

On January 27, 2015, the County of Riverside adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant

to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Mitigation Monitoring Program, and approved the

Funding Agreement between the District and the Western Municipal Water District (WMWD) for

the Arlington Desalter Facility Expansion Project. The District partnered with WMWD to fund the

expansion of their Arlington Desalter facility. The original project consists of construction of three

recharge basins with a monitoring well at each location, an extraction well, and a raw water pipeline

that connects the extraction well with the Arlington Desalter. After further analysis, it was

determined that Victoria Basin (east of the intersection of Van Buren and Victoria Avenues) was the

only feasible project site out of the three locations. WMWD will complete preliminary design report

for Victoria Avenue Basin Project in November 2016 and anticipates to start the design of the

pipeline to the Desalter facility in early 2017. The project will facilitate recharge of currently unused

or underutilized local water resources, including stormwater and dry-weather flows. The project also

received Proposition 84 grant funding, and is expected to incorporate multiple benefits, including

increasing the sustainable yield of the Arlington Groundwater Basin, and decreasing pollutant loads

(particularly bacteria) to the Santa Ana River.

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT Section 2 – Fiscal Analysis Page 2-1

2. FISCAL ANALYSIS

Securing and sustaining adequate funding resources is arguably one of the most difficult issues MS4

Permittees must face. Priority will be given to preserving the most essential elements of existing urban

runoff programs, and identifying and implementing strategies to improve the efficiency of existing

programs in protecting receiving waters. The Permittees are still implementing significant budget

reductions and employee layoffs affecting vital basic services to offset reduced levels of revenue tied

to the current post-housing bubble. Some of these basic services will be needed even more by those

most impacted by the economic conditions. As MS4 Permit compliance programs will be competing

for finite resources with these services, it is anticipated that they will not be immune to reductions.

Permittee efforts to develop new revenue sources for the MS4 programs have had limited success.

Particularly, with the recent adoption of Proposition 26, it is unlikely that new sustainable revenue

sources will be generated in the near term and existing revenue sources have been significantly

impacted by the deteriorating economic conditions. Under these circumstances, compliance with

expanded permit requirements beyond current levels will likely require reduction or elimination of

other compliance activities or receipt of Federal or State funding.

In addition to Proposition 26, Senate Bill 69 which was proposed to move an estimated $18 to $19

million to the Cities of Eastvale, Jurupa Valley, Wildomar, and Menifee was vetoed by Governor

Brown on Sunday, September 28, 2014. It stems in part from a 2011 decision by California lawmakers,

via SB 89, to shift millions in vehicle license fee (VLF) funds from Cities as part of the prison

realignment process that shifted these costs from the State to Counties. The shifting of VLF funds was

done to help counties absorb these new costs. However, the funds were taken from cities that typically

rely heavily upon VLF funds. Locally, the four Cities most affected by the shifting of VLF funds were

Eastvale, Jurupa Valley, Wildomar, and Menifee, all of which have incorporated since 2008.

The costs incurred by the Permittees in implementing the Santa Ana Region DAMP fall into two broad

categories:

Shared Costs: These are costs that fund activities that are principally performed by the District

under the Implementation Agreement. These activities include overall stormwater program

coordination; interagency agreements; partnering with CASQA; attending meetings of the

SARWQCB or State Board; and coordination of consultant studies, Permittee meetings, and

training seminars.

Individual Permittee Costs for DAMP Implementation: These are costs incurred by each

Permittee for implementing BMPs within its jurisdiction (drainage facility inspections for illicit

connections, illegal discharges, drainage facility maintenance, drain inlet/catch basin stenciling,

emergency spill response, street sweeping, litter control, public education, etc.).

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT


PERMITTEE BUDGETS AND EXPENDITURES

The Permittees' individual budgets for FY 2016-2017 and the reported expenditures for FY 2015-2016

are presented in each Permittee's individual Annual Report. A summary showing these expenditures

reported by the Permittees is provided in Table 2-1.

TABLE 2-1. PERMITTEE BUDGETS AND EXPENDITURES

AGENCY 2015-2016

EXPENDITURES

2016-2017

BUDGET POPULATION 1

Beaumont $149,500.00 $295,500.00 45,118

Calimesa $63,015.12 $36,917.50 8,289

Canyon Lake $136,617.45 $165,235.65 10,681

Corona $1,567,499.00 $1,489,872.00 164,659

Eastvale $139,145.35 $156,940.00 63,162

Hemet $876,258.08 $839,333.53 80,070

Jurupa Valley $508,500.00 $344,422.00 98,177

Lake Elsinore $142,393.81 $359,967.93 61,006

Menifee $331,585.00 $314,000.00 89,004

Moreno Valley $816,373.00 $1,266,620.00 205,383

Norco - - 26,896

Perris $180,680.00 $370,446.00 73,722

Riverside $4,513,223.00 $5,145,299.00 324,696

San Jacinto $1,403,257.71 $1,697,136.40 47,656

County of Riverside $7,219,087.00 $7,332,750.00 364,413

RCFC&WCD $2,125,268.00 $3,267,486.00 N/A

TOTALS $20,172,402.52 $23,081.926.01 1,662,932 **Does include the City of San Jacinto

1 Source: State of California, Dept. of Finance, E-1 Population Estimates, and RCIT's Riverside County Progress Report. 2 Financial totals do not include the City of Perris fiscal information. 3 Note that populations for the County include areas that may not be wholly within the Santa Ana Region. 4Represents county-wide

expenditures.

AREA-WIDE PROGRAMS

The District provides financial support for several area-wide BMP programs including Hazardous

Materials Emergency Spill Response (HazMat Team), Household Hazardous Waste Collection

(HHW), and the Riverside County Watershed Protection Program (Public Education). In addition, the

District implements the stormwater monitoring program on behalf of all Permittees. A table

summarizing FY 2016-2017 budget and FY 2015-2016 expenditures for these activities is provided in

Table 2-2, on the following page.

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT


TABLE 2-2. BUDGETS AND EXPENDITURES – AREA WIDE PROGRAMS

(SANTA ANA REGION)

PROGRAM/ACTIVITY 2016-2017

Budget

2015-20161

Expenditures

Consulting Services $361,000.00 $44,953.00

Public Education $358,990.00 $107,324.00

Water Quality Monitoring $524,500.00 $229,268.00

Regional Pollution Prevention $375,000.00 $402,001.00

Staff and Administration $1,647,996.00 $1,341,720.00

TOTAL $3,267,486.00 $2,125,268.00

1Expenditures estimated at the time of preparation of this Annual Report.

FUNDING SOURCES

The Permittees currently employ four distinct funding methods alone or in combination to finance their

MS4 Permit compliance activities.

SANTA ANA WATERSHED BENEFIT ASSESSMENT AREA

The District established the Santa Ana Watershed Benefit Assessment Area (SAWBAA) in May 1991.

SAWBAA revenues fund both area-wide or "umbrella" DAMP activities and the District's individual

MS4 Permit compliance activities. The SAWBAA covers the "urbanized" portions of the Santa Ana

River Watershed within Riverside County, including both incorporated (City) and unincorporated

(County) areas. Property owners are assessed for the benefit derived from the development and

implementation of the DAMP activities supported or conducted by the District. Certain areas, e.g., the

more rural and remote mountainous regions, were excluded from the SAWBAA since little or no urban

runoff is generated in those areas. Undeveloped, vacant parcels and agricultural parcels are exempted

from the benefit assessment. Assessments are calculated by the District and enrolled on the property

tax bills generated by the County Tax Assessor's Office.

The amount of the assessment is based on a parcel's proportionate contribution to urban runoff, which

is a function of parcel size and its use.

Since the SAWBAA is an area-wide revenue source, certain activities and programs that are considered

of common and equal benefit to the entire area are financed, either wholly or in part, by the funds

generated by the District's annual benefit assessment revenue. These area-wide activities include:

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT


Monitoring Program (consolidated program for water quality monitoring);

HazMat Team – HazMat Response Team Annual Report provided as Appendix D;

ABOP/HHW Collection Program – Information regarding HHW collection events provided as

Appendix C;

Riverside County Watershed Program (Public Education);

Industrial/Commercial Compliance Assistance Program; and

Administrative/Program Management.

COUNTY SERVICE AREA 152

The County of Riverside formed County Service Area 152 (CSA 152) in December 1991 to provide

funding for MS4 Permit compliance activities. Originally, the CSA 152 assessment was collected

through property tax bills as an annual parcel charge in the unincorporated portions of the County. In

FY 1993-1994, the County adopted the same methodology (proportional runoff) for assessment

calculations used by the District. In FY 1995-1996, the County developed a modified assessment

methodology and began using the Transportation and Land Management Agency's Geographic

Information System (GIS) to perform the assessment calculations.

Under the laws that govern CSAs, subareas may be established within the overall service area with

different assessment rates set within each subarea. For example, the Cities of Corona, Lake Elsinore,

Moreno Valley, Norco, Riverside, and San Jacinto elected to participate in CSA 152. Under the CSA

152 program, individual Cities determine their respective assessment rates and have broad discretion

over how to allocate the funds. Several of these Cities also reported that they supplement their CSA

152 revenue with general fund and other sources of revenue.

STREET SWEEPING ASSESSMENT

In response to the provisions of Proposition 218, the County restructured its CSA 152 funding program

as a voter-approved street sweeping assessment in certain unincorporated areas. At the same time, the

County has allowed the participating Cities to continue their previously existing CSA 152 assessments

to go relatively unchanged.

UTILITY CHARGE

The City of Hemet funds a portion of its NPDES program activities through a utility charge. The charge

is collected via the monthly utility bills issued by the City of Hemet, the Lake Hemet Water District, or

Eastern Municipal Water District according to the respective service areas within the city.

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT


In addition, the City of Hemet reports using gas tax, general fund, and other revenues to support certain

stormwater management activities.

GENERAL FUND / OTHER REVENUES

The remaining Permittees utilize general fund revenue to finance their NPDES activities. Several of

the Permittees currently rely on their general fund to finance their DAMP activities.

In November 1996, California voters approved Proposition 218 ("The Right to Vote on Taxes

Initiatives") amending Article XIII of the State Constitution.1 Proposition 218 produced changes to

some of the Permittees' historic funding sources and still looms as a potential threat to others. For

example, the County dropped CSA 152 fees in unincorporated areas over concerns regarding

compliance with Proposition 218 provisions.

As with other municipal programs, the level of funding available for DAMP activities depends largely

on the public's willingness to provide financial resources. In general, funds available for DAMP

programs have become increasingly scarce as sources of municipal revenues have declined for many

local agencies. The provisions of Proposition 218, requiring voter approval of new taxes and

assessments, have significantly diminished the prospects for developing new or alternative funding

sources.

1 The Proposition 218 amendments require voter approval of any new taxes, fees, assessments, etc. In addition, certain

existing taxes and assessments were subject to the Initiative's voter approval requirements. "Special Taxes", as defined by

the Initiative, requires a 2/3rds majority vote while other types of assessments may only require a simple majority. In

addition, voter approval is required to raise any existing special tax or assessment rates by the Initiative, and require a 2/3rds

majority while other types of assessments may only require a simple majority. In addition, voter approval is required to

raise any existing special tax or assessment rates.


PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION Section 3 – Legal Authority Page 3-1

3. LEGAL AUTHORITY/ENFORCEMENT

Provision No. VIII of the 2010 MS4 Permit requires each Permittee to maintain adequate legal authority

to control the discharge of pollutants to the MS4 from urban runoff and enforce those authorities.

Provision No. VIII.F of the 2010 MS4 Permit requires the Permittees to annually review their

stormwater ordinances and their ordinance enforcement practices to assess their effectiveness in

prohibiting the discharges listed in the MS4 Permit.

A summary of each Permittee's legal authority status, as reported to the District, is presented in Table

3-1.

Table 3-1 – Legal Authority


LEGAL AUTHORITY/ENFORCEMENT


SANTA ANA REGION NPDES MUNICIPAL STORMWATER PERMIT

Provision Nos. VIII.B, XI.A.2, and XVI.F requires the Permittees to annually provide a summary of enforcement actions against violators of

their stormwater codes and ordinances.

PERMITTEE Please complete the following table summarizing the enforcement actions taken by your agency:

Beaumont

Incident Date Violation Pollutants/

Quantity

Enforcement

Action(s)

Disposition

July ,2015 Auto Spa Car Wash-illicit discharge Dry weather wash

water

Verbal warning

and education

No future violations noted

August ,2015 Popeye Restaurant-Dumpster wash

water discharge to Street

High Organic and

septic wastewater with

high BOD & Nutrients

Verbal warning

and education

Dumpster cleaned up and properly

secured to prevent illicit discharges.

Oct. November and

December, 2015

Pardee Homes

Fire hydrant –discharge carrying

sediments to storm drain

Sediments and

Chlorine residual

Written NOV

issued

Met with construction

superintendent and no future dry

weather discharges noted

January ,2016 Pardee Homes

BMPs inadequate

Sediments/ erosion Written NOV

issued

Emphasized continued maintenance

of BMPs

February, 2016 Pardee Homes-inadequate BMPs- Sediments leaving

construction project

Notice of

Corrective action

issued

Follow up inspections performed to

verify compliance

March ,2016 Pardee Homes –many tracts-some

BMPs not maintained

Sediments leaving site NOV issued Inspections frequency incresaed

April, 2016 Richmond Homes – tracts Sediments becoming

airborne and leaving

site

Verbal warning

& follow up

inspection

Problem corrected and no future

violations

Calimesa None to report for 2015-2016

Canyon Lake Attachment #1

Corona SEE ATTACHED SUMMARY- ATTACHMENT 'E'

Eastvale

Incident

Date

Violation Pollutants/Quantity Enforcement

Action(s)

Disposition

1/21/2016 Wash water runoff Soapy and dirty water from

trash enclosure

Enforcement letter sent to owner and

business

Fixed

9/18/2015 Discharge water full of sediment Unquantifiable amount of

dirty wash water

discharged

Verbal warning and requested to clean

up immediately

Fixed



8/22/2015 Paint runoff collecting in gutter and

flowing into storm drain

Paint water from backyard

work leaking into gutter


up immediately

Problem cleaned

immediately and

Fixed

2/2/2016 Oil Spill In street Oil spill No responsible party found Fixed

2/4/2016 Gas leak from vehicle in street Gas leak from vehicle No gas reached storm drain and was

cleaned properly

Fized

2/25/2016 Asphalt tack leak down street into

church storm water drains into JCSD

flood channel

Asphalt tack about 300 to

400 gallons

Flow blocked off and cleaned by

Starlite Hazmat

Cleaned and waste

removed by Starlite

Hazmat services

4/22/2016 Paint spilled into gutter and ran down

road

Paint spilled into gutter and

ran down road


up immediately

Fixed

4/14/2016 Grease container partially spilled and

ran into privately owned detention

basin and no storm drains

Used cooking oil Requested business get hazmat/or

collect wash water to sanitary sewer

and had them clean immediately

Storm water

reinspection

completed. Problem

cleaned and fixed.

Hemet

Incident

Date

Violation Pollutants/Quantity Enforcement Action(s) Disposition

12/28/2015 Discharge of dust from granite cutting

to RCFC storm drain; poor

housekeeping-dog waste exposed to

water

Granite dust; pet waste;

bacteria

Verbal and written warning: sweep up

& dispose of granite dust in trash;

direct waste water from granite cutting

to clarifier prior to discharge; keep

outdoor areas clean; remove dog

waste daily

1-4-2016: Facility

employees cleaned

up storm drain under

supervision of

RCFC

1-26-2016: Follow-

up inspection

conducted; outdoor

areas clean; point of

discharge blocked

1/26/2016 Allowing wash water & soil from off-

road vehicles to runoff property into

gutter

Soil/vehicle fluids Sent notice to comply with

Stormwater Ordinance on 1/26/2016

No further

complaints received

from neighbors

Jurupa Valley The City of Jurupa Valley has focused mainly on verbal warning and follow up inspections to ensure compliance is met.

Lake Elsinore

Incident

Date

Violation Pollutants/Qty Enforcement Action(s) Disposition

7/10/2015 rkt - rec'd report of business dumping

waste into the gutter and creating a

sewer smell

Nothing observed 7/13/2015 rkt - went to site - spoke

with business owner (Luis Terrazas)

and inspected both inside and outside

of business (crematory).

Resolved

7/20/2015 rkt rec'd call from Zully Smith that

vector calls related to RCFCD facility

Arroyo del torro are being received.

Potential Vector issue Researched question with staff and

contacted Nikia Smith of NWMVCD

to investigate site. Rkt also drove to

Resolved



They do not believe they have an

issue.

site and took photos. Standing water

possible vector source. Reported back

to Zully of suspicions; gave her

contact information for Nikia to

arrange for NWMVCD assistance.

7/24/2015 rkt - rec'd report from City staff of

potential for pollutants in unmarked

container.

No discharge, lack of

BMPs

rkt visited site - no answer at front

door of business. Viewed area behind

site, unmarked container improperly

stored noted. 7/28/2015 rkt - sent

letter to business owner with req to

remove potential violation s by 8/11.

8/13/2015 - rkt visited site. Spoke

with owner, Laslo - all clean,

secondary containment in place,

container marked, lidded and on pallet

Resolved

7/27/2015 rkt rec'd report of red waste (paint

from sanding a car) being hosed into

gutter. Flowed past 8 houses

red paint in powder form RKt - no response at door, confirmed

discharge. Left Notice of violation

and illegal discharge on garage door -

requiring cleanup by 7/30/2015 - do

not use hose to clean up.

Resolved

7/31/2015 rkt - noticed potential commercial auto

repair activity on residential vacant

lot.

Potential pollution issue -

no discharge

7/31/2015 rkt Took photos of potential

problems. Conducted research to

locate property owner. Sent letter to

property owner notifying them of

stormwater pollution potential and

potential illegal auto repair activity -

8/17/15 met with property owner and

code enf. on site. 8/18/15 notified by

City Manager, owner allowed to store

vehicles overnight IF they lay DG

layer on site. No vehicle repair or

cleaning permitted. 8/19/2015 DG

laid on site.

Resolved

8/4/2015 - They are doing a lot of oil changes

on both driveways and the street in

front of the house and it looks like an

oil slick. Last night they were hosing

the oil down from the driveway onto

the street. It must have gone into the

public sewer.

Oil drips - Nothing

measurable noted

8/4/2015 - RKT & Scott Rippstein

visited site. 2 small oil stains in

driveway, no other evidence of spills

in driveway or 'washing down' into

storm drain. No answer at door. sent

letter, educational material, brochure

and oil cleanup flyer to home.

Advised resident to clean up spills, fix

truck w/ leak and / or put container

under truck to catch leak. Referred

leaking truck (cob webs, been sitting

Resolved

Lake Elsinore



there a long time) to code

enforcement.

8/4/2015 - City staff working in area reported

sewer odor in area.

Odor - unable to locate

source. N/A

8/5/2015 rkt - Rita & Scott drove to

area and walked the vicinity. Caught

a wiff of the odor, checked the

manholes in the area, did not notice

odor coming from them. odor carried

by the wind. Checked properties

within a block of the immediate area

for sewage spill or septic leak/spill -

nothing found. EMailed Dennis

McBride of EVMWD regarding odor

for their follow-up. (new pump

station 'down wind' of the odor, a

coincidence?) 8/6/2015 rkt - phone

call with Dennis McBride - crew sent

to area - nothing found. 8/7/2015 rkt -

notified PW Staff to let me know of

any report of odor from area.

8/14/2015 rkt - nothing new to report -

file closed.

Resolved

8/4/2015 rkt - rec'd report from code

enforcement - anonymous complaint.

Oil in driveway being washed down

into street with a hose

Oil - Nothing measurable

noted

RKT & Scott Rippstein visited site. 2

small oil stains in driveway, no other

evidence of spills in driveway or

'washing down' into storm drain. No

answer at door. sent letter, educational

material, brochure and oil cleanup

flyer to home.

Resolved

8/5/2015 rkt - rec'd call from RC Hazmat of

potential illegal dump site containing

35 gal drums and 5 gal drums of

unknown contents on vacant lot off of

Cereal St. - emailed photos to me.

Potential discharge

conditions - nothing

discharging

Rkt - based on location description

and photos, it appeared to be the

LEMX site at 2700 Cereal St. Called

business general manager, Chad

Escobedo and informed him of report.

8/18/2015 rkt - Chad took containers

to

http://www.cityoftemecula.org/Temec

ula/Residents/TrashRecycling/Univers

alWaste.htm facility in Temecula, no

receipt given.

Resolved

8/10/2015 - rec'd anonymous call alleging

vehicle leaking oil onto street.

Oil - Nothing measurable

noted

RKT unable to go; sent code

enforcement Fred Lopez. Fred

advised resident to move vehicle off

street, park in driveway with drip pan

under to collect oil. Discussed dry

cleanup methods with resident.

Resolved

Lake Elsinore



8/13/2015 rkt - drove to site, nothing

on street; oil cleaned up.

8/12/2015 - rkt rec'ed report of oil on ground at

509 pottery from City Code Enf;

unable to locate address in gis;

confirmed correct address is 502

Pottery.

Nothing to be seen rkt - drove to site - no evidence on

ground.

Resolved

9/3/2015 rkt - rec'd report of possible septic

discharge. EVMWD on the scene to

clean up/pump up any discharge.

Robert Barnard 951-434-1025

10 gals of clear liquid. - No

odor

rkt - drove to site, confirmed 3rd

manhole cover from driveway

discharging clear liquid. Pond and

heavy vegetation around manhole.

Spoke with John Martin, adjacent

business owner. Leach field failure.

Advised to contact septic company

that day and get the system repaired

and/or pumped out. He stated he

would comply. Letter sent to confirm

conversation; EVMWD notified of

issue. 9/5/2015- Drove to site; all

clear.

Resolved

11/9/2015 rkt - received email complaint of

residents at the subject address

pouring concrete in the front yard and

spilling it all over the sidewalk and

into the street.

Absorbent spread on oil

stain

11/9/2015 Ed C. went to site - no sign

of wet cement in street or sidewalk.

No fresh cement work evident in front

of property. 11/10/2015 rkt - visited

site - observed what appeared to be

remains of absorbent spread on a spill

in the street. Spoke with home owner

- she will get it cleaned up, doesn't

know where it came from. I provided

education on dry cleanup and water

quality.

Resolved

11/24/2015 rkt - rec'd report of white powdery

substance flowing down Teakwood St

and Terra Cotta Streets into the flood

control channel that leads into the

Lake. Cars driving into driveways and

garages transfer it into property.

Diametatous Earth -

Nothing measurable noted

rkt - drove to site - traced "white

powdery" discharge up the street to

source at 15159 Knolllwood. No one

answered the door; left card,

stormwater pollution prevention

brochure and sent letter advising of

pollution potential. Substance

appeared to be diamateatious earth

from pool filter backwash.

Resolved

12/8/2015 - Code Enf. rec'd report - subject

address is having a pool installed and

the contractor cleaned their concrete

waste into the street/gutter. Also, the

complainant stated the contractor's

Dust/Dirt - Nothing

measurable noted

Code Enf. Officer - Fred Lopez went

to site. Reported on 12/10/2015: I

didn't see anything to be concerned

about, there's some residual dust/dirt

but nothing that appears to be

Resolved

Lake Elsinore

Lake Elsinore



equipment failed and blew/leaked oil

all over the street.

hazardous. (RKT out ill on day of

report - code enf. responded)

1/11/2016 Report of trash overflowing trash

container in multi family unit and

manager using a trash enclosure for

storage instead of trash bin

Nothing measurable noted checked with CR&R and planning

regarding trash container

requirements. 1/12/2016 visited site -

12 apts, 2 bins. 1 container leaking, 3

trash enclosures, 2 used for containers

1 for storage. 1 missing doors, trash

& debris on ground in one. Evidence

that some cleanup is being done,

maintenance worker sweeping

container.

Resolved

1/13/2016 rkt - rec'd call from RC DEH

regarding possible sewage discharge.

RCDEH investigated site and spoke

with site manager - Jerry Nix. Nix

claimed 'water line break/discharge',

not sewage.

Possible black water.

Contained in 'excavated

pit'.

RKT visited site - Spoke w/ Mr. Nix

Confirmed water leak, however, trailer

sewage pipe was cut to get to water

pipe leak; some sewage discharged

into pit, mixed with water. Mr. Nix

hosed down the road towards the lake.

Advised Mr. Nix not to wash down to

lake. Use dry cleanup methods.

Construction 'pit' filled with water

mixed with sewage. Advised to drain

and dispose of into sanitary sewer.

Advised to construct berm in future to

capture/limit exposure. Use bleach

on asphalt and lime on dirt surfaces.

Sent Notice of Violation to property

owner.

Resolved

1/26/2016 rkt - rec'd information from staff that

Mr. Bullock called to complain of

runoff in street from vacant property

behind the tract development.

Overgrown WQ facility 3/10/2016 rkt - v-ditches cleared;

graffiti cleaned off. 1/27/2016 rkt -

drove to site w/ PW Inspector, Scott

Rippstein. No discharge observed in

street. Noted disintegrating sand bags,

overgrown debris basin, broken

fences, clogged v-ditches and

excessive graffiti. Notified PW Dept

to clean up sand bags (they were

placed several years ago to mitigate

flows from vacant property resulting

from fire.) Conducted research -

determined that property owner,

Michael Mitchell responsible for

maintenance of debris basin and v-

ditches. 3/9/16 - Mr. Mitchell

Resolved Lake Elsinore



contracted to have site cleaned. City

notified to clean graffiti.

2/2/2016 rkt rec'd report of oil running down

driveway into street.

Nothing measurable noted rkt - visited site - no evidence of

discharge; spoke with homeowner - no

knowledge of discharge. Advised of

pollution prevention and discharges

going to lake.

Resolved

2/4/2016 rkt - rec'd voice mail of oil spill in

street running down gutter, no address

given.

Vehicle oil - Nothing

measurable noted -

discharge had occurred

sometime ago.

2/4/16 rkt called back for address,

lvm. 2/4/16 resident called with

address, stated spill appeared to be

accidental. 2/4/16 rkt drove to site-

spoke with resident "Nick". Walked

around outside, confirmed location of

possible spill and how it ran down the

gutter; spill soaked into asphalt and

concrete. Nick had no knowledge of it

occurring, perhaps something from the

trash spilled when it was dumped.

Cannot trace to home as the spill

appears to original in the street infront

of the driveway, not on the property.

Gave Nick information on cleaning up

oil spills. Directed him to place

something under vehicle onsite that

was leaking - watched him do so.

Resolved

3/24/2016 - rkt rec'd phone call - white

substance in street running around

corner in front of his house. Wants

City to clean up. Area of Beechwood

& Palomar

Diametaeous Earth from

pool filter - Nothing

measurable noted

rkt - drove to area - located source of

discharge - curb core from 19480

Palomar- took photos. NO one home,

went back to office - prepared letter -

drove back to site to deliver -

homeowner home - advised of illegal

discharge and to clean up using dry

methods. 3/30/2016 rkt returned to

area – cleaned up and hung pool and

spa brochures in neighborhood.

Resolved

3/29/2016 rkt- rec'd report of numerous vehicles

parking in front of homes (hers and

neighbors) and leaking oil into street

vehicle oil - Nothing

measurable noted

3/30/2016 rkt - drove to site. minor

stains in front of 4011 ash and

throughout neighborhood. Checked

under 3 vehicles parking in front of

Ash - no active discharge noted.

Distributed flyers on oil

cleanup/prevention throughout

neighborhood. 4/18/2016 rkt - rec'd

email from Paulie, alleging neighbor

parking leaking SUV in front of her

Resolved

Lake Elsinore



home and it is leaking. Photos

attached of SUV, nothing shows WET

active leaking. Visited area - 4011 did

not answer door. 4/20/2016 rkt rec'd

email from Paulie - alleging SUV

currently parking in front of her home

and leaking asked me to fine them.

drove to site; SUV there; no WET

active leaking noted. Notified Paulie

of findings.

3/30/2016 - rkt in area on another complaint;

excessive accumulation of oil in front

of property.


measurable noted

No answer at door. Sent NOV letter

w/ 2 wks to clean up. 4/4/16 rec'd call

from homeowner alleging not her

vehicle/neighbor's. 4/6/2016 rkt -

visited site - evidence of cleanup

begun. Truck parking in front actively

leaking - told to clean it up. Eddy

placed container under truck to

capture leak. 4/20/2016 rkt - drove by

site - no leaking vehicles; evidence of

cleanup.

Resolved

4/18/2016 Neighbor's vehicle parking under

street light leaking fluid. Neighbor

not home during day.


measurable noted

RKT - drove to site, confirmed

oil/fluid staining and neighbor not

home. Distributed flyers throughout

neighborhood re motor oil as pollutant

and how to clean/prevent.

Resolved

4/18/2016 Emailed neighbor leaking oil on

street- included photo of oil stains on

street.

vehicle oil Nothing

measurable noted

Emailed resident - will open

investigation; forwarded email to

Code Enf. for additional action.

Resolved

4/27/2016 reported oil leaking from neighbor's

car.

Nothing measurable noted RKT drove to site - no evidence of

leaking vehicle - no 'fresh' oil stains.

Emailed resident that I will conduct

random checks.

Resolved

4/28/2016 Spot check of neighborhood, observed

fresh oil stain under vehicle, touched

and confirmed oil, vehicle oil pan had

drip forming and was covered in oil.

Drips of vehicle oil Left Notice of Violation on vehicle;

resident, Renee Cummings tried to

deny the vehicle was dripping (son's,

girlfriend's car) I indicated I had

photos. The drip needs to be cleaned

and something put under the vehicle to

capture the oil. She agreed to take

action. Drove to site – no discharge.

Resolved

5/2/2016 Report of stockpiles of dirt on vacant

property

dirt. Nothing measurable

noted

RKT sent Scott Rippstein PW

Inspector out to site. He spoke with

owner - advised that the stockpiles

needed to be 'gone' or protected. No

Resolved

Lake Elsinore



grading permit for site. Owner came

into City to inquire about NPDES

requirements with RKT. Relocating

to this site from other site in City -

recently purchased lot and was

cleaning it up. 5/2/2016 AM - dirt

being removed - followed truck to

make sure not being dumped in City.

5/2/2016 PM Some BMPs are in

place - 5/9/2016 - BMPs in place;

stockpile remaining protected.

5/5/2016 Fire hydrant hit by truck in loading

area; washed mud into Malaga.

water from fire hydrant

gallons of water

discharged.

Visited site - spoke w/ plumber - he is

aware of NPDES requirements. Gave

me name and # of property manager.

Spoke w/ property manager; she will

have her lot cleaner clean up dirt

today.

Resolved

5/5/2016 report of diesel fuel spill onto City

street (Lakeshore). Spill came from

Hakes Door & Sash vehicle.

Diesel fuel - Less than 1 qt. Investigated site - notified Hakes Door

& Sash to either pay for City cleanup

or cleanup themselves. Ensured safety

measures in place - watched cleanup.

Resolved

5/18/2016 - rec'd report of neighbor's vehicle

parking in front of her home leaking

oil onto street in front of her home.


measurable noted

RKT visited site - no vehicle on street;

no 'new' oil staining on street. 5/23

drove by - no vehicle on street, no

new oil; 5/24 drove by, no vehicle on

street, no new oil; 5/26 drove by no

new oil on street, no vehicle on street.

Resolved

5/23/2016 Report of oil discharge from vehicle in

driveway and street.


measurable noted

No evidence of new/fresh oil

discharge in driveway or street; no

leaking vehicles. Left information on

cleanup. 5/24/2016 - rechecked site,

no evidence of 'fresh/new' discharges;

evidence of kitty litter being used to

clean up existing/old stains.

Resolved

11/10/215 Discharge of motor oil in street. vehicle oil - Nothing

measurable noted

Some staining on ground, nothing

flowing.

Resolved

Menifee

Incident

Date


9/9/15 NPDES 15.01.040 Motor oil reported. No active discharge observed. Closed (PW)

10/7/15 NPDES 15.01.040 Sediment. Top soil and

vegetation was removed at

Okoma at Evans Road

resulting in erosion.

City issued a stop work order to the

property resident requiring him to

limit his blading.

Closed (PW)

11/5/15 NPDES 15.01.040 Dirty wash water from

mobile dog groomer

City issued a Public Works request to

investigate the discharge.

In Progress (PW)

Lake Elsinore



Perry's Pets observed in

street. Truck released ~50

gallons wash water to the

street when grooming

onsite.

1/22/16 NPDES 15.01.040 Greywater illicit

connection to street.

A notice to correct was issued to the

resident. The resident disconnected

the hose and cleaned remaining

greywater (coming from washing

machine). Resident has plans to

connect hose to septic system. Plans

were approved by City on 2/3/16.

Closed (PW)

4/25/16 NPDES 15.01.040 Orange-colored sediment,

wash water discharging to

street.

City issued letter to discharger about

storm water requirements.

Closed (PW)

5/11/2016 NPDES 15.01.040 Sewage leak from septic

tank and clean out box

discharging at Norma Dr.

The County issued a Notice of

Violation to the property owner.

System was required to be repaired

and properly permitted.

Closed (PW)

5/16/16 NPDES 15.01.040 About 2-3 gallons of water

with trace amounts of soap

from car wash discharging

to MS4.

Inspector provided verbal warning

during inspection. Business agreed to

install additional BMPs.

Closed (IndComm)

5/17/2016 NPDES 15.01.040 Soapy water from

maintenance hose

discharging to private

storm drain.

Inspector discussed requirements for

storm water, also spoke with

maintenance personnel Martha about

discontinuing use of hose.

In Progress

(IndComm)

5/17/2016 NPDES 15.01.040 Evidence of spills in shared

dumpster area discharging

to private storm drain.

Inspector discussed requirements for

storm water and provided verbal

warning.

In Progress

(IndComm)

5/19/2016 NPDES 15.01.040 Soap, grease, and trash

from washing of trash

enclosure discharging to

private landscape drain.


during inspection. General manager

reported that washing of this area

would cease and area was cleaned.

Closed (IndComm)

5/19/2016 NPDES 15.01.040 Evidence of dirty wash

water from vehicle

washing reaching the

street.


during inspection.

Closed (IndComm)

5/19/2016 NPDES 15.01.040 Irrigation runoff

approximately 10 gallons

to three private storm

drains.

Inspector performed full inspection at

Lowe's Garden Center and notified

business of requirements to minimize

irrigation runoff.

Closed (IndComm)

5/20/2016 NPDES 15.01.040 Evidence of illicit

discharge to City street of

Inspector notified business of

evidence observed and the

In Progress

(IndComm)

Menifee



dirty wash water from

uncontained vehicle

washing.

requirement to contain wash water.

Business reported the issue resolved.

5/26/2016 NPDES 15.01.040 Approximately 100 gallons

leaked from pond or

reservoir putting water

with significant amounts of

algae and sediment onto

Palomar Road.

City is in process of completing

response to complaint.

In Progress (PW)

5/26/2016 NPDES 15.01.040 Sediment and water

discharge to storm drain on

Sun City Blvd near McCall

Blvd.

City is in process of completing

response to complaint.

In Progress (PW)

6/2/2016 NPDES 15.01.040 Vehicle washing

discharging sediment and

dirty water (~10 gallons) to

Watson Road.

Inspector notified business of

violation and worked with them to

correct deficiencies.

Closed (IndComm)

6/21/2016 NPDES 15.01.040 Sediment causing damage

and buildup to storm drain

system at La Piedra Drive.

City inspected the neighboring

western property (Grower's Choice)

and no significant rills were observed

coming from the western property.

Still, the City addressed the issue

immediately and cleaned the inlet and

required inlet protection.

Closed (PW)

Moreno Valley

Incident

Date Violation Pollutants/Quantity Enforcement Action(s) Disposition

INSPECTION AREA: 3

07/13/2015 APN# 487-550-001: ILLEGAL

DUMPING (TV) No violations observed. No action needed.

C15-02392

Case Closed

07/27/2015

09/17/2015

APN# 487-470-028 PROPERTY

MAINTENANCE:

OVERGROWN WEEDS,

DISCARDED HOUSEHOLD

ITEMS (TIRES, BOXES, SOFA

CUSHIONS, A MATTRESS) IN

PUBLIC VIEW

Observed tires, boxes, sofa

cushions, a mattress and

weeds on the property.

Notice of Violation & Administrative Citation

Issued to owner. Items removed by property

owner.

C15-03174

Case closed 10/20/2015

Menifee



09/17/2015

APN# 487-470-025 PROPERTY

MAINTENANCE:

OVERGROWN WEEDS,

DISCARDED HOUSEHOLD

ITEMS (MATTRESSES, A

COUCH ) IN PUBLIC VIEW,

SHOPPING CART

Observed mattresses, a couch

and a shopping cart on the

vacant lot along with weeds.

Notice of Violation & Administrative Citation

Issued to owner. Items removed by property

owner.

C15-03176 Case

closed 10/20/2015

10/27/2015

APN# 478-090-007

PROPERTY MAINTENANCE:

OVERGROWN WEEDS,

ILLEGAL DUMPING AT

VACANT LOT

Observed dumping/trash and

debris and weeds/overgrown

vegetation.

Notice of Violation Issued. Items removed by

property owner.

C15-03642

Case Closed

11/09/2015

01/04/2016

APN #487-574-001 ILLEGAL

DUMPING AND

TRASH/DEBRIS IN PUBLIC

VIEW

ON VACANT LOT

Observed no dumping on the

property. No action needed

C16-00010

Case Closed

01/20/2016

01/06/2016 APN# 484-030-026 - VACANT

LOT - ILLEGAL DUMPING

Observed trash and debris on

the property.

Notice of Violation issued to owner. Items

removed by property owner.

C16-00046

Case Closed

01/25/2016

01/06/2016 APN# 484-030-016 - VACANT



the property.



