1

2014 Air Quality Progress Report for

Harlow Council

In fulfillment of Part IV of the Environment Act 1995

Local Air Quality Management

April 2014

2

Local Authority Officer

Stuart Athol

Department Environmental Health Services

Address

Harlow Council Civic Centre The Water Gardens Harlow CM20 1WG

Telephone 01279 446104 e-mail stuart.athol@harlow.gov.uk

Report Reference number

HAR/PR2014

Date 17th April 2014

Written by Tim Savage

Approved by Gary Lewis

Scientific Team Public Health & Protection Services Chelmsford City Council Duke Street Chelmsford Essex Cm1 1JE

3

Executive Summary

The 2014 Progress Report is designed to fulfil Harlow Councils statutory duty to review and assess air quality within its area, and to determine whether or not the air quality objectives are likely to be achieved. Air Quality within AQMAs Harlow Council has no Air Quality Management Areas Air Quality outside AQMAs Non-automatic monitoring has indicated no exceedences of the nitrogen dioxide annual mean air quality objective of 40µg/m3 in 2013 at relevant exposure within the Harlow Council area. This report confirms that there is no requirement to conduct a Detailed Assessment for any pollutant and the next round of reporting will be the USA which will be delivered in April 2015.

4

Table of Contents

1 Introduction 6

1.1 Description of Local Authority Area 6

1.2 Purpose of Progress Report 6

1.3 Air Quality Objectives 7

1.4 Summary of Previous Review and Assessments 8

2 New Monitoring Data 9

2.1 Summary of Monitoring Undertaken 9

2.2 Comparison of Monitoring Results with Air Quality Objectives 12

3 New Local Developments 16

4 Local / Regional Air Quality Strategy 17

5 Air Quality Planning Policies 18

6 Local Transport Plans and Strategies 19

7 Climate Change Strategies 20

8 Conclusions and Proposed Actions 21

8.1 Conclusions from New Monitoring Data 21

8.2 Proposed Actions 21

9 References 22

10 Appendices 23

5

List of Tables

Table 1.1 Air Quality Objectives included in Regulations for the purpose of LAQM in England.

Table 1.2 Summary of Previous Reviews and Assessment

Table 2.1 Details of Non-Automatic Monitoring Sites

Table 2.2 Results of NO2 diffusion tubes 2013

Table 2.3 Results of NO2 diffusion tubes 2008 to 2013

Table A.1 2013 National bias adjustment factor

Table A.2 WASP NO2 Proficiency Testing Scheme for Rounds 120-123

Table A.3 Bias Adjustment calculations for diffusion tubes for Harlow District 2013

Table A.4 Harlow Council raw diffusion tube data 2013

Table A.5 List of Permitted Processes in the Harlow District

List of Figures

Figure 2.1 Harlow Council diffusion tube locations in 2013

Figure 2.2 Trends in Annual Mean NO2 concentrations measured at diffusion tube monitoring sites 2008-2013

Appendices

Appendix 1 QA/QC Data

Appendix 2 Harlow Council Raw Diffusion Tube Data 2013

Appendix 3 Permitted Processes in the Harlow District

6

1 Introduction

1.1 Description of Local Authority Area

The District of Harlow is located in west of Essex. It is a ‘new’ town and the area forms part of the London commuter belt.

The total area covered by the Council is just over 30km2, with a population of 81,900 (ONS, 2011).The main employment in the area is service related, although there is some industry, mainly located at Templefields to the north and the Pinnacles to the northwest. The town has two railway stations (on the West Anglia main line) and is near the M11 motorway for access to London and the rest of the country. Harlow also has one of the most extensive cycle track networks in the country, connecting the town centre and industrial areas. The town centre and many of its neighbourhood shopping facilities have, in recent years, undergone major redevelopment, and many of the original town buildings and industrial units have been rebuilt. There are 34 minor industrial processes that are regulated by the Council. Most of which are located in the two main industrial areas in the town, Templefields (to the North), and the Pinnacles (to the Northwest). Traffic emissions are the most significant source of air pollution in Harlow. The main roads in the District are the M11 and the A414.

