S A N C A R L O S C I T Y, N E G R O S O C C I D E N TA L

2013 STATE OF LOCAL GOVERNANCE REPORT

! !Republic of the Philippines !Province of Negros Occidental CITY OF SAN CARLOS

OFFICE OF THE CITY MAYOR

! October 13, 2014

DIR. MA. JOY MAREDITH R. MADAYAG, CSEE Provincial Director Department of the Interior and Local Government PAC Building, Aguinaldo Street Bacolod City

!

!

Dear Director Madayag:

We are submitting herewith the State of Local Governance Report (SLGR) of the City of San Carlos for the year 2013. We trust this complies with the requirement.

Best regards.

Very truly yours,

GERARDO P. VALMAYOR, JR.

City Mayor

 Republic of the Philippines  Province of Negros Occidental

CITY OF SAN CARLOS

OFF ICE OF THE C ITY MAYOR

Message

The year 2013 has been very productive for San Carlos City in terms of delivery of

basic services. However, we shall not consider these services as our ultimate

accomplishments and our reasons to sit on our laurels. There are still much to be desired

therefore so much to be done because true public service is not counted only in terms of our

present capacity and the quantity and quality of our programs and projects, it is also

measured in terms of results, that is, in the extent that these services have improved the lives

of the people we serve.

Our accomplishments are largely the result of our organization’s teamwork which

sustained the continuity and improvement of our existing services and programs and

promoted the delivery of new and novel ways of serving the public.

HON. GERARDO P. VALMAYOR, JR.

City Mayor

“A modern agro-industrial processing city, a model green city on good governance, a renewable energy hub for Asia, and a sustainable

tourism destination with strong, diverse and viable economy, and an ecologically balanced and sustainable environment with functional, appropriate and accessible infrastructure where citizens are healthy

and well educated, living in a harmonious and peaceful community, under a dynamic, competent, and reliable leadership in a safe,

adaptive and resilient city.”

To achieve food self-sufficiency and security, resource-based diversification and balanced agro-industrial and tourism

opportunities with educated, healthy and empowered citizenry in a livable, resilient community, providing opportunities for economic

development through sustainable renewable energy investments complemented with efficient and effective delivery of basic socio-economic services with infrastructure support, and strong public-private partnership for suitable and environmentally friendly

development programs under a dynamic leadership.

To achieve food self-suffiTo achieve food self-suffiTo achieve food self-su ciency and security, resource-based fficiency and security, resource-based ffidiversifidiversifidiversi cation and balanced agro-industrial and tourism fication and balanced agro-industrial and tourism fi

opportunities with educated, healthy and empowered citizenry in a livable, resilient community, providing opportunities for economic

development through sustainable renewable energy investments complemented with efficomplemented with efficomplemented with e cient and efficient and effi ffcient and effcient and e ective delivery of basic socio-ffective delivery of basic socio-ffeconomic services with infrastructure support, and strong public-private partnership for suitable and environmentally friendly

development programs under a dynamic leadership.

1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ADMINISTRATIVE GOVERNANCE 2

HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT 3 CUSTOMER SERVICE – CIVIL APPLICATIONS 6 ON RESOURCE ALLOCATION AND UTILIZATION 10 ON REVENUE GENERATION 12 ON LOCAL LEGISLATION 13 ON DEVELOPMENT PLANNING 22

SOCIAL GOVERNANCE 23

ON PEACE, SECURITY AND DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT 23 ON SUPPORT TO HOUSING AND BASIC UTILITIES 30 SUPPORT TO EDUCATION SERVICES 33 HEALTH SERVICES 37

ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE 44

ON SUPPORT TO AGRICULTURE SECTOR 45 ON SUPPORT TO FISHERY SERVICES 51 ON ENTREPRENEURSHIP, BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY PROMOTIONS 51

ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE 56

ON URBAN ECOSYSTEMS MANAGEMENT 57 FORES ECOSYSTEMS MANAGEMENT 57 FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS MANAGEMENT 59 COASTAL MARINE ECOSYSTEMS MANAGEMENT 60

VALUING FUNDAMENTALS OF GOVERNANCE 63

ON PARTICIPATION 64 FINANCIAL ACOUNTABILITY 65 TRANSPARENCY 66

FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE 67

COST TO COLLECT REVENUES 67 LOCALLY-SOURCED REVENUES TO TOTAL INCOME 67 REGULAR REVENUE TO TOTAL INCOME 68 LOCALLY SOURCED REVENUE LEVEL 68 LOCALLY-SOURCED REVENUE PER CAPITA 69 REAL PROPERTY TAX ACCOMPLISHMENT RATE 69 RESOURCE ALLOCATION AND UTILIZATION-PERSONAL SERVICES EXPENDITURE RATIO 70 TOTAL EXPENDITURE PER CAPITA 70

STATE OF PERFORMANCE (INPUT) 71

STATE OF PERFORMANCE (OUTPUT) 73

2

State of Local Governance Report

For the City Government of San Carlos, the performance and productivity indices for Calendar Year 2013 are summed up as follows:

Administrative Governance

Figure 1

Out of six (6) sub-areas, the city has an excellent performance in four (4) sub-areas such as Development Planning, Customer Service-Civil Applications and Human Resource Management and Development but it has High performance in Revenue Generation with4.60 and Local Legislation with 3.67.

The City has an excellent performance on the following:

• Human Resource Management and Development • Customer Service-Civil Applications • Resource Allocation and Utilization • Development Planning

5.00

5.00

4.67

5.00

5.00

5.00

4.50 4.55 4.60 4.65 4.70 4.75 4.80 4.85 4.90 4.95 5.00

LOCAL LEGISLATION

DEVELOPMENT PLANNING

REVENUE GENERATION

RESOURCE ALLOCATION AND UTILIZATION

CUSTOMER SERVICE-CIVIL APPLICATION

HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT

San Carlos City, PY 2013

Very Low 1 Low2 Fair/Medi

um 3

High 4 Excellent 5

Color

Adjectival Equivalent

Scale

3

Priority areas for improvement and needs to be done:

• Revenue Generation • Local Legislation

Human Resource Management and Development

The implementation of the following activities, project and/or program in CY 2013 had contributed to the attainment of an excellent rating in Human Resource Management and Development. In 2013 performance, recruitment and selection of new employees were transparent by following strict procedures in accordance to Civil Service Commission by submitting list of vacant positions, posting of vacancies of positions in different conspicuous places in the city. A total of 15 informational, trainings and seminars were conducted in 2013 with the following activities and number of participants

1. Re-orientation and Workshop on HR Plan = 37 pax 2. First-Aid Training = 30 pax 3. Seminar on Preventice Maintenance of Vehicle = 20 pax 4. Enhancement Seminar on Basic Correspondence = 24 pax 5. Orientation/Workshop on HR Plan & SPMS = 39 pax 6. Advocacy on Blood Letting, Dengue Awareness

and Lifestyle disease = 25 pax 7. Civil Registration Updates = 32 pax 8. Training/Workshop on Vegetables Pickling = 32 pax 9. Team Building for Admin Officers = 15 pax 10. Re-Orientation Seminar = 32 pax 11. Orientation on the New SALN = 50 pax 12. Project Documentation Seminar = 34 pax 13. GSIS Pre-Retirement Updates = 114 pax 14. Orientation for New Entrants = 32 pax 15. Hands-on Training on Database Mgt. System = 19 pax

4

Permanency in the nature of employment is valued because of 739 filled and unfilled positions a total of 605 were filled with 508 positions were permanent in nature of appointments. A total of 603 employees were employed in 2013 with different nature of appointment, 48 were coterminous, 32 contractuals, 13 elective, 4 temporary and 508 permanent employees. Levels of position: 1st Level 380, 2nd Level 225 Gender Profile as of December 31, 2013: Male 311, Female 292 Separated from the Service: Retired 16, Resigned 5, Deceased 2, Term expired 4 Healthy lifestyle and wellness program among state workers in the city, namely: Sports Fitness/Hataw; Pneumococcal Vaccination (August 28); Dengue Awareness (September 23); Tetanus toxoid Vaccine (December10) An orientation on Human Resource Plan and Strategic Performance Management System (SPMS) was also conducted by the Civil Service Commission Provincial Office last Oct. 16, 2013 facilitated by the Office for Human Resource Management (OHRM) leading to the creation of the Human Resource (HR) Planning Team composed of representatives from various departments of the city that enforces the submission of the department’s HR Plan.

New Entrants Orientation Seminar last February 11, 2013

at Consuelo Alger Community Center.

5

GSIS Pre-Retirement Updates last February 22, 2013 at SP Session Hall.

Civil Service Examination Mobile Application Assistance last February 28,

2013 at City Hall Lobby.

Project Documentation Seminar last February 28-30, 2013

at Consuelo Alger Community Center.

Pneumococcal Vaccine Immunization among employees last

August 28, 2013 at SP Session Hall.

6

Blood Donation Campaign last September 24, 2013 at SP Session Hall

Customer Service – Civil Applications

On Civil Registry Documents The Office of the City Civil Registrar is maintaining Philippine Civil Registry Information System (PhilCRIS) and DOS-based Civil Registry Information System (CRIS) and it is updated and maintained by the office. The city partnered with Philippine Statistics Authority (National Statistics Office) in the implementation of Batch Request System (BREQS) is a scheme where NSO authorizes the city to receive requests for NSO-issued copies and certifications of civil registry documents from the public and issue the documents to its clientele. The client don’t need to go to NSO Bacolod and spend more money just to get the civil documents. The OCCR created a facebook page in 2011 purposely to assists any person who intends to seek information and be guided on any concerns pertaining to civil registry related transactions particulary in the City of San Carlos. Procedures were clear and concise with few steps in accordance and presence of Citizen’s Charter. Posters and flyers are also present in the office for its needs of the clients. Courtesy lane for persons with disability, elderly, pregnant women and clients from far-flung barangays is visible in the office. The office is implementing No-Noon-Break policy. The one-day free issuances of births, marriages & deaths every month of February. Aside from Mobile Registration the utilization of Barangay Civil

7

Registration Agents (BCRA) has widened the reach of civil registration to far-flung barangays and schools.

On Real Property Documents The City Assessors Office is maintaining Enhanced Tax Revenue and Assessment Collection System (eTRACS) a system wherein accurate and efficient way of getting real property documents and inter-linked with City Treasurer’s Office for its real property tax collection. Procedures were clear and concise with few steps in accordance and presence of Citizen’s Charter. Posters and flyers are also present in the office for its needs of the clients. Courtesy lane for persons with disability, elderly, pregnant women and clients from far-flung barangays is visible in the office. The office is implementing No-Noon-Break policy. Implementation of Geographic Information System (GIS) linked to the operational Real Property Tax Administration database enables users to swiftly and accurately update parcel maps and at the same time reducing the previous time of one hour & thirty five (1 & 35) minutes transaction with clients to only thirty five (35) minutes.

Office of the City Assessor In 2013, a total of 1,150 real property documents were processed including 165 parcels newly discovered real properties, 31 parcels reclassified real properties, 120 parcels dispute/cleansed real properties, 391 parcels exempt to taxable real properties, 303 parcels transferred real properties. The city submitted draft of Proposed Schedule Market Value to BLGF- Central Office on April 24, 2013 for review and after some corrections was re-submitted on July 13, 2013 for final review. The Proposed Schedule of Market Value (SMV) was approved by BLGF- Central Office and certified on dated July 5, 2013, that it complied with the Local Government Code (R.A. No. 7160), Philippine Valuation Standard (PVS) issued under DOF Order No. 37-09, Mass Appraisal Guidebook (MAG) issued under DOF No. 10-2010 and Manual on Real Property Appraisal and Assessment

8

Operations (MRPAAO) issued under DOF Local Assessment Regulations (LAR No. 1-2007) and other existing regulations and guidelines. The City Assessor’s Office attended various trainings conducted by REGALA and DOF-BLGF, namely Training on the Conduct of Revenue Impact Study (BCMA Module 8), Jan. 14-18, 2013, Baguio City; Training on Updating of Real Property Assessment and Tax Records, Dec. 16-18, 2013, San Carlos City. Last December 12, 2013, the City Assessor’s Office was awarded Most Outstanding City Assessment Office in the region for CY 2012 for attaining the highest performance evaluation rating of 96.45% among the city assessment office in the region and was included in the Hall of Fame for having won as the Most Outstanding City Assessment Office in the region for three (3) consecutive years (2010, 2011 and 2012).

Office of the City Civil Registrar Documents registered in 2013 numbered: Live births - 4,012; Registered Deaths – 825; Marriages – 725; Applicants for Marriage License – 504; Petition Under R.A. 9048 – 191; Legal Instruments – 109; Court Decrees – 54.

Office of the Building Official (OBO) In 2013, there were 1,242 building permits were approved in the Office of the Building Official.

9

Business One-Stop Shop at the City Hall every January.

Blessing and Launching of Philhealth Express Center last February 22, 2014

at Jose Valmayor Jr.

Presence of Customer’s Assistance and Complaints Desk at City Hall.

10

On Resource Allocation and Utilization The city is responsive to the budgetary requirements of the Annual Investment Program because all projects in the budget were consistent with the approved 1 year AIP and part of the 5 year LDIP as approved by the Sangguniang Panlungsod in compliance to Sec. 17 of the LGC and other budgetary circulars were observed. No amount of appropriations for debt servicing since the city has not availed any loan from any banks or financial institutions. The city appropriated PhP 90, 372, 248.00 equivalent to 20% Development Fund for the development programs of the city for Economic Development, Environment and Ecological Security Program, Land and Land Improvements and Water Development Program. The city appropriated PhP 2,000 as an Aid to Barangays. Also, the city appropriated PhP 100,000 each to three (3) most depressed barangays identified in Barangays San Juan, Ermita and Barangay 4. The total amount of PhP 206,686.95 appropriated for discretionary purposes has not exceeded 2% of our actual next preceding year’s receipts from basic real property tax. The city appropriated PhP 62,302,768 for the Gender and Development (GAD) related projects/program/activities in compliance with RA 7192 and the Phil. Constitution and DBM-NEDA-NCRFW Joint Circular No. 99-4 s. 1999 and has exceeded the required minimum of 5% of the total appropriation. The city appropriated PhP 255, 031, 618.79 in Personal Services which did not exceed the 45% PS ceiling mandated by law. The city appropriated PhP 890,000 for the operation of Senior Citizens and Veterans Affairs Program in compliance to RA 9257. The city appropriated PhP 150,000 for the monitoring, surveillance and control of STI-HIV/AIDS.

11

The city submitted the 2014 Annual Budget on October 11, 2013 after comprehensive consultations with various departments and offices concerned of the local government and national agencies with funding from the LGU. Said budget was approved by Sangguniang Panlungsod on December 10, 2013 in Appropriation Ordinance No. 13-06, series of 2013 for General Fund and 22% Development Fund, and Appropriation Ordinance No. 13-07, series of 2013 for the various Special Accounts or the Economic Enterprises of the city namely; City Hospital Department, City Waterworks Department, Public Market and Slaughterhouse Department and Public Transport Terminal Division. All projects in the budget were consistent with the approved 1 year AIP was also part of the 5 year LDIP as approved by the Sangguniang Panlungsod. Compliance to Sec. 17 of the LGC and other budgetary circulars was being observed. Total expenditures and capital outlays equaled the estimated income since the local government unit observed zero-based budgeting. In accordance to LGC (RA 7160), provisions for all statutory and mandatory obligations was complied. To wit:

1. 20% Development Fund (derived from 20% of the IRA) 2. Full appropriations for all government positions filled and unfilled

with corresponding GSIS premiums 3. Aid to barangays was pegged at PhP 1,000.00 4. Discretionary fund did not exceed 2% of the actual receipts from

basic real property tax 5. Total appropriations for Personnel Services did not exceed the 45%

limitation 6. More than 5% or PhP 62,302,768.00 amount appropriated for

Gender and Development projects and activities 7. An amount of PhP 890,000.00 were appropriated for Senior Citizens

Affairs and Veterans Affairs Program for its operation and maintenance

8. An amount was appropriated for the monitoring and surveillance of the magnitude of AIDS

9. 1% of IRA was appropriated for the strengthening and implementation of the programs of the Local Council for the Protection of Children

12

On Revenue Generation The city has a higher dependency from external sources. More efforts to be done on tax revenue collection from RPT, business tax, and other taxes and also efforts in creating measures to enhance the non-tax revenues are those that come from regulatory fees, service/user charges, receipts from economic enterprise, toll fees and other receipts. Wide dissemination on information on incentive scheme to promote efficiency in real property assessment and real property tax collection. Mobilize the Local Enterprise and Investment Promotions Office in order to invite future investors and businessmen to invest in the city. The city’s local revenue code has embedded tax discounts or incentives on early payments of real property tax. The city’s Investment Code encourages the investors and businessment to invest in the city with incentive scheme that they can avail tax discounts and free from business permit according to the amount of investment poured in the city. City Ordinance No. 13-34 approved last December 2013 provided new rates for services and facilities at the City Hospital. The new rates cover charges for rooms, medical fees, ambulance, dental services, wound dressing, minor surgical procedures, laboratory services, radiologic services, and others. The rates for city residents (non-medicare and medicare) are lower than non-city residents. Regular employees of the city government admitted at the San Carlos City Hospital can avail of 20 percent discount of the total bill in excess of PhilHealth claims provided that this provision covers only the regular employees and not their immediate family or relatives.

13

On Local Legislation More efforts in creating ordinances or legislative actions that is inline with national policies that will benefit to the city and its constituents. Re-mobilize the legislative tracking system of the city.

Ordinance No. 13-33 Creating the Land Management Council and Land Management office, and Formalizing the City’s Initiated Systematic Land Titling Program Passing of Executive-Legislative Agenda City officials, heads formulate 3-year ELA. City officials and department heads, and concerned national offices attended a three-day workshop on Executive-Legislative Agenda (ELA) and Capacity Development (CAPDEV) last Aug. 6-8, 2013 to come up with a comprehensive 3-year development plan for the city conducted by DILG Local Gov’t Operations Officer VI of Cadiz City Ma. Corazon Omero assisted by J Dignadice, LGOO VI.

DILG Operations Officer VI of Cadiz City Ma. Corazon Omero (left) assisted by San Carlos City LGOO VI J Dignadice (center) brief city officials and participants on the what, why and how of ELA. In 2013, a total of 9 ordinances were tracked using the Legislative Tracking System with the approval of the following ordinances:

• Ord. No. 13-01: An Ordinance Creating the City Environment Management Office (CEMO) and providing for its Tasks, Functions, Personnel and Appropriation thereof and For Other Purposes;

14

• Ord. No. 13-03: An Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 10-21 by mandating the Care of Pregnant and Expectant Mothers to be under the City Health Office Personnel;

• Ord. No. 13-06: An Ordinance Providing for Rules and Standards, in the exercise of the Proprietary Right of the City Government Over the Operation and Maintenance of the Government Canteen, pursuant to Book I, Title One, Chapter 2, Section 18 of the Local Government Code and for other Purposes;

• Ord. No. 13-16: An Ordinance Providing for New Rates and Fees of the Officiating Officials of Sports Activities herein listed, thereby amending Section 3 of Ordinance No. 22, Series of 2004 and Section 1 of Ordinance No. 07, Series of 2009;

• Ord. No. 13-24: “An Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 10-17, Series of 2010 entitled The People’s Park Ordinance of 2010, Repealing Ordinance No. 16, Series of 2004 and For Other Purposes.

• Ord. No. 13-33: An Ordinance Creating The Land Management Council And Land Management Office Formalizing The Local Government Unit Initiated Systematic Land Titling Program;

• Ord. No. 13-36: An Ordinance Amending Section 8 (A.3) And Section 17 Of Ordinance No. 07-05, Otherwise Known As The 2006 Traffic Ordinance Of The City Of San Carlos, Negros Occidental;

• Ord. No. 13-34: New Rates for Hospital Fees and Services; • Ord. No. 13-35: San Carlos City Sanitation Code

In 2013, the Sangguniang Panlungsod were also tracked the following resolutions to wit:

1) Res. 13-03- MOA on NFA rice of credit 2) Res. 13-05- MOA with DA on FMR for Brgys. Bagonbon &

Codcod 3) Res. 13-06- Purchase of Garbage Truck w/ compactor for

CEMO 4) Res. 13-07- MOA w/ TSKMPC for loan assistance of P1M 5) Res. 13-08- Program of Works of four (4) projects 6) Res. 13-13- Transfer of funds to Brgy. Quezon 7) Res. 13-14- Program of Works of eight (8) projects 8) Res. 13-18- MOA on FLUP for the DENR-USAID-US 9) Res. 13-20- Purchase of parts & repair of D5 Bulldozer of

CEMO 10) Res. 13-21- REGALA activities 11) Res. 13-22- Counterpart Fund to the PAMANA Program 12) Res. 13-23- MOA w/ DA on improvement of barangay road 13) Res. 13-24- POW Lot 7 Circumferential Road Project

15

14) Res. 13-27-Various materials for the Philhealth Express Office

15) Res. 13-29- MOA w/ DA, Region 6, for one (1) corn mill 16) Res. 13-31- Purchase of printer for the COMELEC 17) Res. 13-32- Electrical Service Connection for SEP

beneficiaries 18) Res. 13-33- POW Const. of Bulkhead w/ dredging (Phase II) 19) Res. 13-35- Transfer of funds to Brgy. I 20) Res. 13-46- Contract of Affiliation with CSR for trainings of

midwifery, nursing aides & caregivers students at the City Hospital

21) Res. 13-51- Purchase of 8 sets 2-way wall mounted speaker & IT equipment for SP Office

22) Res. 13-52 - Program of Works for five (5) projects 23) Res. 13-53-Access road development P440,000 per CDC

Res. No. 13-01 24) Res. 13-55- PDAF from Sen. Loren Legarda for scholarship

program 25) Res. 13-57- Membership Agreement with RAMESES Systems,

Inc. 26) Res. 13-58-Program of Works for two (2) projects in Sipaway 27) Res. 13-59-Purchase of Outdoor lighted signage, etc. for

PhilHealth 28) Res. 13-66-POW for rehabilitation of jetmatic hand pump 29) Res. 13-68-Purchase of service vehicle for the SP Office 30) Res. 13-76-POW for the electrification of Iliranan Elem.

School 31) Res. 13-77- POW for three (3) projects 32) Res. 13-79- POW for repair of the City Hospital for

P708,000.00 33) Res. 13-80-MOA w/ VRESCO for electrical poles at Brgy.

Rizal 34) Res. 13-83-POW of electrical poles at So. Tagda, Brgy.

Nataban 35) Res. 13-85-MOA with ANP for Ourfood-Negros Program 36) Res. 13-86-MOA with BPI-LGNCRDC on farm trials 37) Res. 13-88-Program of Works for three (3) projects 38) Res. 13-89-POW- Construction/Installation of electrical

poles at So. Maragoos Brgy. Nataban 39) Res. 13-93 – MOA-opening of Trust Fund Accounts for BUB

and Pamana Programs of DA 40) Res. 13-100-MOA with PSPI in the conduct of bilateral tubal

ligation

16

41) Res. 13-103-MOA with DSWD for allocation in the BUB of DSWD

42) Res. 13-104- MOA with DA for Integrated Organic Agriculture

43) Res. 13-109-Purchase of Personal Computer w/ Printer for CARCC

44) Res. 13-111-Purchase of personal computers & printers for the MQC division

45) Res. 13-112-Purchase of personal computers & printers for Task Force Osprey and for the San Carlos PNP

46) Res. 13-113-MOA with BFAR for Seaweed Culture Project 47) Res. 13-114- Purchase of Lot (Augusto Villa) 48) Res. 13-117- Program Of Work for four (4) projects 49) Res. 13-118-Purchase of various office equipment/supplies

for different offices 50) Res. 13-119-Funding for establishment of Loafing Area in

So. Medina, Brgy. Rizal 51) Res. 13-120-Purchase of office equipment for use of the

CLUP, FLUP and CDP 52) Res. 13-122-MOA with VRESCO for the

Construction/Installation of electrical poles at So. Tagda, Brgy. Nataban

53) Res. 13-123-MOA with VRESCO for the Construction/Installation of electrical poles at So. Marago-os, Brgy. Nataban

54) Res. 13-124-MOA with VRESCO for the Construction/Installation of electrical poles at the City Hall

55) Res. 13-125-POW for the construction of additional classrooms at Julio Ledesma National High School

56) Res. 13-126-POW for the Installation of air-conditioning units at the City Treasurer’s Office

57) Res. 13-128-POW for the land forming of the City Hospital Project

58) Res. 13-130-Purchase of computer monitor for the Prosecutor’s Office

59) Res. 13-131-Purchase of a multi-media projector for the ITCS Office

60) Res. 13-132-CDC Resolution No. 13-16, Series Of 2013, appropriating Three Hundred Thirty Thousand Pesos (=P=330,000.00) for the purchase of Consumerism Materials in the City Waterworks;

61) Res. 13-133- CDC Resolution No. 13-15, Series Of 2013, construction of multi-purpose concrete pavement at So. Lagha, Brgy. Quezon, in the amount of =P=450,000.00;

17

62) Res. 13-134–POW for two (2) projects: (1) On-Site Relocation and Rehabilitation of Affected Houses and Structures at Brgy. San Juan, this city, in the amount of =P=1,280,000.00; (2) Construction of Drainage System at Brgy. VI Relocation Site (Phase II), at Reclamation Project, Brgy. VI, this city, in the amount of =P=3,600,000.00;

63) Res. 13-136- POW for the acquisition of Lot 2-B 64) Res. 13-138- POW for the construction of a 390 cubic meter

reinforced concrete Sit-In Reservoir at the boulevard, Brgy. VI, this city, in the amount of =P=3,700,000.00;

65) Res. 13-139- MOA with Mr. Anselmo P. Cabrera (FUP Specialist), in the completion of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) of San Carlos City;

66) Res. 13-140- CDC Resolution No. 13-10, Series Of 2013, development of high value commercial crops’ a special project for the Upland Farmers worth Three Hundred Twenty Seven Thousand Pesos (P327,000.00);

67) Res. 13-141- MOA With Agtutunoy Mayupo, Mayana And Aguikit, Bago Watershed Integrated Farmers Association, Inc. (Amma, Bwifai);

68) Res. 13-143- POW for the procurement of submersible motors in the amount of =P=665,000.00;

69) Res. 13-155- POW for the repair and rehabilitation of canter sgv 819 in the amount of =P=300,000.00;

70) Res. 13-156- CDC Resolution No. 13-18 Series Of 2013, construction of secondary perimeter fence and concrete pathway at BJMP Compound, San Carlos City, in the amount of =P=300,000.00;

71) Res. 13-159- MOA with the Department of Health, Center for Health Development (DOH-CHD)-Western Visayas, relative to the Unified Health Management Information System (UHMIS);

72) Res. 13-160- MOA with the Government of the Philippines, Through Ms. Adeluisa G. Siapno, Regional Executive Director, Department Of Environment And Natural Resources (DENR), Region VI, relative to the LGU-LED Systematic Public Land Titling Program;

73) Res. 13-162- POW for two (2) projects: (1) concreting of road Lot 1, left road of Stage 2 of Phase IV, Fatima Village, with sidewalk, curb & gutter, =P= 2,520,000.00); and (2) Revised POW for the Installation of Air-Conditioning System at the City Treasurer’s Office from 3 units to 4 units (3 sets ceiling-mounted and 1 unit wall-mounted) in the total amount of =P=394,200.00);

18

74) Res. 13-164-MOA with the Dept. Of Agriculture, RFY VI, Iloilo City, for the establishment of Plant Nursery under the High Value Crops Development Program (HVCDP), in the total amount of P 114,182.34

75) Res. 13-165- Request of the Solid Waste Management Office for appropriation in the amount of =P=185,000.00 for the repair and maintenance of Garbage Compactor with Plate No. SHW 535;

76) Res 13-166- Purchase of one (1) unit Personal Computer, one (1) unit Laptop and one (1) unit Printer for the Public Employment Service Office (PESO) in the total amount of =P=69,200.00;

77) Res. 13-169- Deed Of Donation, with Mr. George S. Uy, for one (1) unit Garbage Compactor, in the amount of P750,000.00;

78) Res. 13-178- Purchase of flexible couplings and UPVC Pipes for the repair and maintenance of the city’s water system in the total amount of =P=293,965.00;

79) Res. 13-185- CDC Resolution No. 13-20 Series Of 2013, approving the request for appropriation for the rehabilitation of waterline from So. Minaabay to So. Mangkalasag, Brgy. Palampas, in the amount of =P=36,000.00;

80) Res. 13-186- POW for the construction of Public Market Office and Sports Office with comfort and dressing room at Purok Ilang-Ilang, Brgy. Quezon, in the amount of =P=250,000.00;

81) Res. 13-187- POW for the conversion of old sanitary office into Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program Office, 2nd Floor, Public Market Building, in the amount of =P=259,900.00;

82) Res. 13-188- Request of the San Carlos City PNP to use the excess amount of =P=33,831.00 from the appropriation intended to purchase three (3) units Personal Computer and Printer, to purchase an additional two (2) units Personal Computer (CPU Components Only);

83) Res. 13-193- POW for the dispersal and upgrading of native goats, in the amount of =P=50,000.00.