C16-00048

Case Closed

01/25/2016

01/06/2016 APN# 478-120-015 - VACANT



the property.



C16-00049

Case Closed

01/25/2016

01/06/2016 APN# 478-120-023 - VACANT



the property.



C16-00051

Case Closed

01/25/2016

01/06/2016 APN# 478-240-015 - VACANT



the property.



C16-00052

Case Closed

01/25/2016

01/06/2016 APN# 478-240-016 - VACANT



the property.



C16-00053

Case Closed

01/25/2016

02/02/2016 APN# 487-470-028 - ILLEGAL

DUMPING

Observed discarded furniture,

concrete rubble, household

waste, green waste, used tires

and spent building material.



C16-00392

Case Closed

06/10/2016

Moreno Valley



02/19/2016

APN# 487-470-022 -

ILLEGALLY DUMPED JUNK,

TRASH, AND DEBRIS

Observed plastic car pieces,

trash, two mattresses, plastic

crates and gas cans.

Two Notices of Violation issued to property

owner. Items removed by property owner.

C16-00554

Case Closed

03/11/2016

03/22/2016

APN# 479-230-027 - ILLEGAL

DUMPING: MATTRESS & BOX

SPRING; HOLE IN FENCE

No violations observed. No action needed.

C16-00966

Case Closed

06/01/2016

05/09/2016

APN# 484-020-006 - TRASH

DUMPING IN VACANT LOT

BRODIAEA & PERRIS

Observed trash and debris,

including boxes, tires and

plastic containers



C16-01715

Case Closed

06/14/2016

05/17/2016

APN# 478-182-010 - ILLEGAL

DUMPING (LARGE PILES OF

WOOD) FIRE HAZARD


C16-01825

Case Closed

06/01/2016

03/04/2016 APN#484-223-006 - ILLEGAL

DUMPING No violations observed. No action needed.

C16-00731

Case Closed

03/19/2016

01/06/2016 APN# 484-030-022 - VACANT

LOT - ILLEGAL DUMPING Observed trash and debris.



C16-00045

Case Closed

01/25/2016

01/06/2016 APN# 484-030-013 - VACANT

LOT - ILLEGAL DUMPING Observed trash and debris.



C16-00044

Case Closed

01/25/2016

06/11/2016

APN#484-020-026 -

UNPERMITTED DONATION

BINS

Observed unpermitted

donation bins.



C16-02285

Case Closed

08/26/2016

INSPECTION AREA: 1

07/16/2015 APN# 259-260-082 - ILLEGAL

DUMPING

Observed junk, trash and

debris.

Officer provided photos and corresponded

directly with property owner. Items removed

by property owner.

C15-02441

Case Closed

08/13/2015

07/29/2015

APN# 259-430-020 -

HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS;

ILLEGAL DUMPING; DUST

CONTROL; VECTOR ISSUE

No violations observed. No action needed. Case flagged to monitor

repeat unfounded complaints by RP.

C15-02551

Case Closed

07/31/2015

04/18/2016

APN# 264-236-001 - ILLEGAL

DUMPING; TRASH/DEBRIS;

MATRESSES AND SOFA.

VACANT LOT


C16-01265

Case Closed

09/24/2016

05/21/2016 APN# 259-240-062 - ILLEGAL

DUMPING ON PROPERTY Observed pipes and trash.



C16-01931

Case Closed

06/10/2016

05/25/2016

APN# 259-421-002 - ILLEGAL

DUMPING (CHEMICAL

STORAGE); PROPERTY

MAINTENANCE(STRONG

ODOR)

No violations observed.

Incorrect assignment of

priority of violation. Private

residence. Correct Violation

is Property Maintenance and

Discarded Household Items.

No action needed. Case flagged to monitor

repeat unfounded complaints by RP.

C16-02020

Case Closed 06/02/2016

Moreno Valley



10/15/2015 APN# 475-190-022 - ILLEGAL


C15-03516

Case Closed

11/05/2015

12/02/2015

APN# 481-341-032 - REMOVE

TRASH AND DEBRIS DUMPED

ON THE PROPERTY


priority of violation.

Private residence. Correct violation should

have been coded as Property Maintenance,

Pool Maintenance, and Trash/Debris

C15-03965

Case Closed

07/14/2016

04/19/2016

23779 PARKLAND AVE -

PROPERTY MAINTENANCE;

ILLEGAL DUMPING; TWO

SOFAS IN ALLEY

Observed two discarded

couches in the alley.

Two Notices of Violation & one

Administrative Citation issued to property


C16-01294

Case Closed

09/17/2016

10/21/2015 APN# 475-150-003 - ILLEGAL

DUMPING ON VACANT LOT No violations observed. No action needed.

C15-03575

Case Closed

11/05/2015

INSPECTION AREA: 7

APN# 263-160-001 -

DISCARDED HOUSEHOLD

ITEMS, CLOTHES, TRASH,

AND OTHER DEBRIS

Observed discarded

household items, clothes,

trash, and other debris.

Notice to Contact & Notice of Violation

issued to property owner. Items removed by

property owner.

C15-02460

Case Closed

08/16/2015

01/31/2016

APN# 263-070-040 -

DISCARDED FURNITURE,

TIRES, AND OTHER TRASH,

AND DEBRIS ON VACANT

PARCEL


tires, and other debris on the

vacant parcel.

No action needed. Items removed by

property owner.

C16-00356

Case Closed

02/17/2016

03/14/2016

COTTONWOOD, EAST OF

EDGEMONT ST- ILLEGAL

DUMPING: 2 MATTRESSES &

CABINET

Observed discarded furniture

on the sidewalk.

Notice to Contact issued. Items removed by

Public Works Maintenance and Operations.

C16-00834

Case Closed

03/17/2016

06/21/2016

HIGHWAY 215 PUBLIC RIGHT

OF WAY - ILLEGAL

CAMPING, DISCARDED

HOUSEHOLD ITEMS, TENT,

CLOTHING, OR OTHER

PERSONAL ITEMS ON CITY

OWNED PROPERTY

Observed a tent and

encampment set-up.

Notice to Abate and two Notices to Contact

issued to property owner/transient. Items

removed by property owner/transient.

C16-02447

Case Closed

07/05/2016

06/28/2016

HIGHWAY 215 PUBLIC

RIGHT-OF-WAY @ 215/ C -

TRAVEL (VEHICLE) TRAILER

PARKED ON CITY PROPERTY

Observed a Travel (vehicle)

Trailer with an electrical

extension cord running to the

vehicle from the adjacent

property APN# #263-190-

001, signage and other street

maintenance equipment.

Two Notices to Contact and a Notice of

Violation issued to APN# #263-190-001.

Items removed by adjacent parcel owner.

C16-02514

Case Closed

07/10/2016

06/11/2016

APN# 263-220-015 -


BINS


donation bins on property.

Two Notice of Violations issued to property


C16-02280

Case Closed

07/15/2016

Moreno Valley



06/11/2016

APN# 263-230-024 -


BINS





C16-02278

Case Closed

08/12/2016

01/28/2016 APN# 291-191-007 - HOMELESS

ENCAMPMENT

Observed a homeless

encampment.

Notice to Abate issued. Items removed by

City Public Works Maintenance and

Operations.

C16-00335

Case Closed

02/08/2016

01/27/2016

APN# 291-191-008 VACANT

PARCEL - DISCARDED

HOUSEHOLD ITEMS,

FURNITURE, TRASH, AND

OTHER DEBRIS

Observed a possible homeless

encampment, and a large

amount of trash, debris,

furniture, and other discarded

items.

Notice to Abate issued. Items removed by


Operations.

C16-00311

Case Closed

02/02/2016

06/20/2016

APN# 291-191-011 - ILLEGAL

CAMPING, TRASH, DEBRIS

AND OTHER DISCARDED

HOUSEHOLD ITEMS

Observed an illegal

encampment.

Two Notices to Contact and a Notice to

Abate issued. Items removed by City Public

Works Maintenance and Operations.

C16-02435

Case Closed

08/23/2016

APN# 291-294-024 -


BINS





C16-02279

Case Closed

07/15/2016

06/11/2016

APN# 296-280-010 -


BINS





C16-02282

Case Closed

08/12/2016

06/11/2016

APN# 296-300-002 -


BINS





C16-02283

Case Closed

08/11/2016

06/11/2016

APN# 296-300-005 -


BINS



Notice of Violation issued to property owner.

Items removed by property owner.

C16-02284

Case Closed

06/30/2016

07/28/2015

APN# 263-230-004 -


TRASH, AND OTHER

HOUSEHOLD ITEMS IN

VACANT LOT


trash, and debris.

Notice to Contact and Notice of Violation

issued to property owner. Items removed by

property owner.

C15-02540

Case Closed

08/16/2015

10/07/2015

APN# 263-230-004 -


TRASH, AND DEBRIS ON

VACANT LOT


trash, and debris.

Two Notices to Contact and a Notice of

violation issued to the property owner. Items


C15-03401

Case Closed

12/14/2015

08/09/2015

APN# 291-283-027 -

DISCARDED TRASH, DEBRIS,

LITTER AND OTHER REFUSE

IN ALLEY

Observed a large amount of

trash, debris, litter, and other

refuse in alley.


issued to the property owner. Items removed

by property owner.

C15-02673

Case Closed

08/25/2015

07/07/2015

APN# 297-150-033 -

DISCARDED TIRES, TRASH,

AND DEBRIS

Observed approx. 150

discarded passenger vehicle

tires.


issued to the property owner. Items removed

by property owner.

C15-02344

Case Closed

07/23/2015

Moreno Valley



09/27/2015

APN#263-120-020 -

DISCARDED FURNITURE

(COUCH)

Observed a discarded couch.

Notice to Contact, three Notice of Violations

and Administrative Citation issued to the

property owner. Items removed by property

owner.

C15-03283

Case Closed

02/02/2016

06/11/2016

APN# 263-220-024 -


BINS





C16-02281

Case Closed

08/26/2016

INSPECTION AREA: 2

08/06/2015

REDLANDS BLVD NEAR

EQUESTRIAN CTR - ILLEGAL

DUMPING (MANURE)


C15-02636

Case Closed

08/11/2015

08/12/2015

CRYSTAL HILL ROAD -

DEBRIS DUMPED ON

VACANT LOT

Observed debris (photo of

discarded furniture) dumped

on vacant lot.


property owner.

C15-02740

Case Closed

08/27/2015

08/12/2015 APN# 474-210-006 - DEBRIS

DUMPED ON VACANT LOT /

CRYSTAL HILL ROAD AT

EARLEY WAY

Observed debris (photo of

discarded carpet) dumped on

vacant lot.


property owner.

C15-02743

Case Closed

08/27/2015

08/12/2015

APN # 474-210-001 - COUCH

DUMPED ON VACANT LOT /

AT THE TOP OF EARLEY WAY

Observed discarded couch

dumped on vacant lot.


property owner.

C15-02744

Case Closed

08/26/2015

08/18/2015 APN#474-590-036 - ILLEGAL

DUMPING AT VACANT LOT

Observed debris on vacant

lot.


property owner.

C15-02803

Case Closed

09/17/2016

08/18/2015 APN# 474-410-029 - ILLEGAL

DUMPING (18 TIRES)

Observed illegal dumping (18

tires).


property owner.

C15-02809

Case Closed

08/26/2015

10/13/2015

APN# 473-220-017 -

PROJECTION TV DISCARDED

ROADSIDE

Observed a projection TV

discarded roadside.

Emailed Public Works Maintenance and

Operations for bulk item pick-up. Items

removed by City Public Works Maintenance

and Operations.

C15-03483

Case Closed

10/28/2015

10/19/2015

APN# 474-271-008 - DEBRIS

DUMPED BESIDE ROAD /

DALEHURST NORTH OF

IRONWOOD


lot.




and Operations.

C15-03550

Case Closed

11/03/2015

11/05/2015 APN# 487-370-002 - DEBRIS

DUMPED ON PROPERTY No violations observed. No action needed.

C15-03737

Case Closed

11/05/2015

11/13/2015

APN# 474-110-004 - ILLEGAL

DUMPING: CONSTRUCTION

MATERIAL & DISCARDED

HOUSEHOLD ITEMS


lot.



C15-03824

Case Closed

12/30/2015

11/18/2015 APN# 474-110-014 - DEBRIS ON

VACANT LOT

Observed discarded couch

and debris on vacant lot.



C15-03847

Case Closed

12/29/2015

Moreno Valley



01/22/2016

BETWEEN APN# 488-080-011

AND 488-080-024 ON TRAIL -

ILLEGAL DUMPING


lot.

Invalid APN#. New case opened at correct

APN#488-080-011

C16-00268

Case Closed

01/26/2016

01/26/2016 APN# 488-080-011DEBRIS

DUMPED ON VACANT LO


lot.


property owner.

C16-00293

Case Closed

02/10/2016

01/28/2016

APN# # 473-174-008 ILLEGAL

DUMPING ON VACANT

PARCEL


C16-00325

Case Closed

01/28/2016

02/02/2016 APN# # 473-160-017 - ILLEGAL

DUMPING BEHIND TREE LINE


vacant lot.


property owner.

C16-00386

Case Closed

02/26/2016

02/10/2016

APN# 473-220-017 -

DISCARDED BOAT, TRAILER

AND DEBRIS ON VACANT

PARCEL

Observed trash, debris,

abandoned boat and trailer on

vacant lot.


property owner.

C16-00473

Case Closed

04/05/2016

03/05/2016 APN# 474-110-004 - ILLEGAL

DUMPING IN VACANT

PARCEL (MATTRESS,

TRASH/DEBRIS, CEMENT

BLOCKS)


lot.

Two Notices of Violation and Administrative

Citation issued to property owner. Items


C16-00749 Case Closed

05/23/2016

03/08/2016

IRONWOOD @ HIGHLAND /

NORTHWEST CORNER -

BOTTLES OF OIL DUMPED

BESIDE ROAD

Observed bottles of oil

dumped beside road.


Operations for pick-up. Items removed by


Operations.

C16-00774

Case Closed

03/23/2016

03/08/2016

NORTHWEST CORNER OF

IRONWOOD @ HIGHLAND -

PALM FRONDS DUMPED

BESIDE ROAD

Observed palm fronds

dumped beside road.




and Operations.

C16-00775

Case Closed

03/23/2016

03/19/2016

ROCKSPUR X KALMIA -

ILLEGAL DUMPING: 2

MATTRESSES

Observed discarded

mattresses on the side of the

road.




and Operations.

C16-00931

Case Closed

04/12/2016

03/21/2016 APN# 474-220-070 - DEBRIS

DUMPED ON VACANT LOT


lot.


property owner.

C16-00940 Case Closed

04/12/2016

03/23/2016 APN# 473-174-008 - PILE OF

DIRT DUMPED BESIDE ROAD No violations observed. No action needed.

C16-00979

Case Closed

03/23/2016

04/13/2016

APN# 488-080-024 - ILLEGAL

DUMPING (DISCARDED

HOUSEHOLD ITEMS)

Observed items left from

recent weed abatement by

Fire Prevention contractor.

Contacted Fire Prevention. Items removed by

Fire Prevention Contractor.

C16-01189

Case Closed

04/28/2016

04/19/2016

SOUTHEAST CORNER OF

IRONWOOD @ HIGHLAND -

TRASH/DEBRIS DUMPED

BESIDE ROADWAY

Observed discarded debris by

the roadside.




Operations.

C16-01271

Case Closed

05/04/2016

Moreno Valley



05/03/2016

APN # 488-260-023 - DEBRIS

DUMPED ON VACANT

PARCEL


lot.


property owner.

C16-01637

Case Closed

06/08/2016

05/03/2016

SOUTHSIDE OF IRONWOOD

BETWEEN HIGHLAND &

THEODORE - CANS OF PAINT

DUMPED SOUTH SIDE OF

IRONWOOD BETWEEN

HIGHLAND AND THEODORE

Observed dumped paint cans.




Operations.

C16-01638

Case Closed

05/23/2016

05/10/2016

SOUTHSIDE OF IRONWOOD

BEFORE HIGHLAND - DEBRIS

DUMPED BESIDE THE ROAD

Observed debris on side of

road.




Operations.

C16-01739

Case Closed

06/09/2016

06/14/2016 COUCHES DUMPED /

SUNNYMEAD @ PEACHLEAF Observed dumped couches.




Operations.

C16-02305

Case Closed

06/29/2016

06/21/2016

APN# 473-160-004 - DEBRIS

DUMPED ON VACANT

PARCEL


lot.



C16-02453

Case Closed

09/09/2016

06/21/2016 APN# 473-160-017 - DEBRIS

DUMPED ON VACANT LOT


lot.


property owner.

C16-02454

Case Closed

07/14/2016

04/12/2016

APN# 422-070-035 - JUNK,

TRASH AND DEBRIS BEING

DUMPED ON PROPERTY


C16-01164

Case Closed

05/12/2016

08/12/2015

APN# 474-210-011 - DEBRIS

DUMPED ON SOUTH END OF

PROPERTY


lot.



C15-02741

Case Closed

10/06/2015

07/31/2015

APN# 473-220-074 - OWNER

TRIMMING TREES AND

LEAVING BRANCHES

ROADSIDE FOR PUBLIC

WORKS TO REMOVE

Observed discarded tree

trimmings.

Administrative Citation issued to PO. Items


C15-02600

Case Closed

08/14/2015

04/28/2016

APN#474-130-012 - PROPERTY

MAINTENANCE; ILLEGAL

DUMPING (SEWAGE);

ILLEGAL OCCUPATION

(TRAILER)


C16-01510

Case Closed

04/28/2016

03/03/2016

APN#479-030-046 -

TRASH/DEBRIS, ILLEGAL

DUMPING, PROPERTY

MAINTENANCE, DISCARDED

HOUSEHOLD ITEMS




property owner.

C16-00709

Case Closed

03/31/2016

Moreno Valley



07/14/2015

APN# 479-030-047 -

DISCARDED TIRE AND

MATTRESS IN REAR

LOT/ALLEY

Observed discarded mattress

and tires.



C15-02420

Case Closed

09/23/2015

05/03/2016

APN#479-030-047 - TRASH /

DEBRIS IN ALLEY BEHIND

DOLLAR TREE

Observed trash and debris in

alley.



C16-01624

Case Closed

06/08/2016

03/15/2016

APN# 487-072-014 - ILLEGAL

DUMPING: TRASH/DEBRIS &

BUCKETS OF FLUIDS IN REAR

OF PROPERTY BEHIND GATE

Observed trash, debris, and

buckets of fluids.

Warning issued to property owner. Items


C16-00872

Case Closed

04/14/2016

INSPECTION AREA: 8

08/10/2015 APN# 264-030-008 - ILLEGAL


C15-02679

Case Closed

09/11/2015

01/28/2016

APN# 292-126-012 -

DISCARDED HOUSEHOLD

ITEMS, DILAPIDATED

FENCING, PROPERTY

MAINTENANCE, AND

VEHICLES PARKING ON

UNIMPROVED SURFACES.


priority of violation. Private residence.

C16-00328

ACTIVE

04/06/2016

APN# 296-125-002 - ILLEGAL

DUMPING; TRASH/DEBRIS;

LARGE WATER HEATER

SAFETY HAZARD



C16-01120

Case Closed

04/08/2016

02/09/2016

APN# 292-031-012 - IMPROPER

DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS

MATERIALS (OIL DISCARDED

INTO CITY GUTTER)

Observed improper disposal

of hazardous material (oil).

Notice to abate issued to property owner.

Waste cleaned by property owner.

C16-00456

Case Closed

02/12/2016

w

08/17/2015

SUNNYMEAD BL @

PEACHLEAF ST - ILLEGAL

DUMPING, DISCARDED

HOUSEHOLD ITEMS

(MATTRESS)

Observed discarded mattress.




and Operations.

C15-02786

Case Closed

08/19/2015

08/19/2015 PETTIT @ JUNIPER - TV

DUMPED IN STREET

Observed dump TV in

roadway.




and Operations.

C15-02828

Case Closed

09/03/2015

09/28/2015

ON HIGHLAND BL BETWEEN

ORANGE GROVE & IR -

DEBRIS DUMPED BESIDE

ROAD

Observed discarded debris by

the roadside.




and Operations.

C15-03297

Case Closed

10/13/2015

Moreno Valley



12/10/2015

SINCLAIR @ IRONWOOD -

DISCARDED FURNITURE ON

VACANT LOT

Observed discarded furniture.




and Operations.

C15-04083

Case Closed

12/30/2015

06/07/2016

PETTIT ST @ AUTO CENTER

DR - DEBRIS IN PROW /

PETTIT ST @ AUTO CENTER

DR

Observed discarded debris.




and Operations.

C16-02208

Case Closed

07/18/2016

06/20/2016

IN PROW ACROSS FROM

11730 MATHEWS - DUMPING

IN PROW / LAWN CHAIR &

BEER BOTTLES / ACROSS

FROM 11730 MATHEWS

Observed discarded lawn

chair and beer bottles.




Operations.

C16-02431

Case Closed

07/12/2016

06/20/2016 BAGS OF TREE TRIMMINGS

DUMPED ON SIDEWALK

Observed bags of tree

trimmings on sidewalk

(PROW).




Operations.

C16-02443

Case Closed

07/12/2016

INSPECTION AREA: 4 Total Cases: 8 Total Violations: 8

08/19/2015 APN#316-110-024 - ILLEGAL

DUMPING VACANT LOT

Observed several items

dumped in the vacant lot.

Two Notices to Abate, one Notice to Contact,

and three Administrative Citations issued to


owner.

C15-02830

Case Closed

01/12/2016

09/24/2015

FIELD/ACCESS ROAD NEAR

MARCH MIDDLE SCHOOL -

ILLEGAL DUMPING:

CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS

& CEMENT

Observed numerous items

dumped in the field.




Operations.

C15-03234

Case Closed

11/10/2015

02/02/2016

GENITIAL AVE BTWN

HEACOCK & PERRIS - VACA -

ILLEGAL DUMPING ON

VACANT LOT

Duplicate case opened. Duplicate case opened.

C16-00385

Case Closed

02/02/2016

02/18/2016

APN# 312-020-025 - ILLEGAL

DUMPING;

JUNK/TRASH/DEBRIS; WEEDS

Observed weeds and scattered

paper in the vacant lot.

No action needed. Parcel was disked and

items removed by property owner.

C16-00546

Case Closed

05/04/2016

12/30/2015

APN# 312-103-001 - LACK OF

FRONT LANDSCAPING,

ILLEGAL DUMPING:

CONCRETE



C15-04233

Case Closed

07/24/2016

06/05/2016

APN# 485-081-038 -


BINS





C16-02193

Case Closed

08/26/2016

03/03/2016 APN# 484-172-006 - ILLEGAL


C16-00711

Case Closed

03/21/2016

Moreno Valley



07/13/2015

APN# 482-313-012 -

DISCARDED HOUSEHOLD

ITEMS, ILLEGAL DUMPING



C15-02390

Case Closed

07/28/2015

INSPECTION AREA: 5

08/25/2015

SHELIA ST ALLEYWAY NEAR

GENTIAN X PERRIS -

ILLEGAL DUMPING IN

ALLEYWAY: DISCARDED

HOUSEHOLD ITEMS


C15-02903

Case Closed

08/30/2015

01/14/2016

JENKINS DRIVE, EASE OF

INDIAN AVE (PROW) -

ILLEGAL DUMPING (TWO

DUMPED LOVESEATES)

Observed loveseat dumped in

the right-of-way. Items removed by Waste Management.

C16-00160

Case Closed

01/15/2016

03/30/2016

ALLEYWAY FOR ELM &

PEPPER - ILLEGAL DUMPING

IN ALLEYWAY OF ELM &

PEPPER

Case re-assigned to Area 5

Code Officer. Case re-assigned to Area 5 Code Officer.

C16-01048

Active

05/11/2016

APN# 482-540-029 -


BINS





C16-01760

Case Closed

05/27/2016

10/28/2015

APN# 482-265-016 - IMPROPER

DISPOSAL OF OIL INTO CITY

STREET


C15-03662

Case Closed

11/12/2015

12/09/2015

APN# 485-053-009 -

DISCARDED HOUSEHOLD

ITEMS IN PUBLIC VIEW

Observed the trash, debris

and outside storage in the

front yard, including plastic

bottles, wood and observed

trashcans tires, wood, plastic

bags of recyclable bottles, a

television, toilet and other

items in the backyard.

Two Notices of Violations, three

Administrative Citations issued to the

property owner and four Liens recorded.


C15-04045

Case Closed

03/22/2016

INSPECTION AREA: 6

02/17/2016 APN#479-140-022 - ILLEGAL

DUMPING

Observed junk, trash and

debris.


property owner.

C16-00531

Case Closed

05/31/2016

04/14/2016

APN# 481-140-024 - LOCATED

ON WEBSTER AVE: ILLEGAL

DUMPING (HOUSEHOLD

ITEMS & TRASH/DEBRIS),

DILAPIDATED FENCING

Observed

weeds/tumbleweeds all

around the fence line and in

front of this lot and also

dilapidated chain link fencing

Two Notices of Violations issued to the


owner.

C16-01216

Case Closed

06/03/2016

04/21/2016

APN# 292-160-023 - UNSAFE

AND DILAPDATED SIGN,

JUNK, TRASH AND DEBRIS

Observed a large dilapidated

sign along with overgrown

weeds, junk, trash and debris.

Two Notices of Violations issued to the


owner.

C16-01317

Case Closed

08/12/2016

Moreno Valley



02/29/2016 APN# 481-250-026 DISCARDED

TABLE

Observed discarded

furniture, junk, trash and

debris.

Notice of Violation and Administrative

Citation issued to the property owner. Case is

still active.

C16-00645

Active

06/22/2016

APN# 292-170-010


BINS





C16-02468

Case Closed 08/26/2016

06/30/2016

APN# 292-250-010 -


BINS



Notices of Violation issued to property owner.


C16-02602

Case Closed

08/26/2016

06/30/2016

APN# 292-250-037 -


BINS





C16-02601

Case Closed

08/12/2016

06/30/2016

APN# 292-242-008 -


BINS





C16-02599

Case Closed

08/26/2016

06/30/2016

APN# 481-070-041 -


BINS





C16-02603

Case Closed

08/12/2016

04/19/2016 APN# 481-171-006 - ILLEGAL

DUMPING; 2 MATRESSES No violations observed. No action needed.

C16-01270

Case Closed

05/04/2016

Norco

Incident

Date


11-10-2015 Dirty Runoff Residential Written Fixed

1-6-2016 Dirty Runoff Residential Written Fixed

Perris

Incident Date


06/03/16 CE16-678

Prohibited discharge (oil). Improper storage & use of solvents and chemicals

-- Notice of Violation Pending

01/05/16 CE15-853

Prohibited discharge (oil).

Oil storage

-- Notice of Violation Complied

11/13/15 CE 15-843

Prohibited discharge (General hydroponics florabloom advanced nutrient system )


09/22/15 CE 15-713

Oil Storage -- Verbal Warning Complied

09/05/15 CE 15-677

Weed abatement -- Notice of Violation Complied

07/06/15 CE15-487

Prohibited discharge (sewage) -- Notice of Violation Complied

11/10/15 CE15-839

Unmaintained flood control channel and box culvert


Moreno Valley



Riverside

Date Violation/Pollutant Enforcement Action Disposition

7/1/2015 Water Waste No Violation Observed Case closed







7/9/2015 NPDES Violation Notice Issued Violation corrected/Case closed

7/10/2015 Water Waste Notice Issued Violation corrected/Case closed









7/23/2015 Green Pools Notice Issued Violation corrected/Case closed

7/23/2015 Public Nuisance No Violation Observed Case closed

7/24/2015 Water Waste Verbal warning given Violation corrected/Case closed





























8/14/2015 Water Waste Citation Issued Violation corrected/Case closed















9/11/2015 Public Nuisance Citation Issued Violation corrected/Case closed
















10/16/2015 Public Nuisance Notice Issued Violation corrected/Case closed




10/26/2015 Building/Housing Notice Issued Violation corrected/Case closed







Riverside


























1/21/2016 Green Pools Notice Issued Violation corrected/Case closed



2/1/2016 Public Nuisance Verbal warning given Violation corrected/Case closed


2/3/2016 Zoning Notice Issued Violation corrected/Case closed


2/8/2016 Illegal Business Notice Issued Violation corrected/Case closed









2/25/2016 Sewage No Violation Observed Case closed






Riverside






3/18/2016 Sewage Notice Issued Violation corrected/Case closed
























5/23/2016 Public Nuisance Citation Issued Violation corrected/Case closed


5/26/2016 Vacant/Neglected Properties Notice Issued Violation corrected/Case closed


6/1/2016 Water Waste Citation Issued Case still under investigation






Riverside County Please see attached document titled: Santa Ana Watershed Cases Opened All FY 15/16.

RCFC&WCD None – see attached complaint database.

San Jacinto None noted

Riverside






PERMITTEE

Provision No. VIII.G of the MS4 Permit requires each Permittee to submit a certification statement, signed by its legal counsel,

that the Permittee has obtained all necessary legal authority in accordance with 40 CFR Part 122.26(d)(2)(i)(A-F) and to comply

with the MS4 Permit through adoption of ordinances and/or municipal code modifications by January 29, 2012.

1. Attach a copy of the certification. 2. Have your Permittee's stormwater

ordinances, or other legal authorities for

implementing the NPDES Permit

changed during the reporting period? If

so, please provide a summary of the

changes.

YES NO

Beaumont Previously provided – no changes were made for this report period. Therefore no

recertification is necessary. No

Calimesa Reference attached copy; See exhibit "A" No

Canyon Lake Attachment #1 No Corona SEE ATTACHMENT 'G' No Eastvale See Attachment A No

Hemet SEE ATTACHMENT A No

Jurupa Valley Certification is attached. No

Lake Elsinore Exhibit D Yes, see individual

Permittee Report

Menifee A copy of the certification is Attachment A.

Moreno Valley See Attachment A No

Norco - No Perris See Exhibit 4 No

Riverside See attached documents Riverside County Attached No

RCFC&WCD See Attached Documents No San Jacinto PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED WITH THE FY14-15 Annual Report. No






PERMITTEE

Provision No. VIII.F requires the Permittees to annually provide a report containing a review of their Stormwater Ordinances and

their ordinance enforcement programs in prohibiting the following types of discharges to the MS4.

Does your Permittee's Stormwater Ordinance prohibit:

1. Sewage, where a Co-Permittee operates a sewage collection system?

2. Wash water resulting from hosing or cleaning of gas stations, auto repair garages and other types of automobile service stations?

3. Discharges resulting from the cleaning, repair, or maintenance of equipment, machinery or facility, including motor vehicles, concrete mixing equipment, portable toilet servicing, etc.?

4. Wash water from mobile auto detailing and washing, steam and pressure cleaning, carpet/upholstery cleaning, pool cleaning, and other mobile commercial/industrial activities?

5. Water from cleaning of municipal, industrial, and commercial sites including parking lots, streets, sidewalks, driveways, patios, plazas, work yards and outdoor eating or drinking areas, etc.?

Beaumont Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Calimesa No Yes Yes Yes Yes

Canyon Lake Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Corona Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Eastvale Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Hemet Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Jurupa Valley No Yes Yes Yes Yes

Lake Elsinore No Yes Yes Yes Yes

Menifee Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Moreno Valley No Yes Yes Yes Yes

Norco Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Perris Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Riverside Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Riverside County No Yes Yes Yes Yes

RCFC&WCD No No No No No

San Jacinto Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes






PERMITTEE

Provision No. VIII.F requires the Permittees to annually provide a report containing a review of their Stormwater Ordinances and their

ordinance enforcement programs in prohibiting the following types of discharges to the MS4.

Does your Permittee's Stormwater Ordinance prohibit:

6. Runoff from material storage areas or uncovered receptacles that contain chemicals, fuels, grease, oil, or other hazardous materials?

7. Discharges of runoff from the washing of hazardous materials from paved or unpaved areas.

8. Discharges of pool or fountain water containing chlorine, biocides, or other chemicals; pool filter backwash containing debris and chlorine?

9. Pet waste, yard waste, debris, sediment, etc.?

10. Restaurant or food processing facility wastes such as grease, floor mat and trash bin wash water, food waste?

Beaumont Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Calimesa Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Canyon Lake Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Corona Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Eastvale Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Hemet Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Jurupa Valley Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Lake Elsinore Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Menifee Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Moreno Valley Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Norco Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Perris Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Riverside Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Riverside County Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

RCFC&WCD No No No No No

San Jacinto Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes






PERMITTEE

Provision No. VIII.F requires the Permittees to annually provide a report containing a review of their Stormwater Ordinances and their

ordinance enforcement programs in prohibiting the following types of discharges to the MS4.

11. If any of the above points have not been met, please describe what actions are being taken to satisfy these requirements.

Beaumont N/A

Calimesa

The City of Calimesa does not own or operate a sewage collection system; Yucaipa Valley Water District is the owner of the system and is

responsible for all operation and maintenance of their sewage collection systems; however, the City does monitor all permitted connections and

operations.

Canyon Lake N/A

Corona N/A

Eastvale N/A

Hemet N/A

Jurupa Valley Item 1 does not apply to the City because we do not operate a sewage collection system.

Lake Elsinore Exhibit O

Menifee ---

Moreno Valley Item No. 1—Not applicable to Moreno Valley, since we do not own/operate a POTW.

Norco N/A

Perris

On December 23, 2011 the City Attorney's Office issued a certification letter (See attached Exhibit 4) indicating that the City of Perris' current

Ordinance #1194 (P.M.C. 14.22 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND DISCHARGE CONTROLS) provides City staff with legal authority to

enforce the provisions of NPDES Permit/Board Order R8-2010-0033. The current ordinance contains language that assisted developers with the

transition date from the San Jacinto permit to the original version of the WQMP that provided for final sunset dates for approved final WQMP's.

Over the course of the next few months City Staff will be requesting that City Council consider more specific and detailed provisions intended to

remove this out-of-date language. This will provide code enforcement officers with an updated version of all Board order numbers for any future

code action. Any approved revisions will be forwarded to the Regional Water Board during the 2016-17 Annual Report.

Riverside N/A

Riverside County The County does not own or operate a sewage treatment facility.

RCFC&WCD

To ensure compliance with the requirements of the 2010 SAR MS4 Permit, the District relies on the concept of Combined Legal Authority with

the other Permittees of the 2010 SAR MS4 Permit. Combined Legal Authority, which has been established through an Implementation Agreement

with other MS4 Permittees, is described in the LIP.

San Jacinto --






PERMITTEE

Provision No. VIII.F requires the Permittees to annually provide a report containing a review of their Stormwater

Ordinances and their ordinance enforcement programs in prohibiting the following types of discharges to the MS4.

12. Please summarize the effectiveness evaluation of your ordinance, ordinance enforcement practices with regard to prohibiting non-

exempt, non-stormwater discharges to the MS4.

Beaumont

Overall, the City's enforcement practices uphold the City's storm water ordinance. However, ordinance enforcement was by-and-large under the

City Code Enforcement during the 2015-2016 fiscal years, the enforcement staff was reduced by 67%. Public Works staff and consultants have

provided additional enforcement, but a process for recording compliance related enforcement actions was not formalized due to departmental

turnover and the previously mentioned staffing disruptions. Moving forward, a database will formally track the non-exempt, non-stormwater

discharges and to further evaluate the effectiveness of the City's MS-4 program. The database will also be used to centralize and track

documentation of stormwater compliance enforcement actions.

Calimesa

At this time, all ordinances are current and working. We will continue to evaluate our ordinance(s) and make any necessary revisions to ensure

proper enforcement and ultimately create more enforcement authority and overall compliance, as needed or required. Ultimately, our goal is to

provide public outreach and education to achieve the ultimate compliance.

Canyon Lake

After review of the City's Ordinance, the City has found the Ordinance to be effective and is not experiencing any difficulty with enforcement.

The City works with Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) and the Property Owners Association (POA) to educate and publicize

the procedure for residents who wish to drain pools and spas. Since all drains lead to the lake, the City does not allow any discharge into the

street, even if the water is neutralized and meets p fH levels set by the lake owner, EVMWD. In Cooperation with EVMWD, pamphlets are

available at City Hall and have been distributed to the public about improper disposal of pool and spa water into storm drains (Attachment #2).

The City currently implements this as one of our BMP measures. In addition to the public, Chapter 5 of the City's Municipal Code requires that

all businesses hold a business license issued by the City (Attachment #3). This application requires businesses involving NPDES compliance

identify such on the Business License Application before any licenses are approved (Attachment #4). Every business is also required to

acknowledge specific guidelines of the Municipal Code identifying mobile detailers (Attachment #5) and additional informational pamphlets

outlining storm drain pollution prevention are mailed with each license (Attachment #6).

Corona

a) For the 2013-14 reporting year, Public Works Department updated the Storm Water Quality Ordinance in order to ensure it reflected the

latest Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) provisions and definitions per the Permit. The updated Ordinance (No. 3164) was approved

at the March 19, 2014 City Council meeting.

b) The MS4 Permit requires developing an inventory and mapping of our Outfalls in preparation for implementation of the revised Illicit

Connection/Illicit Discharge (IC/ID) program incorporated into the County's Consolidated Monitoring Program (CMP). Additionally, the

IC/ID monitoring components require Permittees to develop a schedule to conduct and implement systematic investigations of Outfalls using

field indicators to identify, track and implement corrective measures for all illegal discharges. These activities have been completed within

this permit term and documented in last year's report.

c) The City of Corona was a co-participant in the County Health Department administered "Compliance Assistance Program" and performed

follow-up inspections on facilities with potential illicit discharges and ordinance violations. The CAP is no longer active effective December

31, 2014; however, the City continues with its inspection program adhering to the Permit requirements.



d) The City of Corona has staff members devoted to providing prompt follow-up to telephone calls and complaints concerning illicit discharges

and/or improper disposal of pollutants into storm drain facilities.

e) The City uses a SeeClickFix application (www.seeclickfix.com/corona) which enables community members (residents and businesses) to

report illegal dumping from an iphone, Android, Blackberry, or a desktop browser. By taking a picture, describing the situation, and allowing

the application to automatically log the phone's GPS position, the request is sent to the correct City department to get each issue resolved fast

and efficiently.

f) Maintenance Services, Department of Water and Power, Code Enforcement, Fire and Public Works departments work together to respond to

violation events. The NPDES Section follows up on all events to ensure proper notification and reporting requirements are followed as

specified in the DAMP. Enforcement depends on the severity of the violation and may require immediate containment and clean up, verbal

warnings, notices of violation, recovery of costs, and public education to the violator including handing out public education materials.

g) City field staff is trained on the City's storm water ordinance and what constitutes a non-storm water discharge or illicit connection and how

to report to their supervisors so that they can be investigated.

h) Staff may issue a Notice of Violation specifically for NPDES Ordinance violations. The NOV form is tailored to identify the specific

municipal code violation and written corrective action(s) required. It is a tri-ply form in which the violator acknowledges receipt of the

correction. Seven NOVs were issued this reporting year; the sites were brought into compliance.

