Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2014 – 2015 OFFICIAL BUDGET
RICHARDSON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Where all students learn, grow and succeed.
RICHARDSON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Richardson, Texas
ANNUAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR
From July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2015
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Karen Holburn, President
Justin Bono
Kim Caston
Lanet Greenhaw
Kristin Kuhne
Adam Meierhofer
Kris Oliver
APPOINTED OFFICIALS
Dr. Kay Waggoner, Superintendent Patti Kieker, Deputy Superintendent
Tony Harkleroad, Deputy Superintendent, Finance and Support Services Bob DeVoll, Assistant Superintendent, Secondary Schools
Dr. Chris Goodson, Assistant Superintendent, Elementary Schools Dr. Fernando Medina, Assistant Superintendent, Human Resources
Sandra Hayes, Assistant Superintendent, Technology Mia Martin, General Counsel
Candace Ahlfinger, Executive Director, Communications and Public Affairs
For questions regarding budget or financial information, contact: Tony Harkleroad, Deputy Superintendent, Finance and Support Services
469.593.0331
Table of Contents
Superintendent’s Budget Message ....................................................................... 1
Legal Notice of Budget Hearing ............................................................................ 2
Budget and Tax Rate Adoption Calendar ............................................................. 3
Budget Overview................................................................................................... 4
Financial Forecasts ............................................................................................... 5
Employee Compensation .................................................................................... 12
Official Budget..................................................................................................... 15
Operating Fund ................................................................................................... 21
Child Nutrition Fund ............................................................................................ 24
Debt Service Fund .............................................................................................. 26
Miscellaneous Statistics and Analysis ................................................................. 29
1
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS BUDGET AND PROPOSED TAX RATE
The Richardson Independent School District will hold a public meeting at 6:30pm, June 16, 2014 in the Auditorium at 400 S Greenville Ave, Richardson TX 75081. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss the school district's budget that will determine the tax rate that will be adopted. Public participation in the discussion is invited. The tax rate that is ultimately adopted at this meeting or at a separate meeting at a later date may not exceed the proposed rate shown below unless the district publishes a revised notice containing the same information and comparisons set out below and holds another public meeting to discuss the revised notice.
Maintenance Tax $1.040050/$100 (proposed rate for maintenance and operations) School Debt Service Tax Approved by Local Voters $0.300000/$100 (proposed rate to pay bonded indebtedness)
Comparison of Proposed Budget with Last Year's Budget The applicable percentage increase or decrease (or difference) in the amount budgeted in the preceding fiscal year and the amount budgeted for the fiscal year that begins during the current tax year is indicated for each of the following expenditure categories.
Maintenance and operations 4.01 % increase
Debt Service 4.32 % increase
Total expenditures 4.05 % increase
Total Appraised Value and Total Taxable Value (as calculated under Section 26.04, Tax Code)
Preceding Tax Year Current Tax Year
Total appraised value* of all property $20,476,002,780 $20,058,890,911 Total appraised value* of new property** $100,369,258 $157,345,949 Total taxable value*** of all property $17,354,215,956 $17,023,572,244 Total taxable value*** of new property** $100,369,258 $157,345,949 *Appraised value is the amount shown on the appraisal roll and defined by Section 1.04(8), Tax Code. ** "New property" is defined by Section 26.012(17), Tax Code. *** "Taxable value" is defined by Section 1.04(10), Tax Code.
Bonded Indebtedness Total amount of outstanding and unpaid bonded indebtedness* $430,134,987
*Outstanding principal. Comparison of Proposed Rates with Last Year's Rates
Maintenance & Operations
Interest & Sinking Fund*
Total
Local Revenue Per Student
State Revenue Per Student
Last Year's Rate $1.040050 $0.300000* $1.340050 $6,408 $2,666 Rate to Maintain Same Level of Maintenance & Operations Revenue & Pay Debt Service $1.041980 $0.300000* $1.341980 $6,360 $2,533
Proposed Rate $1.040050 $0.300000* $1.340050 $6,351 $2,533 *The Interest & Sinking Fund tax revenue is used to pay for bonded indebtedness on construction, equipment, or both. The bonds, and the tax rate necessary to pay those bonds, were approved by the voters of this district.
Comparison of Proposed Levy with Last Year's Levy on Average Residence
Last Year This Year Average Market Value of Residences $205,938 $206,135 Average Taxable Value of Residences $170,345 $170,522 Last Year's Rate Versus Proposed Rate per $100 Value $1.340050 $1.340050 Taxes Due on Average Residence $2,282.71 $2,285.08 Increase (Decrease) in Taxes
$2.37
Under state law, the dollar amount of school taxes imposed on the residence homestead of a person 65 years of age or older or of the surviving spouse of such a person, if the surviving spouse was 55 years of age or older when the person died, may not be increased above the amount paid in the first year after the person turned 65, regardless of changes in tax rate or property value. Notice of Rollback Rate: The highest tax rate the district can adopt before requiring voter approval at an election is $1.340067. This election will be automatically held if the district adopts a rate in excess of the rollback rate of $1.340067.
Fund Balances The following estimated balances will remain at the end of the current fiscal year and are not encumbered with or by a corresponding debt obligation, less estimated funds necessary for operating the district before receipt of the first state aid payment. Maintenance and Operations Fund Balance(s) $79,899,848 Interest & Sinking Fund Balance(s) $15,464,103
2
2014-15 Budget and Tax Rate Adoption Calendar September, 2013 through June, 2014 - Ongoing budget status meetings with the Superintendent and Superintendent’s Council. September, 2013 through June, 2014 - Board of Trustee legislative, alternative funding, bond and budget status monthly reports. October 7 - Board of Trustee Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas hearing and discussion. November, 2013 through May, 2014 - Board of Trustee Budget Committee meetings to review budget proposals/projections and provide input to staff. November 4 - Board of Trustee acceptance of Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. December 2 – Board of Trustee budget discussion. January 13 - Board of Trustee budget and demographic update discussion. February 3 - Board of Trustee follow up demographic update discussion. March 4 – Distributed additional demographic data requested by the Board of Trustees. April 21 – Budget Review Team meeting to discuss budget and compensation (normally occurs in February, but was delayed until 2014-15 budget priorities were finalized). April 30 - Dallas Central Appraisal District certifies and delivers estimated appraisal roll. First week of May - Discussions with Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s rating agencies (reported to the Board of Trustees). May 5 - Board of Trustee budget discussion. June 2 - Board of Trustee budget discussion. June 16 - Board of Trustee meeting and public hearing on the 2014–15 proposed budget and tax rate. Board of Trustee budget adoption, tax rate adoption, and approval of final end of year 2013-14 budget amendments, and acceptance of the preliminary estimated certified tax roll.
3
Richardson Independent School District 2014-15 Budget Overview
The District’s vision, mission, and goals are as follows: Vision: Where all students learn, grow and succeed. Mission: To serve and prepare all students for their global future Goals: Goal 1: Students are highly engaged in their educational life. Goal 2: Profound Curriculum is the foundation for learning. Goal 3: RISD has high performing, student focused teachers.
Goal 4: RISD ensures excellence in operations.
We believe that the budget process and proposed budget support our Vision, Mission, and Goals by evaluating available resources and focusing them on these issues. The district is required to adopt budgets for the General or Operating Fund, Child Nutrition Fund, and Debt Service Fund. Discussions in the Budget Overview will focus on the Operating Fund unless noted otherwise as this is the primary fund for the district and is the only fund currently subject to limitations from the school finance system and wealth equalization. The district faces a number of financial challenges and has developed a variety of strategies to address them, including: • A comprehensive multi-year financial plan, • Annual analysis of peer district comparative financial data, • Engaged stakeholder groups in the budget process, • Interaction with Superintendent and the Board of Trustees (see adoption calendar for details)
regarding budget throughout the year. The multi-year financial plan allows staff to be more proactive versus reactive regarding anticipated revenues, expenses, and fund balance. The current multi-year financial plan, including assumptions for enrollment, taxable values, revenues, expenses, and fund balance is as follows:
4
Exec
utiv
e Su
mm
ary
2013
-201
420
14-2
015
2015
-201
620
16-2
017
2017
-201
820
18-2
019
Tota
l Pro
ject
ed R
even
ue27
7,07
8,76
6
287,
604,
496
28
7,66
8,37
3
291,
019,
559
29
3,52
0,68
7
296,
043,
613
Tota
l Pro
ject
ed E
xpen
ditu
res
274,
331,
181
28
4,49
8,46
5
288,
701,
925
29
2,18
1,31
6
295,
436,
118
29
8,21
5,82
4
Tota
l Pro
ject
ed R
ecap
ture
-
-
-
-
-
-
Pro
ject
ed S
alar
y In
crea
ses
10,0
93,2
05
6,
025,
923
4,00
0,00
0
4,
000,
000
4,00
0,00
0
4,
000,
000
Pro
ject
ed N
ew S
taff
Allo
catio
ns7,
075,
000
2,79
8,18
8
1,
000,
000
750,
000
50
0,00
0
-
Pro
ject
ed O
ther
Adj
ustm
ents
3,52
3,35
2
1,
343,
173
(796
,540
)
(1,2
70,6
09)
(1,2
45,1
97)
(1,2
20,2
93)
(in
clud
es s
avin
gs fr
om o
pen
posi
tions
/turn
over
, pr
ojec
ted
cost
incr
ease
s fo
r fue
l, ut
ilitie
s, e
tc.)
