100
Online Learning: What School Boards Should Know Joint Annual Conference of IASB/IASA/IASBO November 17, 2012

2012 school board conference presentation

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Presentation from Online Learning: What School Boards Need to Know. Presented at Triple I conference by Cindy Hamblin, Jeff Hunt, and Phil Lacey

Citation preview

Page 1: 2012 school board conference presentation

Online Learning: What School Boards Should Know

Joint Annual Conference of IASB/IASA/IASBONovember 17, 2012

Page 2: 2012 school board conference presentation

Joint Annual Conference of IASB/IASA/IASBO

Presenters: Cindy HamblinIllinois Virtual SchoolJeffrey HuntDuPage Regional Office of EducationPhilip LaceyNiles Township High School District 219

Page 3: 2012 school board conference presentation

Expanding Educational Access and Opportunities for Students

•Can you identify students that would benefit from an enrichment or advanced placement course(s) a not currently offered?

•Are there students facing scheduling conflicts (e.g course options, time of semesters)?

•Do you have students needing to recover credit or earn credit over the summer or in the midst of a semester?

•Have you identified students that need a remote education program (off-site)?

Page 4: 2012 school board conference presentation

Participant QuestionWhat is your interest in online learning?

● I am curious; I am here to find out more.

● We are discussing online learning in our district.

● We are actively planning an online program.

● We have an online program.

Page 5: 2012 school board conference presentation

Essential Question

How are you preparing

your graduates to learn in the post secondary digital

environment?

Page 6: 2012 school board conference presentation

Essential Question

How can you address students'

needs and interests in low

enrollment courses/subjects?

Page 7: 2012 school board conference presentation

Essential Question

How do you get your Board policies ready for digital learning?

Page 8: 2012 school board conference presentation

Essential Question

How do you prepare your

teachers to teach with digital learning

esources?

Page 9: 2012 school board conference presentation

Essential Question

How do you ensure that your students receive

quality digital courses?

Page 10: 2012 school board conference presentation

Creating Urgency

After today's session we hope

that the larger issues with digital

learning will create a higher level of

urgency for this matter in your school district.

Page 11: 2012 school board conference presentation

Definitions● iNACOL –

International

Association for K-12

Online Learning

●OER – Open

Educational Resources

(Free or inexpensive

course content.)

Page 12: 2012 school board conference presentation

Definitions

http://www.sloanconsortium.org/

Page 13: 2012 school board conference presentation

Key Components for a Virtual Program

● Instruction● Curriculum● Technology

Page 14: 2012 school board conference presentation

Blended Learning

Page 15: 2012 school board conference presentation

Blended Learning

Page 16: 2012 school board conference presentation

Online Learning●Students work at the

time of their choice.●May work at home or

at school●Have contact

electronically with teacher and other students.

●May have pacing charts to evenly divide work.

●May have weekly deadlines.

Florida Virtual School

Page 17: 2012 school board conference presentation

Overview

Page 18: 2012 school board conference presentation

TRENDSImpacting theLandscape ofOnline and

Blended Learning

Page 19: 2012 school board conference presentation

Numbers: Online Enrollments

http://www.inacol.org

● 2009, 2 million (est.) online class enrollments in K-12.

● 2012, several million estimated or slightly more than 5% of the total K-12 student population

● Thirty-one percent (31%) of higher

education students took at least one online course in the fall 2010 term. Sloan C group predicts 40% by 2012.

● 2011 - online and blended learning

opportunities exist for at least some students in all 50 states plus DC.

Page 20: 2012 school board conference presentation

Technology Trends in K-12 Education

Page 21: 2012 school board conference presentation

Educational Trends Impacting Online and Blended Learning

Page 22: 2012 school board conference presentation
Page 23: 2012 school board conference presentation

ILLINOIS

Page 24: 2012 school board conference presentation
Page 25: 2012 school board conference presentation
Page 26: 2012 school board conference presentation
Page 27: 2012 school board conference presentation
Page 28: 2012 school board conference presentation
Page 29: 2012 school board conference presentation
Page 30: 2012 school board conference presentation

DIGITAL LEARNING COUNCIL1. Student Eligibility: All students are digital learners. 2. Student Access: All students have access to high quality digital content and online courses.3. Personalized Learning: All students can customize their education using digital content through an approved provider.4. Advancement: Students progress based on demonstrated competency.5. Content: Digital content, instructional materials, and online and blended learning courses are high quality.6. Instruction: Digital instruction and teachers are high quality. 7. Providers: All students have access to multiple high quality providers.8. Assessment and Accountability: Student learning is the metric for evaluating the quality of content and instruction.9. Funding: Funding creates incentives for performance, options and innovation.10. Delivery: Infrastructure supports digital learning.