Eastvale

The City's stormwater ordinance provides the City with the right-to-inspect any premises, grounds, facilities, or structures for which compliance

is required by the ordinance (City Municipal Code, Section 14.12.100 - Attachment B). The City's stormwater ordinance also provides the City

with the authority to revoke and/or suspend a permit which has both been issued and conditioned for compliance with the stormwater ordinance

or conditioned with the implementation of specific BMPs (City Municipal Code, Section 14.12.110 - Attachment B).

Hemet Continued efforts to reduce water waste per the requirements of a 2015 SWRCB Conservation Order minimized non-stormwater discharges during

FY 2015-2016.

Jurupa Valley

The Ordinance has been highly effective in achieving compliance. We have successfully used it to prevent chlorinated pool discharges and

discharge paint cleaning water. It has helped with the compliance with the WQMP requirements for development. Developers are advised that

the Water Quality project guidelines are good for them as all development have to assist in treating runoff and the City has the authority to require

compliance.

http://www.seeclickfix.com/corona



Lake Elsinore

1) The City's Ordinance 14.08 "Stormwater/Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Controls" has been certified by the City Attorney as providing

sufficient legal authority to achieve compliance in the event of an IC/ID.

2) City Ordinances are enforced both proactively and reactively. Proactive enforcement is evidenced through the project review process for new

development, significant redevelopment, condition use, temporary use, special event, and business licensing. A multi-departmental process provides

for conditioning to prevent code violations from the beginning.

3) In coordination with our business license permit process, City staff speaks with new businesses seeking a new license, change to an existing license

or renewal to educate them on good housekeeping principles and provides an over view of stormwater pollution prevention.

4) The City also reviews and approves all plans for connections to City MS4 facilities. Public Works maintenance staff receive annual training on

NPDES and maintenance crews report IC/IDs detected during maintenance or other routine activities

5) Reactive enforcement comes into play when notice of a discharge is received by staff. Staff takes the opportunity to educate the discharger and the

surrounding neighborhood. The City's enforcement procedures are outlined in the City's Local Implementation Plan at Section 3.4 and the Lake

Elsinore Municipal Code at Chapter 1.16. Enforcement as a tool is useful in stopping or gaining compliance with regard to discharges and preventing

repeat occurrences.

6) Community Development, Public Works and Engineering Department Staff take an active role in responding and reporting IC/IDs.

7) The City contracts with a firm for inspection of applicable Commercial and Industrial Businesses in the City.

8) Participation in the Technical Advisory Committee Public Education Committee, dissemination of stormwater educational materials through City-

wide publications and at annual Pet Walk event and through the business license program. No changes in procedures are recommended at this time.

Menifee All of the above are addressed in the storm water ordinance.

Moreno

Valley

The Ordinance has overall been effective on prohibiting non-exempt, non-stormwater discharges to the MS4. As indicated above, the City's

enforcement practices ensure compliance.

Norco The City Ordinance appears to be effective based on available performance indicators.

Perris The City's new NPDES Ordinance #1194 was adopted in 2006 and has been highly successful in addressing required permit elements. Several City

departments have been committed to implementing Ordinance #1194 over the past ten years.

Riverside

The Riverside Municipal Code has enabled City departments to ensure that illegal discharges to the MS4 are prohibited. Various meetings and other

communication throughout the year serve to provide assurances that the municipal code is effective and provides City staffs with a mechanism whereby

they can enforce water quality provisions. The City of Riverside continually seeks ways to strengthen its ability to preserve water quality.

Riverside

County

The County's Stormwater Ordinance 754, in conjunction with other ordinances that relate to environmental protection, is supported by Ordinance 725

which establishes penalties and procedures for violation of Riverside County ordinances.

RCFC&WCD N/A However, the District has successfully coordinated IC/ID response and elimination among the Permittees.

San Jacinto

The City of San Jacinto routinely reviews the applicable ordinances as it relates to effectiveness. As a result of these reviews, the City enacted ordinance

09-16 on May 21, 2009 that was based on the Metropolitan Water District's model ordinance which prohibits excessive overspray and run-off of

irrigation water. The combination of this ordinance with the City's existing storm water requirements set forth in Chapter 13.44 of the City's municipal

code provides effective tools for the City to enforce its NPDES programs.

In addition, the City adopted additional water conservation programs in response to the Governor's Executive Orders. From May 2015 to May 2016,

the City routinely reduced water consumption by approximately 30% when compared to 2013 water usage.






PERMITTEE

Provision No. VIII.H of the MS4 Permit requires the Permittees to annually provide a report containing an evaluation of their

implementation and enforcement response procedures in controlling IC/IDs.

Please provide a summary of the findings of your evaluation and recommended corrective actions and schedules for implementation.

Beaumont

Enforcement actions were taken and/or recommended as described in the table above. Education is provided first to ensure that the public is

aware of the prohibition of illegal discharges and illicit connections to the MS4. Any public education provided is recorded in the database as

a verbal warning. Once a verbal warning is issued, any repeat violation at a given address will be logged into the database and a citation will

be issued. Progressive enforcement actions as required by the State MS 4-Permit and/or city LIP are taken as appropriate.

Calimesa

The City of Calimesa maintains adequate legal authority to control the discharge of Pollutants to the MS4. The City enforces applicable

municipal codes and ordinances accordingly and as required during an IC/ID event. The City annually reviews our Storm Water Ordinances

and enforcement programs prohibiting discharges to the MS4. The City is proactive with controlling IC/IDs and is prepared to take the

appropriate enforcement action as required, to gain proper compliance. Our goal is to provide public education with the intent of controlling

the contribution of Pollutants to the MS4, stop Pollutant discharge or threat of discharge and to require the use of BMP's to prevent or reduce

the discharge of Pollutants into MS4. We promote public educational outreach through speaking with community members, business owners

and property owners as well as providing informational handouts.

Canyon Lake

The City of Canyon Lake has proactively coordinated with the Canyon Lake Property Owners Association's Community Patrol, Marine Patrol,

and City Special Enforcement Officers. EVMWD also monitors discharge sites and performs periodic water quality tests. City staff takes every

available opportunity to educate the public on proper construction practices, pool and spa drainage procedures and other MS4 related issues.

Alum treatments were conducted in September 2013, February 2014, September 2014, May 2015, September 2015, May 2016 and September

2016.

Corona

As mentioned above, the City utilizes various enforcement tools to bring sites into compliance with our NPDES Ordinance. Most compliance

is achieved through verbal warnings issued at the time the violation is observed. Where a correction is required and the verbal warning has not

been effective, the City will issue an NOV. Seven Notices of Violations were issued this reporting year, which consequently brought the sites

into compliance.

Eastvale Proper staff has been trained in spotting and tracking IC/ID incidents. No corrective actions were needed after evaluating the program. Staff

will note and report and IC/ID situations to program manager for follow up and recording data.

Hemet The City of Hemet continues to document enforcement actions and provide educational materials to increase the awareness and understanding

of the City Stormwater Ordinance in an effort to change behavior and reduce the discharge of pollutants to the MS4.

Jurupa Valley

The City Maintenance Crews mitigate discharges from objects left in the public right-of-way by removal on a daily basis and also in response

to citizen calls. Removal of these items reduce pollutants into the MS4. The City has also hired additional Public Works staff which will increase

the programs effectiveness in removal of pollutants.



Lake Elsinore

The City follows the enforcement procedures and guidelines outlined in the City's Local Implementation Plan at Section 3.4 and the Lake

Elsinore Municipal Code at Chapter 1.16. Levels of enforcement in practical application begin with verbal / education of the discharger and

escalate up to imposition of citations/monetary penalties and criminal prosecution. All reports are responded to within 24 hours of receipt

which reinforces the sense of urgency the City gives to the potential pollution to our Lake and/or streams. The City responded to, investigated

and resolved 33 reports of illegal discharges. With all Fiscal Year 15/16 incidents resolved, it can be stated that the City's enforcement program

is very effective. The City focuses on voluntary compliance working with the discharger to resolution. The majority of the incidents are not

active discharges and require education on cleanup and preventative measures. The City works with the non-active discharger towards

compliance, escalating enforcement as needed. In cases of active discharge, compliance is immediate. The City employs a cooperative attitude

when resolving active discharges, working closely with the discharger, calling upon the Principal Permittee Hazmat team and Elsinore Valley

Municipal Water District as needed. The recommendations for improvement identified in the FY 14/15 Annual report have been met. Based on

the evaluation of the program, no changes are recommended at this time

Menifee

The City's storm water ordinance 15.01 defines illicit connections and illicit discharges (IC/IDs) to the storm drain system. Public Works and

Code Enforcement staff are trained on the storm water ordinance and on IC/ID response and reporting as outlined in the City's Local

Implementation Plan (LIP). The City implements various inspection programs (construction, industrial and commercial, municipal, structural

BMP) to control IC/IDs, monitors major outfalls, responds to public complaints, and works with contracted maintenance staff to ensure that

MS4 facilities are free of non-storm water discharges. Public Works staff responds to third-party complaints of IC/IDs to the storm drain

system. All violations are investigated and responsible parties are notified of the City's storm water requirements. All violations are tracked

in a database which documents violation type, enforcement, and resolution status. Enforcement depends on the nature of the violation and may

include the distribution of educational materials, verbal warnings, written warnings, Notices of Violation, or cost recovery for containment and

clean-up. The City's implementation and enforcement of the IC/ID program has been effective in 2015-16 and no corrective actions were

recommended since the last reporting period. As discussed above, IC/IDs to the City's MS4 are detected and investigated through various

programs, including industrial and commercial business inspections, fixed municipal facility inspections, post-construction structural BMP

inspections, construction site inspections, MS4 facility inspections, third-party complaints, and outfall monitoring. This year the City completed

113 full and partial industrial and commercial business inspections, and eight IC/IDs were either observed or reported during the inspection

program. The City is still working with three commercial businesses where an IC/ID was observed to implement appropriate BMPs to prevent

future discharges. No IC/IDs were observed during the City's annual municipal inspections at nine facilities. Additionally, no IC/IDs were

detected during the 22 full and partial structural BMP inspections (which included both City-owned BMPs and privately owned BMPs)

performed in 2015-16. No IC/IDs were reported to the City during catch basin cleaning in 2015-16. A total of nine complaints reporting an

illegal discharge to the storm drain system were received by the City in 2015-16. Attachment B is an IC/ID tracking spreadsheet for third-party

complaints and those IC/IDs associated with an inspection program with case details.

Moreno Valley

Pursuant to the most recent inspections of the City, no illegal connections were reported. The City receives daily reports for Underground

Service Alert (USA) and staff reviews the reports to determine if any proposed excavations will affect city storm drains or channels. Staff then

compares the reports to approved encroachment permits. If a permit was not authorized, a Stop Work Order is issued.

Norco Staff has reviewed Municipal Codes section 15.70.070 which covers IC/IDs and determined the section to be adequate.



Perris

The City of Perris maintains a record of all enforcement actions taken against those suspected of violating the City's Stormwater Management

and Discharge Controls Ordinance, and continues to issue a variety of correction notices up to and including court citation for misdemeanor

violations. The enforcement procedures have been deemed adequate. The City will continue to review the IDDE (Illicit Discharge Detection

and Elimination) Guidance Manual for Program Development and Technical Assessments to consider additional methods intended to improve

upon its enforcement response procedures. The City will make this an annual practice of review, and any changes the City deems useful will be

incorporated into the City's LIP. Areas of review will include: interdepartmental communication/coordination, timely compliance, third party

inspection programs.

Riverside

Existing enforcement response procedures appear to be effective. City staffs from the involved departments regularly discuss issues encountered

in the field and appropriate enforcement responses. If new ideas or methods to improve City processes are identified, through such dialog then

City acts accordingly to implement the necessary changes and improve the stormwater program.

Riverside County

County Executive Office coordinates those IC/ID complaints received to various and appropriate county departments. Typically, complaints are

received from several different sources throughout the county; citizens, county staff, District staff, city staff, Regional Board staff, and

anonymous tips. Should hazardous materials be involved, the County will notify the Department of Environmental Health (DEH) for response.

Additionally, the DEH has staff on-call 24/7 to respond to complaints and field investigations distributed by Cal EMA. If a complaint is non-

hazardous, County Code Enforcement, potentially in conjunction with the Transportation Department Environmental Compliance staff will

respond. This process is functioning effectively as the County has not experienced deficiencies in implementing enforcement response procedures

in controlling IC/IDs. In FY15/16, Code Enforcement staff was provided with annual training that was more job-specific that led to greater

discussions and understanding of NPDES compliance. The Code Enforcement Department also conducted an "El Nino" outreach campaign that

successfully mitigated contaminated run off, erosion and flooding.

RCFC&WCD

Prior to the issuance of an encroachment permit, planned connections are reviewed by District staff; staff provide prompt responses to inquiries

and complaints from the public; maintenance crews report IC/IDs detected in facilities; as an additional measure, a patrol person inspects each

accessible flood control facility annually, and where IC/IDs are detected, efforts to identify and address the source are initiated in cooperation

with the Watershed Protection Division. All pipes are also inspected prior to acceptance for District maintenance to ensure that there are no illicit

connections. Further, unpermitted connections are investigated and the responsible party is notified in writing to either obtain a permit or remove

the connection. Lastly, complaint calls are coordinated by the Water Quality Compliance Section of the Watershed Protection Division. A

written log is maintained and each call is evaluated. Incidents located within Permittee (City or County) jurisdiction and within their respective

MS4 right-of-way are referred to the appropriate agency. Incidents within District right-of-way are verified then appropriate response and

notification actions are implemented, often in coordination with the local land use authority.

San Jacinto The City of San Jacinto has evaluated its enforcement and response procedures in controlling IC/IDs and has determined that they meet

the requirements of the permit. No corrective actions are required at this time.





PERMITTEE

Provision No. XII.E.5 of the MS4 Permit requires the Permittees to adopt the State Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, or

to prepare one that is "at least as effective" as the State Model by January 2010. Appendix 3, the Monitoring and Reporting Program

required an Annual Effectiveness Evaluation with respect to water efficiency and water conservation goals

1. Please provide Permittees Annual Effectiveness Evaluation with respect to water efficiency and water conservation goals.

Beaumont

The City has adopted the State Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Water conservation is tracked and implemented by the Beaumont-

Cherry Valley Water District. Since water supply to city residents is provided by the Beaumont Cherry Valley Water District (BCVWD), they

through water billing program inform the residents and other irrigation customers to use water conservation practices including reuse of water

where possible. There are recommended days for outside water practices to assure that precious potable water resources are utilized as

beneficially as possible. There are outreach brochures which will be distributed to home owners to further strengthen water conservation

practices. Copies of outreach brochures are enclosed as a part of this report.

Calimesa

The City of Calimesa signed an agreement "MOU" on April 24, 2014 with all local agencies under State Water Resources Control Board

Resolution No. 2014-0038. Please reference exhibit "Y", establishing drought regulations targeting outdoor urban water use, mandating water

conservation and prohibiting the wasteful outdoor use of drinking water. The City of Calimesa will adhere, monitor, and enforce the

prohibitions as referenced in exhibit "Y" of this report. Also, please reference exhibit "C", Calimesa Municipal Code Chapter 18.75 Water

Conservation for landscaping, which is in compliance with Government Code Section 65591.2 and 65595.

Canyon Lake

The City of Canyon Lake adopted the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance in November of 2009 (Attachment #7). The City of Canyon Lake

has evaluated the effectiveness of its Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance with respect to water efficiency and conservation goals, and found

it to be effective.

Corona SEE ATTACHMENT 'H'

Eastvale

The City of Eastvale has adopted the County of Riverside's Ordinance 859, with its ensuing amendments. In light of the Governor's order on

drought regulations the City is working close with the County and JCSD for amendments or changes to the current Ordinance. JCSD is

responsible to prepare an Annual Effectiveness Evaluation as it is the lead agency on this issue. See Ordinance 859 (Attachment C) and JCSD

Annual Report for more details.

Hemet

Since its adoption in April 2010, City of Hemet Landscaping and Irrigation Ordinance (Municipal Code Chapter 90, Article XLVIII) has

required that applicants for all new development projects provide a compliance letter to the planning department, public works department and

department of building and safety verifying that landscaping and the irrigation system have been installed in compliance with the approved

landscape documentation package. In October 2014, City of Hemet developed and implemented an improved notification system for addressing

water waste based on our Water Conservation Plan. In January 2015, the Hemet City Council amended this Water Conservation Plan to meet

SWRCB Emergency Regulations. The SWRCB issued a Conservation Order to the City of Hemet in August 2015 which required the City to

implement a water rate structure to encourage conservation (which was done) and to reach out to commercial, industrial and institutional

customers to implement additional conservation measures. During FY 2015-16, 44 Water Waste Notices were issued. The vast majority of

these notices (38) were issued to commercial businesses and multi-unit apartment complexes. Nearly all water waste was related to irrigation

runoff. Business owners and managers have been cooperative in adjusting irrigation to avoid runoff and/or converting turf to xeriscaping.



Jurupa Valley

Contractors are learning to use water efficient landscape and streetscape in their development such as those demonstrated by the State of

California, Department of Water Resources, United States EPA, the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District in their

demonstration project and Eastern Municipal Water District in their water efficient landscape irrigation systems.

Lake Elsinore

The City adopted as Ordinance 1269, LEMC Chapter 19.08 "Water Efficient Landscape Requirements" on January 12, 2010. The City

amended and restated Chapter 19.08 of its municipal Code on March 8, 2016, to be at least as effective as the July, 2015 updated Department

of Water Resources State Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance.(Exhibit J)

Menifee The City of Menifee has adopted the County of Riverside's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance.

Moreno Valley

The City has been successful in implementing the water efficiency and water conservation goals as provided for in the Municipal Code. With

the policy direction that has been provided due to the drought restrictions by Eastern Municipal Water District, any new landscapes will

continue to be consistent with or exceed the City's water efficiency goals. Since water budgets are required to be approved by developers,

there has not really been push back from developers. The biggest challenge right now is to create aesthetically pleasing landscapes consistent

with EMWD policy (eg. no sod for new single-family tract homes).

Norco City of Norco ordinance "Water Efficient Landscaping" is included in the Municipal Code Chapter 18.55.

Perris

Ordinance #1265, amended Section 19.70 Landscaping, of the Zoning Code to incorporate mandatory water conservation measures required

by the State of California (AB 1881). The ordinance was adopted, signed and approved by the City Council of the City of Perris, as evidenced

the City Clerk's attestation, on January 12, 2010. Please find attached the signed Ordinance in lieu of the report to the Department of Water

Resources (see attached Exhibit 6)

Riverside

The City proactively promotes water efficiency and water conservation goals. In 2010, the City adopted a locally developed Water Efficient

Landscape Ordinance. In addition, the City has adopted a water conservation ordinance that limits unreasonable uses of water and establishes

a codified water conservation program. More information on the City's efforts to promote water efficiency and water conservation goals can

be found at: http://www.greenriverside.com/about-green-riverside/blue-riverside

Riverside County This has been reported in previous annual reports. The County is in compliance with AB1881 and the County's Water Efficient Landscape

Requirements Ordinance (No. 859.3) is in effect.

RCFC&WCD The District is a Special District by act of the State Legislature and has no land use authority.

San Jacinto

The City of San Jacinto adopted a water conservation ordinance number 09-16 on May 21, 2009. The City continues to implement water

conservation measures as required by the Governor's Executive orders calling for a 25% reduction in water use and the Department of Water

Resources mandated 32% reduction in municipal services. Water consumption within the City's service area has continued to decline in

response to both the Executive Order and the City's on-going water conservation efforts. Under the mandatory water reduction requirements,

the City reduced potable water consumption by an average of 30% between July 2015 and June 2016 when compared to 2013 consumption.

http://www.greenriverside.com/about-green-riverside/blue-riverside


PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION Section 4 – Program Implementation and Evaluation Page 4-1

4. PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION

Provision No. IV.C of the 2010 MS4 Permit, requires the Permittees to evaluate their implemented

urban runoff management programs to determine the need, if any, for revision to its LIP, and

Provision Nos. VI.D.1.a.v-vii and VI.D.2.c require update of LIPs caused by changes to the DAMP,

WQMP, Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake and Middle Santa Ana River TMDL studies.

A summary of the Permittees' evaluation of the current program implementation is presented in

Table 4-1 which follows.

Local Implementation Plan

In compliance with Requirement IV.A of the Order, a LIP Template was developed and submitted

to the Board on July 29, 2010. The District received comments from the SARWQCB on November

17, 2010, which were addressed and submitted back to the SARWQCB for review on July 29, 2011.

The LIP Template was approved by the SARWQCB on May 24, 2012. Per Permit Provision IV.B,

the Permittees were to complete their LIPs within 12 months of approval of the LIP Template. The

Permittees LIPs were completed by May 24, 2013. The Permittees also updated their LIPs before

January 29, 2014 to include the CNRP approval and the Amendment to the Implementation

Agreement. On December 31, 2014, Riverside County Department of Environmental Health

concluded the County Assistance Program inspection support. In FY 2015-2016 the LIP will be

updated to include the removal of the CAP program. On June 30, 2016 the LIP was updated to

include the new Public Education Program name and activities, provided a status update on the

LE/CL TMDL revision, and included the two structural BMPs selected by the Task Force to address

the Bacteria TMDL in the Santa Ana River.

Drainage Area Management Plan

The Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) was updated on June 30, 2016 to include a

description of the supporting documents for the WAP and provided a status update on the documents.

Updated DAMP is located in Appendix N.

Per Appendix 3, Provision B.2.j of the 2010 SAR MS4 Permit, the Permittees are required to include

a draft work plan that describes the proposed implementation of the LIPs and DAMP for FY 2015-

2016.

The following are the projected tasks and a tentative schedule of implementation to the DAMP and

LIP:

Watershed Action Plan will be updated following approval from the SARWQCB.

The HMP will be updated following approval from the SARWQCB.

Table 4-1- Program Implementation and Evaluation


PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION 2015-2016 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT


Provision No. IV.C of the Santa Ana Region NPDES Municipal Stormwater Permit, Board Order No. R8-2010-0033 (Permit) requires the Permittees to

evaluate the effectiveness of their Urban Runoff Management Programs to determine the need for revisions to its Local Implementation Plan (LIP).

PERMITTEE 1. Please provide a summary of the findings of your review and any needed revisions.

Beaumont

The City did not evaluate the effectiveness of their Urban Runoff Management Program (URMP) this fiscal year due to staff disruptions and

insufficient consultant oversight. No changes to the LIP were made during this fiscal year. The URMP and LIP will be updated in the 2016-

2017 fiscal year.

Calimesa

The Urban Runoff Management Program is operating effectively and therefore we do not have any revisions for this reporting period. We

will continue to monitor the plan and will revise as needed or required. Please reference Calimesa Municipal Code Chapter 16.10

Stormwater/Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Controls, which is attached as exhibit "AA". Included within exhibit "AA" is

Ordinance 95-17 Establishing Stormwater/Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Controls.

Canyon Lake

The City of Canyon Lake has one major public roadway, Railroad Canyon Road, with 27 storm drains that are cleaned 2 times a year by the

City of Canyon Lake contractor, Downstream Services. The storm drains were cleaned in September 2015 and April 2016. City Building

Inspectors, Code Enforcement and Special Enforcement Officers are trained annually and monitor any new construction, entirely single

family residential. In regard to the City of Canyon Lake future land use, the City of Canyon Lake is primarily built out, thus future land use

is limited and will not change dramatically. Within the private gated community there is a system of 153 private storm drains and inlets that

are mapped and inventoried. Inspections and cleanouts occur twice annually or more often as needed. The maintenance is performed by the

Property Owners Association's full time staff who attend training. City staff has reviewed the City's program compliance with provisions of

the NPDES Municipal Storm Water permit.

Corona

The City developed the LIP which was noted in the 2013-14 report, and was certified by the Public Works Director under direction from the

City Manager by May 24, 2013. The City recently implemented departmental and personnel changes. We are working to update the LIP

for these changes which will be documented in next year's report.

Eastvale Upon evaluating the Urban Runoff Management Programs it is determined there is no need for revisions to the Local Implementation Plan

(LIP). However, we will continue to monitor the Urban Runoff Management Programs and make changes to the LIP as needed.

Hemet Following the Program Effectiveness Assessment, it was determined there were several revisions were made to the City of Hemet Stormwater

Program Local Implementation Plan during FY 2015-2016. See details below.

Jurupa Valley The LIP has been reviewed and updated to show the end of the CAP program and how the City staff will include all restaurant inspections

into their program.



Lake Elsinore

City staff conducted a review of the following program components: Interagency Agreements, Fiscal Analysis, Legal Authority, MS4 Facility

Inspections, IC/ID Program, IC/ID Database, Road Projects, Facilities and Activities, Watershed Action Plan, Hydromodification

Management Plan. Based on that review the following is a summary of updates/revisions to the City's LIP:

Identification of Personnel, Positions, and areas of responsibility throughout the document

Ordinance/Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Changes

Updated language throughout for greater clarification and in compliance with schedules and activities completed on behalf of the

Co-Permittees Technical Advisory Committee.

Section 3.5 "Enforcement" – revised to coincide with policy and procedures in practice that support voluntary compliance over

penalized compliance.

Section 4.0 "Elimination of Illicit Connections and Illegal Discharges – revised to reflect discontinuation of the CAP program and

use of contract personnel for commercial and industrial inspections. Clarified the jurisdictional monitoring responsibilities of

Riverside County Flood Control District within the City of Lake Elsinore city limits. Clarified procedures for SSO enforcement and

identified the use of the SSO binder and SOP for IC/ID non-jurisdictional discharges.

Section 5.0- "City of Lake Elsinore Facilities and Activities" – updated to reflect role of Engineering Department; Updated

"responsible parties" for SMARTS;

Section 6.0 "Development Planning" – added flow chart to provide for greater understanding of City process with regard to new

projects; Updated "master" conditions of approval to include increasing levels of compliance requirements; Updated language to

provide clarity as to field verification process for post construction BMPs. See Exhibit T for evaluation of Post Construction BMP

effectiveness.

Section 7.0 "Private Development Construction Activity" – added reference to new Citywide database, EnerGov; added "Routine

Inspections" as a specific inspection category; Updated construction enforcement to reinforce the voluntary compliance stance of

the City.

Section 8.0 "Industrial and Commercial Sources" – Updated to include reference to new City Business License database; Updated

to include over-the-counter counseling with businesses processing an application; Updated to include use of contract inspectors for

commercial & industrial businesses; Updated to reflect process in place for inspection and recordkeeping and notification.

Section 9.0 & 10 "Residential Sources Program" and "Public Education and Outreach" - Updated program name to reflect change

to MS4 marketing program; updated to include cooperation with EVMWD on drought restrictions; added City hosted Pet Walk as a

local event.

Section 11 "Training" – no changes

Section 12 "TMDL Implementation" – Updated TMDL Implementation Strategy and City's participation in the process.

Section 13 "Program Reporting, Evaluation, and Revision" and Section 14 Monitoring – no changes/revisions of any significance.



Menifee

The San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board issued Tentative Order R9-2015-0100 (an order amending Order No. R9-2013-0001,

NPDES No. CAS010266, as amended by Order No. R9-2015-0001) on November 18, 2015 requiring the City of Menifee to participate in

the development and implementation of the Water Quality Improvement Plan (WQIP) for the Santa Margarita River Watershed Management

Area. The WQIP is expected to be completed in January 2018 and will be incorporated into the LIP for the City of Menifee. Beyond

acknowledging the significant regulatory action, the City also updated various program elements in the LIP. These included general

enforcement procedures that were edited to indicate that Public Works or consultant staff will investigate and attempt to resolve any

enforcement cases. Code Enforcement will only be involved where necessary. The City updated its municipal facility inventory to include

eight parks and a small temporary Public Works yard behind City Hall. The LIP also describes improvements in 2015-16 to the Structural

BMP Inspection Program and the Industrial and Commercial Inspection Program. These include a better description of the frequency of

structural BMP inspections and a more detailed enforcement procedure for business inspections. Lastly, the LIP incorporates the Riverside

County Watershed Protection Program as a resource for public education.

Moreno Valley Moreno Valley completed its LIP on October 1, 2013. Moreno Valley updated its LIP on January 30, 2014 and November 6, 2015. Both

the January 2014 and November 2015 updates were in compliance with the current 2010 MS4 Permit. Moreno Valley's LIP is current to

date. See updated LIP for specifics.

Norco Based on the available program overview parameters, the current state of the Urban Runoff Management Program is found to be effective.

Lake Elsinore

Continued



Perris

On May 24, 2012 the Regional Board notified the Co-permittees that the Local Implementation Plan Template (herein LIP Template) was

found to be acceptable with the incorporation of certain required revisions. The May 24, 2012 letter provided the required revisions, and

noted that the LIP Template was thereby approved with the comments incorporated by reference therein (See attached Exhibit 1). The

Principal Permittee submitted an acceptance letter of the required revisions (See attached Exhibit 2), and established the approval date of the

LIP template as May 24, 2012, which establishes a deadline date of May 24, 2013 for all Co-permittees to complete and implement their

Individual LIP's. The City of Perris'2012/13 Annual Report included the LIP. The City met the deadlines established in Section IV, completing

the LIP within twelve months of the Board approval of the LIP Template and has begun to implement all provisions of the Storm Water

Program as noted in the new LIP. During the course of implementation of the Individual LIP, the City of Perris has incorporated certain

portions of its Amended Storm Water Management Program dated August 8, 2006, updated for the previous NPDES Board Order #R8-2002-

0011 into the Individual LIP created for NPDES Board Order No. R8-2010-0033, and will need to update certain portions of the LIP to reflect

current conditions, for example State Permits may have changed, certain checklists have been updated, etc. However, the City of Perris's new

Individual LIP can be used to run the Program in the City of Perris and implement all the requirements found in NPDES Board Order No.

R8-2010-0033. Appendix 3 of the new Santa Ana Region NPDES Permit #R8-2010-0033 provides a summary of the scheduled activities

required by the new permit. The City of Perris has made progress with implementing each of the required activities, and will address the

outstanding permit elements, including the following: Continue to provide regular updates of the City's Storm Drain Facilities Map to

principal permittee. In prior years although the City provided regular red-lined versions of the City Storm Drain Facilities Map, thereby

keeping an up-to-date inventory of facilities, changes had not been entered into a GIS version of the Map. However, during this reporting

period (FY '15-16), the City converted all existing electronic data of its flood control facilities into a GIS format, and updated its new GIS

map to include new flood control facilities built during the reporting period. The new GIS version is dated October 4, 2016. The Regional

Water Quality Control Board approved the new Water Quality Management Plan Guidance Document (herein new WQMP) (See attached

Exhibit 3) for new and significant redevelopment on October 22, 2012. The City of Perris began transitioning current discretionary

development projects to comply with the New WQMP before December 6, 2012, and full implementation of the requirements of the New

WQMP have been in effect as of April 22, 2013. The City of Perris requires the implementation of the new WQMP including all LID and

Hydromodification Management provisions required within the new WQMP Template guidelines; consistent with the highest and best use

standard exemptions for LID requirements, and the HCOC exemptions. The City of Perris is continuing to review the WQMP program

included in the City's current LIP, to refine the description and materials as needed to address the requirements of the new WQMP, such as

updates of checklists to address road projects and new and significant redevelopment. However, all of these requirements are being

implemented by the City of Perris. On December 23, 2011 the City Attorney's Office issued a certification letter (See attached Exhibit 4)

indicating that the City of Perris' current Ordinance #1194 (P.M.C. 14.22 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND DISCHARGE CONTROLS)

provides City staff with legal authority to enforce the provisions of the new NPDES Permit/Board Order R8-2010-0033. The current

ordinance contains language that assisted developers with the transition date from the San Jacinto permit to the original version of the WQMP

that provided for final sunset dates for approved final WQMP's. Over the course of the next few months City Staff will be requesting that

City Council consider more specific and detailed provisions intended to remove this out-of- date language. This will provide code

enforcement officers with an updated version of all Board order numbers for any future code action. Any approved revisions will be

forwarded to the Regional Water Board during the 2016-17 Annual Report. The City of Perris maintains a record of all enforcement actions

taken against those suspected of violating the City's Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls Ordinance, and continues to issue a

variety of correction notices up to and including court citation for misdemeanor violations. The enforcement procedures have been deemed

adequate. However, the Illicit Connection/Illegal Discharge Monitoring Program for major city "Outfall Areas" will need to be more

thoroughly described in the City's new individual LIP. During the current reporting period the City made substantial progress in documenting

and monitoring outfall areas along the Perris Valley Storm Drain and the San Jacinto River. The City continued with its efforts to further

refine the accuracy of its initial "Outfall Inventory" completed last year (FY '14-15). The initial inventory identified 32 outfalls. During the



reporting period the City placed its inventory on a GIS map. (See attached Exhibit 19). During the reporting period the City determined that

the Outfalls identified as PMP 7, PMP 8, and PMP 10, are actually RCFC & WCD Outfalls. Despite the identification of these 3 outfalls as

RCFC &WCD Outfalls, the City monitored all 32 "Outfall Areas" at least once, and the inspection was documented on the illicit discharge

reporting forms. For clarification, these three outfalls have been identified as RCFC &WCD outfalls on both the Outfall Inventory and on

each of the illicit discharge monitoring forms. No sampling was required, nor was any further investigation required. During the upcoming

reporting period, 2016-17, the initial inventory will be further refined for accuracy. The ownership of each outfall will be updated to reflect

the true ownership, and the remaining portions of the City, including along the San Jacinto River, will be inventoried for the purpose of

identifying additional "Outfall Areas." Once these inventories have been completed, and regular monitoring procedures have been established

in the LIP, a concerted effort will be made by the City to more regularly conduct any required sampling, and by extension, the necessary

follow-up and investigation into suspected illegal connections/illegal discharge. Over the course of the next several months, the City plans

to review the IDDE (Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination) Guidance Manual for Program Development and Technical Assessments

to consider additional methods intended to improve upon its enforcement response procedures and major outfall monitoring program. The

City will make this an annual practice of review, and any changes the City deems useful will be incorporated into the City's new LIP. Areas

of review will include: interdepartmental communication/coordination, timely compliance, third party inspection programs, sampling and

follow-up requirements. The CAP Program, intended to assist co-permittees with their individual Industrial/Commercial Inspection Program

came to an end in December, 2014. During last years reporting period (FY'14-15) the City entered into an Agreement with the Consulting

Firm. After prioritizing the first set of "High," "Medium, and "Low" Commercial and Industrial business, the City's inspection firm completed

the inspection of approximately 113 businesses. Under the City's current LIP, the City of Perris prioritized the frequency of commercial and

industrial business and construction site inspections according to: 1) the results of the County's CAP survey findings for industrial commercial

facilities, 2) complaints received on any construction site or commercial/industrial facility, and 3) according to wet and dry season

prioritization schedule set by construction inspectors for construction sites. The City of Perris has reviewed the LIP against the new

requirements found under Section XI of the new NPDES Permit, and in light of the end of the CAP Program, the City has determined that

changes should be made to the City's Inspection Program prioritization methodology. These changes will be incorporated into the City's LIP,

and revisions will be provided to the Board during the next NPDES reporting Period in FY 2016-17. The City's Storm Water Management

and Discharge Control Ordinance currently provides Enforcement Officers with the authority to impose fines on mobile business' who fail

to provide adequate BMP's for the protection of the City's storm water conveyance system, and the City Officers are currently enforcing the

provisions of the Ordinance. However, On May 4, 2012 the Co-Permittees modified DAMP Section 8 to describe more specific processes

and procedures for regulating mobile business. The City's LIP more fully describes the City's procedures for regulating and enforcing mobile

businesses, but will be updated with specific BMP's and detailed procedures for notification for Mobile businesses in violation. The City of

Perris currently implements a collection of programs (i.e. toxic and household waste collection, WQMP requirements, public education

campaigns, etc.) intended to reduce discharge of pollutants from residential activities, which are described in the City's LIP. The new WQMP

Exhibit D Transportation Project Guidance was developed to provide Co-permittees with standard design and post development BMP

guidance to be incorporated into its municipal road projects. The City of Perris is continuing to review the WQMP program included in the

City's current LIP, to refine the description and materials as needed to address the requirements of the new WQMP, such as updates of

checklists to address road projects and new and significant redevelopment. However, all of these requirements are being implemented by the

City of Perris. New and significant redevelopments have been using the new WQMP, and addressing all requirements of the WQMP, since

December 2012 with full implementation reached in April, 2013. During previous reporting periods the City completed several extensive

inventories of the storm drain system for the purpose of developing RFP's for cleaning and video services, or for retrofit of existing catch

basins with Connector Pipe Screen Units (CPS) and refine grading of natural BMP's.The purpose of installation of CPS units was to provide

for full capture of trash and debris within the catch basins, and reduce the amount of pollutant laden sediment entering the storm drain system.