84) Res. 13-205– CDC Resolution Nos. 13-17, 13-19 And 13-23, Series Of 2013, approving different projects of the city;

85) Res 13-207-POW for The Electrification (Wiring Installation And Energization) Of The Health Center, So. Katiclan, Brgy. Rizal, In The Amount Of =P=64,000.00;

19

86) Res 13-209- General Overhauling Of The L300 Alpha (Plate # SGC 675) in the amount of P70,540.00;

87) Res 13-210- Purchase Of One (1) Unit Concrete Cutter In The Amount Of =P=70,000.00;

88) Res 13-217- MOA with The Dept. Of Social Welfare And Development Relative To The Implementation Of The Sustainable Livelihood Project (SLP) Under The Bottom-Up Budgeting 2013

89) Res 13-218- Financial Assistance of P250,000.00 for the Construction Of Comfort Room At The Boxing Gym, Brgy. VI

90) Res 13-223- MOA With DENR And Barangays Prosperidad, Rizal, Bagonbon And Nataban Relative To The Barangay Forest Program;

91) Res 13-229- Financial Assistance of P250,000.00 for the Construction Of Its Public Market Office And Sports Office With Comfort And Dressing Rooms, Brgy. Quezon

92) Res 13-230- CDC Resolution Nos. 13-22 And 13-24, Series Of 2013 approving different projects of the city;

93) Res 13-231-POW for The Pipe Laying Of UPVC Pipe And Installation Of One (1) Unit Stub-Out At Eco-Tourism National Highway With An Appropriation Of =P=30,500.00;

94) Res 13-235- MOA With DENR And Barangay Codcod, This City, Relative To The Barangay Forest Program ;

95) Res. 13-250–MOA with applicant beneficiary for the land titling program of pilot projects in Brgy. VI, Brgy. Guadalupe and Brgy. San Juan, Sipaway;

96) Res 13-258- Work And Financial Plan For The Post Survey Activities And Processing Of Patents/Titles Of Identified Public Residential Lands Located At Brgys. VI, San Juan And Guadalupe, all of San Carlos City, Negros Occidental;

97) Res 13-238- MOA With The Community Environment And Natural Resources (CENRO), Relative To The Allocation Of Funds For The Titling Program Of Pilot Projects In Brgys. VI, Guadalupe And San Juan Sipaway;

98) Res 13-241- Program Of Works For The Two Projects Of The City Government Of San Carlos:

a. Development of C-3 Road near SCBI Plant Presidential Bridge to Vasconia Road, Brgy. Palampas, 20% Development Fund (Road Development Program, CY 2013) in the amount of =P= 1,600,000.00

20

b. Rehabilitation of 22 units cubicles (Comfort Rooms) at the City Auditorium Lump Sum Appropriation CY 2013 in the amount of =P= 83,575..00

99) Res 13-261- MOU with the Philippine Overseas Employment Administration (POEA), The Overseas Workers Welfare Administration (OWWA), The Dept. Of Labor & Employment (DOLE) and the Technical Education & Skills Development Authority (TESDA), relative to the Protection and Support of Overseas Workers;

100) Res 13-259- POW for the Rehabilitation of Aglolo-Od Waterline, Brgy. Palampas, in the amount of =P=550,000.00;

101) Res 13-255- To utilize a portion of the Reclamation Area for the proposed Construction of San Carlos City Malnutrition and Rehabilitation Center and a portion of the People’s Park for the proposed Construction of Children’s Museum and Learning Center Funded By National Expenditures Program (NEP), FY 2013;

102) Res 13-251- MOA with Nabingkalan Tricycle Operators and Drivers Association (NATODA) and San Carlos City Pedicab Operators and Drivers Association (SCAPODA), this city, relative to the livelihood projects for Transport Group;

103) Res 13-272 - CDC Resolution No. 13-29, Series of 2013, Approving The Request For Funding Augmentation Needed To Implement IEC (Citywide Barangays And Schools ESWM Capacity Building And Re-Orientation);

104) Res 13-236 – POW for the Vegetable Production Program At Acida, So. Medina, in the amount of =P=50,000.00;

105) Res. 13-275–MOA with Vresco- construction of one (1) unit primary pole at Jose Valmayor, Jr. Public Market, Brgy. IV, this city

106) Res. 13-274-implementation of CDC Res. No. 13-28, for the purchase of food and non-food items, to be used in times of emergencies

107) Res. 13-281- POW- construction of board walk and gazebo, people’s park, Brgy. III, in the amount of =P=1,400,000.00;

108) Res 13-288 - financial assistance to the victims of typhoon Yolanda, charged against the special trust fund of the local disaster risk reduction and management fund;

109) Res. 13-289 – Renaming the San Carlos City BJMP to San Carlos City District BJMP

21

110) Res 13-290 - with University Of St. La Salle, relative to the implementation of the school feeding program of Busog, Lusog Talino (The “Program”)

111) Res13-293 - financial assistance to Barangay III, this city, in the amount of =P=120,000.00 to subsidize the purchase of NFA rice, medicines and medical instruments for the use of their constituents

112) Res 13-294 - financial assistance to Barangay V, this city, in the amount of =P=100,000.00 to subsidize the various projects of the barangay

113) Res 13-305 – implementation of Organic Agriculture Farming System Project

114) Res 13-306 – POW- fabrication of 2-units steel grill at the Post Office

115) Res 13-297 – transfer of funds to Brgys. Bagonbon, Buluangan and Palampas

116) Res 13-295 – purchase of computer units for the GSD and the CLDO

117) Res 13-298 – granting incentives to rice farmers relative to rice production

118) Res 13-300 – transfer of funds to Brgys. I, II, II and V 119) Res 13-314 – loan assistance for the carabao project of the

NFPA, Brgy. Codcod 120) Res 13-310 – transfer of funds to Brgy. Ermita 121) Res 13-308 - POW-installation of CCTV with recorder for

BJMP 122) Res 13-307 – purchase of 100pcs plastic tables for the City

Auditorium

22

On Development Planning

• Development planning, structures, consultative process and planning databases which are highly facilitatives in the preparation of updating of land use and development plans are in place.

o Presence of Annual Investment Plan, 3-Year Local

Development Investment Plan, Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Executive-Legislative Agenda, Comprehensive Development Plan, 20 Year Master Development Plan and Ecological Profile of the city with corresponding SP Resolutions.

o Existence of City Development Council by virtue of Executive Order No. 92 s 2013. with Functional or Sectoral Committees

o Existence and use of Geographic Information System which is maintained by City Planning and Development Coordinator’s Office and City Assessor’s Office for their parcellary and development plans

Use of Geographic Information System (GIS) as a tool in planning, monitoring and evaluation of various programs and projects of the city and maintained by the City Planning and Development Coordinator’s Office (CPDO)

22

Various maps of the city using Geographic Information System (GIS).

23

Social Governance

Figure 2

The City has an excellent performance on the following:

• Support to Housing and Basic Utilities • Support to Education Services • Health Services

The city has to look on Peace, Security and Disaster

Risk Management.

On Peace, Security and Disaster Risk Management

The city has to look on the following: On Support to Katarungang Pambarangay, the city should appropriate financial assistance or benefits like allowances, insurance coverage and others and included in the annual budget of the city. Per Section 422 of the Local Government Code, mandated that the city shall provide appropriations for the effective implementation of the Katarungang Pambarangay.

5.00

5.00

5.00

4.75

0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00

HEALTH SERVICES

SUPPORT TO EDUCATION SERVICES

SUPPORT TO HOUSING AND BASIC UTILITIES

PEACE, SECURITY AND DRM

San Carlos City, PY 2013

Very Low 1 Low 2 Fair/Medi

um 3

High 4 Excellent 5

Color Code

Adjectival Equivalent

Scale

24

The City Social Welfare & Dev’t. Office launched the second Millennium Development Goals-Family-based Actions on Children and their Environs in the Slums (MDG-FACES) project at So. Lawis, Brgy. Buluangan last March 26, 2013 as expansion of the city’s MDG-FACES Program launched in August 2012. Forty children 3 to 17 years old and their parents are the program beneficiaries of said expansion project. The first implementation of the program covered 60 children beneficiaries and their guardians at San Juan Baybay, Zone 1, Brgy. VI. To ensure coordination in the enforcement of laws and ordinances enacted by the Sangguniang Panlungsod, City Mayor Gerardo P. Valmayor, Jr. created the San Carlos City Law Enforcement Team (LET) through Executive Order No. 34 series of 2013 dated June 6, 2013 as amended by Executive Order No. 97 series of 2013 dated October 21, 2013. LET is at the forefront in the implementation of the city’s laws and ordinances. The representatives of City Legal Office and San Carlos PNP were designated Chairman and Co-Chairman, respectively, of the team who are responsible for planning, supervision and execution of its tasks and functions. LET is responsible for the enforcement of ordinances on sidewalk vending; garbage disposal and anti-littering; illegal construction on sidewalks and government properties, obstructions and encroachments of city streets including national roads within the jurisdiction of the city; abatement of nuisance; illegal slaughtering; market ordinance; health and sanitary regulations; anti-smoking ordinance; business permits and monitoring of selected prime commodities; implementation of projects funded under capital outlay (General Fund and Lumpsum-Gen. Fund), 20% Development Fund, Local School Board fund and City Waterworks Department fund; monitoring the operation of small- scale mining, sand and gravel and other quarry resource utilization within the city; and traffic laws and ordinances, and others as directed by the city mayor. Even with LET, departments concerned are still responsible for the proper implementation of ordinances within their jurisdiction. The members of LET are representatives of departments and offices of City Engineering, City Treasurer, Business Permits & Licensing, City Health, General Services, Public Market and Slaughterhouse, City Mayor’s, City Disaster Risk Reduction & Management, City Environment Management,

25

City Agriculture, Traffic Management Authority, ABC President, Chairman of barangay concerned, at least four policemen designated by the Station Commander in consultation with City Legal Office, and, if and when necessary, additional city employees/job order workers/barangay tanods upon recommendation of the chairmen. The San Carlos City Task Force Right of Way, Traffic Management Authority, and Permits and Licenses Joint Inspection Team, among others, will continue to exercise their tasks and functions under their respective ordinances and executive orders in coordination with LET.

San Carlos City Most Supportive LGU to PNP The local police station, on the other hand, is a constant awardee for Best Police Station in the regional and provincial level since 2001. More than P1.4M was spent by the city government in 2013 to provide the local police with equipment and supplies to improve its mobility and fire power last Jan. 21, 2013. These consist of one canter truck costing P950,000 for upland barangay operations; 2 XRM-125 Motorcycles at P72,000 each for SWAT Team operations, and various firepower and other supplies worth P395,700 consisting of two M4-5.56 mm Rifles; assorted handgun ammunitions and four ceiling fans. Due to its continuing support to the local police, San Carlos City was cited by the PNP as the only LGU in Western Visayas to have extended outstanding support to PNP.

Turn-over of vehicle, fireams, munitions and motorcycles to PNP for their

mobilization and strengthening peace and order in the city. San Carlos City gained another Plaque of Appreciation from the Philippine National Police as Most Supportive LGU in Region 6. The award was given during the culmination program commemorating the 18th Police Community Relations Month last July 29, 2013 at Camp Martin Delgado, Iloilo City. PNP bestowed the award to the city in recognition of its constant support to the local police especially in accomplishing its goal

26

in carrying out their impact projects including “Paaralan Mo, Mahal Ko ”, a school based project aimed at suppressing crime rate among school youth by promoting responsible citizenship thru conducts of sustainable and realistic activities in school every month. The city government honored winners of the 2013 Western Visayas Regional Search for Most Outstanding Tanod, namely Brgy. V as first runner-up, Group Category, and Chief Tanod Desiderio Enarciso as first runner-up, Individual Category, in simple ceremony during the flag raising ceremony at City Hall last October 14, 2013. The San Carlos City Anti-Drug Abuse Council conducted symposiums on drug abuse among graduating high school students of the various public and private secondary schools in the city. Discussed during the symposiums include ill effects of illegal drug abuse, kinds of drugs and paraphernalia, illegal drug laws and penalties, spiritual development and others.

City celebrates first Disaster Consciousness Month The first Disaster Consciousness Month was celebrated in the city last July 8-28, 2013 with the theme “Ligtas na Bayan, Maunlad na Pamayanan.” The various activities included the signing of commitment by the city government and various rescue groups in the city, followed by the blessing of new medical and rescue tools and equipment of CDRRMO, some of which were donated to Bureau of Fire Protection (shown in picture below, right) like 2 gated Y connectors, 2 piston grip nozzles, 2 folding stretchers, 12 first aid kits, 2 axes, 1sledgehammer, 3 sleeping bags, 2 coolers and 3 canopy tents. Also held were: 5-day Standard First Aid & Basic Life Support Training of 30 city government employees, July 8-12 as emergency responders during calamities and emergencies especially in the workplace and within their areas of residences, fire safety drill and orientation on the basic disaster risk reduction and management at the barangays on July 15, orientation on utilization of disaster fund among various barangay officials and personnel on July 22, training on proper usage of handheld radios for 61 emergency responders, rescuers and barangay personnel in cooperation with National Telecommunications Commission last July 26, rescue olympics among public secondary schools and others to make the city a disaster-resilient city.

27

CDRRMO acquires new rescue, heavy equipment The City Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Office acquired new

rescue paraphernalia and heavy equipment in 2013 such as blood pressure apparatus, sphygmomanometer, CPR training mannequins, CPR pumps, rappelling gears, rechargeable flashlights, long boards, one motorcycle, one payloader and one 14-tonner dump truck.

CDRRMO newly-acquired vehicles and rescue equipments. On Disaster Relief Operations, the Office in coordination with the LGU, SCCDRRMO and Resource Augmentation from DSWD-National extended relief and rehabilitation services to a total of 3,277 families and 12,712 individuals who were victims of 2 Fire incidences which happened in January 12, 2013 with 80 families and 249 individuals affected and November 28, 2013 with 23 affected families and 80 individuals affected, and 3,174 families and 12,383 individuals affected by Super Typhoon Yolanda last November 8, 2013. The total funds released to assist said families/individuals is more or less 2,077,000.00 from the City of which 1,727,000.00 extended as financial assistance 350,000.00 for food items and family packed worth 500,000.00 from DSWD; 300,000.00 from NGOs, local and international NGOs all are food and non -food items. Disaster preparedness gets a boost. Around 400 employees of the city government underwent earthquake drill last March 22 after which 50 day care workers of the city were subjected to orientation on disaster preparedness and mitigation last Feb. 15, 2013.

28

The city government constructed an overflow at Sitio Agmaula, Brgy. Nataban which was inaugurated on Feb. 26, 2013. The project cost

P790,000 (above). Construction of Toilet, Bath and Kitchen Facilities at Barangay Punao Evacuation Center – July 30, 2013 and at Barangay I Evacuation Center – Sept. 30, 2013 The Bureau of Fire Protection in San Carlos City conducted various fire exit drills throughout the year 2013 among commercial establishments, schools and volunteer fire fighters and rescuers. These include Bank of the Phil. Islands on Sept. 19, Gaisano San Carlos on Nov. 29, Colegio de Sta. Rita on December 10, and held the Modified Firefighting Training on Nov. 15-17 for volunteer rescue personnel. The Human Rights Desk exist to promote and protect the rights of an individual. The PNP maintains the “Quality Service Lane” (QSL) at the Police Station for fast, comfortable, stress free, convenient and friendly environment while they seek assistance at the station and a child-friendly Women and Children Protection Desk. The PNP also conducted: 36 pulong-pulong/dialogue/symposium, 15 anti-drug operation and 12 illegal logging operation.

29

Barangay 5 fire victims assistance from the city and Gentlemen’s Club last

January 18, 2013 at SOF Building.

City assistance to Philippine Red Cross Negros Chapter to Typhoon Pablo

last January 17, 2013 at Mayor’s Office

Earthquake Drill at the City Hall last March 15, 2013.

Incident Briefing of TS Yolanda last November 11, 2013 at Mayor’s Office

30

On Support to Housing and Basic Utilities The city maintains a database for the housing sector. The San Carlos City Integrated Housing Authority (SCIHA) under the City Mayor’s Office with an annual budget of PhP 279,040 for its operation and maintenance. The SCIHA core function is to maintain databases on identification of informal settlers and makeshift houses, prospecting potential sites for socialized housing. Also the office is also maintaining a database on households with access to water supply in coordination with City Waterworks Department and database on households with access with electricity in coordination with a local electric cooperative and City Engineering Department. The Local Housing Board (LHB) and San Carlos Integrated Housing Authority (SCIHA) was established in March 21, 2011 to serve as the policy–making body of the socialized housing program and shelter policies of the city and overall urban development program. In 2013, the city’s Homelot Program got a boost with the following:

• Passage of SP Res. No. 13-163 entitled “Approving the City of San Carlos Shelter Plan for the period 2012-2020”

• Passage of Ordinance No. 13-33 creating the Land Management Council and Land Management Office, and Formalizing the City’s Initiated Systematic Land Titling Program,

• Passage of Executive Order No. 15, Creating and Organizing

the Land Tenure Improvement Planning (LTIP), Technical Working Group of the LGU to secure land ownership, formulate land policies and administer land resources, establish cadastral data banks for legal, fiscal and economic administration of private and public lands, among others.

• Purchase of 2.5929 ha. land at Brgy. Rizal as additional area for Socialized Housing Program housing project.

• Signing of Memorandum of Partnership (MOPA) between the city and DENR Region VI to support of the intent of DENR Administrative Order No. 2011-06 (Prescribing the guidelines for implementation of public land titling in partnership w/ LGU’s). This is the first step towards the government’s

31

commitment for a long-term public Land Titling Program, aimed at alleviating poverty by improving the security of land tenure and sustaining economic growth. One of the components of the program is the implementation of tenure security involving the titling of Alienable and Disposable (A and D) Lands in San Carlos City.

• Passage of E.O. No. 82, s. of 2013 recognizing the City’s Local Housing Board as the policy-making body of the socialized housing program and shelter policies of the city.

• Signing of the MOA between the city and CENRO (Cadiz City), regarding the preparation of survey return and approval of subdivision plan of land parcel’s and other related activities for thirty (30) portions of public lands inhabited by several persons who have long established their permanent residences thereat located at Lot 203 at Brgy. Guadalupe wherein Survey Returns were approved last December 26, 2013 and individual Land Titles were being processed), Lot 667 at Brgy. San Juan, and Public Land at Brgy. VI.

(Left photo) shows the signing of deed of absolute sale of 2.5929 has. lot for socialized housing at Brgy. Rizal worth P10.2 million by City Mayor Gerardo P. Valmayor, Jr. (left) and Augusto Villa (center) last June 21, 2013 (above) at the City Mayor’s Office.

(Right) Some new lot owners of the city’s Homelot Program pose with City Mayor Ginggo Valmayor and proudly showing their lot titles. The city’s Integrated Housing Authority office facilitated the release of said titles.

32

Having fully paid their lots in installment, 10 beneficiaries of the city’s Homelot Program at Brgy. Rizal and another 6 beneficiaries received their individual lot title last June 17, 2013 and Sept. 23, 2013, respectively.

Water Services The Sipaway Water Supply Project:

Blessing of the Sipaway Water Supply Project, Phase 1 was on Jan. 5, 2013 which mainly focused on bringing water across the sea from the mainland to the island budgeted at P18.3 million (P5million from Provincial Government and P13.3million from the city). 237 meters of pipelines on dry land, 2,382 meters pipeline on the seabed across Tañon Strait to Brgy. San Juan and 5 faucets were installed with the barangay officials taking charge in selling water at 1 peso per 20-liter container, a far cry from the 10 to 15 pesos that the islanders used to pay for a 20-liter container of water bought from the mainland.. The Sipaway Water Supply Project is not finished until water flows from individual faucets in the houses of the residents.

Happy Sipaway residents fetching water from newly installed

communal faucet.

Switch-on Ceremony at So. Tinorongan, Brgy. Quezon last January 1, 2013.

33

Support to Education Services The Local School Board is existing and functional per EO No. 57 s. 2013 with the following composition: Chairman : HON. GERARDO P. VALMAYOR, JR. City Mayor Co-Chairman : CYNTHIA G. DEMAVIVAS Schools Division Superintendent Members : HON. FLEUR DE LIS V. MASCUÑANA

SP Member and Chairman, SP Committee on Education, Arts & Culture

ATTY. AMY GRACE O. BOLIVAR, CPA

City Treasurer THE SK FEDERATION PRESIDENT

THE PRESIDENT, Confederated Parents-Teachers Association (PTA)

DR. CRISTINA F. BAHINTING

President, San Carlos City Public School Teachers & Employees Association (SCCPSTEA)

MS. MORITA M. LASTIMOSO

President, Non-Teaching Personnel of the Public Schools in the City

Secretary : MR. WILLIAM G. VERGANTIÑOS Education Supervisor I, MSEP, DepEd The board has an organized agenda, with minutes and attendance and well documented.

34

In 2013, a total of 6 school-building and related DepEd projects were rehabilitated and improved.

1. Rehabilitation of floor Elevation, Partition, Windows, Doors and Roofing of Cory – Type 3 Classroom Building at Andres Bonifacio E/S – Completed March 27, 2013

2. Rehabilitation of 3 classroom Building at Lagha Main E/S – Completed April 25, 2013

3. Rehabilitation and Improvement of Four Classroom Building at Bagonbon National High School – Completed May 31, 2013

4. Rehabilitation and Repainting of DepEd Division Office – Completed Jan. 31, 2013

5. Improvement/Landscaping of DepEd Ground – Completed Jan. 17, 2013

6. Repainting of Gabaldon Building converted into DepEd Library Hub – Completed July 15, 2013

In 2013, a total of 3,002 pre- school children were enrolled at day care centers in all 18 barangays, however, a number of centers still lack the necessary facilities while day care workers could really benefit from more trainings to further enhance their abilities. The Alternative Learning System (ALS) accredited 49 learning centers in the different parts of the city and in far flung areas catering the needs of the out-of- school youth and out-of school children. In elementary level, the ratios of pupils per teacher and classroom are generally better than the ideal ratio of 1:45 at the average of 31.33 pupils per teacher and 31.59 pupils per classroom. For the secondary level, the student-teacher ratio is one teacher for every forty- five students. The critical input in terms of teacher was improved with the addition of 18 new elementary teacher items and 48 for the secondary schools for the year 2013. To make education accessible to all, various special education programs were conducted to varying learners, namely, Special Academic Programs: Monograde classes with 22,711 learners, Arabic Language and Islamic Values Education (ALIVE) Program – 28, Special Education (SpEd) – 79, Kindergarten Classes – 2,144, Kindergarten Summer Program with Early Childhood Education – 1,077.

35

As to the Alternative Learning System (ALS), the year 2013 completers numbered 2,609 distributed as follows: Basic Literacy Program – 198, Accreditation & Equivalent Program- Elementary – 247, Accreditation & equivalency Program- Secondary – 1,779, Informal Education – 385. San Carlos City LGU appropriation to education for F.Y. 2013 was P14,690,311.00.

The city government inaugurated the newly renovated 3-classroom building at Lagha Elementary Sch., Brgy. Quezon costing P471,767 (left) and the city’s P193,000 electrification project at Cabunao Elementary Sch., Brgy. Palampas switched-on last July 17 (right) Aside from these, the City Mayor Valmayor also turned-over the P295,841 worth 4-seater comfort room of Codcod Elem. School, Brgy. Codcod.

Blessing of 4-seater Comfort Rooms at Codcod Elementary School last

June 21, 2013 at Bgy. Codcod.

