Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
lABOR RELATIONS
~ UNITEDSTIJTES fl!!:iM POST4L SERVICE
March 7, 2013
Mr. Cliff Guffey President American Postal Workers
UniOn, AFL-CIO 1300 L Street, NW Washington, DC 20005-4128
Dear Cliff:
1'.~,::1 " 2013
Certified Mall Tracking Number: 7012 2920 0000 8276 9662
As information, enclosed is a copy of the first Post Implementation Review for the Mobridge, South Dakota Customer Service Mail Processing Center (CSMPC) Area Mail Processing (AMP),
If you have any questions, please contact Rickey Dean at extension 7 412.
Sincerely,
/A1llf Patrick M. Devine Manager Contract Administration (APWU)
Enclosure
475 L'ENFflfiT Pt..llZA SIN
WASHINGTON lJC :<U:lW-4101
WWW.USPS.COM
(CA2013-240)
----- PIR Data Entry Page -----
Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orlg & Dest Facility Name & Type; Mobridge CSMPC
Street Address: 404 N Main Street
City: Mobridge
State: SD 50 Facility ZIP Code: 57601
District: Dakotas Area: Westem
Finance Number: 465850 Current 3D ZIP Code(s): 576
Miles to Gaining Facility: 114.8 EXFC office: Yes
Plant Manager: Joe Carmody Senior Plant Manager: Todd Snyder (A)
District Manager: Roy T Reynolds
~~ Facility Name & Type: Bismarck P&DF
Street Address: 2220 E Bismarck Expy Rm 212
City: Bismarck State: NO
SD Facility ZIP Code: 56504 District: Dakotas
Area: Western
Finance Number: 370950 Current 30 ZIP Code(s): 565,566
EXFC office: Yes Plant Manager: Brian White
Senior Plant Manager: Todd Snyder (A)
District Manager: Roy T. Reynolds
Approval Date: June 24, 2011 Implementation Date: Jan-01-2012
PIR Type: 1st PIR
Date Range of Data: Jan-01-2012: Processing Days per Year: 310
Bargaining Unit Hours per Year: 1,742 EAS Hours per Year: 1,819
Date of HQ memo, DAR Factors/Cost of Borrowing/
Jun-30-2012
May 7, 2010 Now Facility Start-up Costs Update 1--------------l
Date & Time this. workbook was last saved:
Area Vice President: Sylvester Black Vice Prosident, Network Operations: David E. Williams
Area AMP Coordinator: Stephen Murray NAI Contact: Doris Billinglea I Sarah Grover
02-12-201316:44
PIR Data Entry Page
Approval Signatures
Lollftt,_., ..... __,Typr. .. ....,.~ FfnMtc,e NUmiNr.
Cvnwm-8Cf ZIP en.($
Type qf DtnofbuUon Coneolldallld: -""'"-'""'"'----
<JiiiMI P8CUIQ' ...... lml ~ FftllttyZIPCodll' -Cunent SC' ZP ~
--o.w, ,01_,10"''"""'2 ___ _ oat. R.,._ ol o.ta: to
P'lR Typo: _,, "'"-'P-"!R"---
Jun.J0-2012
~~(llr~AW.JT'I'-1_.,• I ,,.,_, __ ., ..................................... ~,.;- .. ~....,.._...,. .,_... ......... ~1$11811MIIIhJM,....."VIQ\IIi(lli¥o""'""""t'O'•"*'V-CIOIICifl +C.OI...-~~ .. ~-~(11 flftlt ......... .,....be.YII;a 1Q Dill~
ANMliQ rMj;111m
Ptant Mana;er.
Brl81'1White ... Dlatrlot. M•n .. ot:
~~
¥let I'TOt- H<llwort Opontllona:
Da.ld,.£.'0""' ~-01
Losing Facility Name and Type: Street Addren:
City!