The inventories included mechanical and natural Post-Construction BMP's installed throughout the City's Flood Control District #1 and

Perris



Landscape Maintenance District #1 (FCD #1 & LMD #1). The Post construction BMP's consist of catch basin insert filters, automatic

retractable screens (ARS), connector pipe screens (CPS), underground hydrodynamic separators (end-of-the-line clean water filter units);

and above ground detention basins, bioswales, and infiltration basins. These inventories have been documented in the following Work

Specifications: FCD # 1.2007-08-02, FCD #1.2007-08-03, FCD #1-2010-11-01, FCD#1-2011-12-01, FCD#1-2011-12-02, LMD #1-2011-

12-03, FCD #1-2012-13-01, and FCD #1-2013-14-05. The inventoried BMP's were inspected and cleaned on either: 1) a six month semi-

annual basis (screen and catch basins), 2) on an annual basis (pipe and hydrodynamic separators), 3) monthly basis (routine maintenance

above ground natural bioswales, detention basins and infiltration basins), and 4) reconstruction/fine grading of detention basins, bioswales,

infiltration trenches as needed or approximately every 2-5 years. The City of Perris included its inventory and maintenance schedules in its

LIP, but plans to continue to refine and will more fully describe its inventory, inspection and maintenance procedures. As a result of the CPS

Retrofit Project, reported in last year's annual report the City of Perris issued a new RFP for catch basin maintenance services for those FCD

Benefit Zones retrofitted with CPS units (See FCD #1-2015-16-01). The new maintenance schedule increases the frequency of catch basin

cleaning from twice a year to three times per year, for those catch basins retrofitted with CPS units. In addition, as a result of the retrofit

project, the pipe cleaning contract originally authorized under FCD #1-2012-13-01 was modified to reduce cleaning of pipe from once a year,

to every two years for those storm drain systems retrofitted with CPS units. The City's LIP will be updated to reflect these maintenance

changes and system descriptions, and the revisions will be provided to the Board in the next 2016-17 NPDES Annual Report. During the

reporting period the City continued with its inventory of mechanical and natural Post-Construction BMP's installed throughout the City's

Flood Control District #1, Landscape Maintenance District #1 and General Fund Areas (FCD #1, LMD #1, FCGF). The City issued two new

Work Specifications including FCD #1-2016-17-01, for maintenance services of natural type BMPs, and FCGF #1-2016-17-02 for video and

maintenance services of pipe and other flood control facilities in existing General Fund Areas or newly constructed Flood Control District

Areas. Services will occur at the same frequency as indicted in the preceding paragraphs. The City made an extensive inventory of all Post

Construction BMP's approved and/or installed for New Development and Significant Development as part of the CNRP data collection effort

(Comprehensive Nutrient Reduction Plan). The approved Post-Construction BMP's were approved as part of the San Jacinto Interim

Construction Permit SWPPP (Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan) and the Riverside County WQMP (Water Quality Management Plan).

These plans provide Post-Construction BMP's for a total of 2,519.37 treatment acres. The Plans provide for certain maintenance and

inspection schedules which are the responsibility of the Owner of the development, and in some cases by the City's landscape and/or flood

control maintenance districts. The City of Perris included its inventory and maintenance schedules in its LIP, but plans to continue to refine

and more fully describe its inventory, inspection and maintenance procedures. During the reporting period the TMDL Task Force executed

the final budget for the Lake Elsinore Aeration and Mixing System. On May 31, 2016 the City of Perris informed LESJWA that the maximum

credit required for the City of Perris is 47.08 hours of LEAMS operation, to reduce 1,035.8 TN kg/yr. Therefore, the City of Perris will

reimburse LESJWA, Administrator of Task Force funds, a total of $14,124.00, annually. (See attached Exhibit 20) The City continues to

update the CNRP inventory with Post Construction BMP's approved and/or constructed since 2010. This is a critical task, as the CNRP was

intended to be implemented using an adaptive process. As described in the CNRP, …"It is unlikely that the stakeholders will implement the

perfect solution on the first try. Rather, success will depend on an iterative process of developing mitigation projects, measuring results,

updating the predictive models and re-fine the follow-on strategy…" According to the current un-amended version of the CNRP, the City of

Perris' load reduction requires 14 hours of LEAMS operation, amounting to a maximum annual LEAMS cost share of $4,200. Naturally, the

disconnect between the published findings of the CNRP and the maximum cost share approved by the Task Force agencies (60.1 hours at

$18,300) resulted in pause by the City of Perris, and the need to re-examine the circumstances resulting in such a dramatic change. The City

engaged the consulting services of Cynthia Gabaldon, PE and Principal of CGRME, to conduct a Special Study, as provided in Section 2.2.4

of the CNRP, to investigate this matter further. The study summarized the findings of our investigation, and formed the basis for the maximum

annual LEAMS cost share that the City of Perris would reimburse LESJWA (47.08 hours at $14,124). The City of Perris' LIP includes

information on its current limited public outreach program, consisting of Channel 3 announcements, storm drain stencils, and handouts at

Perris



public counters and events, and will refine, more fully describe the program, and make any changes necessary to comply with the New Permit

requirements. The City of Perris LIP more fully describes its training requirements for staff. On April 13, 2015 the California State Water

Resources Control Board adopted a new Statewide General NPDES Permit for planned and emergency Drinking Water System Discharges

to Waters of the United States (Board Order Number WQ 2014-0194). The Order required all water purveyors that own/operate community

drinking water systems with 1,000 connections or more to submit either: 1) a complete application package for regulatory coverage, or 2) a

Notice of Non-applicability per the criteria listed on Page 5 of the permit. In accordance with the Scope of Regulatory Coverage and exclusion

provisions found at Section I A. of Board Order Number WQ 2014-0194, the City of Perris submitted a Notice of Non-Applicability for both

of its Drinking Water: 1) City of Perris Water Company- State Board Division of Drinking Water Drinking Water System Permit No.

CA3310029 (AKA City of Perris); and 2) Perris Public Utility Authority- State Board Division of Drinking Water Drinking Water System

Permit No. CA3310029 (AKA North Perris Water System). The City certified that it is a Co-permittee of the existing MS4 Permit, Board

Order R8-2010-0033, NPDES Permit No. CAS 618033. Further the City stated that it shall comply with the terms and conditions of that

Permit under which certain discharges, including those from drinking water systems, are permitted. In accordance with Section VI B.

"Discharge Specifications For Discharges From Permitee Owned/or Operated Facilities and Activities-De Minimus Discharges" of the MS4

Permit (Board Order R8-2010-0033, NPDES Permit No. CAS 618033); the City will adhere to the provisions of Order No. R8-2009-003

NPDES CAG 998001 (General De Minimus Permit) prior to any discharges from the City's Drinking Water System. During the reporting

period the City applied for, and was a granted a DeMinimus Permit for both of its water systems prior to any discharges from its systems.

(See attached Exhibit 16 and Exhibit 16-A). Although the Water Company Administrator had intended to perform the discharges and report

on these activities during this annual reporting period, no such discharges occurred. As explained in a memo dated September 29, 2016, (See

attached Exhibit 21) the Water Administrator cancelled the planned water system flushing scheduled for January, 2016 due to the severe

water shortage and the restrictions placed upon the City by the Governor's Orders on water conservation.

Riverside The City of Riverside continues to implement its Urban Runoff Management Program as defined in the LIP. The City continually evaluates

this program to ensure the protection of the storm drain system and local waterways. As opportunities for improvement are identified, the

LIP will be updated to reflect any changes.

Riverside County The County's LIP was updated and is attached to this annual report.

RCFC&WCD A total of 3,909 work hours were logged in the field assessing District Facilities. In addition, our maintenance staff logged the following

waste removal numbers: Debris: 2,054 tons; Sediment Removed: 42,738 cy; Trash Removed: 82 tons;

San Jacinto The City has reviewed its Urban Runoff Management Programs and determined that they are adequate at this time.

Perris





Provision Nos. VI.D.1.a.v-vii and VI.D.2.c require update of LIPs caused by changes to the DAMP, WQMP, Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake and Middle Santa

Ana River TMDL studies.

PERMITTEE. 1. Please provide a summary of the revisions of your LIP during the 2016-2016 FY resulting from these changes.

Beaumont

The LIP was revised in 2014-2015 reporting period. A copy of the revised LIP was provided to the RCFC&WCD. Since the County has revised

the DAMP and the Water Action Plan (WAP) had not been approved by the Regional Board for the report period, it is not efficient, cost

effective or appropriate to piece meal revision of the City LIP. In addition the Regional Board staff is currently working on a new MS4 Permit

which would likely have additional requirements including but no limited to full trash capture system. It is better to put the revision of the LIP

on-hold until the WAP and new MS4 Permit documents are issued and become effective.

Calimesa The City continues to develop our local implementation plan-LIP template. The City's goal is to have this template in place for FY 16-17 just

in time for major development that will happen in the next two to three years.

Canyon Lake The City of Canyon Lake has updated the LIP to reflect revisions to the DAMP and to ensure compliance with the current Permit.

Corona As noted above, the City of Corona's LIP was adopted on May 24, 2013. The City recently implemented departmental and personnel changes.

We are working to update the LIP for these changes which will be documented in next year's report.

Eastvale The City of Eastvale reviewed and worked on modifications to its LIP during the reporting period but has not yet finalized any changes or

revisions. The City has worked closely with the County and will continue to update the LIP accordingly.

Hemet

The following revisions were made to the City of Hemet LIP due to changes in the DAMP, approval of the CNRP, issuance of a new Industrial

General Permit and a new De Minimus Permit:

1. § - 6.5.10 Post Construction BMP Inspections – Updated to include requirement that privately-owned BMPs implemented on Industrial

facilities must be inspected once every three years; inspection of BMPs implemented on commercial/residential facilities remain once

every five years.

2. § 8.2 - Industrial & Commercial Inspections – Addressed changes to the Industrial/Commercial Inspection Program after the

Compliance Assistance Program (CAP) ended in December 2014. Included a discussion of an interim inspection plan and the ultimate

long-term plan to hire a consultant to provide stormwater inspection services.

3. § 12.2.3 - Added information on requirements of Comprehensive Nutrient Reduction Plan (CNRP), approved by the Regional Board

on 7/19/2013. Section describes specific actions/compliance tasks that have been taken or will be taken by Permittees to achieve

compliance with urban WLA by 12/31/2020.

Appendix B – Inserted copy of new De Minimus General Permit R8-2009-0003 and Monitoring & Reporting Program for R8-2009-0003-027.

Jurupa Valley Only major change to the LIP and DAMP was the ending of the CAP program. All other changes are minor.



Lake Elsinore

Updated language throughout for greater clarification and in compliance with schedules and activities completed on behalf of the Co-

Permittees Technical Advisory Committee.

Section 4.0 Removed reference to CAP program – added use of contract personnel for commercial and industrial inspections. Added new

forms

Section 9.0 & 10 "Residential Sources Program" and "Public Education and Outreach" - Updated program name to reflect change to MS4

marketing program.

Section 12 "TMDL Implementation" – Updated TMDL Implementation Strategy and City's participation in the process.

Menifee The City of Menifee completed the required annual LIP update in June 2016. Program changes are described above. No additional revisions

were made in reference to the DAMP (August 2015), WQMP, or Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake TMDL studies.

Moreno Valley The LIP was updated during the reporting period to address the conclusion of the CAP program and the inspection support from the County

Department of Public Health and to incorporate the efforts instituted by the City to comply with the inspection requirements in the Permit.

Norco No updates to the program this reporting year.

Perris No changes to the LIP occurred during the reporting period, however, as indicated above several revisions will be required and will be reported

in the next NPDES Annual Report.

Riverside For FY2015-2016, no significant revisions were made to the LIP.

Riverside County The County's LIP was updated to reflect programmatic documentation updates and is attached to this annual report.

RCFC&WCD

The District's Local Implementation Plan was updated on June 30, 2016 to include updates to the responsible Division within the District, for

implementation of permit requirements, changes to the Public Education Program name and activities, update regarding the LE/CL TMDL

revision, and the selection of two structural BMPs to address the Bacteria TMDL in the Santa Ana River. The update included the miles of

underground storm drains, open channels, levees and retention basins maintained by the District.

San Jacinto

The City undertook a major revision to the LIP during the period to incorporate changes to the DAMP. Additional revisions were anticipated

in FY 2015-16 as a result of potential approval of the WAP; however, the WAP was not approved by the Regional Board. Additional studies

are underway, and proposed revisions to the LE/CL TMDL include recognition of the impact of Mystic Lake on Zones 7 through 9 of the San

Jacinto River.





Section XVII.A of the Permit requires that the Permittees will evaluate the effectiveness of the Urban Runoff management program described in the DAMP

to determine the need for any revisions in order to reduce Pollutants in MS4 discharges consistent with the MEP standards consistent with the reporting

requirements in Appendix 3, Section IV.B. Section XVII.B requires that the findings of this review and a schedule to address necessary revisions be provided.

PERMITTEE 1. Please provide the findings of this review and a schedule to address necessary revisions

Beaumont The DAMP was revised after June 2016, therefore it was not evaluated the FY 2015-2016. Staff turnover and insufficient The DAMP will be

evaluated in the 2016-2017 fiscal year and changes reflected in the LIP as described earlier at that time.

Calimesa The City has not made any changes or revisions to the DAMP. Our MS4 discharges are consistent with the MEP. The City continues to review

all aspects and will revise as needed or required.

Canyon Lake After the evaluation, the DAMP was updated in June 2016.

Corona

This reporting year, the City continued implementation of the Comprehensive Bacteria Reduction Plan (CBRP) which focuses efforts on

reduction or elimination of dry weather flow to the Receiving Waters in order to meet the dry season urban Waste Load Allocation in the Middle

Santa Ana River Bacterial Indicator TMDL. Having completed the inventory, investigation, and mapping effort of all 101 Outfalls within City

limits in July 2011, staff investigated 37 Outfalls in June 2014 for illicit discharges. The 37 Outfalls met the monitoring criteria as IC/ID

violations were not detected. The City continued implementation of the revised Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for Urban Runoff

per Permit section XII.D which includes requirements for LID BMPs. In 2014, a review of our Storm Water Quality ordinance indicated an

update was necessary to incorporate the latest definitions and provisions of the newly approved WQMP guidance document. Staff updated the

Storm Water Quality Ordinance in order to ensure it reflected the latest WQMP provisions and definitions per the Permit. As such, staff

coordinated with legal counsel to prepare and incorporate the updates as well as other minor modifications to enhance the City's ability to

enforce the Permit. The updated Ordinance (No. 3164) was approved at the March 19, 2014 City Council meeting. The City also continued to

maintain a post construction BMP database to track the operation and maintenance of the structural post construction BMPs per Permit section

XII.K. The industrial commercial facility and construction site inspections continued per the compliance schedules and assigned priorities

defined in Permit Section XI. Compliance was documented in our Industrial/Commercial and Construction inspection databases. In addition,

the mobile business notification program continued to be implemented per Permit Section XI.D.6. This year staff investigated 72 incidences

of spills and/ or potential illegal pollutant discharges to the storm drain system. Additionally, staff responded to 113 calls regarding drainage

of swimming pools and spas. There has been a gradual increase in calls in recent years (36 calls in 2011, 76 in 2012, 99 in 2013, 102 in 2014,

and 108 in 2015) – especially when comparing the 2011 & 2012 numbers, which are likely due to focused outreach on proper drainage

procedures provided through utility bills, City website, educational materials distributed at City events, etc. Enforcement to achieve compliance

involved distributing educational materials, verbal warnings, and follow-up inspections. Lastly, staff issued 7 Notices of Violation this reporting

year which we have found to be an effective tool in bringing sites into compliance. The City also continued its "20% by 2020" water conservation

campaign. The City enacted Stage 3 of its Water Conservation Ordinance in response to the Governor's executive order issued April 1, 2015

and to meet the goal of 28% overall reduction in potable water use. Stage 3 rules include the following measures to limit dry weather runoff:

Three day per week watering with a maximum of 10 minutes per station

No watering between 10am and 8pm

Watering during and within 48 hours after rainfall measuring ½" or more is prohibited



Leaks and broken sprinklers must be fixed in a timely manner

Water cannot be allowed to runoff property

Washing hard surfaces is prohibited

Vehicles can only be watered using a bucket and hose with an automatic shut-off nozzle

The City enforces this ordinance through public education. The City has staff available to educate residents on how they can meet these goals

and respond to any complaints. Additionally the City has accelerated turf removal projects in City parkways and reclaimed water conversions.

The increased efforts on water conservation will result in decreased dry weather runoff and therefore a reduction in potential pathogenic

discharges from urban runoff into the Receiving Waters. The City's public outreach and education program continued this year, increasing

public awareness through residential, commercial and industrial outreach programs. These programs are currently being evaluated as part of

the CBRP to determine if additional programs targeted at bacteria reduction are necessary.

Eastvale

Upon evaluating the Urban Runoff management program described in the DAMP it is determined there is no need for any revisions in order to

reduce Pollutants in MS4 discharges consistent with the MEP standard. The City continues to review all aspects and will revise as needed and

report as required.

Hemet All necessary revisions have been made.

Jurupa Valley Only major change to the LIP and DAMP was the ending of the CAP program. All other changes are minor.

Lake Elsinore

The City's review of the Urban Runoff management program as described in the DAMP did not identify any areas of non-compliance. It is the

City's determination that the program(s) outlined in the DAMP are sufficient to reduce pollutants in discharges to the MS4 to the MEP standard.

(see Table 2)

Menifee The City reviewed the effectiveness of the program during 2015-16 and determined that there was no need for revisions.

Moreno Valley

IV.B.2.(a)—The City has reviewed and evaluated its program and implementation of the various tasks. Funding exists for the program as

addressed in the LIP.

IV. B.2.(b)—The City utilizes Underground Service Alert to detect IC/ID to the MS4. During this reporting period no IC/IDs were detected

through USA. See this report for additional IC/ID enforcement and metrics.

IV.B.2.(c): See FY 2015/16 Monitoring Report provided by RCFCD.

IV.B.2.(d): See FY 2015/16 Monitoring Report provided by RCFCD.

IV.B.2(e): See FY 2015/16 Monitoring Report provided by RCFCD.

IV.B.2(f): See FY 2015/16 Monitoring Report provided by RCFCD.

IV.B.2(g): See FY 2015/16 Monitoring Report provided by RCFCD.

IV,B.2(h): See FY 2015/16 Monitoring Report provided by RCFCD.

IV.B.2(i)—See Section 2 above.

IV.B.2(j)—During this reporting period businesses were inspected per the Order's metrics. Construction sites are inspected based upon the

Order's metrics. 80% or greater of the City's open channels, catch basins, and retention/detention basins were inspected, cleaned and maintained

in compliance with the Order's metrics. Publicly maintained streets are scheduled to be swept twice monthly. 33 extended detention basins

and/or vegetated swales are publicly maintained by the City. Appropriate staff received NPDES training based upon the Order's metric. Facility

Pollution Prevention Plans (FPPPs) were reviewed and Municipal Facilities were inspected. The City Manager or designated Representative

attended the Management Steering Committee meetings per the Order's metrics. The Storm Water Program Manager attended the NPDES

TAC per the Order's metrics. The City continued as an active participant in the LE/CL TMDL Task Force. The City participated in the

Corona



continuing Alum Treatment application to Canyon Lake. The City will work with other stakeholders to address Fishery Management and

Aeration of Lake Elsinore per the CNRP. The City continued to implement its IC/ID program. The City continued to maintain a database to

track operation and maintenance of post-construction BMPs pursuant to this Order's requirements. The database is updated annually. The City

continued to file PRDs/NOIs/and NOTs pursuant to the CGP for its capital improvement projects. The City prepared a Storm Water Budget to

comply with this Order.

IV.B.2(k)—N/A

IV.B.2(l)—See Appendix G of the Consolidated Annual Report.

IV.B.2(m)—The ordinances have been reviewed for compliance with this Order, the DAMP, the WQMP, and the LIP. The City does enforce

New Development/Significant Redevelopment Priority Projects to construct and maintain post-construction BMPs. . Commercial and

Industrial Businesses inspections are contracted by a consultant to perform, in compliance with this Order.

Norco Based on the available program overview parameters, the current state of the Urban Runoff Management Program is found to be effective.

Perris

To date the Lead Permittee has coordinated the need for any revisions to the DAMP (I.e. WQMP revisions, LIP Template, Municipal Facility

SSPPP Template, IC/ID Program, CNRP monitoring, etc.) with the individual Co-Permittees to complete the required tasks. This year the only

change that occurred to the DAMP revolved around the end of the CAP Program, which was described in the preceding paragraphs and reported

on during the Fiscal Year 2014-15 annual report; and changes to the Unified Sanitary Sewer Spill Response Procedures. (See attached Exhibit

17).

Riverside

The City of Riverside continues its sustained effort to implement the DAMP and LIP in the most effective manner possible. Throughout the

fiscal year, City staffs from multiple departments have worked hard to ensure the protection of the storm drain system and local waterways.

The departments and divisions coordinating and implementing these programs include:

Riverside County

The County continues to review its processes and procedures to ensure MS4 permit provisions (and associated documents) are protective of

receiving water quality. TLMA continues to absorb additional responsibility for running day to day operations of the NPDES program. There

may be a time in the immediate future where the Executive Office provides a support role to TLMA. If this becomes the case, all documents

will be updated to reflect this change.

RCFC&WCD

New MS4 Permit Development

The Permittee's ROWD was submitted on July 29, 2014; the 2010 MS4 Permit expired on January 29, 2015 and was administratively

extended until the effective date of the new permit. Permit negotiations are the program's primary focal point throughout FY 2016-2017.

New Development

Continued development of the following Watershed Action Plan (WAP) Components: the Regional Geodatabase, Hydromodification

Susceptibility Mapping and Report, the Hydromodification Management Plan (HMP), and the Retrofit Study. Per 2010 MS4 Permit

requirements, a draft WAP was submitted by the Permittees for Regional Board approval on January 29, 2013; the Permittees received

comments from the Regional Board, and re-submitted the revised WAP on June 24, 2013. The Permittees received comments from the

Regional Board on the revised WAP, HMP, and Hydromodification Susceptibility Mapping and Report on December 18, 2013 and March

21, 2014, respectively. The WAP, HMP, and Hydromodification Susceptibility Mapping and Report were re-submitted to the Regional

Board on May 29, 2014 and again on January 7, 2015. The District, on behalf of the Permittees, continues to meet with the Regional Board

to finalize the WAP and supporting Hydromodification documents. The WAP was submitted again on June 18, 2015. Once approved, the

DAMP will be updated to include language from the approved WAP and supporting documents.

The District has gathered common questions and concerns about the WQMP Guidance Document, Template and Glossary, and created an

errata on June 30, 2016. The errata changes will be updated in the WQMP Guidance Document in FY16-17.

Moreno Valley



Aquatic Weed Control NPDES Permit Compliance

Compliance with the Aquatic Weed Control NPDES Permit is required for vegetation control activities which utilize application of aquatic

herbicides on District facilities. Vegetation control is an essential part of the District's routine maintenance activities in order to ensure that

its facilities continue to provide the design level of flood protection to which they were constructed and minimize or prevent loss of life and

property. Compliance with the Aquatic Weed Control NPDES Permit includes maintaining an aquatic pesticide application plan,

implementing BMPs to minimize potential impacts from the use of herbicides, monitoring for impacts to water quality, and submittal of an

annual report to the Regional Board and State Water Board.

Municipal Facilities and Activities

Continued to implement the provisions of the NPDES Permit's Municipal Facilities Strategy as described in the DAMP, including

improvements to structural facilities at the District's headquarters, municipal employee training activities, and reduction and/or elimination

of stormwater pollution sources at public agency facilities.

Water Quality Monitoring

Continued collection and analysis of water quality samples in accordance with the Permit's Monitoring and Reporting Program via the

Consolidated Monitoring Program (CMP) for water quality monitoring. Water quality samples are collected during dry and wet weather at

MS4 outfalls and receiving water stations, and are analyzed for required constituents to ensure compliance with the 2010 MS4 Permit.

The CMP for water quality monitoring describes the monitoring efforts that will be implemented to comply with the County's three MS4

Permits. Specifically, the Santa Ana Region Monitoring Plan (CMP Volume IV) was updated in August 2012 to comply with the 2010

MS4 Permit. It is reviewed annually, and was updated July 2014, and again in November 2014 with minor errata to reflect current methods

and improvements based on program information. Minor corrections were made to Water Quality Objective tables to reflect the Basin Plan

update. The 2014 CMP updates are applicable to the 2015-2016 monitoring year. The CMP includes procedures for collection and analysis

of water quality samples at Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems' (MS4) outfalls and receiving waters sites for a variety of constituents.

The CMP also includes monitoring efforts for the LE/CL TMDL, MSAR TMDL development, Hydromodification Monitoring, LID

Monitoring, and participation in the Regional Watershed Monitoring through membership with the Southern California Stormwater

Monitoring Coalition (SMC). These additional monitoring components and Special Studies have stand-alone work plans that have been

developed and approved for these components independently of the CMP.

Continued participation in the SMC, a regional monitoring group comprised of Southern California Phase 1 Municipal NPDES Permit

holders whose focus is developing effective, meaningful stormwater quality monitoring techniques. This included a 2009–2013 regional

effort and involved the participation of approximately 20 public agency participants. It included the stratification of 15 watersheds for the

overall south coast region of California, which spanned from Ventura County to San Diego County. The goal was to monitor 450 sites

overall (i.e., approximately 90 sites per year); however, with collaboration, results from 545 sites region-wide were included in the

assessment of over 4,350 miles of streams in the southern coast region of California. The final report was published in May 2015 and can

be found on the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project and/or SMC websites. Based on the findings and lessons learned from

this effort, a revised study design has commenced for the 2015-2019 regional monitoring effort.

Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs)

Continued participation in the Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake Nutrient TMDL Task Force. The Task Force is comprised of stakeholders

regulated by the Regional Board through the Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake Nutrient TMDL (LE/CL TMDL), which was adopted on December

17, 2004. The District also participates in another TMDL Task Force for the Reach 3 Santa Ana River Pathogen Indicator TMDL (MSAR

TMDL), which was adopted on August 26, 2005. The purpose of both Task Forces is to implement joint requirements of the TMDLs, to

address these impairments and implement the TMDLs. The agreements for both Task Forces were recently renewed and have a term of five

RCFC&WCD



(5) years. The current task force agreements are set to expire on June 17, 2017 for the LE/CL TMDL Task Force, and December 1, 2017

for the MSAR TMDL Task Force.

The Permittees utilized the LE/CL TMDL Task Force to implement the approved Comprehensive Nutrient Reduction Plan (CNRP) which

includes an alum treatment project for Canyon Lake, as well as the continued funding and aeration of the Lake Elsinore Aeration and Mixing

System. The services of a consultant (Amec Foster Wheeler) were secured to perform monitoring requirements of the LE/CL TMDL Phase

2 Compliance Monitoring Program.

The Permittees utilized the MSAR TMDL Task Force Agreement to facilitate the hiring of a consultant to aid in the implementation of the

Comprehensive Bacteria Reduction Plan (CBRP) for those Permittees named in the TMDL within Riverside County. The CBRP was approved

at the February 10, 2012 Regional Board meeting and is currently in the implementation phase. Specifically, the consultant (CDM Smith, Inc.)

was contracted to develop a monitoring program to identify and quantify uncontrollable sources of bacteria in the Middle Santa Ana River

Watershed. The consultant finished field monitoring activities in January 2016. A final report is currently in development that will identify

natural sources of bacteria in the watershed and give a range of counts of bacteria associated with each identified source.

San Jacinto The City conducted a review and determined that no changes are needed at this time.

RCFC&WCD


PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION Section 5 – Illicit Connections/Illegal Discharges Page 5-1

5. ILLICIT CONNECTIONS/ILLEGAL DISCHARGES

Provision IX of the 2010 MS4 Permit requires the Permittees to prohibit IC/IDs to the MS4 through

their stormwater ordinances and the District must do so through its statutory authority.

Actions to Investigate and Eliminate IC/ID

When a potential IC/ID has been identified during MS4 monitoring or receiving water monitoring

the District notifies the Permittee having jurisdiction so that they implement the proper follow-up

procedures in accordance with their LIP, and in general conformance with the guidance provided

in the CMP as appropriate. The Permittees' current efforts to control IC/IDs are summarized in

Table 5-1.

Field Reconnaissance Activity

In addition to the IC/ID investigations during monitoring, the Permittee implemented a field

reconnaissance activity to identify IC/IDs. The field reconnaissance focused on investigating all

major outfalls within its jurisdiction. This effort was required to be completed within the term of

the MS4 Permit (i.e., by January 29, 2015). An update on this effort has been provided in database

form.

When it has been determined that an observed discharge warrants investigation, such as when field

parameter thresholds are exceeded (CMP Section 5), a source investigation was conducted by the

Permittee.

Results Database

All sampling data collected as part of the IC/ID monitoring program, including incident response

information are tracked individually by each Permittee and included in Appendix K. In

compliance with the Permit (Sections III.A.1.m and IX.H), for the field reconnaissance effort, the

District tracks and compiles information that is gathered and entered by the Permittees into an

IC/ID database. The database will consist of a master spreadsheet that has been developed and

formatted by the District. The master spreadsheet is included in Appendix K.

Training

IC/ID and Safety Training is for the Santa Ana Region Permittees and meets the requirements

outlined in Section IX.E of the SAR Permit, Volume 5: Santa Ana Region Monitoring Plan, and

Appendix J of the Quality Assurance Project Plan. Permittee staff responsible for conducting IC/ID

inspections receive annual training regarding the following topics:

Background on SAR Monitoring and Reporting Program (MRP)

IC/ID Program Components

Sampling Safety

Meter Calibration, Operation and Maintenance

Field Site Visit (hands-on sampling)



ILLICIT CONNECTIONS/ILLEGAL DISCHARGES 2015-2016 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT


PERMITTEE

Please provide the following metrics for assessment of the effectiveness of the IC/ID program:

1. Number of

IC/ID reports

received:

2. Percent of IC/IDs

sampled that

exceeded criteria and

required follow-up:

3. Number of IC/IDs

sampled that exceeded

criteria and required

follow-up:

4. Percent of enforcement actions

that reached each level of

enforcement:

5. Number of

enforcement actions

that reached each level

of enforcement:

Beaumont 0 0% 0 0% 0

Calimesa 0 0% 0 0% 0

Canyon Lake 19 0% 0 Education 0%/Verbal 0%/Written

100%

Education 0/Verbal

0/Written 19

Corona 72 0%

0

25% Verbal Warnings 8%

Notice of Violation

7% City Abatement

18 Verbal Warnings

6 Notices of Violation

(2 issued at one

location) 5 City

Abatements

Eastvale 8 25% 2 0% 0

Hemet 2 0% 0 100% - Notification Level 2 - Notification level

Jurupa Valley 0 N/A 0 N/A Inspections required

follow up inspection to

verify correction.

Lake Elsinore 33 0% 0 Education 66%/Verbal

27%/Written .03% Notice of

violation or noncompliance 10%

Education 22/Verbal

9/Written 01

Menifee 17 0% 0 100% 17

Moreno Valley

122 0% 0 Education 5%/Notice of Violation

36%/ Administrative Compliance

Order 36%

Education 6/Notice of

Violation or

noncompliance

44/Administrative

Compliance Order 7

Norco 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Perris 7 0% 0 100% 7

Riverside 663 0% 0 110 38%



Riverside County 13 N/A N/A 38.46 5

RCFC&WCD 17 0% 0 0% 0

San Jacinto 0 0% 0 0% 0

TABLE 5-1 ILLICIT CONNECTIONS/ILLEGAL DISCHARGES




Provision No. IX.D and Provision No. IX.E of the MS4 Permit requires the Permittees to review and revise their IC/ID program to include a pro-active IDDE

using the Guidance Manual f Illicit Discharge, Detection, and Elimination by the Center for Watershed Protection or any other equivalent program by July 29,

2011. Provision No. IX.G of the MS4 Permit requires the Permittees to review and evaluate their IC/ID program, including liter/trash BMPs, to determine if the

program needs to be adjusted. The results of this review shall be reported in the Annual Report and include a description of the Permittees revised pro-active

IDDE program, procedures and schedules.

PERMITTEE 1. Please provide a description of the revised procedures and schedules from the annual review and evaluation of the Permittee IC/ID

program.

Beaumont No update was made to the City's IC/ID program.

Calimesa

The City of Calimesa continues to enforce, operate, and adhere to our IC/ID program, which reflects the IDDE elements using the above

referenced manual. The City's IC/ID program continues to effectively work and therefore no revisions have been made during this reporting

period. The City will continue to monitor the effectiveness of our IC/ID program and revise as necessary. The City continues to educate the

public about illegal discharges and pollution prevention. We continue to integrate IC/ID detection and elimination into our inspection programs,

training of Permittee staff, and monitoring data collection. The City maintains and manages our IC/ID database summarizing IC/ID incident

response.

Canyon Lake

The City of Canyon Lake is proactive in ensuring compliance with the MS4 Permit IC/ID requirements and regularly reviews the Canyon Lake

Municipal Code. The Canyon Lake Property Owner Association (POA) Community Patrol, Marine Patrol, the City of Canyon Lake Special

Enforcement and Code Enforcement Officers perform visual inspections, monitor discharge sites, educate the public and perform periodic water

quality tests. In order to comply with water quality regulations enforced by the State through the local Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control

Board, the Lake Elsinore & Canyon Lake Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Task Force started using a state funded grant for Alum

treatments, which began in September 2013. When alum is added to the lake, it binds immediately with the phosphorous and effectively removes

the opportunity for algae to grow. With less algae in the water, light can penetrate deeper into the lake allowing plants to grow at the bottom

while improving the overall health and water quality of the lake for the life of the fish. Applications have taken place in September 2013,

February 2014, September 2014, May 2015, September 2015, May 2016 and September 2016. The City continues to maintain signage on all

City owned drains with "Only Rain Down the Drain" provided by Riverside County Flood Control. All applicable Ordinances in the Municipal

Code are continually reviewed and updated for compliance. The City of Canyon Lake performs an annual cleanup of the community and Bureau

of Land Management (BLM) lands. In addition, Special Enforcement Officers patrol twice a week to remove trash and debris from within the

community and BLM lands. The passing of Urgency Ordinance 134U has led to a substantial decrease in trash and debris in the BLM lands.

The City has reviewed the IC/ID program and found our litter/trash BMPs to be sufficient.

Corona

The City reviewed and revised its IC/ID program to reflect the IDDE elements using the above referenced guidance manual. The proposed

IC/ID program (including procedures and schedules) was incorporated into Volume IV of the CMP which was submitted to the Santa Ana

Regional Board on May 31, 2011 by Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District on behalf of the Co-Permittees. The

CMP was approved by the Santa Ana Regional Board in a letter dated March 26, 2012. City staff responsible for completing the IC/ID outfall

investigations attended a half-day training seminar sponsored by the Principal Permittee wherein staff learned about proper sampling protocols

and investigation techniques. The City also obtained a pH and Conductivity meter for use on future investigations. City staff completed IC/ID

investigations in June of 2014. No IC/ID at the outfalls were noted this year.



Eastvale The City Inspectors or Code Enforcement Officers will note and report any IC/ID situations to the Program Manager for follow up actions and

record purposes. The City also has public reporting software and will receive public notices about IC/ID events as well.

Hemet The annual review of the City of Hemet IC/ID program did not result in any revised procedures or schedules.

Jurupa Valley

The City of Jurupa Valley doesn't have an IC/ID problem. Most of the IC/ID issues are handled by the water/sewer providers (mainly JCSD

and RCSD.) The City of Jurupa Valley does has a litter, debris and trash control problem. The City has two waste providers Burrtec and Waste

Management. They have liberal policies for pickup of large objects and trash accumulations. Despite that, the city continually picks up loads

of sofas, beds, and other furniture, tires and trash from the public right-of-way. The City sends staff to any reports of dumping and illicit

discharges to review situation and make a report.

Lake Elsinore

Procedure

Develop SOP for interaction on non-jurisdictional IC/ID Reports – Appendix 5

Obtain backup assistance from Code Enforcement Div. for responding to IC/ID complaints

Develop and implement Investigative Report Form – Appendix 5

Developed a schedule for major outfall and open channel dry weather inspection – Appendix 6

Set procedure for major outfall and open channel dry weather inspection – Appendix 6

Establish new procedure with form to ensure all post construction facilities are documented during and after construction as built according to plan.

EXHIBIT M

Reviewed and revised IC/ID enforcement activity escalation schedule

Menifee The City reviewed the effectiveness of the program during 2015-16 and determined that there was no need for revisions.

Moreno Valley

The City Moreno Valley reviewed and revised its IC/ID program to reflect the IDDE elements using the above referenced guidance manual. The

proposed IC/ID program (including procedures and schedules) was incorporated into Volume IV of the CMP which was submitted to the Santa

Ana Regional Board on May 31, 2011 by Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District on behalf of the Co-Permittees. The

CMP was approved by the Santa Ana Regional Board in a letter dated March 26, 2012. IC/ID investigations are ongoing and due to be completed

by the end of the Permit term.

Norco

The City has reviewed their OC/ID program to compare the IDDE elements using the above referenced guidance manual. The IC/ID Program

(with procedures and schedule) was incorporated into volume IV of the CMP. The City's program will continue as it has in the past. All reports

of possible illegal connections are investigated with enforcement actions taken as necessary. Routine maintenance and inspection are made and

if any illegal connection is found, follow-up action/enforcement is taken.

Perris

The proposed IC/ID program (including procedures and schedules) was incorporated into Volume IV of the CMP which was submitted to the

Santa Ana Regional Board on May 31, 2011 by Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District on behalf of the Co-Permittees.

