35
2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Office of Federal Programs

2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring

  • Upload
    ardice

  • View
    44

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring . Office of Federal Programs . ESEA Fiscal and Program Compliance. General Education Provisions Act Sec. 440(a) Section 80.40 of EDGAR A-102 Common Rule and OMB Circular A-110 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring

2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring

Office of Federal Programs

Page 2: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
Page 3: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring

ESEA Fiscal and Program Compliance

• General Education Provisions Act Sec. 440(a) • Section 80.40 of EDGAR • A-102 Common Rule and OMB Circular A-110 • OMB Circular 133 Subpart D--Federal Agencies

and Pass-Through Entities Responsibilities

Page 4: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring

ESEA Consolidated Monitoring

• Title I• Title II• Title III• Title VI (RLIS)• McKinney Vento

Page 5: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring

Two – Phase ESEA Compliance Monitoring Process

• Risk Assessment Criteria Approach to Identify LEAs for ESEA Compliance Monitoring

- Phase One: Cyclical Monitoring Process - Phase Two: On-site Technical Assistance

Monitoring

Note: Not all Counties will receive both Phases of Monitoring

Page 6: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
Page 7: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring

Phase One: Cyclical Monitoring Process

• Initiated during the 2013-14 year • Utilizes Risk Assessment to Establish a Five-

Year Schedule concluding in 2017-2018• 11 LEAs Monitored Annually through a Desk-

Audit Process • The LEA will Electronically Upload Compliance

Documentation to the HQSDCS as Outlined by the ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Indicators

Page 8: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring

Phase One: Review and Reporting

• SEA Staff will Review the LEA Uploaded Documentation

• SEA Monitoring Lead will Schedule a Teleconference with the LEA to Discuss and Verify Documentation

• A Monitoring Report will be Provided to the LEA within 60 days of the Documentation Submittal

• The LEA will have 30 Business Days to Respond to the Monitoring with Corrective Action Plans

Page 9: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring

Phase One: Appeals Process

• LEA May Appeal if Evidence of a Finding is Inaccurate

• Submitted in Writing within 30 days of Receipt of the Monitoring Report

• Documentation to Support Appeal Must be Submitted to WVDE with the Response

Page 10: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring

Phase Two: On-Site Technical Assistance Monitoring

• Based on Annual Risk Assessment Rakings• A Maximum of Five On-Site Monitoring Visits will be Conducted Each

Year*• Counties with a Rating of 13 or Higher May Receive an On-Site Visit this

Year• Scheduled at a Mutually Convenient Time • Purpose: to Develop a Plan for Addressing Concerns from Monitoring

Report (no school visits will be conducted)

*Note that monitoring for specific program issues may be conducted at any time at the discretion of WVDE in response to written complaint/concern received by WVDE, Office of Federal Programs

Page 11: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring

Phase Two: Preparation for Visit

• WVDE Team Leader will Collaborate with the LEA’s Designated Lead to Develop a Schedule

• The WVDE Team Leader will Confirm the Schedule at Least One Month prior to the On-Site Visit

Page 12: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring

Phase Two: Activities During the On-Site Visit

• On-Site will Focus on Clarification of Compliance Concerns and Technical Assistance for Corrective Action from Desk Audit

• Documentation for Each Year Since Last Monitoring

• Availability of Appropriate LEA Staff • Development of a One-Year Workplan to

Prioritize Correction of Non-Compliance and Identify Technical Assistance

Page 13: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring

Phase Two: On-Site Monitoring Report

• The Workplan Developed During the On-Site Visit will form an Addendum to the Report Compiled During the Desk Audit.

• The Report will be issued Electronically to the LEA by WVDE within 30 Business Days of the On-Site Visit.

• A Written Acknowledgement of the On-Site Addendum Shall be Provided by the LEA with the Signature of LEA Superintendent

Page 14: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring

Questions?

Page 15: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring

High Quality Schools Data Collection System for Uploading Monitoring Documentation

Page 16: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring

LEA Indicator Document

Page 17: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring

ESEA Compliance Indicators • Organized under Seven West Virginia

Standards for High Quality Schools• Three Forms of Verification-Interview Questions (Teleconference)-WVEIS Data (Reviewed Internally by WVDE)-Documentation in HQSDCS (Uploaded by LEA for Desk Audit)

Page 18: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
Page 19: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
Page 20: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
Page 21: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
Page 22: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
Page 23: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
Page 24: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
Page 25: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
Page 26: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
Page 27: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
Page 28: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
Page 29: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
Page 30: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring

Questions?

Page 31: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring

General Topics

• 5-17 Report• Sequestration• Reading by 3rd Grade • Educator Evaluation• Professional Development• Building LEA Capacity for School Improvement• Parent Involvement

Page 32: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring

Themes

• Maximize Impact of Program Funds• Reduce the burden of compliance planning

requirements that do not add value

Page 33: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring

Goals

• To network to increase idea base for program planning

• To provide input to the SEA regarding ways to support the two identified themes

Page 34: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring

Guiding Questions

• How can we improve our leadership structures to accomplish our curriculum and instruction goals?

• How do we improve capacity and human capital?

• How do we effectively engage all stakeholders? • How can we maximize personnel to achieve our

intended program impact?

Page 35: 2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Monitoring

Task

• In 15 minutes generate one program planning idea/issue that you would like to pursue through network problem-solving