Each element includes recommended actions for lawmakers and policymakers!

http://digitallearningnow.com/

Page 31: 2012 school board conference presentation
Page 32: 2012 school board conference presentation

Illinois PolicyREMOTE EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM (REP)

● Public Act 96-0684 (HB 2448, 8/25/09) and modified PA 97-0339 (HB

3223, 8/12/11): Authorizes school districts to create and offer “remote educational programs” tailored to individual student needs and claim GSA for those programs. 105 ILCS 10-29.

● Prior law: GSA could only be claimed for virtual programs offered in a

classroom or other traditional school setting.

● Broad district discretion, provided the program and plan meet legislative

criteria.

Page 33: 2012 school board conference presentation

Two Key Elements for Establishing REP1. Adopted School Board Policy:

○ Criteria for participation○ Limits on numbers of students

or grade levels○ Approval process for

participation○ Process to develop student

plans○ System for calculating clock

hours of attendance○ Process for renewal

2. Student Remote Educational Plan:

○ Specific achievement goals○ Assessments○ Progress reports○ Teacher/student interaction○ Designation of supervising adult○ Other family responsibilities○ Consistency with IEP○ Participating in district programs○ Responsible district administrator○ Term○ Specific location or locations for

delivery

Page 34: 2012 school board conference presentation

REP: Other Requirements● Students remain enrolled in a school district attendance center, and are

tested and included for all State/federal accountability determinations.

● Certified/Highly Qualified Teachers responsible for critical instructional

activities.

● GSA claimable for any days up to limit of student’s GSA.

● ISBE rules require documentation of active participation to claim GSA.

● District policy and data must be submitted to ISBE.

Page 35: 2012 school board conference presentation

Illinois Virtual School (IVS) - The state’s 5-12 supplemental online program

● Contract awarded to the Peoria County Regional Office of Education in 2009

● In 2009, ISBE awarded a 7 year contract to the ROE to manage and operation its virtual school program.

● IVS is a Supplemental Program● Supplemental online programs provide a small number of

courses to students who are enrolled in a school separate from the online program.

Illinois Virtual School

Page 36: 2012 school board conference presentation

Illinois Virtual School (IVS) Mission

● IVS 5-12 ● Enhancing Educational Opportunities for Students through

Online Courses. IVS Courses are Offered in Partnership with the Local School.

● IVS-PD ● Delivering Online Professional Development Opportunities

to Illinois Educators.

ISBE's Virtual School Program for Illinois

Page 37: 2012 school board conference presentation

IVS Partners with Public & Private Schools

● Online, instructor-facilitated courses ○ 126 semester courses ○ 23 Advanced Placement semester courses○ Experienced, IL Certified, Highly Qualified Instructors

○ 58 current part-time instructors○ Completed online pre-service program

● Course content and instruction is delivered through the IVS learning management system.○ Students work at their own pace.○ Majority of the instruction is asynchronous○ Synchronous web-conferencing tools available in every course.

IVS (5-12) Program

Page 38: 2012 school board conference presentation

● Flexible Enrollment Dates. Each term has 17 weeks of instruction.

● Courses are approved by NCAA and College Board ○ Ceeb Code: 140188

● IVS Student Information System (SIS)○ Monitor student progress. ○ SIS is available to students, parents, and school personnel○ Completion certificate provides recommended grade and

percentages

● Cost is $250 per semester course. NOTE: District decides if the school or parent pays for the course.