The CMP was approved by the Santa Ana Regional Board in a letter dated March 26, 2012. IC/ID investigations are ongoing and due to be

completed by the end of the Permit term. The enforcement procedures for reported incidents have been deemed adequate. However, the Illicit

Connection/Illegal Discharge Monitoring Program for major city "Outfall Areas" will need to be more thoroughly described in the City's new

individual LIP. During the upcoming reporting period, 2016-17, the initial inventory that the City conducted will be refined for accuracy, and the

remaining portions of the City, including along the San Jacinto River, will be inventoried for the purpose of identifying additional "Outfall Areas."

The City currently has identified and actively monitors 32 "Outfall Areas." (Note that three of the areas PMP 7, 8 and 10 are RCFC&WCD

Outfalls) Once these inventories have been completed, and regular monitoring procedures have been established in the LIP, a concerted effort

will be made by the City to more regularly conduct any required sampling, and by extension, the necessary follow-up and investigation into

suspected illegal connections/illegal discharge.



Riverside

The City of Riverside reviewed and revised their IC/ID program to reflect the IDDE elements using the above referenced guidance manual. The

proposed IC/ID program (including procedures and schedules) was incorporated into Volume IV of the CMP which was submitted to the Santa

Ana Regional Board on May 31, 2011 by Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District on behalf of the Co-Permittees. The

CMP was approved by the Santa Ana Regional Board in a letter dated March 26, 2012.

Riverside County The Code Enforcement Department added a procedure to notify the Transportation Department when a discharge begins/occurs in the road-

right-of-way.

RCFC&WCD

The proposed IC/ID program (including procedures and schedules) was incorporated into Volume IV of the CMP which was submitted to Santa

Ana Regional Board staff on May 31, 2011 by the District on behalf of the Co-Permittees. The CMP was approved, with conditions, by the

Santa Ana Regional Board in a letter dated March 26, 2012. Regional Board comments were addressed in the November 2012 Volume IV of

the CMP draft. IC/ID investigations are ongoing throughout the Permit term.

San Jacinto No revision to procedures and schedules were necessary.





Provision No. IX.H of the MS4 Permit requires the Permittees to maintain and update a database summarizing IC/ID incident response (including IC/IDs

detected as part of field monitoring activities).

PERMITTEE 1. Please provide an updated electronic copy of the SAR Permittee ICID Spreadsheet.

Beaumont An updated copy of the SAR ICID Spreadsheet is provided.

Calimesa See exhibit "D" as reference.


Corona SEE ATTACHMENT 'A'

Eastvale

Incident Date Violation Pollutants/Quantity EnforcementAction(s) Disposition

1/21/2016 Wash water runoff Soapy and dirty water

from trash enclosure

Enforcement letter sent to owner and

business

Fixed

9/18/2015 Discharge water full of

sediment

Unquantifiable amount

of dirty wash water

discharged

Verbal warning and requested to clean up

immediately

Fixed

8/22/2015 Paint runoff collecting in

gutter and flowing into

storm drain

Paint water from

backyard work leaking

into gutter


immediately

Problem cleaned

immediately and Fixed

2/2/2016 Oil Spill In street Oil spill/ unquantifiable

amount

No responsible party found Fixed

2/4/2016 Gas leak from vehicle in

street

Gas leak from vehicle No gas reached storm drain and was

cleaned properly

Fixed

2/25/2016 Asphalt tack leak down

street into church storm

water drains into JCSD

flood channel

Asphalt tack about 300

to 400 gallons

Flow blocked off and cleaned by Starlite

Hazmat

Cleaned and waste

removed by Starlite

Hazmat services

4/22/2016 Paint spilled into gutter and

ran down road

Paint spilled into gutter

and ran down road


immediately

Fixed

4/14/2016 Grease container partially

spilled and ran into privately

owned detention basin and

no storm drains

Used cooking oil Requested business get hazmat/or collect

wash water to sanitary sewer and had them

clean immediately

Storm water reinspection

completed. Problem

cleaned and fixed.

Hemet SEE ATTACHMENT B

Jurupa Valley During this reporting period the City created an IC/ID spreadsheet that came online beginning of FY16/17 and will be available with the

FY16/17 Annual Report.



Lake Elsinore EXHIBIT U

Menifee

The SAR Permittee ICID spreadsheet from 2014-15 field monitoring activities is attached as Attachment C. Additionally, Attachment B

is an IC/ID 2015-16 tracking spreadsheet for third-party complaints and those IC/IDs associated with an inspection program with case

details.

Moreno Valley See Attachment B

Norco None this year.

Perris

The Illicit Connection/Illegal Discharge Monitoring Program for major city "Outfall Areas" will need to be more thoroughly described in

the City's new individual LIP. During the reporting period the City determined that the Outfalls identified as PMP 7, PMP 8, and PMP 10,

are actually RCFC & WCD Outfalls. Despite the identification of these 3 outfalls as RCFC &WCD Outfalls, the City monitored all 32

"Outfall Areas" at least once, and the inspection was documented on the illicit discharge reporting forms. This inventory has been

documented in the City's Outfall inventory and attached hereto as Exhibit 19, and are also included in the IC/ID Inventory and Summary

Exhibit 18. The summary lists no incidents of IC/ID to report. No sampling was required, nor was any further investigation required.

During the upcoming reporting period, 2016-17, the initial inventory will be refined for accuracy, and the remaining portions of the City,

including along the San Jacinto River, will be inventoried for the purpose of identifying additional "Outfall Areas." Once these inventories

have been completed, and regular monitoring procedures have been established in the LIP, a concerted effort will be made by the City to

more regularly conduct any required sampling, and by extension, the necessary follow-up and investigation into suspected illegal

connections/illegal discharge. At this time the City conducts monthly inspections of certain outfalls, open channels and swales in

conjunction with quarterly cleaning of these channels. These outfall, channel and swale areas have been inventoried in the City's bid

document FCD #1-2016-17-01. The bid document indicates that quarterly inspections (5x per year) and cleaning occurred at these

locations.

Riverside See attached IC/ID spreadsheet summarizing the City's efforts to identify previously unknown IC/IDs. In addition, Table 2 in the Legal

Authority/Enforcement section summarizes IC/ID incident responses.

Riverside County Please see attached document titled: Santa Ana Water Board Cases Opened IC/ID FY 15/16.

RCFC&WCD A PDF of the database is provided in Appendix E (NPDES Complaints).

San Jacinto City does not have staff levels to maintain database. Copies of IC/ID incident reports are filed with the Public Works Department

manually.





Provision No. IX.J of the MS4 Permit requires the Permittees to assess their programs to eliminate the discharge of trash and debris to Waters

of the U.S. to the MEP.

PERMITTEE 1. Please provide the estimated tons trash and debris removed from your Permittee MS4 facilities. This data will also be used in the assessment of the effectiveness of this program element.

Beaumont 12.9 tons. The City utilizes the services of an outside contractor to sweep city streets regularly and also active construction projects also employ

their own street cleaning and sediment removal crews our estimate of debris removal is highly conservative,

Calimesa 16 tons

Canyon Lake 62.13 tons

Corona

4.7 tons from catch basins

39 tons from debris basins & open channels

2,522 tons from street sweeping

Eastvale N/A

Hemet 14 tons

Jurupa Valley

The City cleaned 1,028 of its 1,038 catch basins during the 2015-2016 fiscal year. All the basins are located on our GIS system available in the

field using tablets. Our program enables notes to be applied to each basin. The crew inputs approximate tonnage removed from every catch

basin cleaned. Their approximate numbers are then verified using samples removed from the field back in the City Hall yard.

Lake Elsinore 592 tons (FY 14/15 308.61 tons)

Menifee 46.8 tons (catch basin cleaning)

Moreno Valley 2202 tons (street sweeping, open channel cleaning and catch basin cleaning)

Norco 115 tons

Perris 1229.31 tons3

Riverside 4,773 tons from Street Sweeping; 764 cubic yards (estimate of 390 tons) from Drain Cleaning; Total 5,163 tons

Riverside County 31 tons

RCFC&WCD Debris: 2,054 tons; Sediment Removed: 42,738 cy; Trash Removed: 82 tons;

San Jacinto Street Sweeping: 600 tons Catch basins, Channels and Inlets: 800 tons.





Provision No. XVI.D of the MS4 Permit requires the Permittees to summarize all spill incidents involving reportable quantities of Hazardous Waste per 40CFR

117 and 302.

PERMITTEE 1. Please provide a summary of all spill incidents involving reportable quantities of Hazardous Waste per 40CFR 117 and 302:

Beaumont None Reported.

Calimesa The City has nothing to report during this reporting period; however, we will continue to monitor and enforce any hazardous waste incidents, as

required.

Canyon Lake The City of Canyon Lake had no incidents with reportable quantities of hazardous waste during

the fiscal year.

Corona See Attached report from Fire Department on all calls potentially involving Hazardous Waste (ATTACHMENT 'F').

Eastvale See Attachment H for the Cal OES Report and Closure Report from Starlite Hazmat Cleanup from a tack spill that occurred at 3190 Cornerstone

Drive at the NPL facility.

Hemet There were no spill incidents in 2015-2016 involving reportable quantities of Hazardous Waste per 40CFR 117 and 302.

Jurupa Valley There was an illicit discharge of what was believed to be diesel fuel inside an industrial park area. The incident was report to Riverside Hazmat

team and they took lead on the investigation. The property owners were required to clean the area of discharge.

Lake Elsinore None to report.

Menifee There were no spill incidents involving reportable quantities of hazardous waste in 2015-16.

Moreno Valley There were no incidents during the reporting period.

Norco -

Perris

The Code Enforcement staff issued notices of violation and citations for spills and other illegal activities. However, based upon the nature of the

spill, and the quantities of the spills observed, it was not necessary to report the spill to the Riverside County Department of Hazardous Waste.

The Code of Federal Regulations, found at 40 CFR Part 117.3, references the list of hazardous substances found in Table 302.4, then provides a

summary of those substances in Table 117.3. Table 117.3 also provides the "Reportable Quantities" for each individual hazardous substance. The

reportable quantities vary between 1 pound and 5,000 pounds depending on the substance.

Riverside No spill incidents involving reportable quantities of Hazardous Waste per 40CFR 117 and 302 during the reporting period.

Riverside County N/A

RCFC&WCD See PDF of complaints database in Appendix E.

San Jacinto None reported.


PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION Section 6 – Private Development Construction Activity Page 6-1

6. PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY

The initial Construction Site Inspection Program element was described in the

Enforcement/Compliance Strategy (E/CS) as required by the 1996 MS4 Permit. The Construction

Site Inspection program has been an effective element of the SAR DAMP.

INVENTORY DATABASE

In conformance with Provision No. XI.B.1 of the 2010 MS4 Permit, each Permittee continues to

maintain and update an inventory database (or databases) of construction sites for which they have

issued a building or grading permit. These databases are updated with new projects when the project

is issued a building or grading permit or when the pre-construction meeting has occurred. Projects

are removed from the database when construction is complete and the project's building or grading

permit is closed. The inventory and database was initiated in October 2003 and was first reported in

the 2003 Annual Report. An example of the inventory database is included in Appendix L.

Permittee databases are included with the respective Permittee submittal section of this report under

Appendix J.

Provision XI.B.2 of the 2010 MS4 Permit requires each Permittee to inspect all inventoried

construction sites, document relevant site information and include it into the inventory database. In

establishing priorities for inspection of construction sites, each Permittee shall also prioritize

construction sites as high, medium, or low threat to receiving water quality.

Provision XI.A.2 and XI.B.3 of the 2010 MS4 Permit requires that each Permittee also conduct

construction site inspections for compliance with its ordinances, including its stormwater ordinance,

regulations, codes and the WQMP, and that each Permittee document the number of inspections and

actions taken then summarize and report on those actions annually.

When conducting construction site inspections, the Permittees' construction site inspectors, at a

minimum, address the following items:

For projects of one acre or more, verify that an NOI has been submitted via the State

Board SMARTS system. Verification is typically made by reviewing a printed copy of

the NOI showing the WDID number issued for the site. As Permittees become aware of

changes in ownership, Permittees will notify SARWQCB staff.

For projects of one acre or more, verify that a SWPPP is onsite.

Verification that the BMPs implemented onsite are effective for the appropriate phase of

construction (preliminary stage, mass grading stage, streets and utilities stage, etc.).

Confirm compliance with the Permittee's stormwater ordinance.

Check for poorly managed authorized non-stormwater discharges or evidence of

unauthorized non-stormwater discharges that may be potential IC/IDs to a MS4.



Some Permittees have chosen to document this construction site inspection information on a separate

form, while other Permittees have chosen to incorporate this information into existing inspection

forms. An example construction site inspection form is located in Appendix L. Based on the

inspection findings, the Permittees implement follow-up actions as necessary to comply with the

requirements of the 2010 SAR MS4 Permit.

INSPECTOR TRAINING REQUIREMENTS

Provision No. XV.C requires the Permittees to provide training to staff involved in inspecting

construction sites. Permittee staff responsible for conducting construction site inspections receive

annual training regarding the following topics:

The local jurisdiction's stormwater ordinance and other applicable local jurisdiction

resolutions and codes;

The 2010 MS4 Permit;

The construction activity permits; and

The local jurisdiction's enforcement and compliance strategy/policy for construction

sites.

This annual training for construction site inspectors is conducted prior to October 1st, the start of the

rainy season. The Permittees ensure that newly-hired municipal staff or transferred municipal staff

receive formal training within six months of beginning their inspection duties. A summary of the

Permittees' efforts is provided in Table 6-1.

Table 6-1. Construction Activities


PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY 2015-2016 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT


Please provide the following metrics for assessment of the effectiveness of the Construction Activities program:

PERMITTEE

1. Percent of enforcement actions that reached each level of enforcement:

2. Number of enforcement actions that reached each level of enforcement:

3. Percent of active construction sites subject to the Construction General Permit that discovered without coverage:

4.Number of active construction sites subject to the Construction General Permit that discovered without coverage:

5. Number of illegal construction sites are discovered (i.e. without building/grading permits):

6. Number of construction inspection staff that attended formal construction training:

Beaumont

Education and information:

100%

Verbal warning: 50%

Written warning: 50%

Notice of violation or

noncompliance: 10%

Administrative compliance

order: 0%

Stop work order or cease and

desist order: 0%

Civil citation or injunction:

0%

Administrative fine: 0%

Referral to the Environmental

Crimes Strike Force for

criminal prosecution

(infraction or

misdemeanor):0%

Education and information: 4

Verbal warning: 4

Written warning: 3


noncompliance: 3


order: 0


desist order: 0

Civil citation or injunction: 0

Administrative fine: 0




(infraction or misdemeanor):

0

0% 0 0 4



Calimesa

Education and

information:100%

Verbal warning: 16%

Written warning: 0%


noncompliance: 0%


order: : 0%


desist order: 0%


0%






0%


64

Verbal warning:10

Written warning: 0


noncompliance: 0


order: 0


desist order: 0


0






0

0% 0 0 3

Canyon Lake


0%

Verbal warning: 0%

Written warning: 0%


noncompliance: 0%


order: 0%


desist order: 0%


0%


Referral to the

Environmental Crimes Strike

Force for criminal

prosecution(infraction or

misdemeanor): 0 %


Verbal warning: 0

Written warning: 0


noncompliance: 0


order: 0


desist order: 1



Referral to the

Environmental Crimes

Strike Force for criminal


misdemeanor): 0

0% 0% 1 2



Corona


100%

Verbal warning: 4%

Written warning: 0%


noncompliance: 10%


order: 0%


desist order: 0%


0%


Referral to the



prosecution (infraction or

misdemeanor):0%


56

Verbal warning: 2

Written warning: 0


noncompliance: 0


order: 0


desist order: 1



Referral to the


Force for criminal


misdemeanor): 0

0% 0 0 5

Eastvale


100%

Verbal warning: 100%

Written warning: 0%


noncompliance: 0%


order: 0%


desist order: 0%


0%


Referral to the




misdemeanor): 0 %


Verbal warning: 6

Written warning: 0


noncompliance: 0


order: 0


desist order: 0



Referral to the




misdemeanor): 0

0% 0 0 2



Hemet


0%

Verbal warning: 0%

Written warning: 0%


noncompliance: 0%


order: 0%


desist order: 0%


0%


Referral to the

Environmental


criminal


misdemeanor): 0 %


Verbal warning: 0

Written warning: 0


noncompliance: 0


order: 0


desist order: 0



Referral to the

Environmental


criminal


misdemeanor): 0

0% 0 0 2

Jurupa Valley


60%

Verbal warning: 38%

Written warning: 1%


noncompliance: 10%


order: 0%


desist order: 0%


0%


Referral to the




misdemeanor):0%


20

Verbal warning: 13

Written warning: 0


noncompliance: 1


order: 0


desist order: 0



Referral to the

Environmental


criminal


misdemeanor): 0

3 1 1 3



Lake Elsinore


0%

Verbal warning: .04%

Written warning: 1%


noncompliance: .02%


order: 0%


desist order: 0%


0%


Referral to the




misdemeanor):0%


Verbal warning: 2

Written warning: 0


noncompliance: 1


order: 0


desist order: 1



Referral to the

Environmental


criminal


misdemeanor): 0

.02% 0 1 3

Menifee


0%

Verbal warning: .6.3%

Written warning: 4.3%


noncompliance: 0%


order: 0%


desist order: 0%


0%


Referral to the


Force for criminal


misdemeanor):0%


Verbal warning: 16

Written warning: 11


noncompliance: 0


order: 0


desist order: 1



Referral to the

Environmental

0%Crimes Strike Force for

criminal


misdemeanor): 0

0% 0 0 5



Moreno

Valley


0%

Verbal warning: .0%

Written warning: 0%


noncompliance: 0%


order: 0%


desist order: 0%


0%


Referral to the




misdemeanor) 0%


Verbal warning: 0

Written warning: 0


noncompliance: 0


order: 0


desist order: 0



Referral to the

Environmental 0%


criminal


misdemeanor): 0

0% 0 0 2

Norco


N/A

Verbal warning: N/A

Written warning: N/A %


noncompliance: N/A


order: N/A


desist order: N/A


N/A

Administrative fine: N/A




(infraction or misdemeanor)

N/A


N/A

Verbal warning: N/A

Written warning: N/A


noncompliance: N/A


order: N/A


desist order: N/A


N/A


Referral to the

Environmental


criminal


misdemeanor): N/A

0% 0 0 1



Perris


%

Verbal warning: .%



noncompliance: %


order: %


desist order: %


%

Administrative fine: %





%


Verbal warning: 5

Written warning:


noncompliance:


order:


desist order:


Administrative fine:

Referral to the

Environmental


criminal


misdemeanor):

0% 0 0 1

Riverside


100%

Verbal warning: 19%



noncompliance: 0%


order: 0%


desist order: 0%


0%





(infraction or

misdemeanor):0%


359

Verbal warning: 68

Written warning: 37


noncompliance: 0


order: 0


desist order: 0



Referral to the


Force for criminal


misdemeanor):0

0% 0 0 13



Riverside

County


100%




noncompliance: 5%


order: 0%


desist order: 0%


0%





(infraction or

misdemeanor):0%


151

Verbal warning: 15

Written warning: 128


noncompliance: 8


order: 0


desist order: 1



Referral to the


Force for criminal


misdemeanor): 0

0.5% 0 5

14-Transportation

17-Building &

Safety

RCFC&WCD


N/A

Verbal warning: N/A



noncompliance: N/A


order: N/A


desist order: N/A


N/A






N/A


N/A

Verbal warning: N/A



noncompliance: N/A


order: N/A


desist order: N/A


N/A


Referral to the


Force for criminal


misdemeanor): N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A



San Jacinto


0%

Verbal warning: 0%

Written warning: 0%


noncompliance: 0%


order: 0%


desist order: 0%


0%





(infraction or

misdemeanor):0%


Verbal warning: 0

Written warning: 0


noncompliance: 0


order: 0


desist order: 0



Referral to the


Force for criminal


misdemeanor): 0

0% 0 0 1



PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY 2015-2016 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT


Provision No. XI.A.1 of the Permit requires each Co-Permittee to maintain and update a database inventory of all active Construction Sites.

Provision No. XI.A.2 of Permit requires submittal of this database with each Annual Report.

PERMITTEE Please provide an electronic copy of database inventory of all active Construction Sites within your Permittee's jurisdiction.

Beaumont Construction Site database inventory is provided.

Calimesa See exhibit "E" as reference.

Canyon Lake In September 2015 illegal grading at 30891 Blackhorse caused runoff of silt, soil and debris. The property owner continued work after a "STOP

WORK ORDER" was issued. The City of Canyon Lake responded several times before requesting assistance of Regional Water Quality Control

Board representative, Michael Roth. Citations were issued and a grading permit was issued.

Corona SEE ATTACHMENT 'B'

Eastvale See Attachment D

Hemet SEE ATTACHMENT C

Jurupa Valley The database is provided herein.

Lake Elsinore EXHIBIT V

Menifee

Attachment D – Construction Site Inventory_2015-16AR provides an inventory of all active construction sites within the City. The City

completed 258 inspections of construction sites during 2015-16 and exceeded the Permit-required inspection frequencies at many sites to ensure

compliance. For example, several Medium priority sites were inspected monthly and several Low priority sites were inspected more than once

during the wet season.

Moreno Valley See Attachment C

Norco The City is currently looking into various options to move the current permit tracking system into an electronic based system that meets all of

the demands and requirements of the City, including various other departments.

Perris Please see attached Exhibit 10 for a hardcopy of the database for construction sites.

Riverside See Attached Documents

Riverside

County

Refer to document titled "Santa Ana River Watershed Reportable Sites Attachment C" for an inventory of all Active Municipal Construction

Sites. Also, please see the database attached titled "Construction Site Inspections" for the inventory of all Active Private Development

Construction Sites.

RCFC&WCD The District maintains an electronic database of active District-owned construction sites. However, the District does not issue grading or building

permits for private construction activity. The District does, however, utilize the SWRCB's SMARTS system for those projects that are deemed

applicable

San Jacinto Not available.


PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION Section 7 – Industrial and Commercial Sources Page 7-1

7. INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL SOURCES

The Permittees' initial industrial and commercial sources program element was initially described

in the Enforcement/Compliance Strategy as required by the 1996 MS4 Permit and was revised to

address the requirements of the 2002 MS4 Permit. This included an expansion of the commercial

businesses covered by the inspection program, required inventories/databases, prioritization of

industrial and commercial sources relative to the potential to impact water quality, and specified

inspection frequencies based upon facility priority. The Industrial and Commercial Sources

Program will continue to have both regional and local jurisdiction components.

In July 2011, Section 8 of the DAMP – Industrial and Commercial Sources, was revised to reflect

the requirements of the 2010 MS4 Permit and was submitted to the SARWQCB. On December

31, 2014, the County Department of Environmental Health eliminated the CAP and inspection

support. In August 2015, Section 8 of the DAMP was updated to include the elimination of the

CAP. The DAMP, included in Appendix M, includes the removal of the CAP program.

CURRENT INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL FACILITY INSPECTIONS

The Permittees have developed a mechanism to identify compliance of industrial and commercial

facilities with local stormwater ordinances and, where applicable, potential non-compliance with

California's General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities.

Two main components of this existing program are the Permittees industrial and commercial

facility inspections, which replaced the CAP, and the local POTW pre-treatment inspection

programs.

COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (CAP)/ PERMITTEES INDUSTRIAL AND

COMMERCIAL FACILITY INSPECTION

Until December 31, 2014, the County implemented the CAP for oversight and inspection of

industrial and commercial sources. The Permittees began to implement measures to ensure the

industrial and commercial facility inspections are conducted according to the MS4 Permit soon

after the termination of CAP. The inspections are performed by the Permittees, at frequencies

mentioned in Provision No. XI.D.

The CAP/Permittees industrial and commercial facility inspection involved a detailed stormwater

compliance survey for:

Facilities that must secure a hazardous materials permit for storing, handling, or

generating such materials; and

Retail food facilities.



The CAP/Permittees' industrial and commercial facility inspection includes educational outreach

to the inspected facilities and completion of a detailed stormwater compliance survey. Completed

survey forms are included into the respective municipality's database. The completed survey forms

are prioritized and the respective municipality's representative identifies those surveys that indicate

non-compliance to initiate a follow-up inspection. In conducting a facility inspection, if it appears

that the facility may be required to have coverage under the General Permit for Storm Water

Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities and the facility operator indicated that a Notice

of Intent (NOI) has not been filed, the inspector provides the facility operator with an informational

sheet on the requirements of the General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with

Industrial Activities.

Blank copies of the forms used by the Permittees when conducting these stormwater compliance

surveys are included in Appendix L. The 2010 MS4 Permit requires the Permittees to ensure that

the stormwater compliance surveys of restaurants conducted as part of the CAP address, at

minimum:

Oil and grease disposal to verify that these wastes are not poured onto parking lots,

streets, or adjacent catch basins;

Trash bin areas to verify that these areas are clean, the bin lids are closed, the bins are

not used for liquid waste disposal, and wash water from the bins is not disposed into

the MS4;

Parking lot, alley, sidewalk and street areas to verify that floor mats, filters and garbage

containers are not washed in those areas and that no wash water is disposed of in those

areas;

Parking lot areas to verify that they are cleaned by sweeping, not by hosing down, and

that the facility operator uses dry methods for spill cleanup; and

Violations of the stormwater ordinance are enforced by the Permittee.

These specific topics are addressed in questions 1-8 of the Food Facility Stormwater Compliance

Survey Form included in Appendix L.

INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL FACILITY DATABASE

Provision No. XI.A.1 of the MS4 Permit requires each Permittee to continue to update its industrial

and commercial facilities database, including facility information priority and inspection

information. The database content may be Permittee specific, but contains minimum information

that must be provided.



Provision No. XI.A.2 requires a summary of the number of industrial and commercial facilities

compliance surveys/inspections and the actions taken. A template spreadsheet was developed by

the Permittees and is included in Appendix L.

Provision Nos. XI.C.1 and XI.D.3 requires each agency to prioritize and inspect all inventoried

industrial and commercial facilities.

Provision No. XI. requires each Permittee to develop an inventory of the following commercial

facilities/companies within its jurisdiction:

Mobile automobile or other vehicle washing/detailing (base of operations);

Mobile carpet, drape or furniture cleaning (base of operations);

Mobile high pressure or steam cleaning (base of operations);

Mobile equipment washing/cleaning (base of operations);

Nurseries and greenhouses;

Landscape and hardscape installation (base of operations);

Other commercial facilities that the Permittee determines may contribute a significant

pollutant load to the MS4;

Facilities that transport, store, or transfer pre-production plastic pellets;

Managed turf facilities (e.g., private golf courses, athletic fields, cemeteries, and

private parks); and

Industrial facilities defined in Attachment 1 of the Industrial General Permit.

Permittee databases are included with the respective Permittee submittal section of this report

under Appendix J – Permittee Reports.

INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS

Provision No. XI.C.1 requires each agency's industrial facility compliance surveys and inspections

to address the following items:

Verification of the type (or types) of industrial and/or commercial activities and facility

Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes;

Submittal of an NOI to comply with the General Industrial Permit, if applicable based

upon the facility's SIC code;

Compliance with the Permittee's stormwater ordinance;

Observation for non-stormwater discharges, potential IC/IDs to the MS4;

Potential discharge of pollutants in urban runoff from areas of material storage, vehicle

or equipment fueling, or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling,

hazardous materials handling or storage, delivery areas or loading docks, or other

outdoor work areas;

Implementation and maintenance of appropriate or minimum BMPs;



Qualitative assessment of the effectiveness of the BMPs implemented; and

Education regarding stormwater pollution prevention.

The Permittees developed a template form to use during follow up site inspections. This form is

included in Appendix L. A summary of the Permittees' efforts is provided in Table 7-1.

INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL FACILITY INSPECTOR TRAINING

Provision No. XV.C of the 2010 MS4 Permit requires each Permittee to provide training to staff

involved in conducting industrial facilities compliance surveys/inspections.

Permittee staff responsible for conducting inspections, as part of the Permittee Industrial and

Commercial Inspection Program or a wastewater pretreatment inspection program, receive annual

training regarding the following topics:

Selection, implementation, and maintenance of appropriate or minimum BMPs for

industrial or commercial facilities;

The Industrial General Permit and NOI requirements;

The Permittee's stormwater ordinance and other local jurisdiction resolutions and codes

related to protection of water quality;

The 2010 MS4 Permit, the DAMP, and the LIP;

The local jurisdiction's enforcement and compliance strategy/policy for industrial and

commercial facilities;

How to provide guidance to industrial and commercial facility operators on proper

selection, implementation and maintenance of BMPs, and compliance with the

requirements of the stormwater ordinance during site inspections; and

TMDL requirements and appropriate BMPs to mitigate the impacts of industrial and

commercial facilities.

The Permittees ensure that newly hired municipal staff or transferred municipal staff receives

informal training within six months of hire and formal training within one year of hire. When

planning formal classroom training related to conducting inspections of industrial or commercial

facilities, the Permittees will notify, and coordinate with, SARWQCB staff.

Permittee staff responsible for conducting industrial or commercial facility inspections may also

attend training sponsored by professional associations such as the American Society of Civil

Engineers, American Public Works Association, the CASQA, and other area-wide MS4 Permittees

and entities.

Table 7-1 Industrial and Commercial Sources

Program Implementation Section 7 – Industrial and Commercial Sources Page 7-5

INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL SOURCES 2015-2016 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT


Please provide the following metrics for assessment of the effectiveness of the Industrial/Commercial Facilities program:

PERMITTEE

1. Percent of enforcement actions that reached each level of enforcement:

2. Number of enforcement actions that reached each level of enforcement:

3. Percent of Industrial Facilities subject to the Industrial General Permit that are discovered without coverage:

4. Number of active Industrial Facilities subject to the Industrial General Permit that are discovered without coverage:

5. Number of new/undocumented Industrial/Commercial facilities added to database:

6. Number of applicable Industrial/Commercial facility inspection staff that attended formal Industrial/Commercial training:

Beaumont

Education and

information: 50%

Verbal warning: 50%



noncompliance: 0%

Administrative

compliance order: 0%

Stop work order or cease

and desist order: 0%

Civil citation or

injunction: 0%


Referral to the




misdemeanor): 0%

Education and

information: 3

Verbal warning: 4

Written warning: 0


noncompliance: 0

Administrative

compliance order: 0


and desist order: 0

Civil citation or

injunction: 0


Referral to the




misdemeanor): 0

0% 0 0 1



Calimesa

Education and

information: 0%

Verbal warning: 0%

Written warning: 0%


noncompliance: 0%

Administrative

compliance order: 0_%



Civil citation or

injunction: 0%


Referral to the




misdemeanor): 0%

Education and

information: 0

Verbal warning: 0

Written warning: 0


noncompliance: 0

Administrative

compliance order: 0


and desist order: 0

Civil citation or

injunction: 0


Referral to the




misdemeanor): 0

0% 0 0 3

Canyon Lake

Education and

information: 7%

Verbal warning: 0%

Written warning: 0%


noncompliance: 0%

Administrative




Civil citation or

injunction: 0%


Referral to the




misdemeanor): 0%

Education and

information: 0

Verbal warning: 0

Written warning: 0


noncompliance: 0

Administrative

compliance order: 0


and desist order: 0

Civil citation or

injunction: 0


Referral to the




misdemeanor): 0

0% 0 0 3



Corona

Education and

information: 100%

Verbal warning: 4%

Written warning: 0%


noncompliance: 0.11%

Administrative




Civil citation or

injunction: 0%


Referral to the



prosecution (infraction

or misdemeanor): 0%

Education and

information: 856

Verbal warning: 33

Written warning: 0


noncompliance: 1

Administrative

compliance order: 0


and desist order: 0

Civil citation or

injunction: 0


Referral to the




misdemeanor): 0

0% 0 110 2

Eastvale

Education and

information: 100%




noncompliance: 0%

Administrative




Civil citation or

injunction: 0%


Referral to the




or misdemeanor): 0%

Education and

information: 7

Verbal warning: 7

Written warning: 1


noncompliance: 0

Administrative

compliance order: 0


and desist order: 0

Civil citation or

injunction: 0


Referral to the




misdemeanor): 0

89.5% 17 5 2



Hemet

Education and

information: 0%

Verbal warning: 0%

Written warning: 0%


noncompliance: 0%

Administrative




Civil citation or

injunction: 0%


Referral to the




misdemeanor): 0 %

Education and

information: 0

Verbal warning: 0

Written warning: 0


noncompliance: 0

Administrative

compliance order: 0


and desist order: 0

Civil citation or

injunction: 0


Referral to the




misdemeanor): 0

0% 0 0 0

Jurupa Valley

Education and

information: 13%

Verbal warning: 30%

Written warning: 0%


noncompliance: 0.3%

Administrative

compliance order: N/A


and desist order: N/A

Civil citation or

injunction: N/A

Administrative fine:N/A

Referral to the




misdemeanor): N/A

Education and

information: 150

Verbal warning: 350



noncompliance: 4

Administrative




Civil citation or

injunction: N/A


Referral to the




misdemeanor): N/A

3% 30 22 4



Lake Elsinore

Education and

information: 92%

Verbal warning: 11%

Written warning: 2%


noncompliance: 0%

Administrative




Civil citation or

injunction: 0%


Referral to the




misdemeanor): 0%

Education and

information: 122

Verbal warning: 13

Written warning: 0


noncompliance: 2

Administrative

compliance order: 0


and desist order: 0

Civil citation or

injunction: 0


Referral to the




misdemeanor): N/A

56% 15 628 3

Menifee

Education and

information: %

Verbal warning: 41.2%



noncompliance: 0%

Administrative




Civil citation or

injunction: 0%


Referral to the




or misdemeanor): 0%

Education and

information:

Verbal warning: 47

Written warning: 47


noncompliance: 0

Administrative

compliance order: 0


and desist order: 0

Civil citation or

injunction: 0


Referral to the




misdemeanor): 0

7% 8 0 4



Moreno Valley

Education and

information:49%

Verbal warning: 0%

Written warning: 0%


noncompliance: 0%

Administrative




Civil citation or

injunction: 0%


Referral to the




misdemeanor): 0%

Education and

information: 0

Verbal warning: 0

Written warning: 0


noncompliance: 0

Administrative

compliance order: 0


and desist order: 0

Civil citation or

injunction: 0


Referral to the




misdemeanor): 0

35% 14 9 2

Norco

Education and

information:0%

Verbal warning:100%

Written warning: 0%


noncompliance: 0%

Administrative




Civil citation or

injunction: 0%


Referral to the




misdemeanor): 0%

Education and

information: 0

Verbal warning: 2

Written warning: 0


noncompliance: 0

Administrative

compliance order: 0


and desist order: 0

Civil citation or

injunction: 0


Referral to the




misdemeanor): 0

0% 0 0 0



Perris

Education and

information:%

Verbal warning:%



noncompliance: %

Administrative

compliance order: %


and desist order: %

Civil citation or

injunction: %


Referral to the




misdemeanor): %

Education and

information:

Verbal warning:

Written warning: 4


noncompliance: 4

Administrative

compliance order:


and desist order:

Civil citation or

injunction:

Administrative fine:

Referral to the




misdemeanor):

0% 0 0 1

Riverside

Education and

information: 25.9%


Written warning: 0%


noncompliance: 0%

Administrative




Civil citation or

injunction: 0%


Referral to the




misdemeanor): 0%

Education and

information:1,853

Verbal warning: 480

Written warning: 52


noncompliance: 0

Administrative

compliance order:0


and desist order: 0

Civil citation or

injunction:0


Referral to the




misdemeanor):

0% 0 0 0



Riverside County

Education and

information: 100%

Verbal warning: 1%



noncompliance: 3%

Administrative




Civil citation or

injunction: 0%


Referral to the




misdemeanor): 0%

Education and

information: 25

Verbal warning: 1

Written warning: 25


noncompliance: 14

Administrative

compliance order: 0


and desist order: 0

Civil citation or

injunction: 0


Referral to the




misdemeanor): 0

.1% 2 3

6-Transportation

51-Code

Enforcement

11-Building &

Safety

RCFC&WCD

Education and

information: N/A

Verbal warning: N/A



noncompliance: N/A

Administrative




Civil citation or

injunction: N/A


Referral to the




misdemeanor): N/A

Education and

information: N/A

Verbal warning: N/A



noncompliance: N/A

Administrative




Civil citation or

injunction: 0


Referral to the




misdemeanor): N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A



San Jacinto

Education and

information: 20%

Verbal warning: 0%

Written warning: 0%


noncompliance: 10%

Administrative




Civil citation or

injunction: 0%


Referral to the




misdemeanor): 0%

Education and

information: 15

Verbal warning: 0

Written warning: 0


noncompliance: 5

Administrative

compliance order: 0


and desist order: 0

Civil citation or

injunction: 0


Referral to the




misdemeanor): 0

0% 0 0 0





Provision No. XI.A.1 of the Permit requires each Permittee to maintain and update a database inventory of all Industrial/Commercial Sites. Provision No.

XI.A.2 of the Permit requires submittal of this database with each Annual Report.

Please provide an electronic copy of the database inventory of all Industrial and Commercial Sites within your Permittee's jurisdiction.

Beaumont Industrial and Commercial Sites database inventory is provided.

Calimesa See exhibit "F" as reference

Canyon Lake SEE ATTACHMENT #9 for Industrial and Commercial Inspection Report

Corona SEE ATTACHMENT 'C'

Eastvale Attachment (E) Industrial/Commercial Inspection Database

Hemet SEE ATTACHMENT D


Lake Elsinore EXHIBIT AA

Menifee Attachment E – Industrial Commercial Facility Inventory_2015-16AR provides an inventory of all industrial and commercial

businesses within the City.