Red
uctio
ns/(I
ncre
ases
) Nee
ded
to M
aint
ain
Bal
ance
d B
udge
t(2
,747
,585
)
(3
,106
,031
)
1,
033,
553
1,16
1,75
7
1,
915,
431
2,17
2,21
1
End
ing
Fund
Bal
ance
ass
umin
g no
redu
ctio
ns
are
gene
rate
d to
offs
et p
roje
cted
def
icits
79,8
99,8
48
82
,005
,879
79,9
72,3
26
77
,810
,569
74,8
95,1
38
71
,722
,927
Fu
nd B
alan
ce a
s a
% o
f exp
ense
s29
.13%
28.8
2%27
.70%
26.6
3%25
.35%
24.0
5%
Enr
ollm
ent u
sed
to c
alcu
late
reve
nue
38,2
8438
,623
39,0
8039
,695
40,1
5440
,617
2013
-14
enro
llmen
t fig
ure
is a
s of
the
final
fall P
EIM
S s
naps
hot s
ubm
issi
on a
nd s
ubse
quen
t yea
rs re
flect
pro
ject
ed e
nrol
lmen
t gro
wth
from
the
Janu
ary,
201
4, d
emog
raph
ic re
port.
Rev
enue
cal
cula
tions
not
ed a
bove
use
a 5
yea
r atte
ndan
ce a
vera
ge a
s op
pose
d to
the
3 ye
ar a
vera
ge in
prio
r ver
sion
s. T
his
resu
lts in
addi
tiona
l rev
enue
of $
682,
000
in 2
013-
14 a
nd $
693,
000
each
yea
r the
reaf
ter.
Tota
l bud
get i
ncre
ases
for 2
014-
15 e
qual
$10
,255
,284
. Not
e th
at to
tal r
ecur
ring
fund
s av
aila
ble
for 2
014-
15 w
ere
$8,0
65,0
00. T
he a
dditi
onal
$2
,190
,284
of p
ropo
sed
incr
ease
s w
ill el
imin
ate
the
expe
cted
pos
itive
var
ianc
e on
exp
endi
ture
s th
at o
ccur
s ea
ch y
ear.
5
M&
O B
UD
GET
PR
OJE
CTI
ON
S
Mai
nten
ance
& O
pera
tions
(Ope
ratin
g)20
13-2
014
2014
-201
520
15-2
016
2016
-201
720
17-2
018
2018
-201
91
Pro
ject
ed T
ax B
ase
16,6
91,7
44,4
31
17
,109
,038
,042
17,2
80,1
28,4
22
17
,280
,128
,422
17,2
80,1
28,4
22
17
,280
,128
,422
2M
& O
Tax
Rat
e pe
r $10
0 of
val
ue0.
0100
0.01
000.
0100
0.01
000.
0100
0.01
003
Gro
ss P
roje
cted
Tax
Lev
y (li
ne 1
x li
ne 2
)16
6,91
7,44
417
1,09
0,38
017
2,80
1,28
417
2,80
1,28
417
2,80
1,28
417
2,80
1,28
44
Pro
ject
ed L
evy
lost
due
to o
ver 6
5 ex
empt
ions
5,78
3,48
75,
783,
487
5,78
3,48
75,
783,
487
5,78
3,48
75,
783,
487
5G
ross
Lev
y ne
t of o
ver 6
5 af
fect
(lin
e 3-
line
4)16
1,13
3,95
716
5,30
6,89
316
7,01
7,79
716
7,01
7,79
716
7,01
7,79
716
7,01
7,79
76
Pro
ject
ed T
ax C
olle
ctio
n R
ate
0.98
00.
980
0.98
00.
980
0.98
00.
980
7N
et c
urre
nt y
ear t
ax re
venu
e (li
ne 5
x li
ne 6
)15
7,91
1,27
816
2,00
0,75
516
3,67
7,44
116
3,67
7,44
116
3,67
7,44
116
3,67
7,44
18
Del
inqu
ent t
ax p
aym
ents
1,75
0,00
01,
750,
000
1,75
0,00
01,
750,
000
1,75
0,00
01,
750,
000
9Ta
x pe
nalti
es a
nd in
tere
st1,
200,
000
1,20
0,00
01,
200,
000
1,20
0,00
01,
200,
000
1,20
0,00
010
Enr
ichm
ent T
ax R
even
ue -
Loca
l Col
lect
ions
6,39
4,43
46,
558,
218
6,62
5,36
96,
625,
369
6,62
5,36
96,
625,
369
11To
tal T
ax R
even
ue (a
dd li
nes
7 th
roug
h 10
)16
7,25
5,71
217
1,50
8,97
317
3,25
2,81
017
3,25
2,81
017
3,25
2,81
017
3,25
2,81
012
Oth
er R
even
ue S
ourc
es13
Oth
er L
ocal
Rev
enue
8,34
5,18
78,
345,
187
8,34
5,18
78,
345,
187
8,34
5,18
78,
345,
187
14S
tate
Aid
Incl
udin
g H
old
Har
mle
ss86
,712
,383
90,9
84,8
5389
,304
,893
92,6
56,0
7995
,157
,207
97,6
80,1
3315
TRS
On-
Beh
alf
11,9
57,1
6813
,957
,168
13,9
57,1
6813
,957
,168
13,9
57,1
6813
,957
,168
16Fe
dera
l Rev
enue
2,80
8,31
52,
808,
315
2,80
8,31
52,
808,
315
2,80
8,31
52,
808,
315
17To
tal O
ther
Rev
enue
Sou
rces
(s
um o
f lin
es 1
3 th
roug
h 16
)10
9,82
3,05
311
6,09
5,52
311
4,41
5,56
311
7,76
6,74
912
0,26
7,87
712
2,79
0,80
318
Pro
ject
ed R
even
ue (l
ine1
1 +
line
17)
277,
078,
766
287,
604,
496
287,
668,
373
291,
019,
559
293,
520,
687
296,
043,
613
19 20P
roje
cted
Exp
endi
ture
s27
4,33
1,18
128
4,49
8,46
528
8,70
1,92
529
2,18
1,31
629
5,43
6,11
829
8,21
5,82
421 22
Pro
ject
ed R
ecap
ture
(fro
m S
ched
ule
A)-
-
-
-
-
-
23 24
Pro
ject
ed E
xpen
ditu
res
less
reca
ptur
e(li
ne 2
0 - l
ine
22)
274,
331,
181
284,
498,
465
288,
701,
925
292,
181,
316
295,
436,
118
298,
215,
824
25 26Pr
ojec
ted
Bud
get C
hang
es:
27S
alar
y R
aise
s10
,093
,205
6,02
5,92
34,
000,
000
4,00
0,00
04,
000,
000
4,00
0,00
028
New
Sta
ff Al
loca
tions
7,07
5,00
02,
798,
188
1,00
0,00
075
0,00
050
0,00
029
Oth
er A
djus
tmen
ts3,
523,
352
1,34
3,17
3(7
96,5
40)
(1,2
70,6
09)
(1,2
45,1
97)
(1,2
20,2
93)
30R
educ
tion/
(incr
ease
) to
mai
ntai
n ba
lanc
ed
budg
et(2
,747
,585
)(3
,106
,031
)1,
033,
553
1,16
1,75
7 1,
915,
431
2,17
2,21
1
Exp
endi
ture
s fo
r 201
3-14
incl
ude
all r
ecur
ring
budg
et in
crea
ses
up to
and
incl
udin
g th
ose
in th
e M
ay 2
014
Bud
get S
tatu
s R
epor
t.
