84
QUARTERLY GEAR, AFRICA: terrorists in special ops Bad news of possibility Special Operations SOF on the EDGE 2012 SPRING EDITION SUPERBOOK for HEROIC AIR FORCE PJ last stand the of an

2012 Spring Edition

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

DEFENSE STANDARD, focused on the warfighter

Citation preview

Page 1: 2012 Spring Edition

QUARTERLY

GEAR,AFRICA:

terrorists

inspecial ops

Bad news of possibility

Special Operations

SOFon the EDGE

2012 SPRING EDITION

SUPERBOOK

for

HEROICAIR FORCE PJ

last standthe

of an

Page 2: 2012 Spring Edition
Page 3: 2012 Spring Edition
Page 4: 2012 Spring Edition

Educating their

childrenProviding full college educations to the surviving children of fallen Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps special operations personnel since 1980. Funding provided for tuition, books, fees, room and board.

Wounded WarriorSupport

Providing immediate financial assistance to severely wounded special operations personnel so their loved ones can be bedside during their recovery.

www.specialops.orgCFC # 11455

Caring for Families of Fallen

and Wounded Special Operations Warriors

Page 5: 2012 Spring Edition

5Spr ing 2012 DEFENSE STANDARD

C o n t e n t s

F e a t u r e s

11 Letter from the Publisher

Budget Battles

DoD largely spares Special Operations from ever-deepening cuts from the budget ax.

By James Kitfield

A PJ’s Sacrifice

The first combat rescue mission of Senior Airman Jason Cunningham was also his last.

By Elaine S. Povich

18

12

P r o c u r e m e n t a n d O p e r a t i o n s

Base Instincts

Transport ship modification is the first step in building floating forward staging bases.

By Marc Selinger

32

Weather Commandos

Air Force Special Operations weather teams jump in to provide front-line forecasts.

By Tony Mecia

38

12

24

38

44

Special Operations in Africa

Growing SOF presence quietly targets new terrorist lairs and political instability.

By John Pulley

24

High-Tech Tools

DARPA and U.S. Special Operations Command dream up game-changing equipment.

By Rich Tuttle

44

JTRS

Army Rangers give key element of the Joint Tactical Radio System a thumbs up.

By Rich Tuttle

50

Page 6: 2012 Spring Edition
Page 7: 2012 Spring Edition

7Spr ing 2012 DEFENSE STANDARD

C o n t e n t s

O n t h e H o m e f r o n t

Final Dive

Special Operators commit the ashes of the father of military combat diving to the sea.

By Dave Chace

Photos by Russell Lee Klika

76

‘ 1 3 P r o c u r e m e n t p r e v i e w

Air Force: B-3 BomberBy Nick Adde

Army: StrykerBy Matthew Cox

Marine Corps: AH-1Z CobraBy Nick Adde

Navy: F-35 JSFBy John T. Bennett

69

71

73

75

Louder than Words

71

76

82

62

81

Final Frame82

About the Cover Photographer

Russell Lee Klika’s photos dramatically document Special Operations training and missions.

o n t h e c o v e rQUARTERLY

GEAR,

AFRICA:

terrorists

inspecial opsBad news

of possibility

Special Operations

SOFon theEDGE

2012 SPRING EDITION

QU

ARTERLY

DEFEN

SE STAN

DARD

2012 SPRING

EDITIO

N

SUPERBOOK

for

HEROICAIR FORCE PJ

last stand

the

of an

A private from the Tennessee Army National Guard’s 278th Armored Cavalry

Regiment during a semi-relaxed moment in Iraq.

PHOTO: Courtesy of Russell Klika

Equipping the Spear

Industry ingenuity turns off-the-shelf technology into sophisticated Special Operations gear.

By Rich Tuttle

56

Gear for Fido

Special Operations K-9s get special equipment for sniffing out trouble.

By Elaine S. Povich

62

Page 8: 2012 Spring Edition

You serve us. Let us serve you with generous benefits including: + Tuition Discounts and Fee Waivers + Free Book Vouchers + Dedicated Military Affairs Office + College Credit for Military Training + Heroes Fund Scholarship

Get Started

today!

(877) 660-4796www.LUOnline.com/defense

As one of America’s top military-friendly schools, Liberty University Online offers more than 45 career-ready degree programs and 100 specializations to prepare you for a military career and beyond.

YOU COULD gAinAn On THeedge

competition?

Proud partners with the Yellow Ribbon Program, GoArmyEd®, SOC Network and Air University Associate to Baccalaureate Cooperative (AU-ABC).

yellowribbonprogram

20

09

M O S T P O P U L A R C O L L E G E S

M I L I T A R Y T I M E S

Page 9: 2012 Spring Edition

www.defensestandard.com

2012 SPRING EDITION

Copyright 2011-2012. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited. The opinions expressed within this publication do not necessarily represent the views of the publisher. Defense Standard LLC assumes no responsibilites for the advertisements or any representations made in this publication. Defense Standard LLC in unable to accept, or hereby expressly disclaims, any liability for the consequences of inaccuracies or omissions of such information occurring during the publishing of such information for publication.

DEFENSE STANDARD HQ4410 Massachusetts Avenue

Suite 240

Washington, D.C. 20016

Phone: (202) 640-2137

DEFENSE STANDARD OPERATIONS CENTER14310 N. Dale Mabry Highway, Ste 200

Tampa, FL 33618

Phone: (813) 864-6360

EDITOR

EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT

VICE PRESIDENT OF OPERATIONS

CREATIVE DIRECTOR

PRODUCTION ASSISTANT

VICE PRESIDENT OF MILITARY & GOVERNMENT RELATIONS

SENIOR ADVISER

MILITARY ADVISER

SPECIAL OPERATIONS ADVISER

LEAD RESEARCHER

OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM ANALYST

FIELD OPERATIONS

GENERAL COUNSEL

ASSISTANT TO THE PUBLISHER

SOFIC TRADESHOW AMBASSADORS

Nick Adde

John T. Bennett

Julie Bird

Dave Chace

Matthew Cox

James Kitfield

Tony Mecia

Elaine S. Povich

John Pulley

Marc Selinger

Rich Tuttle

David PeabodyPRESIDENT and PUBLISHER

WRITERS:

Julie Bird

Kelly Montgomery

Daniel J. Peabody

Samantha Gibbons

Jennifer Roark McCants

Martin J. McAuliffe

Steven Zheutlin, Ph.D.

Jerry L. Montgomery, Col. USAF (RET)

John Carl Roat

Lee Anne McAuliffe

Sammy Rosario

Justin DeJesus

Jayson Dehainaut

Gabriel W. Falbo, Esquire

Benjamin Peabody

Jennifer Kirkpatrick

Gabriella Maria

Disclaimer: Neither the Department of Defense nor any other United States Government agency has approved, endorsed or authorized this publication in any form. No such inference is suggested, promoted or communicated in any manner.

Dedicated to the Memory of

Richard “Richie” Thomason November 9, 1945 - April 17, 2012

U.S. Army Veteran

Page 10: 2012 Spring Edition

MILITARYIS OUR MIDDLE NAME.

Art & Humanities | Business | Education | Management | Public Service & Health | Science & Technology | Security & Global Studies

Rebecca Sechrist | SPC, USA Graduate, School of Security & Global StudiesOur military roots run deep. From Fort Bragg to Afghanistan, AMU is

dedicated to educating those who serve. With access to quality courses,

unrivaled support, and a book grant for undergraduates, we stand

behind our community— 60,000 military members strong.

Learn More at www.amuonline.com/DS

AMU_DS_0212.indd 1 2/23/12 9:49 AM

Page 11: 2012 Spring Edition

P u b l i s h e r ’ s N o t e

11Spr ing 2012 DEFENSE STANDARD

Welcome to our annual Special Operations issue, chock full of reports about our nation’s silent warriors.

To be honest, this is always one of our more challenging issues. The Special Operations world isn’t known for providing a lot of detail about what it does or how it spends its money.

Fortunately, we get it. We understand the security concerns, and our journalists work with those restrictions. Meanwhile, the Pentagon’s crack Combat Camera photographers – including Russell Lee Klika, whose work is featured on this issue’s cover, as well as in a story about the burial at sea for the father of military combat diving – can be counted on to provide compelling photos that don’t give away any secrets about covert operations.

And so, a year after SEAL Team 6 took out Osama bin Laden in a daring raid at the terrorist’s home in Abbottabad, Pakistan – surely one of Special Operations Forces’ most celebrated victories – we’re pleased to bring you this SOF Superbook.

We start with the story of Senior Airman Jason Cunningham, an Air Force Special Operations pararescueman who saved the lives of at least 10 wounded warriors in Afghanistan a decade ago in what became known as the Battle of Robert’s Ridge before succumbing to internal injuries from gunfire to the gut. Even after he was wounded, Cunningham repeatedly risked his life crossing the live-fire line to move injured men to relative safety.

We also tell you the story of a lesser-known element of Air Force Special Operations – the SOF weather teams. These scientist-commandos parachute out of airplanes, fast-rope out of helicopters and do whatever else it takes to gather weather information critical to the success of covert operations. Think about how a sudden sandstorm or thunderstorm can wreak havoc on a high-value operation, and you’ll understand why what these air weathermen do is so important. Al Roker, they’re not.

This issue also takes a look at SOF’s emerging mission in Africa under the U.S. Africa Command. Details are minimal at this point, but defense officials have openly expressed concern that al Qaeda and other terrorist groups are looking to reform in northern Africa as U.S. drone strikes decimate their hideouts in Pakistan. Special operators also are conducting their traditional foreign internal defense mission and trying to stabilize sometimes shaky friendly governments.

Of course, SOF can’t do what they do without funding, so we look at how Special Operations fares in the proposed fiscal 2013 budget. Hint: a lot better than conventional forces. We also look at some of the latest, greatest SOF equipment. We include a report as well about Army Ranger combat field tests of the Rifleman Radio, one of the surviving pieces of the Joint Tactical Radio System.

And finally, back to Klika. You’ll learn a little more about this former Marine and current Army National Guardsman who has documented Special Operations missions around the globe. He helps the rest of us understand just a little better what you do.

We thank him, but especially, we thank you.

David Peabody PUBLISHER

Page 12: 2012 Spring Edition

By Elaine S. Povich

Senior Airman Jason Cunningham’s sacrifice lives on in the 10 wounded men he saved a decade ago in Afghanistan

Among Jason Cunningham’s last words were these: “I think I’m OK.”

Despite his intense medical train-ing as an Air Force pararescue jump-

er, he could not have been more wrong. Cunningham died from internal bleeding after being shot through the gut on the frigid and ordnance-riddled Takur Ghar mountaintop in Afghanistan in 2002. The 17-hour fight, known as the “Battle of Robert’s Ridge,” is still con-sidered one of the worst of the war, even 10 years later

But before the pararescueman died, he saved 10 American lives, braving intense weapon fire and an in-ferno in a helicopter crash, and dragging the wounded from the line of fire to relative safety at least three times. He crossed the live-fire line each time. For his heroism, he was awarded the Air Force Cross posthu-mously, the first pararescueman to receive the service’s second-highest military honor since the Vietnam War.

Six others died that day along with Cunningham, but everyone who was there says there would have been even more casualties without the actions by Cunning-ham. It was his first live-action mission -- and his last.

According to the citation for the Air Force Cross, Cunningham moved wounded troops to three casualty collection points as each was overrun. In addition to saving 10 lives, his actions “allowed the bodies of sev-

en fallen warriors to return home with honor.”The mission was something like the movie “Saving

Private Ryan,” but in this story Ryan didn’t make it home.

The story, according to military after-action re-ports and numerous articles in military publi-

cations, began at approximately 3 a.m. March 4 when an Army MH-47E Chinook helicopter dubbed “Razor 3” landed near a battlefield in Afghanistan. The crew’s mission was to call in airstrikes on al Qaeda fight-ers who had dug in near Takur Ghar mountain at the southern end of the Shah-e-Kot Valley, in an operation known as Operation Anaconda. The chopper came un-der heavy fire as soon as it landed and the pilot jerked it skyward, out of the fray. But as soon as it ascended, shouts came from the rear cargo area – “A guy’s out!” Somehow, a Navy SEAL, Petty Officer Neil Roberts, had fallen out. Razor 3 was too badly shot up to go back for the lost man, but the crew called in the inci-dent. Another Army MH-47E helicopter, carrying Cun-ningham and the rest of the crew, was sent in within hours to help, arriving at about dawn. Those who sur-vived Roberts Ridge would not know that Roberts had been killed by enemy fire, probably before they even began the rescue mission.

Page 13: 2012 Spring Edition

13Spr ing 2012 DEFENSE STANDARD

and his lastHis first rescue mission,

PHO

TO: U

.S. A

ir Fo

rce

Page 14: 2012 Spring Edition

14 DEFENSE STANDARD Spr ing 2012

The rescue situation turned bad almost immediately. The Chinook he-licopter, dubbed “Razor 1,” began taking heavy fire as it approached the mountain marking the landing zone. The helicopter pilot, Chief Warrant Officer Greg Calvert, was shot several times as bullets raked his chopper. He aborted the landing and was trying to retreat when the controls of the chopper failed and the Chinook crash-landed.

Then things really got bad.Enemy fire was piercing the Chinook, hitting the crew from every di-

rection. Men were wounded and screaming as hands and feet were blown off. Amid the chaos in the morning hours, Cunningham and the other members of the medical team went to work. Master Sgt. Cory Lamor-eaux, an Army special operations aviation regiment (SOAR) medic, tied off a bleeding artery in Calvert’s shattered arm. Cunningham checked the pulse of another and saw he was dead. He moved on to the next wounded man.

Then the firefight intensified as the enemy shooters tried to blow up the helicopter’s fuel tanks. Of the 21 men on the helicopter when it crashed, the two pilots and the mission commander were wounded; three others were already dead, and a half dozen were wounded.

Cunningham, according to the book Roberts Ridge: A story of Cour-age and Sacrifice on Takur Ghar Mountain, Afghanistan by Malcolm MacPherson, thought he was ready for this kind of scenario. He had trained hard and had persuaded his commanders to let him take whole blood to the battlefield. Whole blood can save lives, but is very perish-able and hard to transport under less-than-ideal conditions, like those in war. But he had whole blood with him that day. Some of it would be used on him.

It was when Cunningham and Lamoreaux tried to move some of the wounded away from the helicopter, which was still a magnet for incom-ing fire, that they were wounded. They each asked if the other was OK. Each assured the other that he was, but, in fact, both were badly wound-ed. Cunningham’s wounds were barely visible – the bullet went through his lower torso and pierced his liver. He was bleeding internally.

According to the account in the book, which is drawn from several ac-counts of the battle, Cunningham continued to minister to the wounded, even while he was battling his own wounds, only stopping when he be-came too weak to move. At the same time, he was assessing his own injury. His training must have shown him that it was bad. But he kept talking and advising others how to treat his wounds.

That kind of calm and soldierly demeanor was vintage Cunning-ham, according to his mother, Jackie Cunningham of Gallup,

N.M.“He always wanted to be a soldier,” she says. “Yes, always. We would

go camping, other kids would have hot dogs, he would eat MREs.”When he told his mother that he was going into the pararescue unit,

she wasn’t too worried. 9/11 hadn’t happened yet. The U.S. was at rela-tive peace. “When your kids reach a certain age, you gotta let them go,” she says. “I was so proud of him for wanting to go and do things.”

During his training, Cunningham apparently wanted to “do things” in a big way. He was always highly attentive to his training, according to military accounts, even in the grueling, two-year course it takes to be-

(From left to right) Tech. Sgt. Keary Miller, Senior Airman Jason Cun-ningham and Staff Sgt. Gabe Brown about three weeks before the battle. Behind them is a MH-47E, the same type of helicopter that took them to Takur Ghar.

PHO

TO: U

.S. A

ir Fo

rce

Page 15: 2012 Spring Edition

15Spr ing 2012 DEFENSE STANDARD

BORN: March 27, 1975, in Carlsbad, N.M.

DIED: March 4, 2002, in Afghanistan during the battle

of Takur Ghar, part of Operation Anaconda.

MILITARY UNIT AT TIME OF HIS DEATH: 38th Rescue

Squadron, Moody Air Force Base, Ga.

FAMILY: Parents Jackie and Lawrence “Red”

Cunningham, Gallup, N.M.; wife Theresa

Cunningham-Miller, daughters Kyla and Hanna.

EARLY YEARS: Grew up in Carlsbad, N.M.; attended

Carlsbad High School before graduating from

Farmington High School in May 1994.

SPORTS AND HOBBIES: Football, track and swimming;

all things military.

MILITARY BACKGROUND: Enlisted in the Navy in June

1994 and trained as an aviation boatswain’s mate,

but never served at sea. His first assignment was to

Naval Support Activities in Naples, Italy, where he

met Theresa de Castro, also an enlisted sailor. They

married in March 1996. He considered joining the

Navy SEALs and had passed the fitness test, but

decided he wanted to be a healer and enlisted

in the Air Force in April 1999 on a “delayed entry”

program. He completed pararescue training in June

2001.