1.2 Purpose of Progress Report

This report fulfils the requirements of the Local Air Quality Management (LAQM) process as set out in Part IV of the Environment Act (1995), the Air Quality Strategy for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland 2007 and the relevant Policy and Technical Guidance documents. The LAQM process places an obligation on all local authorities to regularly review and assess air quality in their areas, and to determine whether or not the air quality objectives are likely to be achieved. Where exceedences are considered likely, the local authority must then declare an Air Quality Management Area (AQMA) and prepare an Air Quality Action Plan (AQAP) setting out the measures it intends to put in place in pursuit of the objectives. Progress Reports are required in the intervening years between the three-yearly Updating and Screening Assessment reports. Their purpose is to maintain continuity in the Local Air Quality Management process. They are not intended to be as detailed as Updating and Screening Assessment Reports, or to require as much effort. However, if the Progress Report identifies the risk of exceedence of an Air Quality Objective, then the Local Authority (LA) should undertake a Detailed Assessment immediately, and not wait until the next round of Review and Assessment.

7

1.3 Air Quality Objectives

The air quality objectives applicable to LAQM in England are set out in the Air Quality (England) Regulations 2000 (SI 928), The Air Quality (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2002 (SI 3043), and are shown in Table 1.1. This table shows the objectives in units of microgrammes per cubic metre µg/m3 (milligrammes per cubic metre, mg/m3 for carbon monoxide) with the number of exceedences in each year that are permitted (where applicable).

Table 1.1 Air Quality Objectives included in Regulations for the purpose of LAQM in England

Pollutant Air Quality Objective Date to be

achieved by Concentration Measured as

Benzene 16.25 µg/m3 Running annual

mean 31.12.2003

5.00 µg/m3 Annual mean 31.12.2010

1,3-Butadiene 2.25 µg/m3 Running annual

mean 31.12.2003

Carbon monoxide 10 mg/m3 Running 8-hour

mean 31.12.2003

Lead 0.50 µg/m3 Annual mean 31.12.2004

0.25 µg/m3 Annual mean 31.12.2008

Nitrogen dioxide

200 µg/m3not to be exceeded more than 18 times a

year

1-hour mean 31.12.2005

40 µg/m3 Annual mean 31.12.2005

Particulate Matter (PM10)

(gravimetric)

50 µg/m3, not to be exceeded more than 35 times a

year

24-hour mean 31.12.2004

40 µg/m3 Annual mean 31.12.2004

Sulphur dioxide

350 µg/m3, not to be exceeded more

than 24 times a year

1-hour mean 31.12.2004

125 µg/m3, not to be exceeded more than 3 times a year

24-hour mean 31.12.2004

266 µg/m3, not to be exceeded more

than 35 times a year

15-minute mean 31.12.2005

8

1.4 Summary of Previous Review and Assessments

Table 1.2 Summary of Previous Reviews and Assessment

Round Date Review Type Summary

2

2004 2005

Progress Report Progress Report

The Progress Report identified that air quality objectives would be met for all pollutants and that a Detailed Assessment would not be required The Progress Report identified that air quality objectives would be met for all pollutants and that a Detailed Assessment would not be required

3

2006 2007 2008

USA Progress Report Progress Report

The USA identified that air quality objectives would be met for all pollutants and that a Detailed Assessment would not be required The Progress Report identified that air quality objectives would be met for all pollutants and that a Detailed Assessment would not be required The Progress Report identified that air quality objectives would be met for all pollutants and that a Detailed Assessment would not be required