6
OPE
RAT
ING
FU
ND
BAL
ANC
E
2013
-201
420
14-2
015
2015
-201
620
16-2
017
2017
-201
820
18-2
019
1O
pera
ting
Fund
Bal
ance
Ana
lysi
s2
Beg
inni
ng F
und
Bal
ance
78,1
52,2
6379
,899
,848
82,0
05,8
7979
,972
,326
77,8
10,5
6974
,895
,138
3%
of t
otal
exp
endi
ture
s28
.49%
28.0
8%28
.41%
27.3
7%26
.34%
25.1
1%4
Bud
get s
urpl
us/(d
efic
it)
2,74
7,58
53,
106,
031
(1,0
33,5
53)
(1,1
61,7
57)
(1,9
15,4
31)
(2,1
72,2
11)
5R
even
ue in
crea
ses/
budg
et re
duct
ions
6E
ndin
g Fu
nd B
alan
ce80
,899
,848
83,0
05,8
7980
,972
,326
78,8
10,5
6975
,895
,138
72,7
22,9
277
% o
f tot
al e
xpen
ditu
res
29.4
9%29
.18%
28.0
5%26
.97%
25.6
9%24
.39%
8 9P
ropo
sed
uses
of f
und
bala
nce:
10E
mpl
oyee
Com
pens
atio
n11
Inst
ruct
iona
l Enh
ance
men
t Fun
d1,
000,
000
1,00
0,00
01,
000,
000
1,00
0,00
01,
000,
000
1,00
0,00
012
Inst
ruct
iona
l Pro
gram
s/C
apita
l Pro
ject
s13
Per
man
ent S
choo
l Fun
d14
Tota
l (ad
d lin
es 1
0 th
roug
h 12
)1,
000,
000
1,00
0,00
01,
000,
000
1,00
0,00
01,
000,
000
1,00
0,00
015
Pro
pose
d E
ndin
g Fu
nd B
alan
ce79
,899
,848
82,0
05,8
7979
,972
,326
77,8
10,5
6974
,895
,138
71,7
22,9
2716
% o
f tot
al e
xpen
ditu
res
29.1
3%28
.82%
27.7
0%26
.63%
25.3
5%24
.05%
Not
e - w
e w
ill try
to m
anag
e fu
nd b
alan
ce to
sus
tain
bet
wee
n 21
.5 a
nd 2
3.5%
(ran
ge w
as 2
0-22
% p
rior t
o 20
09 H
B 3
646)
.
NO
TE:
We
will
need
to tr
ansf
er a
ppro
xim
atel
y $2
.5 m
illion
from
the
Ope
ratin
g Fu
nd to
the
Cap
ital P
roje
cts
fund
to c
over
tota
les
timat
ed c
osts
of a
dditi
onal
app
rove
d ca
pita
l pro
ject
s sl
ated
for c
ompl
etio
n in
the
sum
mer
of 2
014.
We
will
also
nee
d to
mai
ntai
n fu
nd b
alan
ce d
esig
natio
ns fo
r ext
raor
dina
ry re
pairs
in th
e ev
ent t
hat c
apita
l exp
ense
s in
the
sum
mer
of 2
015
exce
edav
aila
ble
bond
fund
s.
Line
4 re
pres
ents
the
diffe
renc
e be
twee
n to
tal r
even
ue a
nd to
tal e
xpen
ses
from
the
Bud
get P
roje
ctio
ns s
heet
.
7
It is important that readers understand where district revenue comes from and how funds are spent, particularly in the Operating Fund, since it is subject to revenue limitations under current school finance legislation.
Legislative Impact on School Finance School finance was a major issue during the 2013 legislative session. Senate Bill (SB) 1 makes significant changes to the amount of funding most districts receive; however, it does not totally restore the funding reductions in public education from the last session. Background – House Bill (HB) 1 from 2006 made significant changes to the Texas Education Code that focused on school property tax rate reduction. HB 1 also created revenue limitations using 2005-06 retained revenue levels to establish a target revenue level for each district. The 2009 legislative session made some school finance adjustments through HB 3646 that basically retained the structure from HB 1 as to revenue limitations and target revenue, but provided limited added funding to districts. The following is a summary of the main points of HB 3646. Districts are guaranteed or held harmless to an amount of revenue at least equal to the state and local target revenue per weighted pupil established under HB 1 plus at least $120 per weighted pupil in new funds. This equaled about $4.9 million for RISD; however, districts were required to use much of the added funds to pay for an added mandatory pay raise for staff.
Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
Local Property Taxes
59.60%
Other Local Sources2.90%
State Sources36.50%
Federal Sources1.00%
2014-2015 Operating FundRevenues by Source
Instruction81.20%
Instructional Support
4.90%
Plant Operations & Technology
11.10%
General Administration
2.80%
2014-2015 Operating Fund Expenditures by Function
8
The equalized wealth level for taxes up to the compressed rate (which for our district is $1.00) increased to approximately $476,500 for 2009-10, $481,900 for 2010-11, and $487,300 in 2011-12 and 2012-13. This means that the district will not make a recapture payment since our wealth level per weighted student fell below this level. While recapture fell, state revenue fell by an equal amount and we had no net gain in available revenue from this change. The first six cents above the compressed rate are equalized to the Austin ISD yield. The equalized wealth level for operating tax rates after that remains at $319,500. Texas elected to fund the cost of HB 3646 and balance their budget using federal stimulus dollars, which were only available for two years and the margins tax created to offset reductions in school property tax generated lower than projected revenue. These decisions contributed to the massive State budget deficit in 2011. This deficit coupled with the Legislative leadership’s desire to not raise taxes or access the rainy day fund, meant that the 2011 Legislative session included a number of possible funding reductions to education. Our Board and Administration started developing budget reduction strategies for several different scenarios of funding loss using input from our staff and community. We prioritized reductions to consider and refined the scenarios as the legislative session progressed. The 2011 Legislative session ended with an appropriations bill that cut funding for public education by approximately $5.4 billion over the biennium. However the session ended with no resolution as to how this funding reduction would be distributed to districts. The Governor called a special session to attempt to address school funding; however, we were required to adopt our budget prior to any resolution on school funding from the special session. Using what we felt was the most likely scenario, our budget for 2011-12 assumed a loss of $20 million in state funding. The special session focused on two methods of implementing reductions to education. One involved across the board reductions for all districts and another focused reductions more heavily on districts with higher target revenue levels. The end result was the passage of SB1 which provided somewhat of a compromise. For RISD, the primary effects of SB1 were a 7.61% reduction in the regular program allotment in Tier I for 2011-12 and a 2% reduction in 2012-13. Reductions to the regular program allotment have the effect of reducing the district’s weighted average daily attendance (WADA). Our Additional State Aid for Tax Relief (ASATR) was also reduced by 7.65% starting in 2012-13, which means our hold harmless funds were reduced starting in 2012-13. This equates to a loss of $14.2 million and $21.7 million in funding for 2011-12 and 2012-13, respectively. The bill stipulates that ASATR will be eliminated by 2017, but does not specify how this will occur. We were in a much stronger financial position than most districts due to the conservative approach of our Board of Trustees and administration over the years. While we made reductions, we were able to avoid the large layoffs and major program reductions that many other districts made during this time.
9
Current - The Texas House and Senate considered various public school funding options during the 2013 session and the end result was passage of SB1. Key funding increases in SB1 include $3.4 billion added to funding distributed by the following:
• increase the Regular Program Allotment Factor to 1 • increase the basic allotment from $4,765 to $4,950 in 2013-14 and $5,040 in 2014-15 • reduce target revenue hold harmless by $282 million in 2013-14 and $417 million in
2014-15 • includes $838.7 million in funding for instructional materials already required under
statute • increase Student Success Initiative funding by $24 million
This equates to additional net State funding for RISD of approximately $8 million. None of the last several legislative sessions have produced a solution to the issue of adequate school funding. State sponsored adequacy studies and school finance proposals have largely been based on what the State could afford to fund or was willing to fund versus what it actually costs to educate to the current mandates. RISD is a plaintiff district in litigation against the State regarding the adequacy of the school finance system. While District Judge Dietz has issued a preliminary ruling in our favor, he has indicated that he will allow further evidence to be submitted regarding changes in public school funding from the 2013 legislative session before issuing a final ruling. Once his ruling has been issued the case will likely be appealed and it is unclear at this point what, if any, additional funding may be provided as a result of the litigation. The district will continue to work with our legislators to try to improve funding. Enrollment One of our most significant challenges involves projecting enrollment. Our actual enrollment for 2013-14 was lower than projected by Templeton Demographics primarily due to lower numbers of students per unit in multi-family housing. Templeton provided updated projections to the Board in January, 2014, for a ten year period and these have been incorporated into our multi-year financial plan. While enrollment is projected to grow, it will be at a more modest rate. The district has conducted campus capacity reviews in areas with the highest enrollment growth and identified schools to increase instructional space in order to serve more students at their neighborhood school. Construction of additional space will be completed this summer for Mohawk, Richland, Dover, Merriman Park, Wallace, and White Rock elementary schools as well as Forest Meadow Junior High.