State:
cu,..nt $CF ZIP Cudo(a):
Type of Distribution Consolidated:
Gaining Facility Name and Type: street Address:
City:
''''" Current SCF ZIP Code( e):
Savings/Cost§
Staffing
Strvice
Fui'\Ciiol"l 1 Workhour Savings
Noo-Processlr.g Gran Workhour Savif"IQS (leu MalnVTraos)
PCESIEAS WOO<hour Savjngs
Transportation Savings
Maintenance sav1ngs
Total Annual Savins.s
Total One-Time Costs
Total First Year Savings
C.wt Position Lo83
PCESIEAS Position Loss
First-Class Mail S~rYice PerfQri'Tlen<;e (EXFC 0/N)
fil'l>t-CJass Mall Service Performance (EXFC 2 Day)
First-Class Mail Service Performance (EXFC 3 Day)
Customer Exper~nce Measurement Overall Satisfaction Residen~al at PFC level
Customer Experieooe Measurement Overall 5aUslactkm Small BUSineSS at PI"C level
Executive Summary
1at PIR vs Pre AMP 1at PIR VI Approved
($657,727) ($773,778)
$133,998 $133,998
$19,299 $19,299
($21,867) ($353,849)
$41,261 $41,261
$0 $0
($485,035) ($933,068)
$0 $0
($485,035) ($933,068)
(6) (7)
1 1
Losing Cu!Tent Qtr Gaining Current Qtr
100.00% 96.30%
93.22% 91.74%
94.44% 93.11%
89.58%
65.15%
PIR Type: 1st PIR
TrOm rnonsponaNon HCR ond Tr&nsp<>llaff<>n PVS
from Sttlffmg.Crafl
from stamt~Q.PCES!EAS
rrom SeNictl Pwfomi.Jnce & CSM
PIR Executive Summary
_____ ::_;;:::>;-&yJ, ·--'-"' -'·' _____ -·""~:.::;;:;: .:~.~· ----- .·:·;~.,;,:~! -,~,--,-- ~'.;$iM:flc>•1 ,-;i4~\'ii!!J~~-:c,LC\;;)Wilf'{~~Y)_.,_ '-<-;i;~\&,;!!~c-:\,;:.;(!l<lltlW'il/)';'i~;f~:if.:~;l:r~";-, _,-
Calculation References combllled LOS/nflana Gaming Faclllly Data:
Function 1 Wort<.hour CO$\$
Non-Prooossing Craft Workhour C<tats (loss Mairltononoo & Tr..,opotlatlon)
PCESJEAS workhour CO$ts
Transportation Coal$
Ma1ntenance Costs
Space savlnas Total Annual Cost
Total On&-Time Cost$
Total FlretYeor
cran Pos.non Total On-ROlls
PCESIEA$ Po~ition Totol Ort<-Roll~
Funetion 1 Wotkhour Savings
Nur>-PrcootN<flll Cllffl 'Mlrllh<•Jf SII\IU)\jS (0.•• ~omVT .. no)
PCESIEAS Wor~hour Sav'n1gs
Transporta~on Savings
Maintenam;c Saving5
Space Savings
Total Annual Savinga
Total One-Time Costs
Total First Year Savings
-Craft Position Loss
PCESIEAS Posiliorr Loss
PreAMP
$3,826,363
$778,653 $533,762
$1,173,419 $1,336,522
$0 $7,648,719
$0
$7,648,719
68
4
Proposed
$3,710,312
$778,653 $533,762 $841,437
$1.336.522 $0
$7,200,686
$0
$7,200,688
67
6
1st PIR
$4,484,090
$644,655 $514,463
$1,195,286 $1,295.261
$0 $8,133,754
$0
$8,133,754
74
5
~~~;;~s~~~~~-t~f{s:~~+.~t:-~~~~1~~ 1st PIR vs Proposed
1st PIR vs Pre-AMP (Approved) AMP Approved AMP
($657,727) ($773,778) $116,051 $133,998 $133,998 $0
$19,299 $19,299 $0 ($21 ,867) ($353,849) $331,983 $41,261 $41,261 $0
$0 $0 $0 ($485,035) ($933.068) $448,033
$0 $0 $0
($485,035) ($933,068) $448,033
(6) (7) 1
(1) 1 (2)
PIR Executive Summary
Summary Narrative Losing Facility Name and Type:
Current SCF ZIP Code(s):
Last Saved: February 12. 2013
Mobridge CSMPC 576
Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest
Gaining Facility Name and Type: Bismarck P&DF Current SCF ZIP Code(s): 585,586
8eekground
The Dakotas Perf()(I'Tlance Cluster, with the assistance from the Western Area Office, has completed an Area Mail Processing (AMP) &-month Post Implementation Review to measure the success of consotidatlon of mail processing operations from Mobridge SD CSMPC (576) to the Bismarck NO P&DF {585). The AMP was approved on June 24. 2011.