4

2009 2010 2011

USA Progress Report Progress Report

The USA identified that air quality objectives would be met for all pollutants and that a Detailed Assessment would not be required The Progress Report identified that air quality objectives would be met for all pollutants and that a Detailed Assessment would not be required The Progress Report identified that air quality objectives would be met for all pollutants and that a Detailed Assessment would not be required

5

2012 2013

USA Progress Report

The USA identified that air quality objectives would be met for all pollutants and that a Detailed Assessment would not be required The Progress Report identified that air quality objectives would be met for all pollutants and that a Detailed Assessment would not be required

9

2 New Monitoring Data

2.1 Summary of Monitoring Undertaken

2.1.1 Automatic Monitoring Sites

Harlow Council currently has no Automatic Monitoring Sites.

2.1.2 Non-Automatic Monitoring Sites

Harlow Council undertook monitoring at 5 NO2 diffusion tubes sites in 2013. The locations are shown in figure 2.1. Details are presented in table 2.1. Raw monthly mean data for 2013 can be found in Appendix 2.

The diffusion tubes for 2013 were supplied and analysed by Gradko International (UKAS Testing Laboratory number 2187) with a preparation method of 20% triethanolamine (TEA) in water.

The bias adjustment factor of 0.95 is used and is taken from the DEFRA national bias adjustment spreadsheet (03/14 v2) for Gradko (20% TEA in water) which is based on 24 studies.

The national bias adjustment factor has been used as there are no local co-location studies that can be used to develop a local bias adjustment factor.

10

Figure 2.1 Harlow Council diffusion tube locations in 2013

Based upon the Ordnance Survey mapping with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office (c) Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Chelmsford CC Licence No. 100023562 2013

11

Table 2.1 Details of Non-Automatic Monitoring Sites

Site ID Site Name Site Type X OS Grid Reference

Y OS Grid Reference

Pollutant monitored

In AQMA? Relevant

Exposure? (m)

Distance to kerb of nearest road (m)

Does this Location

Represent Worst-Case Exposure?

HAR 8 East Park Roadside 546942 211186 NO2 No Yes – 15 25 No

HAR 9 Gardiners Roadside 546888 209435 NO2 No Yes – 7 1 Yes

HAR10 Dads Wood Roadside 544434 209709 NO2 No Yes – 0 30 No

HAR11 Town Centre Roadside 544680 210016 NO2 No No N/A Yes

HAR12 Allende Avenue Roadside 544396 211101 NO2 No No 6 Yes

12

2.2 Comparison of Monitoring Results with Air Quality Objectives

2.2.1 Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) Diffusion Tube Monitoring Data

The data shown in Table 2.2 below shows that all monitoring results were within the 40 µg/m3 Air Quality Objective for Nitrogen Dioxide.

Table 2.2 Results of NO2 diffusion tubes 2013

Site No. Location Within AQMA? Data Capture 2013

(%)

Annual mean

concentrations (µµµµg/m3) 2013 (Bias Adjustment Factor =

0.95)

HAR 8 East Park No 100.00 27.67

HAR 9 Gardiners No 100.00 28.28

HAR10 Dads Wood No 100.00 29.78

HAR11 Town Centre No 100.00 33.02

HAR12 Allende Avenue No 91.67 29.92

13

Table 2.3 Results of NO2 diffusion tubes 2008-2013

Site ID Location Within

AQMA?

Annual Mean Concentration (µg/m3) - Adjusted for Bias

2008 (Bias

Adjustment Factor = 0.80)

2009 (Bias

Adjustment Factor = 0.82)

2010 (Bias

Adjustment Factor = 0.85)

2011 (Bias

Adjustment Factor = 0.84)

2012 (Bias

Adjustment Factor = 0.97)

2013 (Bias

Adjustment Factor = 0.95)