DEPLOYMENTS: Deployed to Bagram Airfield,

Afghanistan, in February 2002.

HONORS: Received the Air Force Cross on Sept. 13,

2002, at Kirtland Air Force Base, N.M.; Purple Heart, Air

Force Meritorious Service Medal, Navy and Marine

Corps achievement medals, NATO Medal, Joint

Forces Medal, Blue Jacket of the Quarter award.

Senior AirmanJason D. Cunningham

Source: Defense Department

Gen. John P. Jumper, the then-Air force Chief of Staff, offers condolences to Cunningham’s wife, Theresa, during services at Arlington National Cemetery in March 2002. Cunningham, a pararescueman, was killed in action while supporting Operation Anaconda in Afghanistan.

Airmen from the 455th Air Expeditionary Wing unveil a newly restored Camp Cunningham sign at Bagram Airfield, Afghanistan, in June 2011. The camp was named in honor of Cunningham.

PHO

TO: T

ec

h. S

gt.

Ma

rk D

. Sm

ith

PHO

TO: S

en

ior A

irma

n S

he

ila d

eV

era

Page 16: 2012 Spring Edition

16 DEFENSE STANDARD Spr ing 2012

come a pararescueman. The washout rate is said to be as high as 90 percent. Cunningham excelled.

“Before he actually got into this class, he wanted to build his strength up so he got a rucksack that had 100 pounds in it and started working out with it,” says his best friend in training, Brandon, who did not want to use his full name for security reasons. “Our instructor saw this and made him use it throughout our training.”

For Cunningham, Brandon, and others like them, the 9/11 attacks were a call to duty that also included a little nervous excitement at the prospect of putting their training to practical use. “He (Cunningham) was definitely committed to the mission,” Brandon says. “The thing about Jason that made him such a great dude was that he was like any of us. He was dedicated to the things that were important to him -- the mission, the brotherhood, and his family.”

He died as he lived, always “giving 100 percent,” says Brandon, who describes Cunningham as his brother and best friend.

Maj. Joseph Barnard, director of operations for the 38th Rescue Squadron and Cunningham’s former flight commander, says Cunningham was the “type of guy you liked right away -- his energy, his attitude, the way

he handled himself.”Cunningham “knew his fate before everyone else,”

Barnard says. “Jason knew his wound was incompat-ible with survival without immediate surgery. But what he did in his last moments on this earth was simply extraordinary. He chose to continue to fight the enemy, he chose to continue to save the lives of his brothers, and he chose to epitomize service before self.”

Barnard says Cunningham’s example continues to inspire those following him in the pararescue corps, whose members call themselves PJs, short for para-jumpers.

“Jason’s sacrifice was ultimate, so when he and oth-ers have paid that price, it’s serious to us,” he says. “Jason’s actions were special because of the way he conducted himself in the face of oncoming tragedy. His passing is 10 years young; it’s tied to our current war and enemy. Jason’s ability and training was and remains a great motivator; it’s worthy of continual re-membrance. His example has become a pinnacle for new PJs to emulate.”

Up on that Afghanistan mountain 10 years ago, the weather through the day was frigid. The

Honorary pallbearers from the 38th Rescue Squadron at Moody Air Force Base, Ga., remove the flag-draped casket carrying the remains of Senior Airman Jason Cunningham during the graveside service at Arlington National Cemetery.

Page 17: 2012 Spring Edition

17Spr ing 2012 DEFENSE STANDARD

military command had determined that the landing zone was too “hot” with enemy fire to attempt another rescue until dark. The wounded were packed in helicopter insula-tion as some protection against the cold. But Cunningham was fading.

As morning turned into afternoon, the other members of the team did everything they could to keep Cunning-ham alive. They pumped in whole blood. They packed his wounds. They talked to him to try to keep him conscious. But eventually, he died, there on the mountain. Rescue would not come until darkness settled over the battlefield, 17 hours after Cunningham’s mission began.

Jackie Cunningham says she had a feeling in her gut that something bad had happened, even before she got the call. She was watching CNN, saw some news about a rescue mission in Afghanistan gone bad, and “I knew he was gone. He always told me ‘Mom, don’t worry unless they pull up in a white car.’ And they pulled up in a white car to the house.”

Jackie Cunningham says in the decade that has passed, she’s learned to live with the grief, though it’s never gone away. Some of the dedications and memorials to Jason have helped, though Jackie still believes Jason should have been awarded the Medal of Honor, the nation’s top military hon-

or. A dormitory at Sheppard Air Force Base in Texas was named in his honor in 2007 by a vote of the members of the 882nd Training Group. At the dedication, his widow, Air Force Lt. Theresa Cunningham-Miller, told the base newspaper that the naming shows that military members “don’t forget their own.” She attended the ceremony with her daughters, her new husband, Air Force Capt. Matthew Miller, an H-60 helicopter pilot, and the couple’s young son, Jackson.

“He’s our hero and always will be,” Cunningham-Miller said. “He’s even my husband’s hero,” she said, referring to Miller.

A marble monument in Cunningham’s honor was erected at Bagram Airfield in Afghanistan, with the compound offi-cially renamed Camp Cunningham. A street was named for him at Travis Air Force Base, Calif., in 2010.

And, in what may be the most fitting tribute, in 2009, 12 airmen from Lackland Air Force Base in Texas held an 824-mile memorial rucksack march in honor of Cunning-ham and other fallen teammates. Marching in teams of two, each team walked approximately 150 miles during the 11-day trek, each man carrying a 50-pound rucksack.

One has to believe that Cunningham would have made it an even 100 pounds.

The President of the United States of America, authorized by Title 10, Section 8742, U.S.C.,

awards the Air Force Cross to Senior Airman Jason D. Cunningham for extraordinary

heroism in military operations against an opposing armed force while serving as a

pararescueman near the village of Marzak in the Paktia Province of Afghanistan on 4

March 2002. On that proud day, Airman Cunningham was the primary Air Force Combat

Search and Rescue medic assigned to a Quick Reaction Force tasked to recover two American

servicemen evading capture in austere terrain occupied by massed Al Qaida and Taliban forces. Shortly

before landing, his MH-47E helicopter received accurate rocket-propelled grenade and small arms fire, severely

disabling the aircraft and causing it to crash land. The assault force formed a hasty defense and immediately

suffered three fatalities and five critical casualties. Despite effective enemy fire, and at great risk to his own

life, Airman Cunningham remained in the burning fuselage of the aircraft in order to treat the wounded.

As he moved his patients to a more secure location, mortar rounds began to impact within fifty feet of his

position. Disregarding this extreme danger, he continued the movement and exposed himself to enemy fire

on seven separate occasions. When the second casualty collection point was also compromised, in a display

of uncommon valor and gallantry, Airman Cunningham braved an intense small arms and rocket-propelled

grenade attack while repositioning the critically wounded to a third collection point. Even after he was mortally

wounded and quickly deteriorating, he continued to direct patient movement and transferred care to another

medic. In the end, his distinct efforts led to the successful delivery of ten gravely wounded Americans to life-

saving medical treatment. Through his extraordinary heroism, superb airmanship, aggressiveness in the face of

the enemy, and in the dedication of his service to his country, Senior Airman Cunningham reflected the highest

credit upon himself and the United States Air Force.

Citation, Air Force Cross

J

Page 18: 2012 Spring Edition

Their missions rarely makes headlines, though when they

do the accounts are typically dramatic: Arch terrorist Osa-ma bin Laden killed last year in his secret compound in a daring night raid in Pakistan; two Western hostages rescued last January from a pirate’s den in Somalia; Umbra Jumdail,

leader of the al Qaeda-linked Abu Sayyaf terrorist group, killed in February in the Philippines.

In any given year Special Operations Forces can make their way to one of a hundred different countries, targeting terrorists and insurgents, training and advising local secu-rity forces, conducting exercises, and engaging in humani-tarian and disaster relief missions. Such unconventional missions have been the core business of Special Operations since its inception, and ever since the 9/11 terrorist attacks, business has been good. As the wars in Iraq and Afghani-stan wind down, reliance on Special Operations Forces and their unique operational skills will only increase.

The recent release of U.S. Special Operations Com-mand’s (USSOCOM) budget is of interest precisely

because it provides evidence of that shift, which has profound strategic implications. For a command

that is often shrouded in secrecy, for instance, the budgetary numbers reveal that Special

Operations Forces are a rare bright spot in an overall declining Defense Depart-

ment budget. Consider that even as it prepares to cut up to 100,000 U.S. ground forces, the Pentagon will increase Special Operations Forc-es from roughly 66,100 troops today (up from 48,000 in fiscal 2007) to 71,000 by 2015.

Long after combat troops leave Afghanistan, increased numbers of U.S. Special Opera-tions Forces will almost certainly stay behind to help Afghan secu-rity forces keep al Qaeda and the Taliban at bay. Meanwhile, as it has wound down manpower-in-tensive and costly counterinsur-gency wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the Obama administration has shown a strong predilection for discreet targeted operations and an emphasis on training lo-

Special Operations Forces to grow in size and capability as conventional forces scrap for declining dollars

By James Kitfield

18 DEFENSE STANDARD Spr ing 2012SBudget Battles

PHO

TO: S

gt.

Eric

J. G

lass

ey

Page 19: 2012 Spring Edition

19Spr ing 2012 DEFENSE STANDARD

JOIN THEFAMILY UNIT!

Uni�cation Navigation InspirationTransformation

N IU TN IU Tfamily

Partnering to Improve the Lives of Military Families

sAve on Brands!

RegIsTeRfor a Family Unit

coupon book

vIsIT www.FamilyUnitPG.com

Page 20: 2012 Spring Edition

cal security forces that are the stock-in-trade for Special Operations. In fact, numerous experts believe that model -- intelligence-driven counterterrorist op-erations coupled with empowerment of local security forces -- will increasingly come to define 21st-century warfare for a United States wearied by a decade of manpower-intensive counterinsurgen-cy and nation-building operations.

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Gen. Martin Dempsey talks about facing a “strategic inflection point,” as the Unit-ed States is increasingly challenged by transnational terrorists, insurgents, criminal cartels and nation-state prox-ies.

“The global security environment presents an increasingly complex set of challenges and opportunities. By their very nature, Special Operations Forces are particularly well-suited to respond to this rapidly changing environment, and I fully expect the op-erational demands placed on SOF to increase across the next de-cade, and beyond,” Adm. William McRaven, commander of U.S. Special Operations Command, testified in March before the Senate Armed Services Committee. “The decade of war after 9/11 has proffered many lessons; among them, specific to Special Opera-tions Forces, is the complimentary nature of our direct and indirect approaches, and how they are aligned to this changing strategic environment.”

In terms of the overall defense budget, Special Operations Forces remain a relative mouse that roars. Special Operations

Command’s fiscal 2013 budget request of $10.4 billion represents just 1.7 percent of the overall proposed DoD budget, for instance. Even when capabilities provided to SOF by the individual services are added in, they represent only a 4 percent slice of the total DoD pie. Of that total budget of $10.4 billion, $2.6 billion covers “Over-seas Contingency Operations,” notably in Afghanistan.

After 9/11 Special Operations Forces were given the primary counter-terrorist mission, and the budgetary numbers reveal how the demands of the SOF “direct approach” of targeting terrorists translates into equipment and enablers such as specially outfitted helicopters, aircraft and boats. SOCOM’s fiscal 2013 budget re-quest thus includes service life extensions and upgrades to a fleet of heavy-lift, MH-47G Chinook helicopters that will number 69 by 2015. The command is likewise upgrading its fleet of smaller, MH-

60 Nighthawk helicopters, with 12 of the new MH-60M models delivered to date.

The budget also includes funds for purchasing CV-22 Osprey tilt-rotor aircraft that can land and take off like a helicopter yet fly at the speeds of a fixed-wing aircraft, with 23 of a planned 50 aircraft fleet already delivered. In terms of its primary fixed-wing aircraft, SOCOM is also in the process of upgrading its fleet of heavily armed AC-130 ground-attack aircraft, and MC-130 transport air-craft, with a new Precision Strike Package that has already proven itself in combat. The budget also includes funds for a “Non-Stan-dard Aviation Program” which likely includes stealth helicopters of the type that crashed at Osama bin Laden’s Abbottabad complex.

To deploy Navy SEAL (Sea, Air Land) commandoes from the sea, SOCOM recently awarded prototype development con-tracts for a new Combat Craft-Medium, a replacement for the Naval Special Warfare Rigid Hull Inflatable Boat currently in use. Congress has already provided funds for SOCOM to purchase 24 High Speed Assault Craft as a critical “bridge” between the two programs.

Anyone who has spent time in war zones such as Iraq and Af-ghanistan can attest to SOF’s varied fleet of ground vehicles, from all-terrain vehicles to specially outfitted SUVs. The new budget includes funds for the Non-Standard Commercial Vehicle, for instance, a “low-profile commercial vehicle” modified with pro-tective armor and advanced communications equipment to allow Special Operations Forces to “operate non-obtrusively supporting a host of SOF missions.” The command is also purchasing a new Ground Mobility Vehicle that can deploy inside a CH-47 Chinook helicopter.

In keeping with its evolving “network centric” model of coun-

20 DEFENSE STANDARD Spr ing 2012

U.S. Special Operations Command’s fiscal 2013 budget request includes $2.6 billion for overseas contingency operations, primarily Afghanistan, and money to upgrade MH-47G Chinook helicopters.

PHO

TO: S

gt.

Eric

J. G

lass

ey

Page 21: 2012 Spring Edition

21Spr ing 2012 DEFENSE STANDARD

© 2012 Rockwell Collins. All rights reserved.

Every day, military personnel worldwide count on Rockwell Collins to provide the technology UAVs require to

effectively operate in manned and unmanned airspace. From advanced flight control, navigation, communication,

and sensor systems to a worldwide support network, we provide the critical solutions the military needs to

successfully complete its missions. To learn more, visit rockwellcollins.com/rely.

RC_UAV Ad_Def Std Qtrly_March2012.indd 1 2/17/12 8:12 AM

Page 22: 2012 Spring Edition

terterrorism operations emphasizing rapid exploitation of advanced intel-ligence, surveillance and reconnais-sance (ISR) systems, SOCOM’s budget includes a host of new ISR and communications systems. These include a SOF-developed family of Wide Band Satellite Com-munications Systems that provide assured access to the command’s secure voice, data and video ser-vices worldwide; unmanned drones carrying advanced surveillance sen-sors; and advanced high-definition video surveillance systems.

Those systems are the enablers behind the headlines. They are also an integral part of the United States’ ability to successfully target fully half of al Qaeda’s top 20 leaders in just the last year. “In today’s global counterterrorism fight, U.S. Special Operations Forces continue to degrade al Qaeda and its affiliates’ leadership around the world, greatly reducing their ability to effectively plan and conduct operations,” McRaven testified, defending his bud-get request. “Extreme in risk, precise in execution and able to deliver a high payoff, the impacts of the direct approach are im-mediate, visible to the public and have had tremendous effects on our enemies’ networks throughout the decade.”

While the targeted terrorist killings of the “direct ap-proach” are essential to keeping the enemy off bal-

ance, SOCOM sees them only as an adjunct to a more long-term and sustainable “indirect approach” that includes empowering host-nation forces with training, advice and access to advanced ISR systems; providing assistance to humanitarian agencies; and engaging local populations. The budget backs up that claim.

Congress has extended through 2015 SOCOM’s “1208” au-thority to work with indigenous forces engaged in counterterror-ism operations around the world, for instance, and it approved increasing the funding cap of $50 million for the program in 2012. Elements of this program include 22 Military Information Support Teams and four Regional Information Support Teams, which augment the public diplomacy capability of local embas-sies. Special Operations Civil Affairs elements also operate in Afghanistan, Africa and the Philippines, and are manned by ex-tensively trained and educated cultural experts who reach out to local populaces (so popular is this capability that SOCOM add-

ed a fifth Civil Affairs battalion in 2012). SOF also participate in civil-military support teams that provide humanitarian or disas-ter assistance. There work in 17 countries today is expected to expand to 20 countries in fiscal 2013, and 30 countries by 2017.

Nowhere do the synergies of SOCOM’s “direct” and “indi-rect” approaches come together to greater effect than in Afghani-stan. Special Operations Forces continue to target Taliban and al Qaeda leadership, increasingly with Afghan special forces in the lead. SOCOM has deployed an entire SOF headquarters to Af-ghanistan in support of that ongoing mission. Along with having the lead in counterterrorism operations in-country, SOF also has taken primary responsibility for “village stability operations,” recruiting and training 11,000 Afghan local police to provide a bulwark against Taliban intimidation in 57 local districts. SOF teams in Afghanistan now also frequently include Cultural Sup-port Teams, which are filled by U.S. women. They are steeped in the local culture and language, and can interact with Afghan women normally barred by strict Islamic culture from talking to male SOF personnel.