36

Rehabilitation of 3 classroom Building at Lagha Main Elementary School

completed last April 25, 2013.

Switch-on Ceremony at Cabunao Elementary School last July 17, 2013 at

Bgy. Palampas, San Carlos City.

Distribution of school supplies from Pag-Aaral ng Bata para sa

Kinabukasan (Education for the Children’s Future) - Livelihoods, Education, Advocacy & Protection to Reduce Child Labor in Sugarcane Areas

(ABK-LEAP) last August 14, 2013 at Bgy. Rizal.

37

Health Services TB Control Program. Of the 146 TB cases in 2013, 135 were cured resulting to 92 percent TB Cure Rate Nutrition Program (Garantisadong Pambata)

1. Vitamin A supplementation a) In 2013 (3,155)-91% 6- 11 months b) In 2013 (25,406)-93% 12- 59 months c) In 2013 (32,160)-93% 6- 71 months (deworming)

2. Vitamin Supplementation

a) In 2013 127 0- 5 children 3rd & 4th degree malnourished b) In 2013 102 0- 23 children 3rd & 4th degree malnourished

Implemented Newborn Screening

1. In 2013 452-97% No. of Children given Newborn Screening Procedure Community Based Rehabilitation Program: The Community Based Rehabilitation Program (CBR) of the City Health Office is designed to provide accurate and professional services to patients that require rehabilitation management with an annual allocation of One Hundred Fifty Thousand Pesos (PhP 150,000.00) to include the services of a Registered Physical Therapist, who conducted two (2) visits per month to patients. Likewise, provision for initial drugs for various cases is also given. Below is the consolidated Report of CBR cases mitigated and managed by the City Health Office. Maternal Health Program: The passage of Ordinance No. 13-03 controlling the services of traditional birth attendants commonly termed as “Hilots” is one intervention of the LGU that reduces maternal mortality. However, CHO has one registered maternal death for CY 2013. CHO continue to address the maternal health program by providing related health practices to ensure the safety of the mother and the unborn. Table below shows the services:

1. In 2013 1,508 = 32% Pregnant women availed at least 4 antenatal visits

2. In 2013 947= 20% Pregnant women had at least 2 doses of tetanus toxoid immunization

3. In 2013 1,800 = 38% Pregnant women have taken complete dose of iron

38

a. supplementation – at least 6 months (reported after the 180 tablets)

4. In 2013 1,934= 94% Deliveries were attended by skilled birth attendants (doctors/nurses/midwives)

5. In 2013 1,685 = 90% Deliveries were done at health facilities (hospitals/private clinics/health Centers)

Child Health Services: Adherence to the Millennium Development Goal of reducing child mortality, the City Government of San Carlos is doing its best to give better service to child clients. Health practices like breastfeeding, Vitamin A Supplementation, and newborn screening helped decrease infant mortality. Likewise, vaccination is also one of the essential public health interventions that save the lives of infants. Coverage of various immunizations in CY 2013 is the following:

1. In 2013 2,872 = 79% Fully immunized Children (1 dose of BCG, 3 doses of Polio, 3 doses DPT,3 doses heap, 1 dose of measles before reaching age 1)

2. In 2013 2,168 = 53% Percentage of newborn initiated to breastfeeding within one hour after birth

3. In 2013 1,460 = 36% Exclusive breastfeeding up to 6 months (reported when infant is 6 months old)

4. In 2013 452 = 97% Implemented Newborn Screening 5. In 2013 451 = 97% Children under five years of age were treated

from pneumonia 6. In 2013 186 Children under five years of age were given ORS (oresol)

due to diarrhea Environmental and Sanitation Sustainability: To ensure environmental sustainability in the health program of CHO, water and sanitation were addressed since it may cause various threats if neglected such as diarrhea, cholera, typhoid fever and even hepatitis. The low rate in the utilization of toilet facilities with septic tank can also be a contributing factor in the problems affecting the environment. Below is the data accomplishment of CHO in the environmental and sanitation sustainability.

1. 26,527 No. of HH with access to safe water a) In 2013 3,715 Level I b) In 2013 11,797 Level II c) In 2013 11,022 Level III

39

2. In 2013 23,578 No. of HH have sanitary toilets 3. In 2013 14,098 No. of HH practice satisfactory garbage disposal 4. In 2013 22,508 No. of HH have complete basic sanitary facilities 5. In 2013 1,338 No. of food establishment inspected 6. In 2013 1,338 No. of food establishment have sanitary permits 7. In 2013 1,986 No. of food handlers have health certificate 8. In 2013 2,273 No. of non-food establishments have sanitary permits 9. In 2013 4,864 No. of non- food establishment have health certificate 10. In 2013 834 No. of motor cab operator/driver have sanitary permits 11. In 2013 578 No. of motor cab driver have health certificate 12. In 2013 509 No. of pedicab operator/driver have sanitary permits 13. In 2013 744 No. of pedicab driver have health certificate 14. In 2013 135 No. of fishing operator have sanitary permits 15. In 2013 310 No. of fishing helpers have health certificate 16. In 2013 105 Sanitary orders were issued 17. In 2013 105 Sanitary Orders were complied

National Level (DOH and University of the Philippines)- National Institute of Health Achievers Award - For its consistent exemplary (November 15,2013 at Iloilo performance in Newborn Screening City for Newborn Screening Program) On March 14, 2013, the newly-improved Barangay Health Center of Brgy. Bagonbon was inaugurated funded by the city at P600,000, Dept. of Health at around P800,000. The newly constructed Barangay Health Center of Brgy. I funded by the city at P1,300,697 and Brgy. I at P300,000 was inaugurated last May 8, 2013 Pneumococcal vaccine immunization for city government employees sixty years old and above and senior citizens were conducted by City Health Office on Sept. 30 and Aug. 28, 2013. City Health Office conducted orientation and updates on Newborn Screening for health personnel of the City Health office, San Carlos City Hospital and San Carlos Doctors’ Hospital last Dec. 5-6, 2013 at the

40

Community Center for the latest updates on NBS, especially on a newly discovered disorder, the Maple Syrup Urine Disorder (MSUD). Buildings: 1. Construction of Health Center at Brgy. Bagonbon (completed March 31, 2013), and at Brgy. I (completed May 16, 2013). In support to the DSWD programs for day care is the provision of the Supplementary Feeding Program that aims to address the malnutrition cases for children in day care centers. Food supplementation for 3,052 preschoolers for 2012 budgeted at P3,662,400 was done five days a week for the period of 120 days was finished last November 2013. MDG-FACES Project The successful implementation of MDG-FACES in 2012 in the pilot area of Brgy. 6, led to have said project institutionalized in the annual budget. In April 3, 2013, it was replicated in So. Lawis, Brgy Buluangan with 20 boys and 20 girls as beneficiaries. Milk Feeding of FACES Children started on same date with aged 3-13 as priority. Nutrition Program. The Nutrition Program includes Supplemental feeding through milk feeding and Nutrition Education through mother class. A total of 154 malnourished children identified in Brgy 6 and Brgy Punao were given fresh milk daily and as well as the 76 schoolchildren identified as severely wasted in Maglunod Elementary School. Feeding started last Jan. 22, 2013 at Maglunod Elementary School, Brgy Quezon. The center-Based services like Women and Children Crisis Center respond to the sectoral needs of victims of violence like women and children or undeserving circumstances. CSWD has served 108 disadvantaged children in the city mostly sexually abuse and other acts of abuse, abandoned, neglected and street children and 82 women especially in difficult circumstances mostly battered and victims under R.A. 9262. Another center-based service is the Guidance Center for Minors for children in conflict with the law. It provides: (a) social, (b) home-life, (c) educational, (d) psychological, (e) economic productivity/ skills training and socio-cultural, (f) recreational, (g) dental/medical and, (h) spiritual services. Together with partner agencies and other stakeholders, a package of services including Read along project by the Friends of the Library,

41

supplemental feeding, values formation activities, parenting sessions for street families and psychological care are provided to said beneficiaries. The office reached out to 40 street children through the mobile education assistance program and lakbay aral activities and 10 street families were given street education and livelihood skills trainings. Street children – 40 – Mobile Education, values formation, supplemental feeding, socialization, psychological development, skills training Children in conflict with the law – 87 – Alternative Learning School, Skills Training, Values formation, counseling Street families or mendicants – 10 – Street Education, livelihood, parenting sessions, values formation Youth Sector. In 2013, mobilization of the Pag-Asa Youth Association of the Philippines (PYAP) members in the Cash for Training Project of the DSWD was successfully done. There were 40 of them enrolled in 2 vocational courses,; Housekeeping NC II and Driving and Automotive. The new cash for training program (C4TP) of the Technical Education and Skills Development Authority (TESDA) is a project to help indigent youths to fight off poverty. The C4TP is a joint project of the TESDA and the Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) that was implemented last April to May 2013. The program aimed at helping beneficiaries land a job or start their own businesses. DSWD provide the funds for the training and assisted the TESDA in identifying the beneficiaries. Persons with Disability Sector: A total of 620 members were enlisted for Persons with Disability and were given local ID’s. The Public Employment Service Office (PESO) thru the DOLE also provided jobs for said PWDs in short term basis. Events and organizations of PWDs were also recognized by the Local Government Unit. Senior Citizens Sector. Consistent with the mandate of R.A No. 9994 or the “Expanded Senior Citizen’s Act of 2010”, CSWDO assisted the OSCA in its services particularly in the processing of the Local ID. In 2013, 1,800 Local Identification cards have been issued, a total of 8,903 Senior Citizen’s were officially enrolled in 2013, and, a total of 320 indigent senior citizens have availed of the Social Pension for Indigent Filipino Senior Citizens under the Expanded Senior Citizens Act of 2010 or R.A 9994. BUB Projects implemented in 2013: Provision of SEED capital through SEA-K scheme for Beneficiaries of Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program and National Household Targeting System for Poverty Reduction or NHTS-PR; Construction of one (1) unit Day Care Center, Lupao; construction of one (1) unit Day Care Center, Agmaula; Construction of one (1) unit Day

42

Care Center, Bairan; Construction of San Carlos City Children’s Museum with Amenities; construction of Malnutrition Ward & rehabilitation Center; Repair and Upgrading of Marago-os, Day Care Center, Brgy. Nataban; Repair and Upgrading of Maglunod Day Care Center, Brgy. Quezon; Supplemental Feeding for Malnourished Children, Pregnant and lactating Mothers; Purchase of materials for San Carlos Mobile Library or SaCaMoLi ; Purchase of Playground devices and learning equipments/Manipulative toys for day care centers.

New-born Hearing Test Services at City Hospital.

City Health Office Medical Mission at Bgy. Quezon last January 31, 2013

SCCADAC Drug Symposium at Julio Ledesma National High School

last February 27, 2013

43

Medical Mission with AmCham Foundation Inc. at Brgy 3

last March 14, 2013.

Newly-built and turn-over Barangay Health Center at Bgy. 1

last May 8, 2013

Talentadong Buntis last November 29, 2013 at Consuelo Alger Center

Smoke-Free Ordinance and Sanitation Code Public Hearing at SP Session

Hall last November 26, 2013

44

Economic Governance

Figure 3

Out of three (3) sub-areas, the city has an excellent performance in Entrepreneurship, Business and Industry Promotion but it has high performance in Support to Fishery Services with 4.18.

Priority areas for improvement and needs to be done:

• Support to Agriculture Sector • Support to Fishery Services

3.64

4.18

5.00

0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00

SUPPORT TO AGRICULTURE SECTOR

SUPPORT TO FISHERY SERVICES

ENTREPRENEURSHIP, BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY PROMOTION

San Carlos City, PY 2013

Very Low 1 Low 2 Fair/Medi

um 3

High 4 Excellent 5

Color

Adjectival Equivalent

Scale

45

On Support to Agriculture Sector The city should look into rehabilitation or construction of irrigation system for irrigated or irrigable areas in identified farming areas. More efforts to be done in providing post-harvest equipments, machines or facilities to farmers through cooperatives or association to improve the production of farming products. Provide financial allocation in procuring this post-harvest facilities. The city should look on extending credit facilitation services (non-collaterized loans to poor farmers, ie loan access, insurance and credit guarantees) through cooperatives or other financing institutions. Mobilize and extend the services of the Cooperatives and Livelihood Development Office to farmers cooperatives or associations. Provision of production support services to farmers like planting materials, fertilizers and other soil ameliorants, or provide laboratory services such as soil testing services. The city shall assists or provide assistance on on-site research services to farmers and provide market development services to trade fairs, exhibits, missions or congress. In 2013, a total of 2, 952 farming households had availed of agricultural extension and on-site research services or facilities in the city. In support to San Carlos City farmers, the City Agriculture Office extended the following extension works: a. Technical and Market Support for Integrated Farming, a program designed to deliver basic and technical services to rice farmers in five (5) granary barangays: Brgy. Bagonbon, Brgy. Codcod, Brgy. Nataban, Brgy. Prosperidad, and Brgy. Quezon through Famer Field School-Palay Check System (FFS-PCS), Technology Demonstration (Techno Demo), Soil Sampling and Analysis, Variety Demonstration Trial in coordination with PhilRice, and Certified Seeds Production Program subsidized by the City Government. Total rice production in 2013 was 4,575.91 MT from a total area monitored of 1,098.7 hectares. Problems encountered are: Lack of Postharvest facilities like: Flatbed Dryers/Warehouse, Multi- purpose Drying Pavement, Insufficient Irrigation Facilities, more Farm to Market Road, b. For year 2013, a total of P702,000 was appropriated for Mango Development Program. A total of 2,518 grafted mango seedlings were

46

dispersed to 88 local farmers who were also provided with technical assistance. c. The Vegetable Production Program with an appropriation of P286, 206 and a supplemental of P50,000 in 2013 dispersed various vegetable seeds to 210 farmers/clients who were also taught vermin composting as organic fertilization, biological control agents and concoction of indigenous materials as pesticide control. Bio- agents released in the field: Trichograma – 3,470 strips; Diadegma- 3,020 adults; Earwigs- 1,605 adults Award received: “2012 Top 5 Outstanding Agricultural Extension Worker in the Province of Negros Occidental’ d. Animal Disease Control Section conducted massive Deworming and Vaccinations, Consultations, Lectures and Surveillance of important animal diseases in all Barangays of the City. The Barangay Clinic Program served 6,392 livestock farmers for the year 2013. For the Quarantine and disease surveillance, the office monitored and inspected 175,203 incoming animals and 41,631 animals shipped to Cebu. A total 75 cases of Hemorrhagic Septicemia and Ephemeral fever in large cattle was monitored after Typhoon Yolanda for the months of November to December, but all of the said animals were treated with zero mortality. The section also vaccinated 327 Carabaos, 714 Cattles; 738 Goats, 750 Pigs, 4,008 Chickens, and dewormed 1,646 Carabaos, 2,953 Cattles, 9,242 Goats, 566 Pigs, and 1,593 Chickens. e. Artificial Insemination (AI) Program was able to serve 224 Carabaos, and 159 Cattles. f. Animal Dispersal Program is a project of the city for augmenting farmers’ income thru the provision of draft animals for farm operations, cattle for breeding purposes and dairy cattle in support to the dairy project of the city. The city has put up a breeding center wherein ruminant animals like carabao, goat and sheep are raised to become sources of breeding animals for dispersal purposes. In 2013 animal dispersed under the program were 7 heads carabaos and 14 heads cattles. Last 2013, dispersal and upgrading of native goats resulted to 500 heads dispersed to 224 clients, 84 female goats re-dispersed to 42 clients,

47

and awarded 18 does to 9 clients after repayment of 4 kids as stipulated in the contract. Award Received: “ Best Goat Breeding Project (Provincial Level) 2012 g. Organic Farming was promoted through the use of vermi cast for fertilizer produced at the Agri Center which totaled 1.64 tons in 2013. h. Agriculture-related infrastructure projects completed in 2013 include construction of 21 Garden Plots at demo Farm – Brgy. Codcod; construction of Agri-warehouse at So. Medina, Brgy. Rizal; repair of damaged Lateral Irrigation canal of Barbia 2 in Brgy. Bagonbon; completed concreting work of the following rural roads: So. Iliranan (Phase III); Brgy. Codcod (Feb. 26, 2013); Along So. Maligid, Brgy. Nataban – So. Agbulod, Brgy. Prosperidad (March 27, 2013); Along So. Lupao – Balisog Box Culvert, Brgy Quezon (March 27, 2013); Along So. Maravilla – Balisong with Box Culvert, Brgy. Codcod (March 27, 2013); So. Walos – Bagonbon Proper Road, Brgy. Bagonbon (May 31, 2013); Road with Single Barrel Box Culvert at So. Iliranan, Brgy. Codcod Phase IV (Sept. 30, 2013); So. Agbulod, Brgy. Prosperidad, Crossing Highway to Interior (Sept. 30, 2013); and Road Along Lagha to Balisong with Box Culvert, Brgy. Quezon (Nov. 30, 2013).

The city government

entered into a Memorandum of Agreement with the Philippine Fiber Industry

Development Authority

(PhilFIDA) and landowner/coop

erator Anthony S. Wee for the establishment of a High Density (HD)

Abaca Nursery in the city. PhilFIDA’s program now runs equal to the city government’s desire to establish a 1-hectare High Density abaca nursery and provide sustainable

48

livelihood for local farmers at the same time contributing to climate change mitigation. Cooperator Wee has allocated one hectare for HD abaca nursery at Brgy. Nataban to serve local farmers in the area and as actual plantation of abaca for 10 years. PhilFIDA pledged to provide technical assistance to said project including planting materials, supervision and monitoring in the maintenance of said nursery while the city government will provide the personnel/technicians from the City Agriculture Office and City Livelihood & Development Office (CLDO) to oversee maintenance and facilitate distribution of planting materials to farmer beneficiaries. Per inventory as of Dec. 20, 2013 a total of 4,912 abaca were already planted at four different demonstration sites at Barangays Bagonbon, Nataban, Prosperidad and Codcod. The city has provided a sum of P700,000 for abaca production and propagation. Meanwhile, CLDO has conducted seminars on abaca production and processing to local farmers and livelihood organizations in various upland barangays regarding planting, harvesting, stripping and knotting of abaca fiber More support in terms of postharvest equipments, machines or facilities. Improve infrastructure like communal irrigation system, farm-to-market roads, postharvest facilities and improvement of facilitation services to farmers. Concreting and opening of farm-to-market roads are priority programs of the city government to further boost economic growth in the countryside. Bringing their farm products to market has become easy for farmers of So. Maliguid, Brgy. Nataban and So. Iliranan, Brgy. Codcod with the completion of the concreting project of 1.695 km and 1km farm-to-market road, respectively inaugurated in October and September 2013. The project at So. Maliguid, Brgy. Nataban was funded by the Seal of Good Housekeeping award, Performance Challenge Fund of DILG and the city government. The one-kilometer road concreting project at So. Iliranan, Brgy. Codcod funded by the Dept. of Agriculture and the city government.

49

Iliranan road (left), Nataban road (right)

The city held its 1st Farmers Recognition Day last Dec. 10, 2013 to recognize local farmers as government’s partner in improving rice production for their support/involvement to increase rice production. Top performers, particularly those adopting the Palay Check System and Integrated Nutrient Management Practices taught by the City Agriculture Office thru Farmers Field School, were awarded cash gifts and certificates of appreciation.

Farm tractor and farm machineries at Agricultural Center

Large-farm animals Livestock Dispersal at Agricultural Center

50

2012 Best Implementer for the Veterinary Quarantine Services and Best Implementer in Goat Breeding during the Negros First Livestock Award

2012 given at La Planta Hotel, Bacod City last December 6, 2012.

Ricetekno Klinik and Farmer’s Dialogue at Bgy. Codcod

last February 5, 2013

Techno-Demo Rice MOA Signing last February 26, 2013

at Consuelo Alger Community Center.

Farmer Field School - Field Day at So. Merkulesan, Bgy. Quezon

last May 8, 2013.

51

Bantay Peste Brigade Training for Farmer Leaders

at Bgy. Rizal, San Carlos City last September 10-11, 2013.

On Support to Fishery Services Support on rehabilitation or construction of fishery related infrastructure like mariculture parks, fish ports, seaweeds village ecozones, sea cages, among others to increase fish production. Improve or extend credit facilitation services to fisherfolks by providing non-collaterized loan services through cooperatives or associations. Provision of fingerlings to fisherfolks through fishery programs or projects of the city. In 2013, a total of 800 fishery households had availed of fishery extension and on-site research services or facilities in the city. Aside from this, the city has implemented mud crab culture project.

On Entrepreneurship, Business and Industry Promotions The city’s Public Employment Service Office (PESO) and the city government are now nominated by the Department of Labor & Employment (DOLE) for the 2012 National Best PESO Award for component city category after receiving the award as Top Performer in the region last September 25, 2013 during the 13th National PESO Congress at Palo, Leyte. DOLE cited the wholehearted and unwavering support of the city government and PESO in the promotion and delivery of its employment program. PESO Manager Delia Camasura received the award from DOLE Secretary Rosalinda Dimapilis-Baldoz including the citation for City Mayor, Gerardo P. Valmayor, Jr. which Camasura handed to the City Mayor last September 30, 2013 at his office.

52

PESO’s 2012 accomplishment report to DOLE registered a total of 20,491 job applicants placed for both local and overseas employment out of the 21,419 referred persons through job fairs in 2012. SCAPODA receives new pedicabs from Kasangga San Carlos Pedicab Operators and Drivers Association, Inc. (SCAPODA) headed by Zosimo Quiño gratefully accepted the 10 new pedicabs from Ang Kasangga Partylist through the city government in coordination with Cooperatives and Livelihood Development Office (CLDO) last June 3, 2013 at the City Hall lobby. Ang Kasangga Secretary General, former City Mayor Bong Lacson, now Vice Governor elect of the province, exerted efforts to materialize said donations to SCAPODA. Kasangga has given SCAPODA a total of more than P300,000.00 worth of pedicabs including spare parts, cost of repairs and repainting of old units since last year. City provides employment/livelihood opportunities to disadvantaged youth TESDA provided Cash for Work Training to 40 disadvantaged youth of the city and TESDA scholars which culminated last July 16, 2013. The 20 scholars for Automotive & Driving and 20 scholars for Housekeeping Service underwent training for 55 days starting April 8. Final assessment for Housekeeping was done at La Consolacion College, Bacolod City while that of Automotive & Driving was done by TESDA. Only 39 passed and received the National Certificate or NC II.

Each scholars received P20,000 under the DSWD’s Cash for Work Training program. In addition, automotive & driving scholars also received tool kits worth P6,000. Skills training was provided by Universal School for Applied Technology, Regional Training Center in Talisay City, Negros Occidental. Livelihood groups learn abaca twining, braiding from a member of the San Carlos City Craft Arts & Food Association last July 16-19,

2013 at the Pavilion, People’s Park, San Carlos City in coordination with Fiber Industry Development Authority (FIDA) and the Department of Trade

53

& Industry (DTI) to make varied commercial products out of twined and braided abaca.

Distribution of tool kits to automotive scholars.

Implemented the Streamlined Business Permit Licensing System (BPLS) and in fully compliance with the Joint Memo Circular from Department of Trade and Industry and the Department of the Interior and Local Government. The city’s Business Permit & Licensing Office (BPLO) received a Plaque of Recognition from the Dept. of Trade & Industry (DTI) and the Dept. of the Interior and Local Government (DILG) for “having satisfactorily complied with the requirements in Business Permit Licensing System Streamlining stipulated in DTI-DILG JMC No. 01 and JDAO No. 10-07 series of 2010.” The plaque was received by the city mayor from DTI Senior Trade Specialist & BPLS Streamlining Provincial Coach and Account Officer Gerin Vergara last February 13, 2013. The city also conducted seminar on Appreciation Course for Enterprise Development and Productivity with 39 different business entities attended in cooperation with DOLE and the city. San Carlos Biopower, Inc. (SCBP) and San Carlos Solar Energy, Inc. (SACASOL), two renewable energy (RE) sources, launched simultaneously their respective multi-billion project in the city with the P3.5B

54

biopower plant and groundbreaking of the solar power at the SACASOL project site at Brgy. Punao last Oct. 9, 2013. The dual occasion was graced by Department of Energy (DOE) Assistant Secretary Daniel A. Ariaso, Sr., foreign representatives of investor ThomasLloyd Group from Europe headed by its chairman Michael Sieg, local government officials headed by City Mayor Gerardo Valmayor, Jr. and Vice Mayor Edgardo Quisumbing, provincial officials lead by Vice Governor Eugenio Jose Lacson, representatives business sector, VRESCO, city government department heads and other invited guests. SACASOL is a 35-hectare solar farm which purely uses sunlight as a main source of energy thru solar panels. “Construction of Biopower plant has already started to meet its operation requirement set to commence by early 2015”, said Luisito Traboco, Country Manager of WUXI HEPECL, Phils., the contractor of San Carlos Biopower, Inc. project in an interview with Tribute and was confirmed by Jose Maria P. Zabaleta, Jr., President of Bronzeoak Phils., the local partner of ThomasLloyd Group. SCBP’s fuel supply department had already surveyed the entire cane areas in Negros Island including private lands for “energy tree plantation” while a cane trash supply agreement will set about with all sugarcane planters in said areas since the main ingredient for producing heat for the biopower plant is sugarcane trash. Said technology eliminates open burning which is hazardous to the environment while ashes formed from said biomass will be disposed into a landfill or used as fertilizers. Wig factory now operates in the city A wig factory, ArtNature Manufacturing Philippines, Inc., is now operating at Vasconia, Brgy. Palampas. The Japanese-owned company, a subsidiary of ArtNature Inc. of Tokyo, Japan, started operations last June 2013 and is run by staff from its main plant in Sto. Tomas, Batangas.

55

Production Div. Senior Manager Albert Aguinaldo said that they chose San Carlos City as their Batangas plant extension because they find the city very conducive to such work and mostly because of the city’s peace and order situation. He added that since the company is Japanese owned, a Japanese technology in production is employed for the fashionable Japanese market while raw materials come from India and

China. Aguinaldo also said that they don’t use chemicals in production and waste materials are purely solid where disposal is easy. The company now trains workers in hand webbing and ventilation under the supervision of four trainers from Batangas to produce 300 skilled workers that can finish 500 pieces of wigs at a given time. Said wigs will then be shipped to Batangas for final touches before delivery to its headquarters in Japan.