HAR 1 London Road No 32.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

HAR 2 Potter Street No 32.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A

HAR 3 Purford Green No 21 N/A N/A N/A N/A

HAR 4 Hawkenbury No 27.9 25.2 28.4 N/A N/A N/A

HAR 5 AQMS 1 No 31.2 30.3 33.7 N/A N/A N/A

HAR 6 AQMS 2 No 31.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

HAR 7 AQMS 3 No 30.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

HAR 8 East Park No 34.2 32.3 30.7 29.92 31.42 27.67 HAR 9 The Gardiners No 33.5 32.7 31.4 32.42 33.6 28.28 HAR 10 Dads Wood No N/A N/A N/A 32.88 32.68 29.78 HAR 11 Town Centre No N/A N/A N/A 37.43 38.8 33.02

HAR 12 Allende Avenue

No N/A N/A N/A 43.18 32.76 29.92

HAR 1 / HAR 2 & HAR 3 were discontinued in 2008

HAR 4 & HAR 5 were discontinued in 2010

HAR 6 & HAR 7 were discontinued in 2008

HAR 10 / HAR 11 & HAR 12 were new locations in 2011

14

Figure 2.2 Trends in Annual Mean NO2 Concentrations measured at diffusion tube monitoring sites 2008-2013

20

25

30

35

40

45

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Annual M

ean C

oncentr

ation (

µg/m

3)

-A

dju

ste

d for

Bia

s

HAR 8

HAR 9

HAR 10

HAR 11

HAR 12

15

2.2.2 Particulate Matter (PM10)

Harlow Council does not currently monitor PM10 levels.

2.2.3 Sulphur Dioxide (SO2)

Harlow does not currently monitor Sulphur Dioxide levels.

2.2.4 Benzene

Harlow Council does not currently monitor Benzene levels.

2.2.5 Other Pollutants Monitored

Harlow Council does not currently monitor any other pollutants.

2.2.6 Summary of Compliance with AQS Objectives

Harlow Council has examined the results from monitoring in the district. Concentrations at relevant locations are below the objectives, therefore there is no need to proceed with a Detailed Assessment.

16

3 New Local Developments

Harlow Council confirms that there are no new or newly identified local developments which may have an impact on Air Quality within the Local Authority area. Harlow District Council confirms that all the following have been considered:

• Road traffic sources

• Other transport sources

• Industrial sources

• Commercial and domestic sources

• New developments with fugitive or uncontrolled sources.

17

4 Local / Regional Air Quality Strategy

In 1995, as a result of the Government publication "Meeting the Challenge" and the aspirations of local government to undertake more local air quality work in Essex, the Essex Air Quality Consortium was formed.

Consisting of all Local Authorities in Essex, Essex County Council, the Environment Agency, London Stansted Airport and the University of Essex, the purpose of the Essex Air Quality Consortium is to promote improvements in air quality related issues.

Members of the Essex Air Quality Consortium meet on a quarterly basis to discuss common air quality issues, share experiences and best practice in carrying out their duties locally. The partnership provides assistance to all members regarding their obligations under current UK Air Quality legislation.

Air pollution does not respect Council boundaries and in Essex the Local Authorities are varied in size and population. Effective options for individual Councils can be limited so the Essex Authorities have agreed to work in partnership with each other to seek joint solutions to air pollution problems.

The Essex Air Quality Consortium has been able to represent the people of Essex at a regional and national level through Air Quality Events and Meetings. The group have been able to offer its views and comments on current air quality requirements and any future consultations being considered.

The profile of Air Quality in Essex is changing and is becoming more challenging. Due to the declaration of an increasing number of Air Quality Management Areas (AQMAs) and as a result of increased traffic growth and congestion, the Consortium is working much more closely with the Local Transport Authority in Essex County Council to seek improvements to Air Quality where possible

18

5 Air Quality Planning Policies

Harlow Council’s Adopted Replacement Local Plan (2006) contains a statement relating to the environmental protection of the District. In particular, Policy Statement BE 18 states that: ‘Planning permission will be granted if a development does not have the potential to contribute to significant levels of air pollution or is not sensitive to the effect of existing sources of air pollution or if adequate provision is made to mitigate against adverse effects on Air Quality.’