“While the ‘direct approach’ will remain a hallmark capabil-ity for Special Operations Forces in order to disrupt the threat, it alone is not the solution to the challenges our nation faces today, because it ultimately only buys time and space for the ‘indirect approach’ and broader governmental elements to take effect,” says McRaven, referring to the empowerment of host nation forces, humanitarian aid and engagement with local peoples. As for the future, he notes that the indirect approach builds relation-ships and alliances that are the critical link denying sanctuary to adversaries. “Through this network of relationships, SOF can provide a hedge against strategic surprise by identifying and working preemptively to address problems before they become conflicts.”

22 DEFENSE STANDARD Spr ing 2012

The CV-22 Osprey continues to be an important component of the Special Operations budget,

with USSOCOM requesting continued funding to build a fleet

of 50 tilt-rotor aircraft.

PHO

TO: S

taff

Sg

t. M

ich

ae

l B. K

elle

r

J

Page 23: 2012 Spring Edition

We were there when you landed on the northern coast of France.

We were there when you returned to the Philippine shore.

We were there when you fought in Korea and Vietnam.

We were there when you rolled across the deserts of Iraq.

We were there then. We will always be there.

Serving the insurance needs of the Military since 1936.

Some discounts, coverages, payment plans, and features are not available in all states or in all GEICO companies. Homeowners, renters, and boat coverages are written through non-affiliated insurance companies and are secured through the GEICO Insurance Agency Inc. Motorcycle coverage is underwritten by GEICO Indemnity Company. GEICO is a registered service mark of Government Employees Insurance Company, Washington, D.C. 20076; a Berkshire Hathaway Inc. subsidiary. © 2011 GEICO

1-800-MILITARY (1-800-645-4827) or your local GEICO office.

AuTO H hOME H REnTERs

MOTORCYCLE H BOAT

Page 24: 2012 Spring Edition

24 DEFENSE STANDARD Spr ing 2012

By John Pulley

Spec Ops in Africa

On the evening of Jan. 24, President Obama inched his way through a throng of Washington’s power elite, shaking hands with lawmakers and colleagues who had gathered in

the House chamber of the U.S. Capitol to hear the president deliver the annual State of the Union address. Reaching his secretary of defense, Leon Panetta, the president paused and offered congratulations.

“Leon, good job tonight,” the president said, his remarks captured by live mi-crophones. “Good job tonight.”

Hours before the world would understand the meaning of that exchange, the secretary and the president tacitly acknowledged a successful hostage-rescue mission executed that evening by U.S. Special Operations forces in Somalia. As the president made his way to the lectern, elite troops who had just freed an American citizen and her Danish colleague were still mopping up after the mission.

The daring rescue and its acknowledgement by the Defense Department and the White House the following day focused renewed attention on Special Operations Forces operating on the Afri-can continent, a military contingent whose profile has grown in recent years. In the past decade, Africa has evolved from an afterthought of American security and national interests to an area of intense concern. Increasingly, defense experts are viewing the use of Special Operations Forces in Africa as a cost-effective, politically acceptable means for looking after American interests on the continent.

“As long as there is a major threat to the U.S. homeland from groups operating in places like Somalia and Yemen, combined with a political inability to send in large numbers of American forces, dealing with this kind of threat is ripe for only one kind of U.S.

Daring hostage rescue in

Somalia shines light on

small, but growing, presence

inAfricaSPECIAL OPERATIONS

Page 25: 2012 Spring Edition

ultimate warrior approved

Page 26: 2012 Spring Edition

26 DEFENSE STANDARD Spr ing 2012

military force, and that is Special Operations,” says Seth G. Jones, a senior political scientist at the RAND Corp. and a former rep-resentative for the commander of U.S. Special Operations Com-mand to the assistant secretary of defense for special operations. “I don’t see their operations tempo declining in North Africa or East Africa any time in the foreseeable future. “It could increase.”

The surgical precision with which the Special Operations team executed the hostage rescue in Somalia illustrates

why elite troops are invaluable in Africa. On the night of the rescue, a team of commandoes from dif-

ferent branches of the military parachuted from airplanes into an area near where the hostages were being held, according to press accounts. The team included members of SEAL Team 6, the Navy unit that had killed Osama bin Laden in Pakistan the previous May. The rescuers hiked about two miles in the dark to a com-pound where gunmen with access to nearby explosives held the two international aid workers, Jessica Buchanan, an American, and her Danish colleague, Paul Thisted. Armed kidnappers had abducted them Oct. 25 near Galcayo, Somalia, and were holding them for ransom.

The rescue team took and returned fire, killing nine abductors. None of the rescuers was killed or injured. Helicopters spirited the freed hostages onto waiting helicopters and on to safety in Djibou-ti, presumably to Camp Lemonnier, the primary base of operations for U.S. Africa Command in the Horn of Africa.

President Obama praised “the extraordinary courage and ca-pabilities of our Special Operations Forces.” Indeed, at a time of budget constraints at the Pentagon, the Obama administration favors an enhanced role for Special Operations. “As we reduce

the overall defense budget, we will protect, and in some cases increase, our investments in Special Operations forces,” Panetta said earlier this year. Not only do such forces pro-vide more bang for the buck than the over-whelming blunt force of traditional troops, Special Operations appears particularly well suited to the political and logistical challeng-es of Africa.

According to a March 23 report by the Congressional Research Service, “U.S. Special Operations Forces (SOF): Background and Issues for Congress,” U.S. Special Op-erations Command “is seeking expanded authority to deploy and position SOF and their equipment in an effort to achieve greater autonomy and increase presence in … Africa” and elsewhere.

Last October, about two weeks before the hostages were ab-ducted, the president authorized deployment of 100 troops, pri-marily Special Ops forces, to central Africa. Their mission, which continues, is to expedite the capture or killing of Joseph Kony, the notorious leader of the Lord’s Resistance Army, which for de-cades has terrorized central Africa, murdering citizens and exploit-ing children whom it has forced to bear arms and work in the sex trade. To that end, the Americans are training local militaries in Uganda, the Central African Republic, the Democratic Republic of Congo and South Sudan.

Among other known threats in Africa are Al-Shabaab, an Islamist militia with links to al Qaeda; al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), which is primarily active in the north and west of the continent; and Boko Haram, which bombed the U.N. head-quarters in the Nigerian capital, Abuja, last year.

Large swaths of Africa are marked by political unrest and ever-shifting alliances, making it a fluid and slippery environment in which to gain a solid footing. The four major geographic areas of concern for Special Operation Forces Africa, part of U.S. Africa Command, are the Horn of Africa, northwest Africa, the Gulf of Guinea and a catchall category referred to as “the rest of Africa.” Political instability and ungoverned spaces bedevil the region. Somalia and other parts of the continent are essentially lawless vacuums of authority, fertile ground for the proliferation of pi-

Spec Ops in Africa

SEALs deployed in support of Combined Joint Task Force Horn of Africa hit the ground after practicing special-purpose insertion and extraction techniques on an HH-60 helicopter.

Sta

ff S

gt.

Ma

tth

ew

Ha

nn

en

Page 27: 2012 Spring Edition

Used By:

Aspen Water, Inc. The most Versatile Water Purification Systems On Earth

Contact: [email protected]: 972-889-9500

www.AspenWater.com

VIPIR™VIPIR™

STEALTH ILLUMINATOR™STEALTH ILLUMINATOR™

GUARDIAN™GUARDIAN™

LAZER STIK™LAZER STIK™

UNIVERSAL DIGITAL REMOTE CONTROL™

UNIVERSAL DIGITAL REMOTE CONTROL™

®

The world’s most complete and trusted line ofbattle tested IR & visual beacons, illuminators

and remote lighting systems

INQUIRIES PLEASE CONTACT:[email protected]

T. 514 694 8477 • F. 514 694 2353www.adventurelights.com

VISIT US AT SOFIC BOOTH 1952

AL ad 1-2pg 5.5x4-11-04 Press.pdf 1 4/13/11 3:29 PM

Page 28: 2012 Spring Edition

28 DEFENSE STANDARD Spr ing 2012

rates, drug traffickers, international terrorists and other criminal enter-prises.

Countering pirates is largely the provenance of conventional forces, but Special Operations troops have intervened to defuse crises caused by pirates. In 2009, Navy SEAL snipers killed three pirates who had seized the cargo ship Maersk Alabama and taken its captain hostage. It was the first seizure by pirates of a ship flying under the American flag since the early 19th century.

R elying on Special Operations to promote American inter-ests in Africa is a relatively recent strategy. For more than

half a century after World War II, the United States defined Africa primarily as a recipient of humanitarian aid. The 1993 Battle of Mogadishu debacle, which inspired the Black Hawk Down: A Sto-ry of Modern Warfare book and movie, began as a humanitarian mission. As recently as a dozen years ago, politicians and policy analysts in the United States had declared Africa to be of little or no concern, either strategically or in terms of national security.

Sept. 11, 2001, marked a profound shift in thinking. Subse-quent geopolitical trends have further redefined Africa’s impor-tance to the security of the United States and its national interests. Rich in natural resources, the continent provides as much oil to the United States as do Persian Gulf countries.

Yet the United States’ strategic interests in Africa go well be-yond what is extracted from African soil, says J. Peter Pham, di-rector of the Atlantic Council’s Michael S. Ansari Africa Center. The continent has a fast-growing population and booming eco-nomic growth, including six or seven of the world’s fastest-grow-ing economies. Within a few decades, Africa will become home to approximately 20 percent of the global population. The continent is close enough to Europe to affect the security of U.S. allies there.

And should a conflict impede the flow of oil from the Persian

Gulf through the Strait of Hormuz, it would be imperative that oil tankers continue to pass through the Gulf of Aden off the coast of Somalia. Meanwhile, China is attempting to establish influence in Africa, not to mention India, Brazil and other emerging powers that seek to be players on the continent.

“It’s in our national interest to begin viewing Africa in terms of security, natural resources and economic opportunity,” says Pham, acknowledging that realities on the ground shift frequently. “It’s not black and white. It’s exactly the type of situation where the training [of Special Operations Forces], the capacity for un-derstanding nuance and operating unconventionally certainly are skills that are very useful.”

In light of those shifting economic and political threats, U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) separated from European Com-mand in 2008 to become a freestanding combatant command. As part of the realignment, Special Operations Command Africa (SO-CAFRICA) was stood up as a functional sub-unified command for AFRICOM, both based in Stuttgart, Germany.

With the formation of SOCAFRICA, the command gained authority of the Special Operations Command and Control Ele-ment – Horn of Africa – which supplied the 100 special opera-tors involved in the Kony training mission. SOCAFRICA later absorbed the Joint Special Operations Task Force Trans–Sahara (JSOTFTS).

Officials at SOCAFRICA did not immediately respond to re-quests to discuss their organization and operations.

The primary focus of Special Operations on the continent is foreign internal defense, which involves training local mili-

Spec Ops in Africa

A Senegalese army company marches past the official party following a recent special operations joint exercise in Theis, Senegal. U.S. Africa Command sponsors exercises with several partner nations in north and west Africa to build miitary interoperability and improve the skills of friendly special operations forces.

PHOTO: Master Sgt. Jeremiah Erickson

Page 29: 2012 Spring Edition

Concertainer from HESCO.Providing dependable protectionwherever you are.Acknowledged as the most significant development in field fortification sincethe Second World War, Concertainer® units from HESCO® have become thebenchmark in force protection.

Whether used to define boundaries or as a protective barrier, Concertainerunits have been employed to safeguard personnel, vehicles, equipment,facilities and other critical assets.

www.hesco.com

HESCO and Concertainer are registered® trade marks of Hesco Bastion Limited

Photograph courtesy US DoD/SGT Artur Shvartsberg

HESCO Ad Def Standard July 2011.qxd:Layout 1 1/8/11 16:12 Page 1

Page 30: 2012 Spring Edition

30 DEFENSE STANDARD Spr ing 2012

tary forces, thereby denying safe havens to terror-ists, extremists and outlaws. That training involves intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, as well as tactics for conducting raids against en-emies. “It’s more than shooting a gun,” says Jones. “It’s sophisticated tactical operations.”

Special Operations Forces also target and kill known terrorists. Saleh Ali Saleh Nabham, a senior al Qaeda leader, died in a 2009 Special Operations raid in southern Somalia. Senior defense and in-telligence leaders, among them Panetta, have said that al Qaeda’s demise in Pakistan has shifted the terrorist network’s attention to Africa. James Clap-per, the director of national intelligence, testified to Congress that “absent more effective and sustained activities to disrupt them, some regional affiliates, particularly al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula and al-Shabaab in Somalia, probably will grow stron-ger.”

The African strategy, for now, is to leverage rel-atively small numbers of Special Operations forces as a primary means for stabilizing the continent’s hot spots, and jump-starting economic develop-ment in underdeveloped regions. The alternative is continued instability and growing threats to U.S. interests and security.

Determining the number of U.S. Special Opera-tions Forces in Africa is all but impossible. Pham has estimated fewer than 200, but John Pike, direc-tor of GlobalSecurity.org, suggests that “the actual numbers are substantially greater” than DoD will acknowledge. He also suspects the CIA provides significant numbers of irregu-lar commandos.

However many special operators are there, the need for them is expected to grow.

“If [the threat to U.S. interests in Africa is] left unaddressed you could have a network that ranges from East Africa through the center and into the Sahel and Maghreb, and that I think that would be very, very worrying,” Army Gen. Carter Ham, com-mander of AFRICOM, told defense writers in September, accord-ing to an account published by Stars and Stripes. “I’d like more Special Operations Forces now.”

Having endured a decade of brutal war against an entrenched

enemy in Afghanistan, the military is eager to avoid a similar sce-nario in Africa.

“AFRICOM is at the cutting edge of a significant problem set,” says Air Force Col. Richard Samuels, deputy commander of SO-CAFRICA, in a January webcast posted online by the Institute for Defense and Government Advancement. “If we don’t do anything about it now, it’s going to be a more significant problem later.”

Special Operations’ unique capabilities are ideal in such an en-vironment, he indicates.

“If we can get in there with a very small, light, lean footprint now, we will probably be able to shape the future in such a way that it’s less violent, more secure for the populace and eventually well-governed,” he says. “But we need to get after that now. We can’t wait until the safe haven has been established.”

Spec Ops in Africa

U.S. service members from U.S. Special Operations Command Africa conduct parachute training near the command’s headquarters in Stuttgart, Germany.

PHO

TO: M

art

in G

ree

son

J

Page 31: 2012 Spring Edition
Page 32: 2012 Spring Edition

The U.S. Navy wants to position mine-clearing, Special Operations and intelligence-gathering forces closer to the action, so it is looking at turning

ships into floating bases.The ships can be moved into position quickly, they

don’t require expensive infrastructure, and they don’t need a friendly host nation as a home base. Once in place, the floating bases can host helicopters, unmanned systems and

smaller boats.In a recently unveiled plan, the Navy says it wants to take its Mobile Landing

Platform transport ship, add a flight deck, command-and-control equipment and storage for boats and mine-hunting equipment, and call

it a floating base. The Navy

hopes to build two of these new Afloat Forward Staging Bases (AFSBs) – enough to provide what Navy Secretary Ray Mabus calls “continuous AFSB support anywhere in the world.”

But it could take four years to field the first ship. In the meantime, the Navy is diverting the USS Ponce transport ship from retirement to serve as a bridge vessel to the new AFSB. The Ponce (pronounced “PON-SAY”) already has a helicopter flight deck, which will serve as “a lily pad” for Sikorsky MH-53 minesweepers, says Adm. John Harvey, head of U.S. Fleet Forces Command.

The Ponce, the last of 12 Austin-class ships, will also resupply mine countermeasure ships, Harvey adds. The Ponce has a well deck, which, when filled with water, allows boats to drive into the ship to pick up and drop off people and equipment.

By Marc Selinger

32 DEFENSE STANDARD Spr ing 2012

Base InstinctsNavy gets a jump-start oN

loNg-term plaN for floatiNg

forward stagiNg bases

Artist’s rendering of a Mobile Landing Platform. The Navy wants to convert two of the platforms to Afloat Forward Staging Bases.

PHO

TO: G

en

era

l Dyn

am

ics

/ N

ass

co

Page 33: 2012 Spring Edition
Page 34: 2012 Spring Edition

34 DEFENSE STANDARD Spr ing 2012

The Ponce will “fulfill a long-standing request” for a floating base in U.S. Central Command’s area of responsibility, the

Navy says. Central Command’s scope spans 20 countries, including such hotbeds as Iran, Iraq, Pakistan, Syria and Yemen.

The Center for Strategic and International Studies says having anti-mine capabilities on floating bases could be particularly useful in a conflict with Iran, which could lay mines across a wide area to limit the movement of U.S. and allied naval forces and impede commercial shipping in the Persian Gulf.

“Iran has a considerable capacity to lay mines,” including “a stock of some 2,000 to 3,000 naval mines,” the center says in a report.

The United States and its Gulf allies currently have “limited” assets to deal with such a threat, which helps explain why the United States has rushed to deploy the Ponce “mother ship” to the Gulf to support mine warfare, the report continues.

Lexington Institute analyst Dan Goure says the Navy’s floating-base plan will also help free up “highly valuable” aircraft carriers and large-deck amphibious assault ships for other missions.