Moreno Valley See Attachment D.

Norco

The City has two businesses that fall within the industrial classification.

E-Z UP instant shelters, 1900 Second Street Norco CA 92860

QCP, 731 Parkridge Avenue, Norco CA 92860

Perris Please see attached Exhibit 11 for a hardcopy of the database inventory of all Industrial and Commercial Sites.

Riverside See Attached Documents

Riverside County Please see attached database titled "Commercial Industrial Inspections".

RCFC&WCD N/A

San Jacinto See attached.





Provision No. XI.A.13 of the Permit requires each Permittee to monitor and annually evaluate and report adequacy of program coverage and

enforcement response in complying with the Order where required inspections and/or enforcement is carried out on behalf of the Permittee by other

agencies or departments, such as the County Department of Environmental Health, county and local fire departments, hazardous materials programs,

code enforcement, industrial pretreatment, and building and safety.

PERMITTEE Please provide a report on the adequacy of program coverage and enforcement response in complying with the Order where required

inspections and/or enforcement is carried out on behalf of the Permittee by other agency departments.

Beaumont

The CAP previously conducted by the Riverside County was suspended in December 2014; therefore all such inspections are to be performed

by the City staff or through its consultants. Many such inspections of auto repair, gas stations and restaurants were conducted a summary of

which is enclosed as an appendix with this report. As previously mentioned, the City experience departmental turnover across the all City

departments during the 2015-2016 fiscal year. During that time, program coverage was inadequate for the City. Consultants provided

enforcement during the tumultuous period, and consultant records are currently being obtained by the City. The City intends to accelerate

the inspection of these facilities consistent with its LIP currently in effect.

Calimesa

Our City Code Enforcement and Public Works Department are alert and proactive as well as Citizens Patrol with constantly looking out for

any hazardous and/or environmental violations, which could impact the State, County and City water ways. The Public Works Director takes

immediate action with regards to any emergency and/or violations that may happen or exist and will, if required, contact the appropriate

agencies i.e. County, State, and Federal agencies and will seek and ensure appropriate enforcement actions.

Canyon Lake For fiscal year 2015/2016, the City of Canyon Lake had no inspections performed by Riverside County Department of Environmental health.

Corona

City's NPDES staff takes the lead on enforcement issues related to our stormwater ordinance when referrals are made from other agencies

such as County Department of Environmental Health, County Hazmat, and the Regional Board. NPDES staff also responds to referrals made

from various City departments such as fire department, code enforcement, and building and safety regarding potential violations at industrial

and commercial facilities. Once notification is received by NPDES staff, we typically follow up on all potential violations within two

working days to ensure proper enforcement is taken per our ordinance and as described in the LIP. In instances when a potential violation

is referred to us but that facility is not in our jurisdiction, we ensure the proper agency is notified and send notification via e-mail to the

appropriate Permittee contact.

Eastvale

The City of Eastvale works closely with the County department of Environmental Health, fire departments, code enforcement, and building

and safety. Once an issue is found, the responsible parties will be notified for follow up. The City has reviewed the program coverage and it

was determined to be adequate. The City is currently working on adding stronger enforcement policies for our Industrial/Commercial Facility

Stormwater Program that should be ready within the 2016/2017 Fiscal Year.

Hemet

The City of Hemet recently finalized an agreement with CASC Consulting and Engineering to provide permit-required stormwater program

inspections for applicable commercial and industrial facilities in the City of Hemet. CASC will begin conducting inspections on behalf of

the City of Hemet in September 2016.

Jurupa Valley Our police and fire are County services as well as Environmental Health. We enforce the provisions we are responsible for. We also have

interdepartmental cooperation with our Building and Code Enforcement Divisions assisting anyway they can.



Lake Elsinore For FY 15/16, there were no instances of inspections of Commercial/Industrial facilities within the City's jurisdictional limits were carried

out by other agencies.

Menifee

The City assumed full responsibility for the Industrial and Commercial Storm Water Inspection Program in 2014-15 and completed 113 full

and partial storm water inspections at select facilities this 2015-16 fiscal year. Storm water inspections conducted by the City resulted in a

total of 46 cases that were recommended for follow-up. The majority of these cases were due to improper implementation of BMPs; only

seven cases were due to observed IC/IDs. The City is actively working with the remaining nine businesses that are still considered out of

compliance based on the most recent June 2016 inspection to address the necessary deficiencies.

Moreno Valley

The City has contracted with an environmental consulting firm to conduct the commercial and industrial inspections as per the Order's

compliance schedule. A representative from this firm is available to follow-up until compliance is reached. Code Enforcement also can be

notified if legal action is necessary.

Norco -

Perris

The City of Perris maintains a record of all enforcement actions taken against those suspected of violating the City's Stormwater Management

and Discharge Controls Ordinance, and continues to issue a variety of correction notices up to and including court citation for misdemeanor

violations. The CAP Program, intended to assist co-permittees with their individual Industrial/Commercial Inspection Program came to an

end in December, 2014. As such, during the previous reporting period 2014-2015 the City requested and received proposals from Private

inspection companies to begin conducting Commercial and Industrial Inspections on behalf of the City. During that reporting period, on or

about September 8, 2015 the City entered into an Agreement with the Consulting Firm, and prioritized the first set of "High" and "Medium"

and "Low" Commercial and Industrial business to be inspected under the City's new Inspection Program, using the old methodology as

described in the City's Current LIP. During the current reporting period 2015-2016, the first year inspection program went exceedingly well,

all the entire list of Low, Medium and High commercial and industrial business were inspected, approximately 113 businesses were

inspected. Based on the first year inspections the original list was reprioritized based on the actual visit and in accordance with the

methodology and the new requirements found under Section XI of the new NPDES Permit. It is important to note that the first year's list

included all High and all medium business on the City's entire list of commercial and industrial businesses, but did not include all "Low"

priority businesses. The City's entire list of Commercial and Industrial Business is 318, including all High, Medium and Low categories.

"Low" business are only required to be inspected once every five years. Therefore, certain 'Low" business are still categorized under the old

prioritization methodology. These remaining "Low" business will be systematically inspected over the remaining permit term. As the

remaining "Low" business are inspected, they will receive a new rating in accordance with the new methodology required by the new NPDES

Permit. As indicated above, the City of Perris has reviewed the LIP against the new requirements found under Section XI of the new NPDES

Permit, and in light of the end of the CAP Program, and the new City Inspection Program the City has determined that changes should be

made to the City's Inspection Program prioritization methodology, as detailed in the City's Current LIP. These changes will be incorporated

into the City's LIP, and revisions will be provided to the Board during the next NPDES reporting Period.

Riverside

In FY 2015-2016 the City's Environmental Compliance Section conducted 1,853 stormwater inspections at a variety of businesses. Each

business includes a review of the facility, housekeeping or their BMP's, and a general review of stormwater principles. Depending on the

outcome of the inspection, appropriate action was taken to ensure the businesses complied with all City ordinances pertaining to stormwater.

A detailed database is maintained and contains information about each facility. See attached documents for more information.

Riverside County N/A



RCFC&WCD The District has one staff person dedicated to IC/ID inspections. The District does not perform industrial/commercial inspections of private

facilities.

San Jacinto

As a result of the discontinuance of the CAP program in December 2014, the City contracted with a third party consultant to conduct required

inspections. The City's inspection list was reviewed and High and Medium Priority Commercial and Industrial facilities were inspected

between May 1, 2016 and June 30, 2016. A total of 47 commercial/industrial businesses were inspected during this period.



INDUSTRIAL ANDCOMMERCIAL SOURCES 2015-2016 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT


Provision No. XI.D.6 of the Permit requires each Permittee to notify all mobile businesses based or operating within their jurisdiction

concerning the minimum Source Control and Pollution Prevention BMPs that they must develop and implement.

PERMITTEE 1. Please describe the efforts made to provide these notifications:

Beaumont

Outreach brochures provided at the Civic Center counter by City staff. The City has been very active in providing outreach to its various

customer categories namely, industrial, commercial and residential. Various outreach brochures have been prepared which are routinely

handed out by city staff managing customer service counters. Number of brochures that are desighended to educate residential, commercial

and industrial customers are included as an appendix to this report. These brochures would be revised as necessary. For example various

groups hold fund raising events such as car wash by boy scouts, schools , girl scouts etc; where there is a potential of nutrient containing

wastewater to enter the city storm water system that eventually discharges into US waters. One of the outreach brochures recommends that

such groups work with local car washes and share the revenue by utilizing these facilities rather than do individually such events throughout

the City. This program is still in its infancy and would require more education at the grass root level such as from elementary to high schools.

It is recommended that city participate in attending educational events at schools and also distribute outreach brochures during scheduled

events such as Cherry Festivals and summer music concerts series that is sponsored by the City.

Calimesa

The City of Calimesa has developed and implemented BMPs and minimum source controls for all new and existing mobile businesses that

are operating within the City. The City has placed all existing mobile businesses on notice and all new applicants receive BMP handouts at

time of submittal of business license application.

Canyon Lake

Chapter 5 of the Canyon Lake Municipal Code requires that all businesses doing business within the City must obtain a business license with

the City. The business license application requires businesses involving NPDES compliance to identify such on the application before any

licenses are approved. Information on compliance with NPDES is sent to all businesses that have noted this on their application. Mobile

Detailers are required to acknowledge specific guidelines of the City Municipal Code and are also required to sign a form that indicates they

are aware of the NPDES rules and regulations.



Corona

1) NPDES staff adds new businesses to our industrial/commercial facilities database on a quarterly basis. This list of businesses is obtained

from City business license applications. As businesses are added, they are categorized into a HIGH, MEDIUM, or LOW priority based on

their SIC and those businesses identified as mobile businesses with their base of operations in City are flagged in the database. Mobile

businesses are assigned a HIGH priority initially and therefore will be inspected within one year of being added to the database. NPDES

inspection staff visits these facilities and provide the owners with educational materials developed by the City specifically for mobile operators

regarding the minimum BMPs that are required to be implemented. Staff discusses expectations to use these BMPs when operating in Corona

and anywhere in Riverside County.

2) NPDES staff responds to complaints of mobile business operators discharging or potentially discharging non-stormwater into the MS4.

The operators are provided the mobile business educational materials and are informed of the minimum BMPs to operate in City of Corona.

If a business license has not been issued or if adequate BMPs cannot be implemented, the operators are told to immediately cease operations.

3) Within this permit term, NPDES staff has proactively performed after-hour reconnaissance at commercial districts throughout the City

to identify mobile operators in action and educate those that were found to be out of compliance. The same educational materials are provided

and operators are informed of the minimum BMPs to operate in the City. Staff have identified businesses that regularly clean trash enclosures

and parking lot areas as more likely to operate late in the evening or early in the morning, therefore not within normal agency operating hours.

Eastvale The City of Eastvale provides public education information to mobile businesses during the business registration process. The city also actively

sends out compliance notifications to existing mobile businesses as they are discovered to be working within the city.

Hemet

The City of Hemet has identified mobile businesses based within, or operating within our jurisdiction by the following methods:

Internet search

City of Hemet business license database

Discovery of businesses operating within jurisdiction

Identified mobile businesses are provided with a copy of the City of Hemet Guidelines for Mobile Washing Businesses.

Jurupa Valley

The City has a list of all registered business in the City and has continued to work on their mobile business program. . Letters were sent out

to the mobile business regarding the required stormwater compliance inspection. During the 2015-2016 fiscal year, the City made a large

effort to remove home businesses that did not require an inspection for stormwater compliance. These home businesses showed no sign of

active outdoor activity or waste disposal related to their work. Mobile business that completed regular work at certain facilities were inspected

to ensure they complied with the stromwater requirements. While inspectors complete inspection, they would monitor for mobile businesses

actively working in the City's jurisdiction. If mobile business are found, the inspector verifies the business has a business registration to

complete work in the city. Then explain the stormwater compliance requirements for the mobile business. Mobile business found operating

in the city without a business registration are sent to code enforcement.

Lake Elsinore

The City compiled a list of mobile businesses in the area using the City Business License Database, Internet and Local "Penny Saver". The

mobile businesses identified were then sent a letter advising them of the requirement to implement BMPs and educating them on stormwater

pollution prevention. See Appendix 1

Menifee All mobile businesses currently operating in the City of Menifee receive storm water educational materials on the required source control and

pollution prevention BMPs during the business registration/renewal process.



Moreno Valley

During previous reporting periods, the City of Moreno Valley utilized known business license information in order to identify all mobile

businesses that were based or operating within its jurisdiction, and whose business practices were found to be potentially harmful to water

quality. These Mobile Washing/Cleaning businesses were notified by letter, which included both education materials in both English and

Spanish, explaining the minimum Source Control and Pollution Prevention BMPs that were appropriate for their type of operations.

Businesses were also notified of the City's requirement to routinely inspect their operations in order to verify compliance with local and

regional water quality requirements as well as determine if appropriate BMPs were being implemented. This effort will be duplicated during

the following reporting period.

Norco Educational materials are available at City Hall for businesses.

Perris

On May 4, 2012 the Co-Permittees modified DAMP Section 8 to describe more specific processes and procedures for regulating mobile

businesses. The City reviewed the requirements of Section 8, as well as the BMP's developed by the Co-Permittees for Mobile businesses,

and more fully described its enforcement strategy in the City's new Individual LIP. The City's LIP more fully describes the City's procedures

for regulating and enforcing mobile businesses. The City continues to review its current limited public outreach program, consisting of

Channel 3 announcements, storm drain stencils, and handouts at public counters and events to determine if the mobile business notification

program must be modified to comply with the permit requirements.

Riverside

The City administers a mobile business program whereby new mobile washers come to the Riverside Regional Water Quality Control Plant

(RWQCP) to demonstrate their process and recovery methods. In FY 2015-2016, 11 mobile washing businesses came to RWQCP to

demonstrate their process. In addition, city staff inspected 20 mobile wash companies over the fiscal year to educate them about stormwater

BMP's.

Riverside

County

The Transportation, Building and Safety and Code Enforcement Departments distribute NPDES compliance literature specific for mobile

business owners and operators.

RCFC&WCD N/A

San Jacinto City routinely reviews business license list on monthly basis and makes effort to communicate with those businesses that may be home based

or mobile. Educational materials are provided as appropriate.

RESIDENTIAL

Program Implementation Section 8 – Residential Page 8-1

8. RESIDENTIAL

Per Permit Provision XI.E, the Co-Permittees have developed and implemented their residential

program consistent with the requirements of the Permit to help reduce the discharge of pollutants

from residential activities to the MS4, consistent with the MEP standard. The tables below include

documentation of the evaluation of their individual residential program.

Table 8-1. Residential


RESIDENTIAL 2015-2016 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT

Santa Ana Region NPDES Municipal Stormwater Permit

PERMITTEE

Please provide the following metrics for assessment of the effectiveness of the Residential program:

1. Gallons of

used oil

collected at

collection

events:

2. Total

pounds

collected at

HHW/ABOP

events:

3. Total

number of

participants at

HHW/ABOP

events:

4. Percent of enforcement actions


enforcement:

5. Number of enforcement actions


enforcement:

Beaumont 304 32,572 352

Education and information: 0%

Verbal warning: 0%

Written warning: 0%


noncompliance: 0%

Administrative compliance order:

0%

Stop work order or cease and desist

order: 0%

Civil citation or injunction: 0%


Referral to the Environmental Crimes

Strike Force for criminal prosecution

(infraction or misdemeanor): 0%


Verbal warning: 0

Written warning: 0

Notice of violation or noncompliance: 0

Administrative compliance order: 0


order: 0





(infraction or misdemeanor): 0

Calimesa 0 0 N/A


Verbal warning: 0%

Written warning: 0%


noncompliance: 0%


0%


order: 0%




Crimes Strike Force for criminal


misdemeanor): 0%


Verbal warning: 0

Written warning: 0

Notice of violation or noncompliance:

0



order: 0

Civil citation or injunction: : 0

Administrative fine: : 0



(infraction or misdemeanor): : 0



Canyon Lake 0 0 0


Verbal warning: 27%

Written warning:25%


noncompliance: 0%


0%


order: 0%






misdemeanor): 0%


Verbal warning: 6

Written warning: 6




order: 2






Corona 7,438 124,530 1,455


Verbal warning: 35%

Written warning:0%


noncompliance: 8%


0%


desist order: 0%


Administrative fine: 0% Referral to the Environmental



misdemeanor): 0%


Verbal warning: 18

Written warning: 0


noncompliance: 4



order: 0






misdemeanor): : 0



Eastvale N/A N/A N/A



Written warning:0%


noncompliance: 0%


0%


order: 0%






misdemeanor): 0%

Education and information:3

Verbal warning: 3

Written warning: 0




order: 0






Hemet N/A N/A N/A



Written warning:100%


noncompliance: 0%


0%


order: 0%






misdemeanor): 0%


Verbal warning: 0

Written warning: 1




order: 0








Jurupa Valley 0 0 0


Verbal warning: 0%

Written warning: 0%


noncompliance: 0%


0%


order: 0%






misdemeanor): 0%


Verbal warning: 0

Written warning: 0




order: 0






Lake Elsinore 2507 See Appendix

2 See Appendix 2


Verbal warning: 0%

Written warning: 0%


noncompliance: 0%


0%


order: 0%






misdemeanor): 0%


Verbal warning: 4

Written warning: 4




order: 0








Menifee Prinicipal

Permittee

Prinicipal

Permittee

Prinicipal

Permittee

Education and information: 33.3%




noncompliance: 16.7%


0%


order: 16.7%






misdemeanor): 0%


Verbal warning: 2

Written warning: 2




order: 1






Moreno Valley - 82,435 -


Verbal warning: 0%

Written warning: 0%


noncompliance: 36%


6%


order: 0%






misdemeanor): 0%


Verbal warning: 0

Written warning: 0


41



order: 0








Norco N/A N/A N/A

Education and information: %

Verbal warning: %



noncompliance: %

Administrative compliance order: %


order: %

Civil citation or injunction: %





misdemeanor): %


Verbal warning:

Written warning: 2




order:

Civil citation or injunction: :

Administrative fine: :




Perris 250 479.86 tons 680

Education and information: %

Verbal warning:14 %



noncompliance: %

Administrative compliance order: %


order: %

Civil citation or injunction: %





misdemeanor): %


Verbal warning: 1

Written warning:

Notice of violation or noncompliance:6



order:

Civil citation or injunction: :

Administrative fine: :






Riverside 1272 434 2,487


Verbal warning: 91%

Written warning:51%


noncompliance: 5%


0%


order: 0%






misdemeanor): 0%


Verbal warning: 16

Written warning: 86

Notice of violation or noncompliance:8



order: 0





(infraction or misdemeanor):0

Riverside County 1,795 24,341 373


Verbal warning: 1%

Written warning:94%


noncompliance: 5%


0%


order: 0%






misdemeanor): 0%


Verbal warning: 1

Written warning: 27


Administrative compliance order:0


order: 0






RCFC&WCD N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A



San Jacinto 0 0 0


Verbal warning: 0%

Written warning:0%


noncompliance: 0%


0%


order: 0%






misdemeanor): 0%


Verbal warning: 0

Written warning: 0


Administrative compliance order:0


order: 0










PERMITTEE

Provision No. XI.E.1 of the Permit requires each Permittee to develop and implement a Residential program to reduce the discharge of

Pollutants from residential activities to the MS4, consistent with the MEP standard, by July 29, 2011.

1. Please provide documentation of the Residential program to reduce the discharge of Pollutants from residential activities to the MS4.

Beaumont Attached are flyers that are distributed and would continue to be distributed to homeowners and others.

Calimesa

The City works closely with CR&R, known as "Recycling and Diversion of Construction and Demolition Waste" who provides roll off containers

to the City Public Works Department to ensure that we can recycle illegal dumping that may occur within the public right of way. See exhibit

"H" for illegal dumping.

Canyon Lake

The City of Canyon Lake's Residential Program is proactive in both its educational and monitoring efforts. City Staff and Trained Code and

Special Enforcements Officers educate residents on the proper ways to wash vehicles with runoff flowing into vegetation, application of lawn

fertilizers and outdoor cleaning of tools and painting supplies. The City also performs proactive visual inspections and contacts EVMWD for

water quality testing at discharge sites.

Corona

In addition to the County's public outreach program, City of Corona's Residential program consists of providing education materials on the BMPs

for the activities that are most likely to occur by residents of our City.

A. The County has developed BMP brochures targeting specific residential activities. The City distributes these brochures at various City events

and gatherings, at City Hall, at the City Library, and as needed when following up on complaints at residences.

B. The City's NPDES website provides BMP information for various residential activities and provides links for further resources, including a

link to the County's website where various BMP brochures can be downloaded.

C. The City distributed BMP information on swimming pool discharge procedures to all water utility customers in the water bill within this

permit term.

D. From time to time, the City utilizes the City's Corona Connection magazine to publish articles with an NPDES message. This magazine is

distributed to all Corona residences.

E. Twice per year, the City distributes information on the dates and location of the two household hazardous waste events the City sponsors that

are held in the parking lot at City Hall.

F. The City's NPDES message is also reiterated through Corona Department of Water & Power's "20% by 2020" campaign in which residents

are educated to reduce water use and thereby eliminate over-irrigation and any excess runoff leaving their property.

Eastvale The City of Eastvale employees and inspectors are trained properly to educate and catch any violations in the City's Residential Program. The

City also has in store and online public educations materials about pollution prevention, clean up, etc. that is readily available for residents.

Hemet

The City of Hemet distributes "Only Rain Down the Storm Drain" Public Education Program Fact Sheets/Brochures/BMPs and other appropriate

information to the residents at local events and from City offices in an effort to educate citizens about reducing the discharge of pollutants from

activities in residential areas. The City of Hemet promotes regional activities to facilitate the proper collection and management of used oil, toxic

and hazardous materials, and other household wastes. This includes distribution of information regarding the dates and locations of temporary

and permanent HHW and ABOP collection events and facilities and curbside or special collection sites managed by the City's solid waste hauler

CC&R and/or Riverside County. In addition, if during an inspection in response to a complaint, a City of Hemet Code Enforcement inspector

observes that a residence is non-compliant with the City's Stormwater Ordinance, enforcement procedures are undertaken, as appropriate, which

normally includes the distribution of educational materials on reducing the discharge of pollutants.



Jurupa Valley

The City participates in the residential program by providing flyers at community events, including the "Only Rain Down the Storm Drain"

flyers. The City has a contingency of horse owners and recommends the use of separate trash bins for horse manure. The City has a wide range

of community meetings particularly the "Healthy Jurupa Valley" group. This group discusses healthy living, good diet, good care of their living

space and good care of public space. They explain the duties of the City and how they benefit. The City has also sponsored cleanups along the

Santa Ana River.

Lake Elsinore See Appendix 2

Menifee

City of Menifee residents are encouraged to visit the Riverside County Watershed Protection website (http://www.rcwatershed.org/) to learn

more about storm water pollution. The District's "Only Rain Down the Storm Drain" program conducts a wide range of outreach activities that

aim to connect people's every day actions with receiving water quality. Residents may also receive educational materials from the District or

Watershed Protection Program during such activities, which are promoted by the City. The City provides handouts that describe common

residential BMPs, including proper pet waste disposal, lawn care, and swimming pool discharges at City Hall.

Moreno Valley Data to be provided by RCFC&WCD, as part of the overall NPDES program implementation services provided by them.

Norco

The City regularly promotes County programs and events related to storm water quality preservation. Focused educational materials are made

available at City Hall for residents. Inspection staff respond to complaints and are watchful of issues that can be proactively addressed when in

the field. Residential projects are monitored closely to ensure discharges of construction materials are prevented. Additionally, the City of Norco

has several sections in the

City Code that address the discharge of pollutants.

6.22 Public Nuisance Abatement

6.42 Municipal Refuse Collection Service

6.45 Manure management and Disposal

6.48 Public Dump Sites

6.60 Control of Flies

6.76 hog Ranches

6.84 Commercial Poultry

9.40 Refuse Abatement

Perris

The City of Perris currently implements a collection of programs (i.e. toxic and household waste collection, WQMP requirements, public

education campaigns, etc.) (See attached Exhibit 12) intended to reduce discharge of pollutants from residential activities, which are described

in the City's approved SWMP. The City of Perris consolidated and more fully described its residential storm water program efforts in its new

individual LIP.

http://www.rcwatershed.org/



Riverside

The City of Riverside has a multifaceted Residential program designed to educate and help residents maintain water quality. Several programs

contribute to the program's effectiveness including waste disposal events, pet waste control efforts, and public education. During FY 2015-16,

the City initiated the Adopt-a-Drain Program. Through this program, residents can help keep one of about 4,800 storm drains free of leaves, palm

fronds, trash, and other debris. Information regarding the program and storm drains that have been adopted can be found at

www.adoptadrainriverside.com. The City is also proactive in controlling litter and trash through a variety of programs. The City hosts monthly

'Free Drop-off Days' allowing residents to drop off residential trash, yard waste, tires, etc. Apart from these monthly opportunities, the City also

hosts periodic 'Clean Up Riverside's Environment' (CURE) events where residents are encouraged to bring bulky items and all manner of debris

and waste to designated areas for proper disposal. These events provide residents with opportunities to dispose of trash, litter, and other debris in

a manner that minimizes the impact on the environment. Another program involves the continued operation of solar-powered trash cans

throughout the City. The trash cans are equipped with solar-powered compactors which can compress approximately 200 gallons of trash into a

40 to 60 pound cube. The cans are located in areas of the community which are prone to high volume foot traffic to encourage the proper disposal

of wastes. The City also continues to manage a street sweeping program that resulted in the collection of over 4,700 tons of material in FY 2015-

2016. The City is also actively seeking ways to educate residents and visitors about animal waste and bacteria control. While the City does not

have significant areas with horses and other large animals as do some surrounding communities, it does have people walking and playing with

dogs and other pets. The City continues to operate and maintain several pet waste bag dispensers in popular walking areas most notably along

Victoria Ave. The dispensers act as a reminder of the importance of controlling animal waste and provide the public with a means to do their

part.

Riverside County The residential program is incorporated into the County's attached LIP

RCFC&WCD N/A

San Jacinto

City conducts routine sweeping of residential areas on a twice per month basis. Sweeper operators are requested to notify the City staff in

the event that they discover the discharge of pollutants from residential activities. In addition, Code Enforcement, Streets and Storm Drain

staff routinely patrol residential areas during the course of workday, in order to assess any discharges. Finally, on-call staff with the Public

Works Department will respond to after-hours reports of illegal discharge, abandoned bottles or drums and other items which may be left

in the public right of way.

http://www.adoptadrainriverside.com/





PERMITTEE Provision No. XI.E.6 of the Permit requires each Permittee to evaluate its Residential program.

1. Please provide documentation of the evaluation of the Residential program.

Beaumont

The City's residential program was reduced during the period of the re-establishment of the Public Works Department. There are flyers

available at the City's front desk for education regarding the minimization of fertilizers, pesticides and herbicides, the consequences of over-

irrigations and the importance of pet waste pick up. There are also brochures which are designed to inform the local residents to properly

collect and dispose of their pet wastes.

Calimesa See attached exhibit "Y" for the City of Calimesa Municipal Code Chapter 15.60 C&D Ordinance, also known as "Recycling and Diversion

of Construction and Demolition Waste"

Canyon Lake

Code Enforcement Officer and Special Enforcement Officers evaluate the residential program regularly to ensure that violations are addressed.

Our city staff meet monthly to review the residential program and proactively address needed compliance based on outfall and storm drain

monitoring.

Corona

This fiscal year, the NPDES Section responded to 113 calls regarding drainage of swimming pools and spas. There has been a gradual increase

in calls in recent years (36 calls in 2011, 76 in 2012, 99 in 2013, 102 in 2014, and 108 in 2015) – especially when comparing 2011 & 2012

numbers, which are likely due to focused outreach on proper drainage procedures provided through utility bills, City website, educational

materials distributed at City events, etc. Our goal is to reduce and eventually eliminate the number of calls we respond to regarding illegal

pool drainage. Additionally, complaints from residents regarding General Incidents may be attributed to the residential outreach program.

Once residents are aware of what is prohibited by the NPDES program, they are more likely to call and report their neighbors whom they

observe may be in violation. Another evaluation tool of the Residential program is tracking participation in events such as the HHW, and

other events focused on environmental sustainability. An increasing number of participants would signal the effectiveness of the outreach.

The City started tracking the number of participants at the HHW events held in City of Corona to see if there is a positive trend which we will

continue to evaluate.

Eastvale The program has since then been evaluated and no change to the Residential Program was deemed necessary.

Hemet

A review of the current Residential Program indicates that the main objective of the program, to provide educational information to City

residents to reduce the discharge of pollutants from residential activities, is being achieved. The City does this by offering brochures and

promotional items at city events and at various city offices. The City also provides educational information on the Integrated Waste

Management page of our website [http://www.cityofhemet.org/index.aspx?nid=93]. The City of Hemet has a contract with CR&R for trash,

recycling, and green waste services for residences within the city limits. The CR&R website offers information about the nearest Riverside

County Collection Center, as well as information and rates on a new Residential HHW Curbside Collection Program.

[http://www.crrwasteservices.com/cities/Hemet/residents/]

TABLE 8-1 RESIDENTIAL


Jurupa Valley

City staff regularly makes contact with residents in an effort to continue and advance the water quality practices in the City of Jurupa Valley.

Through this contact residents are educated and encouraged to take measures themselves to assist the City with its water quality

responsibilities.

Lake Elsinore

1) Participation in the Public Education Subcommittee of the MS4 Technical Advisory Committee

2) Participation by local schools in the stormwater pollution prevention assembly paid for by the MS4 Technical Advisory Committee

3) Speaking to tour groups at City Hall about stormwater pollution prevention.

4) Participation in City sponsored Pet Walk event through the handout of educational materials

5) Promotion and sponsorship of:

a. 10 Annual HHW Events in the City;

b. Battery Recycling at the Senior Center

c. Clean Extreme Events which bring hundreds of volunteers together to clean areas of the City.

d. Grant Program for Tire Recycling

e. Availability through Trash Service of 2 free bulky item curbside pickups per year

6) See-Click Fix Program for residents to report issues/IC/ID, etc. throughout the City.

7) Posting of No Dumping and No Littering signs throughout the City.

8) Adoption of revised Ordinance for Hazardous Vegetation and Rubbish Abatement on vacant properties throughout the City.

9) Publication of Stormwater Pollution BMP information on the City's Website at www.lake-elsinore.org

10) Posting of door hangers in residential areas where discharges have been reported.

11) Contract with Northwest Mosquito and Vector Control District for Vector concerns. Publication of service mailed to area.

The City is presently in the planning stages of a Task Force to address illegal dumping and litter throughout the City as well as participating

with Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) on a pilot program to address trash. The progress of these programs will be

reported in FY 16/17. See Appendix 2

Menifee

Investigations and enforcement of residential storm water ordinance violations are addressed and evaluated through the City's IC/ID program.

This program relies on the public and staff to notify the City of a possible storm water violation, and those violations are tracked (See

Attachment B). The City relies on the District to evaluate the overall effectiveness of its regional residential education efforts.

Moreno Valley The City implements the Residential Program as documented in the LIP per Section 13.8.

Norco

City staff are continually evaluating the City's Residential program to ensure resources are directed to areas of need based on the specific

demands of the City. Staff evaluate the source of reported or identified concerns raised throughout the City and continually look to eliminate

practices or situations in violation with the minimum water quality requirements.

Perris

The City of Perris maintains records of household waste collected and resident participation levels of various residential programs, including

household waste collection programs, and clean-up events. The City also maintains records of Final WQMP's approved and BMP's installed

for new residential development throughout the City. In addition, the City maintains records of all enforcement actions taken against those

suspected of violating City's Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls Ordinance. The City of Perris continues to collect large

amounts of household waste, debris, and bulky items through its waste programs and clean-up events; consistently continues to attract large

numbers of residents at the clean-up events; and continues to issue a variety of correction notices up to an including court citations for

misdemeanor violations. Finally, the City approves WQMP's which require the use of site design, source control and treatment control BMP's

on residential projects. This demonstrates that the residential program in place appears to be working sufficiently well. The City of Perris has

consolidated and more fully described its residential storm water program efforts in its new individual LIP.

http://www.lake-elsinore.org/

TABLE 8-1 RESIDENTIAL


Riverside

The City is continually searching for ways to educate residents and the public. As mentioned, the City continues to operate and maintain pet

waste bag dispensers in key areas throughout the City. The City's solar trash compactors remind residents of the importance of controlling

trash and litter. The City continues to host Clean-Up Riverside's Environment (CURE) events to provide residents with a clean and safe way

to dispose of waste. Through continued education and proactive residential education and initiatives, the City expects continued success in its

Residential Program

Riverside

County

As previously reported, the County adopted a revision to its landscaping ordinance which eliminated the option to have natural turf in the

front yards of new builder sponsored residential developments.

RCFC&WCD N/A – The District has no land-use authority and thus does not have a residential program.

San Jacinto City believes residential program is adequate.


Program Implementation Section 9 – Permittee Facilities and Activities Page 9-1

9. PERMITTEE FACILITIES AND ACTIVITIES

MS4 MAINTENANCE PROGRAM

Provision XI.C.2 of the 2010 MS4 Permit requires the Permittees to review and report MS4

maintenance procedures.

The status of the Permittees' maintenance programs is also shown in Table 9-1.

FERTILIZER/PESTICIDE APPLICATOR TRAINING REQUIREMENTS

Provision XIV.C.1 of the 2010 MS4 Permit requires that each Permittee applicator and contractor

maintain appropriate training, permits and certifications. Fertilizers are applied by certain Permittees

on a limited basis. In these cases, Permittee staff either applies the fertilizer or supervise contract staff

performing the application. If an application of pesticides results in a discharge to a Waters of the

United States, then a separate NPDES permit will be required.

Permittee staff who are licensed to apply pesticides are required by the California Department of

Pesticide Regulation (DPR) to meet continuing education standards. Licensing standards and

procedures are established by the DPR and described in the California Code of Regulations, Title 3

(Food and Agriculture) and on the DPR website at http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/license/liccert.htm.

In addition, each Permittee may be subject to the additional conditions from the Riverside County

Agricultural Commissioner for the application of Restricted Use pesticides.

Implementation of BMPs to manage the application, storage and disposal of pesticides, herbicides, and

fertilizers associated with Permittee facilities and activities are described in each Permittee Facility

Pollution Prevention Plan.

http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/license/liccert.htm

Table 9-1. Permittee Facilities and Activities


PERMITTEE FACILITIES AND ACTIVITIES 2015-2016 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT


Please provide the following metrics for assessment of the effectiveness of the Permittee Facilities and Activities Program:

PERMITTEE

1. Percent of Permittee facilities with appropriate BMPs identified:

2. Number of Permittee facilities with appropriate BMPs identified:

3. Percent of annual facility inspections that require follow-up actions:

4. Number of annual facility inspections that require follow-up actions:

5. Average percentage of follow-up actions identified in the previous year's Permittee facility inspections that were addressed:

6. Number of follow-up actions identified in the previous year's Permittee facility inspections that were addressed:

Beaumont 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1

Calimesa 100% 3 0% 0 0% 0

Canyon Lake 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0

Corona 100% 19 0% 0 0% 0

Eastvale 0% 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Hemet 100% 5 0% 0% 100% 1

Jurupa Valley 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0

Lake Elsinore 69% 25 31% 11 0% 0

Menifee 100% 9 0% 0 N/A N/A

Moreno Valley - - - - - -

Norco N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Perris - - - - - -

Riverside 0% 0 0% 0 N/A N/A

Riverside County 100% 11 0% 0 0% 0

RCFC&WCD 100% 1 100% 1 100% 1

San Jacinto 100% 8 0% 0 0% 0





Please provide the following metrics for assessment of the effectiveness of the Permittee Facilities and Activities Program:

PERMITTEE

7. Estimated tons of Waste removed by Permittee street sweeping:

8. Estimated tons of Waste removed by Permittee open channels:

9. Estimated tons of Waste removed from Permittee storm drain inlets:

Beaumont 65 0 0

Calimesa 97 4 ¼ +

Canyon Lake 54.23 0 7.9

Corona 2,522 39 4.7

Eastvale 550 N/A 19.24

Hemet 1,131.69 11 3

Jurupa Valley 1,315 6 31

Lake Elsinore 48 0 452

Menifee 462 Principle Permittee 46.8

Moreno Valley 2104 71 26.58

Norco 12 County Program 115

Perris 1,019.88 40.748 168.69

Riverside 4,773 390 390

Riverside

County 609.11 19.94 171.87

RCFC&WCD N/A 2,054 N/A

San Jacinto 600 800 5





Provision No. III.B.2.g of the Permit requires each Permittee to update their MS4 facility maps annually.

PERMITTEE 1. Please provide up-to-date MS4 facility maps.

Beaumont Facility Maps provided separately to David Barstad.

Calimesa The City has made no changes or revisions to our MS4 Facilities Map.


Corona This task is coordinated with the City's Information Technology Department and the District's GIS Coordinator. There were no updates for

this reporting period.

Eastvale See Attachment F

Hemet There have been no changes to MS4 facilities in 2015-2016; as a result no updates were made to the City of Hemet MS4 facility maps.

Jurupa Valley A map of all catch basins located in the City is attached herein.


Menifee The City completed a MS4 and major outfalls GIS layer during the 2014-15 fiscal year. No updates were done during 2015-16. Mapping

data have been provided to the District with the annual report submittal as requested.

Moreno Valley There were no changes to the MS4 facility maps. See Attachment E

Norco Maps to be sent to District Separately.

Perris

Please see the City's current Storm Drain Facilities Map (See Attachment Exhibit 14). In prior years although the City

provided regular red-lined versions of the City Storm Drain Facilities Map, thereby keeping an up-to-date inventory of facilities, changes had

not been entered into a GIS version of the Map. However, during this reporting period (FY '15-16), the City converted all existing electronic

data of its flood control facilities into a GIS format, and updated its new GIS map to include new flood control facilities built during the

reporting period. The new GIS version is dated October 4, 2016.