19

6 Local Transport Plans and Strategies

Harlow is covered by the Essex County Council Local Transport Plan (LTP). There are a number of general measures in the Essex LTP which are aimed at reducing the impact of road transport on Air Quality. Harlow forms part of the ‘West Essex Area’ along with neighbouring Epping Forest and Uttlesford District councils. The Council is working in partnership with the Environment, Sustainability and Highways department at Essex County Council to ensure that new traffic management schemes consider the potential impact on Air Quality.

20

7 Climate Change Strategies

Harlow Council recognises the importance of reducing energy usage in both its own operations and across the district. The Council is continually working towards reducing its own carbon footprint and encouraging residents and local businesses to do the same. The Council's current Carbon Management Plan covers the period to 2015/16 and includes a carbon emission reduction target of 25%. The district emissions for Harlow were measured by the Department for Energy and Climate Change until 2009. Harlow’s carbon emissions per capita up to 2009 are shown in the table below, these figures include emissions from industry and the commercial sector, domestic emissions and those from road transport.

Year Grand total Population ('000s, mid-year estimate) Per Capita Emissions (t)

2005 682 78 8.8

2006 672 78 8.6

2007 649 79 8.2

2008 639 80 8.0

2009 575 81 7.1

21

8 Conclusions and Proposed Actions

8.1 Conclusions from New Monitoring Data

The Progress Report shows that Harlow Council is meeting the Air Quality objectives currently and is not at risk of exceeding the objectives for Nitrogen Dioxide. The Council is working in partnership with key stakeholders to ensure that the Air Quality in Harlow remains below objective limits and continues to improve. Based on the findings of this Progress Report there is no obvious need for Harlow Council to carry out any Detailed Assessment of any Air Quality issues.

8.2 Proposed Actions

Proposed actions arising from the 2014 Progress Report are as follows:

• Progress to the Updating and Screening Assessment in 2015.

22

10 References

Harlow Council Reports:

• Harlow Council (2008) Local Air Quality Management – Progress Report 2008.

• Harlow Council (2009) Local Air Quality Management – Updating and Screening Assessment 2009.

• Harlow Council (2010) Local Air Quality Management – Progress Report 2010.

• Harlow Council (2011) Local Air Quality Management – Progress Report 2011.

• Harlow Council (2012) Local Air Quality Management – Updating and Screening Assessment 2012.

• Harlow Council (2013) Local Air Quality Management – Progress Report 2013.

• Harlow Council Adopted Replacement Local Plan (2006) available at http://www.harlow.gov.uk/arhlp

• Harlow Council Carbon Management Plan available at http://www.harlow.gov.uk/carbon

Guidance and LAQM tools:

• Local Air Quality Management Technical Guidance LAQM.TG (09). February 2009. Published by Defra in partnership with the Scottish Government, Welsh Assembly Government and Department of the Environment Northern Ireland.

• LAQM Helpdesk (2013) Summary of Laboratory Performance in WASP

NO2 Proficiency Testing Scheme for Rounds 117-124 available at

http://laqm.defra.gov.uk/documents/LAQM-WASP-Rounds-117-124-

(April-2012--March-2014)-NO2-report.pdf

• Defra (2014) National Diffusion Tube Bias Adjustment Factor

Spreadsheet (03/14 v2) available at

http://laqm.defra.gov.uk/documents/Database_Diffusion_Tube_Bias_Fact

ors-v03_14-Final-v2.xls

External Reports and Information:

• Essex County Council Local Transport Plan (LTP) 2011 available at http://www.essex.gov.uk/Environment%20Planning/Planning/Transport-planning/Documents/Essex_Transport_Strategy.pdf

23

Appendices

Appendix 1: Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA/QC) Data Diffusion tube bias adjustment factors Harlow Council undertook monitoring at 5 NO2 diffusion tubes sites in 2013.