Navy spokeswoman Lt. Katie Cerezo says the Ponce and the two new AFSBs will all support three mission sets:

• Access, or minimizing the need to obtain permission from host nations to conduct missions from their land.

• Reach, which is achieved by supporting rotary wing, unmanned

A U.S. Customs and Border Protection officer watches as a Marine Humvee is driven off the amphibious transport dock ship USS Ponce in Morehead City, N.C., last year. The Ponce is being repurposed as a floating forward staging base as the Navy builds two new ships specifically for that mission.

PHO

TO: M

ass

Co

mm

un

ica

tion

Sp

ec

ialis

t 1s

t C

lass

Na

tha

na

el M

ille

r

Base Instincts

fischer UltiMateTM Military Connectors Line

Secure Connections for UltiMate Protection

New Original SeriesCompact, Rugged, Lightweight

■ Excellent sealing IP68/69K even unmated

■ Rugged design for harsh environment

■ Extremely robust mechanical keying

■ Miniature and ultralight design

■ Push-pull locking or emergency release system

■ EMC 360° high performance shielding

■ High shock and vibration resistance

■ 10,000 mating cycles

■ Wide range of configurations

■ Easy Fischer cable assembly solutions

www.fischerconnectors.com

United States and CanadaFischer Connectors [email protected]

ND_US_3_468x10_3inches_b0_04_12.indd 1 18.04.12 15:36

Page 35: 2012 Spring Edition

Weapon Mounting Systems Land & SeaSwing Arm Mounting Systems Land & Sea Lasers & Illuminators Machine Guns & Individual Weapons Weapon Lubricants & Cleaners Machine Guns, Individual Weapons & Military Lenses

Testing Product Pull Testing Live FireConsulting Weapon Systems Integration Vehicular Programs Combat Load PlansMIL-SPEC Packaging Radio Frequency Identification

Medium Machine Gun Light

In battle field conditions when the weather and the elements are against you, it is a time for your weapon to be on your side. The PRi PRi Gas Buster® is a safety device that will tame the blowback from the M16 and M4 that can blind your shooting eye or dirty your glasses.

419.629.2603 pri-mounts.comPRi is a manufacturer of a full line of tactical shooting products.

PRECISION REFLEX, INC.

Page 36: 2012 Spring Edition

36 DEFENSE STANDARD Spr ing 2012

systems and combat craft near their areas of operations.• Persistence, in which forces can operate for longer periods

of time by being resupplied while they’re conducting missions.“Both platforms will provide similar capabilities important to

AFSB operations, but will achieve them by different means and to varying degrees,” Cerezo says. “For example, the Ponce has a well deck to support launch and recovery of boats, whereas the [new AFSBs] will leverage a crane.”

Built by now-defunct Lockheed Shipbuilding, the 42-year-old Ponce supported the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq

and the 2011 NATO airstrikes over Libya. To prepare the ship for its new role, MHI Ship Repair & Services of Norfolk, Va., made a host of upgrades under the $5.8 million contract, including updating bridge and propulsion equipment. The Ponce is expected to have a crew of about 200 sailors and civil service mariners.

Navy officials deny media reports that the Ponce’s primary purpose is for Special Operations, insisting the primary mission is supporting mine warfare. “It’s not going over there as a Special Operating Forces death star Galactica coming through the Gulf,” Harvey says.

For the longer-term solution, the Navy is asking Congress to approve converting two brand-new Mobile Landing Platforms to AFSBs. Roughly the length of two-and-a-half football fields, the new AFSB is based on a British Petroleum tanker design. It will include a flight deck with two helicopter operating spots, an aviation maintenance hangar, additional aircraft parking, and a flight operations control station. It will also have storage for boats and mine-hunting equipment, Cerezo says.

General Dynamics is slated to begin building the first new AFSB in early 2013. It will be named after Lt. Gen. Lewis “Chesty” Puller, the most decorated Marine in history. Scheduling and naming decisions had not been announced for the second new floating base as of mid-April.

The two new AFSBs, along with the two Mobile Landing Platforms that won’t be converted, “will alleviate demands on an already stressed surface combatant and amphibious fleet while reducing our reliance on shore-based infrastructure,” Mabus says. The Navy expects the AFSBs to have a “larger cost” than the Mobile Landing Platforms but did not elaborate.

The Ponce is scheduled to deploy to the Persian Gulf this summer and remain on station until it is relieved by the first new AFSB in 2016. In a request for Ponce volunteers, the Navy calls the assignment a chance to be on the “leading edge” of a new program.

Says Capt. Cynthia Womble, a Navy personnel official, “This really is an excellent opportunity for sailors to step out of their comfort zone and be a part of something really unique.”

Sailors prepare to lower the American flag at sunset on board the USS Ponce at Naval Station Rota, Spain, before the Ponce was saved from retirement for a new mission as a temporary forward staging base. The repurposed Ponce is expected to deploy to the Persian Gulf this summer.

PHO

TO: M

ass

Co

mm

un

ica

tion

Sp

ec

ialis

t 1s

t C

lass

Na

tha

na

el M

ille

r

J

Base Instincts

Page 37: 2012 Spring Edition
Page 38: 2012 Spring Edition

H i g h - P r e s s u r e J o bAir Force Special Operations weather teams go

commando on forecastingBy Tony Mecia

When Master Sgt. David McKinney tells people that he forecasts weather for the Air Force, they get that. They figure he holes up in an office some-

where, analyzing radar images so the Air Force’s planes and he-licopters can avoid storms.

But when he tells people his job also involves parachuting into enemy territory and carrying weapons, well, that often leaves them scratching their heads.

McKinney is part of a small but growing group of airmen who juggle the dual roles of weather geek and Special Opera-tions warrior. That can seem like an odd combination for people accustomed to seeing their meteorologists on television yukking it up behind the safety of a news desk. But on the battlefield, accurately forecasting the weather can play a vital role in the success of a mission, or even spell the difference between life and death. Those forecasts still depend on human observations, especially in hot spots around the world unaccustomed to col-lecting weather information – places such as Afghanistan and parts of Africa.

“The amount of weather data coming out of those coun-tries ranges from slim to none,” says Maj. John Syc, direc-tor of operations with the Air Force’s 10th Combat Weath-er Squadron at Hurlburt Field in Florida. The squadron is composed of about 60 men – and they are men, as the nature of the job has not prompted the Air Force to open it to women – who de-ploy primarily with Army and Air Force Special Op-erations units to provide insight on the weather. Outside of

the 10th Combat Weather Squadron, another 100 or so airmen have similar training and provide those services to their units.

Like many Special Operations forces, the Air Force’s weather team is stepping up recruitment and growing. The Air Force re-cently made joining Special Operations weather easier by allow-ing airmen to enlist specifically for that job. Previously, the Air Force took meteorologists from other units and then trained them in special operations.

One of the more common missions for Special Op-erations weather team members is help-

ing aircraft crew perform their missions. From the

38 DEFENSE STANDARD Spr ing 2012

A member of the Special Operations weather team checks wind readings in a sandstorm during a Special Forces mission in Afghanistan. Air Force Special Operations weatherman is the only military career field that provides meteorological data in support of Special Forces missions.

PHO

TO: A

ir Fo

rce

Sp

ec

ial O

pe

ratio

ns

Co

mm

an

d

Page 39: 2012 Spring Edition

Fiber Advantages over Copper: lower cost, lighter, faster, stronger

Fiber Optical LAN128 Users (Voice/Video/Data)

Conventional Cables128 Users(Voice/Data)

GreenTechnologies

Optical LAN – GPON (Gigabit Passive Optical Networking)The Architectural Choice for Eco-friendly, Low Cost, High Performance Networks

Security: ACLs, TLS Encryption, PAC, 802.1x/RADIUS Authentication

Compatible with NSTSSI-7003 Compliant Alarmed Fiber PDS for SIPR

Leverages JITC Certified devices

Ethernet Standards and Functionality: VLANs, QoS, bridging

Convergence: bi-directional Voice, Video, Data on a single fiber

99.999% Availability: Carrier Class Reliability and Redundancy

VoIP Migration: Use analog phones over GPON to connect IP to a softswitch

Less Space: up to 90% Reduction in Floor, Rack & Closet SpaceLess Heat: up to 80% Less Heat OutputLess Power: up to 80% Lower Power ConsumptionLower Cost: up to 70% Lower Capital Costs

Superior Communication Solutions, Inc.www.scsi-ga.com

[email protected][email protected]# 194612656 • Cage Code: 45ZF7 • (800) 916-1398

Page 40: 2012 Spring Edition

ground, using equipment carried in their rucksack, they can assess visibility, cloud ceiling and the wind’s speed and direction. Pilots can then use that information to drop bombs, resupply a unit or evacuate an injured soldier.

“When the weather starts getting hairy, the pilots and aircrews love the fact they can get on the radio and talk to a trained weather guy on the ground, who can tell them, ‘Hey, you’ve got a 3,000-foot ceiling. You can get a helicopter in,’ ” Syc says. “They abso-lutely love getting information they can rely upon.”

Collecting weather information from the ground also helps de-velop a forecast, which can affect the timing of a mission or the route units take. Sometimes the combat weathermen make those forecasts themselves, but often they relay information on local humidity, air pressure and temperature to another location, where

another meteorologist uses multiple readings and com-puters to improve accuracy.

But there are other com-bat weather missions, too

– and they don’t always limit themselves strictly to weather. For instance, in Afghanistan, weathermen have worked with the Army Corps of Engineers to collect data on rivers. With that data, they helped develop computer models that could tell them which vil-lages are at risk of getting wiped out in a flash flood.

“Now, we’re able to give a community an assessment of what the flash-flood risk is,” Syc says. “That’s not something that’s been done before in Afghanistan.”

In another recent mission, a weatherman working with a Special Operations team in a mountainous part of Afghanistan drew on his training, looked at the slope of the mountains and weather forecast and advised the team that it should take a different route through the mountains than was being proposed. He feared an avalanche. Just a week later, with the team safely taking another route, the avalanche struck, wiping out an Afghan village.

Because they accompany Special Operations Forces, the Air Force’s weather technicians have to be nimble. They can’t carry a lot of bulky equipment – only what fits in a

rucksack. Fortunately, technology has advanced to a point that so-phisticated equipment is small and light.

For combat weather personnel, the principal device is a cell-phone-sized Kestrel Pocket Weather Meter, made by Nielsen Kellerman Co. of Boothwyn, Pa. It measures, tracks and transmits a dozen critical weather conditions, including temperature, wind speed, humidity, air pressure, dew point and altitude. The model most popular with the military weighs just 3.6 ounces – less than the latest model of the iPhone.

The 80-employee company started in 1978 making handheld de-vices to help coxswains, who direct crews in rowing competitions. Nearly 20 years later, it expanded into handheld wind meters for sports, aviation and military applications. Today, the military accounts for about 30 percent of the company’s sales of weather meters, says Katie Godfrey, Nielsen Kellerman’s director of sales and marketing.

A member of the Air Force’s Special Operations weather team collects weather data. Team members use small handheld devices to collect a variety of weather data, which helps improve forecasts.

PHO

TO: A

ir Fo

rce

Sp

ec

ial O

pe

ratio

ns

Co

mm

an

d

(ABOVE) Members of the Air Force’s Special Operations weather team participate in training that helps them spot avalanche dangers. (BELOW) Staff Sgt. Bryce Houser, a Special Operations weatherman, inputs data on his laptop. Members of the Air Force’s weather teams often accompany Special Operations units and provide them with accurate weather forecasts, which improve the odds of success of missions.

PHO

TO: A

ir Fo

rce

Sp

ec

ial O

pe

ratio

ns

Co

mm

an

d

40 DEFENSE STANDARD Spr ing 2012

Page 41: 2012 Spring Edition

41Spr ing 2012 DEFENSE STANDARD

*Contact Admissions for degree availability at each campus. **Disclosure statements available at www.stratford.edu/disclosures

School of Business AdministrationBusiness Administration (MBA, BS, AAS) International Business Administration (IMBA) Enterprise Business Management (MS) Entrepreneurial Management (MS)Accounting (MS, BS, AAS)

School of Computer Information Systems Software Engineering (MS) Information Systems (MS) Information Assurance (MS) Telecommunications (MS) Information Technology (BS)Network Management & Security (AAS)

School of Health Sciences Health Care Administration (BS)Medical Assisting (AAS) Clinical Hemodialysis Technician (AAS) EKG-Phlebotomy Technician (AAS) Medical Insurance Billing and Coding (AAS) Pharmacy Technician (AAS)

School of Culinary Arts and Hospitality International Hospitality Management (MS)Hospitality Management (BA) Culinary Management (BA)Hotel & Restaurant Management (AAS) Baking & Pastry Arts (AAS) Advanced Culinary Arts (AAS)

School of Nursing Nursing (BSN)

Stratford degree programs are designed to meet the educational needs of the Military • Stratford has accelerated programs – 15 months for an AAS degree,

an additional 15 months for a BS and another 15 months for a Masters degree. Just think, with the right commitment, you can complete all course work for all degrees in less than four years!

• Flexible class schedules – Day, evening, and weekend classes • Online degrees available in several programs • Five entry points per year: January, March, May, August, October • Career placement assistance • Free tutoring available • Veteran on staff for your assistance • Stratford accepts transfer credits – Stratford University accepts

transfer credit up to 75% for undergraduate and up to 50% for graduate degrees. Transfer credits are accepted from: AARTS, SMART, CCAF, ACE, DANTES, CLEP as well as other colleges and universities.

Stratford University is affi liated with • Service Members Opportunity College (SOC) • Concurrent Admissions Program (ConAP)

Falls Church Campus at Tysons Corner7777 Leesburg PikeFalls Church, VA 22043703-821-8570 / 800-444-0804

Baltimore Campus at Inner Harbor17 Commerce StreetBaltimore, MD 21202410-752-4710 / 800-624-9926

Newport News near Oyster Point836 J. Clyde Morris BoulevardNewport News, VA 23601 757-873-4235 / 855-873-4235

Richmond Campus at Glen Allen11104 W. Broad StreetGlen Allen, VA 23060804-290-4231 / 877-373-5173

Woodbridge Campus at Potomac Mills14349 Gideon DriveWoodbridge, VA 22192703-897-1982 / 888-546-1250

MilitaryStudentOffi ce.com

Yellow Ribbon

Page 42: 2012 Spring Edition

“A lot of weather reconnaissance guys like them because the units are very, very small, compact and lightweight,” she says. “They’ve reduced the amount of gear the guys have to carry.”

Besides the Kestrels, weather team members typically carry tactical balloons and set them aloft with helium, which help them assess wind conditions. They also bring rangefinders, which help them determine cloud altitudes and visibility.

But perhaps the most important piece of equipment is their eyes.Syc says weather team members learn to “read the sky,” looking

for clouds and other conditions that give clues to what’s coming. For instance, the arrival of high, white, wispy cirrus clouds signals that fair weather is likely for a day or two but that a storm could move in after that. Shifting wind direction can also indicate nearby storms or upcoming temperature changes.

“The more information you have about what the weather is like right now, the better your forecast becomes and the better you can plan 96 hours into the future,” Syc says.

As Sun Tzu observed in the Chinese military treatise The Art of War, which dates to at least the second century B.C.: “If you know the weather and the terrain, victory

will always be assured.”Of course, accurate weather assessments were not possible until

centuries later. The barometer and thermometer were invented in the 17th century, and the invention of the telegraph in 1837 for the first time allowed scientists in the emerging field of meteorology to compile and analyze large amounts of data in real time.

Today’s Special Operations weather teams trace their origins to World War II, when the predecessor to today’s Central Intelligence Agency, the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), trained weather airmen in parachuting, close combat and weaponry. The Air Force dropped many of these men into France at the beginning of the Nor-mandy invasion on June 6, 1944 (which itself was delayed for a day

because of weather).According to a recent article in Air Commando Journal, one

such airman, Staff Sgt. Robert Dodson, parachuted before dawn into a field of grazing cattle in St. Mere Eglise, a few miles west of Utah Beach. For 15 days, he radioed in data including wind direc-tion and speed, visibility, cloud heights, temperature and dew point to headquarters. Weather airmen later participated in operations in the Netherlands and Yugoslavia.

The Air Force also sent weather teams into Vietnam and Thai-land in the 1960s to collect weather data and train local populations, which helped improve forecasts for North Vietnam. Since then, combat weathermen have participated in most of the well-known missions that have involved Special Operations, including those in Grenada, Panama, Iraq (twice), Somalia, Haiti, the former Yugosla-via and Afghanistan.

Today, Syc says the Air Force’s Special Operations weather teams appeal to men who are both brainy and athletic – people who enjoy studying and learning an academic discipline but also enjoy physical work. If recruits want merely to jump out of planes and fire weapons, there are already plenty of outlets for that, but a combat weatherman is a special breed, he says.

Now, recruits can enlist and move directly into two years of training, a regimen that includes intensive courses in meteorology as well as jump school, survival training and other instruction in Special Operations tactics. Recruits typically enlist for four- or six-year commitments.