10
Recapture Current school finance laws involve property wealth equalization (also known as recapture) that is tiered depending on the operating tax rate for a district. A complex system of weights for certain student populations; allotments/adjustments; cost of education index; etc. is used to establish the amount of revenue retained. RISD’s current wealth level falls below the equalized wealth levels for our current operating tax rate. Based on the current formula and wealth levels, RISD would only pay recapture if the operating tax rate were increased above $1.06. This does not result in increased retained revenue since earlier decreases in recapture were simply offset by reductions in state revenue. RISD has sent over $420.1 million to the State in Recapture payments as follows:
Competitive Pay for All District Employees We monitor other district’s salary schedules regularly and make necessary modifications to our salary schedules to remain competitive. The Human Resources Department aggressively seeks top teachers, including beginning teachers, by offering open contracts as early in the hiring process as possible. An open contract guarantees the teacher a position within RISD although the school assignment will be determined later. This practice allows the district to retain the most qualified candidates and balance the average experience for staff.
We modified our teacher compensation schedule several years ago, moving away from a step schedule for RISD veteran teachers. These teachers receive compensation increases as approved by the Board of Trustees. We developed a hiring schedule for teachers joining the district. This compensation structure allows us to provide higher compensation to teachers who have been with the district versus those newly hired.
11
Details of Increased Employee Compensation for the 2014-15 Fiscal Year: The proposed budget for 2014-15 includes funds to provide eligible staff with a 3% increase in base salary at an estimated total operating cost of $6,025,923. The estimated operating cost reflects the cost of raises to staff funded from the general operating fund. Raises to staff whose salary is funded from sources other than the operating fund will be paid from the same source used to fund their base pay. Teacher-Type employees are teachers, counselors, nurses, and librarians. The salary adjustment is the greater of a 3% increase in base salary or the increase in the Hire-in schedule. Employees must receive an evaluation rating of at least satisfactory to receive the increase. Administrative and Support Staff will receive the greater of a 3% salary adjustment from base pay or the assigned competency step adjustment based on years experience in their respective positions. Employees must receive an evaluation rating of at least meets expectations or satisfactory on their last evaluation to receive the salary increase. The district will continue to provide a $2,000 critical need stipend to full time secondary math, secondary science, and Languages Other Than English (LOTE) teachers for 2014-15. This stipend will be subject to annual review of critical needs areas, annual review of available funding, and other factors as identified by the district and Board of Trustees.
Property Values
The Dallas Central Appraisal District (DCAD) provides an estimated preliminary certification of property values by the end of April each year and then certified property values in July. DCAD then provides monthly updates to the certified roll throughout the year to reflect changes in exemptions, value protest resolutions, etc. Property values for calculating operating revenue under the State funding formula are based on the Texas Comptroller’s property tax determination of value each year, which are generally higher than DCAD values. The district works though a multi-step appeal process each year in order to receive what is referred to as local value or the DCAD valuation. Ideally the appeal process would be resolved by the end of the fiscal year, but can take years to resolve in some instances. The Comptroller does not include local optional homestead exemption impact.
The district’s multi-year financial plan projections involve expectations as to the final tax roll that we use to collect tax levy and the Comptroller’s value to determine operating revenue from the State. Changes in taxable value estimates have no net impact on the operating budget due to the limitations imposed by the school finance system. Currently, if tax revenues go up or down then State aid changes and we receive the same net amount per weighted student. Changes in DCAD property values do have a direct impact on debt service revenue as this fund is not subject to wealth equalization or the Comptroller’s valuation.
12
2014-15 preliminary values received are 9.1% higher than current estimated 2013-14 final values. While this is encouraging, values will fall due to protests by the end of the year and final assessed values. The district has lost an average of 6.5% from the preliminary values to the final values over a 10 year period, with a high of a 10.3% loss and a low of a 4.6% loss.
We are projecting a 2.5% increase in 2014-15, 1% in 2015-16, and then flat for 2016 through 2019. This is higher than previously projected and will provide additional future bond capacity without raising the debt tax rate and/or protection from interest rate risks on future bonds. RISD remains one of the few districts that continue to provide a local optional homestead exemption to our residential taxpayers. This, combined with a moderate debt tax rate, results in one of the lowest tax levies for our taxpayers of any district in the metroplex (a comparison of tax impact on property owners is provided later in the document). 2014-15 Budget Recommendations While our approach to budgeting has been more conservative than many of our peer districts, we believe it created the most stability for our staff and represented the most sustainable approach for our community. This conservative approach put us in a much stronger financial position than many districts, contributing to our high credit rating; balanced sustainable budget; low tax levy compared to area districts, strong reserves and ability to avoid major layoffs. The proposed budget for 2014-15 includes a more aggressive approach to both revenue and expenses than in prior years. Revenue calculations use the exact enrollment projections from the demographer with no buffer for negative variance. Proposed expenses include using most of the positive expense variance we would expect to see each year from unspent funds and open positions that was identified in discussions involving total available funds. This means that negative variances from items such as lower than projected enrollment growth will have to be funded from operating fund balance. Alternatives involving immediately increasing the tax burden on our community or exhausting our reserves are not recommended at this time. The recommendation is that we move forward with the budget as proposed and if actual enrollment in 2014-15 is higher than projected, consider reinstituting an operating fund budget buffer to address potential variances in the future and replenish discretionary funds for added capital projects.
13
2014-15 Budget Increase Recommendations
The remainder of this document contains details as to proposed budgets by fund and function and miscellaneous statistics and analysis. Please feel free to contact our offices with questions. Thank you.
ProposalProposedIncrease Comments
3% raise for staff- amount reflects cost foremployees funded from Operating Fund only
$6,025,923 Provides for competitive salaries and staff retention
28 Additional Elementary Allocations $1,400,000 Provides for enrollment growth, reduced overflow, and reduced class sizes
2 Additional Secondary Allocations $100,000 Provides for increased CTE offeringsAdditional Assistant Principal(s)Elementary 3Secondary 0
$194,400
The increase in student enrollment at several schools due to constructionmay necessitate a need for new or a shift in Asst. Principals at the elementary level.
Athletics - Increase stipend for Volleyball Coaches$12,300
Proposal increases volleyball stipend 12,300 to equal basketball stipend forhead and assistant coaches.
Extra Curricular - Increase stipend for CheerleaderSponsors
$3,500 Increases varsity cheerleader sponsor stipend to market.
Increase days for Environmental Center Manager $3,835 Increase days form 180 to 207 (27 days at 142.03 daily rate)Mentor Program $120,000 Budget will support stipends, training, substitute payIncrease SDS Salary $65,000 65 total SDS district wide; retention initiativeInstructional PK Aides (2) $35,098 Wallace and Dover Elementary - Aide I (PRJ)PK Teachers $100,000 Wallace and Dover ElementaryDirector of Data Analysis and Reporting $80,850 Position is needed to support Dept. of Acct. and Continuous ImprovementSpecial Education - Diagnosticians AVJ paygrade, (15) $836,130 Based on audit findings.Special Education - Paraprofessionals (2) $41,000 Based on audit findings.Dyslexia - Teachers (5) $250,000 Based on audit findings.Registrars (4) $120,000 To register students, freeing up counselorsAdditional Counselors (2.2 Elementary) $144,630 Elementary Counselors for larger schoolsIncrease Health Services Aide Compensation $15,000 MarketTesting Coordinators (ACI) $25,000 Fund half time Testing Coordinator at LHFCIntern - Secondary (1) $60,000 To serve as Assistant PrincipalDyslexia & Library Instructional Support $45,000 Clerical help for Dyslexia Director, Upgrade from Program Specialist I to
Program Specialist II - LibraryInstructional Programs - Learning List, ABYDOS $42,500 LL Subscription 12,500; ABYDOS stipends 30,000Increase the hourly rate for Dallas SRO's and add 1SRO to support elementary campuses
$76,000 Mar for SRO's and enhance elementary support
Instructional Program - Mariachi (PHS) $8,000 Teacher Stipend and suppliesCTE Advisors (2) $120,000 Support for 2nd year CTE studentsAPPS - Communications $10,000 Maintenance of APPSIncrease Budget for STARS Teacher Committee(Organizational Development)
$1,080 Includes substitutes, food and tickets to REA Banquet for STARCommittee
Curriculum & Instruction central staff reorganization $249,124 K-12 curriculum alignment, support retention efforts, support technologyinitiatives
KRONOS timekeeping system maintenance $66,124 provide for maintenance expense no longer eligible for bondPACE payroll increase $4,790 Support expanded PACE offerings to students
Total Budget Increase $10,255,284
14
OFFICIAL BUDGET
The Official Budget is presented for the Operating Fund, the Child Nutrition Fund and the Debt Service Fund.