IVS (5-12) Program

Page 39: 2012 school board conference presentation

Data

Page 40: 2012 school board conference presentation
Page 41: 2012 school board conference presentation

Components of a Quality Online or Blended

Program

Page 42: 2012 school board conference presentation

Technology

Page 43: 2012 school board conference presentation

ToolsProductivity SuiteAudio (headphones w/ mic)Video (webcam)Software

Page 45: 2012 school board conference presentation

LMSLearning Management System● Moodle● Blackboard● Desire to Learn

Page 46: 2012 school board conference presentation

SISStudent Information System● Use existing● Use seperate● Integrate data● Features

Page 47: 2012 school board conference presentation

Synchronous CommunicationFacilitates "Live" Conversation● Adobe Connect● Elluminate● Google Hangout

Page 49: 2012 school board conference presentation

Technology ConsiderationsInteroperability Among User Tools

TCO

LMS

SIS / LMS Interoperability

Synchronous Communication

Page 50: 2012 school board conference presentation

Curriculum

Page 51: 2012 school board conference presentation

Development Issues

●Common Core

●NCAA approval

●Technical know

how

Page 52: 2012 school board conference presentation

Course Development Philosophy

●Borrow (steal) it

●Buy it

●Build it yourself

Page 56: 2012 school board conference presentation

Content ConsiderationsContent Acquisition

OER Role

Quality

Measuring Student Outcomes

District Alignment

Page 57: 2012 school board conference presentation

Professional Development

Establishing an Effective Professional

Development Program

image source

Page 58: 2012 school board conference presentation

Common Myths / Misconceptions

● Virtual schools and regular school counselors can handle the few participating students without leadership support.

● Any regular classroom teacher is already qualified to teach online.

● Any highly qualified face-to-face classroom teacher is ready

to teach a quality online course that has previously been prepared or purchased. Some say those who teach a section that is already online don’t really teach at all!

http://www.inacol.org/research/docs/NACOL_PDforVSandOlnLrng.pdf

Page 59: 2012 school board conference presentation

Common Myths / Misconceptions

http://www.inacol.org/research/docs/NACOL_PDforVSandOlnLrng.pdf

● Virtual schooling will fit with regular school routines and practices. The technology coordinator and counselor will provide any professional development necessary.

● Newly qualified teachers who learn about virtual

schooling in their preservice programs will be ready to teach online when they graduate.

Page 60: 2012 school board conference presentation

Prepare for the "Why?"

● Concisely Define Purpose

● Purpose Drives Design

● Effectively Convey Goal

● Build Consensus

image source

Page 61: 2012 school board conference presentation

Purpose Statement

District 219 has instituted Board Goal #3: Anywhere, Anytime Learning. As students receive devices and participate in a re-written curriculum (BOE Goal 2 Ensuring a guaranteed and rigorous curriculum and common final exam) teachers need to be able to effectively leverage the educational potential these devices offer students. Tech 1 exposes teachers to a wide variety of common resources (web 2.0, collaborative, FOSS) which will help them effectively select and develop educational experiences for their students.

Page 62: 2012 school board conference presentation

Wisconsin● 30 hours of PD for e-

learning/online classroom instruction.

● Course content based on the iNACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching

http://dpi.wi.gov/imt/onlinevir.html image source

Illinois● Current IL Certification ● Highly Qualified in

Content Area

Page 63: 2012 school board conference presentation

PD ConsiderationsNeed Cabinet/BOE level support

Required or optional training

Timeline for completion

Content

Credit / remuneration options

image source: http://farm1.static.flickr.com/64/191668056_20bbc7e89e_o.jpg

Page 65: 2012 school board conference presentation

Programmatic DevelopmentWhat is the purpose / reason for your PD program?

Do current offerings support your online learning initiative?

Who will receive PD?

In what setting will participants receive instruction?

Where will your curriculum come from?

How will you define success from your PD program?

Page 66: 2012 school board conference presentation

PD ResourcesiNACOL: National Standards for Quality Online Courses● http://www.inacol.org/research/nationalstandards/

ISTE: NETS● http://www.iste.org/standards.aspx

iNACOL: PD for Virtual Schooling and Online Learning● http://www.inacol.org/docs/NACOL_PDforVSandOlnLrng.pdf

D219 Anywhere, Anytime Resources● http://url.d219.org/aal

Page 67: 2012 school board conference presentation

Quality Assurance

Page 69: 2012 school board conference presentation

Quality Assurance

Quality Course Design

Page 70: 2012 school board conference presentation

Inputs and OutputsPROMISING PRACTICES

Quality Assurance

Page 71: 2012 school board conference presentation

PROMISING PRACTICES

Provide students multiple pathways to learn:●Text●Audio●Video

Page 72: 2012 school board conference presentation

Quality Assurance

Effective program evaluation●Participation

targets●Completion goals●Cost targets●Student feedback●Comparison to

traditional courses/subjects

Page 73: 2012 school board conference presentation

PROMISING PRACTICES

●Requiring students have interactivity with the teacher and other students.