The approved AMP transferred the processing of all originating and deslinatlng volumes for the 576 ZIP Code service areas to Bismarck NO P&DF from Mobridge SO CSMPC. The transfer of volumes was completed on Dec 1 , 2011.
The Mobridge CSMPC was a USPS-owned faCility located approximately 115 miles from the USPSowned Bismarck P&DF. There have been no changes to local mau collection box pick-up times due to AMP. Add111ona11y, mere been no changes to retail or BMEU operations as a result of the AMP Implementation ana Mailers are able to Cleposlt the1r man tnrough the MobriDge Post omce BMEU as done befOJe the AMP was Implemented. A local MOI>ritlge postmarK Is stm avaital>le.
F!npnc!a! SumiD!I!ry
Financial savings identified during this first PIR stucly for this GOnsolldation of originating and destinating operations are:
Total Annual Savings ($ 401 ,395)
CombiQ<O<I~Inli'.,dGoltJinli'F-*1 D•IO: PreAMP Pro pond 1atPIR F..-.otlon1Wo<l<r.:..-CQoto -$3,626,363 ' $3,710,312 $4,484,090
Non-l'roo<IO .. "ff Cn'lftWo<l<r.:..- CQoiS $778,653 $778,653 $644.655 ''"' illln~nonot • r .... _ .. )
PCESIEAS Vll>ndlot.r CoN $533.762 $533,?@~ $514,463 Tran&por!allonCosts $1,173,419 $757,797 $1,111,646
M,;--.,,.,. Cools $1,336,522 $1,338,522 $1,295,261 Sp""":;la\Or>ijo $0 $0 $0
TOUII Annual COlt $7,648,719 $7,117,046 $8.050,114
ToUII one-Time costs $0 $0 $0
Totalflr.tYear $7,648,719 $7117046 $8.050.114
1 he 6-month PIR Identifies that the AMP is not meeting the expectations of the approved AMP due to the following om1ss1ons ana ISSues in planning for the event, Identified below, that have impacted this first PIR flnanctals.
• HCR Route 570MG from SIOUX Falls to Mobridge was proposed for elimination in the approved AMP with a projected savings of $174,872. Wltn the P1erre to Dakota Central AMP being placed On-Hold awaiting implementation or Netwonc. RationaiiZBIIOn InitiatiVe, only the Pierre to Mobridge portion of this trip GOuld be terminated to maintain service responsiVeness required between Sioux Falls and Pierre. The PIR identifie5 a 5avlng5 of $1 ~.916 for the adjustment made to the HCR to support lhiG AMP;
Due to rapid expansion of energy development drilling activity in Westem North Dakota, all large truck5 command premium prices due to demand exeeecting supply. Any new (AMP required fQ,ur, 56594 w115 box delivery and not included) or expiring transportation contractsrMulled in contract awards that far higher than Area T ransportatlon projected. For the four new over-the-road routes
PIR Summary Narrative
• added with the approved AMP, the actual awarclecl cost per mile versus projected eQuates to an additional tran1portation cost of $221,596;
• Impact of the lfansfer of major mailer One World Priority ancl1"1 class parcels on Bismarck operations. Pre-AMP these volumes were transported to Sioux Falls for processing on their APBS ana tnus, these volumes and associated workload was I'IOt accounted for in the approved AMP. This transfer of volume resulted In an a<tdltlonal10,835 hour annually or $323,512;
• Addttlonatly, Mobridge Is must ao AO Prep on lhese parcels to separate local overnight and l>Urface dispatches from air volumes, which accounts ror their 1,903 annual hours over propoaed or $65,937. Dakotas District Is currently researching the economics of returning these parcels to the automated APBS sort In Sioux Falls.