15
RICHARDSON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICTOFFICIAL BUDGETFISCAL YEAR 2014-15
Child Debt Total byOperating Nutrition Service Enrolled
Fund Fund Fund Total Student*
Estimated RevenuesLocal Revenue 179,854,160 4,878,695 48,733,466 233,466,321 6,045 State Revenue 104,942,021 88,332 - 105,030,353 2,719 Federal Revenue 2,808,315 11,606,851 - 14,415,166 373
Total Revenues 287,604,496 16,573,878 48,733,466 352,911,840 9,137
Appropriations11 - Instruction 183,565,650 - - 183,565,650 4,753 12 - Library & Media Services 5,143,643 - - 5,143,643 133 13 - Curriculum/Instructional Staff Development 3,418,200 - - 3,418,200 89 21 - Instructional Administration 5,184,605 - - 5,184,605 134 23 - School Leadership 20,526,058 - - 20,526,058 531 31 - Guidance and Counseling 10,987,265 - - 10,987,265 284 32 - Attendance and Social Work 808,754 - - 808,754 21 33 - Health Services 3,950,728 - - 3,950,728 102 34 - Student Transportation 4,463,791 - - 4,463,791 116 35 - Child Nutrition - 16,066,243 - 16,066,243 416 36 - Co-Curricular / Extra Curricular Activities 5,876,465 - - 5,876,465 153 41 - General Administration 7,633,365 - - 7,633,365 198 51 - Plant Maintenance & Operations 25,458,177 497,635 - 25,955,812 672 52 - Security and Monitoring Services 1,553,565 - - 1,553,565 40 53 - Data Processing Services 4,800,058 - - 4,800,058 124 61 - Community Services 171,690 10,000 - 181,690 5 71 - Debt Administration 9,941 - 48,589,063 48,599,004 1,258 95 - Juvenile Justice Alternative Education Program 50,000 - - 50,000 1 97 - Tax Increment Fund - - 132,650 132,650 3 99 - Other Intergovernmental Charges 896,510 - - 896,510 23
Total Appropriations 284,498,465 16,573,878 48,721,713 349,794,056 9,056
*Based on 2014-15 enrollment projection of 38,623 students
16
RIC
HA
RD
SON
IND
EPEN
DEN
T SC
HO
OL
DIS
TRIC
T20
14-2
015
EXPE
ND
ITU
RE
BU
DG
ET
6100
6200
6300
6400
6500
6600
Payr
oll
Prof
. &
Mat
eria
ls &
Oth
er O
per.
Deb
tC
apita
l
Cos
tsC
ont.
Svcs
.Su
pplie
sEx
pens
esSe
rvic
eO
utla
yTo
tal
Func
tion
11 -
Inst
ruct
ion
199
Ope
ratin
g Fu
nd17
8,74
2,97
8$
85
4,08
5$
3,22
9,62
8$
68
8,95
9$
50
,000
$
183,
565,
650
$
24
0 C
hild
Nut
ritio
n-
-
-
-
-
-
-
59
9 D
ebt S
ervi
ce-
-
-
-
-
-
-
To
tal f
or F
unct
ion
1117
8,74
2,97
8
85
4,08
5
3,22
9,62
8
68
8,95
9
-
50
,000
183,
565,
650
Func
tion
12 -
Libr
ary
& M
edia
Ser
vice
s19
9 O
pera
ting
Fund
4,84
7,93
9
25,3
50
250,
870
19
,484
-
-
5,
143,
643
24
0 C
hild
Nut
ritio
n-
-
-
-
-
-
-
59
9 D
ebt S
ervi
ce-
-
-
-
-
-
-
To
tal f
or F
unct
ion
124,
847,
939
25
,350
25
0,87
0
19,4
84
-
-
5,14
3,64
3
Func
tion
13 -
Cur
ricul
um/In
stru
ctio
nal S
taff
Dev
elop
men
t19
9 O
pera
ting
Fund
2,80
9,88
0
138,
810
15
1,68
9
317,
821
-
-
3,41
8,20
0
240
Chi
ld N
utrit
ion
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
599
Deb
t Ser
vice
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Tota
l for
Fun
ctio
n 13
2,80
9,88
0
138,
810
15
1,68
9
317,
821
-
-
3,41
8,20
0
Func
tion
21 -
Inst
ruct
iona
l Adm
inis
trat
ion
199
Ope
ratin
g Fu
nd4,
653,
443
27
5,96
1
155,
781
99
,420
-
-
5,
184,
605
24
0 C
hild
Nut
ritio
n-
-
-
-
-
-
-
59
9 D
ebt S
ervi
ce-
-
-
-
-
-
-
To
tal f
or F
unct
ion
214,
653,
443
27
5,96
1
155,
781
99
,420
-
-
5,
184,
605
Func
tion
23 -
Scho
ol L
eade
rshi
p19
9 O
pera
ting
Fund
20,2
30,2
93
111,
915
14
7,51
0
36,3
40
-
-
20,5
26,0
58
24
0 C
hild
Nut
ritio
n-
-
-
-
-
-
-
59
9 D
ebt S
ervi
ce-
-
-
-
-
-
-
To
tal f
or F
unct
ion
2320
,230
,293
11
1,91
5
147,
510
36
,340
-
-
20
,526
,058
17
RIC
HA
RD
SON
IND
EPEN
DEN
T SC
HO
OL
DIS
TRIC
T20
14-2
015
EXPE
ND
ITU
RE
BU
DG
ET
6100
6200
6300
6400
6500
6600
Payr
oll
Prof
. &
Mat
eria
ls &
Oth
er O
per.
Deb
tC
apita
l
Cos
tsC
ont.
Svcs
.Su
pplie
sEx
pens
esSe
rvic
eO
utla
yTo
tal
Func
tion
31 -
Gui
danc
e an
d C
ouns
elin
g19
9 O
pera
ting
Fund
10,6
82,1
50
68,6
00
205,
046
31
,469
-
-
10
,987
,265
240
Chi
ld N
utrit
ion
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
599
Deb
t Ser
vice
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Tota
l for
Fun
ctio
n 31
10,6
82,1
50
68,6
00
205,
046
31
,469
-
-
10
,987
,265
Func
tion
32 -
Atte
ndan
ce a
nd S
ocia
l Wor
k19
9 O
pera
ting
Fund
801,
371
500
4,
883
2,00
0
-
-
808,
754
24
0 C
hild
Nut
ritio
n-
-
-
-
-
-
-
59
9 D
ebt S
ervi
ce-
-
-
-
-
-
-
To
tal f
or F
unct
ion
3280
1,37
1
50
0
4,88
3
2,
000
-
-
80
8,75
4
Func
tion
33 -
Hea
lth S
ervi
ces
199
Ope
ratin
g Fu
nd3,
727,
367
16
8,60
0
50,7
47
4,01
4
-
-
3,95
0,72
8
240
Chi
ld N
utrit
ion
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
599
Deb
t Ser
vice
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Tota
l for
Fun
ctio
n 33
3,72
7,36
7
168,
600
50
,747
4,
014
-
-
3,
950,
728
Func
tion
34 -
Stud
ent T
rans
port
atio
n19
9 O
pera
ting
Fund
502,
214
3,85
8,11
2
72
,815
30
,650
-
-
4,
463,
791
24
0 C
hild
Nut
ritio
n-
-
-
-
-
-
-
59
9 D
ebt S
ervi
ce-
-
-
-
-
-
-
To
tal f
or F
unct
ion
3450
2,21
4
3,
858,
112
72,8
15
30,6
50
-
-
4,46
3,79
1
Func
tion
35 -
Chi
ld N
utrit
ion
199
Ope
ratin
g Fu
nd-
-
-
-
-
-
-
24
0 C
hild
Nut
ritio
n5,
757,
220
47
7,27
6
9,62
9,24
7
62
,500
14
0,00
0
16,0
66,2
43
59
9 D
ebt S
ervi
ce-
-
-
-
-
-
-
To
tal f
or F
unct
ion
355,
757,
220
47
7,27
6
9,62
9,24
7
62
,500
-
14
0,00
0
16,0
66,2
43
18
RIC
HA
RD
SON
IND
EPEN
DEN
T SC
HO
OL
DIS
TRIC
T20
14-2
015
EXPE
ND
ITU
RE
BU
DG
ET
6100
6200
6300
6400
6500
6600
Payr
oll
Prof
. &
Mat
eria
ls &
Oth
er O
per.