56

Environmental Governance

Figure 4

The city has an excellent areas in Coastal Marine Ecosystems Management and Freshwater Ecosystems Management and Forest Ecosystems Management. Areas need to be done in Urban Ecosystems Management.

Needs to be done: Urban Ecosystems Management Efforts to be made in scheduling of solid waste collection and disposal. Procure additional garbage truck or compactor to augment the present vehicles in solid waste collection. Garbage trucks and compactor are already old and needs to be repaired or refurbished, occassional breakdowns can affect the scheduled collection of solid waste.

5.00

5.00

5.00

4.75

4.60 4.65 4.70 4.75 4.80 4.85 4.90 4.95 5.00

FOREST ECOSYSTEMS MANAGEMENT

FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS MANAGEMENT

COASTAL MARINE ECOSYSTEMS MANAGEMENT

URBAN ECOSYSTEMS MANAGEMENT

San Carlos City, PY 2013

Very Low 1 Low 2 Fair/Medi

um 3

High 4 Excellent 5

Color Code

Adjectival Equivalent

Scale

57

On Urban Ecosystems Management City sets up Environment Management Office As an environmentally compliant city responsive to the tough challenges of global issues on environmental awareness and protection, the city government created the City Environment Management Office (CEMO), a department solely for environmental concern, enacted through City Ordinance No. 13-07 last June 20, 2013, amending Ordinance No. 13-01, entitled, An Ordinance Creating the City Environment Management Office (CEMO) and Providing for its Tasks, Functions, Personnel, and Appropriation Thereof and for Other Purposes By Providing for the Changing of Names of Position Titles”. Divisions under CEMO are Integrated Waste Management/Pollution Control; Watershed, Parks, Protected Areas, Wildlife & Forestry; Coastal Resource Management; Regulatory Division; Climate Change Division; and Administrative Support Services. The CEMO handles all sustainable measures including present and future programs and projects related to the effective and efficient preservation, protection, promotion and enhancement of the ecological balance and the environment of San Carlos City. Thru this, the city government believed that the environment will be taken care of, from the grasses of the mountains down to the seas or “from the weeds to the reefs”. The city mayor puts it as “one way of putting everyone’s acts together to make the city a better place to live.”

Fores Ecosystems Management A total of one hundred one point twenty (101.20) additional agroforestry area were planted with assorted grafted fruit seedlings at a distance of 8m x 8m with 156 plant density per hectare last Sept. 3, 2013. Another nine thousand five hundred forty seven (9547) assorted fruit seedlings were planted in additional (61.20 has) sixty one point twenty hectares for agroforestry sub project components while six thousand two hundred forty (6240) assorted grafted seedlings were also planted in (40 has) forty hectares DENR LEAD PROJECT last Aug. 5, 2013. Rainforestation. Endemic forestry seedlings were planted for the additional 20 hectares at a distance of 3m x 3m with one thousand one hundred eleven (1,111) plants density per hectare last September 30, 2013 totaling to twenty two thousand two hundred twenty (22,220) assorted endemic forest tree seedlings planted.

58

A total of 25,960 assorted endemic and fruit tree seedlings were planted in different location in the Barangays. There are ten (10) Bantay Bukid Brigade (BBB) assigned to do foot patrol and Law enforcing in Barangay Quezon. Roadside Planting of various forest tree seedlings at different Sitio’s of Barangay Nataban: Total of 4,375 pcs. Mahogany and Neem tree (still existing and maintained). Barangay Palampas: Total of 678 pcs. Mahogany and Neem tree (still existing and maintained) Barangay Punao: Total of 806 pcs. Mahogany and Acacia still existing and maintained. Barangay Bagonbon: Total of 925 pcs Mahogany and Neem tree still existing and maintained. Brgy. Guadalupe: Total of 2,966 pcs Mahogany. Brgy. Rizal River Bank Plantation 5,000 pcs assorted endemic forest trees (still existing and maintained). Other Activities Annual Tree Planting July 4, 2013 4,400 pcs. Mahogany seedlings with 2 has planted at Sitio Medina Brgy. Rizal (Both local, national offices and other agencies) Catholic Women’s League (CWL) 100 pcs mahogany seedlings City Waterworks Department 200 pcs mahogany seedlings Planted assorted forest trees seedlings at Public Land (Dispersed) a.Barangay Rizal 750 pcs b.Barangay Guadalupe 3,300 pcs c Barangay Prosperidad 1,000 pcs d Barangay Nataban 500 pcs The No Plastic Day program prohibiting the use of plastic bags and wrappers among vendors at the public market took effect on August 11, 2013, Sunday, and went on every Sundays thereafter until December 2013. E n v i r o n me n t Specialist Arthur Batomalaque said that as of 2012, non-recyclable plastic wastes at the city’s landfill area has already reached more than 36 thousand kilos or an average of 100 kilos per day. He said that since the wet market is one area which uses plastics in bulk daily it became their main target as other areas like vegetable and dry goods sections are easier to control. He added that this scheme provides

59

adequate time for the Committee on Environmental Protection & Natural Resources under SP Rommel Debulgado to study the effect of said program especially in the drafting of ordinances for its full implementation later on. Imposing the “No Plastic Day” policy at the wet market of the city is one massive job for the City Environment Management Office (CEMO) and to win the cooperation of vendors at the public market CEMO, thru its Integrated Waste Management Division, launched the “Search for Most Environment Friendly Vendor” last August 5, 2013 at the public market atrium.

Freshwater Ecosystems Management A new septage expert from Netherlands has reviewed the city’s centralize septage project. Senior Expert Septage Consultant Jan Dop made a presentation to the Technical Working Group (TWG) last December 2013 on his review and re-evaluattion of the project including the wastewater treatment at the Eco-center Brgy. Guadalupe and slaughterhouse. Also taken up were the treatments for discharges of untreated domestic wastewater disposed into the sea. CEMO Environmental Mng’t. Specialist Arthur Batomalaque said that from the previous estimated budget of P6.5M including the purchase of a septic truck, the cost reduced to P3.9M after re-evaluation by eliminating 2 chambers in the conceptual design. He added that after the approval of said project, the actual detail of the modular design will immediately follow.

60

Coastal Marine Ecosystems Management Coastal marine ecosystem management is a core concern of the LGU. Long-term planning is practiced. CSOs and citizens are engaged in coastal marine protection and rehabilitation. Areas for rehabilitation and protection are set, and that target areas for rehabilitation and protection are met. The marine sanctuary and marine protected area were already established in Sipaway Island with annual participation to the International Coastal Clean-up Day by conducting underwater clean-up. Memorandum of understanding between San Carlos City government and CAFC/FARMC was made in the protection and preservation of coastal marine resources. Mangrove Reforestation Program brought about the planting of propagules at 8 designated mangrove areas among various barangays and with 7 mangrove nurseries maintained thereat.

61

62

Search for Outstanding Environment Friendly Vendor at Public Market last

September 6, 2013

3rd Localized Environment Week last June 17, 2014 at City Auditorium

Newly-purchased garbage compactor blessing last May 05, 2013

at the City Hall.

Memorandum on Agreement on the Forest Land Use Plan (FLUP) Signing

at Consuelo Alger Community Center last February 28, 2013

63

Valuing Fundamentals of Governance

Figure 5

Out of three (3) sub-areas, the city has an excellent performance in Financial Accountability and Transparency. Participation has a high rating performance.

Priority areas for improvement and needs to be done:

• Participation

4.00

5.00

5.00

0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00

PARTICIPATION

TRANSPARENCY

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY

San Carlos City, PY 2013

Very Low 1 Low 2 Fair/Medi

um 3

High 4 Excellent 5

Color Code

Adjectival Equivalent

Scale

64

On Participation

The city has an excellent performance on the following areas: To strengthen participation of Civil Society Organizations (CSO) in the city’s special bodies and increase their role in the development process, Dept. of Interior & Local Government (DILG) in the city in coordination

with Cooperatives & Livelihood Development Office (CLDO), City Planning and Development Office (CPDO) and Sangguniang Panlungsod (SP) conducted a briefing and facilitated the selection of representatives from among the registered CSOs to the local special bodies last Sept. 13, 2013 at the Community Center. Selected CSOs for the City Development Council are San Carlos

Diocesan MPC, Tindahan sa Katilingban MPC, San Carlos City Abaca Industry Ass‘n., Nabingkalan Indigenous Seedling Producers’ Ass‘n., Inc., Ass’n.

of Bantay Katunggan, JF Ledesma Foundation, Nabingkalan Tricycle Operators’ & Drivers’ Ass‘n., and San Carlos

Public School Teachers & Employees MPC. CSO representatives to other required councils/mechanism include San Carlos City Organized Rescuers for Community Assistance Inc., San Carlos City Public School Teachers & Employees-MPC, Barangay 1 Women’s Ass’n., and Rescue 711 for City Disaster Risk Reduction Management Council (CDRRMC); San Carlos City Medical Society, Rev. Adolfo P. Lampute, Brgy. Guadalupe Health Workers Women’s Ass’n., and CPSU President for SCC Local Aids Council; ABK3 LEAP, Resident Pastor, UCCP

65

San Carlos City and San Carlos City Public School Teachers & Employees MPC for San Carlos City Anti-Drugs Abuse Council (SCCADAC); Tindahan sa Katilingban MPC, City Agricultural & Fishery Council, Association of Bantay Katunggan, Codcod MPC, Brgy. 1 Women’s Ass‘n. and San Carlos City Public School Teachers & Employees MPC for Local Poverty Reduction Action Team (LPRAT); San Carlos Diocesan Action Foundation, Inc., and Palampas Upland Farmers’ Ass’n. for San Carlos City Peace & Order Council (SCCPOC). CSOs for other LSB were identified earlier. The term of office of CSO representatives is three years.

FINANCIAL ACOUNTABILITY The city has created an Internal Audit Office and created positions to be filled. The city followed the accounting standards and procedures in compliance with New Government Accounting Standards or NGAS. The city also is using electronic NGAS (eNGAS) to its system to streamline the accounting systems of the city with efficient and accuracy. The City Accounting Office staff were sent to seminars and workshops regarding the use of eNGAS. The City Accounting Office issues a written communication to those employees whose cash advances lapse 30 days for its liquidation. Annual Financial Statements were posted in the bulletin boards in 3 conspicuous places.

66

Transparency

67

FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

COST TO COLLECT REVENUES

The City has exceptional performance in local revenue collection efficiency with cost to collect revenue is lower than both averages of LGU with the same LGU type and class and national average of the same LGU type regardless of income class with a score of 5.95% and lower than last year with 6.08%

LOCALLY-SOURCED REVENUES TO TOTAL INCOME

The City has no exceptional performance on locally-sourced revenue to total income based on average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class although higher than the national average of the same LGU type regardless of income class due to the fact that the city has 71.63% in 2012 while in 2013 with 28.36% dependency rate from external sources.

6.08%

13.27% 14.34%

5.95%

0.00% 2.00% 4.00% 6.00% 8.00%

10.00% 12.00% 14.00% 16.00%

SAN CARLOS CITY AVERAGE 2ND CLASS CITY

NAT'L AVE. CITY

COST TO COLLECT REVENUES

2012 2013

28.37 28.36

71.63 71.64

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2012 2013

Dependency Rate from External Revenue Sources

Locally-sourced Revenues to Total Income

68

REGULAR REVENUE TO TOTAL INCOME

The City has excellence performance in the ratio of regular revenue to Total Income. The city scored in 2013 98.27% while in 2012 is 99.29% regular revenue to total income

LOCALLY SOURCED REVENUE LEVEL

With a locally-sourced revenue of PhP 149, 761,615.83 in 2012 while PhP 178, 695, 025.70 in 2013 which is higher than in 2012, the City has excellent performance in 2013 being higher than the average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class and yet lower the national average of the same LGU type regardless of income class.

99.29

89.57

92.36

98.27

84

86

88

90

92

94

96

98

100

102

SAN CARLOS CITY AVERAGE 2ND CLASS CITY

NATIONAL AVE. CITY

REGULAR REVENUE TO TOTAL INCOME

2012

2013

149,761,615.83

170,997,580.47

528,358,124.76

178,695,025.70

-

100,000,000.00

200,000,000.00

300,000,000.00

400,000,000.00

500,000,000.00

600,000,000.00

SAN CARLOS CITY AVERAGE 2ND CLASS CITY

NATIONAL AVE. CITY

LOCALLY-SOURCE REVENUE LEVEL

2012 2013

69

LOCALLY-SOURCED REVENUE PER CAPITA

The City has excellent performance in locally-sourced revenue per capita in 2013 with PhP 1,374.78 in 2013 compare to 2012 with PhP 1,152.18 as the desired performance should be higher than the average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class.

REAL PROPERTY TAX ACCOMPLISHMENT RATE

With only 66.65% in 2012 RPT accomplishment rate, the City has no exceptional performance being lower than the desired average of LGU with the same LGU type and income class same with the national average of the same LGU type regardless of income class. But in 2013 the city increase its real property tax accomplishment rate with 73.27% with an increase of 6.62% yet it is still lower than the same class and national average.

1,152.18

1,325.96 1,413.18 1,374.78

0.00

200.00

400.00

600.00

800.00

1,000.00

1,200.00

1,400.00

1,600.00

SAN CARLOS CITY AVERAGE 2ND CLASS CITY

NATIONAL AVE. CITY

LOCALLY-SOURCED REVENUE PER CAPITA

2012

2013

66.65%

99.97% 94.22%

73.27%

0.00%

20.00%

40.00%

60.00%

80.00%

100.00%

120.00%

SAN CARLOS CITY AVERAGE 2ND CLASS CITY

NATIONAL AVE. CITY

REAL PROPERTY TAX ACCOMPLISHMENT RATE

2012 2013

70

RESOURCE ALLOCATION AND UTILIZATION-PERSONAL SERVICES EXPENDITURE RATIO

The City has excellence performance on personal services expenditure ratio which is lower than the average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class and the national average of LGUs with the same LGU type regardless of income class. The city scored 41.95% in 2012 and 36.23% in 2013 personal services expenditure ratio which does not exceed 45-55% PS ceiling.

TOTAL EXPENDITURE PER CAPITA

The City has excellence expenditure per capita of PhP 4,541.34 in 2012 while in 2013 the city has 4,011.71 in expenditure per capita which is lower than in 2012, based on average LGU with the same LGU type and income class same with the national average of the same LGU type regardless of income class the city has an excellent performance in both same class and national average.

41.95%

38.68% 39%

36.23%

32.00%

34.00%

36.00%

38.00%

40.00%

42.00%

44.00%

SAN CARLOS CITY AVERAGE 2ND CLASS CITY

NATIONAL AVE. CITY

PERSONAL SERVICES EXPENDITURE RATIO

2012 2013

4,541.34

3,658.54 3,560.33 4,011.71

0.00

1,000.00

2,000.00

3,000.00

4,000.00

5,000.00

SAN CARLOS CITY AVERAGE 2ND CLASS CITY

NATIONAL AVE. CITY

TOTAL EXPENDITURE PER CAPITA

2012 2013

71

STATE OF PERFORMANCE (INPUT)

72

73

STATE OF PERFORMANCE (OUTPUT)

74

75

ORDINANCES Ord. No. 13-01: An Ordinance Creating the City Environment Management Office (CEMO) and providing for its Tasks, Functions, Personnel and Appropriation thereof and For Other Purposes; Ord. No. 13-03: An Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 10-21 by mandating the Care of Pregnant and Expectant Mothers to be under the City Health Office Personnel; Ord. No. 13-06: An Ordinance Providing for Rules and Standards, in the exercise of the Proprietary Right of the City Government Over the Operation and Maintenance of the Government Canteen, pursuant to Book I, Title One, Chapter 2, Section 18 of the Local Government Code and for other Purposes; Ord. No. 13-16: An Ordinance Providing for New Rates and Fees of the Officiating Officials of Sports Activities herein listed, thereby amending Section 3 of Ordinance No. 22, Series of 2004 and Section 1 of Ordinance No. 07, Series of 2009; Ord. No. 13-24: “An Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 10-17, Series of 2010 entitled The People’s Park Ordinance of 2010, Repealing Ordinance No. 16, Series of 2004 and For Other Purposes. Ord. No. 13-33: An Ordinance Creating The Land Management Council And Land Management Office Formalizing The Local Government Unit Initiated Systematic Land Titling Program; Ord. No. 13-36: An Ordinance Amending Section 8 (A.3) And Section 17 Of Ordinance No. 07-05, Otherwise Known As The 2006 Traffic Ordinance Of The City Of San Carlos, Negros Occidental; Ord. No. 13-34: New Rates for Hospital Fees and Services; Ord. No. 13-35: San Carlos City Sanitation Code

76

RESOLUTIONS

1. Res. 13-03- MOA on NFA rice of credit 2. Res. 13-05- MOA with DA on FMR for Brgys. Bagonbon & Codcod 3. Res. 13-06- Purchase of Garbage Truck w/ compactor for CEMO 4. Res. 13-07- MOA w/ TSKMPC for loan assistance of P1M 5. Res. 13-08- Program of Works of four (4) projects 6. Res. 13-13- Transfer of funds to Brgy. Quezon 7. Res. 13-14- Program of Works of eight (8) projects 8. Res. 13-18- MOA on FLUP for the DENR-USAID-US 9. Res. 13-20- Purchase of parts & repair of D5 Bulldozer of CEMO 10. Res. 13-21- REGALA activities 11. Res. 13-22- Counterpart Fund to the PAMANA Program 12. Res. 13-23- MOA w/ DA on improvement of barangay road 13. Res. 13-24- POW Lot 7 Circumferential Road Project 14. Res. 13-27-Various materials for the Philhealth Express Office 15. Res. 13-29- MOA w/ DA, Region 6, for one (1) corn mill 16. Res. 13-31- Purchase of printer for the COMELEC 17. Res. 13-32- Electrical Service Connection for SEP beneficiaries 18. Res. 13-33- POW Const. of Bulkhead w/ dredging (Phase II) 19. Res. 13-35- Transfer of funds to Brgy. I 20. Res. 13-46- Contract of Affiliation with CSR for trainings of midwifery,

nursing aides & caregivers students at the City Hospital 21. Res. 13-51- Purchase of 8 sets 2-way wall mounted speaker & IT

equipment for SP Office 22. Res. 13-52 - Program of Works for five (5) projects 23. Res. 13-53-Access road development P440,000 per CDC Res. No. 13-

01 24. Res. 13-55- PDAF from Sen. Loren Legarda for scholarship program 25. Res. 13-57- Membership Agreement with RAMESES Systems, Inc. 26. Res. 13-58-Program of Works for two (2) projects in Sipaway 27. Res. 13-59-Purchase of Outdoor lighted signage, etc. for PhilHealth 28. Res. 13-66-POW for rehabilitation of jetmatic hand pump 29. Res. 13-68-Purchase of service vehicle for the SP Office 30. Res. 13-76-POW for the electrification of Iliranan Elem. School 31. Res. 13-77- POW for three (3) projects 32. Res. 13-79- POW for repair of the City Hospital for P708,000.00 33. Res. 13-80-MOA w/ VRESCO for electrical poles at Brgy. Rizal 34. Res. 13-83-POW of electrical poles at So. Tagda, Brgy. Nataban 35. Res. 13-85-MOA with ANP for Ourfood-Negros Program 36. Res. 13-86-MOA with BPI-LGNCRDC on farm trials 37. Res. 13-88-Program of Works for three (3) projects

77

38. Res. 13-89-POW- Construction/Installation of electrical poles at So. Maragoos Brgy. Nataban

39. Res. 13-93 – MOA-opening of Trust Fund Accounts for BUB and Pamana Programs of DA

40. Res. 13-100-MOA with PSPI in the conduct of bilateral tubal ligation 41. Res. 13-103-MOA with DSWD for allocation in the BUB of DSWD 42. Res. 13-104- MOA with DA for Integrated Organic Agriculture 43. Res. 13-109-Purchase of Personal Computer w/ Printer for CARCC 44. Res. 13-111-Purchase of personal computers & printers for the MQC

division 45. Res. 13-112-Purchase of personal computers & printers for Task Force

Osprey and for the San Carlos PNP 46. Res. 13-113-MOA with BFAR for Seaweed Culture Project 47. Res. 13-114- Purchase of Lot (Augusto Villa) 48. Res. 13-117- Program Of Work for four (4) projects 49. Res. 13-118-Purchase of various office equipment/supplies for

different offices 50. Res. 13-119-Funding for establishment of Loafing Area in So. Medina,

Brgy. Rizal 51. Res. 13-120-Purchase of office equipment for use of the CLUP, FLUP

and CDP 52. Res. 13-122-MOA with VRESCO for the Construction/Installation of

electrical poles at So. Tagda, Brgy. Nataban 53. Res. 13-123-MOA with VRESCO for the Construction/Installation of

electrical poles at So. Marago-os, Brgy. Nataban 54. Res. 13-124-MOA with VRESCO for the Construction/Installation of

electrical poles at the City Hall 55. Res. 13-125-POW for the construction of additional classrooms at

Julio Ledesma National High School 56. Res. 13-126-POW for the Installation of air-conditioning units at the

City Treasurer’s Office 57. Res. 13-128-POW for the land forming of the City Hospital Project 58. Res. 13-130-Purchase of computer monitor for the Prosecutor’s

Office 59. Res. 13-131-Purchase of a multi-media projector for the ITCS Office 60. Res. 13-132-CDC Resolution No. 13-16, Series Of 2013, appropriating

Three Hundred Thirty Thousand Pesos (=P=330,000.00) for the purchase of Consumerism Materials in the City Waterworks;

61. Res. 13-133- CDC Resolution No. 13-15, Series Of 2013, construction of multi-purpose concrete pavement at So. Lagha, Brgy. Quezon, in the amount of =P=450,000.00;

62. Res. 13-134–POW for two (2) projects: (1) On-Site Relocation and Rehabilitation of Affected Houses and Structures at Brgy. San Juan, this city, in the amount of =P=1,280,000.00; (2) Construction of

78

Drainage System at Brgy. VI Relocation Site (Phase II), at Reclamation Project, Brgy. VI, this city, in the amount of =P=3,600,000.00;

63. Res. 13-136- POW for the acquisition of Lot 2-B 64. Res. 13-138- POW for the construction of a 390 cubic meter

reinforced concrete Sit-In Reservoir at the boulevard, Brgy. VI, this city, in the amount of =P=3,700,000.00;

65. Res. 13-139- MOA with Mr. Anselmo P. Cabrera (FUP Specialist), in the completion of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) of San Carlos City;

66. Res. 13-140- CDC Resolution No. 13-10, Series Of 2013, development of high value commercial crops’ a special project for the Upland Farmers worth Three Hundred Twenty Seven Thousand Pesos (P327,000.00);

67. Res. 13-141- MOA With Agtutunoy Mayupo, Mayana And Aguikit, Bago Watershed Integrated Farmers Association, Inc. (Amma, Bwifai);

68. Res. 13-143- POW for the procurement of submersible motors in the amount of =P=665,000.00;

69. Res. 13-155- POW for the repair and rehabilitation of canter sgv 819 in the amount of =P=300,000.00;

70. Res. 13-156- CDC Resolution No. 13-18 Series Of 2013, construction of secondary perimeter fence and concrete pathway at BJMP Compound, San Carlos City, in the amount of =P=300,000.00;

71. Res. 13-159- MOA with the Department of Health, Center for Health Development (DOH-CHD)-Western Visayas, relative to the Unified Health Management Information System (UHMIS);

72. Res. 13-160- MOA with the Government of the Philippines, Through Ms. Adeluisa G. Siapno, Regional Executive Director, Department Of Environment And Natural Resources (DENR), Region VI, relative to the LGU-LED Systematic Public Land Titling Program;

73. Res. 13-162- POW for two (2) projects: (1) concreting of road Lot 1, left road of Stage 2 of Phase IV, Fatima Village, with sidewalk, curb & gutter, =P= 2,520,000.00); and (2) Revised POW for the Installation of Air-Conditioning System at the City Treasurer’s Office from 3 units to 4 units (3 sets ceiling-mounted and 1 unit wall-mounted) in the total amount of =P=394,200.00);

74. Res. 13-164-MOA with the Dept. Of Agriculture, RFY VI, Iloilo City, for the establishment of Plant Nursery under the High Value Crops Development Program (HVCDP), in the total amount of P 114,182.34

75. Res. 13-165- Request of the Solid Waste Management Office for appropriation in the amount of =P=185,000.00 for the repair and maintenance of Garbage Compactor with Plate No. SHW 535;

79

76. Res 13-166- Purchase of one (1) unit Personal Computer, one (1) unit Laptop and one (1) unit Printer for the Public Employment Service Office (PESO) in the total amount of =P=69,200.00;

77. Res. 13-169- Deed Of Donation, with Mr. George S. Uy, for one (1) unit Garbage Compactor, in the amount of P750,000.00;

78. Res. 13-178- Purchase of flexible couplings and UPVC Pipes for the repair and maintenance of the city’s water system in the total amount of =P=293,965.00;

79. Res. 13-185- CDC Resolution No. 13-20 Series Of 2013, approving the request for appropriation for the rehabilitation of waterline from So. Minaabay to So. Mangkalasag, Brgy. Palampas, in the amount of =P=36,000.00;

80. Res. 13-186- POW for the construction of Public Market Office and Sports Office with comfort and dressing room at Purok Ilang-Ilang, Brgy. Quezon, in the amount of =P=250,000.00;

81. Res. 13-187- POW for the conversion of old sanitary office into Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program Office, 2nd Floor, Public Market Building, in the amount of =P=259,900.00;

82. Res. 13-188- Request of the San Carlos City PNP to use the excess amount of =P=33,831.00 from the appropriation intended to purchase three (3) units Personal Computer and Printer, to purchase an additional two (2) units Personal Computer (CPU Components Only);

83. Res. 13-193- POW for the dispersal and upgrading of native goats, in the amount of =P=50,000.00.

84. Res. 13-205– CDC Resolution Nos. 13-17, 13-19 And 13-23, Series Of 2013, approving different projects of the city;

85. Res 13-207-POW for The Electrification (Wiring Installation And Energization) Of The Health Center, So. Katiclan, Brgy. Rizal, In The Amount Of =P=64,000.00;

86. Res 13-209- General Overhauling Of The L300 Alpha (Plate # SGC 675) in the amount of P70,540.00;

87. Res 13-210- Purchase Of One (1) Unit Concrete Cutter In The Amount Of =P=70,000.00;

88. Res 13-217- MOA with The Dept. Of Social Welfare And Development Relative To The Implementation Of The Sustainable Livelihood Project (SLP) Under The Bottom-Up Budgeting 2013

89. Res 13-218- Financial Assistance of P250,000.00 for the Construction Of Comfort Room At The Boxing Gym, Brgy. VI

90. Res 13-223- MOA With DENR And Barangays Prosperidad, Rizal, Bagonbon And Nataban Relative To The Barangay Forest Program;

91. Res 13-229- Financial Assistance of P250,000.00 for the Construction Of Its Public Market Office And Sports Office With Comfort And Dressing Rooms, Brgy. Quezon

80

92. Res 13-230- CDC Resolution Nos. 13-22 And 13-24, Series Of 2013 approving different projects of the city;

93. Res 13-231-POW for The Pipe Laying Of UPVC Pipe And Installation Of One (1) Unit Stub-Out At Eco-Tourism National Highway With An Appropriation Of =P=30,500.00;

94. Res 13-235- MOA With DENR And Barangay Codcod, This City, Relative To The Barangay Forest Program ;

95. Res. 13-250–MOA with applicant beneficiary for the land titling program of pilot projects in Brgy. VI, Brgy. Guadalupe and Brgy. San Juan, Sipaway;

96. Res 13-258- Work And Financial Plan For The Post Survey Activities And Processing Of Patents/Titles Of Identified Public Residential Lands Located At Brgys. VI, San Juan And Guadalupe, all of San Carlos City, Negros Occidental;

97. Res 13-238- MOA With The Community Environment And Natural Resources (CENRO), Relative To The Allocation Of Funds For The Titling Program Of Pilot Projects In Brgys. VI, Guadalupe And San Juan Sipaway;

98. Res 13-241- Program Of Works For The Two Projects Of The City Government Of San Carlos:

99. Development of C-3 Road near SCBI Plant Presidential Bridge to Vasconia Road, Brgy. Palampas, 20% Development Fund (Road Development Program, CY 2013) in the amount of =P= 1,600,000.00

100. Rehabilitation of 22 units cubicles (Comfort Rooms) at the City Auditorium Lump Sum Appropriation CY 2013 in the amount of =P= 83,575..00

101. Res 13-261- MOU with the Philippine Overseas Employment Administration (POEA), The Overseas Workers Welfare Administration (OWWA), The Dept. Of Labor & Employment (DOLE) and the Technical Education & Skills Development Authority (TESDA), relative to the Protection and Support of Overseas Workers;

102. Res 13-259- POW for the Rehabilitation of Aglolo-Od Waterline, Brgy. Palampas, in the amount of =P=550,000.00;

103. Res 13-255- To utilize a portion of the Reclamation Area for the proposed Construction of San Carlos City Malnutrition and Rehabilitation Center and a portion of the People’s Park for the proposed Construction of Children’s Museum and Learning Center Funded By National Expenditures Program (NEP), FY 2013;

104. Res 13-251- MOA with Nabingkalan Tricycle Operators and Drivers

Association (NATODA) and San Carlos City Pedicab Operators and Drivers Association (SCAPODA), this city, relative to the livelihood projects for Transport Group;

105. Res 13-272 - CDC Resolution No. 13-29, Series of 2013, Approving The

125.