“Our guys have to be as qualified as a Special Forces guy, but at the same time, these are scientists on the battlefield,” he says. “Most of the guys who join are already interested in weather, but they don’t want to be stuck behind a desk for the rest of their career. They are people who enjoy the outdoors, enjoy a challenge, who like to push themselves, and who have some interest in weather, for one reason or another.”

Staff Sgt. Bryce Houser, a Special Operations weatherman, assesses a river in southern Afghanistan. In addition to helping forecast weather, the Air Force’s Special Operations weather team has worked with the Army Corps of Engineers in Afghanistan to assess flash-flood risks for local villages.

PHO

TO: A

ir Fo

rce

Sp

ec

ial O

pe

ratio

ns

Co

mm

an

d

42 DEFENSE STANDARD Spr ing 2012

J

Page 43: 2012 Spring Edition

Client:

Project:

Campaign:

Creative:

AE:

Sigma Group - 283421

2012-03 Mar PAN TB

Federal Government

PSC4716: Mission Critical

SL

Publication:

IO #:

Issue:

Ad Type:

Proofs:

Defense Standard Quarterly

004408-00

2012-Spring

P4CB

B: = 8.625” x 11.125”

T: = 8.375” x 10.875”

S: = 7.875” x 10.375”

1

Ship Info: Defense Standard Quarterly

DEFENSE STANDARDS LLC

14502 N Dale Mabry Hwy, Suite 305

Tampa , FL 33618

Attn: Production Department

T: 202.640.2137

E: [email protected]

Contact Jane Fidler with any questions regarding these materials.ph: 646-230-1946 email: [email protected]

33 East 17th Street, New York, NY 10003 • 646-230-1900

K100 K75 K50 K25 C100 C75 C50 C25 M100 M75 M50 M25 Y100 Y75 Y50 Y25 R100 R75 R50 R25 G100 G75 G50 G25 B100 B75 B50 B25PAPER

SOLUTIONS FOR THE U.S. MILITARY

Access mission-critical information anywhere. Fully-rugged Panasonic Toughbook® mobile computers, powered by the Intel® Core™ i5 vPro™ processor. Keeping you combat-ready with industry-leading reliability is how we’re engineering a better world.

panasonic.com/business-solutions

Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Core, Intel vPro, Core Inside and vPro Inside are trademarks of Intel Corporation in the U.S. and/or other countries. Toughbook notebook PCs are covered by a 3-year limited warranty, parts and labor. To view the full text of the warranty, log on to panasonic.com/toughbook/warranty. Please consult your Panasonic representative prior to purchase. Panasonic is constantly enhancing product specifi cations and accessories. Specifi cations subject to change without notice. ©2012 Panasonic Corporation of North America. All rights reserved. Mission-critical_ FG_FY12-1

Access missPanasonic ToCore™ i5 vProleading reliab

panasonic.comToughbook 31 Toughbook 19 Toughbook U1 Ultra

Panasonic recommends Windows® 7.

S: 7.875”S: 10.375”

T: 8.375”T: 10.875”

B: 8.625”B: 11.125”

PSC4716-1_FG_DefenseStandardQuarterly_Spring2012_P4CB.indd 1 3/19/12 3:57 PM

Page 44: 2012 Spring Edition

The Edge

of PossibilityBy Rich Tuttle

Stealth meets science asDARPA and SOCOM

collaborate on game-changing technologies

Dust kicked up by rotor blades can impede helicopter operations. LADAR technology could help pilots to see clearly even in such conditions. Here, Afghan commandos and U.S. Special Forces move to a ridgeline in Takhar Province, Afghanistan, after being dropped off by a Chinook.

U.S. Special Operations Forces don’t talk much about the high-tech systems they use to carry out some of the country’s most sensitive missions,

and they almost never talk about systems being developed for future use. But it’s clear that they have some pretty amazing devices and that more are on the way. These devices, like the operators themselves, work at the edge of possibility.

Take the idea of determining from a distance the interior layout of a building, whether it contains caches of weapons, and even if someone’s inside and where they are. A device for doing all that was recently transferred to U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM) from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) -- and might have been used in the raid to kill Osama bin Laden.

The evidence seems strong. For one thing, the SEALs who conducted the raid last May are known to have rehearsed the operation in at least one mockup of bin Laden’s hideout in Abbottabad, Pakistan. Once the building was identified as the likely target, aerial or satellite reconnaissance surely

told what the exterior looked like. But to practice the raid, it has been suggested that a clandestinely obtained map of the inside must also have been available.

DARPA’s VisiBuilding device seems to fit the bill. It pulses a building with radio frequency energy and uses special techniques to make sense of what would otherwise be wildly scattered returns. The data can be used to map the layout and size of rooms, and to detect people and supplies of weapons. An over-flight by a stealthy aircraft packing a VisiBuilding sensor shortly before the raid would have given SEALs up-to-the-minute information.

Special operators are almost certainly interested in another technique for mapping the layout of a building. It involves a palm-sized flying robot fitted with a camera and a laser range finder. It uses the sensors to simultaneously navigate from room to room and build a map of things like doorways, windows, furniture and even people, figuring out all along where it is with respect to such features.

“So suppose I were to send this into a building and I had

PHO

TO: S

gt.

Ka

tryn

Mc

Ca

lme

nt

44 DEFENSE STANDARD Spr ing 2012

Page 45: 2012 Spring Edition

G4S International Training Inc. has been a quality training provider forover 20 years. All of our instructors are prior military or law enforcement professionals. We specialize in Driving, Firearms, CounterTerrorism, Protective Services,Combatives and Medical Courses. Go to www.g4siti.com to find out more about classesoffered by G4S International Training Inc. or call us 804-785-6000.

M/D/F/V

Page 46: 2012 Spring Edition

46 DEFENSE STANDARD Spr ing 2012

A 16-square-inch sheet of “Geckskin” holds a 660-pound load while adhering to a vertical

sheet of glass. The material mimics the adhesion

properties of a gecko’s foot. DARPA has shown that a soldier carrying a

normal combat pack can use the material to climb

25-foot walls.

no idea what the building looked like. I can ask this robot to go in, create a map, and then come back and tell me what the building looks like,” says Vijay Kumar, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania’s School of Engineering and Applied Sciences.

Narrating a video clip at a recent conference, he said the quad-rotor robot, developed by Kumar and Daniel Mellinger and Alex Kushleyev of KMel Robotics, “is not only solving the problem of how to get from Point A to Point B on [the] map, but it’s [constantly] figuring out what the best Point B is. ... So it essentially knows where to go to look for places that have the least information, and that’s how it populates the map.”

A swarm of such micro-bots could have a range of other applications, including attack, of interest to special operators. KMel and the University of Pennsylvania have dramatically demonstrated how 20 of the little robots can move in flawless planar and three-dimensional formations, even modifying formations on the fly to zip through obstacles such as open windows.

What if you just want to look through a wall? Several devices are available to special operators. One is supplied by Israel’s Camero-

Tech Ltd. Its line of Xaver systems, held against a wall, can tell “whether there are people present, how many are present and where they are situated,” according to the company. It says the technology also allows mapping, and can detect “non-moving live targets.”

The U.S. Army’s AN/PPS-26 Sense-Through-The-Wall device can be held against walls, or operated from a distance. Powered by lithium AA batteries, it can detect “both moving and stationary targets,” the Army says. Two companies are involved -- L-3 Communications’ CyTerra unit in Orlando, Fla., and Raytheon Co.’s Space and Airborne Systems division of Buena Park, Calif. L-3 calls its system EMMDAR, for Electro-Magnetic Motion Detection And Ranging, and says it will ensure “elevated mission success rates and the ability to save lives.” Raytheon says enemy combatants would be identified by target recognition algorithms.

But what if you get all the information you need about a building’s layout and you’re still not sure you want to send special operators inside? DARPA’s Avatar program may someday be of assistance. The idea is to allow a soldier to “partner with a semi-autonomous bi-pedal machine and allow it to act as the soldier’s surrogate,” DARPA says -- just as in the hit movie “Avatar.” The program, which is new in the Pentagon budget released in February, aims to “allow soldiers to remain out of harm’s way while still leveraging their experience and strengths to complete important missions such as sentry/perimeter control, room clearing, combat casualty recovery, and, eventually, dismounted combat maneuver,” according to DARPA.

Could “dismounted combat maneuver” include taking on pirates? Maybe. If so, a cautious Avatar might want to toss one of ReconRobotics’ 1-pound Scout Throwbots onto the hull of a ship and let it climb up to check things out. Alan Bignall, president and CEO of ReconRobotics in Edina, Minn., says Scout Throwbot “could help mitigate maritime piracy threats and protect the lives of naval personnel and anti-piracy teams.” The company is working with Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Pacific to quickly develop a “marsupial-robot deployment system” that sounds like it might someday lead to an anti-piracy Avatar application. The marsupial system “enables an operator of a large robot to automatically transport and deploy a smaller robot downrange,” the company says.

The hull-climbing Recon Scout Throwbot is based on a platform the company says is widely used by military and law enforcement communities. A spokesman declines to say whether this includes Special Forces. The company describes its robots as small, rugged and easy to use. One model weighs 1.2 pounds, can be deployed in five seconds and can survive a 120-foot lob. The hull-crawler features magnetized wheels and an infrared sensor to see in the dark.

But what if the Avatar itself, or even a soldier, could quickly climb up the hull of a ship – or any other vertical surface for that matter? DARPA transitioned early versions of just such technology to military services in 2010. Inspired by geckos, spiders and small animals, the technology of the

PHO

TO: C

ou

rte

sy o

f DA

RPA

Page 47: 2012 Spring Edition
Page 48: 2012 Spring Edition

Z-Man program optimizes man-made versions of mechanisms used by these creatures as “novel climbing aids” for humans, according to DARPA. It’s already shown that a soldier with a typical load can use the technology to climb a 25-foot wall. One output of the program is called “Geckskin.” In a demonstration, a 16-square-inch sheet of the material adhered to a vertical glass wall while supporting a static load of up to 660 pounds.

Want to launch a missile from a moving or stationary light truck to strike another vehicle, say an SUV, also moving or standing still, during

the day or at night and in all kinds of weather, up to 50 miles away? SOCOM is on it, and asking industry for ways to do this. While the weapon -- called the Medium Range Precision Strike System, or MRPSS -- is intended for ground-to-ground engagements, SOCOM also wants it to be compatible with fixed-wing aircraft and helicopters.

Once launched, MRPSS would get to its target using such high-tech guidance modes as millimeter wave radar, synthetic aperture radar, imaging infrared or light detection and ranging (LIDAR). LIDAR is a way to detect distant objects and determine their position by analyzing the laser light pulses they reflect. It’s also known as LADAR, for laser detection and ranging. The technology was slated for evaluation at Camp Roberts, Calif., this spring for application to another SOCOM requirement, safely flying helicopters in poor visibility.

How about quickly sorting through the masses of data gathered by a cornucopia of sensors to find a terrorist? SOCOM is on the list to benefit from an effort called Data-to-Decisions, being run by the Office of the Secretary of Defense. Terrorists and insurgents are “deeply buried within local populations” and are good at blending in “with urban clutter,” OSD says. Finding them “has

driven an explosion in sensing capabilities,” but that “has so stressed our current technologies that the majority of data now collected is thrown away.” To make things worse, emerging sensors reportedly will generate more data than all currently fielded U.S. unmanned aircraft combined. In the words of one Air Force general, “we are swimming in sensors and drowning in data.”

Data-to-Decisions aims to solve the problem by advancing the art of analysis to the point where data can be “fused with relevant contextual or situational information to provide our warfighters and decision-makers with insight and powerful decision aids,” Congress was told by OSD’s director of defense research and engineering, Zachary Lemnios.

One approach is being taken by Future Point Systems Inc. of Reston, Va. Its Starlight system organizes data so it can be analyzed visually. It does this by capturing relationships among disparate bits of information, and then graphically representing those relationships. Advances in such efforts are of interest to SOCOM and others in the U.S. defense and intelligence establishment.

Who’s in that room? ReconRobotics of Edina, Minn., says its Recon Scout Throwbot XT can tell you. Just toss it in and take a look at the images it sends back. A U.S. Marine Corps order for 126 announced in March follows four orders in the last six months from the U.S. Army for some 1,800 of the

micro-robots.

PHO

TO: C

ou

rte

sy o

f Re

co

nR

ob

otic

s

48 DEFENSE STANDARD Spr ing 2012

J

Page 49: 2012 Spring Edition

I heard you the first time...®

Try then buy... 30 Day Eval Program

The Digital Ears® System by INVISIO® allows tactical operators to take full control of their 2-way radio communications and can adapt on the fly for use on ground vehicles, watercraft, aircraft intercom systems and even new smart devices. The system also features the INVISIO® X-Series Dual In-Ear Bone Con-duction Headset that gives you unmatched voice quality even in extreme noise and also provides certified in-ear hearing protection and best in class 360° Combat Awareness.

Digital Ears®Tactical Headset System

ContractGS-07F-0277K

INVISIO® X50Dual-Com Push-to-Talk Unit

INVISIO® X5Dual In-Ear Tactical Headset

INVISIO® M80Rail Mounted Push-to-Talk

OPTIONAL ACCESSORY

Photo by HBL Productions, LLC

NY 845-278-0960 - TX 469-362-0121CA 310-457-7401 - IN 574-264-7217

2012© Television Equipment Associates, Inc., All rights reserved

2012 SOFICBooth 1352

Page 50: 2012 Spring Edition

By Rich Tuttle

Successful combat test earns Rifleman Radio the Ranger seal of approval

Joint Tactical Radio systeM

As the U.S. Army conducts another in a series of evaluations of systems for its new tactical communications network in May and June at Fort

Bliss, Texas, and White Sands Missile Range, N.M., the Rifleman Radio will be getting a close look.

Army Rangers completed the radio’s first formal combat test this April in Afghanistan. They liked its size, weight and power; its ability to share information, voice and data among small units on the move; and its capacity to network with various forces. The Rangers’ feedback will be cranked into the desert evaluation. If all goes well in this and other tests, the Army ultimately will deploy the radio across the entire force, buying some 190,000 units. Full-rate production is expected to begin this year.

Rifleman Radio will be a game-changer, according to Col. John Zavarelli, manager of the Handheld, Manpack and Small Form Fit (HMS) program office, which is responsible for Rifleman Radio. He says it will allow the individual soldier “to conduct his mission more effectively, he’ll have more survivability, and likely be able to be more lethal because of what the radio allows him to do with either voice or data communications.”

The radio is part of the Joint Tactical Radio System, or JTRS, program, which started some 15 years ago. It has been a rocky road for the family of radios; the Pentagon had spent $8 billion on JTRS as of late last year, according to the Government Accountability Office. The goal has been to replace a range of legacy radios carried by foot soldiers and mounted in ground vehicles and aircraft.

JTRS radios are intended for all the services, but JTRS was to

have had a starring role in the Army’s Future Combat Systems program, a mix of vehicles and weapons linked together by a battlefield information network. FCS was canceled several years ago after $18 billion in spending. As JTRS itself staggered with technical and schedule problems, demands of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan forced the Army to spend more money on older radios, whose sophistication began to rival that of some of the planned JTRS models.

JTRS was drastically revamped last October when defense officials ordered the elimination of the centerpiece vehicle-mounted Ground Mobile Radio. The Rifleman Radio remains, as do radios in several other programs being carried out under the JTRS umbrella.

Troubles with FCS, JTRS and other big programs prompted an earthquake in the way the Army acquires information technology. The idea now, called agile acquisition, is to synchronize the procurement of network systems with the cycle of training by equipping and deploying various units. In the past, integration of new systems was left to individual units. Now, new systems like Rifleman Radio will be introduced to fighting units early on. That means they’ll know their new IT systems well when they enter combat and will therefore be more effective in battle, according to the Army, which sees the new network as the core of a more capable force that is also smaller -- a big consideration in times of tight budgets. The network is, in fact, the Army’s No. 1 investment priority. And JTRS is one of the top Defense Department acquisition programs.

50 DEFENSE STANDARD Spr ing 2012

Page 51: 2012 Spring Edition
Page 52: 2012 Spring Edition

Two platoons of the 75th Ranger Regiment may or may not have been aware of all this when they conducted their

operational assessment of 100 Rifleman Radios in Afghanistan from December through April. But their findings must have pleased Army leaders. They found the 2-pound radio to be “effective, suitable and reliable,” says Mark Kaniut, technical director of the HMS office.

“They said it’s easy to use and is an appropriate size, weight and power, with a battery life in excess of eight hours,” Kaniut say in an interview. He declines to say where in Afghanistan the radio was evaluated, or to give specific examples of how it worked. He did say it was distributed to individual rifle team members, who used it on patrol. He says the radio, built by General Dynamics C4 Systems of Scottsdale, Ariz., and designated AN/PRC-154, worked well “inside buildings, through multiple walls, and to positions outside of compounds.”