Deb
tC
apita
l
Cos
tsC
ont.
Svcs
.Su
pplie
sEx
pens
esSe
rvic
eO
utla
yTo
tal
Func
tion
36 -
Co-
Cur
ricul
ar/E
xtra
Cur
ricul
ar19
9 O
pera
ting
Fund
4,35
9,60
7
477,
567
26
5,27
0
774,
021
-
-
5,87
6,46
5
240
Chi
ld N
utrit
ion
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
599
Deb
t Ser
vice
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Tota
l for
Fun
ctio
n 36
4,35
9,60
7
477,
567
26
5,27
0
774,
021
-
-
5,87
6,46
5
Func
tion
41 -
Gen
eral
Adm
inis
trat
ion
199
Ope
ratin
g Fu
nd5,
865,
599
73
2,01
1
418,
487
61
7,26
8
-
-
7,
633,
365
24
0 C
hild
Nut
ritio
n-
-
-
-
-
-
-
59
9 D
ebt S
ervi
ce-
-
-
-
-
-
-
To
tal f
or F
unct
ion
415,
865,
599
73
2,01
1
418,
487
61
7,26
8
-
-
7,
633,
365
Func
tion
51 -
Plan
t Mai
nten
ance
& O
pera
tions
199
Ope
ratin
g Fu
nd14
,542
,112
8,
510,
484
1,90
8,13
9
49
7,44
2
-
-
25
,458
,177
240
Chi
ld N
utrit
ion
108,
667
388,
968
-
-
49
7,63
5
599
Deb
t Ser
vice
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Tota
l for
Fun
ctio
n 51
14,6
50,7
79
8,89
9,45
2
1,
908,
139
497,
442
-
-
25,9
55,8
12
Func
tion
52 -
Secu
rity/
Mon
itorin
g Se
rvic
es19
9 O
pera
ting
Fund
465,
960
1,07
6,70
5
10
,000
90
0
-
-
1,
553,
565
24
0 C
hild
Nut
ritio
n-
-
-
-
-
-
-
59
9 D
ebt S
ervi
ce-
-
-
-
-
-
-
To
tal f
or F
unct
ion
5246
5,96
0
1,
076,
705
10,0
00
900
-
-
1,55
3,56
5
Func
tion
53 -
Dat
a Pr
oces
sing
Ser
vice
s19
9 O
pera
ting
Fund
3,74
3,56
9
968,
129
58
,598
29
,762
-
-
4,
800,
058
24
0 C
hild
Nut
ritio
n-
-
-
-
-
-
-
59
9 D
ebt S
ervi
ce-
-
-
-
-
-
-
To
tal f
or F
unct
ion
533,
743,
569
96
8,12
9
58,5
98
29,7
62
-
-
4,80
0,05
8
19
RIC
HA
RD
SON
IND
EPEN
DEN
T SC
HO
OL
DIS
TRIC
T20
14-2
015
EXPE
ND
ITU
RE
BU
DG
ET
6100
6200
6300
6400
6500
6600
Payr
oll
Prof
. &
Mat
eria
ls &
Oth
er O
per.
Deb
tC
apita
l
Cos
tsC
ont.
Svcs
.Su
pplie
sEx
pens
esSe
rvic
eO
utla
yTo
tal
Func
tion
61 -
Com
mun
ity S
ervi
ces
199
Ope
ratin
g Fu
nd12
7,69
0
44
,000
-
-
-
-
171,
690
24
0 C
hild
Nut
ritio
n10
,000
-
-
-
-
10,0
00
59
9 D
ebt S
ervi
ce-
-
-
-
-
-
-
To
tal f
or F
unct
ion
6113
7,69
0
44
,000
-
-
-
-
181,
690
Func
tion
71 -
Deb
t Adm
inis
trat
ion
199
Ope
ratin
g Fu
nd9,
941
-
9,94
1
240
Chi
ld N
utrit
ion
-
-
599
Deb
t Ser
vice
48,5
89,0
63
-
48,5
89,0
63
To
tal f
or F
unct
ion
71-
-
-
-
48
,599
,004
-
48
,599
,004
Func
tion
95 -
Paym
ents
of J
JAEP
199
Ope
ratin
g Fu
nd50
,000
-
-
-
-
50,0
00
24
0 C
hild
Nut
ritio
n-
-
-
-
-
-
-
59
9 D
ebt S
ervi
ce-
-
-
-
-
-
-
To
tal f
or F
unct
ion
95-
50,0
00
-
-
-
-
50
,000
Func
tion
97 -
Tax
Incr
emen
t Fun
d19
9 O
pera
ting
Fund
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
240
Chi
ld N
utrit
ion
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
599
Deb
t Ser
vice
132,
650
-
-
132,
650
To
tal f
or F
unct
ion
97-
-
-
132,
650
-
-
132,
650
Func
tion
99 -
Oth
er In
terg
over
nmen
tal C
harg
es19
9 O
pera
ting
Fund
-
89
6,51
0
-
-
-
-
89
6,51
0
240
Chi
ld N
utrit
ion
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
599
Deb
t Ser
vice
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Tota
l for
Fun
ctio
n 99
-
89
6,51
0
-
-
-
-
89
6,51
0
Gra
nd T
otal
261,
978,
059
$
19,1
23,5
83$
16,5
58,7
10$
3,34
4,70
0$
48,5
99,0
04$
190,
000
$
34
9,79
4,05
6$
199
Ope
ratin
g Fu
nd25
6,10
2,17
2
18
,257
,339
6,
929,
463
3,14
9,55
0
9,94
1
50
,000
284,
498,
465
24
0 C
hild
Nut
ritio
n5,
875,
887
86
6,24
4
9,62
9,24
7
62
,500
-
14
0,00
0
16,5
73,8
78
59
9 D
ebt S
ervi
ce-
-
-
132,
650
48,5
89,0
63
-
48,7
21,7
13
20
OPERATING FUND
The Operating Fund is the fund where most expenditures are recorded for the operation of the schools and central offices. Expenditures paid from this fund include teachers’ and administrators’ salaries and benefits, classroom supplies and equipment, educational computing, utilities, routine maintenance of buildings and transportation costs. The maintenance and operations budget is included in the Operating Fund. Also included in the Operating Fund are budgets for tuition based programs and co-curricular activities.