81

Request For Funding Augmentation Needed To Implement IEC (Citywide Barangays And Schools ESWM Capacity Building And Re-Orientation);

106. Res 13-236 – POW for the Vegetable Production Program At Acida, So. Medina, in the amount of =P=50,000.00;

107. Res. 13-275–MOA with Vresco- construction of one (1) unit primary pole at Jose Valmayor, Jr. Public Market, Brgy. IV, this city

108. Res. 13-274-implementation of CDC Res. No. 13-28, for the purchase of food and non-food items, to be used in times of emergencies

109. Res. 13-281- POW- construction of board walk and gazebo, people’s park, Brgy. III, in the amount of =P=1,400,000.00;

110. Res 13-288 - financial assistance to the victims of typhoon Yolanda, charged against the special trust fund of the local disaster risk reduction and management fund;

111. Res. 13-289 – Renaming the San Carlos City BJMP to San Carlos City District BJMP

112. Res 13-290 - with University Of St. La Salle, relative to the implementation of the school feeding program of Busog, Lusog Talino (The “Program”)

113. Res13-293 - financial assistance to Barangay III, this city, in the amount of =P=120,000.00 to subsidize the purchase of NFA rice, medicines and medical instruments for the use of their constituents

114. Res 13-294 - financial assistance to Barangay V, this city, in the amount of =P=100,000.00 to subsidize the various projects of the barangay

115. Res 13-305 – implementation of Organic Agriculture Farming System Project

116. Res 13-306 – POW- fabrication of 2-units steel grill at the Post Office 117. Res 13-297 – transfer of funds to Brgys. Bagonbon, Buluangan and

Palampas 118. Res 13-295 – purchase of computer units for the GSD and the CLDO 119. Res 13-298 – granting incentives to rice farmers relative to rice

production 120. Res 13-300 – transfer of funds to Brgys. I, II, II and V 121. Res 13-314 – loan assistance for the carabao project of the NFPA,

Brgy. Codcod 122. Res 13-310 – transfer of funds to Brgy. Ermita 123. Res 13-308 - POW-installation of CCTV with recorder for BJMP 124. Res 13-307 – purchase of 100pcs plastic tables for the City

Auditorium

!"#$%&'()$*&)+'$&,-$*(./01'

!"#$%&'()$*******************

+,-./01($-,$+,-./01/&2$!-1&3/-0)$*******************

4(5/-0)$*****************

%&'()$2034(51

!"#$678()

901-'($:2&;;) ***<#:$$$$***=;3$$$$***>0?$$$$***@,?$$$$$***A3B$$$$$***C3B$$$$$***D3B

+-8E2&3/-0)$********************

6-3&2$!&0?$F,(&$G/0$B&;H)$********************

%-I$-J$K&,&05&7;)$********************

%-I$-J$<-E;(B-2?;)$*******************

*(,&,)(&5$2034(51

94F$LB&,()$********************

!-1&2ML-E,1(?$4(.(0E(;)$$********************

N3B(,$4(.(0E(;)$$********************

6-3&2$!"#$901-'()$$********************

6)3'7'+18

***$F5,/1E23E,&2$O1-;7;3('

***$P-,(;3$O1-;7;3('

***$:-&;3&2$Q&,/0($O1-;7;3('

***$P,(;BR&3(,$O1-;7;3('

93/0('8$23+1,+(&5

***$K(&1B$4(;-,3

***$</;3-,7$&0?$:E23E,($G(I5IS$J-,3S$1&3B(?,&2$&0?$1BE,1BS$B/;3-,/1&2$,-&?S$B/;3-,/1&2$

$$$$$$$'-0E'(03S$'E;(E'S$;3,E13E,(;$&0?$TE/2?/05;H

***$<-3(2;

***$%&3E,&2$&33,&13/-0;

6)3,38()$:)+(;(+7$<=&,>$&))30-(,.57?$'>(@$(4$,3+$&@@5()&A51B

***$F5,/1E23E,&2

***$P/;B(,7

***$Q/0/05

***$90?E;3,/&2

***$:-''(,1/&2$&0?$L(,./1($:(03(,;

C3,+&)+$D,4308&+(3,

%&'($-J$Q&7-,$-,$"-.(,0-,)$$********************

6(2(8B-0($%E'T(,)$$********************

P&U$%E'T(,)$$********************

V(T;/3($F??,(;;)$$********************

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2013 - LGPMS

Performance Area: Administrative Governance Service Area: Local Legislation

Instruction:

1. Determine the quality of the Legislative Agenda by answering the following questions:

1.1 Is your Legislative Agenda supportive of the Executive Agenda?YesPartialNo

1.2 Is the agenda a product of research or a product of consultations with stakeholders?YesPartialNo

Notes:1. It refers to a particular session of the sanggunian. Sec. 52 of the LG Code of 1991 mandates the conduct of aweekly regular session for the sanggunian except for the sangguniang barangays.2. The Legislative Agenda supports the Executive Agenda by way of: (1)appropriations ordinances, 2)othersupportive legislative enactments like policies, rules or guidelines in carrying out items in the Executive Agenda, or(3)thru the exercise of legislative oversight function. Answer “Yes” if the sanggunian fully or excellently performsall of the three items, “Partial” if the sanggunian partially or satisfactorily performs the three items, or “No if thesanggunian failed to or poorly performs the three items.3. Answer “Yes” if all items in the agenda are researched, studied or are the results of consultations, “Partial” ifsome but not all of the items in the agenda are researched, studied or results of consultations, or “No” if the agendais neither a product of research nor a product of consultation with stakeholders.

2. Does your sanggunian have a system that tracks information on local legislations?

Yes No If Yes, is the tracking system capable of generating information on?2.1 Existing local rules and regulations which complement national laws or policies

YesNo

2.2 Existing local rules and regulations which are being enforcedYesNo

2.3 Existing local rules and regulations which are not being enforcedYesNo

2.4 Existing local rules and regulations to avoid duplication of legislationYesNo

2.5 The status of a draft ordinance in the legislative processYesNo

2.6 Nature of the Legislative Tracking System Computerized

Administrative Governance: p-1

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

Computer-AidedManual

Notes:1. Computerized means that an embedded system is specially developed for tracking legislative enactments andactions, with real-time computing and reporting design. Computer-aided means that there is no special systemdesigned for legislative tracking and actions but used existing computer functions such as excel or access for thepurpose. Manual means that all documents are indexed and processed without the help of a computer.

3. Which of the following Codes are already enacted by the sanggunian?

3.1 Code of General OrdinancesYesNo

3.2 Revenue CodeYesNo

3.3 Local Investment and Incentive CodeYesNo

3.4 Market CodeYesNoNA

3.5 Health and Sanitation CodeYesNo

3.6 Code for ChildrenYesNo

3.7 Gender and Development CodeYesNo

3.8 Environmental CodeYesNo

3.9 Zoning OrdinanceYesNo

Notes:1. Those codes are in support of Administrative Functions, Regulatory Mandates, Corporate Objectives, SocialDevelopment, Economic Development and Environmental Management of the LGU. Decisions of the sangguniancome in four (4) major types – administrative in intent, regulatory in nature, corporate in purpose anddevelopmental in focus.2. A code contains ordinances on the same subject matter regardless of the year of enactment, in a codified manner.It embodies local rules and regulations drawn from such ordinances or resolutions which partake the nature ofordinances. Codification implies the following processes: revision, amendment and supplementation, the latter as away to update the code in consideration of new laws or new ordinances on the same subject matter. An exception to

Administrative Governance: p-2

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

this is the Code of General Ordinances which contains different subjects which are administrative in nature andintent.3. "NA" means not applicable.

4. Determine the percentage (%) of ordinances over legislative measures.

96 - 100 % 91 - 95 % 86 - 90 % 80 - 85 % below 80%

Notes:1. To compute, (Total number of ordinances / Total legislative measures x 100)2. Benchmark: 90\% - Target estimate

Performance Area: Administrative Governance Service Area: Development Planning

Instruction:

1. Is the Local Development Council organized?

Yes No If Yes, determine the functionality of the LDC based on composition, meetings, and performance.On composition:1.1 Is the LDC composition in accordance with the LG Code?

YesPartialNo

1.2 Is the Executive Committee3 organized pursuant to the LG Code? YesPartialNo

1.3 Are Sectoral or Functional Committees organized to assist the LDC?YesNo

On meetings:1.4 Does the LDC meet at least once every six months?

YesNo

1.5 Does the Executive Committee meet as often as necessary? YesNo

1.6 Does the Sectoral or Functional Committees meet as often as necessary?YesNo

1.7 Is there an organized agenda for every meeting?YesPartial

Administrative Governance: p-3

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

No1.8 Is every meeting documented?

YesPartialNo

1.9 Are the decisions embodied through resolutions of the LDC or of the Sectoral or Functional Committees?YesPartialNo

1.10 On performance4:GoodSomewhat GoodPoor

Notes:1. LDC is organized when there is an executive or legislative issuance for that matter.2. LDC composition is based on Sec.107 of LG Code of 1991, as follows: The City Mayor or Municipal Mayor, in the case of City or Municipal Development Council, as Head. All PunongBarangays in the locality; the Chairman of the Committee on Appropriations of the Sanggunian Panlungsod orSangguniang Bayan; the Congressman or His representative; and Representatives of non-governmentalorganizations operating in the city or municipality, as members. NGO representatives shall constitute not less thanone-fourth (1/4) of the members of the fully organized council.

The Governor, in the case of the Provincial Development Council, as Head. All Mayors of component cities andmunicipalities; the Chairman of the Committee on Appropriations of the Sanggunian Panlalawigan; theCongressman or His representative; and Representatives of the non-government organization operating in theprovince, as members. NGO representatives shall constitute not less than one-fourth (1/4) of the members of fullyorganized council.

Or in the case of ARMM, LDC composition is based on Sec. 108 of LG Code of the Autonomous Region inMuslim Mindanao, as follows: The City Mayor or Municipal Mayor, in the case of City or MunicipalDevelopment Council, as Head. The Chairman of the Committee on Appropriations of the Sanggunian Panlungsodor Sangguniang Bayan; the Congressman or His representative; the Assemblymen or their representatives; andRepresentatives of non-governmental organizations operating in the city or municipality, as members. NGOrepresentatives shall constitute not less than one-fourth (1/4) of the members of the fully organized council.

The Governor, in the case of the Provincial Development Council, as Head. All Mayors of component cities andmunicipalities; the Chairman of the Committee on Appropriations of the Sanggunian Panlalawigan; theCongressman or His representative; and Representatives of the non-government organization operating in theprovince, as members. NGO representatives shall constitute not less than one-fourth (1/4) of the members of fullyorganized council.

3.The Executive Committee of the City or Municipal Development Council shall be composed of the City Mayoror Municipal Mayor as Chairman: the Chairman of the Committee on appropriations of the sanggunian panlungsodor bayan; the president of the city or municipality’s League of Barangays; and a representative ofnongovernmental organizations that are represented in the council, as members.

Administrative Governance: p-4

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

The Provincial Development Council Executive Committee shall be composed of the Governor as chairman: theRepresentative of component city and municipal mayors to be chosen form among themselves; the Chairman of theCommittee on Appropriations of the Sanggunian Panlalawigan; the President of the Provincial League ofBarangays; and a Representative of nongovernmental organizations that are represented in the council, as members.

4. LDC Performance is “Good” if the LDC was able to formulate, or update, long-term, medium-term and annualsocio-economic development plans and policies; formulate, or update, medium-term and annual public investmentprograms; appraise and prioritize socio-economic development programs and projects; formulate, or update, localinvestment incentives to promote the inflow and direction of private investment capital; and coordinate, monitorand evaluate the implementation of development programs and projects. LDC Performance is “Somewhat Good” ifat least one of the functions mentioned above is not exercised. LDC Performance is “Poor” if none of the functionsmentioned above is exercised.

2. Does the Planning and Development Coordination Office maintain a database for development planning?

Yes No If Yes, does the database contain updated:2.1 demographic data, e.g. growth rate, population density, etc.

YesPartialNo

2.2 social development data, e.g. data on education, health, housing and basic utilities, peace and order, etc.YesPartialNo

2.3 economic development data, e.g. data on poverty, labor and employment, etc.YesPartialNo

2.4 environmental data, e.g. data on forest, agricultural, coastal marine, freshwater, biodiversity and urban ecosystems,etc.

YesPartialNo

2.5 physical land use dataYesPartialNo

2.6 institutional data whether of the local government or of the non-government sector, e.g. financial data, personnelcompetencies, list of NGOs and their thrusts

YesPartialNo

2.7 Does your LGU use a Geographic Information System (GIS)?YesNo

Administrative Governance: p-5

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

Notes:1. A database is a mass or organized data stored in a computer.2. For question 2.1, answer “Yes” if essential data are complete, and that reports and plans can be done with easesince all the information needed are readily available, “Partial” if some of the data are there but not complete andthat reports and plans can be done with little difficulty since some of the data are not readily available, or “No” ifmost if not all of the data are absent and that reports and plans can be done with utmost difficulty since most of thedata are not readily available.

4. Does your LGU have a Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP)?

Yes No If Yes, Is the CDP formulated in accordance with the following?4.1 Participatory in its formulation

YesPartialNo

4.2 Socio-economic development thrusts are embodied in the PlanYesNo

4.3 Development strategies are embodied in the PlanYesNo

4.4 Local Development Investment Program, which contains the list of programs and projects with correspondingcosts to be funded from internal or external sources, is an integral component of the CDP.

YesNo

4.5 Monitoring and Evaluation is an integral component of the PlanYesNo

4.6 Supportive of overall provincial development thrustsYesNoNA

4.7 Is the CDP updated, at least every six years?YesNo

Notes:1. Partial means that not all concerned stakeholders are consulted.

5. Does your LGU have an approved Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP)?

Yes No If Yes, is the CLUP formulated in accordance with the following?5.1 Participatory in its formulation

YesPartialNo

5.2 Demography, socio-economic, infrastructure and utilities, land use and local administration are integral sectors in

Administrative Governance: p-6

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

the Plan.YesNo

5.3 Consistent with the Provincial Development Physical Framework Plan (for component cities only)YesNoNA

5.4 Monitoring and evaluation is an integral component of the planYesNo

5.5 Is the CLUP updated, every 10 or 15 years?YesNo

Notes:1. Partial means that not all concerned stakeholders are consulted.

6. Does your LGU have an Annual Investment Program (AIP)?

Yes No If Yes, is the AIP prepared in accordance to the following?6.1 Consistent with the Local Development Investment Program

YesNo

6.2 Embodies the following minimum information: projects to be undertaken, for whom (area coverage and targetbeneficiaries), how, by whom, and when

YesNo

6.3 Financing is an integral component of the PlanYesNo

6.4 Monitoring and evaluation is an integral componentYesNo

7. Does your LGU have an Executive and Legislative Agenda (bonus point)?

Yes No

Performance Area: Administrative Governance Service Area: Revenue Generation

Instruction:

1. Determine the efficiency of system (methods or procedures) on LGU-imposed or collected taxes, fees andcharges.

System on all local taxes, fees and charges1.1 Operates on a network that is in interlinked with computers in the Offices of the Assessor, Business Permits andLicensing Officer and the Treasurer

Administrative Governance: p-7

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

YesNo

1.2 Incentive scheme is provided to promote efficiency in real property assessment and real property tax collectionYesNo

1.3 Civil remedies on tax delinquencies are enforcedYesNo

1.4 Information is disseminated on any proposed imposition and on the schedule of market values used for assessment.YesNo

1.5 Guided by a Local Revenue Code, which is not more than 5 years old.YesNo

System on Real Property Tax1.6 Guided by updated real property tax maps for property identification

YesNo

1.7 Real property records and information are indexed to facilitate access, at the very least time possible, by realproperty owners.

YesNo

System on Business Tax1.9 Tax records management, i.e., conduct of business tax mapping, establishment of a revenue data bank, and regularupdating of the list of taxpayers.

YesNo

1.10 Implementation of revenue enhancement measuresYesNo

2. Does your LGU have an Annual Revenue Generation Plan ?

Yes No If Yes, determine the quality of the plan, using the following criteria:2.1 Embodies local revenue policy direction(s) for the given year.

YesNo

2.2. Contains strategies that have to be undertaken in order to yield the amount of revenues estimated to be collected forthe given year.

YesNo

2.3 Identifies local government personnel responsible for each strategy.YesNo

2.4 Includes the amount of revenues projected or estimated to be generated annually from real property taxes, businesstaxes, fees and charges, and from other potential sources such as donations, grants, and share from national wealth.

Yes

Administrative Governance: p-8

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

No2.5 Monitoring and evaluation is an integral component of the Plan

YesNo

2.6 Utilized by local financial generation managers in monitoring accomplishments, lapses and misses in revenuegeneration.

YesNo

2.7 Used as a principal reference document in updating the Revenue Code (answer only if there is a Revenue Code).YesNoNA

Notes:1. Annual Revenue Generation Plan pertains to a plan that is patterned after the Resource Mobilization Manual ofBLGF.

3. Determine the percentage of cost to collect revenues to total locally-sourced revenues.

Cost to collect revenues to total locally-sourced revenues (in %)

Notes:1. Cost to collect revenues include salaries of collection agents, operations (computerization), public addressnotices, and advertisements, among others.2. Locally-sourced revenue is composed of tax and non-tax revenues. Tax revenues are sourced from RealProperty Tax, Business Tax, and other taxes. Non-tax revenues are those that come from regulatory fees,service/user charges, receipts from economic enterprise, toll fees, and other receipts.3. To compute, (Revenue collection cost ÷ total locally-sourced revenue) x 100.

4. How much is your actual collection from Real Property Tax (RPT) out of the RPT collectibles (in percentage)?

Real Property Tax Accomplishment Rate (in %)

Notes:1. To compute, (amount of RPT collected ÷ amount of projected RPT collection) x 100.

5. How much of the total LGU income is generated from local sources (in percentage)?

Locally Sourced to Total LGU income (in %)

Notes:1. Locally-sourced revenue is composed of tax and non-tax revenues. Tax revenues are sourced from RealProperty Tax, Business Tax, and other taxes. Non-tax revenues are those that come from regulatory fees,service/user charges, receipts from economic enterprise, toll fees, and other receipts.2. Total LGU income is composed of locally sourced revenues, IRA, other share from national, and specialrevenues, i.e., extraordinary receipts/financial aids, loans and borrowings, and inter-local fund transfers. 3. To compute, (Locally Sourced Revenues ÷ Total LGU Income) x 100.

6. What is the proportion of regular revenues to total LGU income (in percentage)?

Regular Revenue to Total Income (in %)

Administrative Governance: p-9

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

Notes:1. Regular revenues mean locally-sourced revenues plus IRA. 2. Total LGU income is composed of locally sourced revenues, IRA, other share from national, and specialrevenues, i.e., extraordinary receipts/financial aids, loans and borrowings, and inter-local fund transfers. 3. To compute, (Regular Revenues ÷ Total income) x 100

Performance Area: Administrative Governance Service Area: Resource Allocation and Utilization

Instruction:

1. On Resource AllocationDoes your LGU operate on a re-enacted budget during the profile year?

Yes No If No, is the Annual Budget approved in consideration of the following?:1.1 Responsive to the budgetary requirements of the Annual Investment Program

YesNo

Satisfies the following budgetary, statutory, and contractual requirements and general limitations:Budgetary requirements:1.2 Amount appropriated did not exceed the estimates of income

YesNo

1.3 The amount of appropriations for debt servicing did not exceed 20\% of the regular income (answer only ifapplicable)

YesNoNA

1.4 20% component of IRA was appropriated for development projectsYesNo

1.5 Provision for aid to barangays is not less than PhP 1,000YesNo

General limitations:1.6 Appropriations for discretionary purposes did not exceed 2\% of the actual receipts from basic real property tax

YesNo

1.7 The total appropriations whether annual or supplemental for personal services did not exceed 45% for 1st-3rd class,and 55% for 4th-6th class.

YesNo

Others:1.8 An amount is appropriated for Gender and Development projects and activities (R.A. 7192 and E.O. 273, s. 1995)

at least 5% of the total budgetless than 5%None at all

Administrative Governance: p-10

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

1.9 An amount is appropriated for the operation and maintenance of the Office for Senior Citizens Affairs (R.A. 9257)YesNo

1.10 An amount is appropriated for the monitoring or surveillance of the magnitude of Acquired Immune DeficiencySyndrome or AIDS (RA 8504)

YesNo

1.11 1% of the IRA is appropriated for the strengthening and implementation of the programs of the Local Council forthe Protection of Children (R.A. 9344)

YesNo

1.12 Approved within the period, October 17 to Dec. 31YesNo

2. On Resource UtilizationWhat is the proportion of your LGU’s expenditures for personal services to total LGU expenditure (inpercentage)?

Personal Services Expenditure Ratio (in %)

Notes:1. To compute, (personnel services expenditures ÷ total expenditures) x 100.

3. Determine the amount of services extended by your LGU to its constituents on a per capita basis.

Total Expenditures per capita (in PhP)

Notes:1. To compute, (Total expenditures ÷ population).

4. Proportion of actual debt service payment of your LGU to total regular income (in %). Has your LGU availedloan?

Yes No If yes, determine the proportion of actual debt service payment.Debt Service Ratio (in %)

Notes:1. Total regular income means locally-sourced income plus IRA.2. To compute, (actual cost for debt servicing ÷ total regular income) x 100.

Performance Area: Administrative Governance Service Area: Customer Service - Civil Applications

Instruction:

1. On Civil Registry DocumentsDetermine the quality of customer service in the processing of civil registry documents, i.e., birth and deathcertificates, using the following criteria:

1.1 Has a database of civil registry recordsYesNo

Administrative Governance: p-11

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

1.2 Set of steps in getting the civil registry records is made known to clients (either through website, posters or othermeans.)

YesNo

1.3 Procedure is clear (i.e., step or steps, processing time, processing fee, transaction hour, etc.)YesNo

1.4. How long does it take to issue a civil registry document, i.e., birth or death certificate?30 mins. or lessMore than 30 mins., but less than 2 hours2 hours or more

Notes:1. Processing Procedure - Computerized means that an embedded system is specially developed for the indexingand processing of real property documents, with real-time computing and reporting design. Computer-aidedmeans that there is no special system designed for the indexing and processing of real property documents but usedexisting computer functions such as excel or access. Manual means that all documents are indexed and processedwithout the help of a computer.

2. On Real Property DocumentsDetermine the quality of customer service in the processing of real property documents, using the followingcriteria:

2.1 Processing of real property documentsComputerizedComputer-AidedManual

2.2 Procedure in securing real property documents is made known to clients (either through website, posters or othermeans.)

YesNo

2.3 Procedure is clear (i.e., step or steps, processing time, processing fee, transaction hour, etc.)YesNo

2.4 Procedure is simple – not more than 4 steps, 4 documentary requirements, and 2 number of signatoriesYesNo

2.5. How long does it take to issue a real property document?30 minutes or lessMore than 30 minutes but less than 8 hours8 hours or more

Notes:1. Processing of real property documents - Computerized means that an embedded system is specially developedfor the indexing and processing of real property documents, with real-time computing and reporting design. Computer-aided means that there is no special system designed for the indexing and processing of real propertydocuments but used existing computer functions such as excel or access. Manual means that all documents areindexed and processed without the help of a computer.