Unlike legacy radios, each Rifleman Radio is a node in a network. Because each radio relays information to others like it in a unit, the integrity of the network is maintained over a broad area even though the soldiers carrying the radios continue to

move. This relay capability is provided by a waveform, or radio language. Soldiers can thus communicate “despite obstacles like buildings and terrain,” Kaniut says. The Rangers saw radio battery life of up to 10 hours, he says, further increasing their combat effectiveness.

In an earlier evaluation, soldiers said they preferred the Rifleman Radio “rather than lugging bulky wideband handheld radios that require extra batteries,” according to Chris Brady, vice president of assured communications for GD C4 Systems.

The Rangers “felt the radio was very effective for conducting infantry operations, especially at the small-unit level,” Zavarelli says. “Rifleman Radio allowed them to execute missions very rapidly because they had an improved awareness of where they were in relation to surrounding troops. Mission command decisions were achieved faster.”

The Rangers’ Rifleman Radios were used with an 8-ounce arm- or chest-worn computer from General Dynamics called the GD300. The device, with a 3.5-inch touch-screen display, connected the radio to the network. It ran an application called Tactical Ground Reporting, or TIGR, that sent text messages

Paratroopers from the 3rd Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, use Rifleman Radios to communicate during an exercise at Fort Bragg, N.C.

PHO

TO: A

shle

y Bl

um

en

feld

52 DEFENSE STANDARD Spr ing 2012

Page 53: 2012 Spring Edition

AR-50 (JITC Certified)• JITC Cert, PRC-117G, PSC-5D• 50 watts of power• Fast automatic switching

• Switchable LNA andco-site filters

• Small size

KMW1031 Kit• The “lightest” 20-watt amplifier kit

on the market at less than 2.5 lbs.• Fully automatic band-switching• No VSWR fault or reset required• Single battery full spec operation• Waterproof

• Kit includes amplifier,30-512 MHz antenna,RF cables, battery cable &tactical vest pouches for boththe amp and the antenna.

GSA Contract Number GS-07F-0371U. Call us at 425-485-9000 or visit us at www.arworld.us.

modular rfOther ar divisions: rf/microwave instrumentation • receiver systems • ar europe Copyright© 2012 AR. The orange stripe on AR products is Reg. U.S. Pat. & TM. Off.The Battle Tested logo is Reg. U.S. Pat. & TM. Off. # 3,821,099.

All AR products are backed by the 3 year no nonsense warranty.

These state-of-the-art amplifiers supporttactical waveforms including:DAMA, SINCGARS, HAVEQUICK,HPW, IW and ANW2.

DefenseStandard_BattleTested:Layout 1 3/6/12 6:34 PM Page 1

Our family of companies has

ability to meet your needsprovenvt-systems.com

Ruggedized TacticalHandheld Device

Rugged TabletComputer Unit

Mark V SOC Ambassador Mk 1

A Reputation for Engineering Ability

Page 54: 2012 Spring Edition

and other information to individual soldiers, including location of friendly troops.

The linking of such a device to the Rifleman Radio gives soldiers “real-time mission command capabilities and [enhances] their situational awareness,” Zavarelli says.

An officer of the 2nd Brigade, 1st Armored Division found that the radios altered his soldiers’ approach to their missions, according to GD. It quotes Capt. Ryan McNally, a company commander with the 2/1 AD, as saying, “We [can] talk to each other over a distance, rather than everybody being essentially co-located with a limited amount of space and distance between them. Now we can expand that space and distance. We can cover a larger area.”

GD also quotes 2nd Lt. Travis B. Mount, a 2/1 AD platoon leader, as saying the technology showing positions of his troops saved him time by allowing him to immediately adapt and execute his plans.

The JTRS program has many moving parts. It includes four separate acquisition programs. There’s Zavarelli’s

HMS, with General Dynamics as the prime contractor developing the Rifleman Radio and several others; there’s MIDS, or Multifunctional Information Distribution System, under which air- and ship-borne terminals are being developed; there’s AMF, the Airborne, Maritime and Fixed station effort, which is responsible for ship, aircraft and fixed terminals with Lockheed Martin as the prime; and there’s NED, or Network Enterprise Domain, which is developing waveforms. A new effort called MNVR, for Mid-Tiered Networking Vehicular Radio, is growing out of the canceled Ground Mobile Radio program, which was run by Boeing.

As if all that wasn’t complicated enough, the technical fields can cause some to scratch their heads. There’s position location, software, encryption and interoperable communications, to name a few. In addition, there have been a number of programmatic changes over the years, including several in the number and types of HMS radios.

It all means a near-continuous effort to keep Congress up to speed, according to Jeff Mercer, a spokesman for the JTRS office in San Diego. He says Army Brig. Gen. Michael E. Williamson, the JTRS joint program executive officer, makes numerous trips to Capitol Hill. “It really is a challenge to keep getting out there and educating folks on not only what the program’s all about [but] where we are and where we’re going,” Mercer says. “We try to work that very hard.”

Williamson’s efforts are bolstered by periodic reports to Congress from the Government Accountability Office. And it’s not all good news. A March GAO report, for instance, says that Rifleman Radio entered low-rate production in June 2011 “without demonstrating the maturity of one of its critical technologies -- the soldier radio waveform -- in a realistic environment.” And, it says, Rifleman Radio “fell short of its reliability requirement in testing conducted in early 2011.” But, it said, performance was consistent with a plan for ever-increasing reliability, and reliability was expected to exceed requirements during operational testing.

General Dynamics and Thales Communications have been in low-rate production of Rifleman Radios since last year. When approval is given for full production this spring, they, and perhaps others, will compete for the job. It’s “a full and open competition,” HMS’s Kaniut says.

The approval will come just as a range of equipment, systems and vehicles are being checked out at Fort Bliss and White Sands Missile Range in the Army’s Network Integration Evaluation 12.2, the third in a series of big evaluations. It will involve 3,800 soldiers of the 2/1 AD. They’ll check out what the Army calls Capability Set 13, a mix of equipment and systems, including Rifleman Radio, intended to yield a several-fold increase in fighting capability. Plans call for the first brigade to be equipped with Capability Set 13 in the next year or so. At least 20 brigades ultimately will get the integrated suites.

Rifleman Radio has been through a number of soldier evaluations in addition to the one by the Rangers, and each yields lessons. “It’s continually improving in reliability and performance,” Kaniut says.

Small computers are used by 82nd Airborne paratroopers to run a Tactical Ground Reporting (TIGR) app during an exercise at Fort Bragg, N.C.

J

54 DEFENSE STANDARD Spr ing 2012

PHO

TO: A

shle

y Bl

um

en

feld

Page 55: 2012 Spring Edition
Page 56: 2012 Spring Edition

U.S. Special Operations Command equips its small teams with the best possible individual gear to give them the greatest chance of success in vital and difficult missions.

USSOCOM uses the latest technology in just about every aspect of personal equipment, from headsets and gloves to backpacks, vision augmentation systems and body armor.

The sophistication of such systems allows an operator “to ignore threats or dangers or encumbrances that somebody not so equipped is constantly aware of,” says Dakota L. Wood, formerly a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, a think tank in Washington. They “make it possible to do things much more easily and effectively than their enemy is able to,” says Wood, a retired Marine Corps lieutenant colonel who studied the operational challenges of irregular warfare.

A headset developed by 3M, for instance, integrates communications and hearing protection using a technology the company calls Talk-Through. With 3M’s Comtac Advanced Communication Headset, loud noises like gunfire and explosions are transmitted to the ear at safe levels while softer sounds like whispers or rustling leaves are amplified, says Tom Lavalle, a business development specialist at 3M’s Military Marketing Center in Indianapolis, Ind.

3M also makes hearing protectors for troops who don’t use a radio. One, called the Combat Arms Earplug, kicks in protection only when it’s needed. It uses a patented filter that allows a soldier to hear things like conversations and footsteps but dampens a loud noise the instant it occurs, according to Doug Moses, a 3M business development specialist and marketing manager.

A “modular glove system” from Outdoor Research of Seattle is a set of five gloves that can be worn in layers in extreme

cold weather, or separately for a variety of other conditions. “It’s a collection,” says Mike Christian, director of government sales for OR. “You can take them from the desert floor in Afghanistan all the way to the highest peak there.”

One layer is fire-resistant in response to the threat of roadside bombs. “We certainly knew how to make good, dexterous, tight-fitting, durable gloves, but were certainly introduced to some new materials,” including Nomex and Kevlar, to make the fire-resistant layer, Christian says.

Night sights, rifle sights, thermal sights and image-intensification goggles are all made for Special Operations Forces by L-3 Communications’ Warrior Systems unit. The unit was formed after L-3’s acquisition of Insight Technology Corp., a long-time supplier of night-vision and electro-optical equipment with close links to the special operations community. Laser targeting and acquisition markers come from Northrop Grumman.

“Lightweight laser-designator rangefinders that we make are probably, outside of night-vision goggles, the most high-tech piece of equipment that a Spec Ops operator carries all the time. It’s starting to become as common as your water bottle,” says Paul Cabellon, a Northrop Grumman spokesman.

SOCOM’s Body Armor Load Carriage System (BALCS) is supplied by Mystery Ranch, a backpack-maker in Bozeman, Mont. BALCS features the latest fitting and stability technology, according to the company. Mystery Ranch, formed in 2000 primarily to work

Equipping the tip of the spear

Entrepreneurial companies specialize in off-the-shelf gear for off-the-hook operations

By Rich Tuttle

56 DEFENSE STANDARD Spr ing 2012

Page 57: 2012 Spring Edition
Page 58: 2012 Spring Edition

Special SOF gear includes earplugs and headsets that amplify soft sounds while dampening gunfire and explosions.

PHO

TO: C

ou

rte

sy 3

M

58 DEFENSE STANDARD Spr ing 2012

with the Navy SEAL community, has since worked with every tier of Special Operations, according to Mark Seacat, director of marketing. “We create everything, from light-carry three-day assault packs, which is probably our most popular pack, to concealed sniper rifle packs.” The Rapid Access Trauma System, or RATS, pack uses Velcro and color-coding to allow a medic to quickly pull out just what is needed.

Ceramic body armor is produced by Ceradyne Inc., of Costa Mesa, Calif. The armor is made of boron carbide, which Ceradyne describes as “the lightest technical ceramic material ... as well as the hardest,” second only to diamonds.

Special Forces have almost always had special gear, but the level of sophistication seems to have begun increasing after 1987,

when U. S. Special Operations Command was formed. One reason is that with all the money in one bucket instead of being spread around to special units in the individual services, it has been easier to develop and acquire the lighter, more durable and more technically advanced gear demanded by high-risk, high-payoff missions.

Navy SEALs thus have ready access to gear more resistant than normal to corrosion, while Army special operators get lighter, more capable personal gear. If rifles and sidearms must be souped up, it can happen quickly. Instead of a standard-issue 9mm Beretta pistol, for instance, Special Forces operators may prefer a Colt .45 with modifications like a unique trigger -- and have no problem getting it in a hurry.

The service components within Special Operations Forces do make the greatest possible use of equipment provided by their parent

services, but “the unique nature of SOF missions frequently drives different materiel solutions,” and those solutions “are often different among” the services, says Wes Ticer, a USSOCOM spokesman.

For example, he says, “in the mobility area, the service-provided High Mobility Multi-Wheeled Vehicles (HMMWV) and Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Vehicles (MRAP) are often outfitted with specific command, control, communication and computer (C4) intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) suites to support specific SOF service-component branch requirements.”

Such niche capabilities aren’t usually given to all U.S. forces because they are not required, and because they’re not cheap. The Special Forces community is willing to pay the price of high-tech individual gear because it’s justified by the importance of the mission, Wood says. “They have to succeed, and you want to be able to bring everybody back.”

But, he says, the real force multipliers are the operators themselves. The value of the Special Forces community “lies in training and education -- being so well trained in various tactics, techniques and procedures, being able to assess a situation and then being able to draw from a great many different options about how to solve a particular problem.” One former Special Forces soldier who served in the 1980s says he is impressed by new gear, but he points to his head and says, “This is what’s going to save you.”

Still, the Special Operations Command is putting some serious money into individual equipment. The command’s acquisition

and logistics arm has several program executive offices, or PEOs, to handle procurement -- fixed wing, maritime systems, a support activity, rotary wing, special reconnaissance and SOF Warrior.

PEO-SOF Warrior’s job is to “enhance lethality, mobility and survivability” in ground activities, according to the command. One of its responsibilities is the SOF Personal Equipment Advanced Requirements (SPEAR) program, which covers body armor, helmets, load carriage systems, backpacks, gloves, eye protection and communications headsets. All are “designed and developed to provide an integrated modular system for the SOF Warrior,” the command says. Another SOF Warrior individual equipment responsibility is the Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) program, aimed at providing life-saving first aid in tactical situations.

SOF operators are able cover a range of missions with their individual gear because it “has been designed to be both interoperable and modular,” Ticer says. “This tailored-ability enables SOF operators to rapidly reconfigure their equipment and execute assigned missions in remote locations.”

Because Special Operations troops operate in rugged environments, equipment reliability and maintainability is critical, he says, along with the ability to tailor equipment training and maintenance to those operational realities.

Page 59: 2012 Spring Edition
Page 60: 2012 Spring Edition

Standard military gear is often modified for Special Operations use.

Contractors must ensure that Special Operations communication equipment, like this headset worn by Staff Sgt. Tim Sammis, an MC-130P Combat Shadow radio operator, works in a variety of settings.

PHO

TOS:

Te

ch

. Sg

t. D

eN

oris

Mic

kle

J

60 DEFENSE STANDARD Spr ing 2012

Meanwhile, a range of research and development efforts are under way within PEO-SOF Warrior. They are: adapting digital multispectral technologies to improve night-vision capabilities; reducing weapon signatures; seeking lighter weight, more protective body armor; improving crew situational awareness by integrating sensors into mobility platforms; and reducing the weight of vehicle armor to improve mobility.

A big reason for the emphasis on technology is that adversaries are constantly on the lookout for ways to offset systems in

the Special Operations arsenal. Technologies of all kinds proliferate over time, meaning that “more actors get access to them,” says Wood. Technologies that give U.S. forces an advantage can find their way into the hands of groups like Hezbollah and Latin American drug traffickers. “If you’ve got cash you can buy just about anything these

days, including high-end weapon systems,” he says.Special Forces gear is keyed to work with low signatures, and

“darkness itself works to our advantage in general,” says one industry executive. “We try to provide gear that gives us the night as the edge, and a lot of it you’ll find strapped to their helmets or onto their rifles. ... Part of the whole trick is to try to do it in a manner that allows them to do their primary jobs as if it were during the daytime.” A related focus is “to make these things really, really lightweight” and able to run for long periods off small batteries.

At the same time, each supplier has to understand how its system or device fits with those of other suppliers. 3M’s communication headset, for instance, not only has to plug into a variety of sources -- aircraft intercom, ground vehicles, portable radios -- but it must as easily as possible be worn with things like a respiratory mask, combat eyewear, helmet and nape band, and body armor. Not least of all, says 3M’s Lavalle, it must fit. “How can you ensure that any soldier -- man, woman, big head, small head -- can put this on and it works? It’s not an easy task.” And there are some problems that can’t be easily solved. Headsets, for example, are hot in the desert.

The relatively small size of the Special Operations Forces – just 12,000 are deployed around the world on an average day, according to the command– and their hallmark individuality is a natural fit with the small entrepreneurial companies that supply much of the SOF gear. “We invite these groups in and they bring their entire kit that they need to carry, and we’ll design an alpha prototype in usually three to five days,” says Mystery Ranch’s Seacat. “We either send it with them, or have it meet them back home, and then they go out and test it” and give feedback.

Mystery Ranch also gets “satellite phone calls directly from Afghanistan,” Seacat says. “They’re usually calling to say, ‘Hey, thanks a lot, this is amazing stuff; other members of our group have seen it; we need to buy six more of these packs, like now.’ And then we send it straight to Afghanistan.”

Page 61: 2012 Spring Edition
Page 62: 2012 Spring Edition

62 DEFENSE STANDARD Spr ing 2012

By Elaine S. Povich

When Navy SEAL Team 6 raided Osama bin Lad-en’s compound in Pakistan, one important mem-ber of the team had keen ears and eyes, a small

body, and … a tail. The Special Operations dog, possibly named Cairo or Turk, likely went into the compound wearing at least as much specialized gear as the human combat members in the unit.

President Barack Obama singled out the dog for praise, but when he went to congratulate the canine, according to news reports, the presidential Secret Service detail insisted that the dog wear a muzzle. President or not, he’s still a stranger to the specially trained dogs that have become increasingly important to Special Operations teams, as well as regular military units, airport security teams and local police departments.

In short, Cairo is not anything like Bo, the First Dog.

From his protective vest to his goggles, camera, harness and equipment, the SEAL Team 6 dog was likely “kitted

out” in gear made to protect what was an invaluable member of

the team.Jim Amann, owner of Trident K9 in San

Clemente, Calif., which supplies military and police dog gear, says the Secret Service was right to be cautious about letting the SEAL dog too close to the president. “There’s too much chance of a dog biting him,” said Amann, who was a SEAL for 20 years and also has a military police background. “You are talking about dogs who have bit-ten numerous people in the line of duty.”