21
RICHARDSON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICTOFFICIAL BUDGET - OPERATING FUNDFISCAL YEAR 2014-15
2013-14 2014-15Adopted Increases Adopted Percent of PercentageBudget (Decreases) Budget Total Change
Estimated RevenuesLocal Revenue 173,298,927 6,555,233$ 179,854,160 62.5% 3.8%State Revenue 97,680,880 7,261,141 104,942,021 36.5% 7.4%Federal Revenue 2,808,315 - 2,808,315 1.0% 0.0% Total Revenues 273,788,122 13,816,374 287,604,496 100.0% 5.0%
Appropriations11 - Instruction 176,287,412 7,278,238 183,565,650 64.5% 4.1%12 - Library & Media Services 5,031,211 112,432 5,143,643 1.8% 2.2%13 - Curriculum/Instructional Staff Development 3,136,193 282,007 3,418,200 1.2% 9.0%21 - Instructional Administration 4,733,668 450,937 5,184,605 1.8% 9.5%23 - School Leadership 19,794,372 731,686 20,526,058 7.2% 3.7%31 - Guidance and Counseling 10,248,065 739,200 10,987,265 3.9% 7.2%32 - Attendance and Social Work 783,897 24,857 808,754 0.3% 3.2%33 - Health Services 3,806,615 144,113 3,950,728 1.4% 3.8%34 - Student Transportation 4,459,129 4,662 4,463,791 1.6% 0.1%36 - Co-Curricular/Extra Curricular Activities 5,751,629 124,836 5,876,465 2.1% 2.2%41 - General Administration 7,348,897 284,468 7,633,365 2.7% 3.9%51 - Plant Maintenance & Operations 25,286,449 171,728 25,458,177 8.9% 0.7%52 - Security and Monitoring Services 1,483,333 70,232 1,553,565 0.5% 4.7%53 - Data Processing Services 4,216,434 583,624 4,800,058 1.7% 13.8%61 - Community Services 213,007 (41,317) 171,690 0.1% (19.4%)71 - Debt Administration 26,967 (17,026) 9,941 0.0% (63.1%)95 - Payments to JJAEP 50,000 - 50,000 0.0% 0.0%99 - Other Intergovernmental Charges 874,517 21,993 896,510 0.3% 2.5% Total Appropriations 273,531,795 10,966,670 284,498,465 100.0% 4.0%
22
RICHARDSON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICTOPERATING FUND BUDGET - ESTIMATED REVENUESFISCAL YEAR 2014-15
2013-14 2014-15Adopted Increases Adopted Percent of PercentageBudget (Decreases) Budget Total Change
Local Sources:Property Taxes5711 Property Taxes-Current Year 155,533,987$ 6,466,768$ 162,000,755$ 56.3% 4.2%5711 Property Taxes-Enrichment Tax-Local Collections 6,469,753 88,465 6,558,218 2.3% 1.4%5712 Property Taxes-Prior Years 1,750,000 - 1,750,000 0.6% 0.0%5719 Penalty & Interest 1,200,000 - 1,200,000 0.4% 0.0%
Total Property Taxes 164,953,740 6,555,233 171,508,973 59.6% 4.0%
Fees & Tuitions5739 Fees & Tuition 4,689,187 - 4,689,187 1.6% 0.0% Enterprising Activities 5752 Game Receipts-All Sports 510,000 - 510,000 0.2% 0.0%
Miscellaneous Revenues5742 Investment Income 575,000 - 575,000 0.2% 0.0%5759 Athletic Concession Commission 80,000 - 80,000 0.0% 0.0%5743 Rentals on Facilities 1,846,000 - 1,846,000 0.6% 0.0%5744 Gifts 20,000 - 20,000 0.0% 0.0%5745 Theft and Vandalism 10,000 - 10,000 0.0% 0.0%5749 Other Misc Income 615,000 - 615,000 0.2% 0.0%
Total Other Local Revenues 8,345,187 - 8,345,187 2.9% 0.0%
Total Local Sources 173,298,927 6,555,233 179,854,160 62.5% 3.8%
State Sources:5811/5812 State Aid Including Hold Harmless &
Salary Transitional Entitlement 85,723,712 5,261,141 90,984,853 31.6% 6.1%5831 TRS On Behalf 11,957,168 2,000,000 13,957,168 4.9% 16.7%Total State Sources 97,680,880 7,261,141 104,942,021 36.5% 7.4%
Federal Sources:5929 Miscellaneous Federal 600,000 - 600,000 0.2% 0.0%5931 School Health and Related Services 2,208,315 - 2,208,315 0.8% 0.0%Total Federal Sources 2,808,315 - 2,808,315 1.0% 0.0%
Total Operating Fund 273,788,122$ 13,816,374$ 287,604,496$ 100.0% 5.0%
23
CHILD NUTRITION FUND
The Child Nutrition Fund is where revenues and expenditures are recorded for the school lunch and breakfast program. Expenditures of the Child Nutrition Fund are funded from lunch and breakfast sales, state grants and federal grants. This fund is included with other Special Revenue Funds.
24
RICHARDSON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICTOFFICIAL BUDGET - CHILD NUTRITION FUNDFISCAL YEAR 2014-15
2013-14 2014-15Adopted Increases Adopted Percent of PercentageBudget (Decreases) Budget Total Change
Revenue5751 Cafeteria Sales 4,536,709$ 326,986 4,863,695$ 29.4% 7.2%5742 Investment Income 17,000 (2,000) 15,000 0.1% (11.8%)5829 State Reimbursements 81,431 6,901 88,332 0.5% 8.5%5920 Federal Reimbursements 11,337,960 268,891 11,606,851 70.0% 2.4% Total Revenue 15,973,100 600,778 16,573,878 100.0% 3.8%
Expenditures
35 Food Service Payroll 5,423,702 333,518 5,757,220 34.7% 6.1%
Contracted Services 445,948 31,328 477,276 3.0% 7.0% Materials & Travel 9,499,181 192,566 9,691,747 58.4% 2.0% Capital Outlay 100,000 40,000 140,000 0.8% 40.0%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations Payroll 105,301 3,366 108,667 0.7% 3.2%
Contracted Services 388,968 - 388,968 2.3% 0.0%61 Community Service
Payroll 10,000 - 10,000 0.1% 0.0% Total Expenditures 15,973,100$ 600,778$ 16,573,878$ 100.0% 3.8%
25
DEBT SERVICE FUND
The Debt Service Fund contains monies that are set aside to pay principle and interest on debt incurred through the sale of bonds. The proceeds from bonds are used to finance long-term improvements to school buildings as well as to build and equip new schools.
26
RICHARDSON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICTOFFICIAL BUDGET - DEBT SERVICE FUNDFISCAL YEAR 2014-15
2013-14 2014-15Amended Increases Official Percent of PercentageBudget (Decreases) Budget Total Change
Revenue71-5711 Property Taxes-Current Yr $46,743,603 $1,022,213 $47,765,816 98.0% 2.2%71-5712 Property Taxes-Prior Yrs 500,000 0 500,000 1.0% 0.0%71-5719 Penalty & Interest 300,000 0 300,000 0.6% 0.0%97-5746 Property Taxes-TIF 60,900 71,750 132,650 0.3% 117.8% Total Property Taxes 47,604,503 1,093,963 48,698,466 99.9% 2.3%
5742 Investment Earnings 35,000 0 35,000 0.1% 0.0%Total Revenue $47,639,503 $1,093,963 $48,733,466 100.0% 2.3%
Debt Service Requirements71-6500 Debt Payments 47,332,779 $1,256,286 $48,589,065 99.7% 2.7%97-6499 TIF Payments 115,900 16,750 132,650 0.3% 14.5%Total Debt Service Requirements 47,448,679$ 1,273,036$ 48,721,715$ 100.0% 2.7%
Principal InterestPayments Payments Other Amounts Total
Detailed Debt Service to be Paid to be Paid to be Paid PaymentUnlimited Tax School Bldg Bonds, Series 1998B - 272,025 1,000 273,025Unlimited Tax School Bldg Refunding Bonds, Series 2005 5,270,000 1,024,338 1,000 6,295,338Unlimited Tax School Bldg Bonds, Series 2005 2,730,000 68,250 1,000 2,799,250Unlimited Tax School Bldg Refunding Bonds, Series 2006 240,000 824,865 1,000 1,065,865Unlimited Tax School Bldg Bonds, Series 2006 935,000 65,138 1,000 1,001,138Unlimited Tax School Bldg Refunding Bonds, Series 2006A 220,000 1,164,760 1,000 1,385,760Unlimited Tax School Bldg Bonds, Series 2007 1,460,000 1,417,575 1,000 2,878,575Unlimited Tax School Bldg Bonds, Series 2008 2,665,000 981,250 1,000 3,647,250Unlimited Tax School Bldg Bonds, Series 2009 100,000 381,500 1,000 482,500Unlimited Tax School Bldg Bonds, Series 2010 780,000 530,200 1,000 1,311,200Unlimited Tax School Bldg Refunding Bonds, Series 2010 155,000 401,650 1,000 557,650Unlimited Tax School Bldg Refunding Bonds, Series 2011 6,765,000 605,413 1,000 7,371,413Unlimited Tax School Bldg Bonds, Series 2011 - 1,727,244 1,000 1,728,244Unlimited Tax School Bldg Refunding Bonds, Series 2012 - 750,100 1,000 751,100Unlimited Tax School Bldg & Refunding Bonds, Series 2012 3,800,000 3,971,025 1,000 7,772,025Unlimited Tax School Bldg & Refunding Bonds, Series 2013 1,575,000 3,000,275 1,000 4,576,275Unlimited Tax School Bldg Bonds, Series 2014A 2,385,000 725,257 1,000 3,111,257Unlimited Tax School Bldg Refunding Bonds, Series 2014B 330,000 857,700 1,000 1,188,700Professional Services Bond Counsel - - 17,500 17,500TIF Payments Skillman Corridor - - 132,650 132,650Estimated Closing Costs for
New Bond Issues 375,000 375,000Total required for Debt Service $29,410,000 $18,768,565 $543,150 $48,721,715
27
RICHARDSON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICTDEBT SERVICE SCHEDULESFISCAL YEAR 2014-2015SUMMARY OF ALL DEBT PAYMENTS
Total PrincipalCalendar Year Principal Interest and Interest
2014-15 29,410,000 18,768,565 48,178,565
2015-16 25,530,000 17,512,069 43,042,069
2016-17 19,944,995 18,808,630 38,753,625
2017-18 22,750,000 15,695,845 38,445,845
2018-19 22,350,000 14,766,281 37,116,281
2019-20 20,199,992 16,940,066 37,140,058
2020-21 24,195,000 12,959,951 37,154,951
2021-22 21,015,000 11,959,776 32,974,776
2022-23 22,295,000 11,006,449 33,301,449
2023-24 20,220,000 10,046,435 30,266,435
2024-25 19,950,000 9,131,191 29,081,191
2025-26 17,575,000 8,254,011 25,829,011
2026-27 18,420,000 7,410,350 25,830,350
2027-28 16,795,000 6,595,956 23,390,956
2028-29 17,610,000 5,787,006 23,397,006
2029-30 15,130,000 5,018,500 20,148,500
2030-31 13,370,000 4,339,025 17,709,025
2031-32 13,330,000 3,690,194 17,020,194
2032-33 12,315,000 3,081,763 15,396,763
2033-34 12,070,000 2,515,244 14,585,244
2034-35 11,820,000 1,951,163 13,771,163
2035-36 12,400,000 1,369,381 13,769,381
2036-37 10,525,000 808,875 11,333,875
2037-38 8,570,000 331,500 8,901,500
2038-39 2,345,000 58,625 2,403,625
$430,134,987 $208,806,851 $638,941,838
*Note: Total principal and interest does not include $543,150 in administrative fees, TIF payments and bond issuance costs to be paid in 2014-2015.