Adjusting for the above detail concurreot initiatives and issues identified with the Approved AMP and 6-month PIR data Impacting both the losing and gaining sites, the projected Ann11al Savlnga for tfle Mobridge AMP Is $209,850, but not exceeding the approved AMP expected savings of $542,339. A portion of this can be attributed to an overall decline In F1 productivity as measured by BPI.
Customer Service Considerations
There were nine OND service pair upgrades and six dov.ngrades with the implementation of the AMP. National Distribution and Labeling List changes were submiHed as appropriate for lists L002, L003, L004, L005, L011, L201, L601, L602, L605, L607 & L801, and published in PB 22321 on October 6, 2011.
Area Dlstrtl>utions center changes were made for the 576 SCF. Fargo ND is the AADC for letters and nats. BismarCk NO Js now the ADC for pnonty mail.
The Mobrio:Jge SO ~76 CSMPC EXFC First Class Mall 5ervlce performance from TTMS iS:
The Bismarck P&DF EXFC First Class SeiVice performance from TTMS is:
PIR Summary Narrative
Initial indicators show overall slight improvement in 311 sef\lice categorieS to pre-AMP scores.
§llfflng Impacts
The approved Mobridge AMP proposal identified a net reduction of 1 craft position with Mobridge reducing 4 dlstnDullon pos1t10t1S and Bismarck adding 3 diStribUtion positions. The approved AMP ldentlflea an increase of two EAS that were authorized but vacant at the time of the study.
The 6-month PIR data reflects a net craft complement increa5e of 6 posnlons with Mobridge reducing 3 distrlbuUon positions and Bi:smorc;k P&DF lncrea:sing by 9 distribution po:>itions. The additional distribution positions were added to reduce lhe overtime percentage at time of AMP Implementation al"ld to process the additional parcel volume that was transferred from Sioux Fab to Bismarck with AMP implementation. During the pre-AMP base period Bismarck P&DF had an overtime percentage of over 20%, which has been reduced to 10% to 15% In recent months.
' Craft • FTR+PTR+PTF+Cnual•
The staffing Impacts on management-to-craft ratiOS are SI.JTimanzed In the table below:
1 Crall• FTR+PTR+PTF+Coeo.~llle
'Craflc F1 + F4 at Losing: Ft only at Ga1n111g
All affected employees that were reassigned to other Pos.tal facMities were subfect to proceues outlined in the National Labor Agreements. Pursuant to the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN), the USPS is complying with the National Labor Agreements in reassigning employees.
PIR Summary Narrative
Tranaportmlon Changn
All transportation supporting both Bismarck and Mobridge is exclusively HCR with no PVS service. The approved Mobridge AMP prOjected annual transportation savings of $415.623 with the 6-month PtR data projecting an annual savings of $61.773 due to d'langes made both prior to and post AMP implementation.
Specific changes to HCR transportation identified in the original AMP include: • HCR 57631 was terminated as planned and replaced bY HCR 57680 & 58585 to meet DOT
regulations; • HCRs 57611 and 576A8 were terminated as proposed; • HCR 576AO was split to eliminate the box delivery portion of the route and this portion was
replaced by HCR 58584; • HCR 576MU was terminated as planned and replaced with HCR 58583 with an additional trip
addecl aue to One wona Priority mall volumes; • HCR 57632 was terminated as planned and replaced with HCR 58582: • HCR 570MG was not terminated as proposed due to the Pierre to Dakota Central AMP being
placea On-Hold and only the Pierre to Moonage portion of this trip could be terminated to maintain service responsiveness required between Sioux Falls and Pierre. rne Pierre to Mobrloge leg was eliminated from the route;
• HCR 57710 was aOjusteu to only perform service from Rapid City to Pierre with tne Pierre to Mobridge leg tenninateo as no longer require!J for OND service performance with Implementation.
Those adjustments were necessary to ensure operating plan perform<1nce for timely processi~ of originating and de$tlnating volume$.
l!gutpmtnt Rs!oeatlon and Malntonenso tmpasl!
One CSBCS In Mobridge was eliminated. Four phase 1 DBCS stacker modules were added to the DBCS in Bismarck.
One CSBCS was removed from Mobridge as proposed and four stacker modules were added to the Phase 1 OBCS in Bismarck. There were neither one-lime equipment relocation costs nor facility modifications associated with the expansion of the existing machine as work was performed utilizing inhouse maintenance staff.