While much of what is known about the dog working the bin Laden raid is speculative (Special Operations forces are neces-sarily tight-lipped), the dog could have tracked down members of bin Laden’s entourage in hiding, chased and held them while human team members caught up, sniffed out booby traps or bombs, or ferreted out drug caches.

“When the team goes into a house or a cubby hole, if some-one is hiding, they are trained on alert to let you know if some-one is there,” says Jason Ferren, operator of EliteK9 dog gear company in Boaz, Ky.

it’s a

Special Operations K-9s gear up like their human counterparts for sensitive missions like the Osama bin Laden raid

DOG’S WORLD

CAIRO

PHO

TO: C

ou

rte

sy K

9 St

orm

Inc

.

Page 63: 2012 Spring Edition

You provide the will power, we’ll provide the path to achieve your personal best.

Our professional master’s programs and tracks expand

on existing skill sets to provide the tools and resources

required to push your career forward within a proven

online environment that’s convenient and flexible.

Learn more about our online graduate programs

by visiting quinnipiac.edu/quonline or by calling

877.403.4277.

QU Online Programs and Tracks

• MBA - Health Care Management

• Information Technology

• Interactive Communications

• Organizational Leadership - Human Resources Leadership - Public Service / Non-Profit Leadership - Strategic Leadership

• Teacher Leadership* - Mathematics Leadership - Literacy Leadership - Program Improvement Leadership

*Must be a certified school teacher prior to being admitted.

Page 64: 2012 Spring Edition

64 DEFENSE STANDARD Spr ing 2012

(LEFT): Special Operations dogs can be carried by backpack in customiz-able K9 Storm tactical body armor.

(BELOW): The K9 Storm intruder vest has an integrated waterproof camera for amphibious assaults.

PHO

TOS:

Co

urt

esy

K9

Sto

rm In

c.

“They could be behind a door, a false wall or a false door,” he says. In the bin Laden operation, he says, “They were on a short time frame; they didn’t have time to dissect that house if it had hidden walls or hidden doors. Look at Saddam Hussein – he was in a hole.”

Ferren, who has a military and police background, sells “everything for the working K9.” Among his many products, he lists Special Operations goggles and “mutt muffs” to pro-tect dogs’ ears from noise like explosions or heavy shelling. It keeps the dogs a little calmer, he says.

By far the most important piece of equipment the dogs wear is their vest. Some of the vests are made to ward

off blows from knives, other hand weapons or shrapnel. Oth-ers are bullet-proof. The vests also help insert the dogs into a combat zone – using the “fast rope” technique that may have been used to get troops from helicopters to the ground on the bin Laden raid – or as part of a human/dog parachute tandem jumping team.

K9 Storm Inc. in Winnipeg, Canada, makes custom vests sold to military units in 15 countries. While no one will say who made the vest the bin Laden-raid dog was wearing, K9 Storm vests are often tailored to specific missions, according to K9 Storm owners Jim and Glori Slater, a husband-and-wife team.

“We started the company solely to provide protection for dogs,” says Jim Slater, who has a German shepherd named Olaf. Slater worked as a municipal police officer during the 1990s and was part of an operation that quelled the Headingly

Jail riot in Manitoba in 1996. Eight guards were injured by inmates wielding homemade weapons fashioned from kitchen utensils and fire extinguishers.

“We went to take control of the jail and about 140 people were still running loose, and inside that environment there were a lot of weapons,” Slater says. “The dog was first into the building and he could have been stabbed or slashed. (He) had no armor whatsoever, whereas the team was well-armored. It made sense to me that we should minimize the vulnerable areas on his body and at the same time develop a harness so he could be raised and lowered.”

K9 Storm makes customized vests ranging in cost from a couple of thousand dollars to tens of thousands.

Combat dogs get specialized training before they are assigned to units. Many don’t make it. They have to

respond to commands, and, unlike most police dogs, have to be able to work with a variety of handlers because of the unpre-dictable nature of war. They grow close to their units, but they aren’t pets. It’s not like they retrieve Frisbees in their spare time or frolic on the floor with handlers. It’s strictly a working relationship.

Page 65: 2012 Spring Edition
Page 66: 2012 Spring Edition

66 DEFENSE STANDARD Spr ing 2012

J

PHO

TOS:

Co

urt

esy

K9

Sto

rm In

c.

(RIGHT): The K9 Storm Intruder Vest is equipped with automatic infra-red lighting systems to allow the handler to see what the dog is

seeing even in darkened hallways or cave searches.

(LEFT): A special vest allows dogs to rappel or fast-rope out of a helicopter with their handlers.

Several breeds of dogs are used as combat dogs, but mostly Belgian Malinois, Ger-man shepherds and Dutch shepherds. Dutch shepherds and Malinois are a little more agile than the German shepherds, the experts say.

“It’s a matter of who can kick your butt better, Jackie Chan or Arnold Schwarzeneg-ger,” says Ferren. “The Belgian Malinois and the Dutch shepherd are more like Jackie Chan.”

Tim Crockett, a former Special Forces member in the British Special Boat Service (the British equivalent of the SEALs), says the dogs can essentially wear the same kind of protective ballistic type vest as their human counterparts. “And it is kitted out with other types of sensors as well,” says Crocket, an official with Pioneer Consulting Group in Marietta, Ga. “Like cameras, so information can be passed back from the dog to the handlers.”

Dog-mounted cameras can tell handlers what is around corners or behind build-ings several hundred feet away. Those cameras can be mounted forward- or rear-

facing, depending on what the dog is looking for. The dog on the bin Laden mission probably carried a camera, though reports that video was streamed in real-time back to the White House are said to be erroneous.

A bomb-sniffing dog can approach a vehicle in a way that a soldier could not, even if the soldier is outfitted in protective gear. The dogs are very good at detecting explosive devices, which then allows a human team member to go in and defuse the device.

Sometimes, however, there are unforeseen consequences. One of Ferren’s clients told him about a dog working in Iraq that, while searching a car, looked back at his handler when he smelled explosives. Seeing that reaction, an insurgent blew up the car, killing the dog.

Ferren says as hard as that is, most of the time the dogs are successful. “It’s not like they are sending dogs on a suicide mission,” he says. “If they search 20 cars, maybe one is positive. Would you rather the handler and the dog go, or just the dog?”

Page 67: 2012 Spring Edition

JUGGERNAUTDEFENSE

industria

l d

esig

n, m

echanic

al

engin

eerin

g, &

prototypes

for m

ilita

ry p

roducts

[email protected] 480.282.4621 Scottsdale AZ Alexandria VA

IP64 ruggedized case w/MIL-SPEC connector

flip-down armor mount

connection to tactical radio

full touchscreen access

patents pending - currently under evaluation by the US ARMY

“smartphones on battlefields”becomes a reality with the...

C

M

Y

CM

MY

CY

CMY

K

Defense-Standard_01.ai 1 04-May-12 15:04:56

Protecting the War�ghter - Clinically E�ective Holistic Solutions for Sleep Disruptionsand Chronic Pain with David Silver MD

David Silver, MD is a board certi�ed rheumatologist and executive VP of Scienti�c and Medical A�airs at Targeted Medical Pharma Inc. He is the former clinical chief of rheumatology at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center.

Q. What is an e�ective and safe treatment for Sleep Disruptions and Pain associated with Traumatic Stress? A. Sentra AM® and Sentra PM® have been e�ective in managing the symptoms associated with Posttraumatic Stress.* In multiple studies, Sentra PM has shown statistically relevant improvements in both sleep quality and function.**

Q. What is an e�ective and non-addictive medication for the management of chronic pain? A. Theramine® is clinically proven to provide signi�cant improvements in chronic back pain and reduce in�ammation without any reported adverse side e�ects or addiction.*** Theramine is an FDA regulated Rx only encapsulated medical food indicated for the dietary management of pain. Theramine is not an NSAID or Opiate.

Safety Information: Sentra AM, Sentra PM, and Theramine are Rx only medical foods. These products are formulated using speci�c amino acids in combination with other ingredients that are Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) by the FDA. Mild headaches, stomach upset and nausea are the most common side e�ects associated with Sentra AM, Sentra PM and Theramine.

*Sentra AM is a medical food indicated for the dietary management of cognitive disorders. Sentra PM is a medical food indicated for the dietary management ofsleep disorders associated with depression. Sentra AM® and Sentra PM® for Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Gulf War Fibromyalgia (GWF) clinical trial 2011. **Sentra PM and management of sleep disorders and depression, publication pending, Journal of Central Nervous System Disorders.***Theramine and naproxen double blind clinical trial, American Journal of Therapeutics 2010.

Manufactured by Physician Therapeutics, 2980 Beverly Glen Circle, Suite 301Los Angeles, CA 90077

QA&

Distributed by N3TIA Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business

www.N3TI.com

Page 68: 2012 Spring Edition

ToDSKamanAd.indd 1 3/11/2011 2:57:59 PM

Page 69: 2012 Spring Edition

69Spr ing 2012 DEFENSE STANDARD

’13 AIR FORCE Preview

B-3 or not B-3?Forging ahead with next-generation bomber

By Nick Adde

J

The Air Force continues moving forward with plans to procure a new long-range bomber to

augment and ultimately replace the aging fleets of B-52s, B-1s and B-2s through at least the 2040s.

Air Force civilian and military leaders have a clear vision about the plane’s primary mission – to carry nuclear and non-nuclear payloads, and fly either manned or unmanned.

The Obama administration budgeted $197 million on bomber development in fiscal 2012. The bomber remained in the fiscal 2013 defense budget, which called for spending about $292 million in fiscal 2013 and another $6 billion through 2017. The current timetable calls for buying 80 to 100 aircraft for about $550 million each in fiscal 2010 dollars, with the bomber reaching initial operational capability by 2020.

In the budget document released in February, according to DoD Buzz, the Air Force says the new bomber “will not need the same capabilities that were planned for the [previously canceled] Next Generation Bomber” because it will “incorporate many subsystems (engines, radars, other avionics) and technologies that are already proven.”

Because the bomber will rely on “proven technologies” and evolve with new threats as the legacy B-52 fleet has done, acquisition costs will be well below that of the B-2 stealth bomber, the Air Force says in the budget document. The B-2 cost more

than $2 billion per plane after Pentagon officials slashed the planned size of the fleet to 20.

Costs will remain at $550 million per aircraft, Gen. Norton Schwartz, the Air Force chief of staff, assured reporters at a February Pentagon breakfast. “If it doesn’t, we don’t get a program,” Schwartz said,

according to Air Force Times. Maj. Gen. David Scott, the Air Force’s

then-director of operational capability requirements, said last year that it was too soon to say what the new bomber would look like. “It will be subsonic, probably. It depends on what industry tells is what it can and cannot do,” Scott said.

Industry, for its part, had been waiting for specific guidance from the Air Force before moving forward. “Until the program is further defined, there isn’t much to say,” Chris Haddox of Boeing Co. said last spring. “We are awaiting the requirements of a new bomber from the customer.”

During a hearing before the House

Armed Services Committee last year, then-Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates told lawmakers that the Air Force wants a stealth bomber that can carry air-to-air missiles, a payload ranging from 20,000 to 40,000 pounds, and an active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar system, which uses electronic beams to identify, track and

target adversaries. Scott offered some more

detailed insight as to what those requirements would stipulate. Development will proceed, he said, with a keen eye focused on budget constraints and finite combat-mission requirements.

“We’re not doing ‘Battlestar Galactica.’ It will [rely upon] current technology. We don’t want to make this so costly that we can’t afford it,” Scott said.

Rather, the new plane would assume a role in a wide network of warfighting assets known as the “family

of systems.” Maj. Gen. Alfred Flowers, the Air Force’s budget chief, said in a February 2011 budget briefing. “The bomber is the centerpiece, but there’s ISR (intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance) … electronic attack and communication capabilities that would be part of this family system.”

The new bomber would send a strong message to potential adversaries, who “are always trying to get ahead of us,” Scott said. “If we don’t [build the new bomber], are we ready to accept the notion that we’re not a global power? I’m not sure we’re ready to do that.”

--Julie Bird contributed to this report.

PHO

TO: S

taff

Sg

t. A

ng

elit

a M

. La

wre

nc

e

The B-52 Stratofortress has been part of the U.S. bomber arsenal for more than a half-century, but the Air Force says it’s time to build a new heavy bomber that will eventually replace B-52s and their younger cousins, the B-1 Lancer and B-2 Spirit.

Page 70: 2012 Spring Edition

THE WORLD’S FIRST FULLY INTEGRATED, FULLY MODULAR HEAD PROTECTION SYSTEM.More science. More technology. More protection. Less weight.And you can tailor the system to the mission.So a soldier can do what a soldier does.

The ultimate protection from trauma—

Blunt force, blast and ballistic.

With a lightweight wearability…

That allows for peak performance.

THE ULTIMATE HEAD PROTECTION

INTRODUCING BATLSKIN™

revisionmi l i tary.com/bat lskin

© 2011 REVISION MILITARY INC. BATLSKIN™ IS A TRADEMARK OWNED BY REVISION MILITARY S.A.R.L. AND USED UNDER LICENSE BY REVISION MILITARY INC. BE REVISION READY.® AND REVISION® ARE TRADEMARKS OF REVISION MILITARY. REVISION MILITARY LTD., 7 CORPORATE DRIVE, ESSEX JUNCTION VT 05452 USA.

REV1356_BATLSKIN_DEFENSE_STANDARD 8.38x10.88 X1a.pdf 1 20/02/12 9:22 AM

Page 71: 2012 Spring Edition

71Spr ing 2012 DEFENSE STANDARD

For the first time in eight years of combat deployments, the Army is outfitting Stryker armored per-

sonnel carriers with armor that will stand up to some of the deadliest enemy bombs.

New Stryker wheeled vehicles in Af-ghanistan are equipped with blast-deflect-ing hulls similar to those on the Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicle fleet.

The service will spend up to $320 million develop-ing the new hull design through the end of this fiscal year, including the full range of test-ing, says Col. Rob-ert Schumitz, who oversees Stryker development as the project manager for Stryker Brigade Combat Team. Fielding 450 new Stryker vehicles equipped with a double-V hull through 2012 will cost about $1.3 billion, with a per-unit cost of about $2.4 million. The total buy was planned at 742, the Army said in March.

“The unique hull design, combined with energy attenuating seats, provides sig-nificantly improved protection for Stryker soldiers,” Schumitz says in a written re-sponse to questions. “Soldier survivabil-ity is the Army’s No. 1 priority. Once we determined that the [double-V hull] effort was an achievable and acceptable risk, we swiftly engaged in executing the robust program.”

The Army began developing the Stryker Brigade Combat Team in late 1999 to cre-ate a fighting force with the flexibility of a light unit and the staying power of a heavi-er outfit. Since 2003 the service has fielded seven Stryker brigades, each equipped with about 300 Stryker vehicles.

But warfare in Afghanistan brought new threats. Afghanistan’s road network is less developed than Iraq’s, and enemy im-provised explosive devices tend to be sig-nificantly larger, Schumitz says. Casualties to Stryker troops mounted. The Army be-gan searching for ways to combat the IED threat in 2008, and accelerated the double-V hull program in 2009.

In late 2010, Stryker manufacturer Gen-eral Dynamics agreed to deliver the first 150 new Strykers with double-V hulls by May 2011. “We actually delivered 177,” says Mike Cannon, senior vice president

for General Dynamics’ Ground Combat Systems. “We had to redesign seven vari-ants; that is a significant effort.”

The middle of the Stryker vehicle equipped with the new hull is no higher off the ground than the basic Stryker, Can-non says. The V-shaped design deflects the

blast out and away from the Stryker and its occupants.

Schumitz says that the acceleration of the double-V hull program prompted the Army to conduct survivability test-ing while the new Strykers were in pro-duction. Normally, testing is completed before a system goes into production.

Cannon said last fall that the new hulls proved “outstanding” at protecting soldiers from bomb attacks in Afghanistan. In March, Lt. Gen. Bill Phillips, principal

military deputy to the assistant secretary of the Army for acquisition, logistics and technology, said that in 38 of the 40 cases in which the Strykers hit land mines, the occupants suffered only minor injuries, according to Defense Industry Daily. The vehicle “performed beyond our expecta-tions,” Phillips said.

The new-style hull adds about 4,000 pounds to the Stryker’s weight and requires a beefed-up suspension, Schumitz says.

Cannon says the weight is not signifi-cant, and that the vehicle can still be trans-ported aboard a C-130 Hercules aircraft.

’13 ARMY Preview

Bomb ProtectionArmy buys Strykers with protective hulls

By Matthew Cox

J

The Stryker Infantry Carrier Vehicle stands ready to provide protected transport for an infantry squad and direct fire support during the dismounted assault.