28
Miscellaneous Statistics and Analysis
10-Year Comparative Data
Change in the Tax Bill of a $100k Single-Family Residence (w / Homestead Exemption)
Comparison of ISD Tax Rates per $100 Property Value
29
Richardson ISD10-Year Comparative Data
2002-03 2012-13 % ChangeOperating Expenses (less recapture) 214,123,811$ 246,616,157$ 15.2%
Debt Service Expenses 50,042,030$ 46,255,785$ (7.6%)
Child Nutrition 11,025,683$ 13,304,615$ 20.7%
Tax Rate 1.808 1.340 (25.9%)
Limited English Proficient Students 6,468 9,078 40.4%
Economically Disadvantaged Students 13,773 22,019 59.9%
Total Enrollment 34,949 37,954 8.6%
CPI (inflation) increase per US Bureau of Labor Statistics 27.0%
Total Staff 4,241 4,695 10.7%
Central Administration Staff 67 43 (36.0%)
Data obtained from TEA's 2002 Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Report and 2013 Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR). Beginning with 2012-13, AEIS transitioned into what is now referred to as the TAPR.
2002-03 AEIS financial data uses 2002-03 original adopted budget information:Total Operating Expenses (less recapture) are identified as budgeted operating fund expenditures (less recapture)Debt Service Expenses are defined as non-operating debt service expenditures.Child Nutrition Expenses are defined as budgeted expenditures for Food Service (function 35).
2012-13 TAPR financial data uses the actual 2011-12 year-end audited financials:Total Operating Expenses (less recapture) are defined as operating disbursements.Debt Service Expenses are calculated using debt service expenditures for all funds less the operating fund portion.Child Nutrition Expenses are defined as food service expenditures (Function 35).
30
Ric
hard
son
ISD
Cha
nge
in th
e Ta
x B
ill o
f a $
100,
000
Sing
le-F
amily
Res
iden
ce W
ith H
omes
tead
Exe
mpt
ion
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,0
00
$1,2
00
$1,4
00
$1,6
00
$1,8
00
$2,0
00
31
Com
paris
on o
f ISD
Tax
esTa
x R
ates
Per
$10
0 Pr
oper
ty V
alue
Sort
ed b
y Ta
x Le
vy o
n a
Hom
este
ad
CAl
len
CM
cKin
ney
CPr
ospe
rC
Cel
ina
CW
ylie
CC
omm
unity
CBl
ue R
idge
CAn
naC
Mel
issa
CLo
vejo
yD
Ced
ar H
illC
Prin
ceto
nD
DeS
oto
DG
rand
Pra
irie
DIrv
ing
CFr
isco
CPl
ano
DC
oppe
llD
Lanc
aste
rD
Dun
canv
ille
DM
esqu
iteD
Sunn
yval
eC
Farm
ersv
ille
DC
arro
llton
/Far
mer
s B
ranc
hD
Gar
land
DR
icha
rdso
nD
Dal
las
DH
ighl
and
Park
Not
e: D
istri
cts
in b
old
wer
e C
hapt
er 4
1 di
stric
ts in
2R
ISD
rank
s 5t
h w
hen
sorte
d by
tax
levy
on
a no
n-h
Rec
ent Y
ears
' Tax
Rat
es
Loca
lLo
cal
Tota
lO
ptio
nTa
x Le
vy o
n a
$100
,000
Tota
lO
ptio
nTa
x Le
vy o
n a
$100
,000
Tax
Hom
este
adN
on-
Res
iden
ceTa
x%
Hom
este
adN
on-
Res
iden
ceR
ate
Exem
ptio
nH
omes
tead
Hom
este
adR
ate
Cha
nge
Exem
ptio
nH
omes
tead
Hom
este
ad
1.67
0000
$1,6
70.0
0$1
,419
.50
1.67
0000
0.00
%$1
,670
.00
$1,4
19.5
01.
5400
00$1
,540
.00
$1,3
09.0
01.
6700
008.
44%
$1,6
70.0
0$1
,419
.50
1.67
0000
$1,6
70.0
0$1
,419
.50
1.67
0000
0.00
%$1
,670
.00
$1,4
19.5
01.
6400
00$1
,330
.60
$1,1
53.2
81.
6400
000.
00%
$1,6
40.0
0$1
,394
.00
1.64
0000
$1,6
40.0
0$1
,394
.00
1.64
0000
0.00
%$1
,640
.00
$1,3
94.0
01.
6250
00$1
,625
.00
$1,3
81.2
51.
6250
000.
00%
$1,6
25.0
0$1
,381
.25
1.61
6669
$1,6
16.6
7$1
,374
.17
1.61
6600
(0.0
0%)
$1,6
16.6
0$1
,374
.11
1.54
0000
$1,5
40.0
0$1
,309
.00
1.54
0000
0.00
%$1
,540
.00
$1,3
09.0
01.
5400
00$1
,540
.00
$1,3
09.0
01.
5400
000.
00%
$1,5
40.0
0$1
,309
.00
1.53
5000
$1,5
35.0
0$1
,304
.75
1.53
5000
0.00
%$1
,535
.00
$1,3
04.7
51.
4400
00$1
,640
.00
$1,3
94.0
01.
5250
005.
90%
$1,5
25.0
0$1
,296
.25
1.48
0000
$1,4
80.0
0$1
,258
.00
1.51
0000
2.03
%$1
,510
.00
$1,2
83.5
01.
4400
00$1
,440
.00
$1,2
24.0
01.
4900
003.
47%
$1,4
90.0
0$1
,266
.50
1.46
5000
$1,4
65.0
0$1
,245
.25
1.46
5000
0.00
%$1
,465
.00
$1,2
45.2
51.
4650
00$1
,465
.00
$1,2
45.2
51.
4650
000.
00%
$1,4
65.0
0$1
,245
.25
1.46
0000
$1,4
60.0
0$1
,241
.00
1.46
0000
0.00
%$1
,460
.00
$1,2
41.0
01.
3734
00$1
,373
.40
$1,1
67.3
91.
4530
005.
80%
$1,4
53.0
0$1
,235
.05
1.41
8800
$1,4
18.8
0$1
,205
.98
1.43
2400
0.96
%$1
,432
.40
$1,2
17.5
41.
4180
00$1
,418
.00
$1,2
05.3
01.
4180
000.
00%
$1,4
18.0
0$1
,205
.30
1.43
0000
$1,4
30.0
0$1
,215
.50
1.41
0000
(1.4
0%)
$1,4
10.0
0$1
,198
.50
1.42
0000
$1,4
20.0
0$1
,207
.00
1.41
0000
(0.7
0%)
$1,4
10.0
0$1
,198
.50
1.41
0000
$1,4
10.0
0$1
,198
.50
1.41
0000
0.00
%$1
,410
.00
$1,1
98.5
01.
3700
00$1
,370
.00
$1,1
64.5
01.
4000
002.
19%
$1,4
00.0
0$1
,190
.00
1.33
0600
$1,4
40.0
0$1
,224
.00
1.32
3500
(0.5
3%)
$1,3
23.5
0$1
,124
.98
1.25
3300
$1,2
53.3
0$1
,065
.31
1.25
3300
0.00
%$1
,253
.30
$1,0
65.3
11.
3400
5010
.00%
$1,3
40.0
5$1
,005
.04
1.34
0050
0.00
%10
.00%
$1,3
40.0
5$1
,005
.04
1.29
0347
10.0
0%$1
,290
.35
$967
.76
1.28
2085
(0.6
4%)
10.0
0%$1
,282
.09
$961
.56
1.13
4200
20.0
0%$1
,134
.20
$737
.23
1.12
6700
(0.6
6%)
20.0
0%$1
,126
.70
$732
.36
201
3-14
hom
este
ad.
2013
-14
2012
-13
32