• The diffusion tubes were supplied and analysed by Gradko International (UKAS Testing Laboratory number 2187) with a preparation method of 20% triethanolamine (TEA) in water.

Discussion of Choice of Bias Adjustment Factor The national bias adjustment factor has been used as there are no local co-location studies that can be used to develop a local bias adjustment factor. The factors have been taken from the Defra national bias adjustment spreadsheet (03/14 v2) based on the results of studies in 2013.

Table A.1 National bias adjustment factor

Laboratory Method Year

New (03/14) Factor

No. of Studies

Factor

Gradko International 20% TEA in

Water 2013 24 0.95

The bias adjustment factor of 0.95 was applied to the raw data.

QA/QC of diffusion tube monitoring The Workplace Analysis Scheme for Proficiency (WASP) is an independent analytical proficiency-testing (PT) scheme, operated by the Health and Safety Laboratory (HSL). WASP offers a number of test samples designed to test the proficiency of laboratories undertaking analysis of chemical pollutants in workplace and ambient air. One such sample is the WASP NO2 test sample type that is distributed to participants in a quarterly basis. The following table summarises laboratory performance in WASP NO2 Proficiency Testing Scheme for Rounds 120-123 which took place in 2013.

Table A.2 WASP NO2 Proficiency Testing Scheme for Rounds 120-123 WASP R120 WASP R121 WASP R122 WASP R123

Laboratory January to March 2013

April to June 2013

July to September 2013

October to December 2013

Gradko International 100% 100% 100% 100%

24

Table A.3 Bias Adjustment calculations for diffusion tubes for Harlow District 2013

Site ID Address 2013 Mean

Concentration (µg/m3)

2013 Mean Concentrations

(µg/m3)After Bias Adjustment (0.95)

HW008 East Park 29.12 27.67 HW009 Gardiners 29.77 28.28 HW010 Dads Wood 31.35 29.78

HW011 Town Centre 34.76 33.02

HW012 Allende Avenue 31.49 29.92

25

Appendix 2: Harlow Council Raw Diffusion Tube Data 2013

Table A.4 Harlow Council raw diffusion tube data 2013 Site ID

Address Jan-13 Feb-13 Mar-13 Apr-13 May-13 Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 Sep-13 Oct-13 Nov-13 Dec-13

MD 8 East Park 41.76 29.5 28.03 25.95 23.92 20.4 19.11 24.79 28.34 30.45 37.40 39.82

MD 9 Gardiners 40.74 34.14 23.90 26.29 15.72 21.1 22.92 29.49 30.73 33.93 40.60 37.69

MD 10 Dads Wood 41.18 31.36 32.32 27.97 22.89 23.53 25.07 26.39 31.72 34.09 38.70 40.97

MD11 Town Centre 40.34 37.77 42.79 36.05 27.82 30.96 29.98 29.74 36.02 34.58 37.14 33.96

MD12 Allende Avenue

44.05 30.87 36.97 31.81 24.33 27.04 27.97 14.88 35.17 33.65 Missing 39.69

26

Appendix 3: Permitted Processes in Harlow District

Table A.5 List of Permitted Processes in the Harlow District

Name Address Postcode Work

Description Risk Rating

Ronacrete Ltd. Ronac House Flex Meadow Harlow

CM19 5TD Concrete Batching

Medium

O-I Manufacturing UK Ltd

Edinburgh Way, Harlow, Essex. CM20 2UG Manufacture of Glass

High

All Makes Autos

Sheild House, Elizabeth Way, Harlow

CM19 5AR Small Waste Oil Burner

Low

Cemex Ready Mix East Anglia Ltd.

Portacabin, Cemex, Temple Bank, Harlow, Essex.

CM20 2TT Concrete Batching

Low

DJ Sports cars

2 Edinburgh Place, Harlow CM20 2DJ Small Waste Oil Burner

Low

Aggregate Industries (UK) Ltd

Bardon Concrete, Harlow Mill Depot, Station Approach, Harlow, Essex.