Image Credit

Page 74: 2012 school board conference presentation

PROMISING PRACTICES

●Requiring weekly, purposeful communication between the teacher and individual students.

Image Credit

Page 75: 2012 school board conference presentation

PROMISING PRACTICES

●Regular formative assessments, followed by periodic formal evaluations by outside reviewers.

Page 76: 2012 school board conference presentation

Interaction Triangle

Student

Teacher

StudentContent

●Essential Understandings●Course Goals●Student insights

Page 77: 2012 school board conference presentation

PROMISING PRACTICES

●Using live virtual sessions with software like Blackboard Collaborate or Abobe Connect.

Image Credit

Page 78: 2012 school board conference presentation

Quality Assurance

●Measures for academic performance.

Image Credit

Page 79: 2012 school board conference presentation

PROMISING PRACTICES

●Delivering an Engaging and Challenging Course.

Image Credit

Page 80: 2012 school board conference presentation

Quality Assurance Measures

●Student outcomes○ Achievement○ Growth

Page 81: 2012 school board conference presentation

PROMISING PRACTICES

●Using the same course outlines, major assessments and courses examinations as face-to-face courses.

Image Credit

Page 82: 2012 school board conference presentation

Quality Assurance Measures

●Postsecondary and Workforce Readiness.

Page 83: 2012 school board conference presentation

PROMISING PRACTICES

●Proctoring major assessments and final exams.

Image Credit

Page 84: 2012 school board conference presentation

Quality Assurance Measures

●School Improvement initiatives and practices.

Page 85: 2012 school board conference presentation

PROMISING PRACTICES

●Challenging problems for accelerated (gifted) students.

Image Credit

Page 86: 2012 school board conference presentation

Quality Assurance Measures

●Graduation/Retention Rates

Page 87: 2012 school board conference presentation

PROMISING PRACTICES

●Adding oral exams at milestone points in the course to check for understanding.

Image Credit

Page 88: 2012 school board conference presentation

Quality Assurance Issues

How are non-traditional programs treated in the accreditation of your

schools?

Page 89: 2012 school board conference presentation

INTERACTION TRIANGLE

Student

Teacher

Student Content

● •Essential Understandings● •Course Goals● •Student insights

Page 90: 2012 school board conference presentation

Policy & Leadership

Page 91: 2012 school board conference presentation

WHO CAN BE SUCCESSFUL?●Achievement and Self-Esteem● BeliefsResponsibility/Risk Taking● Technology Skills and Access

●Organization and Self-Regulation

Roblyer, M.D. and Marshall, J. (2002). Prediction success of virtual high school students: Preliminary results from an educational success prediction instrument.

Page 92: 2012 school board conference presentation

COURSE TARGET AUDIENCES

Excellent Students, “A”, “B”

Average Students, “C”

Struggling StudentsCredit Recovery

Page 93: 2012 school board conference presentation

Digital Teaching and Learning Organizational Belief

How does online learning address organizational issues, not just online

learning issues?

Page 94: 2012 school board conference presentation

Digital Teaching and Learning Organizational Belief

● Role of Leaders○ Online Learning○ Technology○ Curriculum and Instruction○ Finance and Operations○ Senior level

Page 95: 2012 school board conference presentation

Digital Teaching and Learning Organizational Belief

Endorsing is not Leading….

Page 96: 2012 school board conference presentation

Teacher-related Policies

Contracts & licensure●Charter, District-led●Core vs. electives

Special licensure or development

●ESS, Career/Tech Ed (CTE)

Teacher-student contact time●Remote, live sessions, F2F,

blend?

Teacher evaluation●State/district process●Charter- ensuring

link to student data

Teacher Union●MOU’s?, ●Support for online ed teachers?

Page 97: 2012 school board conference presentation

INACOL DEMOGRAPHICS STUDY

www.glickconsulting.com

Page 98: 2012 school board conference presentation

INACOL DEMOGRAPHICS STUDY

www.glickconsulting.com

Page 99: 2012 school board conference presentation

Where do I start?

www.ilvirtual.org Today's presentation:

Today's handout:http://tinyurl.com/2012Handout

● Administrator Academy Course.

● Regional effort to help

schools with digital learning opportunities.

Page 100: 2012 school board conference presentation

Today's ResourcesPresentation:http://

Handout: http://tinyurl.com/2012Handout