Administrative Governance: p-12

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

Performance Area: Administrative Governance Service Area: Human Resource Management and Development

Instruction:

1. Determine the quality of human resource management and development, using the following criteria:

1.1 Recruitment and selection are transparentYesPartialNo

1.2 Permanency in the nature of appointments is valuedYesNo

1.3 Good performance is recognizedYesNo

1.4 Staff development is availableYesNo

1.5 Grievance system is in placeYesNo

Notes:1. For 1.1, answer “Yes” if all recruitment and selection processes and results, whether for plantilla or non-plantillapositions, are posted, “Partial” if some of the recruitment and selection process and results, whether for plantilla ornon-plantilla positions, are posted, “No” if recruitment and selection processes and results, whether for plantilla ornon-plantilla positions, are not posted.2. For 1.2, answer “Yes” if at least 90\% of the total employees of the LGU occupy plantilla positions, “No” ifbelow 90\% of the total employees of the LGU occupy plantilla positions.3. For 1.3, answer “Yes” if good performers are recognized and given incentives in the form of cash or in kind.Recognition is made either through personnel evaluation, written recommendation, or public acknowledgment.4. For 1.4, answer “Yes” if staff development activities or opportunities are made available to staff, regardless oflevel, or position in a given level, with low performance or to those staff who need career advancement5. For 1.5, answer “Yes” if there is a grievance system where employees can air their grievances and properlyresponded to or acted upon. If this condition is not met, answer “No”.

Administrative Governance: p-13

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

Performance Area: Social Governance Service Area: Health Services

Instruction:

1. On LHB functionality. Is the Local Health Board (LHB) organized1?

Yes No If Yes, determine the functionality of the LHB based on composition, meetings, and performance.On Composition:1.1 Is the LHB composition in accordance with the LG Code2?

YesPartialNo

On meetings:1.2 Does the LHB meet at least once a month, or as often as necessary?

YesNo

1.3 Is there an organized agenda for every meeting?YesPartialNo

1.4 Is every meeting documented?YesPartialNo

1.5 On performance3:GoodSomewhat GoodPoor

Notes: 1. LHB is organized when there is an executive or legislative issuance for that matter.

2. LHB composition is based on Sec.102 of LG Code of 1991 or Sec. 98 of the LG Code of ARMM as follows: Governor or City Mayor or Municipal Mayor, as the case maybe, as Chairman: Health Officer as Vice-Chairman;Chairman of the Committee on Health of the Sanggunian Panlalawigan or Sangguniang Panlungsod, SangguniangBayan; a Representative from the Private Sector or non-governmental organizations involved in health services;and a Representative of the Department of Health in the LGU, as members

3. LHB Performance is “Good” if the LHB was able to propose to the sanggunian annual budgetary appropriationsfor the operation and maintenance of health facilities and services within the LGU, and able to provide advice tothe sanggunian on health matters such as the necessity for, and application of, local appropriations for publichealth purposes. LHB Performance is “Somewhat Good” if at least one of the functions mentioned above is notperformed. LHB Performance is “Poor” if none of the functions mentioned above is performed.

2. On Quality of Primary Health Care (basic curative service).

2.1 Basic medical supplies and equipment

Social Governance: p-1

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

Complete and FunctionalSome are available and functional but some are notNone at all

2.2 Basic medicinesAlways availableAvailable most of the timeNot available most of the timeNone at all

2.3 Health referral system is establishedYesNo

2.4 The facility is always clean and maintainedYesNo

2.5 Physician or a medical staffRegularly stationed as scheduledMost of the time availableMost of the time not availableNo physician or medical staff stationed

2.6 Patients recording system is establishedYesNo

3. On Quality of maternal care.

3.1 Safe motherhood and family planning consultationRegularly available as scheduledSometimes not availableNot available at all

3.2 Pre-natal check-up, including tetanus toxoid vaccination to pregnant womenRegularly availableSometimes not availableNot available at all

3.3 Breast feeding campaign is supported. Pregnant women are educated with the importance of breast feeding,especially within 1 hour after birth

YesNo

3.4 Post-partum care or check-up after deliveryRegularly availableSometimes not availableNot available at all

4. On Quality of child care.

4.1 Regular check up for children is availableYesNo

4.2 OPV3, DPT3, Hep B3 and Measles vaccination to infants before 12 months of age is ensuredYes

Social Governance: p-2

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

No4.3 Program to counter malnutrition is undertaken

YesNo

4.4 Basic dental or oral health care services are available (filling, extraction and cleaning, and proper oral health careinformation)

YesNo

4.5 Information on proper child care is disseminated through various means, e.g. poster, brochure, consultation,forum, etc.

YesNo

5. On Other Innovative Health Services.

5.1 Conduct regular medical missions in partnership with a non-governmental organization or with the private sectorYesNo

5.2 Provide Philhealth Cards to poor families YesNo

Performance Area: Social Governance Service Area: Support to Education Services

Instruction:

1. On LSB functionality. Is the Local School Board (LSB) organized1?

Yes No If Yes, determine the functionality of the LSB based on composition, meetings, and performance.On composition:1.1 Is the LSB composition in accordance to the LG Code?

YesPartialNo

On meetings:1.2 Does the LSB meet at least once a month, or as often as necessary?

YesNo

1.3 Is there an organized agenda for every meeting?YesPartialNo

1.4 Is every meeting documented?YesPartialNo

1.5 On performance:

Social Governance: p-3

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

GoodSomewhat GoodPoor

Notes:1. LSB is organized when there is an executive or legislative issuance for that matter.

2. LSB composition is based on Sec. 98 of LG Code of 1991 or Section 94 of the LG Code of ARMM. The localschool board shall be composed of the Governor or City Mayor or Municipal Mayor, as the case maybe, and the division superintendent or city superintendent or district supervisor of schools as co-chairmen; the chairman of theeducation committee of the sangguniang panlalawigan or sangguniang panlungsod or sangguniang bayan, theprovincial or city or municipal treasurer, the representative of the pederasyon ng mga sangguniang kabataan in thesanggunian, the duly elected president of the federation of parents-teachers associations, the duly electedrepresentative of the teachers' organizations, and the duly elected representative of the non-academic personnel ofpublic schools in the LGU, as members.

3. LSB Performance is “Good” if the LSB was able to: (1) determine the annual supplementary budgetary needsand cost for the operation and maintenance of public schools, which shall be reflected in the form of an annualschool board budget; (2) ensure that the disbursement of funds from the Special Education Fund is in accordancewith the prepared budget and consistent with the existing rules and regulations; and (3) provide advice to theSanggunian on educational matters such as the necessity for, and the uses of local appropriations for educationalpurposes. LSB Performance is “Somewhat Good” if at least one of the functions mentioned above is not exercised. LSB Performance is “Poor” if none of the functions mentioned above is exercised.

2. On support to elementary and secondary education from the Special Education Fund. Determine which of thefollowing services is extended by your LGU in support of elementary and secondary education which arefunded out of Special Education Fund per Sections 100 and 272 of the LGC of 1991, and Art. 363 of the IRR ofthe LGC.

2.1 Construction, repair or maintenance of school buildings, facilities and equipment of public elementary andsecondary schools

YesNo

2.2 Educational researchYesNo

2.3 Purchase of books and periodicals YesNo

2.4 Establishment or maintenance of extension classes, to include hiring of extension teachers, where necessaryYesNo

2.5 Sports developmentYesNo

3. On support to basic education from the General Fund. Determine which of the following services is extended byyour LGU in support of education which are funded out of the General Fund.

3.1 Implementation of a scholarship program

Social Governance: p-4

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

YesNo

3.2 Maintenance of a public libraryYesNo

3.3 Construction of extension classroomYesNo

3.4 Hiring of extension class teachers YesNo

4. On the Alternative Learning System. Does your LGU implement an Alternative Learning System?

Yes No If Yes, determine the quality of the Alternative Learning System (ALS), using the following criteria:4.1 The ALS focuses on functional literacy and skills training of target beneficiaries

YesNo

4.2 The ALS promotes gender sensitivity, equality and developmentYesNo

4.3 Resources, including staff and funds, are availableYesPartialNo

4.4 Target beneficiaries are aware of the alternative learning systemYesPartialNo

4.5 Practical skills gained from the system are known to be applied by many of the beneficiariesYesNo

Notes:1. On 4.3, “Partial” means there are resources available but not sufficient.2. On 4.4, “Partial” means not all of the target beneficiaries are aware of the alternative learning system.

Performance Area: Social Governance Service Area: Support to Housing and Basic Utilities

Instruction:

1. Does your LGU maintain a database for the housing sector?

Yes No If Yes, does the database contain:1.1 updated inventory of informal settlers

YesNo

Social Governance: p-5

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

1.2 updated inventory of makeshift housesYesNo

1.3 sites for potential socialized housingYesNo

1.4 updated inventory of households with access to water supplyYesNo

1.5 updated inventory of household with access to electricityYesNo

Notes:1. There are 3 levels. Level 1 – artesian well. Level 2 – artesian well but communal in use. Level 3 - piped watersystem, communal

2. Determine the types of services provided for the housing sector

2.1 Donation of lots for socialized housing YesNo

2.2 Provision of socialized housing or mass dwelling YesNo

Performance Area: Social Governance Service Area: Peace, Security and Disaster Risk Management

Instruction:

1. On Peace and Security

On POC functionality. Is the Peace and Order Council (POC) organized1?Yes No

If Yes, determine the functionality of the POC based on composition, meetings, and performance.On composition:1.1 Is the POC composition in accordance with Section 1 of Executive Order No. 773, 20092?

YesPartialNo

On meetings:1.2 Does the POC meet as often as necessary?

YesNo

1.3 Is there an organized agenda for every meeting?YesPartialNo

1.4 Is every meeting documented?

Social Governance: p-6

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

YesPartialNo

1.5 On performance3:GoodSomewhat GoodPoor

Notes:1. POC is organized when there is an executive or legislative issuance for that matter.

2. POC composition: The Local Peace and Order Council shall be composed of the LGU counterparts of thedepartments, offices and agencies as enumerated in paragraph (a) of E.O. 773, wherever applicable, with theGovernor or Mayor, as the case maybe, as Chairman and the respective Vice Governor or Vice-Mayor as Vice-Chairman. In addition, there shall be one representative of the Sanggunian to be chosen by it from among itsmembers.

The Governor as Chairman of the PPOC shall appoint the three (3) representatives of the private sector, uponconsultation with the members of the Council and with the approval of the Commander of the Infantry Division andthe Regional Director of the PNP. The provincial counterpart of the CSAFP shall be the Brigade Commander or, inthe case of Palawan, the Commander of the Western Command. Departments, Offices and agencies with noprovincial and/or field offices shall not sit in the PPOC.

The City Mayor or Municipal Mayor, as the case maybe, as Chairman of the CPOC or MCOP shall appoint thethree (3) representatives from the private sector, upon consultation with the members of the Council and uponacquiring appropriate security clearances. Departments, offices and agencies with no city, municipality and/or fieldoffices shall not sit in the CPOC or MPOC.

3. POC Performance is “Good” if the POC was able to: (1) formulate, or update, the Integrated Area CommunityPublic Safety Plan which contains measures aimed at improving peace and order and public safety in the localgovernment unit, (2) monitor the implementation of peace and order programs, and to address problems, if any,through action of its own or action of other competent authorities made possible through an effective referralsystem, or (3) undertake a periodic assessment of the prevailing peace and order situation in the local governmentunit. POC Performance is “Somewhat Good” if at least one of the functions mentioned above is not exercised. POC Performance is “Poor” if none of the functions mentioned above is exercised.

2. On the Quality of the Integrated Area Community Public Safety Plan. Does your LGU have an Integrated AreaCommunity Public Safety Plan?

Yes No If Yes, determine the quality of the Plan using the following criteria:2.1 Participatory in its formulation

YesPartialNo

Social Governance: p-7

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

2.2 Needs-based priority project(s) to enhance peace and order and public safety are integral components of the PlanYesPartialNo

2.3 Financing is an integral component of the PlanYesPartialNo

2.4 M&E is an integral component of the PlanYesNo

2.5 Updated annuallyYesNo

Notes:1 “Partial” means not all identified stakeholders participated in the formulation of the Plan.2 “Partial” means that not all priority needs in enhancing peace and order and public safety are incorporated in thePlan3 “Partial“ means that not all identified projects are backed up with funding support.

3. On the quality of accomplishments. Determine the quality of accomplishments using the following criteria:

3.1 On the focus – projects implemented are consistent with priority project(s) embodied in the PlanYesPartialNo

3.2 On the result(s) – demonstrable and quantifiable reduction in the incidence of crimes as compared to the previousyear, e.g., reduced incidence of drug abuse, reduced incidence of illegal gambling, etc.

Incidence of crime reduced compared to last yearIncidence of crime increased compared to last year

4. On the provision of sites for protective services. Does your city or municipal government provide sites for thefollowing?

4.1 Police Station(s)YesNo

4.2 Fire Station(s)YesNo

4.3 City/Municipal JailYesNo

5. On Child ProtectionOn LCPC functionality. Is the Local Council for the Protection of Children organized1

?

Yes No If Yes, determine the functionality of the LCPC based on composition, meetings, and performance.On composition:

Social Governance: p-8

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

5.1 Is the LCPC composition in accordance with DILG Memorandum Circular No. 2002-121, s. 20022?YesPartialNo

On meetings:5.2 Does the LCPC meet as often as necessary?

YesNo

5.3 Is there an organized agenda for every meeting?YesPartialNo

5.4 Is every meeting documented?YesPartialNo

On Performance:5.5 The Local Council for the Protection of Children is able to cause for the approval of a legislation on child survival,protection, participation and development, for the inclusion in the local annual appropriation funds to support efforts topromote child survival, protection, participation and development, and is able to assist children in need of specialprotection.

YesNo

Notes:1. LCPC is organized when there is an executive or legislative issuance for that matter.2 LCPC composition: City Mayor as Chair. Members – sanggunian member, chairperson on the Committee onWomen and Family; DILG City Field Officer, Division Superintendent/District Supervisor, DepEd; Local Laborand Employment Officer; Local Planning and Development Officer; Budget Officer; Health Officer; SocialWelfare and Development Officer; Nutrition Officer; Chief of Police; Treasurer; Liga ng mga Barangay President;SK Federation President; Parent-Teacher Association (PTA) President; Child Representative; at least (3)representatives of non-government organizations, two (2) of whom are appointed by the Committee handling EarlyChildhood and Development Programs and (1) from the trade/labor union sector. The Mayor may designate any ofthe members as co-chair.

6. On Katarungang PambarangayAdequacy of financial support to the Lupong Tagapamayapa. Does your city or municipal government provideappropriations for the implementation of the Katarungang Pambarangay?

Yes No If yes, determine whether your city or municipal government provides adequate financial support in the implementationof the katarungang pambarangay, using the criteria below:6.1 Does the appropriation include financial benefits of the Lupon (e.g., allowances, insurance coverage, etc.)?

YesNo

6.2 Does the appropriation provide for the Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses (e.g. supplies, electricalconsumption, office rental, transportation cost)?

YesNo

Social Governance: p-9

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

6.3 Does the appropriation provide funding for the conduct of continuing education for the Lupon members?YesNo

6.4 Does the appropriation cover expenses for capital outlays (e.g., office fixtures, transportation service, etc.)?YesNo

Notes:1. Section 422 of the LG Code of 1991 mandates that the city or municipal government shall provideappropriations for the effective implementation of the Katarungang Pambarangay.

7. On the quantity of disputes resolved. What is the percentage of interpersonal disputes resolved through theLupong Tagapamayapa?

80 % or more 51- 79 % 50% or belowNotes:1. To compute, (total number of interpersonal disputes resolved through all the Lupong Tagapamayapa ÷ totalnumber of interpersonal disputes brought to all Lupong Tagapamayapa for resolution) x 100.

8. On the quality of settlements. Describe the extent of amicable settlements sustained under the KatarangangPambarangay.

98% to 100% of cases resolved were sustained or not repudiated 50-97% of cases resolved were sustained or not repudiated Below 50% of cases resolved were repudiatedNotes:1. To compute, (total number of disputes resolved without repudiation ÷ total number of disputes resolved) x 1002. Section 418 of the LG Code states that: “Any party to the dispute may, within ten (10) days from the date of thesettlement, repudiate the same by filing with the lupon chairman a statement to that effect sworn to before him,where the consent is vitiated by fraud, violence, or intimidation. Such repudiation shall be sufficient basis for theissuance of a certification for filing a complaint.”

9. On Disaster Risk ManagementOn the LDCC Functionality. Is the Local Disaster Coordinating Council (LDCC) organized?

Yes No If Yes, determine the functionality of the LDCC using the criteria below:On organization and composition:9.1 Is the LDCC composition in accordance with Presidential Decree No. 1566, s. 1978?

YesPartialNo

9.2 Are support groups and community volunteers organized?YesNo

On meetings:9.3 Does the LDCC meet as often as necessary?

YesSocial Governance: p-10

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

No9.4 Is there an organized agenda for every meeting?

YesPartialNo

9.5 Is every meeting documented?YesPartialNo

on program, budgetary support and other management tools:9.6 Is the LDCC able to integrate Disaster Risk Management in the Comprehensive Development Plan, LocalDevelopment Investment Plan and Annual Investment Program?

YesNo

9.7 Is the LDCC able to formulate an Operations Manual, incorporating therein a communications strategy and M&E?YesNo

Notes:1. LDCC Composition: Governor or City Mayor or Municipal Mayor, as the case maybe, as Chairman. TheProvincial Director or the City Director, or the Chief of Police of the Philippine National Police shall be theVice-Chairman. All organic local officials, as well as national officials working at the provincial or city ormunicipal level, as members. The Provincial or City or Municipal Civil Defense Deputized Coordinators shall actas action officer of the council. (Section 4, PD 1566, s. of 1978)

10. LGU Disaster Preparedness.

10.1 Existence and ease of mobilizing the Local Disaster Coordinating Council and Disaster Action Team(s).YesNo

10.2 Availability of evacuation center(s).YesNo

10.3 Availability of appropriate equipage, including the adequacy thereof.YesNo

10.4 Availability and ease of distribution relief of goods.YesNo

10.5 Ease of mobilizing medical and counseling services.YesNo

10.6 Availability of an operational community-based disaster early warning system.YesNo

10.7 Ease in realigning the budget for the purchase of supplies and materials or the payment of services which areexceptionally urgent or absolutely indispensable to prevent imminent danger to, or loss of, life or property, in the event

Social Governance: p-11

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

the 5\% Calamity Fund is exhausted.YesNo

10.8 Quality of the Disaster Risk Management Plan.YesNo

Notes:10.1 This factor presumes that beyond organizing, the members of the LDCC and Action Team(s) have undergonedisaster preparedness-related seminars or training.

10.2 It is desired that the evacuation center(s) is (are) pre-designated instead of such being designated only duringthe occurrence of a disaster or a calamity, and made known to vulnerable groups in the community.

10.3 It is presumed that equipment appropriate for a type of disaster are readily available and personnel assigned touse such equipment are trained.

10.4 This means stock piling of basic necessities such as food, medical supplies, blankets, etc., or at the minimumaccess to such relief goods is immediate, and that there is a distribution scheme to effectively reach out todisaster-affected groups.

10.5 This presumes that appropriate medical personnel, including equipment and supplies are readily available formobilization.

10.6 This factor calls for a reliable early warning system, and manned especially so when the situation demands forit.

10.7 In the event the 5\% Calamity Fund is exhausted, ease in realigning the budget for the purchase of suppliesand materials or the payment of services which are exceptionally urgent or absolutely indispensable to preventimminent danger to, or loss of, life or property is desired.

10.8 It is presumed that the plan, at the minimum, contains information: (a) on risk areas based from hazard maps,e.g., storm surge hazard map, flood/ flashflood hazard map, and rain-induced landslide susceptibility map, (b) onvulnerable groups, (c) on strategies in mitigation, response and rehabilitation.

It is assumed that the risk areas, which are embodied in the Disaster Risk Management Plan, are derived from the Comprehensive Land Use Plan or Provincial Development and Physical Framework Plan, with the latter havingbeen enacted through an ordinance.

11. On adequacy of services to disaster victims. Has there been a disaster or calamity occurred in your localityduring this profile year?

Yes No if yes, determine the adequacy of services provided for disaster victims using the criteria below:11.1 sufficient evacuation centers for all the victims

YesNo

11.2 sufficient relief goods and services for all the victims

Social Governance: p-12

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

YesNo

11.3 sufficient first aid and medical servicesYesNo

12. On rehabilitation effort. Has there been a disaster or calamity occurred in your locality during this profileyear?

Yes No If yes, the LGU was able to:12.1 determine the nature and extent of rehabilitation effort to be undertaken

YesNo

12.2 rehabilitate disaster or calamity damagesYesPartialNo

Notes:1. “Partial” means not all were rehabilitated.

Social Governance: p-13

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

Performance Area: Economic Governance Service Area: Support to Agriculture Sector

Instruction:

1. On support to agriculture. Determine the level of support to agriculture using the criteria below.

On infrastructure support:1.1 Rehabilitation or construction of irrigation system for irrigated or irrigable areas.

FullHighLowNoneNA

1.2 Provision of post-harvest equipment, machines or facilities, i.e. threshers, harvesters, driers milling machines,storage, etc.

FullHighLowNoneNA

1.3 Rehabilitation or construction of feeder roads or farm-to-market roads.FullHighLowNoneNA

On local government agricultural extension and on-site research services or facilities:1.4 Credit facilitation services (non-collateralized loans to poor farmers, i.e. loan access, insurance and creditguarantees through cooperatives or other financing institutions.

FullHighLowNone

1.5 Production support services, i.e. planting materials, fertilizers and other soil ameliorants, or laboratory services suchas soil testing and similar services.

FullHighLowNone

1.6 Research and development services, i.e. assistance to research projects, and techno demo cooperators.FullHighLowNone

1.7 Market development services, i.e., trade fairs, exhibits, missions and congresses.FullHigh

Economic Governance: p-1

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

LowNone

Notes:1. Answer “Full” if the support is fully provided and funded by the LGU.2. Answer “High” if the support is provided and funded by the LGU, Provincial Government, Department ofAgriculture, farmers, and/or other donor agencies through a cost-sharing scheme.3. Answer “Low” if the LGU only plays a coordinative function of the Department of Agriculture, and/or otherdonor agencies, and that there are no funds provided by the LGU.4. Answer “None” if there is a need or demand for such service or agricultural support but is not provided by theLGU due to financial or technical constraints.5. NA if the rehabilitation or construction of infrastructure support is not applicable, e.g., agricultural land is not anirrigable land in the case of the provision of irrigation system, or not yet needed since there is already a completeand functional infrastructure support.

2. On the extent of farming household-beneficiaries. Determine the extent of farming households benefiting fromagricultural extension and on-site research services or facilities, in %.

80% or more 50 - 79% Below 50%Notes:1. To compute, (number of farming households availing of agricultural extension and on-site research services orfacilities ÷ total number of farming households) x 100.

3. On alternative and innovative assistance to farmers. Does your LGU have an alternative or innovativeassistance to farmers? (bonus point)

Yes No If yes, give the title of the said program or project.

Program/Project Title:

Performance Area: Economic Governance Service Area: Support to Fishery Services

Instruction:

1. On FARMC functionality. Is the Fisheries and Aquatic Resource Management Council (FARMC) organized?

Yes No If Yes, determine the functionality of FARMC based on composition, meetings, and performance.On composition:1.1 Is the FARMC composition in accordance with Section 75 of Republic Act No. 8550?

YesPartialNo

On meetings:1.2 Does the FARMC meet as often as necessary?

Economic Governance: p-2

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

YesNo

1.3 Is there an organized agenda for every meeting?YesPartialNo

1.4 Is every meeting documented?YesPartialNo

On performance:1.5 Is the FARMC able to assist in the preparation of the Fishery Development Plan?

YesNo

1.6 Is the FARMC able to cause the enactment of a fishery ordinance?YesNo

1.7 Is the FARMC able to assist in the enforcement of fishery laws, rules and regulations on municipal waters?YesPartialNo

Notes:1. FARMC composition: (a) Municipal/City Planning Development Officer; (b) Chairperson, Agriculture/FisheryCommittee of the Sangguniang Bayan/Panlungsod; (c) representative of the Municipal/City Development Council;(d) representative from the accredited non-government organization; (e) representative from the private sector; (f)representative from the Department of Agriculture; and (g) at least eleven (11) fisherfolk representatives (seven (7)municipal fisherfolk, one (1) fishworker and three (3) commercial fishers) in each municipality/city which includerepresentative from youth and women sector.2. "Partial" means yes but not all.

2. On support to fisherfolks and fishery. Determine the level of support to fisherfolks and fishery using thecriteria below.

On infrastructure support:2.1 Rehabilitation or construction of fishery related infrastructure, i.e. mariculture parks, fish ports, seaweeds villageecozones, sea cages, among others.

FullHighLowNoneNA

On local government extension and on-site research services or facilities:2.2 Credit facilitation services (non-collateralized loans to poor fisherfolks, i.e. loan access, insurance and creditguarantees, through cooperative

FullHighLow

Economic Governance: p-3

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

None2.3 Production support services, i.e., fingerlings

FullHighLowNone

2.4 Research and development services, i.e., assistance to research projects, and techno demo cooperators.FullHighLowNone

2.5 Market development services, i.e., trade fairs, exhibits, missions and congresses.FullHighLowNone

Notes:1. Answer “Full” if the support is fully provided and funded by the LGU.2. Answer “High” if the support is provided and funded by the LGU, Provincial Government, Department ofAgriculture, fisherfolks, and/or other donor agencies through a cost-sharing scheme.3. Answer “Low” if the LGU only plays a coordinative function of the Department of Agriculture, and/or otherdonor agencies, and that there are no funds provided by the LGU.4. Answer “None” if there is a need or demand for such service or support but is not provided by the LGU due tofinancial or technical constraints.5. NA if the rehabilitation or construction of infrastructure support not yet needed since there is already a completeand functional infrastructure support.

3. On the extent of fishing household-beneficiaries. Determine the extent of fishing households benefiting fromfishery extension and on-site research or facilities, in %.

80% or more 50 - 79 % Below 50%Notes:1. To compute, (number of fishing households availing of fishery extension and on-site research services orfacilities ÷ total number of fishing households) x 100.