Riverside See attached documents

Riverside

County MS4 facility maps are provided by Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District.

RCFC&WCD The updated facilities maps are provided in Appendix F of the Annual Report.

San Jacinto No change in facilities from last year.





Provision No. XIV.A of the Permit requires each Permittee to annually review their activities and facilities to determine the need for revisions to

Section 5 of the DAMP and their LIP.

PERMITTEE Please provide the finding of this review and a schedule for any needed revisions to the LIP.

Beaumont The LIP will need to be revised in the 2016-2017 fiscal year. As described earlier in the report any revision and/or update of the City LIP be kept

in abeyance until WAP and the new MS4 permit are issued by the Regional Board.

Calimesa The City has made no revisions to the LIP as it pertains to our facilities. The City continues to annually review our activities and facilities to

ensure compliance with the DAMP and LIP.

Canyon Lake The City of Canyon Lake updated its DAMP in during FY 2015-16.

Corona The City developed the LIP which was noted in the 2013-14 report, and was certified by the Public Works Director under direction from the City

Manager by May 24, 2013. The City recently implemented departmental and personnel changes. We are working to update the LIP for these

changes which will be documented in next year's report.

Eastvale The City contracts with the county to annually manage and maintain all MS4 facilities, including those pipelines under 36" in diameter and all

catch basins. There is currently no need for revisions to Section 5 of the DAMP & LIP (update to match RCFC updates)

Hemet A review of municipal activities and facilities shows no need for revisions in corresponding sections of the City of Hemet Local Implementation

Plan.

Jurupa Valley There are no revisions during this reporting period.

Lake Elsinore

Permittee Projects – City process involves predesign meetings with all Departments to ensure that projects are designed in compliance with local,

state and federal requirements, to include NPDES. Project plans are again reviewed by all Departments to ensure compliance with the approved

pre-design requirements. WQMP's are required for all projects that meet fall in a category on the WQMP Guidance Checklist and road projects

are reviewed against the Transportation Road Project Guidance; all projects are subject to review for NPDES Permit compliance whether it be

General Construction, De Minimus Discharge, Industrial, etc.

Permittee Construction Activities – City projects are subject to General Construction Permit requirements as applicable and inspected by City

Engineering Department Inspectors for compliance.

Operation and Maintenance of Permittee Facilities – MS4 facilities are inspected and maintained as needed annually by staff in the Public Works

Department. Staff uses a manual system to track and log maintenance activity. Public Works Department Staff are on call and available to

respond to emergency situation resulting from rain events, Hazardous Waste Spills and implementation of pre-rain and post rain event preparation

activities. The City has 36 facilities it maintains; these include parks, buildings and parking lots. The BMP areas in need of maintenance are (4)

sites with grated inlets in landscape areas in need of cleanout; (3) sites with portable toilets in need of secondary containment and (2) sites

requiring dumpsters and trash containers to be kept covered.

Training for Municipal Maintenance Employees – all Public Works Department employees receive NPDES annually through training provided

by the City HR Department. Other training is provided on an as needed basis, that training includes pesticide application, hazardous material

handling and NPDES. EXHIBIT BB The City contracts with CalFire for fire service and has had no de minimus discharges. Based on the

findings above, no revisions to the LIP are warranted at this time. Staff will be provided with the inspection reports to work on the BMP issues

identified.



Menifee The City updated the LIP municipal inventory to include eight parks and one temporary Public Works yard behind City Hall.

Moreno Valley Staff reviewed the City's activities and facilities and determined no revision to the DAMP was necessary.

Norco No revisions found necessary.

Perris

Section 5 of the DAMP describes various Permittee Facilities and Activities. The Public Works Department, more particularly the Field Services

Division, Special Districts Division, and Engineering Administration Division are responsible for implementing and maintaining the municipal

activities and facilities. These Divisions provide a variety of services intended to provide pro-active maintenance of the City's municipal storm

drain system including inspection of outfalls, video and cleaning of pipe, catch basins, open channels, outfalls and Post Construction BMP's.

These Divisions are responsible for implementing the street sweeping program and clean-up of trash and debris from parks and City facilities.

Finally they are also responsible for street and landscape maintenance, as well as various household waste collection and oil recycling programs.

The City reviewed the requirements of Section 5, and more fully described any changes, if needed, to its municipal activities and facilities program

in the City's new Individual LIP.

Riverside The City continually evaluates its Facilities and Activities and seeks ways improve its programs. As opportunities for improvement are identified,

the LIP will be updated to reflect any changes. There were no changes to the LIP needed in FY 2015-2016.

Riverside County Only minor changes to the LIP were found necessary by TLMA.

RCFC&WCD

The District's Local Implementation Plan was updated on June 30, 2016 to include updates to the responsible division, at the District, for

implementation of permit requirements, changes to the Public Education Program name and activities, update regarding the LE/CL TMDL

revision, and the selection of two structural BMPs to address the Bacteria TMDL in the Santa Ana River. The update included the miles of

underground storm drains, open channels, levees and retention basins maintained by the District.

San Jacinto During FY15-16, the City updated and revised its LIP to incorporate various personnel changes, including changes to the DAMP. The City

anticipated revising the LIP in FY15-16 to incorporate the WAP requirements however it was not approved by the Regional Board.





Provision No. XIV.C of the Permit requires each Permittee to annually conduct inspections of its fixed facilities and field operations identified in Chapter 5

of the DAMP to ensure that they do not contribute Pollutants to receiving waters.

PERMITTEE Please provide the findings of these inspections.

Beaumont The City does not have a database of its fixed facilities at this time. A full investigation will be provided in the 2016-2017 fiscal year.

Calimesa The City does not have any pollutants going to any receiving waters. The City continues to ensure that we are in compliance with Chapter 5 of

the DAMP.

Canyon Lake Canyon Lake City Code Enforcement and Special Enforcement Officers and Canyon Lake POA Community Patrol perform visual inspections,

monitor discharge sites and contact EVMWD to perform periodic water quality testing.

Corona Annual facility inspections conducted this reporting year found the facilities to be in compliance.

Eastvale

The City of Eastvale does not own or operate any fixed facilities and therefore, field operations are minimal. The City does administer

transportation projects and follows the guidelines set forth in the LID Guidance and Standards for Transportation Projects, as indicated in Chapter

5.1.1 of the DAMP.

Hemet

City employees at the Corporation Yard have continued to reduce use of hoses in favor of washing vehicles and equipment in the covered wash

bay. Waste materials collected by street sweepers, green waste materials and incidental trash collected by public works crews are stored in

outdoor bins, segregated by type of waste. These waste materials are usually covered unless materials are being added. Fiber rolls are ready for

deployment across the open ends of the bins in the case of rain. Employees have reduced the amount of waste materials tracked or blown outside

the confines of the bins. We are continuing to work with CASC Engineering to implement structural treatment control BMPs on the two primary

discharge points for runoff from the Corporation Yard. An agreement for BMP design, specifications, and preparation of bid documents was

signed on August 29, 2016. Work on this project will begin in October 2016.

Jurupa Valley

The City does not currently own any facilities. There is one facility that is rented by the City (City Hall). Through visual inspection and routine

maintenance practices of general housekeeping procedures and proper material storage the Facility does not contribute or constitute a water

quality threat.


Menifee

The City of Menifee has eight public parks and one small temporary Public Works yard on its 2015-16 municipal inventory. All facilities were

inspected for compliance with storm water requirements in June 2016. No IC/IDs were observed during these inspections, and no facilities were

determined to be out of compliance or recommended for follow-up action. Corrective actions were communicated to City and contract staff to

address any minor BMP deficiencies. Attachment F includes the municipal inspection forms.

Moreno Valley There were no significant issues or deficiencies observed during the inspections for this reporting year.

Norco No issues found.



Perris

The City will continue to conduct the required facility assessments and update the Site Specific PPP as necessary, and report any updates to the

Regional Board. To date there have been no revisions made to the approved Site Specific Pollution Prevention Plan (SSPPP). During the

reporting period, however, the City relinquished ownership of the Municipal Yard " Annex" located at 403 E. 4th Street on June 22, 2016. This

facility will be removed from the City's LIP. The City will update its LIP to reflect this change, and the changes to the LIP will be provided in

the next Annual NPDES Permit.

Riverside

In Fiscal Year 2015-2016, permittee facilities were frequented by various City staffs. On-site staff routinely inspect their facilities to ensure

pollutants are prevented from entering receiving waters or if activities with a potential to discharge are being conducted, that appropriate BMPs

are employed. In Fiscal Year 2015-2016, 168 fixed facility inspections were conducted.

Riverside

County

Transportation Department owns and operates a total of 7 Yards and 4 Material sites in the Santa Ana River Watershed. See attachment document

titled "Santa Ana River Watershed Transportation Department Facilities Attachment D" for details of the inspections. The Transportation

Department owns and operates a total of 2,890 Inlets, 434 Outlets, 2,232 Culverts, 129 Soft Bottom Channels, 54 Hard Bottom Channels and 1

Basin in the Santa Ana River Watershed. See document titled "Santa Ana River Watershed Attachment A" and "Santa Ana River Watershed

Inspection and Maintenance Attachment B" for details.

RCFC&WCD A total of 3,909 work hours were logged in the field assessing District Facilities. In addition, our maintenance staff logged the following waste

removal numbers: Debris: 2,054 tons; Sediment Removed: 42,738 cy; Trash Removed: 82 tons;

San Jacinto Staff focuses inspection efforts on the basins and pump systems located throughout the city. In addition, the city staff inspect the eight city

facilities annually to ensure that all BMPs are in place and functional.





Provision No. XIV.D and XIV.E of the Permit requires each Permittee to annually review, update, and implement the individual clean out schedules and

frequency for its MS4 facilities.

PERMITTEE Please provide the findings of the review and any updates of the MS4 facility clean out schedule.

Beaumont The City does not have a database of its MS4 facilities at this time. A clean out schedules and frequencies will be provided in the 2016-2017

fiscal year.

Calimesa See exhibit "J" for schedule

Canyon Lake

The City of Canyon Lake has reviewed the annual clean out schedules of the MS4 facilities and found them to be adequate in eliminating

discharge to the MS4. The City has a contract with Downstream Services to clean the storm drains along Railroad Canyon Road 3 times per

year. Street sweeping is performed monthly, or more often if needed, along Railroad Canyon Road. Street sweeping within the private

community occurs twice a week.

Corona

Annual inspection is typical for the storm drain system, with more frequent schedules for facilities that pose greater threat to discharge pollutants

into the Receiving Waters. Regular maintenance is conducted as a result of schedules and inspections. Cleaning frequency is based on the

following priorities;

Low: Low density residential areas, areas with no prior history of illegal dumping, problems and/or complaints

Medium: Medium density residential areas, areas with modest amount of landscaping, collector streets, storm drain facilities with few complaints,

problems or history of an isolated incident that occurred in the past with no visible reoccurring pattern, facilities that had significant types and

amounts from past inspections or cleaning.

High: High density residential, commercial and industrial area, areas with significant amount of landscaping, major arterial, primary and

secondary streets, facilities that discharge directly to Receiving Waters and are classified under the Medium category above, facilities that have

been found to contain significant amounts of toxic pollutant based on past inspection cleaning. Analysis of the data collected during facility

cleanout identifies areas of higher priority and cleanout schedules are adjusted accordingly.

Eastvale The current schedule for the catch basin clean outs is found to be adequate. All other MS4 facilities (above 36") are subject to the County's clean

out schedule.

Hemet

City of Hemet maintenance staff continues to perform routine maintenance in MS4 facilities on an annual basis, including removal of trash and

debris, vegetation, sediments, and repair of erosion damage. Frequency of clean out is dependent upon need, which is determined by ongoing

facilities inspections.

Jurupa Valley The City of Jurupa Valley cleans a minimum of 830 of the 1038 catch basins located in the City annually in October of each year on a rotation

basis. That work has recently finished for the 2016-2017 Fiscal Year.

Lake Elsinore

Review of the MS4 Facility Maintenance and Operations procedure was discussed with the Supervisory Lead, Julian Perez. In discussing the

program, it was agreed that the City should look for a new system for tracking; currently data is tracked manually. The O&M Procedure was

reviewed and updated in the LIP.



Menifee

Catch basins in the City are annually inspected and cleaned out prior to the rainy season. (Note that open channels and detention basins in the

City are owned and maintained by RCFC&WCD.) The City contracts out catch basin maintenance and works with its contractor to verify that

its MS4 facilities are appropriately maintained. During annual inspection and maintenance, the contractor inspects for visual evidence of IC/IDs,

litter and/or debris accumulation, and other maintenance issues. No IC/IDs were reported in 2015-16. Those facilities where storage volume was

found to be 25% or more full, or that were impaired by sediment or debris, were cleaned. Attachment G is the Catch Basin Cleaning Inventory

for 2015-16.

Moreno Valley

For Publicly Owned Facilities Maintained by City: No changes were needed to the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the inspection and

clean out schedule for the City's MS4 facilities including streams, ditches, storm sewers, and storage basins. The SOP is available in the Public

Works Department Maintenance and Operations Division for review. The SOP will be made a part of the Local Implementation Plan (LIP). For

Privately owned Facilities Maintained by City: Through contracts with Homeowners Associations, the City maintains 33 water quality

basins/vegetated swales. The basins/swales are inspected at a minimum on a monthly basis and more frequently during the rainy season.

Maintenance and cleanout schedules are per maintenance contract arrangements with the HOA and the City's maintenance contractor. Staff

routinely evaluates the cleaning frequency of these facilities to protect Receiving Water Quality consistent with the MEP standard.

Norco Clean out program coordinated with Riverside County. No recommendations to change the program frequency received by the City. Schedule is

based on County program. Clean out of system to occur prior to the start of each rainy season.

Perris

The Public Works Department Field Services Division, Special Districts Division and Engineering Administration Division provide a variety of

services intended to provide pro-active maintenance of the City's municipal facilities and activities. In order to achieve this objective, the

department has instituted a street sweeping program. During the summer months, when water flows are rare, street right-of-way inspections are

increased to once in a week in all commercial and residential areas. This will prevent accumulated trash, household debris, sediment, and other

contaminants from entering catch basins, open channels, and other storm drain facilities. The Public Works Department Field Services Division,

Special Districts Division, and Engineering Administration Division are responsible for conducting routine inspections of city storm drains, to

insure that system does not become clogged or impaired by the accumulation of miscellaneous debris, and also ensures that sediments are removed

on a routine basis to prevent pollutants from entering downstream waterways. This includes above ground inspection of catch basins, detention

basins, open channels and box culverts. This also includes below ground inspection (i.e. video review) of underground pipe and box culverts, and

photo documenting (i.e. manhole inspections) of hydrodynamic separators and catch basins. Due to an extensive retrofit of 12 Flood Control

District Benefit Zones (BZ's) with Connector Pipe Screens, intended to serve as full capture devices, the City has increased the frequency of catch

basin cleaning for 289 Catch Basins (See Specifications FCD #1-2013-14-05). The City now cleans these particular catch basins three times per

year instead of twice a year as reported in previous annual reports. Generally speaking cleanings occur in June, October and January. Since these

"Full Capture" devices now remove pollutant laden sediment and trash on a more frequent basis, the amount of pollutants entering the

hydrodynamic separators and storm drain pipe is also reduced. Therefore, pipe cleaning in these particular BZ's has been reduced to a total of one

cleaning every two years, instead of the annual pipe cleaning reported in previous annual reports. The frequency of Hydrodynamic separator

cleaning remains the same: hydrodynamic separators are still cleaned once per year. The City's LIP will be updated to reflect these maintenance

changes and system descriptions, and the revisions will be provided to the Board in the next NPDES Annual Report. The maintenance schedule

for the remaining storm drain system in place throughout the City remains the same. Based on available resources, the City has determined that

it can manage a total of one inspection and cleaning of pipe (includes underground pipe & box culvert) and two inspections and cleanings of

catch basins (includes catch basins, ARS screens, REM Filters) per year. Generally speaking, in January, or during the wet/rainy season, individual

catch basins will be inspected for clogged and impaired filters, ARS Screens, CPS Screens, and accumulation of debris, and will be cleaned as

required. The second cleaning of catch basins will follow at the beginning of the summer season, and is normally scheduled or completed by

June. As for underground pipe, box culverts, any facility with standing water may indicate blocked pipe or storm drains, and will be cleaned or

repaired accordingly. However, as this is usually not the case, routine cleaning of underground pipe, box culverts will be cleaned once a year on



or before the beginning of the wet/rainy season, and is normally scheduled or completed by October. All underground facilities are video

documented. As for above ground detention basins, bioswales, infiltration basins, sand filters, and other natural flood control or BMP facilities

are inspected and cleaned on either: 1) monthly basis (routine maintenance above ground natural bioswales, detention basins and infiltration

basins), and 2) reconstruction/fine grading of detention basins, bioswales, infiltration trenches as needed or approximately every 2-5 years, and

3) Certain Outfalls, Channels, Swales are inspected and cleaned 5x per year (refer to SPEC FCD #1-2016-17-01). The City of Perris included its

inventory and maintenance schedules in its LIP, but plans to continue to refine and will more fully describe its inventory, inspection and

maintenance procedures.The City of Perris included its inventory and maintenance schedules in its new individual LIP, but plans to continue to

refine and will more fully describe its inventory, inspection and maintenance procedures in the City's new individual LIP. In addition to the

facilities described in the preceding paragraphs, the Illicit Connection/Illegal Discharge Monitoring Program for major city "Outfall Areas" will

need to be more thoroughly described in the City's new individual LIP. During the reporting period the City determined that the Outfalls identified

as PMP 7, PMP 8, and PMP 10, are actually RCFC & WCD Outfalls. Despite the identification of these 3 outfalls as RCFC &WCD Outfalls, the

City monitored all 32 "Outfall Areas" at least once, and the inspection was documented on the illicit discharge reporting forms. No sampling

was required, nor was any further investigation required. During the upcoming reporting period, 2016-17, the initial inventory will be refined for

accuracy, and the remaining portions of the City, including along the San Jacinto River, will be inventoried for the purpose of identifying

additional "Outfall Areas." Once these inventories have been completed, and regular monitoring procedures have been established in the LIP, a

concerted effort will be made by the City to more regularly conduct any required sampling, and by extension, the necessary follow-up and

investigation into suspected illegal connections/illegal discharge.

Riverside

The City's Storm Drain Maintenance Section provides frequent, routine maintenance of the storm drain system including cleaning of pipes,

channels, basins, and outlets. The following table summarizes their activities for Fiscal Year 2015-2016:

Activity Amount Units

Storm Pipe Cleaned 48,931 Linear Feet

Channel/V-Ditch Cleaned 27,549 Linear Feet

Basins Cleaned 2,777

Debris Removed 442 Cubic Yards

Soil Removed 322 Cubic Yards

Channel Repaired 45 Linear Feet

Pipe Replaced 339 Linear Feet

Concrete Channel Inspected 149,200 Linear Feet

Riverside County

The Transportation Department annually reviews and implements the individual clean out schedules and frequency for its MS4 facilities. The

schedule and frequency of routine maintenance of the MS4 facilities are based on the assigned priority as follows:

- "High" priority facilities will be inspected and maintained annually prior to the wet season and as often as needed prior to the wet season.

- "Medium" priority facilities will be inspected biannually and as often as needed prior to the wet season.

As per MS4 Permit, Transportation Department cleans all MS4 facilities where there is evidence of illegal discharge. Also, the Department cleans

all MS4 facilities where the inspections reveal that storage of volume is about 25% full/above or if accumulated sediment or debris impairs the

hydraulic capacity of the facility. In addition, at minimum, as per MS4 permit requirement, the Transportation Department inspects, cleans and

maintains at least 80% of its MS4 facilities with 100% of its facilities in a two (2) year period.

RCFC&WCD

District Maintenance staff reviews and updates their methodologies for performing maintenance on a case-by-case basis as the need arises for

each individual facility that undergoes inspection. The District established a full-time position in FY 2002-2003 whose main job duty includes

driving/inspecting all (100%) District MS4 facilities to evaluate current conditions on an annual basis.



San Jacinto

Due to staff reductions which occurred in November 2014, staff continues to respond to MS4 facility clean-outs on an on-call, as-needed basis.

Staff visually inspects the MS4 and inputs the need for MS4 clean-outs into the City's work order system. Work is accomplished as each work

order comes to the top of the list.





Provision No. XV.A of the MS4 Permit requires each Permittee to maintain a written and/or electronic record of stormwater training provided to its

stormwater and related staff. Note: this is also a measurable metric.

PERMITTEE Please provide the number of Permittee facility and MS4 operators and maintenance staff that attended Municipal training.

Beaumont There were 4-contract consultant staff who attended the RCFC&WCD sponsored training in spring and summer of 2016.

Calimesa See exhibit "V" for annual or bi-annual required training.

Canyon Lake The City of Canyon Lake is proactive in Municipal Training 3 staff members attended municipal training during FY 2015-16.

Corona Corona employees attended the following training this reporting year: 5 attended Construction Site Inspections; 1 attended WQMP; 2 attended

Industrial Commercial Facility Inspection; and 12 attended Municipal Facilities & Activities.

Eastvale 2 – See Attachment G (Training Records)

Hemet A total of 28 City of Hemet maintenance staff attended Municipal training in FY 2015-2016.

Jurupa Valley 10

Lake Elsinore 27

Menifee

Two City staff attended the District's formal municipal training session. Inspections of municipal facilities were completed by D-MAX

Engineering, Inc. D-MAX Engineering's storm water compliance inspectors are trained in-house on municipal BMP requirements. The MS4

maintenance contractor is required by the City to be trained every year and evaluated by the Public Works Department.

Moreno Valley This information will be provided by RFCD in the Consolidated Annual Report.

Norco The City's public works inspector has attended training during the reporting year.

Perris See attached Exhibit 15

Riverside 0

Riverside

County 40 Transportation Department Personnel attended Municipal Training. Please see attached Transportation NPDES Training Report database.

RCFC&WCD 0

San Jacinto None this year.

PROGRAM IMPLEMENATION

Program Implementation Section 10 – Development Planning Page 10-1

10. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING

Water Quality Management Plan

Section 2.3 of the existing Riverside County WQMP requires the Permittees to document their

procedures for WQMP administration and include a description of departments with

implementation responsibility. WQMP implementation procedures are contained in each agency's

specific Annual Report (Appendix J). The Permittees have several departments involved in

implementing and/or administering WQMP requirements. Table 10-1 (shown below) has been

edited to reflect the current departments with primary and secondary responsibility for providing

conditions of approval.

Table 10-1. Department Responsible for Conditions of Approval

Permittee Primary Responsibility Secondary Responsibility

County of Riverside Transportation Department Flood Control and Water Conservation District

Beaumont Department of Public Works Planning Department

Calimesa Bob French, Public Works Director Michael Thornton, City Engineer

Canyon Lake Russell Brady David Alvarez

Corona Public Works Department – Land Development Section

Public Works Department – NPDES Section

Eastvale Public Works Department N/A

Hemet Engineering Department Planning Department

Jurupa Valley Planning Engineering

Lake Elsinore Dina Purvis, Senior Engineering Technician Brad Fagrell, City Engineer

Menifee Jonathan Smith Yolanda Macalalad

Moreno Valley Public Works Director/City Engineer Engineering Division Manager

Norco - -

Perris City of Perris Engineering Administration City of Perris Engineering Department

Riverside Public Works Department Community Development Department

San Jacinto Development Services Contract City Engineer

TABLE 10-2 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING


DEVELOPMENT PLANNING 2015-2016 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT


Please provide the following metrics for assessment of the effectiveness of the New Development/Significant Redevelopment – WQMP program:

PERMITTEE

1. Acres of Significant Redevelopment

projects that incorporated LID-

based BMPs that are built and

completed:

2. Number of post-construction BMPS

properly maintained and operated:

3. Number of applicable planning staff

that attended WQMP training:

Beaumont 0 Unknown 0

Calimesa 0 0 0

Canyon Lake 0 0 0

Corona 24 104 1

Eastvale 0 0 0

Hemet 0 9 2

Jurupa Valley 0 6 1

Lake Elsinore 20.42 155 6

Menifee 650 390

Moreno Valley 2332 276 6

Norco - - -

Perris 0 82 -

Riverside 39.8 46 4

Riverside County 26 1 8

RCFC&WCD N/A N/A N/A

San Jacinto 0 31 2





Provision No. XII.G.6 of the MS4 Permit requires each Permittee to provide a summary of waivers of LID (along with a short description of the Section

XII.G.2 through XII.G.4 in-lieu program selected), Hydromodification and Treatment Control BMPs along with any water quality credit granted, in-lieu

projects, or urban runoff fund contribution required.

PERMITTEE Please provide a summary of waivers of LID issued during 2013-2014 FY, if any, as required by this provision.

Beaumont No waivers were issued during the 2015-2016 fiscal year.

Calimesa The City has had no development within the fiscal year that would have required consideration of the LID.

Canyon Lake

In order to comply with water quality regulations enforced by the State through the local Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control

Board, the Lake Elsinore & Canyon Lake Nutrient Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Task Force began using a state-funded grant

to begin alum water treatment in Canyon Lake in September 2013. When the alum is added to the lake, it binds immediately with the

phosphorous and effectively removes the opportunity for algae to grow. With less algae in the water, light can penetrate deeper into the

lake allowing plants to grow at the bottom while improving the overall health and water quality of the lake and fish life. The alum

treatment was a series of 5 treatments that occurred from September 2013 to September 2015. Alum treatments now take place twice a

year. The next scheduled treatments are May 2016 and September 2016.

Corona N/A

Eastvale No LID waivers have been processed during the FY 2014-2015.

Hemet No waivers of LID, Hydromodification and/or Treatment Control BMPs were requested or granted in 2015-2016. The City of Hemet

does not grant water quality credit, does not allow in-lieu projects, and does not have an urban runoff fund.

Jurupa Valley None were issued.

Lake Elsinore No Waivers were issued during FY 2015-16.

Menifee The City did not issue any LID waivers during 2015-16.

Moreno Valley None

Norco -

Perris N/A

Riverside None of the above occurred in FY 15-16.

Riverside County None

RCFC&WCD The District is a Special District by act of the State Legislature and has no land use authority.

San Jacinto None





Provision No. XII.K.4 requires each Permittee to maintain a database to track the operation and maintenance of the structural post-construction BMPs

installed after the adoption of the Order. This database must include: Type of BMP, watershed where it is located: date of certification: party responsible

for maintenance and any problems identified during inspection including any vector or nuisance problems.

PERMITTEE Please provide a list of all structural post-construction BMPs that have been approved and contained in the database required in

Provision No. XII.K.4.

Beaumont The City does not have a database of BMPs installed after the adoption of the Order. A full database will be provided in the 2016-2017 fiscal

year.

Calimesa The City has nothing to report during this reporting period. See exhibit "U" as reference.

Canyon Lake N/A

Corona SEE ATTACHMENT 'D'

Eastvale The City is currently working a database to track post-construction BMPs. Once those BMPs under construction are completed and the projects

are accepted, the City will begin to include these facilities in a database.

Hemet See Attachment E


Lake Elsinore EXHIBIT CC

Menifee See Attachment H – Structural Post-Construction BMP O&M_2015-16AR. The City conducted 22 full and partial inspections of public and

private structural BMPs in the 2015-16 fiscal year.

Moreno Valley See Attachment F

Norco --

Perris

During previous reporting periods the City made an extensive inventory of all Post Construction BMP's approved and/or installed for New

Development and Significant Development as part of the CNRP data collection effort (Comprehensive Nutrient Reduction Plan). The City

continues to update the CNRP inventory with Post Construction BMP's approved and/or constructed since 2010. This is a critical task, as the

CNRP was intended to be implemented using an adaptive process that relies on new information for measuring results, updating the predictive

models and re-fining the follow-on strategy The approved Post-Construction BMP's were approved as part of the San Jacinto Interim

Construction Permit SWPPP (Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan) and the Riverside County WQMP (Water Quality Management Plan).

This data base was updated during FY '15-'16 to include new BMP's installed and maintained during the current reporting period. This data

base was updated to include an additional 180.25 treatment acres during FY '15-'16 and describes Post-Construction BMP's for a new grand

total of 2,519.37 treatment acres. The City of Perris included seven (7) new developments on the data base required under Provision No. XII.K.4

(See attached Exhibit 9): 1) Stratford Industrial Site DPR 11-12-0004, 2) DPR 05-0493 Ridge 1 Fallas Parcel 2, 3) 7-Eleven Store DPR 13-02-

0014, 4) Perris Family Apartments DPR 12-03-0005, 5) Wal-Mart Super Store (including Parking Area) DPR 05-0343, 6) Duke 2 Wayfair DPR

06-0417, and 7) Les Schwab Tires DPR 14-00099. The acreage for these seven developments totals 180.25 treatment acres. This acreage has

been added to the inventory of Post-Construction BMP's provided for the CNRP. The total treatment acreage and number of "BMP's Installed"

noted in Question #2 of this section now reads 2,519.37 acres and 82, respectively



Riverside See attached document

Riverside County Please see attached database titled "WQMP Inventory and BMP Inspections".

RCFC&WCD N/A

San Jacinto City does not have staffing levels to maintain this database at this time. Staffing levels were further reduced through the layoff of 19 city

positions as a result of the failure to pass the Utility User Tax at the November 2014 election and have not been restored.





Provision No. XII.K.6 requires each Permittee to provide a list of all structural post-construction BMPs that have been approved after the adoption of the

order and contained in the database required in Provision No. XII.K.4.

PERMITTEE Please provide a list of all structural post-construction BMPs that have been approved and contained in the database required in

Provision No. XII.K.4.

Beaumont The City does not have a database of post-construction BMPs. A full database will be provided in the 2016-2017 fiscal year.

Calimesa The City has nothing to report during this reporting period.

Canyon Lake N/A

Corona

A. Vegetated swales

B. Underground infiltration chambers

C. Proprietary bmp – storm separator (hydrodynamic

separator)

D. proprietary bmp – contech urban biofilter

E. proprietary bmp – catch basin inserts

F. Proprietary bmp – jellyfish filtration units

G. Proprietary bmp – filterra filtration units

H. Proprietary bmp – smartsponge filters

I. Bioretention areas

J. Water quality inlet (oil/grit separator)

K. Extended detention basin

L. Proprietary device – stormtech chambers

M. Proprietary device – modular wetland system

Eastvale The City is currently working a database to track post-construction BMPs. Once those BMPs under construction are completed and the

projects are accepted, the City will begin to include these facilities in a database.

Hemet See Attachment E



Jurupa Valley

GP11-005 Jim's Plaza

GP11-015 Truck Sales

GP12-027 Park Mira Loma South -Phase II

GP12-028 Mission Plaza

GP12-029 Pro Auto Transport

GP12-035 O'Reilly Autoparts

GP12-037 Swift Transportation Company of AZ

GP12-038 Stratham Homes

GP13-001 Rancho Del Sol

GP13-002 Harvest Villages

GP13-005 Mission Estates

GP13-008 3790 De Forest Circle

GP13-011 Wheelock

GP13-014 Professional Auto Transport- Phase II

GP13-015 3873 Pyrite St. Car Wash

GP13-016 Pedley Square Shopping Center

GP13-017 Pulte Homes

GP13-020 CV Communities

GP13-021 Harvest Villages - Phase II

GP13-025 Family Dollar Store

GP13-029 Coastline Acquisitions

GP13-030 Golden Solar LLC

GP14-011 Suddhavasa Buddhist Meditation Center

GP14-012 Mira Loma Commerce Center- Lot 35

GP14-013 Mira Loma Commerce Center- Lot 41

GP14-014 Frontier Communities

GP14-020 Stadium Self Storage

GP14-022 Frontier Communities

GP14-033 Galena Business Park

GP15-008 Arturo Leal

GP15-027 Farwest Industries

GP15-028 Legends Shopping Center

GP15-029 Loring Ranch

GP15-030 Galena Business Park

GP15-039 Vista Rio

GP15-041 DR Horton

GP16-012 Fleetwood Commercial

GP16-014 Fleetwood Commercial

GP16-022 UPRR Auto Facility

GP16-025 ARCO Gas Station



Lake Elsinore EXHIBIT DD

Menifee See Attachment I – Approved Structural Post-Construction BMP 2015-16AR.

Moreno Valley See Attachment F

Norco --

Perris

For reporting purposes, the City of Perris has included the BMP's for seven (7) new developments on the data base required under Provision

No. XII.K.6 (See attached Exhibit 9) of the NPDES permit1) Stratford Industrial Site DPR 11-12-0004, 2) DPR 05-0493 Ridge 1 Fallas

Parcel 2, 3) 7-Eleven Store DPR 13-02-0014, 4) Perris Family Apartments DPR 12-03-0005, 5) Wal-Mart Super Store (including Parking

Area) DPR 05-0343, 6) Duke 2 Wayfair DPR 06-0417, and 7) Les Schwab Tires DPR 14-00099. This data base was updated during FY

'15-'16 to include new BMP's installed and maintained during the current reporting period. This data base was updated to include an

additional 180.25 treatment acres during FY '15-'16 and describes Post-Construction BMP's for a new grand total of 2,519.37 treatment

acres.The type and number of "BMP's Installed" has been added to the inventory of Post-Construction BMP's provided for the CNRP, the

total treatment acreage and number of "BMP's Installed" noted in Question #2 of this section now reads 2,519.37 acres and 82, respectively.

Riverside See attached document

Riverside County Please see attached database titled "WQMP Inventory and BMP Inspections".

RCFC&WCD N/A

San Jacinto In process – delayed due to lack of staffing.



Hydromodification

The Permittees, developed several programs that are required by the 2010 MS4 Permit, including

the Santa Ana Region Hydromodification Susceptibility Documentation Report and Mapping

Hydromodification Susceptibility Mapping, the Regional Geodatabase, and Retrofit Studies. The

different programs assisted in preparing the WAP described in Section XII.B of the 2010 MS4

Permit. The Permittees completed the Hydromodification Susceptibility Mapping which

delineated existing unarmored and soft-armored stream channels in the Permit Area that are

vulnerable to hydromodification from new development and significant redevelopment projects.

The mapping of the susceptible streams was completed in January 2012. The Regional

Geodatabase continues to be updated to include all of the latest information for watershed and

hydrologic subarea(s), downstream receiving waters including hydromodification susceptibility

and 303(d) listed pollutants, soil types, Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP)

areas, flood zones, District Master/Area Drainage Plans, and MS4 facilities. The Riverside County

BMP Retrofit Study was completed on January 10, 2013.

A draft WAP was submitted by the Permittees for SARWQCB approval on January 29, 2013. The

Permittees received comments from the SARWQCB on March 26, 2013 and submitted the revised

WAP on June 27, 2013. On January 29, 2014, the SAR Permittees developed a Hydromodification

Management Plan (HMP) that described how the delineation will be used on a per project,

subwatershed, and watershed basis to manage hydromodification caused by urban runoff

(XII.B.5).

The Permittees received comments from the SARWQCB on the revised WAP, HMP, and

Hydromodification Susceptibility Mapping and Report on December 18, 2013 and March 21,

2014, respectively. The WAP, HMP, and Hydromodification Susceptibility Mapping and Report

were re-submitted to the SARWQCB on May 29, 2014 and again on January 7, 2015. The District,

on behalf of the Permittees, continues to meet with the SARWQCB to finalize the WAP and

supporting hydromodification documents. The WAP was submitted again on June 18, 2015.

Within six months of approval by the SARWQCB, the Permittees will implement applicable

provisions of the approved revised DAMP into the LIP for watershed-wide coordination of the

WAP (XII.B.3 and XII.B.8).

SECTION 11

MONITORING ANNUAL REPORT

UNDER SEPARATE COVER


Program Implementation Section 12 – Public Education and Outreach Page 12-1

12. PUBLIC EDUCATION AND OUTREACH

This section provides an overview of watershed specific education activities conducted by the

Permittees during the reporting period.

PROGRAM OVERVIEW

The Riverside County NPDES Permittees have established an ongoing watershed based public

education and outreach program known as the Only Rain Down the Storm Drain Program is

transitioning. The program has undergone a re-branding effort with new logo and name; Riverside

County Watershed Protection Program. The specific objectives of the public education program

include:

Fostering a broad public awareness of water pollution concerns;

Increasing public acceptance of pollution prevention activities to curtail everyday human

behaviors that contribute to water quality problems;

Educating/informing the general public, regulators and key local government, and state

decision makers on urban runoff conditions in Riverside County; and

Promoting stewardship of local water resources in both English and Spanish.

The Riverside County Watershed Protection Program implements the public awareness objectives by

focusing on three areas of pollutant reduction/prevention:

Public behavior;

Proper management of pollutants; and

Business specific education outreach.

In addition, when attempting to make use of the finite resources available for the public education

program, the Permittees use these management goals to ensure that resources are used effectively:

Focusing on pollutants of concern specific to each watershed region;

Coordinating public education efforts with adjacent stormwater management programs and

other related education programs to share resources, coordinate outreach efforts, and avoid

costly duplication of effort; and

Adopting public education programs and objectives based on effectiveness analysis to

address changing MS4 programs and objectives.

PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS

Updating and revising brochures to capture the interest of key target audiences.

Updating the program website to cross promote key messages through other social media

vehicles.

Refreshing the logo and branding of the program to compliment a social media market.



SANTA ANA POLLUTANTS OF CONCERN

Based on monitoring data collected to date, the current 303(d) list, and discussions among the

Permittees and stakeholders, the following pollutants of concern were established for the watershed.