The AMP proposed a no change In maintenance cost of as a result of the AMP, with the PIR reflecting a savrngs ot $41.261 that can be attributed to toea I initiatives to reduce costs.
summary:
The full AMP uf originalillQ and Oestlnallng maM volumes from the Mobridge SD CSMPC to Btsmarck P&DF was fully implemellted on December 1, 2011.
The 6-month PIR identified on odditionol coet of $401,395 a~ compared to the pre-AMP pertod. Thi5 additionol cost is directly related to HCR contract c~»ts tho! were higher than projeeted. tho proc.cssing of parcel volumes that were previously processed at Sioux Fall$ P&DC and were not accounted for in the AMP propoial, and overall decline in F1 productivity due to high overtime ond inability to bring sufficient on board due to "Oil Boom" in western North Dakota.
PIR Summary Narrative
Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction Measurement L11~t Saved: February 12,2013
Losing Facility: Mobridge CSMPC District: Dakotas
After AMP
PIR Type: Implementation Date:
- ,,, __
1st PIR 01/01/12
Gaining Facility: jB~i~sm~a~rc~k=P=&=D=F=========== District: Dakotas
EXFC 0/D
After AMP
PIR Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction Measurement
' ! I l ' I 8
' I • , l i
'
! I !
'' !S ;
~ ~ " ' ' t •
~
I !
! i ! I !
~ ! ' I • l ~
"· H
~ " ; >
~ < ·f 0
'
i i
' • • ' I i 0 0 0
I ~ 0 • <
i ~
~~mmmnmmmnmmmnmmmnmmmnmmmffl*mm~~
~
f • i 8 !
i !
! ' ' ' l i • I i ' l •' ,. ,,
'8. ! ' ' ! • • • !
2
~ • 0
~ ! ' • ' I ' 0 • ' -~ l ! I
' • ' • ! ~
! ! !
I Other Workhour Move Aflalysis I LC<JiOg Facj!ly· Mol::odoe CSNPC Gaining Facjoty Bosmarck P&OF Date"""~~<' ot oaa 01101112 lo OO'liOi12
I 1st PIR Other losina Craft Workhours I I 1st PIR PIR Other Gainina Craft Workhours I
PR otworWakhoor Costs
Staffing - Craft Last Saved: February 12. 2013
PIR Type: 1st PIR Data Extraction Date: 07102/12 -----
Craft Po:>itioms
_, _____ ,_,,,.,_, __ -
Craft Positions 111 PIR
r-----(23>-----r·----(24)-----1 1 1st PIR vs Pre AMP 1 1st PIR vs Proposed •
Total Craft Position Loss: i (6) i (7) i ·~--------------------------· (Above numbef'J are e;orr;.<lforwar<l to theEx.wutive Summary)
PIR Staffing- Craft
Staffing • PCES/EAS
PCES/EAS Positions
Position Title
Last Saved: Fellru1irl' 12. 2013
PIR Typit; lsl PIR
PIR Staffing- PCESIEAS
Fln•nc• 11 '''''""'"'------o.ta E.U.otlo~ Dot;"
PCES/EAS Positions
PJR Staffing- PCESJEAS
losing Facility: Mobridge CSMPC Finance Number: 465850
Transportation - PVS last Saved: February 12, 2013
PIR Type: 1st PIR
Date Range of Data: Jan-01-2012 - to -- ,J~"~"~-30-:::..:20::..c12:.._ ___ _
(11) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation-PVS Savings: $0 (12) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportation·PVS Savings: $0 (Thi$ mmDer added to the Executive Sl!mmary {This nunber added to the Executive Summary)
(13jNo~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ' ; """'"'.,.....,.,., ' "of :WfW'W~"'ii~W :;:t·J'
PI R Transportation - P\15
Losing Facility: Mobridge CSMPC
Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Oest
Data of HCR Data File: 07101112
, .. , ...