4. On alternative and innovative assistance to fisherfolks. Does your LGU have an alternative or innovativeassistance to fisherfolks? (Bonus point)

Yes No If yes, give the title of the said program or project.

Program/Project Title:

Performance Area: Economic Governance

Economic Governance: p-4

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

Service Area: Entrepreneurship, Business and Industry Promotion

Instruction:

1. On Promoting a Business-Friendly Environment Determine the quality of the civil application system of the LGU to the business sector using the followingcriteria:

1.1 Permitting procedureComputerizedComputer-AidedManual

1.2 Procedure in securing permits is made known to clients (either through website, posters or other means.)YesNo

1.3 Procedure is clear (i.e., step or steps, processing time, processing fee, transaction hour, etc.)YesNo

1.4 Processing of a Building Permit requires, at most, 5 documentary requirements, 5 steps, and 5 signatoriesYesNo

1.5 Processing of an Occupancy Permit requires, at most, 3 documentary requirements, 2 steps, and 5 signatoriesYesNo

1.6 Processing of a Business Permit requires, at most, 6 documentary requirements, 6 steps, and 5 signatories.YesNo

1.7 Has a One-Stop-Shop in the processing of permitsYesNo

1.8 Has a Customer Assistance Desk that attends to inquiries or complaints of business- clientelesYesNo

Notes:1. Reference: Anti-Red Tape Act of 2007 and DILG Memorandum Circular Nos. 2004-50 and 2004-65.

2. On the Promotion of Businesses, Enterprises and IndustriesDetermine the processing time of a building permit, an occupancy permit, and a business permit.

2.1 Building PermitLess than 4 hours4 – 8 hoursMore than 8 hours

2.2 Occupancy PermitLess than 4 hours4 – 8 hoursMore than 8 hours

2.3 Business PermitLess than 15 minutes

Economic Governance: p-5

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

15 – 30 mins.More than 30 minutes

3. Is there a local government-supported administrative body that is responsible in the promotion of business andindustry in the LGU?

Yes No

4. Determine the quality of direct support services to businesses, enterprises and industries, using the criteriabelow:

4.1 Provision of tax incentiveYesNo

4.2 Assistance in product labeling especially for small and medium enterprisesYesNo

4.3 Assists in product packaging especially for small and medium enterprisesYesNo

4.4 Training of business-employed personnel or private sector employeesYesNo

4.5 Maintenance of industrial peaceYesNo

4.6 Support to job fairsYesNo

Economic Governance: p-6

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

Performance Area: Environmental Governance Service Area: Forest Ecosystems Management

Instruction:

1. Is the Forest Management program integrated in the Comprehensive Development Plan or in the ProvincialDevelopment Physical Framework Plan?

Yes No

2. Are NGOs, Peoples’ organizations, the private sector or the general public involved in the protection andmanagement of forest?

Yes No

3. Determine the adequacy of forest management efforts using the following criteria

3.1 Efforts are deliberate - initiated and carefully planned by the LGUYesNo

3.2 Area-targets are setYesNo

3.3 Area-targets are reforestedYesNo

3.4 Area-targets are protectedYesNo

Performance Area: Environmental Governance Service Area: Freshwater Ecosystems Management

Instruction:

1. Is the freshwater protection or rehabilitation program integrated in the Comprehensive Development Plan orProvincial Development Physical Framework Plan?

Yes No

2. Are non-government organizations, people’s organizations, the private sector or the general public involved inthe protection or rehabilitation of freshwater, i.e. river or lake?

Yes No

3. Determine the adequacy of freshwater ecosystem management efforts using the following criteria

3.1 Efforts are deliberate - initiated and carefully planned by the LGUYesNo

Environmental Governance : p-1

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

3.2 Area-targets are setYesNo

3.3 Area-targets are rehabilitatedYesNo

3.4 Area-targets are protectedYesNo

Performance Area: Environmental Governance Service Area: Coastal Marine Ecosystems Management

Instruction:

1. Is the coastal marine resource rehabilitation or protection program integrated in the ComprehensiveDevelopment Plan or Provincial Development Physical Framework Plan?

Yes No

2. Are non-government organizations, people’s organizations, the private sector or the general public involved inthe protection or rehabilitation of coastal areas?

Yes No

3. Determine the adequacy of coastal marine ecosystem management efforts using the following criteria

3.1 Efforts are deliberate - initiated and carefully planned by the LGUYesNo

3.2 Area-targets are setYesNo

3.3 Area-targets are rehabilitatedYesNo

3.4 Area-targets are protectedYesNo

Performance Area: Environmental Governance Service Area: Urban Ecosystems Management

Instruction:

1. Is the pollution control program integrated in the Comprehensive Development Plan or ProvincialDevelopment Physical Framework Plan?

Yes No

Environmental Governance : p-2

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

2. Are non-government organizations, people’s organizations, the private sector or the general public involved inthe protection of the environment from air or water pollution ecosystem?

Yes NoNotes:1. This mean participation in urban space greening - tree parks, greenbelts, and in calling the attention of localauthorities on signs of pollution, pollutants or polluting entities.

3. Determine the adequacy of efforts to enforce pollution control measures using the criteria below:

3.1 Efforts are deliberate - initiated and carefully planned by the LGUYesNo

3.2 Area-targets are setYesNo

3.3 Area-targets are protected from pollutionYesNo

4. On Solid Waste ManagementOn SWMB Functionality. Is the Solid Waste Management Board (SWMB) organized?

Yes No If Yes, determine the functionality of SWMB based on composition, meetings, and performance.On composition:4.1 Is the SWMB composition in accordance with Sections 11 and 12 of Republic Act No. 9003?

YesPartialNo

On meetings:4.2 Does the SWMB meet as often as necessary?

YesNo

4.3 Is there an oranized agenda for every meeting?YesPartialNo

4.4 Is every meeting documented?YesPartialNo

4.5 On performance:GoodSomewhat GoodPoor

Notes:1. SWMB composition: The Provincial or City or Municipal Solid Waste Management Board shall be composed of

Environmental Governance : p-3

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

the Governor or City or Municipal Mayor, as the case maybe, as Head with the following as members: a) One (1)representative of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan or Sangguniang Panlungsod or the Sangguniang Bayan, preferablychairpersons of either the Committees on Environment or Health, who will be designated by the presiding officer; b)President of the Association of Barangay Councils in the municipality or city; c) Chairperson of the SangguniangKabataan Federation; d) A Representative from NGOs whose principal purpose is to promote recycling and theprotection of air and water quality; e) A Representative from the recycling industry; f) A Representative from themanufacturing or packaging industry; and g) A Representative of each concerned government agency possessingrelevant technical and marketing expertise as may be determined by the Board.2. Partial means Yes but not all.3. On performance: Answer “Good” if all the following functions are performed: (a) formulate a 10-year SWMPlan and approved by the National Solid Waste Management Commission; (b) develop specific mechanics andguidelines for the implementation of the SWM Plan; (c) coordinate the efforts of its component barangay in theimplementation of the SWM Plan; (d) recommend measures and safeguards against pollution and for thepreservation of the natural ecosystem; (e) adopt measures to promote and ensure the viability and effectiveimplementation of SWM Programs in component barangays; (f) review the SWM Plan for purposes of ensuring itssustainability, viability, effectiveness and relevance in relation to local and international developments in the fieldof solid waste management; (g) adopt specific revenue generating measures to promote the viability of the SWMPlan; (h) recommend to local authorities measures for franchise or BOT agreements with recognized institutions, toprovide either exclusive or non-exclusive authority for the collection, transfer, storage, processing, recycling ordisposal of solid waste; (i) monitor the implementation of the SWM Plan in cooperation with the private sector andNGOs. Answer “Somewhat Good” if any of those functions is not performed. Answer “Poor” if none of thosefunctions is performed.

5. Does your LGU have a Solid Waste Management Plan?

Yes No If Yes, determine the quality of the Plan using the following criteria:5.1 Participatory in its formulation

YesPartialNo

5.2 Waste characterization, source reduction, collection and transfer, source reduction, recycling, composting,collection and transfer, solid waste disposal, education and public information, and incentive scheme are integralcomponents of the Plan

YesPartialNo

5.3 Financing is an integral component of the PlanYesNo

5.4 M&E is an integral component of the PlanYesNo

5.5 Updated every 2 yearsYesNo

Environmental Governance : p-4

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

Notes:If Yes, determine the quality of the Plan using the following criteria:

6. Determine the percentage of barangays with material recovery facilities.

All or 100% 75% - 99% 50% - 74% 25% - 49% 0 - 25%

7. On Solid Waste Collection and Disposal. Determine the effectiveness of solid waste collection and disposal usingthe following criteria:Is solid waste collection done on time or as scheduled?

All the time Most of the time Sometime Never on time No collection

8. Which of these facilities is/are the final disposal of solid wastes?

Sanitary Landfill Sanitary Landfill and Controlled Dumpsite Controlled Dumpsite Controlled Dumpsite and Open Dumpsite Open Dumpsite

Environmental Governance : p-5

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

Performance Area: Valuing Fundamentals of Governance Service Area: Participation

Instruction:

1. Are the NGOs, People’s Organizations and/or Private Sector represented in the following Local Special Bodies?

1.1 Local Development CouncilYesPartialNo

1.2 Local Health BoardYesNo

1.3 Local School BoardYesPartialNo

1.4. Peace and Order CouncilYesPartialNo

Notes:1. The LDC composition shall include representatives of NGOs operating in the province, city or municipality,which shall not be less than one-fourth (1/4) of the members of the fully organized council (Sec. 107, LGC). Answer “Yes” if the expected number of NGO representation is met; “Partial” if there is an NGO representationbut did not meet the required number of NGOs; or “No” if there is no NGO representation in the LDC.

2. The LHB composition shall include representatives of a private sector or NGO involved in health services (Sec.102, LGC) . Answer “Yes” if there is a private sector or NGO representation, or “No” if there is none.

3. The LSB composition shall include: (1) duly elected president of the provincial, city or municipal federation ofparents-teachers associations, (2) duly elected representative of the teachers' organizations in the province, city ormunicipality, and (3) duly elected representative of the non-academic personnel of public schools in the province,city or municipality (Sec. 98, LGC). Answer “Yes” if the three sectors or organizations are represented; “Partial”if at least one of the sector or organization is represented; or “No” if none of the three mentioned above isrepresented in the LSB.

4. The POC composition shall include three (3) representatives from the private sector – (Executive Order No.773 s. 2009). Answer “Yes” if POC has three representatives from the private sector, “Partial” if POC has one ortwo representatives from the private sector, or “No” if the POC has no representation from the private sector.

2. Was your LGU able to set up a feedback mechanism to generate citizens’ views on the reach and quality ofyour LGU’s services?

Yes NoNotes:

Valuing Fundamentals of Governance: p-1

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

1. Generating citizens’ feedbacks can be done through the installation of suggestion boxes located strategicallywithin the provincial capitol, the city or municipal hall, or through the conduct of Citizens’ Satisfaction Survey,either through website, house-to-house or key informants’ surveys or assemblies.

3. Are NGOs, POs or the Private Sector involved in the implementation of LGU development projects (especiallythose that are funded out of the 20% component of IRA)?

Yes No If yes, what was the extent of involvement of NGOs, POs or the private sector?

More than 70% of the LGU development projects were implemented in partnership with NGOs, POs and the privatesector

50 - 70% of the LGU development projects were implemented in partnership with NGOs, POs and the private sectorBelow 50% of the LGU development projects were implemented in partnership with NGOs, POs and the private

sectorNotes:1. To determine your answer, get the number of local government projects implemented in partnership withnon-governmental organizations, people’s organizations or private sector, whether in the planning, actualimplementation, monitoring, or evaluation stage of such projects, divide with the total number of local governmentprojects especially those funded out of the 20\% component of the Internal Revenue Allotment, then multiply by100.

Performance Area: Valuing Fundamentals of Governance Service Area: Transparency

Instruction:

1. Is a Public Information Office or Desk present in your LGU?

Yes NoNotes:1. A Public Information Office or Desk should be able to provide immediate action, such as referrals, or basicinformation in response to requests or inquiries of LGU clients (whether walk-in or through other means ofcommunication). If this condition is not met, answer “No”.

2. Was your LGU able to communicate to the public updated information about your LGU’s services, plans,programs and special events through?

2.1 assemblies or other forumsYesPartialNo

2.2 bulletin board or performance billboardYesPartialNo

2.3 newsletter, flyer or brochureYesPartial

Valuing Fundamentals of Governance: p-2

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

No2.4 website

YesPartialNo

2.5 broadcast mediaYesPartialNo

Notes:1. Yes, if all updated information about: (1) local government plans such as Public Safety Plan, CLUP, Health Plan,Development Plan and AIP, among others; (2) local government programs which include training or capacitybuilding, resource generation program, traffic control program, employment assistance program, and day-careservices, among others; and (3) special events such as trade fairs, investment promotion and sportsfests, amongothers, are communicated to the public through the specified medium.2. Partial, if not all updated information about local government plans, programs and special events arecommunicated to the public through the specified medium.3. No, if no information about local government plans, programs and special events are communicated to the publicthrough the specified medium.

3. Are public documents such as transaction records and contracts, as appropriate, accessible to the public?

Yes No

Performance Area: Valuing Fundamentals of Governance Service Area: Financial Accountability

Instruction:

1. Determine the effectiveness of your LGU’s Financial Management System, using the following criteria:

1.1 Relevant management tools such as manuals or guidelines are available.YesNo

1.2 Disbursements are made only for approved purposesYesNo

1.3 Accounting records are supported by source documentation such as canceled checks, paid bills, payrolls, contracts,subcontracts and other financial transaction documents

YesPartialNo

1.4 Accountable financial officers are known and their responsibilities are clear.YesPartialNo

1.5 Sanctions for erring local government personnel regarding financial transactions are clear and enforcedYes

Valuing Fundamentals of Governance: p-3

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

PartialNo

1.6 Information about the procedure in transacting financially with the local government is available via various mediasuch as billboards, posters, bulletin boards, flyers, regular newsletters, Internet or publications of the local government

YesPartialNo

1.7 Monthly financial reports are availableYesPartialNo

1.8 Annual financial statements are certifiedYesNo

1.9 Annual financial statements are submitted within 60 days after the 31st of DecemberYesPartialNo

1.10 Summary of Income and Expenditures is posted in at least three (3) conspicuous places in the local governmentunit within 30 days from year-end

YesPartialNo

1.11 Annual Financial statements are made available upon requestYesPartialNo

1.12 Financial statements are published in the local mediaYesNo

1.13 Financial management information system is automatedYesNo

Notes:1. Partial means yes but not to all 2. Certified financial statements have undergone the process of review,auditing and certification by COA. 3. Guided by Section 346, LGC of 1991 4. Guided by Section 352, LGC of1991

2. Determine the functionality of the Bids and Awards Committee, using the following criteria:

2.1 The composition of the Bids and Awards Committee is in accordance with Section 11 of Republic Act No. 9184, orGovernment Procurement Reform Act

YesNo

2.2 Procurement rules and procedure are enforced, e.g., preparation of bidding documents, posting of invitation to bid,conduct of pre-procurement and pre-bid conference, and determination of the eligibility of prospective bidders

YesPartial

Valuing Fundamentals of Governance: p-4

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

No2.3 All Bids and Awards Committee meetings are held at the provincial capitol, or city or municipal hall

YesNo

2.4 Proceedings of the meetings are documentedYesPartialNo

2.5 Minutes of the meetings are made available upon requestYesPartialNo

Notes:1. The BAC shall have 5 but not more than 7 members. The BAC shall be composed of one (1)representative each from the regular offices under the Office of the Local Chief Executive such as, but not limitedto the following: Office of the Administrator, Budget Office, Legal Office, Engineering Office, General ServicesOffices. The Chairman of the BAC shall be at least a third ranking permanent official of the procuring entity. Themembers of the BAC shall be personnel occupying plantilla positions of the procuring entity concerned. The localchief executive shall designate the members of the BAC. The members shall elect among themselves who shall actas the Chairman and Vice-Chairman. (IRR of R.A. No. 9184) 2. Partial means Yes but not to all.

3. Are cash advances liquidated within the prescribed period?

3.1 Salaries and wages are liquidated within 5 days after each 15 day or end of the month pay period.All the timeMost of the timeSeldom

3.2 Petty operating expenses and field operating expenses are liquidated within 20 days after the end of the year subjectto replenishment as frequently as necessary during the year.

YesNoNA

3.3 Official travels are liquidated within 60 days after return to the Philippines (for foreign travel) or 30 days uponreturn to permanent official station (for local travel).

All the timeMost of the timeSeldom

Notes:Liquidation of cash advances is guided by Commission on Audit (COA) Circular No. 97-002

4. Has your LGU received a COA audit report?

Yes No If yes, is the Status Report of the actions taken by the LGU on the COA audit findings and recommendations available?

YesNoNo negative findings and recommendation were issued by COA

Valuing Fundamentals of Governance: p-5

Page 1

LEGEND: - Very High - Low - High - Very Low - Medium

Rating SA Average Rating

Input Over-all Rating

5.00Representation of NGOs, POs and Private Sector in the Local Special Bodies 5 5.00

Presence of feedback mechanism to generate citizens’ views on the reach and quality of LGU services 5

Presence of a Public Information Office or Desk 5 5.00Extent of communication medium used to update the public on local government plans, programs and special events

5

Effectiveness of the LGU's Financial Management System5

Functionality of the Bids and Awards Committee 5 5.00

Timely liquidation of cash advances5

4.92Quality of Legislative Agenda 5 5.00Quality of the Legislative Tracking System 5Functionality of the Local Development Council 5Quality of database to support local development planning 5 5.00Presence of Executive and Legislative Agenda [ELA] 5Efficiency of the system on local government-imposed or collected taxes, fees and charges 5

Quality of the Comprehensive Revenue Generation Plan 5 5.00Total Revenue Collection Cost to Total Revenue Collected [Cost Collection Ratio] 5

Quality of the Annual Budget 5Per Capita Expenditure 4 4.50Personal Service Ratio 4Debt service ratio 5Quality of customer service in the processing of civil registry documents 5

Quality of customer service in the processing of RPT documents 5 5.00

Streamlined civil application processes 5Quality of Human Resource Management and Development Program 5 5.00

Effectiveness of human resource recruitment, evaluation, promotion and grievance systems 5

4.86Functionality of the Local Health Board 5Quality of primary health care 5Quality of maternal care 5

My LGU State of Performance (Structures, Policies, Guidelines, Administrative Systems, Managerial & Technical

Competencies, Tools, Facilities, Equipment and Financial Resources)

FUNDAMENTALS OF GOVERNANCE

Local Legislation

Participation

Health Services

Resource Allocation & Utilization

Transparency

Financial Accountability

SOCIAL GOVERNANCE

ADMINISTRATIVE GOVERNANCE

Development Planning

Revenue Generation

Customer Service

Human Resources

Page 2

LEGEND: - Very High - Low - High - Very Low - Medium

Rating SA Average Rating

Input Over-all Rating

My LGU State of Performance (Structures, Policies, Guidelines, Administrative Systems, Managerial & Technical

Competencies, Tools, Facilities, Equipment and Financial Resources)Quality of child care 5 4.57Other innovative health services 5Percentage of barangays with functioning barangay health centers or stations 5

Ratio of public health workers to population 2Functionality of the Local School Board 5Support to elementary & secondary education from SEF 5Support to education from General Fund 5Quality of Alternative Learning System 5 5.00Percentage of barangays with functioning pre-school centers 5

Effectiveness of the Local Housing Board and Housing Task Force or coordinating unit for Housing 5

Presence of database for the housing sector 5 5.00Types of services for the housing sector 5Quality of the Socialized Housing Program 5Functionality of the Local Peace and Order Council 5Functionality of the Local DRRMC 5Quality of Women's and Children's Protection Program 5Provision of sites for protective services 5 4.88Functionality of the Local Council for the Protection of Children 5

Adequacy of financial support to Lupong Tagapamayapa 4

Percentage of barangays with organized barangay tanods 5Percentage of barangays with organized Lupong Tagapamayapa 5

4.76Extent of local government support to sustainable agriculture 4.14Presence of other alternative or innovative assistance to farmers 5 4.71Quality of local government agricultural extension and on-site research services or facilities 5Functionality of the Fisheries and Aquatic Resource Management Council [FARMC] 4.71Support to fisherfolks and fishing industry

4 4.57Presence of other alternative or innovative assistance to fisherfolks

5Quality of Civil Application System to Business Sector

5

Presence of a local government-supported administrative body that is responsible in the promotion of business and industry

5 5

Support to Education Services

Entrepreneurship, Business and Industry Promotion

Support to Housing and Basic Utilities

Peace, Security & Disaster Risk Management

ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE

Support to Agriculture Sector

Support to Fishery Services

Health Services

Page 3

LEGEND: - Very High - Low - High - Very Low - Medium

Rating SA Average Rating

Input Over-all Rating

My LGU State of Performance (Structures, Policies, Guidelines, Administrative Systems, Managerial & Technical

Competencies, Tools, Facilities, Equipment and Financial Resources)Presence of basic infrastructure and facilities in areas zoned for business and industry 5

Quality of the Local Investment and Incentive Code 55.00

Integration of forest management program in the CLUP or PDPFP 5 5.00Involvement of NGOs, POs and Private Sector in the protection and management of forest 5Integration of freshwater protection or rehabilitation program in the CLUP or PDPFP 5 5.00Involvement of NGOs, POs and Private Sector or general public in the protection and rehabilitation of freshwater i.e. river or lake 5Integration of coastal marine resource rehabilitation or protection program in the CLUP or PDPFP 5 5.00

Involvement of NGOs, POs and Private Sector or general public in the protection and rehabilitation of coastal marine ecosystem

5

Conservation and Rehabilitation of Mangroves 5Integration of pollution control program in the CLUP or PDPFP 5

Involvement of NGOs, POs and Private Sector or general public in the protectionof the environment from air or water pollution

5 5.00

Functionality of the Solid Waste Management Board 5Presence of Solid Waste Management Plan 5Presence of facilities as final disposal of solid wastes 5

OVERALL PERFORMANCE INDEX 4.91

Entrepreneurship, Business and Industry Promotion

Urban Ecosystem Management

ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE

Forest Ecosystem Management

Freshwater Ecosystem Management

Coastal Marine Ecosystem Management

Page 4

LEGEND: - Very High - Low - High - Very Low - Medium

RatingSA

Average Rating

Output Over-all Rating

5.00Involvement of NGOs POs and Private Sevtor in the implementation of LGU development projects

5 5.00

Accessibility of public documents such as transaction records and contracts 5 5.00

Availability of status report on actions taken by LGU on COA Audit Findings and 5 5.00

Presence of certified financial statements 5

4.71Presence of updated codes in support of Administrative Functions, Regulatory Mandates, Corporate Objectives, Social Development, Economic Development and Environmental Management 5

5.00

Percentage of ordinances over total enactments 5Quality of the Comprehensive Development Plan or PDPFP 5

Quality of the Local Development Investment Plan as a component of the CDP or PDPFP 5 5.00

Quality of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan 5Quality of the Gender and Development Plan*** 5Quality of the Annual Investment Program [AIP] 5Revenue Target Accomplishment Rate 4Real Property Tax Accomplishment Rate 4Percentage of locally-sourced revenue to total local goevrnment revenues 4 4.25

Percentage of Regular Revenues to Total Local Government Revenues 5

Percentage of total appropriations expended on personal services 4 4.00

Processing time in the issuance of civil registry documents

5 5.00Processing time in the issuance of a real property document

5Percentage of plantilla staff participating in human resource development activities 5 5.00

Percentage of local government-initiated staff development activities 5

4.06Percentage of women provided with pre-natal care 2 2.50Percentage of fully-immunized children 3Elementary school participation rate 5 5.00Secondary school participation rate 5Percentage of beneficiaries provided with home lots for Socialized Housing 4 4.00

Percentage of houses or dwelling units completed 4

My LGU State of Productivity (Availability and quality of basic services delivered by the Local

Government)GOVERNANCE

SOCIAL GOVERNANCE

Participation

Transparency

Resource Allocation & Utilization

Customer Service

Human Resources

Financial Accountability

Development Planning

Revenue Generation

Local Legislation

ADMINISTRATIVE GOVERNANCE

Health Services

Support to Education Services

Support to Housing and Basic Utilities

Page 5

LEGEND: - Very High - Low - High - Very Low - Medium

RatingSA

Average Rating

Output Over-all Rating

My LGU State of Productivity (Availability and quality of basic services delivered by the Local

Government)Quality of the Integrated Area Community Public Safety Plan [I/ACPSP] 5

Quality of Accomplishments 5 4.75Percentage of interpersonal disputes resolved through the Lupong Tagapamayapa 5

Percentage of amicable settlements sustained under the Lupong Tagapamayapa 3

Quality of Disaster Risk Management Plan 5Responsiveness of disaster operations 5Adequacy of services for disaster victims 5Rehabilitation effort 5

9/23/2014jd

4.11Percentage of farmers who are members of cooperatives or other collective organizations 4

Percentage of farming households benefiting from agricultural extension and on-site research services or facilities

4 4.33

Percentage of barangays connected to town or city center by farm-to-market roads 5

Percentage of fisherfolks who are members of cooperatives or other collective organizations 2 3.00

Percentage of fishing households benefiting from fishery extension and on-site research services or facilities

4

Processing time of Building Permit, Occupancy Permit & Business Permit 5 5.00

Quality of direct support services to businesses, enterprises and industries 5

Percentage of new enterprise, business and industry registered

54.83

Adequacy of forest management efforts 5 5.00Adequacy of freshwater ecosystem management efforts 5 5.00Adequacy of coastal marine ecosystem management efforts 5 5.00

Adequacy of effort to enforce pollution control measures

5Percentage of Barangays with Material Recovery Facilities

5 4.33Effectiveness of solid waste collection and disposal

3

4.54OVERALL PRODUCTIVITY INDEX

Urban Ecosystem Management

ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE

Freshwater Ecosystem Management

Coastal Marine Ecosystem Management

Support to Agriculture Sector

Support to Fishery Services

Forest Ecosytem Management

Peace, Security & Disaster Risk Management

ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE

Page 1

LEGEND: - Very High - Low - High - Very Low - Medium

Rating SA Average Rating

Input Over-all Rating

5.00Representation of NGOs, POs and Private Sector in the Local Special Bodies 5 5.00

Presence of feedback mechanism to generate citizens’ views on the reach and quality of LGU services 5