More discussion on the selection of preventative pollutants of concern can be found in the monitoring

section of this Annual Report. After each identified pollutant, specific BMP outreach activities are

identified to address these pollutants:

Sedimentation associated with urban development and land uses:

Construction, municipal, industrial/commercial, and new development training focusing on

the need to address erosion control and sedimentation within the watershed;

County building inspectors distributed After the Storm brochures during site visits;

Distribution of the Landscape and Gardening brochure;

Construction activities outreach materials to be available during the regularly scheduled

Permittee employee training sessions;

Distribution of dust pans featuring the "Only Rain Down the Storm Drain" message to

promote the dry cleaning of driveways and impervious surfaces;

Distribution of sponges and shop cloths to promote cleanup of spills to help prevent them

from discharging into the storm drain; and

Adult stormwater education presentations that include instruction on controlling erosion.

Nutrients associated with urban development and land uses:

The Agricultural Commissioner assists in the distribution of Only Rain Down the Storm

Drain materials;

County Waste Management distributes and makes available at their composting workshops

the After the Storm brochure;

Keep Our Water Clean, a video that focuses on proper use of fertilizers and avoiding excess

runoff from sprinklers;

Includes specific section within municipal employee training that focuses on the need to

address increased nutrients within the watershed;

Provides County's HHW flyer to incoming residents about safe disposal of hazardous waste

and includes the 1-800 toll free number to report illegal disposal into the storm drain;

Distribution of the After the Storm brochure;

Distribution of the Landscape and Gardening brochure;

Distribution of the Pet Waste What's the Scoop brochure; and

Distribution of the Tips for Horse Care brochure and flyer covering equestrian care and

management.



Pathogens associated with urban development and land uses

Construction, municipal, industrial/commercial and new development training focusing on

the need to address pathogen sources within the watershed;

Distribute pet waste information in pet stores, veterinarian clinics, kennels and pet grooming

facilities;

Coordination with Riverside County Animal Control Department and private "no kill" pet

shelters to distribute Pet Waste What's the Scoop and After the Storm brochures to families

adopting pets at the shelters;

Distribution of the Landscape and Gardening brochure; and

Distribution of the Tips for Maintaining a Septic Tank System brochure.

In addition, the District has developed other outreach materials to focus on other pollutants and

pollutant causing activities/businesses commonly associated with urban runoff.

24-hour Watershed-Wide Outreach Portals

The Permittees maintain three 24-hour watershed wide portals to receive and distribute information

regarding the "Riverside County Watershed Protection" program. These portals include a website, a

1.800.506.2555 toll free number, and an e-mail address.

Riverside County Watershed Protection Website

The District operates a website that provides information on how to report illegal dumping, clogged

storm drains, lack of curb markers, and provides information on upcoming activities and opportunities

for public participation in program development and general information about urban runoff pollution

prevention techniques. The new website is located at: http://rcwatershed.org. There is also a link on

the County's main page advocating reporting illegal storm drain disposal.

Most of the District's outreach materials are on the public information webpage including brochures

that have been scanned into electronic .pdf file formats and are available for download.

Stormwater Toll Free 1-800 Hotline

A toll free 800 telephone number (1.800.506.2555) for reporting suspected stormwater pollution and

obtaining pollution prevention information. This call line links to Riverside County Environmental

Health or Riverside County Waste Management to obtain household hazardous waste collection

workshop dates and locations, or information on grass re-cycling and composting. The 24-hour toll

free number also allows callers to report clogged catch basin inlets, illegal dumping, and other illicit

discharge violations. Finally, the hotline allows people to order public education materials and/or

request stormwater presentations for schools or community groups. The toll free number is widely

publicized in all public education outreach materials and promotional items, listed in telephone

directories, and registered in Riverside County 211, a non-profit community help line.

http://rcwatershed.org/



Callers reporting illicit discharges are directed to County Code Enforcement, who accepts the calls and

then re-directs them to appropriate Permittee Code Enforcement departments. Calls for public

education materials or presentations are routed to the District's front desk and then to the District's

public education staff. The specific text to the hotline is included as Exhibit A.

The provider of the toll free 800 number, Riverside County Information Technology, tracks the number

of incoming calls. The number of toll free calls received and tracked from July 2015 through June

2016 was 586.

E-mail

The District also maintains an e-mail address that can be used to report illicit discharges or request

stormwater related public information. The e-mail address is: [email protected].

mailto:[email protected]


PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION Section 12 – Public Education and Outreach Page 12-5

Exhibit A

DIALOGUE

Program Coordination with other Stakeholders

The Watershed Protection Program collaborates extensively to leverage and increase available

resources. Partnerships have been established with local environmental groups, business organizations,

cities, and public and private entities. These partnerships help maximize use of existing distribution

outlets, events, programs, and materials. Impressions, attendance, and other measures of effectiveness

relative to these programs are included in Appendix E of this Annual Report.

To leverage education outreach resources and coordinate public education activities with other

environmental programs, the Permittees closely coordinate and/or have existing partnerships with the

following entities/organizations:

Santa Ana River Watershed Clean-Up Stakeholders Group

The annual clean-up program continues with the support of the District, and includes Keep

Riverside Clean and Beautiful and other community groups and agencies. This

RIVERSIDE COUNTY WATERSHED PROTECTION PROGRAM

TOLL FREE 800 LINE DIALOGUE

Introduction - Part 1 Thank you for calling Riverside County's "Only Rain Down the Storm Drain Pollution Prevention" Hotline. If this is an

emergency, hang up and immediately dial 911.

(Please listen carefully to the following options before making your selection).

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Instructional portion – Part 2

For abandoned drums, used motor oil or chemical dumping, call County Hazardous Materials @ 951-358-5055. For

after-hours and weekend communications, press _1_ (Drops to 951-782-2973) changed from 951 358-5245 per HHW

11/30/09

For reporting other forms of illegal dumping, press __2__ (Drops to 1-888-782-6263)

For construction site runoff and discharges, press _3__ (Drops to 951-955-1400)

For street flooding issues, press _4__ (Drops to 951-955-6899)

For septic tank overflows, illicit connections, gray water or other types of discharges, press __5_ (Drops to 1-888-722-

4234)

For Household Hazardous Waste disposal or other inquiries, call County Waste Management Press 6__ (Drops to 1-

800-304-2226)

The County's "Only Rain Down the Storm Drain" public education program, offers presentations to Riverside County

residents, adults, schools, and community interest groups. To leave a message after hours, please press _7__ (Drops to

51200)

This line is sponsored by the Cities and County of Riverside's Watershed Protection Program. The Flood Control District is

opened Monday through Friday from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. For general information about District services, call 951-955-1200

during normal business hours.



collaboration of environmental partners support and encourage volunteers, and allies and

groups, to gather for a day to remove trash and debris from the Santa Ana River that might

otherwise flow downstream to the ocean.

In addition the Watershed Protection Program also coordinates with the following

City/County departments to distribute appropriate stormwater education outreach materials:

o Cities/County/District Front Counters

o County Waste Management

o County Environmental Health Department

o County Agriculture Department

o County Executive Offices

o County Code Enforcement

o County Regional Parks

o County Animal Control

o County Economic Development Agency

o County Assessor/Recorder's Office

o County Fleet Services

o County Human Resources

o County/City Library Systems

o County Department of Social Services

o County Transportation and Land Management

o County Sheriff

o County Fair Housing Department

o County Business License

Finally, the Watershed Protection Program also coordinates with the following state and/or local

government or business entities to distribute public education information:

Western Riverside Council of Governments

Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board

Orange County Watershed & Coastal Resources Division

Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority

South Coast Air Quality Management District

Santa Rosa Plateau Reserve

United States Bureau of Reclamation

Elsinore Valley Municipal Water

Rancho California Water District

Jurupa Community Service District

Habitat for Humanity in Riverside

Department of Water Resources Southern California District

Western Municipal Water District

Riverside Unified School District After School Programs



Fair Housing Council of Riverside

Eastern Municipal Water District

The Water Education Center in Hemet District

Metropolitan Water District

Lake Elsinore/San Jacinto Watershed Authority

General Community Outreach

The Watershed Protection Program participates in various community events to ensure that our

message is delivered to the largest possible municipal audience. These community events also provide

an opportunity to survey attendees and assess their public knowledge of stormwater pollution

prevention.

In addition, the Watershed Protection Program has partnered with Riverside County Waste

Management to ensure stormwater pollution prevention information is available at many HHW and

ABOP collection centers and/or events held within each of Riverside County's principal watersheds

(Santa Ana, Santa Margarita, and Whitewater). These events provide free disposal sites for common

pollutants that can impair receiving waters.

The program's urban runoff materials and promotional items are also distributed through community

cleanup partnerships with Riverside County Code Enforcement Administration, whose undertaking is

to achieve voluntary compliance in all phases of community revitalization. Staff works closely with

the community improvement specialists, ensuring that residential stormwater pollution prevention

material packets are on hand for distribution on inspection visits, complaint investigations, and at

neighborhood or community presentations.

When a complaint warranting an investigation is received, the information is entered into a database

and then followed up with an NPDES staff inspection. Following the investigation, when appropriate,

the inspector then canvasses the area with storm drain pollution prevention brochures, HHW collection

schedules and/or door hangers.

Adult Outreach

The Watershed Protection Program contracts with SGA to provide urban runoff educational

presentations to the targeted audiences.

SGA provides this outreach through workshops at major home improvement stores throughout

Riverside County. These workshops include a handout that educates the store's employees about

stormwater impacts that could occur from improper application of paint, pesticides, or fertilizers.

Attendees at the workshop also receive watershed protection information and promotional items to help

reinforce the stormwater protection message. The employees are then able to share with customers the

proper use and disposal of products that are potential storm drain pollutants. Point of purchase displays,

tear sheets, and counter displays have been installed at strategic locations to educate the public directly.

Additional details can be found in the SGA Annual Report in Appendix E.



Outreach Tools Specific to Pollutants

The Watershed Protection Program conducts a wide range of outreach activities focusing on reduction

of certain pollutants in the receiving waters. These outreach activities focus on sources of those

pollutants whether it is residential, business, municipal or some other state or federal source. Education

materials explain how everyday activities of potential sources may contribute to the pollution of

receiving waters, and encourage the sources to adopt alternative approaches to pollutant management

that will lessen or eliminate pollution-causing activities. Program efforts include providing information

on pollution prevention techniques and informing sources about the proper disposal of pollutants.

Brochures

After the Storm

o Educate/inform on impacts from dumping pollutants into storm drainage systems

o Educate on the clean-up and proper disposal of pet waste

o Develop programs for landowners on erosion and sediment control practices

Landscaping and Gardening

o Use for pesticides, fertilizers, and herbicides

Tips for Horse Care

o Educate/inform on impacts from littering and improper waste disposal


What's the Scoop (Pet Waste)



Tips for Maintaining a Septic Tank System


Automotive Maintenance and Car Care

o Educate on impacts from gasoline, fuel oil, and oil and grease

o Educate on the need to keep stormwater from contacting potential contaminants

o Cover contaminants and prevent runoff through polluted areas

Outdoor Cleaning Activities and Professional Mobile Service Providers


o Educate on impacts from gasoline, fuel oil, and oil and grease


Swimming Pool, Jacuzzi and Fountain Maintenance


Food Service Industry

o Educate on the need to keep stormwater from contacting potential contaminants


Other Outreach Materials

In addition to the brochures mentioned above, the program utilizes other effective outreach materials

such as: flyers, dust pans, shelf talkers, and tear sheets to foster interest in the Program.



Mailing Inserts

The Watershed Protection program publicizes the dates and locations of HHW collection events

through the use of mail inserts. Inserts are included in various utility bills and special notices.

Cooperative Used Oil Program

The WRCOG is responsible for administering the Used Oil Block Cycle Grant on behalf of 17 Cities

within WRCOGs boundaries. These Cities include Banning, Calimesa, Canyon Lake, Corona,

Eastvale, Hemet, Jurupa Valley, Lake Elsinore, Menifee, Moreno Valley, Murrieta, Norco, Perris,

Riverside, San Jacinto, Temecula, and Wildomar. The target audience is the do-it-yourselfers

(DIYers).

One of WRCOGs goals is to make it convenient for residents to recycle their used oil and to make it

easy for them to find a certified center accepting used oil. In order for these centers to be certified,

they need to apply for certification with the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB).

WRCOG contacts the non-certified centers to explain the program and hopefully interest them in

becoming a certified used motor oil collection center. The goal is to see a significant decrease in the

amount of illegally dumped motor oil through the addition of new certified centers within driving

distance of the DIYer.

WRCOG also provides secure oil containers on an as needed basis to the certified centers for

distribution among DIYers at no cost to minimize the chance of spillage and a hazardous situation.

Through WRCOG efforts including site visits, all certified centers in the County are in compliance to

state and local mandates.

The WRCOG program also includes public education. This includes hosting a booth at large venue

events, conducting surveys to see how informed the local community is regarding used oil recycling,

distributing brochures in both English and Spanish with information regarding used oil drop-off

locations, curbside programs, and other local recycling programs. The program also maintains an

English and Spanish 800 toll free number that can be used to get answers to any recycling question a

resident may have regarding, "Where is the nearest Certified Center located?" and "Where can I find a

used oil container?". The phone number is printed on all distributed materials including the oil

containers.

As mentioned, WRCOG provides brochures in Spanish, as Riverside County has a large Spanish-

speaking population that needs to be reached. By educating this group with the right information

concerning used oil recycling, WRCOG hopes an increase in used oil recycling will occur throughout

their Riverside County jurisdiction.

Western Riverside County Clean Cities Program

WRCOG created the Cleanest County in the West program to address issues relating to litter and illegal

dumping. The program was designed to assist jurisdictions in meeting the 50% diversion goals

mandated by the state legislature.



WRCOG also participates in large venue events to promote the use of alternative vehicle fuels. The

Car Care for Clean Air program's objective is to increase public awareness regarding the benefits of

proper vehicle maintenance. These events give staff an opportunity to assess how informed the local

community is regarding recycling and allows us to distribute brochures and informational flyers that

will assist people in finding the nearest recycling center.

Direct Business Outreach Activities

Restaurants and businesses that handle hazardous wastes are inspected by the Permittees, for potential

stormwater impacts from their activities. Each business is provided with educational information

specific to their typical business activities.

The County of Riverside requires all businesses in Riverside County to obtain a business license.

Billing inserts were developed for the County's Transportation and Land Management Agency's

Business License Division and included in all license renewal notices. New businesses receive

stormwater education material that is affixed to their application.

Our partnership with the County's Business License Division continues to be successful by providing

direct outreach to business owners about behaviors that contribute to water quality problems. Direct

outreach is made in the form of an insert that is issued to new business license applicants and inserted

into annual renewal reminders. The insert includes information on the OnlyRain Down the Storm

Drain program and the toll free 800 number portal used for reporting illegal

Public Education Materials

Examples of various public education materials the Permittees distribute are included in Appendix E.

TABLE 12-1 PUBLIC EDUCATION AND OUTREACH


PUBLIC EDUCATION AND OUTREACH 2015-2016 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT


Provision No. XIII.J requires each Permittee to annually sponsor or staff an Urban Runoff table or booth at community, regional, and/or countywide events

to distribute public information materials to the public.

PERMITTEE Please describe your Permittee's participation in sponsoring or staffing an Urban Runoff table or booth at community, regional,

and/or countywide events to distribute public information materials to the public during FY 2015-2016.

Beaumont Due to staff turnover, community events were provided only with the flyers described above, in residential programs.

Calimesa

The City provides handouts and information at the Building and Safety counter, City Hall public counter to builders, as well as the public

at large. Twice a year, the City participates at the local street fair at which City staff provides public outreach to include brochures,

magnets, and other outreach materials. In addition, the City verbally provides information to the public during the street fair. The City

has a wealth of information and handouts available on the City's website.

Canyon Lake

The City of Canyon Lake takes every opportunity to educate the public by having Code Enforcement Officers distribute informational

pamphlets in regard to several MS4 issues. The City of Canyon Lake sends out informational pamphlets to businesses who perform

NPDES related Construction, and these pamphlets are available at the City Hall Office.

Corona

1. Inner-coastal Watershed Cleanup Day, October 10, 2015

City staff organized this cleanup event held at the Auburndale Road crossing of Temescal Creek. Nearly 100 volunteers, mostly

students from local middle and high schools, participated to remove approximately 4 tons of trash from the waterway. City staff

assisted with the trash removal. Storm water educational materials were distributed to all event attendees.

2. City Hall Garden Festival, April 2, 2016

As a continuation to 2013's grand opening event, the Garden Festival was a water-use efficiency day to help the public learn that being

California-Friendly is beautiful and water efficient. By walking through the garden while observing and learning about different plant

materials, residents are able to apply similar landscapes at their homes and businesses. City of Corona staff distributed storm water

educational materials to over 1,000 attendees at this event.

Eastvale

In addition to working closely with County Public Education Program and efforts, the City also actively participates in public events such

as holiday gatherings at parks, public/community meetings, public concerts, and more. The City hosts a booth at these events to raise

public awareness of storm water pollution and pollution prevention.

Hemet

The City of Hemet Public Works Department participated in the Hemet San Jacinto Valley Chamber of Commerce Business Expo on

August 26, 2015. The event was held at the Hemet Valley Mall. Description of Exhibit: "Everything Environmental"– Information and

promotional items related to water conservation, waste recycling, energy efficiency and storm water pollution prevention. Three public

works employees were available to answer questions.



Jurupa Valley

The City provides public information materials at all City Council meetings, Healthy Jurupa Valley meetings and at community events

held at City Hall. The City encourages attendance at City sponsored and other agency sponsored events involving waterway cleanups.

The City has sponsored these events during this period. The City sponsored a Santa Ana River clean up event, coordinated by the Santa

Ana River Trust in conjunction with other organizations. These events removed debris and litter from the riverbed and watershed. The

City mailed a brief NPDES overview flyer to commercial and industrial businesses in the City. The City has developed an inspection

program with registered businesses that provided free inspections the first year. These inspections provided assurance to the businesses

that they are compliant with the NPDES/MS4 Permit and provided instructional materials. While completing inspections to commercial

and industrial facilities, inspectors provide business with education material.

Lake Elsinore The City staffed a booth at the City's Annual Pet Walk. At the event, pet waste brochures, storm water brochures and pet waste dispenser

w/ bags were provided. Contact information was also secured. See Appendix 2 "Pet Walk 2016"

Menifee The City contributes funds to the District's Public Education Program through the Implementation Agreement and, therefore, plays a

supportive role in all of the program's outreach efforts.

Moreno Valley

Through the NPDES Implementation Agreement Moreno Valley funds a part of the comprehensive Public Education Program.

RCFC&WCD will provide the particulars to the locations and staffing of an Urban Runoff table or booth in the Consolidated Annual

Report.

Norco The City partners with the County on these programs.

Perris

The City of Perris sponsors or participates in several events throughout the year, including, but not limited to the Citywide Clean-Up Day,

Tour de Perris, Perris Live Well Health Fair, and the Southern California Farmer's Fair. Among several goals of the events, one is to

provide and receive information from the community (See Exhibit 13). Representatives for the City's NPDES program typically man a

booth and provide public information materials including: general NPDES information for residential, commercial/industrial, and

constructions sites. Information specific to the San Jacinto Watershed was also provided to attendees along with NPDES-themed rulers,

sponges, pens, pencils, crayons, shoe laces and dust pans. See Exhibit 13 for copies of the outreach materials provided at events.

The following brochures and handouts were made available at the events:

What You Should Know for General Construction & Site Supervision

Did You Know…Your Facility May Need a Storm Water Permit?

What You Should Know for The Food Industry

What You Should Know for Outdoor Cleaning Activities & Professional Mobile Service Providers

What You Should Know for Swimming Pool, Jacuzzi and Fountain Maintenance

What's the Scoop? Tips for a Healthy Pet and Healthier Environment

Stormwater Pollution and the Solutions

What You Should Know About Industrial & Commercial Facilities

What You Should Know About Automotive Maintenance &Car Care

Tips For Horse Care

Tips For Maintaining A Septic Tank



Riverside

In FY 2015-16 the Environmental Compliance Section provided storm water and urban runoff information to the public at five community

events as summarized below:

Date Event Name Representatives Hours

02/20/2016 LULAC Health Fair 4 20

03/12/2016 Eastside Community Fair and Egg Hunt 2 12

03/20/2016 Farmer's Market at Tyler Mall 2 13

04/11/2016 Riverside Airport 24th Annual Air Show 4 22

04/17/2016 Farmer's Market at Tyler Mall 2 12

05/11/2016 Duck Daze 2 12

During these events, Environmental Compliance Inspectors distribute public education materials with environmentally focused

messages including posters, hats, bracelets, pencils, pens, coloring books, fans, and more. Demonstrations using the diorama are also

given to educate attendees. In addition to the regional programs, the City of Riverside performs other public education activities

including displaying environmental messages on an electric billboard at the 91 freeway near University exit. The billboard can be seen

from both east and west bound traffic and reaches an estimated 250,000 people daily. Examples of the images displayed are:

Riverside County The Flood Control and Water Conservation District operates the Regional Public Education program, which the County is a funding

participant of through the Implementation Agreement.

RCFC&WCD The District takes the lead role in attending community, regional, and countywide events for the public education program. See Appendix

E for additional details.

San Jacinto

City provides information during community events as appropriate including distribution of educational materials at the front

counter of the City's planning and building department. Due to budget considerations, city cancelled most public outreach events in

FY15-16.


PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION Section 13 – Program Effectiveness Assessment Page 13-1

13. PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS ASSESSMENT

The Permittees regularly assess the component programs to identify improvements that will promote

the reduction of pollutants in urban runoff to the MEP while also supporting the responsible

management and allocation of the public resources available to implement their programs. A

quantitative and qualitative assessment of each Permittee's program can be found in the Permittee's

individual Annual Report.

Evaluation of the DAMP includes short-term and long-term strategies. The long-term strategy for

assessing effectiveness will focus on water quality data obtained as part of the CMP, which is

beginning its first full year of implementation during this fiscal year based upon response to

comments from the SARWQCB being delayed. This is, by necessity, a long-term strategy since the

first step will be to develop and understand baseline data. Due to the inherent variability of urban

runoff, years of monitoring data are necessary to identify statistically significant trends or draw

conclusions on program effectiveness. Additionally, because (i) there are numerous program

elements being implemented and revised concurrently, (ii) other environmental programs and

regulations indirectly impact urban runoff, e.g., pesticide regulation, and (iii) numerous other

climatological, man-made, and environmental changes occur within the watershed over time, the

ability to identify specific cause-and-effect relationships between a specific program element and/or

BMP and improvement in the quality of urban runoff is complicated, if not infeasible, in many cases.

The short-term strategy for assessing program effectiveness focuses on quantitative, indirect methods

(that is, not directly based on the quality of urban runoff or receiving water quality) of assessment.

Each year the District will collect various metrics defined in the DAMP (as provided in the Annual

Reporting Forms) to assist with program evaluation. As part of the ROWD, the Permittees will

evaluate these metrics, including water quality data, in an effort to assess overall DAMP

effectiveness. On an annual basis, the District will review the metrics to determine if any course

corrections on existing BMPs are required. Permittees utilized the CASQA Guidance for developing

these assessment measures at the following six outcome levels:

The CASQA Effectiveness Levels are:

Level 1 – Documenting activities. Level 1 Outcomes provide the program managers with direct

feedback on whether the control measures are being developed and implemented as planned and on

schedule. Level 1 Outcomes are assumed to be beneficial to water quality, reflect program

implementation, and are not indicators of the impact of implementation on the environment.

Level 2 – Raising awareness. Level 2 Outcomes provide program managers with feedback on how

effective the control measures have been in raising awareness and changing attitudes of target



audiences. Level 2 Outcomes are assumed to be beneficial to the environment as increased

awareness and attitudinal changes provide the basis for behavioral change.

Level 3 – Changing behavior. By building on Level 2, Level 3 Outcomes provide program managers

with feedback on how effective the program elements and control measures have been in motivating

target audiences to change their behaviors and implement appropriate BMPs. At Level 3, control

measures focus on providing information and incentives for target audiences to take action by

changing behavior and implementing recommended BMPs. Both quantitative (i.e., statistically

valid) and qualitative methods are used to measure behavior changes. Methods used to measure

behavior changes include those used for Level 2 Outcomes as well as direct observation via site

visits. Level 3 Outcomes may take the form of a percent and/or change in the percentage of the target

audience demonstrating that a behavior change has occurred such as an increase in number of BMPs

implemented and maintained at construction sites.

Level 4 – Reducing loads from sources. Level 4 Outcomes provide program managers with feedback

regarding reductions in the amounts of pollutants associated with specific sources resulting from the

implementation or enhancement of a BMP. If a large enough portion of the target audience is moved

to take action (Level 3), loads into the MS4 are prevented. At Level 4, programs collect data to allow

estimation of loads from pollutant sources that are prevented from being either generated or

discharged into the MS4.

Level 5 – Improving runoff quality. Level 5 Outcomes may be measured as reductions in one or

more specific pollutants, and may reflect effectiveness at a variety of scales ranging from site-

specific to programmatic. Over time, as loads are prevented from entering the MS4, urban runoff

and discharge quality are expected to improve. At Level 5, baseline measurements of runoff quality

should be measured to allow comparison. Multi-year data sets are needed to have any confidence in

the measured change.

Level 6 – Protecting receiving water quality. At Level 6, program managers will focus on Outcomes

such as compliance with water quality standards, protection of biological integrity, and beneficial

use attainment. Regardless of the outcomes targeted, receiving water quality usually reflects more

than the quality of MS4 discharges. Other influences may have a significant impact on receiving

water quality, including sanitary sewer overflows, rising groundwater, agricultural and other non-

point source discharges. Changes in receiving waters and the environment resulting from stormwater

programs may only be seen over long periods of time that allow the cumulative impacts of multiple

control measures and program elements to result in measurable change in water quality.

The programmatic effectiveness assessment document was included as a revision in the DAMP in

FY 2012-2013. The new annual reporting forms utilized in this FY Annual Report contain the

quantification of certain program elements based on the effectiveness assessment criteria in the

DAMP. These are based upon the above CASQA effectiveness levels.



Effectiveness Assessment and Reporting

Section XVII.A of the 2010 MS4 Permit requires the Permittees to evaluate the effectiveness of the

Urban Runoff Management Program described in the DAMP to determine the need for any revisions

in order to reduce pollutants in MS4 discharges consistent with the MEP standard consistent with the

reporting requirements in Appendix 3, Section IV.B of the 2010 MS4 Permit.

The Permittees were required to develop a proposal for assessment of the Urban Runoff Management

Program effectiveness on an area-wide as well as jurisdiction-specific basis. Permittees utilized the

CASQA Guidance for developing these assessment measures at the six outcome levels. The

assessment measures targeted both water quality outcomes and the results of municipal enforcement

activities consistent with the requirements of Appendix 3, Section IV.B.

The following is the SAR MS4 Permittee's assessment summaries, as required and formatted under

Appendix 3 Section IV.B.2 of the 2010 SAR MS4 Permit. The progress and accomplishments of the

SAR stormwater management program are described in the Annual Report, as are recommendations

going forward.

Overall Program Assessment

The Permittee's summary of the effectiveness of implementing the DAMP is outlined in the tables

below. The information in the tables below summarize the metrics collected, the requirements of the

2010 MS4 Permit addressed by the metric, and their associated outcome levels. The data collected

for each of the measureable metrics are identified in the tables for each program and are required per

the DAMP (see DAMP Appendix O). Each measureable metric in the tables is reported in the SAR

Annual Report and assessed periodically. However, in reviewing the individual Permittee reports,

the degree of variance between the individual reports suggests significantly differing perspectives

between the Permittees, including interpretations of needed data. The Permittees recommend to the

Regional Board, the development of an alternative assessment.

Assessment of the effectiveness of BMPs established under the IC/ID program and the DAMP. The

effectiveness may be measured in terms of how successful the program has been in eliminating

IC/IDs and/or reducing pollutant loads in urban storm water runoff, including summaries of

Permittee actions to investigate and eliminate or permit IC/IDs and measures to reduce and/or

eliminate the discharge of Pollutants, including trash and debris.

As described in Table 13-1 below, 292 IC/ID reports were received from the public and Permittee

staff. Of these reported IC/IDs, two exceeded criteria that required follow-up and 18 required formal

enforcement response. Based on these metrics, it appears that the IC/ID programs implemented by

the Permittees in the SAR and described below are effective in protecting water quality.



The DAMP describes the discharge limitations and prohibitions applicable to the Co-Permittees MS4

(Section 4.1), non-prohibited Non-Stormwater discharges (Section 4.2), Procedures to Track Illegal

Discharges to their Sources (Section 4.3), IDDE Resources (4.4), IC/ID Prevention (4.5), IC/ID

Detection and Elimination (Section 4.6), IC/ID Response and Reporting (Section 4.7), Enforcement

for IC/IDs (Section 4.8), Litter Control (Section 4.9), Sanitary Wastes (Section 4.10), and Waste

Collection programs (Section 4.11).

IC/IDs to the Co-Permittees MS4 facilities are detected and investigated through a combination of

programs and approaches targeted at a variety of the potential pollutant sources. Potential IC/IDs

involving the MS4 and the facilities, and sources tributary to them, are identified and investigated

through four types of activities. They are also identified and investigated as part of existing

Construction Site, and Industrial and Commercial Facility inspection programs. The four activities

currently used for detection of IC/ID are:

1. Dry Weather inspections;

2. Dry Season monitoring;

3. Third-party notifications; and

4. Business inspections (through the Compliance Assistance Program and Department of

Environmental Health inspections) through municipal facility inspections (IX).

The LIP provides a description of the programs and activities that the Permittees are implementing

to comply with the 2010 SAR MS4 Permit and to reduce pollutants in urban runoff to the MEP. The

LIP is the principal document that comprehensively translates the MS4 Permit requirements into

actions that the Permittees implement to manage water quality in the MS4. The Permittees LIP,

includes IC/ID Prevention (Section 4.1), IC/ID Detection and Elimination (Section 4.2), IC/ID

Response and Reporting (Section 4.3) and IC/ID Database (Section 4.4).

The CMP provides guidance and procedures for the monitoring efforts implemented to comply with

the County's three MS4 Permits. The CMP includes procedures for collection and analysis of water

quality samples at MS4 outfalls and receiving waters for a variety of constituents, as well as

coordinate monitoring efforts for regional monitoring programs, the LE/CL TMDL development,

and the MSAR TMDL development. Section 5 of the CMP supports the IC/ID Monitoring Program,

which includes the IC/ID reconnaissance and monitoring that is required for both storm event and

dry weather monitoring events at receiving waters, and is designed to be compatible with the "Illicit

Discharge, Detection, and Elimination Guidance Manual" (Center for Watershed Protection, 2004).



The SAR Permit requires that the Permittees effectively prohibit the discharge of non-exempted non-

stormwater into their MS4 facilities.

Table 13-1: Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Program Effectiveness

Measureable Metrics Collected Data CASQA

Outcome Level

Number of IC/ID reports received (IX.A) 973 Level 1

Percentage of IC/IDs that were sampled that exceeded criteria and required follow-up (IX.A).

See Permittee Report

Number of IC/IDs that were sampled that exceeded criteria and required follow-up (IX.A).

2 Level 5

Percent of enforcement actions that reached each level of enforcement (IX.C)


Number of enforcement actions that reached each level of enforcement (IX.C)

Education and information: 28 Verbal warning: 29 Written warning: 20 Notice of violation or noncompliance: 50 Administrative fine: 7

Level 3

Estimated volume of anthropogenic trash removed from Permittee MS4 facilities (tons) (IX.J)

15,586 tons Level 4



PERMITTEE FACILITIES AND ACTIVITIES PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS ASSESSMENT

Table 13- 2: Permittee Facilities and Activities Program Effectiveness


Outcome Level

Percent of Permittee facilities with appropriate BMPs identified (IV.B)


Number of Permittee facilities with appropriate BMPs identified (IV.B)

81 Level 2

Percent of annual facility inspections that require follow-up actions (IV.C)


Number of annual facility inspections that require follow-up actions (IV.C)

12 Level 3

Average percent of follow-up actions identified in the previous year's Permittee facility inspections that were addressed (XIV.C)


number of follow-up actions identified in the previous year's Permittee facility inspections that were addressed (XIV.C)

3 Level 3

Estimated tons of Waste removed by Permittee street sweeping (XIV.D & XIV.E)

13,280 Level 4

Estimated tons of Waste removed from Permittee Open Channels (XIV.D & XIV.E)

3,436 Level 4

Estimated tons of Waste removed from Permittee storm drain inlets (XIV.D & XIV.E)

1,442 Level 4

The Permittee Facilities and Activities Program have been effective in promoting implementation of

appropriate BMPs in Permittee facilities and ensuring that the BMPs are inspected and maintained.

The program has also been effective in removing waste and properly disposing of waste from

Permittee streets and MS4 facilities.



DEVELOPMENT PLANNING EFFECTIVENESS ASSESSMENT

Table 13-3: Development Planning Program Effectiveness

Measureable Metric Collected Data CASQA Outcome

Level

Number of acres of Significant Redevelopment projects that incorporated LID-based BMPs that are built and completed (XII.D.2.a)

3092 Level 5

Number of applicable planning staff that attended WQMP training (XV)

30 Level 1

Number of post construction BMPs properly maintained and operated (XII.K.5)

1,100 Level 3

Construction activity is slowly increasing. Most of the residential development activities consisted

of resumption of projects initiated prior to the recession, so the level of grading activities remains

limited. As reflected in the table, the program is continuing to train Planning staff to ensure that new

development and significant redevelopment projects are in compliance with the Development

Planning Program. Also, the program has been maintaining and operating 1,100 post construction

BMPs.



PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY EFFECTIVENESS ASSESSMENT

Table 13-4: Private Development Construction Activity Program Effectiveness


Outcome Level

Percent of enforcement actions that reached each level of enforcement (XI.A.10)


Number of enforcement actions that reached each level of enforcement (XI.A.10)

Education and information: 660 Verbal warning: 141 Written warning: 179 Notice of violation or noncompliance: 13 Administrative compliance order: 0 Stop work order or cease and desist order: 5 Civil citation or injunction: 0 Administrative fine: 0

Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): 0

Level 3

Percent of active construction sites subject to Construction General Permit that are discovered without coverage ((XII.A.1)


Number of active construction sites subject to Construction General Permit that are discovered without coverage ((XII.A.1)

1 Level 2

Number of illegal construction sites that are discovered (i.e., without building/grading permits) (XI.B.3.a)

.8 Level 3

Number of construction inspection staff that attended Construction training (XV)

78 Level 1

As reflected in Table 13-4, the Private Construction program has been effective in educating the

development community of the requirement to obtain building and grading permits and to obtain

coverage under the Construction General Permit. Also, the program has been effective in providing

Construction training to Co-Permittee construction inspection staff, prior to the wet weather season,

to ensure that private development projects are properly operated and maintained.



INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL SOURCES EFFECTIVENESS ASSESSMENT

Table 13-5: Industrial and Commercial Sources Program Effectiveness


Outcome Level

Percent of enforcement actions that reached each level of enforcement (XI.A.10)


Number of enforcement actions that reached each level of enforcement (XI.A.10)

Education and information: 3,031 Verbal warning: 937 Written warning: 30 Notice of violation or noncompliance: 0 Administrative compliance order: 0 Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0 Civil citation or injunction: 0 Administrative fine: 0 Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): 0

Level 3

Percent of active industrial sites subject to Industrial General Permit that are discovered without coverage (XI.A.4)


Number of active industrial sites subject to Industrial General Permit that are discovered without coverage (XI.A.4)

86 Level 2

Number of new/undocumented Industrial and Commercial facilities added to database (XI.C, XI.C.4)

777 Level 1

Number of applicable Industrial & Commercial Facility inspection staff that attended Industrial-Commercial training (XV)

93 Level 1

The Permittees continue to implement an effective Industrial and Commercial Sources program.

Inspection staff effectively communicated compliance expectations with facility operators, and no

facility required a formal enforcement action. To promote continued effectiveness of this program,

facility inspection staff receives training. To assist the Permittees with the requirements for

Industrial and Commercial facilities, the training material is reviewed and updated as necessary.



RESIDENTIAL SOURCES EFFECTIVENESS ASSESSMENT

Table 13-6: Residential Sources Program Effectiveness

Measureable Metrics Collected Data CASQA Outcome

Level

Gallons of used oil collected at collection events (XI.E.3)

13,566 gallons Level 4

Total pounds collected at HHW/ABOP events (XI.E.3)

264,312 lbs Level 4

Total number of participants at HHW/ABOP events (XI.E.3)

5,342 Level 3

Percent of residences in Permittee jurisdiction subjected to enforcement beyond verbal/written warnings


Number of residences in Permittee jurisdiction subjected to enforcement beyond verbal/written warnings

Education and information:272 Verbal Warning: 51 Written warning:128 Notice of violation or noncompliance: 72 Administrative compliance order: 7 Stop work order or cease and desist order: 3 Civil citation or injunction: 3 Administrative fine: 0 Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): 0

Level 3

The Residential Sources Program continues to be effective in promoting proper disposal of waste

materials that may potentially impact receiving water quality. This is reflected in the amount of used

oil and waste collected at HHW/ABOP events. Eighty-five (85) residences in the Santa Ana Region

required enforcement actions beyond verbal/written warnings during the 2015-2016 reporting year.



PUBLIC EDUCATION EFFECTIVENESS ASSESSMENT

The Santa Ana River Clean-Up event was a very successful public education event with over nine

tons of trash collected. Most of the material collected from the event is non-anthropogenic; trash

does not appear to be a significant problem except at localized areas due to transient encampments.

This event is categorized as a CASQA Effectiveness Level 3 as it is changing behavior. An

Agreement was executed in FY 15-16, with the Public Education Consultant, but a Task Order was

not put in place due to difficulty meeting the contract requirements. The schools and business

outreach portions of the program have been delayed.