Transportation - HCR Last Saved: February 12, 2013
PIR Type: 1st PIR
CTfor Outbound Dock:
... lllol
PIR Transportation HCR- losing
Costs
(12)
Cllange Analysil 1st PIR 'IS Pre AMP I 1st PIR vs Proposed
PIR Transportation HCR- Losing
Transportation • HCR last Saved: Februaty 12, 2013
Gaining Facility:~B~is~m::a~rc:::k:_P:._:&~D~F~-----------------Type of Disbibution Consolidated: Orig & Oest
Date of HCR Data Ale:
I t~\
CETfor Inbound Dock:
CET for Cancellations:
PIR Type: Orig & Dest
CETforOGP: ____ _
CT for Outbound Dock:
' ,~- ... , 1stPIR Annual
Cost/Mile
PIR Transportation HCR- Gaining
Ch11nge Ana1Y$1S 1stPIR vs
(13) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transpol1ation-HCR Savings: (from losing and gaining facilities)
$21,867
(14) Total1s1 PIR vs Proposed Transportation-HeR Savings: (from losing and gaining facilities)
(15)Total1stPIR vs Prv AMP Transportation (PVS & HCR): $21,867 (This number carried forward to the Executive Svmmary)
(16) T otal1 st PIR vs Proposed Transportation (PVS & HCR): (This number C<!lrried forward to the Executive SlJmmary)
$353,849
$353,849
PIR Transportation HCR. Gairling
Data Extraction Date: ___ _
Losing Facility: Mobridge CSMPC
(10)Ncltes;
MPE Inventory Last Saved: February 12, 2013
PIR Type: 1st PIR Date Range of Data: Jan-01-2012 --to-- Jun-30-2012
Gaining Facility: Bismarck P&OF
L ,;_~!LA--"': I 121 I 111::1 ld 1'71 I lA\ I ten I
- 1stPIR
0 $D $D
$0
Space Evaluation and
Variance in Coots
$0
PIR MPE Inventory
Maintenance last s...ed Feb!'uary 12. <01~
PIR Type~: 1~ PIR Date Range of Data: Jan-01·21:112 : Jun-30-2012
losing Fa<:ll~: Mobndga CSNPC Gaining Facility: "'c'~""'c""c.:.':8D:::_F _______________ _
F Mail PI"OU$5
e-==~---Equ~ LDC l7
U>C"
T'"'
WQ>'kbour C<lSI
'""'""'
[;;][~J "' "' i Variance \larA nee 1et PIFt j" 1St PIFt to htf'IFtto Costs PreAMP '• "
0 ' o\ 0$ •
os oj· os o
== I.Ut $ 1.762 -~ 501 $ .,
---0-$ o\ O$ o
== t os ot: os o
--- (' 1,281 $ 1782 ' 501 $ 501 - 1
'~ =r
""" 0 •
~--····~ 22.421l ~ :!,t-14 $
--
~ Ma~ Pro<:e~ \............. ~!olipl
"'"'' IDC"
F Maintenance OperatiOl: Suppo1
r.=::- Maintenance \ ........, """ Tralnlrlg
ww<lxlur C<»t SublOUil
Parts emf Su~pl es
(1111at PIR V$ Pre ANP- Maintenance &.vlngs: {$41,261 J
(12) 1st PIR V$ Proposed -Maintenanc:eSavlllQS: ($41,261)
1~1 ,., j; ~ (ml
\ V~r1ance 1st Variance 1st tst PIR PIRI(IPre PIRioPre eo.• .. ,
I """'" .....,009. 660.825 $ -·-· 19,(64 $ 19,064
A~ 534 ~ 17.!21) $
~-65,1J14 $
---11,121)
-321.391 $ ?liB 317 • (15 074: $ ilS,N4)
------~"907 ' 61,674 $ ---- t,Zl4 $ 1,~34 .