PHO

TO: U

.S. A

rmy

Page 72: 2012 Spring Edition

JUST A

POLITE

HEADS UP

TO

PIRATES

DESIGNED BY AND

FOR MEMBERS OF

NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE

4” ELMAX BLADE

MATTE TiCN PVD COATED

BLACK G10 SCALES

BOTH “BEAR GRIP”

AND PLAIN

SCALES INCLUDED

STERILE OR WITH

CUSTOM ORDER

TEAM TRIDENT

NO QUESTIONS WARRANTY

LOANER PROGRAM

www.blackwaterusa.com

Blackwater name and logo are registered trademarks of PG Investments of Virginia, LLC. Product design and BW Specwar 4 name are trademarks of DPx Gear, Inc. © 2012 DPx Gear, Inc. Product shown and specifications stated may vary from actual product.

DPx Gear Specwar Ad_Spring 2012_outlines.indd 1 5/9/12 7:52 PM

Page 73: 2012 Spring Edition

73Spr ing 2012 DEFENSE STANDARD

A familiar friend again is coming to the aid of Ma-rines calling for close-air

support – the venerable Huey Cobra attack helicopter. But while the air-craft’s silhouette will look the same, there will be some marked differences.

In November 2010 the Defense Department approved full production of the newest version of the Cobra, the AH-1Z. This paves the way for full-rate production of the $11.9 billion pro-gram, and deployment to Afghanistan and other theaters where it is need-ed. Funding continues in the administration’s fis-cal 2013 budget request, which included $820 million for 28 H-1 Ma-rine helicopters, includ-ing nine new AH-1Zs and four remanufactured ones.

The new “Zulu” helicopters have identical airframes to the AH-1W “Whiskey” aircraft they are replacing. Indeed, manufacturer Bell Helicopter built some early Zulus on completely refurbished fuselages of older birds. But the similarities end there.

“The Marine on the ground will benefit on three things,” says Col. Harry Hewson, program manager for both the AH-1Z and the UH-1Y (“Yan-kee”) Venom utility helicopter, its pro-duction twin, at Naval Air Systems Command at Patuxent River Naval Air Station, Md.

“First, the Zulu has a much lon-ger on-station time than the Whiskey.

It can stick around for up to twice as long, depending upon circumstances, before it has to go back and get gas,” says Hewson, himself an H-1 pilot. “It has twice the ordnance load as its predecessor, particularly in Hellfire missiles. The third thing might not be

really evident, but the Zulu probably will be standing off further behind him, because of phenomenal optics. It can identify the enemy from much further distances than its predecessor.”

Experts are quick to extend the wel-come mat to the improved Cobra.

“Anytime you can upgrade avionics and maintenance capabilities of sup-porting aircraft, it’s a good thing for the guys on the ground,” says Dakota Wood, a former Marine infantry offi-cer and senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, a Washington-based think tank.

Integrating advanced weapon sys-tems and avionics plus more powerful

engines in an existing airframe pays off by minimizing retraining for pi-lots and ground crews, and ensures the new aircraft will fit in the same tight spaces on amphibious assault ships as its predecessors, Wood says.

Bell Helicopter was slated to build a total of 349 new helicop-ters on the common air-frame – 189 AH-1Zs and 160 UH-1Y Yankees. The programs are so closely linked, its managers say, that it is impossible to talk of one without mentioning the other. “We designed the two helicopters to be as common as possible,” says Kevin Kett, the project manager for both aircraft at Bell Helicopter.

As such, the two air-craft share 84 percent of

the same parts – including the entire drive system and avionics. The fuselages are different, with the Zulu con-

figured for two pilots and the Yankee extended for carrying troops, Kett says.

At Bell, the intent to refurbish more old aircraft into new AH-1Zs turned out to be more difficult than initially envisioned. “We remanufactured 10 aircraft before we decided it was too hard to [mesh] old 1970s [airframes] and new technology,” Kett says.

For crew members, the adjust-ment centers around becoming famil-iar with all of the systems, Hewson says. “There’s not a traditional dial in the cockpit; everything is on computer screens. We present our data as a projec-tion on the visor the pilot looks at.”

’13 MARINE CORPS Preview

Zulu upgrades give the Huey new chopsBy Nick Adde

AH-1Z Cobra

J

U.S. Navy Aviation Boatswain’s Mate Patrick Henry, foreground, guides a U.S. Marine Corps AH-1Z Super Cobra helicopter as it prepares to land aboard amphibious assault ship USS Makin Island (LHD 8) while the ship is under way in the Pacific Ocean.

PHO

TO: C

pl.

Pre

sto

n R

ee

d

Page 74: 2012 Spring Edition

Awarded “America’s Top Military-Friendly Colleges & Universities” 3 Years Running

A World Leader in Online Education at an Affordable Price

Apply Online Now Financial Aid Available

Fully AccreditedEasy Transferability of CreditsLOI Institution MyCAARanked a National Best Buy Partnered with GoArmyEdYellow Ribbon Troops to Teachers

Accepts DANTES and CLEP ExamsRecognized for Excellence by the Sloan-C Foundation

NOBODY DOES “MILITARY-FRIENDLY” BETTER THAN FHSU.

Forward thinking. World ready.www.fhsu.edu/virtualcollege 800.628.FHSU

OVER 30 ONLINE DEGREE PROGRAMS AVAILABLE

Elementary Education TEAM K-6 w/Special Ed MinorEarly Childhood UnifiedElementary Education TEAM K-6TEAM K-6 Honors

MASTER’S DEGREESMaster of Business AdministrationTen Concentrations AvailableMaster of Liberal Studies

CounselingEducationEducational AdministrationHealth and Human PerformanceInstructional TechnologyNursing

AdministrationEducationFamily Nurse Practitioner

Special Education

CERTIFICATE PROGRAMSEnhance your skills with 51 Certificates available.

Bachelor of Science in Technology Leadership

Computer Networking and TelecommunicationsWeb DevelopmentJustice StudiesMedical Diagnostic Imaging

BACHELOR’S DEGREESBachelor of General Studies

MarketingManagement Information SystemsTourism and Hospitality ManagementBachelor of ScienceBusiness Education

Customizable Degree17 Options Available

Customizable Degree20 Options Available

Three Concentrations AvailableEducation

Bachelor of Business AdministrationManagementManagement - Concentration in Human Resources

Bachelor of Arts in SociologyBachelor of Arts in Political Science

Master of Science

Professional Science Master’s in Health Care Administration

Nursing - RN to BSN

Organizational Leadership

Page 75: 2012 Spring Edition

75Spr ing 2012 DEFENSE STANDARD

Despite program delays and cost overruns, the U.S. Navy is standing by plans

to buy almost 700 F-35 Joint Strike Fighters.

Early last year then-Defense Secretary Robert Gates responded to new technical problems with the Marine Corps’ F-35 variant by placing it on two years’ probation. He also shifted the tri-service program’s purchasing schedule by shifting the Marines’ vertical take-off-and-landing variant to the last of the three.

The good news, according to a March report by the General Accountability Office, is that performance of the short takeoff and vertical landing variant improved last year, prompting Defense Secretary Leon Panetta to put an early end to the probation in January. Several fixes, though, are “temporary and untested,” the GAO says.

More troublesome is the continuing cost increases. The program cost, already more than $1 trillion, has increased by about $15 billion since June 2010 – $5 billion for development and $10 billion for procurement – part of an overall $119 billion cost increase in the past five years.

“Management and development of the more than 24 million lines of software code continue to be of concern and late software releases have

delayed testing and training,” GAO says. “Development of the critical mission systems that give the JSF its core combat capabilities remains behind schedule and risky. To date, only 4 percent of the mission system

requirements for full capability has been verified.”

Testing of a “fully integrated” JSF is now expected no earlier than 2015.

Some defense-sector sources say Navy leaders are not committed to the Lockheed Martin-made F-35, but service and program officials so far are sticking by the F-35 in public.

The Department of the Navy was slated to buy 680 carrier-launched and vertical take-off-and-landing F-35s. Its 2013 budget request included six F-35Bs, the Marine jump-jet version, and four F-35Cs, the carrier version for the Navy, Navy Times reported.

The Navy also asked to increase

research and development spending from $1.31 billion to $1.48 billion, the newspaper reported.

The overall Department of Defense budget request included $9.17 billion to buy a total of 29 F-35s and related

procurement costs, AOL Defense reported.

Despite the recent d e v e l o p m e n t a l problems, industry officials and analysts say the F-35 will be a big step forward in air-to-ground, air-to-air, intelligence-g a t h e r i n g , electronic-warfare and other missions.

“The leap in warfighting capability will be profound – more than just an evolutionary advance,” says Steve O’Bryan, Lockheed

Martin Aeronautics’ vice president for F-35 business development. “Because of its [low-observable] stealth, the F-35 will be able to operate in high-threat environments that current-generation fighters can neither penetrate nor survive.”

Because the Pentagon and almost a dozen allies decided to build three variants, proponents say the operational and lifetime costs of the U.S. military’s entire F-35 fleet will be cheaper than separately pursuing new multirole fighter jets for the Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps.

-Julie Bird contributed to this article.

Joint Strike FighterNavy pushes forward on F-35 purchases, testing

By John T. Bennett

’13 NAVY Preview

The U.S. Navy variant of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter aircraft, the F-35C, conducts a test flight over the Chesapeake Bay near Naval Air Station Patuxent River in Maryland.

J

PHO

TO:

Co

urt

esy

of L

oc

khe

ed

Ma

rtin

Page 76: 2012 Spring Edition

76 DEFENSE STANDARD Spr ing 2012

Father of military combat diving, and creator of SCUBA, laid to rest

By Dave Chace

FINAL Combat Dive

PHO

TO IL

LUST

RA

TIO

N: L

au

rin H

um

ph

ries

Dr. Christian Lambertsen, a World War

II combat diver known as the father of military combat diving, conducted his “final combat dive mission” during a ceremony March 10 when his ashes were committed to the Atlantic Ocean.

His sons and grandsons, along with U.S. Army and Navy divers considered to be a part of Lambertsen’s extensive legacy, honored his memory in a small ceremony in Key West, Fla., over the waters used to train modern special-operations combat divers.

Lambersten died Feb. 11, 2011, at the age of 93.“We knew we wanted this ceremony to include more

than our immediate family,” says David Lambertsen, one of Christian’s four sons, “and we’ve always considered the military to be an important part of our father’s life.

Under clear skies, on slightly choppy waters in 80-degree weather, four boats were gathered in a circle about one

mile off the coast. Lambertsen’s four sons spread their father’s remains into the sea as past and present service

members stood at attention, paying their last respects to the inventor, doctor, scholar, and OSS operator.

Lambertsen’s 70-year career is layered with scientific achievement, beginning in 1941 with the invention of the Lambertsen Amphibious Respiratory Unit -- which he later renamed the Self-Contained Underwater Breathing Apparatus, or SCUBA. At the age of 24, while attending medical school, Lambertsen’s invention drew the interest of the Office of Strategic Services, the wartime intelligence operation considered to be the precursor to the Central Intelligence Agency and U.S. Special Operations Command.

“When World War II broke out, everyone realized they needed people to be able to sneak in and blow up ships,” says Maj. Trevor Hill, an Army Special Forces officer and the commander of the Special Forces Underwater Operations School in Key West. “Lambertsen brought [the LARU] to a meeting with the Office of Strategic Services. … He got in a pool and demonstrated that he could breathe

Page 77: 2012 Spring Edition
Page 78: 2012 Spring Edition

78 DEFENSE STANDARD Spr ing 2012

U.S. Army and Navy service members assigned to Naval Air Station Key West and the U.S. Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and School salute as taps is played during a ceremony honoring Dr. Christian Lambertsen, a former Army major, OSS operator and World War II veteran, March 10 in Key West, Fla. During the ceremony, Lambertsen’s family members committed his ashes to the Atlantic Ocean. In the background stands the U.S. Army’s Special Forces Underwater Operations School, where Lambertsen’s legacy lives on in the training of modern military combat divers.

PHO

TO: S

taff

Sg

t. R

uss

ell

Lee

Klik

a

J

underwater, without creating bubbles, which was mind-blowing at the time.”Lambertsen trained the operational swimmers for a newly created OSS

maritime unit, and joined them as a direct-commission U.S. Army major following his medical school graduation -- where he was first in his class.

“Someone once described the ideal OSS candidate as a Ph.D. who could win a bar fight,” says Charles Pinck, director of the nonprofit OSS Society. “I think Dr. Lambertsen fits that profile perfectly, because he was out there on missions, which was harrowing business.”

Lambertsen spent most of World War II as a member of the Pacific Fleet Underwater Demolition Team, leading numerous underwater missions in Burma to attach explosives to Japanese ships. He also served as his unit’s medical officer.

David Lambertsen says his father, who was a tough, physically fit young man, wanted to do his part to serve his country during World War II, and also wanted to see his own invention in action.

“For him, serving in the OSS was a way of testing his own equipment,” David says. “There was no better way for him to know how he could improve it.”

Following World War II, Lambertsen joined the faculty for the University of Pennsylvania’s School of Medicine, researching atmospheric, undersea, aerospace and industrial environmental physiology, as well has human environmental toxicology. He founded the university’s Institute of Environmental Medicine, and contributed to projects Mercury and Gemini and the International Space Station for NASA.

“You can’t limit his contributions to only what he did with the OSS,” says Pinck, “but he started with the OSS, so we proudly claim him as our own.”

Chace is a public affairs officer with the U.S. Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and School at Fort Bragg, N.C.

Page 79: 2012 Spring Edition

• RECON • LIGHT STRIKE ASSAULT • SARCrew Driven in and out of CV-22 (Requires No Mod or Payload Prep)

® Registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark office by Phoenix Interernational Systems, Inc.

ATV Corp a division of Phoenix International Systems, Inc.

812 W. Southern AvenueOrange, CA 92865

714 283-4800www.atvcorp.com I N T E R N A T I O N A L

www.atvcorp.com

corpA Division of Phoenix International

SPEED RANGE ENDURANCE

®

Page 80: 2012 Spring Edition

While America’s service members valiantly carry out their mission, we stay true to a mission of our own … since 1996 TriWest has been On a Mission to Serve

our military and their families by providing access to high-quality health care.

Alongside our dedicated Military Health System partners and a network of more than 175,000 civilian healthcare providers,

TriWest is proud and privileged to serve our nation’s heroes.

On a Mission to Serve®

Providing access to quality health care for 2.9 million members of America’s military family in the 21-state TRICARE West Region. TriWest.com facebook.com/TriWest twitter.com/TriWest

TriWest.com/MissionToServe

Page 81: 2012 Spring Edition

81Spr ing 2012 DEFENSE STANDARD

C o v e r P h o t o g r a p h e ra b o u t t h e

Russell Lee Klika is a self-taught, award-winning photographer

and photojournalist for the Department of Defense. He joined

the Marines at 17 and became a machine gunner. While on his

first of three Western Pacific cruises, he purchased a 35mm film camera

on a whim, then started documenting the Marines around him as they

conducted beach assaults around the world. Soon the strength of his

photos earned him a spot as the first military photographer to attend the

Eddie Adams Experience in Photojournalism workshop.

In 1990 Klika left the Marines for the civilian world, where he worked

as a staff photographer for newspapers on both U.S. coasts. As a civilian

photojournalist, he covered myriad events including migrant work camps,

100-year floods and the emotionally charged Los Angeles riots. In 2003,

Klika returned to the military and volunteered for three tours in Iraq with the

Tennessee Army National Guard, where he served as a journalist for the

278th Armored Cavalry Regiment and later as a team leader for the 133rd

Mobile Public Affairs Detachment.

His team was responsible for documenting combat operations for the

3rd Brigade Combat Team “RAKKASANS” of the 101st Airborne Division.

Upon his return from Iraq, Klika was assigned to the First Army Operation

Warrior Trainer program for public affairs, where he mentored other military

photographers for a year. He was then assigned as the lead photographer

to the National Guard Bureau’s Strength Readiness Support Center in

Smyrna, Tenn.

In 2008 and 2009 Klika was assigned to a Special Forces unit to

document missions in Afghanistan, participating in more than 60 combat

operations with the unit. He recently was awarded the Bronze Star for his

photographic coverage. He credits his close personal relationships with

his comrades for allowing him to return with a wealth of powerful and

compelling images from the frontlines.

His work has been featured in more than 35 magazines, newspapers

and Web-based photo galleries worldwide, including Time, Newsweek,

the New York Times, Los Angeles Times, World Literature Today, Chicago

Tribune, Flaunt magazine, American Photo, the BBC, CNN and CNN

International, French Photo, the Human Rights First annual report and

Soldier of Fortune. He also is a frequent contributor to the Guard Experience

magazine. He recently published a book, “Iraq Through the Eyes of an

American Soldier,” a collection of images from tours in Iraq. Klika is currently

working in the Public Affairs Office at the John F. Kennedy Special Warfare

Center and School at Fort Bragg, N.C.

Russell Lee Klika

J

Page 82: 2012 Spring Edition

82 DEFENSE STANDARD Spr ing 2012

FINAL FRAME

Members of coalition Special Operations forces wait to recover supplies during an airdrop in the Shah Joy district in Afghanistan’s Zabul province.

PHOTO: Petty Officer 2nd Class Jon Rasmussen

82 DEFENSE STANDARD Spr ing 2012

Page 83: 2012 Spring Edition
Page 84: 2012 Spring Edition