Presence of a Public Information Office or Desk 5 5.00Extent of communication medium used to update the public on local government plans, programs and special events

5

Effectiveness of the LGU's Financial Management System5

Functionality of the Bids and Awards Committee 5 5.00

Timely liquidation of cash advances5

4.92Quality of Legislative Agenda 5 5.00Quality of the Legislative Tracking System 5Functionality of the Local Development Council 5Quality of database to support local development planning 5 5.00Presence of Executive and Legislative Agenda [ELA] 5Efficiency of the system on local government-imposed or collected taxes, fees and charges 5

Quality of the Comprehensive Revenue Generation Plan 5 5.00Total Revenue Collection Cost to Total Revenue Collected [Cost Collection Ratio] 5

Quality of the Annual Budget 5Per Capita Expenditure 4 4.50Personal Service Ratio 4Debt service ratio 5Quality of customer service in the processing of civil registry documents 5

Quality of customer service in the processing of RPT documents 5 5.00

Streamlined civil application processes 5Quality of Human Resource Management and Development Program 5 5.00

Effectiveness of human resource recruitment, evaluation, promotion and grievance systems 5

4.86Functionality of the Local Health Board 5Quality of primary health care 5Quality of maternal care 5

My LGU State of Performance (Structures, Policies, Guidelines, Administrative Systems, Managerial & Technical

Competencies, Tools, Facilities, Equipment and Financial Resources)

FUNDAMENTALS OF GOVERNANCE

Local Legislation

Participation

Health Services

Resource Allocation & Utilization

Transparency

Financial Accountability

SOCIAL GOVERNANCE

ADMINISTRATIVE GOVERNANCE

Development Planning

Revenue Generation

Customer Service

Human Resources

Page 2

LEGEND: - Very High - Low - High - Very Low - Medium

Rating SA Average Rating

Input Over-all Rating

My LGU State of Performance (Structures, Policies, Guidelines, Administrative Systems, Managerial & Technical

Competencies, Tools, Facilities, Equipment and Financial Resources)Quality of child care 5 4.57Other innovative health services 5Percentage of barangays with functioning barangay health centers or stations 5

Ratio of public health workers to population 2Functionality of the Local School Board 5Support to elementary & secondary education from SEF 5Support to education from General Fund 5Quality of Alternative Learning System 5 5.00Percentage of barangays with functioning pre-school centers 5

Effectiveness of the Local Housing Board and Housing Task Force or coordinating unit for Housing 5

Presence of database for the housing sector 5 5.00Types of services for the housing sector 5Quality of the Socialized Housing Program 5Functionality of the Local Peace and Order Council 5Functionality of the Local DRRMC 5Quality of Women's and Children's Protection Program 5Provision of sites for protective services 5 4.88Functionality of the Local Council for the Protection of Children 5

Adequacy of financial support to Lupong Tagapamayapa 4

Percentage of barangays with organized barangay tanods 5Percentage of barangays with organized Lupong Tagapamayapa 5

4.76Extent of local government support to sustainable agriculture 4.14Presence of other alternative or innovative assistance to farmers 5 4.71Quality of local government agricultural extension and on-site research services or facilities 5Functionality of the Fisheries and Aquatic Resource Management Council [FARMC] 4.71Support to fisherfolks and fishing industry

4 4.57Presence of other alternative or innovative assistance to fisherfolks

5Quality of Civil Application System to Business Sector

5

Presence of a local government-supported administrative body that is responsible in the promotion of business and industry

5 5

Support to Education Services

Entrepreneurship, Business and Industry Promotion

Support to Housing and Basic Utilities

Peace, Security & Disaster Risk Management

ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE

Support to Agriculture Sector

Support to Fishery Services

Health Services

Page 3

LEGEND: - Very High - Low - High - Very Low - Medium

Rating SA Average Rating

Input Over-all Rating

My LGU State of Performance (Structures, Policies, Guidelines, Administrative Systems, Managerial & Technical

Competencies, Tools, Facilities, Equipment and Financial Resources)Presence of basic infrastructure and facilities in areas zoned for business and industry 5

Quality of the Local Investment and Incentive Code 55.00

Integration of forest management program in the CLUP or PDPFP 5 5.00Involvement of NGOs, POs and Private Sector in the protection and management of forest 5Integration of freshwater protection or rehabilitation program in the CLUP or PDPFP 5 5.00Involvement of NGOs, POs and Private Sector or general public in the protection and rehabilitation of freshwater i.e. river or lake 5Integration of coastal marine resource rehabilitation or protection program in the CLUP or PDPFP 5 5.00

Involvement of NGOs, POs and Private Sector or general public in the protection and rehabilitation of coastal marine ecosystem

5

Conservation and Rehabilitation of Mangroves 5Integration of pollution control program in the CLUP or PDPFP 5

Involvement of NGOs, POs and Private Sector or general public in the protectionof the environment from air or water pollution

5 5.00

Functionality of the Solid Waste Management Board 5Presence of Solid Waste Management Plan 5Presence of facilities as final disposal of solid wastes 5

OVERALL PERFORMANCE INDEX 4.91

Entrepreneurship, Business and Industry Promotion

Urban Ecosystem Management

ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE

Forest Ecosystem Management

Freshwater Ecosystem Management

Coastal Marine Ecosystem Management

Page 4

LEGEND: - Very High - Low - High - Very Low - Medium

RatingSA

Average Rating

Output Over-all Rating

5.00Involvement of NGOs POs and Private Sevtor in the implementation of LGU development projects

5 5.00

Accessibility of public documents such as transaction records and contracts 5 5.00

Availability of status report on actions taken by LGU on COA Audit Findings and 5 5.00

Presence of certified financial statements 5

4.71Presence of updated codes in support of Administrative Functions, Regulatory Mandates, Corporate Objectives, Social Development, Economic Development and Environmental Management 5

5.00

Percentage of ordinances over total enactments 5Quality of the Comprehensive Development Plan or PDPFP 5

Quality of the Local Development Investment Plan as a component of the CDP or PDPFP 5 5.00

Quality of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan 5Quality of the Gender and Development Plan*** 5Quality of the Annual Investment Program [AIP] 5Revenue Target Accomplishment Rate 4Real Property Tax Accomplishment Rate 4Percentage of locally-sourced revenue to total local goevrnment revenues 4 4.25

Percentage of Regular Revenues to Total Local Government Revenues 5

Percentage of total appropriations expended on personal services 4 4.00

Processing time in the issuance of civil registry documents

5 5.00Processing time in the issuance of a real property document

5Percentage of plantilla staff participating in human resource development activities 5 5.00

Percentage of local government-initiated staff development activities 5

4.06Percentage of women provided with pre-natal care 2 2.50Percentage of fully-immunized children 3Elementary school participation rate 5 5.00Secondary school participation rate 5Percentage of beneficiaries provided with home lots for Socialized Housing 4 4.00

Percentage of houses or dwelling units completed 4

My LGU State of Productivity (Availability and quality of basic services delivered by the Local

Government)GOVERNANCE

SOCIAL GOVERNANCE

Participation

Transparency

Resource Allocation & Utilization

Customer Service

Human Resources

Financial Accountability

Development Planning

Revenue Generation

Local Legislation

ADMINISTRATIVE GOVERNANCE

Health Services

Support to Education Services

Support to Housing and Basic Utilities

Page 5

LEGEND: - Very High - Low - High - Very Low - Medium

RatingSA

Average Rating

Output Over-all Rating

My LGU State of Productivity (Availability and quality of basic services delivered by the Local

Government)Quality of the Integrated Area Community Public Safety Plan [I/ACPSP] 5

Quality of Accomplishments 5 4.75Percentage of interpersonal disputes resolved through the Lupong Tagapamayapa 5

Percentage of amicable settlements sustained under the Lupong Tagapamayapa 3

Quality of Disaster Risk Management Plan 5Responsiveness of disaster operations 5Adequacy of services for disaster victims 5Rehabilitation effort 5

9/23/2014jd

4.11Percentage of farmers who are members of cooperatives or other collective organizations 4

Percentage of farming households benefiting from agricultural extension and on-site research services or facilities

4 4.33

Percentage of barangays connected to town or city center by farm-to-market roads 5

Percentage of fisherfolks who are members of cooperatives or other collective organizations 2 3.00

Percentage of fishing households benefiting from fishery extension and on-site research services or facilities

4

Processing time of Building Permit, Occupancy Permit & Business Permit 5 5.00

Quality of direct support services to businesses, enterprises and industries 5

Percentage of new enterprise, business and industry registered

54.83

Adequacy of forest management efforts 5 5.00Adequacy of freshwater ecosystem management efforts 5 5.00Adequacy of coastal marine ecosystem management efforts 5 5.00

Adequacy of effort to enforce pollution control measures

5Percentage of Barangays with Material Recovery Facilities

5 4.33Effectiveness of solid waste collection and disposal

3

4.54OVERALL PRODUCTIVITY INDEX

Urban Ecosystem Management

ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE

Freshwater Ecosystem Management

Coastal Marine Ecosystem Management

Support to Agriculture Sector

Support to Fishery Services

Forest Ecosytem Management

Peace, Security & Disaster Risk Management

ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

this is the Code of General Ordinances which contains different subjects which are administrative in nature andintent.3. "NA" means not applicable.

4. Determine the percentage (%) of ordinances over legislative measures.

96 - 100 % 91 - 95 % 86 - 90 % 80 - 85 % below 80%

Notes:1. To compute, (Total number of ordinances / Total legislative measures x 100)2. Benchmark: 90\% - Target estimate

Performance Area: Administrative Governance Service Area: Development Planning

Instruction:

1. Is the Local Development Council organized?

Yes No If Yes, determine the functionality of the LDC based on composition, meetings, and performance.On composition:1.1 Is the LDC composition in accordance with the LG Code?

YesPartialNo

1.2 Is the Executive Committee3 organized pursuant to the LG Code? YesPartialNo

1.3 Are Sectoral or Functional Committees organized to assist the LDC?YesNo

On meetings:1.4 Does the LDC meet at least once every six months?

YesNo

1.5 Does the Executive Committee meet as often as necessary? YesNo

1.6 Does the Sectoral or Functional Committees meet as often as necessary?YesNo

1.7 Is there an organized agenda for every meeting?YesPartial

Administrative Governance: p-3

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

No1.8 Is every meeting documented?

YesPartialNo

1.9 Are the decisions embodied through resolutions of the LDC or of the Sectoral or Functional Committees?YesPartialNo

1.10 On performance4:GoodSomewhat GoodPoor

Notes:1. LDC is organized when there is an executive or legislative issuance for that matter.2. LDC composition is based on Sec.107 of LG Code of 1991, as follows: The City Mayor or Municipal Mayor, in the case of City or Municipal Development Council, as Head. All PunongBarangays in the locality; the Chairman of the Committee on Appropriations of the Sanggunian Panlungsod orSangguniang Bayan; the Congressman or His representative; and Representatives of non-governmentalorganizations operating in the city or municipality, as members. NGO representatives shall constitute not less thanone-fourth (1/4) of the members of the fully organized council.

The Governor, in the case of the Provincial Development Council, as Head. All Mayors of component cities andmunicipalities; the Chairman of the Committee on Appropriations of the Sanggunian Panlalawigan; theCongressman or His representative; and Representatives of the non-government organization operating in theprovince, as members. NGO representatives shall constitute not less than one-fourth (1/4) of the members of fullyorganized council.

Or in the case of ARMM, LDC composition is based on Sec. 108 of LG Code of the Autonomous Region inMuslim Mindanao, as follows: The City Mayor or Municipal Mayor, in the case of City or MunicipalDevelopment Council, as Head. The Chairman of the Committee on Appropriations of the Sanggunian Panlungsodor Sangguniang Bayan; the Congressman or His representative; the Assemblymen or their representatives; andRepresentatives of non-governmental organizations operating in the city or municipality, as members. NGOrepresentatives shall constitute not less than one-fourth (1/4) of the members of the fully organized council.

The Governor, in the case of the Provincial Development Council, as Head. All Mayors of component cities andmunicipalities; the Chairman of the Committee on Appropriations of the Sanggunian Panlalawigan; theCongressman or His representative; and Representatives of the non-government organization operating in theprovince, as members. NGO representatives shall constitute not less than one-fourth (1/4) of the members of fullyorganized council.

3.The Executive Committee of the City or Municipal Development Council shall be composed of the City Mayoror Municipal Mayor as Chairman: the Chairman of the Committee on appropriations of the sanggunian panlungsodor bayan; the president of the city or municipality’s League of Barangays; and a representative ofnongovernmental organizations that are represented in the council, as members.

Administrative Governance: p-4

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

The Provincial Development Council Executive Committee shall be composed of the Governor as chairman: theRepresentative of component city and municipal mayors to be chosen form among themselves; the Chairman of theCommittee on Appropriations of the Sanggunian Panlalawigan; the President of the Provincial League ofBarangays; and a Representative of nongovernmental organizations that are represented in the council, as members.

4. LDC Performance is “Good” if the LDC was able to formulate, or update, long-term, medium-term and annualsocio-economic development plans and policies; formulate, or update, medium-term and annual public investmentprograms; appraise and prioritize socio-economic development programs and projects; formulate, or update, localinvestment incentives to promote the inflow and direction of private investment capital; and coordinate, monitorand evaluate the implementation of development programs and projects. LDC Performance is “Somewhat Good” ifat least one of the functions mentioned above is not exercised. LDC Performance is “Poor” if none of the functionsmentioned above is exercised.

2. Does the Planning and Development Coordination Office maintain a database for development planning?

Yes No If Yes, does the database contain updated:2.1 demographic data, e.g. growth rate, population density, etc.

YesPartialNo

2.2 social development data, e.g. data on education, health, housing and basic utilities, peace and order, etc.YesPartialNo

2.3 economic development data, e.g. data on poverty, labor and employment, etc.YesPartialNo

2.4 environmental data, e.g. data on forest, agricultural, coastal marine, freshwater, biodiversity and urban ecosystems,etc.

YesPartialNo

2.5 physical land use dataYesPartialNo

2.6 institutional data whether of the local government or of the non-government sector, e.g. financial data, personnelcompetencies, list of NGOs and their thrusts

YesPartialNo

2.7 Does your LGU use a Geographic Information System (GIS)?YesNo

Administrative Governance: p-5

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

Notes:1. A database is a mass or organized data stored in a computer.2. For question 2.1, answer “Yes” if essential data are complete, and that reports and plans can be done with easesince all the information needed are readily available, “Partial” if some of the data are there but not complete andthat reports and plans can be done with little difficulty since some of the data are not readily available, or “No” ifmost if not all of the data are absent and that reports and plans can be done with utmost difficulty since most of thedata are not readily available.

4. Does your LGU have a Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP)?

Yes No If Yes, Is the CDP formulated in accordance with the following?4.1 Participatory in its formulation

YesPartialNo

4.2 Socio-economic development thrusts are embodied in the PlanYesNo

4.3 Development strategies are embodied in the PlanYesNo

4.4 Local Development Investment Program, which contains the list of programs and projects with correspondingcosts to be funded from internal or external sources, is an integral component of the CDP.

YesNo

4.5 Monitoring and Evaluation is an integral component of the PlanYesNo

4.6 Supportive of overall provincial development thrustsYesNoNA

4.7 Is the CDP updated, at least every six years?YesNo

Notes:1. Partial means that not all concerned stakeholders are consulted.

5. Does your LGU have an approved Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP)?

Yes No If Yes, is the CLUP formulated in accordance with the following?5.1 Participatory in its formulation

YesPartialNo

5.2 Demography, socio-economic, infrastructure and utilities, land use and local administration are integral sectors in

Administrative Governance: p-6

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

the Plan.YesNo

5.3 Consistent with the Provincial Development Physical Framework Plan (for component cities only)YesNoNA

5.4 Monitoring and evaluation is an integral component of the planYesNo

5.5 Is the CLUP updated, every 10 or 15 years?YesNo

Notes:1. Partial means that not all concerned stakeholders are consulted.

6. Does your LGU have an Annual Investment Program (AIP)?

Yes No If Yes, is the AIP prepared in accordance to the following?6.1 Consistent with the Local Development Investment Program

YesNo

6.2 Embodies the following minimum information: projects to be undertaken, for whom (area coverage and targetbeneficiaries), how, by whom, and when

YesNo

6.3 Financing is an integral component of the PlanYesNo

6.4 Monitoring and evaluation is an integral componentYesNo

7. Does your LGU have an Executive and Legislative Agenda (bonus point)?

Yes No

Performance Area: Administrative Governance Service Area: Revenue Generation

Instruction:

1. Determine the efficiency of system (methods or procedures) on LGU-imposed or collected taxes, fees andcharges.

System on all local taxes, fees and charges1.1 Operates on a network that is in interlinked with computers in the Offices of the Assessor, Business Permits andLicensing Officer and the Treasurer

Administrative Governance: p-7

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

YesNo

1.2 Incentive scheme is provided to promote efficiency in real property assessment and real property tax collectionYesNo

1.3 Civil remedies on tax delinquencies are enforcedYesNo

1.4 Information is disseminated on any proposed imposition and on the schedule of market values used for assessment.YesNo

1.5 Guided by a Local Revenue Code, which is not more than 5 years old.YesNo

System on Real Property Tax1.6 Guided by updated real property tax maps for property identification

YesNo

1.7 Real property records and information are indexed to facilitate access, at the very least time possible, by realproperty owners.

YesNo

System on Business Tax1.9 Tax records management, i.e., conduct of business tax mapping, establishment of a revenue data bank, and regularupdating of the list of taxpayers.

YesNo

1.10 Implementation of revenue enhancement measuresYesNo

2. Does your LGU have an Annual Revenue Generation Plan ?

Yes No If Yes, determine the quality of the plan, using the following criteria:2.1 Embodies local revenue policy direction(s) for the given year.

YesNo

2.2. Contains strategies that have to be undertaken in order to yield the amount of revenues estimated to be collected forthe given year.

YesNo

2.3 Identifies local government personnel responsible for each strategy.YesNo

2.4 Includes the amount of revenues projected or estimated to be generated annually from real property taxes, businesstaxes, fees and charges, and from other potential sources such as donations, grants, and share from national wealth.

Yes

Administrative Governance: p-8

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

No2.5 Monitoring and evaluation is an integral component of the Plan

YesNo

2.6 Utilized by local financial generation managers in monitoring accomplishments, lapses and misses in revenuegeneration.

YesNo

2.7 Used as a principal reference document in updating the Revenue Code (answer only if there is a Revenue Code).YesNoNA

Notes:1. Annual Revenue Generation Plan pertains to a plan that is patterned after the Resource Mobilization Manual ofBLGF.

3. Determine the percentage of cost to collect revenues to total locally-sourced revenues.

Cost to collect revenues to total locally-sourced revenues (in %)

Notes:1. Cost to collect revenues include salaries of collection agents, operations (computerization), public addressnotices, and advertisements, among others.2. Locally-sourced revenue is composed of tax and non-tax revenues. Tax revenues are sourced from RealProperty Tax, Business Tax, and other taxes. Non-tax revenues are those that come from regulatory fees,service/user charges, receipts from economic enterprise, toll fees, and other receipts.3. To compute, (Revenue collection cost ÷ total locally-sourced revenue) x 100.

4. How much is your actual collection from Real Property Tax (RPT) out of the RPT collectibles (in percentage)?

Real Property Tax Accomplishment Rate (in %)

Notes:1. To compute, (amount of RPT collected ÷ amount of projected RPT collection) x 100.

5. How much of the total LGU income is generated from local sources (in percentage)?

Locally Sourced to Total LGU income (in %)

Notes:1. Locally-sourced revenue is composed of tax and non-tax revenues. Tax revenues are sourced from RealProperty Tax, Business Tax, and other taxes. Non-tax revenues are those that come from regulatory fees,service/user charges, receipts from economic enterprise, toll fees, and other receipts.2. Total LGU income is composed of locally sourced revenues, IRA, other share from national, and specialrevenues, i.e., extraordinary receipts/financial aids, loans and borrowings, and inter-local fund transfers. 3. To compute, (Locally Sourced Revenues ÷ Total LGU Income) x 100.

6. What is the proportion of regular revenues to total LGU income (in percentage)?

Regular Revenue to Total Income (in %)

Administrative Governance: p-9

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

Notes:1. Regular revenues mean locally-sourced revenues plus IRA. 2. Total LGU income is composed of locally sourced revenues, IRA, other share from national, and specialrevenues, i.e., extraordinary receipts/financial aids, loans and borrowings, and inter-local fund transfers. 3. To compute, (Regular Revenues ÷ Total income) x 100

Performance Area: Administrative Governance Service Area: Resource Allocation and Utilization

Instruction:

1. On Resource AllocationDoes your LGU operate on a re-enacted budget during the profile year?

Yes No If No, is the Annual Budget approved in consideration of the following?:1.1 Responsive to the budgetary requirements of the Annual Investment Program

YesNo

Satisfies the following budgetary, statutory, and contractual requirements and general limitations:Budgetary requirements:1.2 Amount appropriated did not exceed the estimates of income

YesNo

1.3 The amount of appropriations for debt servicing did not exceed 20\% of the regular income (answer only ifapplicable)

YesNoNA

1.4 20% component of IRA was appropriated for development projectsYesNo

1.5 Provision for aid to barangays is not less than PhP 1,000YesNo

General limitations:1.6 Appropriations for discretionary purposes did not exceed 2\% of the actual receipts from basic real property tax

YesNo

1.7 The total appropriations whether annual or supplemental for personal services did not exceed 45% for 1st-3rd class,and 55% for 4th-6th class.

YesNo

Others:1.8 An amount is appropriated for Gender and Development projects and activities (R.A. 7192 and E.O. 273, s. 1995)

at least 5% of the total budgetless than 5%None at all

Administrative Governance: p-10

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

1.9 An amount is appropriated for the operation and maintenance of the Office for Senior Citizens Affairs (R.A. 9257)YesNo

1.10 An amount is appropriated for the monitoring or surveillance of the magnitude of Acquired Immune DeficiencySyndrome or AIDS (RA 8504)

YesNo

1.11 1% of the IRA is appropriated for the strengthening and implementation of the programs of the Local Council forthe Protection of Children (R.A. 9344)

YesNo

1.12 Approved within the period, October 17 to Dec. 31YesNo

2. On Resource UtilizationWhat is the proportion of your LGU’s expenditures for personal services to total LGU expenditure (inpercentage)?

Personal Services Expenditure Ratio (in %)

Notes:1. To compute, (personnel services expenditures ÷ total expenditures) x 100.

3. Determine the amount of services extended by your LGU to its constituents on a per capita basis.

Total Expenditures per capita (in PhP)

Notes:1. To compute, (Total expenditures ÷ population).

4. Proportion of actual debt service payment of your LGU to total regular income (in %). Has your LGU availedloan?

Yes No If yes, determine the proportion of actual debt service payment.Debt Service Ratio (in %)

Notes:1. Total regular income means locally-sourced income plus IRA.2. To compute, (actual cost for debt servicing ÷ total regular income) x 100.

Performance Area: Administrative Governance Service Area: Customer Service - Civil Applications

Instruction:

1. On Civil Registry DocumentsDetermine the quality of customer service in the processing of civil registry documents, i.e., birth and deathcertificates, using the following criteria:

1.1 Has a database of civil registry recordsYesNo

Administrative Governance: p-11

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

1.2 Set of steps in getting the civil registry records is made known to clients (either through website, posters or othermeans.)

YesNo

1.3 Procedure is clear (i.e., step or steps, processing time, processing fee, transaction hour, etc.)YesNo

1.4. How long does it take to issue a civil registry document, i.e., birth or death certificate?30 mins. or lessMore than 30 mins., but less than 2 hours2 hours or more

Notes:1. Processing Procedure - Computerized means that an embedded system is specially developed for the indexingand processing of real property documents, with real-time computing and reporting design. Computer-aidedmeans that there is no special system designed for the indexing and processing of real property documents but usedexisting computer functions such as excel or access. Manual means that all documents are indexed and processedwithout the help of a computer.

2. On Real Property DocumentsDetermine the quality of customer service in the processing of real property documents, using the followingcriteria:

2.1 Processing of real property documentsComputerizedComputer-AidedManual

2.2 Procedure in securing real property documents is made known to clients (either through website, posters or othermeans.)

YesNo

2.3 Procedure is clear (i.e., step or steps, processing time, processing fee, transaction hour, etc.)YesNo

2.4 Procedure is simple – not more than 4 steps, 4 documentary requirements, and 2 number of signatoriesYesNo

2.5. How long does it take to issue a real property document?30 minutes or lessMore than 30 minutes but less than 8 hours8 hours or more

Notes:1. Processing of real property documents - Computerized means that an embedded system is specially developedfor the indexing and processing of real property documents, with real-time computing and reporting design. Computer-aided means that there is no special system designed for the indexing and processing of real propertydocuments but used existing computer functions such as excel or access. Manual means that all documents areindexed and processed without the help of a computer.

Administrative Governance: p-12

San Carlos City Year Profile: 2012 - LGPMS

Performance Area: Administrative Governance Service Area: Human Resource Management and Development

Instruction:

1. Determine the quality of human resource management and development, using the following criteria:

1.1 Recruitment and selection are transparentYesPartialNo

1.2 Permanency in the nature of appointments is valuedYesNo

1.3 Good performance is recognizedYesNo

1.4 Staff development is availableYesNo

1.5 Grievance system is in placeYesNo

Notes:1. For 1.1, answer “Yes” if all recruitment and selection processes and results, whether for plantilla or non-plantillapositions, are posted, “Partial” if some of the recruitment and selection process and results, whether for plantilla ornon-plantilla positions, are posted, “No” if recruitment and selection processes and results, whether for plantilla ornon-plantilla positions, are not posted.2. For 1.2, answer “Yes” if at least 90\% of the total employees of the LGU occupy plantilla positions, “No” ifbelow 90\% of the total employees of the LGU occupy plantilla positions.3. For 1.3, answer “Yes” if good performers are recognized and given incentives in the form of cash or in kind.Recognition is made either through personnel evaluation, written recommendation, or public acknowledgment.4. For 1.4, answer “Yes” if staff development activities or opportunities are made available to staff, regardless oflevel, or position in a given level, with low performance or to those staff who need career advancement5. For 1.5, answer “Yes” if there is a grievance system where employees can air their grievances and properlyresponded to or acted upon. If this condition is not met, answer “No”.

Administrative Governance: p-13