26.G42 $ ?n><l ~ (l4 0141 ' i14,D14)
-- --.. -,-.-.~-l (11.269) $ 1.1«l.MI $ 1?1 2j;H)
-·,--------
~~.15e ~ (1~,2001 $ (l2.23S)
:r 0 ... 0
1,272,833~ 14HJ5) $ (~3.005)
(Thesel'lllllber$ conied lorwardlo lhe Ex~~)
(These rlJmt>en canied forward 1o tile Ex~ Summ~t~Y)
(13)Notes:================================================= '0.0."' "IR "*'""' • ........... ~'F ... ""'
,!-tih~ d,'-.;t·~--
,,,
Distribution Changes Last Saved: Fetrua~ 12, 2013
Losing Facility : Mobridge CSMPC PIR Type: 1st PIR
Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest Date Range of Data: Jan-01-2012 -to- Jun-30-2012
Place a .. r next to tile DMM labeling list(s) revised as result of the approved AMP --
OMML001 X DMML011
X DMML002 X DMM L201
X 0MML003 X Dt.9v'll601
X DMM L004- X [)t.N l602
X DMMLOOS Dt.IM L603
OMML006 DMM L604
OMM L007 X DMML605
DMML008 DMM l606
av!M L009 X DMM l607
DMM LD10 X Dt.f./1 L8Q1
i
Identify the date of the Postal Bulletin that contained o• labeling list revisions.
<~ PB 22321 10-6-11
Was the Service Standard Directory updated for the approved AMP?
<~ YES
{4J Drop Shipments for Destination Entry Discounts
Faclltty Name
MOBRIDGE
MOBRIDGE I N/A
BISMARCK 82 14 117.07%1 45 D 0.00% 68 82.93%
BISMARCK 64 6 I 9.38% I 35 D 0.00% 58 90.62%
(5JNo~s: ________________________________________________________ -===============================
ir- -~- t~\~~-~~A~
PIR Oistritlution Changes
2
4
Customer Service Issues l.>SIS&ved Fel>fliOI)' 12 2013
Losing Fatllity;i~o~boi~d;go~C~S~M~PC~~~=::::::===~ 5-0iglt 21P Code: 57601 O..tll &traetiono.e: 07J16112
~ ... _ .. ~- ,..._ .. _, "'?"
1. Colltdlon Point! NlJI1'"0erpid:edup bel<lr9 1 p rn.
Number p4cked up t:oeMeen 1-5 p rn. Nuirbor pocked up after 5 p_rn_ _ ., , ,, ..
Tota Nurrber of Collodion Po1rts tE 2. How maQy collecton bolr:IH a" curnnttf d9sign!ted lor "'Jo:>cal dtlivery"? I I 3. How many "local delivery" bcxe$ _., remOI'EHl u a r.sult of AMF'?
4. Dellvtfy Pilrtorrn•nce Report
% earners ret""'"'9 bete<e 5 p m
6. Ret-.11 U•lt lnsld• Losing F!ICillty (Window Service nmes) 8. B~slness (Butk) Mall Acceptance Hours
7. can custoa>on oMolo a- pastn~orl<ln """"""'""" wflllapplic.a~policiHinO!e ,_()p...-.._n YH
8. Notes;
Gaining Facility:,s,;-""""'"-'P~&~D"F _____________ _
9. Mat !)OStmar!\ is printed on collection mall? I BISMARCK NO P&Df I DATEITJME
, $'{:'""'~· :: rx-
PIR Customer Service IIISUOS
Losing Facility: Mobridge CSMPC
1. Allected facility
2 On~TimeCoSis
3 Savmas lnlonnation
Space Evaluation and Other Costs Llllll)aveQ: fi!OrUII)' 12,201~
Space EvaluatJOr
~ ~
Date: _____ _
i'fhOse n..,bers slloom &lOW undQl" OM-Tn•"' Cost< •e<bon )
Space Savings IS):---"'-- ~ ~
(Tflese r•,.nbars c:a-nea IOIWard lo the Eucw ... Summa~}')
One-Time Costs
Empl¢yee Reloca~on C0$1$ $0
Mail Processing Equipment ReiOC!Ition Costs " $0 " (from 1./PE 1n...mor.1
Facility Costs $0 10 $0 llrom above)
Total One-Time Cosu $0 $0 lo PIR COOlS temoel Jolwaf1110 Ex<lcvtlw SUI!WI!MV)
Remote Encoding Cortt()r Cost fWf 1 00{
~ing F11cillty: Mobridge CSMPC
r---,,---~;;:P:~:-A:M:P~•;!FY!;:2~0~11:::;.,-,,-,--;;;-:R:•:•oo: ";":'~"":":.,--.;;;~:~;::;;:!;;,.-... ,.--,.-.,.,-.,
PIR Space Evllk!ation and Other Costs