CM20 2EL Concrete Batching

Low

Harlow Asphalt Ltd

Yeoman Asphalt, Harlow Mill Depot, Station Approach, Harlow, Essex.

CM20 2EL Roadstone Coating

High

R B Whitbread (Plant Hire) Ltd.

Crusher Site, Roydon Lea Farm, Harlow Road, Roydon, Essex.

CM19 5DU Mobile Concrete Crusher

Low

CPI Mortars 29 Mead Industrial Park, Riverway, Harlow, Essex.

CM20 2SE Concrete Batching

Low

Harlow Truck Centre

Brook House Riverway Harlow. CM20 2DW Small Waste Oil Burner

Low

B P Oil (UK) Ltd

BP Filling Station, Southern Way, Harlow, Essex.

CM18 7BH Petrol Station Low

Sainsbury Supermarkets Ltd

J Sainsbury Filling Station, Allende Avenue, Harlow, Essex.

CM20 2AG Petrol Station Low

Tesco Stores Ltd.

Tesco Filling Station, East Road, Harlow, Essex, CM20 2TG and Tesco Filling Station, Church Langely Way, Harlow, Essex.

CM17 9TE Petrol Station Low

27

Name Address Postcode Work

Description Risk Rating

Esso Ltd. Harlow Service Station, Tillwicks Road, Harlow, Essex.

CM18 6NQ Petrol Station Low

Texaco Ltd. Harlow Service Station, Elizabeth Way, Harlow Essex.

CM19 5AR Petrol Station Low

Esso Ltd Kitson Way, Harlow CM20 1DG Petrol Station Low

Esso Ltd Mill Hatch, Edinburgh Way, Harlow

CM20 2DG Petrol Station Low

Adams Motors 1-2 Francis Court, Elizabeth Way, Harlow

CM20 2JB Small Waste Oil Burner

Low

MOTs R Uz 30 South Road, Harlow CM20 2AR Small Waste Oil Burner

Medium

Old Harlow Launderette & Dry Cleaners

7 Garden Terrace Road Harlow Essex

CM17 0AT Dry Cleaner Low

Harlow Dry Cleaners

Harlow Dry Cleaners 14 The Stow Harlow Essex

CM20 3AH Dry Cleaner Low

Harlow Dry Cleaners

Harlow Dry Cleaners 3 Bush House Harlow Essex

CM18 6NS Dry Cleaner Low

Clean & Sew Clean & Sew Unit 1 Church Langley Way Harlow Essex.

CM17 9TE Dry Cleaner Medium

Hill Demolition and Skip Hire

1-3 Edinburgh Place, Temple Field Ind.Est. Harlow

CM20 2DJ Mobile Concrete Crusher

Medium

DWS (Harlow Ltd)

DWS (Harlow) Ltd. River Way. Harlow, Essex.

CM20 2ES Paint Re-sprayers

Medium

PPE Ltd Horsecroft Road The Pinnacles Harlow.

CM19 5BH Powder coating Installation.

Low

BMW Spares 16-17 Horsecroft Place The Pinnacles Harlow.

CM19 5BU Small Waste Oil Burner

Low

Parndon Wood Crematorium

Parndon Wood Road Harlow. CM19 4SF Cremation High Risk.

Medium

Burnt Mill Garage

28 Burnt Mill Elizabeth Way Harlow.

CM20 2HU Small Waste Oil Burner

Low

Idess (Retail) Ltd

3 West Road Harlow. CM20 2BQ Timber Cutting and Timber Coating Activities

Low

RJS Motors Unit 9 Harolds Road Harlow. CM19 5BJ Small Waste Oil Burner

Low

Harlow Motors Venture Hse, Perry Road, Harlow

CM18 7NF Small Waste Oil Burner

Low